DOCSLIB.ORG

The National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/11278 SHARE Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research DETAILS 178 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-10856-0 | DOI 10.17226/11278 AUTHORS BUY THIS BOOK Committee on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, National Research Council FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH Committee on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Board on Life Sciences Division on Earth and Life studies Board on Health Sciences Policy Institute of Medicine Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This material is based on work supported by the National Academies, the Ellison Medical Foundation, and the Greenwall Foundation. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research / Board on Life Sciences, National Research Council, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-309-09653-7 (pbk.) — ISBN 0-309-55024-6 (pdf) 1. Embryonic stem cells— Research. 2. Human embryo—Research. I. National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Life Sciences. II. National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Health Sciences Policy. QH588.S83G85 2005 616′.02774—dc22 2005016338 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu. Cover: A cluster of motor neurons and neural fibers derived from human embryonic stem cells in the lab of University of Wisconsin-Madison stem cell researcher and neurodevelop- mental biologist Su-Chun Zhang. The motor neurons are shown in red; neural fibers appear green and the blue specks indicate DNA in cell nuclei. These motor neurons were developed from one of James Thomson’s original human embryonic stem cell lines. Copyright for the photograph is held by the University of Wisconsin’s Board of Regents. Copyright 2005 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstand- ing engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also spon- sors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal govern- ment. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Acad- emy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Wm. A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research COMMITTEE ON GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH RICHARD O. HYNES (Co-Chair), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts JONATHAN D. MORENO (Co-Chair), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia ELIZABETH PRICE FOLEY, Florida International University, Miami, Florida NORMAN FOST, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin H. ROBERT HORVITZ, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts MARCIA IMBRESCIA, Arthritis Foundation, Lynnfield, Massachusetts TERRY MAGNUSON, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina CHERYL MWARIA, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York JANET ROSSANT, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada JANET D. ROWLEY, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Board on Life Sciences Liaison to the Committee R. ALTA CHARO, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Staff FRANCES SHARPLES, Study Director ROBIN SCHOEN, Senior Program Officer MATTHEW D. MCDONOUGH, Program Assistant KATHI E. HANNA, Science Writer NORMAN GROSSBLATT, Senior Editor iv Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research BOARD ON LIFE SCIENCES COREY S. GOODMAN (Chair), Renovis Inc., South San Francisco, California ANN M. ARVIN, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California JEFFREY L. BENNETZEN, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia RUTH BERKELMAN, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia R. ALTA CHARO, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin DENNIS CHOI, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania JEFFREY L. DANGL, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina PAUL R. EHRLICH, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California JAMES M. GENTILE, Research Corporation of America, Tucson, Arizona ED HARLOW, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts DAVID HILLIS, University of Texas, Austin, Texas KENNETH F. KELLER, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota RANDALL MURCH, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Alexandria, Virginia GREGORY A. PETSKO, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts STUART L. PIMM, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina BARBARA A. SCHAAL, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri JAMES TIEDJE, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan KEITH YAMAMOTO, University of California, San Francisco, California Staff FRANCES E. SHARPLES, Director KERRY A. BRENNER, Senior Program Officer ROBIN SCHOEN, Senior Program Officer MARILEE K. SHELTON-DAVENPORT, Senior Program Officer ROBERT T. YUAN, Senior Program Officer ADAM P. FAGEN, Program Officer ANN REID, Program Officer EVONNE P. Y. TANG, Program Officer SETH STRONGIN, Senior Program Assistant MATTHEW D. MCDONOUGH, Program Assistant DENISE GROSSHANS, Financial Associate v Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research BOARD ON HEALTH SCIENCES POLICY PHILIP PIZZO (Chair), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California LESLIE BENET, University of California, San Francisco, California DAVID BLUMENTHAL, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts GAIL H. CASSELL, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana ELLEN WRIGHT CLAYTON, Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, Tennessee DAVID COX, Perlegen Sciences, Mountain View, California NANCY DUBLER, Montefiore Medical Center & The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York ROBERT GIBBONS, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois LYNN R. GOLDMAN, Johns Hopkins
Recommended publications
  • Will the Real Lawmakers Please Stand Up: Congressional Standing in Instances of Presidential Nonenforcement

    Will the Real Lawmakers Please Stand Up: Congressional Standing in Instances of Presidential Nonenforcement

    PICKETT (DO NOT DELETE) 2/17/2016 12:23 PM Copyright 2016 by Bethany R. Pickett Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 110, No. 2 Notes and Comments WILL THE REAL LAWMAKERS PLEASE STAND UP: CONGRESSIONAL STANDING IN INSTANCES OF PRESIDENTIAL NONENFORCEMENT Bethany R. Pickett ABSTRACT—The Take Care Clause obligates the President to enforce the law. Yet increasingly, presidents use nonenforcement to unilaterally waive legislative provisions to serve their executive policy goals. In doing so, the President’s inaction takes the practical form of a congressional repeal—a task that is solely reserved for Congress under the Constitution. Presidential nonenforcement therefore usurps Congress’s unique responsibility in setting the national policy agenda. This Note addresses whether Congress has standing to sue in instances of presidential nonenforcement to realign and reaffirm Congress’s unique legislative role. In answering this question, this Note examines legislative standing precedent and argues that the Supreme Court’s reasoning supports a finding of congressional institutional standing. This Note further contends that it is normatively preferable for the judiciary to police the boundaries of each branch of government in instances of executive nonenforcement and apply the Constitution’s mandate that the President take care that the laws be faithfully executed. This maintains separation of powers and prevents one branch from unconstitutionally aggregating the power of another. AUTHOR—J.D. Candidate, Northwestern University School of Law, 2016; B.A., magna cum laude, The King’s College, 2012. Thank you to everyone on the Northwestern University Law Review who provided substantial feedback and improved this Note immeasurably. I am also overwhelmingly grateful to my family who has encouraged me in everything, and has been patient with me despite my work over countless holidays.
  • The Bridge Between Science and the Future It Creates

    The Bridge Between Science and the Future It Creates

    Cell Stem Cell Resource Review Communicating Hope: the Bridge between Science and the Future It Creates The Stem Cell Hope: How Stem Cell Medicine Can Change Our Lives Alice Park New York, Hudson Street Press (2011) 336 pp., ISBN: 978-1-59463-078-1 Stem cells and hope. For those who place their futures in the perpetuation of biomedical research, these two constructs— stem cells and hope—have become nearly synonymous. For the scientific community, the potential for their work to be the basis of hope seems all too obvious. Science has long been the very vehicle by which society tackles its most pressing and perplexing challenges. It was Vannevar Bush, the first US presi- dential science advisor and the intellectual powerhouse behind the National Science Foundation, who championed the role that science would need to play in addressing broad social, the opponents’ court. Park notes that the Bush advisor Jay Lef- economic, and technological problems. However, it was also kowitz himself stated, ‘‘A lot of the conservative groups saw Vannevar Bush who stated, ‘‘A belief may be larger than this .a little bit as a surrogate for abortion.’’ Language that a fact,’’ and for stem cell research, this perceptive observation has framed the debate, such as ‘‘cloning,’’ ‘‘destruction,’’ made over 50 years ago has come to define the field. ‘‘fetus,’’ ‘‘abortion,’’ and ‘‘slippery slope,’’ is the very language Alice Park works to dispel some of the ‘‘belief-as-fact’’ pattern introduced and perpetuated by those who have no greater that has driven the social side of stem cell research in her book, interest in the field than to see its demise.
  • Characterization of Embryonic Stem Cell-Differentiated Cells As Mesenchymal Stem Cells

    Characterization of Embryonic Stem Cell-Differentiated Cells As Mesenchymal Stem Cells

    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Fall 12-2015 Characterization of Embryonic Stem Cell-Differentiated Cells as Mesenchymal Stem Cells Rachael N. Kuehn University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Cell Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kuehn, Rachael N., "Characterization of Embryonic Stem Cell-Differentiated Cells as Mesenchymal Stem Cells" (2015). Honors Theses. 349. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/349 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi Characterization of Embryonic Stem Cell-Differentiated Cells as Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Rachael Nicole Kuehn A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in the Department of Biological Sciences December 2015 ii Approved by ______________________________ Yanlin Guo, Ph.D., Thesis Adviser Professor of Biological Sciences ______________________________ Shiao Y. Wang, Ph.D., Chair Department of Biological Sciences ______________________________ Ellen Weinauer, Ph.D., Dean Honors College iii ABSTRACT Embryonic stem cells (ESCs), due to their ability to differentiate into different cell types while still maintaining a high proliferation capacity, have been considered as a potential cell source in regenerative medicine. However, current ESC differentiation methods are low yielding and create heterogeneous cell populations.
  • Boosting the Cellular Potency of Embryonic Stem Cells by Spliceosome Targeting ✉ Wilfried A

    Boosting the Cellular Potency of Embryonic Stem Cells by Spliceosome Targeting ✉ Wilfried A

    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy www.nature.com/sigtrans RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT OPEN Boosting the cellular potency of embryonic stem cells by spliceosome targeting ✉ Wilfried A. Kues1 Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2021) 6:324; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00743-9 In recent work published in Cell, Shen et al.1 identified transfected ES cells with short interfering RNAs against different spliceosome inhibition in embryonic stem (ES) cells as a key spliceosome transcripts (the spliceosome consisted of 5 core and mechanism for the transition from pluri- to totipotency. Spliceo- several cofactor subunits, here 14 transcripts were targeted), some inhibition, achieved by RNA interference or the chemical respectively. Transient repression of 10 of the 14 splicing factors inhibitor pladienolide B, may gain widespread relevance to the resulted in ES cells, which maintained the typical colony culture of totipotent ES cells, in vitro differentiation of extra- morphology, however, pluripotent marker genes—Oct4 (Pou5f1), embryonal tissue and organoids, translation to the maintenance of Nanog, Sox2, Zfp42 and others—became down-regulated, at the pluripotent cells of other mammal species, including humans, and same time marker genes of totipotency—particularly Zscan4s and a better molecular understanding of cellular potency in stem cells MERVL—were up-regulated. Zscan4s (Zink finger and SCAN and cancer. domain containing 4) is a transcription factor and MERVL (murine The first successful isolation and maintenance of ES derived endogenous retrovirus L) an endogenous retrovirus with a usually fi 1234567890();,: from the inner cell mass (ICM) of murine blastocyst stages was restricted expression to 2-cell embryos. These results were veri ed described in 1981,2 and since then acted as game changer for by supplementing the culture medium with pladienolide B, a genetic studies in this mammalian model organism.
  • Scientists Turn Skin Cells Into Motor Neurons in ALS Patients

    Scientists Turn Skin Cells Into Motor Neurons in ALS Patients

    Scientists Turn Skin Cells Into Motor Neurons in ALS Patients By Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter Thursday, July 31, 2008; 12:00 AM THURSDAY, July 31 (HealthDay News) -- Scientists have turned skin cells from patients with Lou Gehrig's disease into motor neurons that are genetically identical to the patients' own neurons. An unlimited number of these neurons can now be created and studied in the laboratory, a capability which should result in a better understanding of the disease and, one day, lead to new treatments or even the production of healthy cells that can replace the diseased ones. "The hope of some scientists is that they might be able to harness stem cells and program them to generate pluripotent stem cell lines [capable of differentiating into many different types of cells] which have the genes of patients," said Kevin Eggan, co-author of a paper appearing July 31 in the online version ofScience. "This would open up the possibility of producing a large supply of immune-matched cells to that patient that could be used in transplantation methodologies." "The other hope, and one that's much closer upon us . is if you could produce the cell types that become sick in that person, you might be able to use them in the laboratory to come to understand basic aspects of the disease and take the study of disease out of patients, where it's very difficult, and put it into the Petri dish," added Eggan, who is a principal faculty member at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute and spoke about the research at a teleconference Wednesday.
  • Reopening Avenues for Attacking Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 15 July 2016, by Hannah L

    Reopening Avenues for Attacking Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 15 July 2016, by Hannah L

    Reopening avenues for attacking amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 15 July 2016, by Hannah L. Robbins plays an important role in not only the nervous system, but also the blood and immune systems. "The point of our paper was to determine the function of this gene and what it normally helps to do in the body," said lead author Kevin Eggan, a professor in Harvard's Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology (HSCRB) and an HSCI principal faculty member who has been studying ALS for more than a decade. According to Eggan, one way to better understand the gene is to catalog what is missing or goes awry when it is "knocked out," or inactivated. The scientists found that mice without a functional copy of the gene C9ORF72 had abnormally large spleens, livers, and lymph nodes, and got sick and In the murine spleen, lymphoid tissue (purple) is died. Mice with one working copy experienced responsible for launching an immune response to blood- similar but less severe changes. born antigens, while red pulp (pink) filters the blood. Mutations in the C9ORF72 gene, the most common mutation found in ALS patients, can inflame lymphoid "I realized immediately that the mouse knockout tissue and contribute to immune system dysfunction. had immune dysfunction," said Leonard Zon, a Credit: Dan Mordes, Eggan lab, Harvard Stem Cell professor in HSCRB, after seeing the preliminary Institute data at an informal presentation. The research team predicted that the gene mutation would affect neurons, but the finding that it Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) researchers at also inflamed other cells, namely those involved in Harvard University and the Broad Institute of autoimmunity, was "unexpected." With input from Harvard and MIT have found evidence that bone Zon and immunologist Luigi Notarangelo of Boston marrow transplantation may one day be beneficial Children's Hospital, the team decided to change to a subset of patients suffering from amyotrophic direction and further explore the gene's impact on lateral sclerosis (ALS), a fatal neurodegenerative the immune system.
  • A Concise Review on the Classification and Nomenclature of Stem Cells Kök Hücrelerinin S›N›Fland›R›Lmas› Ve Isimlendirilmesine Iliflkin K›Sa Bir Derleme

    A Concise Review on the Classification and Nomenclature of Stem Cells Kök Hücrelerinin S›N›Fland›R›Lmas› Ve Isimlendirilmesine Iliflkin K›Sa Bir Derleme

    Review 57 A concise review on the classification and nomenclature of stem cells Kök hücrelerinin s›n›fland›r›lmas› ve isimlendirilmesine iliflkin k›sa bir derleme Alp Can Ankara University Medical School, Department of Histology and Embryology, Ankara, Turkey Abstract Stem cell biology and regenerative medicine is a relatively young field. However, in recent years there has been a tremen- dous interest in stem cells possibly due to their therapeutic potential in disease states. As a classical definition, a stem cell is an undifferentiated cell that can produce daughter cells that can either remain a stem cell in a process called self-renew- al, or commit to a specific cell type via the initiation of a differentiation pathway leading to the production of mature progeny cells. Despite this acknowledged definition, the classification of stem cells has been a perplexing notion that may often raise misconception even among stem cell biologists. Therefore, the aim of this brief review is to give a conceptual approach to classifying the stem cells beginning from the early morula stage totipotent embryonic stem cells to the unipotent tissue-resident adult stem cells, also called tissue-specific stem cells. (Turk J Hematol 2008; 25: 57-9) Key words: Stem cells, embryonic stem cells, tissue-specific stem cells, classification, progeny. Özet Kök hücresi biyolojisi ve onar›msal t›p görece yeni alanlard›r. Buna karfl›n, son y›llarda çeflitli hastal›klarda tedavi amac›yla kullan›labilme potansiyelleri nedeniyle kök hücrelerine ola¤anüstü bir ilgi art›fl› vard›r. Klasik tan›m›yla kök hücresi, kendini yenileme ad› verilen mekanizmayla farkl›laflmadan kendini ço¤altan veya bir dizi farkl›laflma aflamas›ndan geçerek olgun hücrelere dönüflebilen hücrelerdir.
  • Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party Battle Over Energy Efficiency

    Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party Battle Over Energy Efficiency

    Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party Battle over Energy Efficiency Jeff Erickson, Navigant Consulting ABSTRACT Those involved in delivering or evaluating energy efficiency programs have had a reasonably comfortable relationship with environmental advocates over the years. In fact heightened environmental concerns helped spur the latest round of enthusiasm for energy efficiency among regulators and legislators. What about some of the other groups that are battling for the public’s attention lately – how might their efforts affect energy efficiency? If the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement grows how will it affect publicly-funded energy efficiency? Will utility-led energy efficiency programs be frowned upon by the OWS crowd? Will they want to see more states taking energy efficiency programs away from utilities and creating new institutions to run them (as, for example, is done in Wisconsin)? On the other side of the spectrum, will the Tea Party target energy efficiency regulations as evidence that the government has overstepped its constitutional purview? Will their push for deregulation lead to a pull back from regulations authorizing public-benefits charges to fund energy efficiency programs? This paper provides a framework for thinking about these questions and considering the potential ramifications if either of these movements grows in influence and targets energy efficiency. The paper will break the energy efficiency realm down into several parts representing key organizational or regulatory issues and consider the positions that the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street members either have already expressed or are likely to express based on their foundational principles. Introduction Some individuals, families, businesses, and public sector entities take actions on their own accord, with their own money, to improve their energy efficiency.
  • Ethical Challenges in Organoid Use

    Ethical Challenges in Organoid Use

    Article Ethical Challenges in Organoid Use Vasiliki Mollaki Hellenic National Bioethics Commission, PC 10674 Athens, Greece; [email protected] Abstract: Organoids hold great promises for numerous applications in biomedicine and biotech- nology. Despite its potential in science, organoid technology poses complex ethical challenges that may hinder any future benefits for patients and society. This study aims to analyze the multifaceted ethical issues raised by organoids and recommend measures that must be taken at various levels to ensure the ethical use and application of this technology. Organoid technology raises several serious ethics issues related to the source of stem cells for organoid creation, informed consent and privacy of cell donors, the moral and legal status of organoids, the potential acquisition of human “characteristics or qualities”, use of gene editing, creation of chimeras, organoid transplantation, commercialization and patentability, issues of equity in the resulting treatments, potential misuse and dual use issues and long-term storage in biobanks. Existing guidelines and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to organoids are also discussed. It is concluded that despite the serious ethical challenges posed by organoid use and biobanking, we have a moral obligation to support organoid research and ensure that we do not lose any of the potential benefits that organoids offer. In this direction, a four-step approach is recommended, which includes existing regulations and guidelines, special regulatory provisions that may be needed, public engagement and continuous monitoring of the rapid advancements in the field. This approach may help maximize the biomedical and social benefits of organoid technology and contribute to future governance models in organoid technology.
  • Unique Unique

    Unique Unique

    UNIQUE UNIQUE (ju^'ni^k) A. adj. 1. Of which there is only one; one and no other; single, sole, solitary. 2. a. That is or forms the only one of its kind; having no like or equal; standing alone in comparison with others, freq. by reason of superior excellence; unequalled, unparalleled, unrivalled. Oxford English Dictionary HSCI is a unique scientific enterprise THE HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE is a unique scientific enterprise; nowhere else in the world are as many leading scientists gathered together to specifically focus on what today is one of the most important basic question in the life sciences: What is the property that allows stem cells not only to differentiate into any cell type in the body, but also makes it possible for them to reprogram other cells? And perhaps as significant, the Harvard Stem Cell Institute is a unique scientific enterprise because it is dedicated to bringing the answers to these questions to patients’ bedsides in the form of new treatments for conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, cancer, blindness, and even dementias. scientific enterprise 4 } For a relatively brief interval ... researchers are Researchers believe that in as little as a decade it research solely on an individual lab basis, HSCI has hand, HSCI has established two major disease In 2005 HSCI provided its first dozen seed grants, intoxicated with a mix of the newly discovered may be possible to use embryonic stem cells to established collaborative platforms with other programs, the Cancer Stem Cell Program and The totaling $1.8 million, to launch innovative work by and the imaginable unknown.
  • The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning

    The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning

    Florida International University College of Law eCollections Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2000 The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning Elizabeth Price Foley Florida International University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Elizabeth Price Foley, The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning , 42 Ariz. L. Rev. 647 (2000). Available at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/413 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DATE DOWNLOADED: Mon Jul 13 16:11:09 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 20th ed. Elizabeth Price Foley, The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning, 42 Ariz. L. Rev. 647 (2000). ALWD 6th ed. Elizabeth Price Foley, The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning, 42 Ariz. L. Rev. 647 (2000). APA 7th ed. Foley, E. (2000). The constitutional implications of human cloning. Arizona Law Review, 42(3), 647-730. Chicago 7th ed. Elizabeth Price Foley, "The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning," Arizona Law Review 42, no. 3 (2000): 647-730 McGill Guide 9th ed. Elizabeth Price Foley, "The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning" (2000) 42:3 Ariz L Rev 647. MLA 8th ed. Foley, Elizabeth Price. "The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning." Arizona Law Review, vol. 42, no. 3, 2000, p. 647-730. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. Elizabeth Price Foley, 'The Constitutional Implications of Human Cloning' (2000) 42 Ariz L Rev 647 Provided by: FIU College of Law -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
  • Elizabeth Price Foley ______

    Elizabeth Price Foley ______

    Elizabeth Price Foley ______________________________________________________________________________ Professional Experience: Of Counsel, BakerHostetler, LLP, Washington, D.C., June 2014 to present. Of Counsel to Appellate and Major Motions section of national law firm, with emphasis on constitutional litigation and complex procedural issues. Professor of Law, Florida International University College of Law, Miami, Florida. Aug. 2002 to present. Tenured, founding faculty member of newly created public law school. Teach courses in constitutional law, health care law and civil procedure. Executive Director, Institute for Justice, Florida Chapter, Miami, Florida. March 2011 to Jan. 2013. Ran IJ’s newly created Florida chapter, including managing a six-figure budget, handling media and community outreach, and supervising two full-time staff attorneys, a paralegal, and several law-student interns. Also litigated constitutional claims in federal and state courts, focusing principally on areas such as economic liberty, the First Amendment, and property rights. The Institute for Justice is a non-profit, libertarian law firm based out of the Washington, D.C. area. Clinical Adjunct Professor, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida. August 2010 to August 2014. Team-taught course on Health Policy and Law to medical students. Provide annual lectures to medical students on various health law- related topics (e.g., health care fraud and abuse; medical malpractice; health care policymaking). Professor of Law, Michigan State University College of Law, East Lansing, Michigan. June 2000 to July 2002. Tenured professor. Taught courses in civil procedure, health care law, law and medicine, food and drug law, and evidence. Untenured Associate Professor from 1996-2000. Adjunct Professor, College of Human Medicine, Center for Ethics & Humanities, Michigan State University, Sept.