Independent Review of Dfid Nigeria's
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF DFID NIGERIA’S MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN THE NIGER DELTA PROJECT (MADE) PHASE 1 AND 2 WITH REFERENCE TO OTHER M4P PROJECTS IN NIGERIA FINAL REPORT 19 FEBRUARY 2020 NATHAN ASSOCIATES EXPERT ADVISORY CALLDOWN SERVICE, LOT C i Title: Independent Review of DFID Nigeria’s Market Development in the Niger Delta project (MADE) Phase 1 and 2 with reference to other M4P projects in Nigeria Client: DFID Nigeria PO. No.: 7468 40118768 Contact and IMC Worldwide, 64 – 68 London Road • Redhill • Surrey, correspondence: • RH1 1LG • UK TEL: +44 (0)1737 231400 FAX: +44 (0)1737 771107 e-mail: [email protected] Author: Ignacio Fiestas (Nathan Associates) and Gordon Freer Contributions from Favour Simeon Amendment record: Version: 1 Date: 20 December 2019 Version: 2 Date: 19 February 2020 Final Report Call Down Manager: Rebecca Smith Quality Control: Anthony Way 12 December 2019 Rebecca Smith 20 December 2019 Output Approval: ii LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared by Nathan Associates with the assistance of the Department for International Development (DFID Nigeria) contracted through the Expert Advisory Call Down Services, Lot C, managed by IMC Worldwide. This report has been prepared in accordance with the usual care and thoroughness of the consulting profession for the use of DFID Nigeria and only those third parties who have been authorised in writing by IMC to rely on the report. It is based on generally accepted practices and standards at the time it was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. It is prepared in accordance with the scope of work and for the purpose outlined in PO Contract 40118768. This report should be read in full. No responsibility is accepted for use of any part of this report in any other context or for any other purpose or by third parties. This report does not purport to give legal advice. Legal advice can only be given by qualified legal practitioners. The views expressed in the report are entirely those of the author and do not necessarily represent DFID Nigeria’s own views or policies, or those of IMC Worldwide. Comments and discussion on items related to content and opinion should be addressed to the author, via [email protected]. Your feedback helps us ensure the quality and usefulness of all knowledge products. Please email [email protected] and let us know whether or not you have found this material useful; in what ways it has helped build your knowledge base and informed your work; or how it could be improved. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Limitations iii Table of contents 4 Acronyms 6 Executive summary 8 1. Introduction 11 1.1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 11 1.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 12 1.3 Limitations to this study ................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Context ............................................................................................................................ 15 2. Results at programme level 17 2.1 Market development component ..................................................................................... 18 2.2 ESIP component ............................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Value for money............................................................................................................... 22 3. Market Development Component 24 3.1 Fisheries ........................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.1 Context and relevance .............................................................................................. 24 3.1.2 Description of interventions ..................................................................................... 24 3.1.3 Efficiency and effectiveness ...................................................................................... 25 3.1.4 Impact and sustainability .......................................................................................... 27 3.2 Poultry ............................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.1 Context and relevance .............................................................................................. 28 3.2.2 Description of interventions ..................................................................................... 29 3.2.3 Efficiency and effectiveness ...................................................................................... 30 3.2.4 Impact and sustainability .......................................................................................... 32 3.3 Palm oil ............................................................................................................................ 32 3.3.1 Context and relevance .............................................................................................. 32 3.3.2 Description of interventions ..................................................................................... 33 3.3.3 Efficiency and effectiveness ...................................................................................... 34 3.3.4 Impact and sustainability .......................................................................................... 35 3.4 Agricultural inputs ............................................................................................................ 36 3.4.1 Context and relevance .............................................................................................. 36 3.4.2 Description of interventions ..................................................................................... 36 3.4.3 Efficiency and effectiveness ...................................................................................... 37 3.4.4 Impact and sustainability .......................................................................................... 38 3.5 Cassava ............................................................................................................................ 39 3.5.1 Background and relevance........................................................................................ 39 3.5.2 Description of interventions ..................................................................................... 40 3.5.3 Efficiency and effectiveness ...................................................................................... 41 3.5.4 Impact and sustainability .......................................................................................... 42 4. Edo State Investment Portfolio (ESIP) component 44 4.1 Background and context................................................................................................... 44 4.2 ESIP interventions ............................................................................................................ 45 4.2.1 Apiculture................................................................................................................. 45 4.2.2 Feed finishing ........................................................................................................... 47 4.2.3 Entertainment .......................................................................................................... 49 4 4.2.4 Waste to wealth ....................................................................................................... 51 4.2.5 Micro-retailing.......................................................................................................... 52 4.2.6 Access to market ...................................................................................................... 54 4.2.7 Skills development ................................................................................................... 55 5. Findings - Cross cutting areas 57 5.1 Gender ............................................................................................................................. 57 5.2 Influencing of stakeholders .............................................................................................. 58 5.3 Climate change and environment ..................................................................................... 60 5.4 Collaboration with PIND ................................................................................................... 60 6. Comparing interventions in MADE and Propcom 63 6.1 Poultry ............................................................................................................................. 64 6.2 Technology access ............................................................................................................ 66 6.3 Feed finishing ................................................................................................................... 68 6.4 Crop protection products and services ............................................................................. 70 6.5 Concluding remarks.......................................................................................................... 71 7. Monitoring and evaluation 74 7.1 Key findings ...................................................................................................................... 74 7.2 Concluding