Analysis of Internal Party Democracy of Indian National Congress, Bharatiya Janata Party and Asom Gana Parishad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of Internal Party Democracy of Indian National Congress, Bharatiya Janata Party and Asom Gana Parishad International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 2, (2020), pp. 4453 - 4462 Analysis of Internal Party Democracy of Indian National Congress, Bharatiya Janata Party and Asom Gana Parishad Ila deka Research scholar, Department of Political Science, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India Abstract Intra-party democracy is an essential ingredient of good democratic practice of political parties. Since it ensures the participation of all members, it is essential for any political party of any democratic country to ensure intra-party democracy. It is because when a decision is taken by some on behalf of others, participatory democracy will lose its very essence. One of the most important ways to secure intra party democracy within political parties is the intra-party electoral systems and procures. Therefore, it is important to make the election process within parties inclusive, transparent and democratic. A democratic party should always believe in democratic principles while dealing with internal businesses of the party and therefore, should operate on the principle of social justice, gender equality and equity. This paper intends to throw a light on the understanding of the concepts of intra-party democracy and also on the process of intra-party democracy of two national Indian political parties and one regional political party of Assam. Introduction The concept of intra-party democracy is broadly used in the political science literature. The concept essentially means that there is a need for the political parties to be democratic in their organization in various aspects such as the definition of policy positions or the selection of candidates for parliamentary cabinet or internal positions. It is essential for any political party to be democratic as it promotes party unity that further reducesfragmentation and factionalism. It also encourages the process of collective ownership of decisions and a culture of democratic debate and deliberation where the party workers have the scope to discuss every critical issue within the party organization. Objectives: The objectives of this present study are- 1) To make an understanding about the concept of intra-party democracy. 2) To examine the process of intra-party democracy of two main national Indian political parties, namely the Indian National Congress (INC) and the Bhartaiya Janata Party (BJP) and one regional political party of Assam namely Asom Gana Parishad (AGP). ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 4453 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 2, (2020), pp. 4453 - 4462 Method of data collection: The required information is obtained from secondary sources such as books, journals, newspapers, memorandums, pamphlets, party proceedings and manifestoes, archival records both official and non-official and other internet sources. The method of historical analysis is employed to find out the research objectives proposed in the paper. Findigs: Intra-party democracy basically means democracy within a party. A party which makes it possible for all its members right from the grass root level to get involved in its decision making process can be termed as internally democratic. All the party proceedings are held in a democratic way in the parties when they are internally democratic. Existence of intra-party democracy encourages a party to develop a wider democratic culture which clearly believes in decentralisation. A democratic party should always ensure the participation of all sections of society without any discrimination based on sex, class, caste or race. It is also necessary for such a party to embrace the principle that women’s rights are human rights and should allow everyone to exercise their civil and political rights where everyone is made enable to stand for elections within their political structures and to effectively participate in the mainstream activities of the party without fear of intimidation. The exercise of these democratic principles and procedures would bridge the gaps between various groups of the party to participate efficiently in the party activities and programmes. It is well known to everyone that a modern democracy needs well- structured political parties. These well- structures parties should represent the will and interest of its citizens and it is very much clear that unless and until the parties do not follow these democratic principles within their party structures they can never serve its citizens regardless class, caste, sex or race. Only the parties which ensures its members to act freely, independently and adequately can be the voice of all sections of society. Therefore, it is important to take a closer look not only on the political visions, goals or ideas of the political parties, but also on their internal debates and discussions, their internal processes and procedures, internal organizations, the conflicts within different members of the party and the involvement of the members in the party activities. Only when the parties show their commitment to the democratic principles in their own organizations, they can fulfil their duties to their citizens with a clear commitment and dedication. It is believed that to promote democracy in a society and largely in a country, political parties must be internally democratic. It is because political parties are essential for the efficient and proper functioning of any democracy. Hence, they are instrumental for democratizing and consolidating democracy. Any political party’s ability depends on their organizational structure, behaviour and efficacy.Intra- ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 4454 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 2, (2020), pp. 4453 - 4462 party democracy has always been a challenge in democracies. Moreover in these countries, party democracy has mainly been analyzed and valued in terms of party’s contribution to the development of the overall democratic processes. There are many ways through which we can maintain intra party democracy of political parties. Some of these are discussed below- 1) Party leadership should be equal to each and everyone within the party starting from villages up to the national level. All the ‘ordinary’ party members should be respected by the party leadership. The different opinions on the basic party program should be tolerated. 2) To avoid a situation of conflict, the elections of the party should have a clear time frame. 3) To avoid unnecessary conflicts on leadership positions and faction fighting, the parties should institutionalize succession planning on the basis of consensus of members from all levels. 4) For the leaders, party interests should be above personal interests and he must be accountable to the party rank and file. 5) Parties should take action that aim at empowering marginalized social groups such as women, the youth and the people with disabilities.Participation of all members in the internal matters of the party should be promoted. It should be made possible for all the party members to voice their opinions within the party. 6) There should be compliance with the rules and regulations for membership participation and decision making processes within the party. The process of intra-party democracy of the INC, BJP and AGP India is regarded as the largest representative democracy in the world. Any Indian citizen has the right to contest elections if he/she fulfils the basic criteria set by the Constitution of India. All the political parties in India that contest elections have some organizational structure of their own. The structure and the strength of the parties depend on the nature and size of the party. Based on its nature parties can vary from formal to very formal or dependent on just one person. To illustrate, all major political parties in India have a constitution which prescribes membership details, organizational structure and leadership and selection of office bearers, however there is a gap between the constitution and its actual implementation. The constitution of both the Indian National Congress (INC) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) do not cover the candidate nomination process at all. In India, no party follows a clear process to nominate candidates. Only committee of a few members finalizes the nomination process. Secondly, the process of ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 4455 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 2, (2020), pp. 4453 - 4462 organizing elections for party leadership and office bearers and reporting them to the Election Commission of India seems to be a formality in most parties and is poorly implemented. Third, the main parties of India do not incorporate ways to involve party members in decision making process and do not give the grassroots workers the opportunities of a say in the candidate selection process. However, it is also seen that in most of the cases the senior leaders of the parties or their close associates contest the election in most of the constituencies where grass root workers have a very little say. There is no official standard of INC and BJP regarding the selection method of candidates asthe Constitutions of both the parties are largely silent on selection methods. The lack of inclusiveness and high level of centralization in the ticket distribution process has always been present in the political parties in India that creates differences between parties and candidates. The final choice of candidate selection is almost always made by smaller, national executive bodies though it is carried out with the inputs from the local leaders. Ordinary members have a very little say in the national affairs of the party and their activities are limited only with the lowest level of committees. The process of internal party democracy of INC, BJP and AGP is discussed below- Indian National Congress (INC) The Indian National Congress (INC) formed in 1885 by the British civil servant Allan Octavian Hume has been the only influential and the ruling party for many decades in the post-independence India. It is functioning as the main opposition party in the today’s Indian Political context.
Recommended publications
  • Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2019/05 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee Amory Gethin Thomas Piketty March 2019 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee, Amory Gethin, Thomas Piketty* January 16, 2019 Abstract This paper combines surveys, election results and social spending data to document the long-run evolution of political cleavages in India. From a dominant- party system featuring the Indian National Congress as the main actor of the mediation of political conflicts, Indian politics have gradually come to include a number of smaller regionalist parties and, more recently, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These changes coincide with the rise of religious divisions and the persistence of strong caste-based cleavages, while education, income and occupation play little role (controlling for caste) in determining voters’ choices. We find no evidence that India’s new party system has been associated with changes in social policy. While BJP-led states are generally characterized by a smaller social sector, switching to a party representing upper castes or upper classes has no significant effect on social spending. We interpret this as evidence that voters seem to be less driven by straightforward economic interests than by sectarian interests and cultural priorities. In India, as in many Western democracies, political conflicts have become increasingly focused on identity and religious-ethnic conflicts
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of RECOGNISED NATIONAL PARTIES (As on 11.01.2017)
    LIST OF RECOGNISED NATIONAL PARTIES (as on 11.01.2017) Sl. Name of the Name of President/ Address No. Party General secretary 1. Bahujan Samaj Ms. Mayawati, Ms. Mayawati, Party President President Bahujan Samaj Party 4, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi –110001. 2. Bharatiya Janata Shri Amit Anilchandra Shri Amit Anilchandra Shah, Party Shah, President President Bharatiya Janata Party 11, Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 110001 3. Communist Party Shri S. Sudhakar Reddy, Shri S. Sudhakar Reddy, of India General Secretary General Secretary, Communist Party of India Ajoy Bhawan, Kotla Marg, New Delhi – 110002. 4. Communist Party Shri Sitaram Yechury, Shri Sitaram Yechury, of General Secretary General Secretary India (Marxist) Communist Party of India (Marxist) ,A.K.Gopalan Bhawan,27-29, Bhai Vir Singh Marg (Gole Market), New Delhi - 110001 5. Indian National Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Congress President President Indian National Congress 24,Akbar Road, New Delhi – 110011 6. Nationalist Shri Sharad Pawar, Shri Sharad Pawar, Congress Party President President Nationalist Congress Party 10, Bishambhar Das Marg, New Delhi-110001. 7. All India Ms. Mamta Banerjee, All India Trinamool Congress, Trinamool Chairperson 30-B, Harish Chatterjee Street, Congress Kolkata-700026 (West Bengal). LIST OF STATE PARTIES (as on 11.01.2017) S. No. Name of the Name of President/ Address party General Secretary 1. All India Anna The General Secretary- No. 41, Kothanda Raman Dravida Munnetra in-charge Street, Chennai-600021, Kazhagam (Tamil Nadu). (Puratchi Thalaivi Amma), 2. All India Anna The General Secretary- No.5, Fourth Street, Dravida Munnetra in-charge Venkatesware Nagar, Kazhagam (Amma), Karpagam Gardens, Adayar, Chennai-600020, (Tamil Nadu).
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Coalition Era Over in Indian Politics? Adnan Farooquia & E
    This article was downloaded by: [Columbia University] On: 06 December 2014, At: 19:49 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctrt20 Is the Coalition Era Over in Indian Politics? Adnan Farooquia & E. Sridharanb a Department of Political Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India b University of Pennsylvania Institute for the Advanced Study of India, New Delhi, India Published online: 04 Dec 2014. Click for updates To cite this article: Adnan Farooqui & E. Sridharan (2014): Is the Coalition Era Over in Indian Politics?, The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2014.988457 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalism and Regional Parties MODULE - 4
    Regionalism and Regional Parties MODULE - 4 20 REGIONALISM AND Notes REGIONAL PARTIES One of the notable features of the Indian Party System is the presence of a large number of regional parties. By regional party we mean a party which generally operates within a limited geographical area and its activities are confined only to a single or handful of states. Further as compared to the broad ranging diverse interests of national parties, the regional parties represent the interest of a particular area. In simple words, regional parties differ from All India parties both in terms of their outlook as well as the interests they pursue. Their activities are focused on specific issues concerning the region and they operate within the limited area. They merely seek to capture power at the state or regional level and do not aspire to control the national government. It is noteworthy that in India, the number of regional parties is much larger than the national parties and some of the States are being ruled by the regional parties, viz., Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Assam, Jammu & Kashmir etc. Objectives After studying this lesson, you will be able to l analyse the factors responsible for the growth of regionalism; l determine the factors instrumental for the growth of regional parties; l create awareness about the role of regional parties; l distinguish a regional party from a national party. 20.1 What is Regionalism The term ‘regionalism’ has two connotations. In the negative sense, it implies excessive attachment to one’s region is preference to the country or the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Regional Parties?: Clientelism, Elites, and the Indian Party System Adam Ziegfeld Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11868-3 - Why Regional Parties?: Clientelism, Elites, and the Indian Party System Adam Ziegfeld Index More information Index 2014 election (India) Argentina Bharatiya Janata Party and, electoral success clientelism in, 120 of, 189–90 Peronist Party in, 68 coalition era after, durability of, 188–9 regional parties in, 11, 33 regional parties after, 189–90 Asom Gana Parishad (AGP), 38, 40 SPM government following, 187–90 as opportunistic faction, 230 regional support for, 94 Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), 31, 48–9 Assam (state) programmatic politics and, 89–90 opportunistic factions in, 223–4 African party systems, 19 regional parties in, 98, 180, 214 agrarian national parties. See Janata Dal Australia, regional parties in, 33 Akali Dal. See Shiromani Akali Dal autonomist parties. See regionalist parties All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), 38–9, 182 backward caste. See Other Backward Classes Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar) and, Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), 20, 31, 48, 161 107 clientelistic strategies of, 63 All India Communist Party, 161–2 electoral success of, 180 All India Forward Bloc (AIFB), 44–5, 163 programmatic politics and, 88–9 All India Indira Congress (Tiwari), Scheduled Caste voters and, 87 43, 177 Bandhopadhyay, Debabrata, 110 All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen Banerjee, Mamata, 186–7 (AIMIM), 25, 47 Bangla Congress (BAC), 43, 162, 186–7 All India N. R. Congress (AINRC), 49 Berhampore, 110–11 All India Trinamool Congress (AITC), 43, 199, bhadralok castes, 247–8, 250 233 Bhajan
    [Show full text]
  • List of Contesting Candidates
    PHASE- I Conduct of Electiomn Rules, 1961 (Statutory Rules and Order) [FORM 7-A] (See Rule 10 (1)) LIST OF CONTESTING CANDIDATES Election to the *House of the People from the 9-TEZPUR HP Constituencies Sl. No. Name of candidate Address of Candidates @Party affiliation Symbol Allotted 1 2 3 4 5 1) Candidate of Recognised National and State Political Parties Vill- Bhogpur PO:- Bhogpur Chariali Dist. Indian National Congress 1 BHUPEN KUMAR BORAH HAND Lakhimpur (Assam) Vill- Dhekiajuli Town, Ward No.1, P.O- Asom Gana Parishad 2 JOSEPH TOPPO Dhekiajuli Dist.-Sonitpur(Assam) Pin No. ELEPHANT 784110 Vill- Kacharibasti, P.O - Bharatiya Janata Party 3 RAM PRASAD SARMAH LOTUS Ulubari,Guwahati(Assam) Vill- Toubhanga PO- Toubhanga PS- Communist Party of India (Marxist) HAMMER , SICKLE 4 KHEMRAJ CHETRY Jamugurihat Dist: Sonitpur(Assam) AND STAR 2) Candidates of Registered Political Parties (other than Recognised National and State Political Parties) Vill- Industrial Area Gotlong PO- Kalia All India Trinamool Congress 5 GOPI CHAND SHAHABADI FLOWERS & GRASS Bhomora Dist. Sonitpur (Assam) Vill- Depota PS- Tezpur Dist.- Sonitpur(Assam) All India Forward Bloc 6 RAJEN SAIKIA LION Vill-NC Bargang PO-Bargang Dist.- Communist Party of India (Marxist- FLAG WITH THREE 7 LAKSHIKANTA KURMI Sonitpur(Assam) Laninist)(Liberation) STARS 3) Other Candidates Vill-Jyotinagar Majgaon P.O- Nilkamal P.S- Independent 8 ELIAS KUJUR BRIEF CASE Tezpur Dist. Sonitpur(Assam) Vill-Harmoti P.O- merbil District- Independent 9 MONI KUMAR SUBBA CUP & SAUCER Lakhimpur(Assam) Page 1 of 19 Sl. No. Name of candidate Address of Candidates @Party affiliation Symbol Allotted 1 2 3 4 5 Election to the *House of the People from the 11-KLIABOR HP Constituencies 1) Candidate of Recognised National and State Political Parties 1 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • How the 2004 Lok Sabha Election Was Lost
    July 2004 How the 2004 Lok Sabha election was lost Gareth Price Summary • Surprise at the outcome of the 2004 Indian general election was more pronounced because of the confidence of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that it would be returned to power. The government had taken the decision to call an early election from what it thought was a position of strength. In retrospect, its complacency proved to be its undoing. The government’s “India Shining” message played to its core supporters and, in effect, encouraged the rejection of poorly-performing MPs. The BJP’s over- confidence led it to alienate its allies, while Congress, which expected to lose, was keener to formalise alliances. • While the BJP performed poorly, its remaining allies in the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) performed worse. In just two states, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, the NDA lost 51 seats, the bulk of the seats being lost by the BJP’s regional allies. Although the BJP benefitted from anti- incumbency in some states, had it maintained its existing alliances and articulated a more inclusive message there is little doubt that it would have remained the largest party, changing the entire political dynamic. • The new government faces a host of challenges. Its survival will depend on how members of the coalition balance their desire for secular government with the implementation of their particular economic or social policies. Congress’ ability to manage a coalition, particularly in the run-up to state elections, and personal ambitions of other politicians within the coalition will also determine whether the government survives.
    [Show full text]
  • Assam Postpoll 2021-Survey Findings Jun 2
    Assam Post Poll 2021-Survey Findings About the Survey : The Post Poll survey was conducted between March 28 and April 21, 2021 among 3473 voters at 140 polling stations spread across 35 constituencies of the State. The sampling design adopted was multi-stage systematic random sampling. The Assembly Constituencies were randomly selected using the probability proportional to size method. Thereafter, four polling stations within each of the sampled constituencies were selected using the systematic random sampling method. Within each polling station, 40 voters were randomly sampled from the electoral roll using the systematic random sampling method. Of these 40, 25 interviews were targeted. The interviews of electors were conducted face-to-face at their homes after voting had taken place in their area. The findings shown here have been weighted by gender, religion, locality, and caste group based on Census 2011 data and by the eventual vote shares secured by the main alliances - BJP-AGP+ alliance, the Mahajot (Congress-AIUDF-Left+ alliance), and the Asom Jatiya Parishad-Raijor Dal+ alliance - in the election. Q1: Some people here told us that they could not vote in the just held Vidhan Sabha elections. How about you - were you able to vote or not? N (%) 1: Yes, Voted 3258 93.8 2: No, Could not vote 194 5.6 8: No response 21 .6 Total 3473 100.0 a: (If answer is ‘1. Voted’ in Q1 ) So which party or candidate did you vote for from this assembly constituency? N (%) Valid (%) Valid 01: Indian National Congress (INC) 894 25.7 27.4 02: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) 1136 32.7 34.9 03: Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) 184 5.3 5.6 04: All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) 405 11.7 12.4 05: Bodoland People’s Front (BPF) 44 1.3 1.3 06.
    [Show full text]
  • Factional Politics in Assam: a Study on the Asom Gana Parishad
    Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Doctoral Thesis Factional Politics in Assam: A Study on the Asom Gana Parishad Dipak Kumar Sarma Registration No. 09614110 Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the discipline of Political Science Supervisors: Prof. Abu Nasar Saied Ahmed & Prof. Archana Barua Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Guwahati-781039, Assam, India August, 2017 Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Guwahati - 781039 Assam, India Declaration I hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Factional Politics in Assam: A study on the Asom Gana Parishad” , is the outcome of my research duly carried out in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS), Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, under the joint supervision of Prof. Abu Nasar Saied Ahmed and Prof. Archana Barua. The academic investigations and reporting of the scientific observations are in conformity with the general norms and standard of research. This thesis or any part of it has not been submitted to any other University/Institute or elsewhere for the award of any other degree or diploma. IIT Guwahati (Dipak Kumar Sarma) Date: August, 2017 Research Scholar TH-1788_09614110 Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Guwahati - 781039 Assam, India Certificate This is to certify that Mr. Dipak Kumar Sarma has prepared the thesis entitled “Factional Politics in Assam: A study on the Asom Gana Parishad” for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science at the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences of Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati.
    [Show full text]
  • Become a Political Issue in Indian Politics?
    Why Has “Development” Become a Political Issue in Indian Politics? Aseema Sinha Wagener Chair of South Asian Politics Claremont McKenna College Most observers of India have an implicit model of how Indians vote.1 They assume that voters in India act on their primary identities, such as caste or community, and that parties seek votes based on group identities—called vote banks—that can be collated into majorities and coalitions. K.C. Suri articu- lates the logic of this dominant model: 189 People of this country vote more on the basis of emotional issues or primordial loyalties, such as caste, religion, language or region and less on the basis of policies. The victory or defeat of a party depends on how a party or leaders marshal support by appealing to these sentiments or forge coalitions of groups and parties based on these feelings. People of India, unlike in the West, do not think and act as classes, and they vote for the party or leader they think their own, regardless of its or his policies.2 Scholarship on India has accumulated strong evidence that elections are per- meated by caste, language, religion, and identity politics.3 The prominence of parties such as the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Aseema Sinha is the Wagener Chair of South Asian Politics at Claremont McKenna College. She previ- ously taught at University of Wisconsin-Madison and was a Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C. Her research interests relate to the political economy of India, India-China comparisons, international organizations, and the rise of India as an emerging power.
    [Show full text]
  • Mise En Page 1
    Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2009 CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS VOLUME 43 Published annually in English and French since 1967, the Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections reports on all national legislative elections held throughout the world during a given year. It includes information on the electoral system, the back- ground and outcome of each election as well as statistics on the results, distri- bution of votes and distribution of seats according to political group, sex and age. The information contained in the Chronicle can also be found in the IPU's data- base on national parliaments, PARLINE. PARLINE is accessible on the IPU web site (http://www.ipu.org/parline) and is continually updated. Inter-Parliamentary Union VOLUME 43 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Geneva – Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 41 50 Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 2009 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org 2009 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections VOLUME 43 1 January - 31 December 2009 © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2010 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X Photo credits Front cover: Photo AFP/Pascal Pavani Back cover: Photo AFP/Tugela Ridley Inter-Parliamentary Union Office of the Permanent Observer of 5, chemin du Pommier the IPU to the United Nations Case postale 330 220 East 42nd Street CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Suite 3002 Geneva — Switzerland New York, N.Y. 10017 USA Tel.: + 41 22 919 41 50 Tel.: +1 212 557 58 80 Fax:
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations Full Form AAP Aam Aadmi Party ABHM
    Abbreviations Full form AAP Aam Aadmi Party ABHM/ ABHMS/HMS Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha AJBP Ajeya Bharat Party AD Apna Dal ADMK All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam AGIMK Agila India Makkal Kazhagam AGP Asom Gana Parishad AIFB/FBL All India Forward Bloc AIMIM/MIM All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul Muslimeen AINRC All India N.R. Congress AITC/TRMC All India Trinamool Congress AIUDF All India United Democratic Front AJSU All Jharkhand Students Union AMB Amra Bangalee AMMK Anaithu Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam ANC Ambedkar National Congress AOP Aama Odisha Party APOI/API Ambedkarite Party of India ARP Ambedkarist Republican Party ARPS Andhra Rastra Praja Samithi AWVP Awami Vikas Party BBM Bharipa Bahujan Mahasangh BCUF B. C. United Front BDJS Bharath Dharma Jana Sena BHSMP Bharatiya Sant Mat Party BJD Biju Janata Dal BJJD Bhartiya Jantantrik Janata Dal BJP Bharatiya Janata Party BJS Bharatiya Jan Sangh BMP /BMUP Bahujan Mukti Party BMSM Bharatiya Minorities Suraksha Mahasangh BNS Bhartiya Navjawan Sena (Paksha) BPF Bodoland Peoples Front BSCP Bhartiya Shakti Chetna Party BSP Bahujan Samaj Party BSP(A) Bahujan Samaj Party (Ambedkar) BVA Bahujan Vikas Aaghadi BVM Bharat Vikas Morcha CMP/CMP (J) Communist Marxist party Cong(S) Congress (Secular) CPI Communist Party of India CPI(ML) Red Star Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Red Star CPIML (L) Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation CPM Communist Party of India (Marxist) DABP Dalita Bahujana Party DJP Delhi Janta Party DMDK Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam DMK Dravida Munnetra
    [Show full text]