DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) GCF FP ARG ANNEX 3 Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Annex to the Funding Proposal Argentina REDD-plus RBP for results period 2014-2016 within the framework of the GCF Pilot Programme for REDD+ Results-based Payments 01 October 2020 | 1 Argentina REDD-plus RBP for results period 2014-2016 Funding Proposal Annex 2: ESMF Report Contents TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2 CONTEXT - NATIVE FORESTS IN ARGENTINA ......................................................................................... 10 2.1 NATIVE FOREST COVER AND PRESSURES ON NATIVE FORESTS ................................................................................ 10 2.2 LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................. 12 2.3 NATIONAL ACTION PLAN ON FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE .............................................................................. 20 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE, OUTPUTS AND ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................. 22 3.2 PROJECT BENEFICIARIES AND BENEFITS DISTRIBUTION SCHEME .............................................................................. 27 3.2.1 Benefits distribution scheme ......................................................................................................... 30 3.3 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ 31 3.4 PROJECT COST AND FINANCING ...................................................................................................................... 38 4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE ............................................................................................. 41 4.1 DESCRIPTION BY FOREST REGION .................................................................................................................... 41 4.1.1 Paranense Rainforest .................................................................................................................... 41 4.1.2 Argentine Yungas .......................................................................................................................... 42 4.1.3 Parque Chaqueño .......................................................................................................................... 43 4.1.4 Argentine Espinal .......................................................................................................................... 44 4.1.5 Andean Patagonian Forest ........................................................................................................... 45 4.1.6 Argentine Monte ........................................................................................................................... 46 4.2 PROTECTED AREAS ....................................................................................................................................... 47 4.3 POVERTY AND LAND TENURE CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................. 48 5 APPLICABLE SAFEGUARDS STANDARDS AND RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...................................... 49 5.1 CONSISTENCY OF GCF AND FAO SAFEGUARDS STANDARDS ................................................................................. 49 5.2 GCF POLICY ON AVOIDANCE OF PROHIBITED PRACTICES ....................................................................................... 51 5.2.1 Relevant legal framework ............................................................................................................. 52 5.3 FAO SAFEGUARDS FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................... 53 5.3.1 FAO risk screening ......................................................................................................................... 55 5.3.2 Safeguards information and disclosure ........................................................................................ 64 5.4 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISMS ................................................................................................................ 65 5.4.1 GCF independent Redress Mechanism .......................................................................................... 65 5.4.2 GRM at the AE level: FAO’s Guidelines for Compliance Reviews Following the Organization's Environmental and Social Standards ........................................................................................................... 65 5.4.3 GRM at the project activities level ................................................................................................ 66 5.5 UNFCCC SAFEGUARDS FOR REDD+ ............................................................................................................... 73 5.5.1 Relevant legal framework ............................................................................................................. 75 6 POTENTIAL RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................... 79 6.1 PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES TO MITIGATE IMPACTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................... 79 6.1.1 Defining and screening sub-activities ........................................................................................... 81 6.2 ARGENTINA ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT WHICH SUBPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES ARE SUBJECT TO .................. 82 6.2.1 Provincial regulations of the EIA system ....................................................................................... 84 | 2 Argentina REDD-plus RBP for results period 2014-2016 Funding Proposal Annex 2: ESMF Report 6.3 FAO ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS FOR MODERATE RISK PROJECTS ................................. 85 6.4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RISK AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RELATED MITIGATION MEASURES FOR PROJECT COMPONENTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 87 6.5 EXCLUSIONS LIST ....................................................................................................................................... 104 6.6 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE ESMF ............................... 106 7 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................. 107 7.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT FOR THE PANBYCC AND THIS PROPOSAL ................................................................ 110 7.1.1 Participation and socialization process of the proposal Argentina REDD-plus RBP for results period 2014-2016 ...................................................................................................................................... 113 7.1.2 The dialogue and exchange process will continue with the various stakeholders, with follow up meetings with COFEMA and INAI already organized for the month of October to share update on the upcoming B27. Other meetings and coordination actions will follow. Planned stakeholder capacity building and engagement during project implementation ....................................................................... 117 7.2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVITIES ............................................................... 119 7.3 GENDER ANALYSIS AND ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................... 120 8 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES PLANNING FRAMEWORK ................................................................................ 121 8.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 121 8.2 RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................... 123 8.3 CONSULTATIONS WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES .................................................................................................. 125 8.3.1 Projected participatory process with indigenous peoples and local communities ...................... 127 8.4 RELEVANT INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS ................................................................................................ 128 8.5 GENDER AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary
    Environmental, Social, and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA) for Vista Onshore Operations Executive Summary 24 June 2019 Project No.: 0510093 The business of sustainability Document details The details entered below are automatically shown on the cover and the main page footer. PLEASE NOTE: This table must NOT be removed from this document. Document title Environmental, Social, and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA) for Vista Onshore Operations Document subtitle Executive Summary Project No. 0510093 Date 24 June 2019 Version 01 Author Luis Dingevan / Silvana Prado / Lisset Saenz Client Name Vista Oil & Gas Document history ERM approval to issue Version Revision Author Reviewed by Name Date Comments Draft 00 Luis Dingevan Natalia Alfrido 19/06/2019 Borrador a Vista / Silvana Delgado / Wagner Prado / Lisset Andrea Saenz Fernandez FInal 01 Luis Dingevan Natalia Alfrido 24/06/2019 / Silvana Delgado / Wagner Prado / Lisset Andrea Saenz Fernandez www.erm.com Version: 01 Project No.: 0510093 Client: Vista Oil & Gas 24 June 2019 Signature Page 24 June 2019 Environmental, Social, and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA) for Vista Onshore Operations Executive Summary [Double click to insert signature] [Double click to insert signature] Alfrido Wagner Andrea Fernandez Sanday Partner in Charge Project Manager ERM Argentina S.A. Av. Cabildo 2677, Piso 6° (C1428AAI) Buenos Aires, Argentina © Copyright 2019 by ERM Worldwide Group Ltd and / or its affiliates (“ERM”). All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of ERM. www.erm.com Version: 01 Project No.: 0510093 Client: Vista Oil & Gas 24 June 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESHIA) FOR VISTA ONSHORE OPERATIONS Executive Summary CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Argentine Repu,blic.,,-:, Biodiversit CosevaknPrjc Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized * Project -Document. Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORL.-DAINK GEF Documentation The Global Environment Facility (GEF) assistsdeveloping countries to protect the globalenvironment in four areas:global warming, pollution of internationalwaters-, destructionof biodiversity,and depletion of the ozone layer. The GEF is jointlyimplemented bytheUnited Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Environment Programme, andthe World Bank: GEF Project Documents - identifiedby a greenband - prpvideextended project- specific information.The implementing agency responsible for each.projectis identified by its logoon the coverof thedocument. GjobalEnvironment-Division EnvironmentDepartment . World-Bank 1818 H Street,NW Washington,DC 20433 Telephone:(202) 473-1816 Fax:(202) 522-3256 Report No. 17023-AR Argentine Republic Biodiversity Conservation Project ProjectDocument September 1997 Country Management Unit Argentina, Chile and Uruguay Latin America and the Caribbean Region CURRENCY EOUIVALENTS Currency Unit - Peso (Arg$) EXCHANGE RATE (September 16, 1997) US$1.00 Arg$1.00 Arg$1.00 = US$1.00 FISCALYEAR January 1 to December 31 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES The metric system has been used throughout the memorandum. Vice President: Mr. Shahid Javed Burki Director: Ms. Myma Alexander Acting Sector Leader: Mr. Luis Coirolo Team Leader: Mr. Robert Kirmse This report is basedon an AppraisalMission carried out in July 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • The East Bolivian Andes
    UNIVERSITY Or CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN GEOGRAPHY Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 85-210, 23 pltleg, 12 figures In text, I nup November 10, 1126 THE EAST BOLIVIAN ANDES 8OUTH OF THE RIO GRANDE OR GUAPAY BT OSCAR BCHMIRDER INTRODUCTION My first expedition into Bolivia was undertaken in July, 1924, from La Quiaca, the northern railway terminus of the Argentine Republic. This small town on the Argentine-Bolivian border was especially convenient as a starting point, since a railroad from La Quiaca to Tupisa, and also an automobile road to Tarija, had lately been completed. Thus two new routes into Bolivia were available. Fully as important was the resultant fact that the muleteers, or arrieros, of the northern frontier had in large part lost their occu- pation, so that mules and men were to be had promptly and moot reasonably—a decisive consideration, as these studies were under- taken on my own limited means. That I always had proper animals for mountain travel, and in particular that I had as arriero Martin Maizares of Yavi, to whom all difficulties of the road yielded, was due to the good offices of Don Francisco Thiel of La Quiaca. I traveled always with one pack mule and was accompanied by one mounted arriero. The first trip took me across the Puna to the valley of Rio San Juan del Oro (fig. 1). This valley is passable only during the dry winter months, since for long distances it is so narrow and the sides so steep that the only path is in the river bed, and the summer floods sometimes cover its whole floor for months at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean
    A Conservation Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Eric Dinerstein David M. Olson Douglas ). Graham Avis L. Webster Steven A. Primm Marnie P. Bookbinder George Ledec Public Disclosure Authorized r Published in association with The World Wildlife Fund The World Bank WWF Washington, D.C. A ConservationAssessment of the TerrestrialEcoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean Eric Dinerstein David M. Olson Douglas J. Graham Avis L. Webster Steven A. Primm Marnie P. Bookbinder George Ledec Published in association with The World Wildlife Fund The World Bank Washington, D.C. © 1995 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing September 1995 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this study are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organiza- tions, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial Analysis Approach to the Global Delineation of Dryland Areas of Relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands
    A spatial analysis approach to the global delineation of dryland areas of relevance to the CBD Programme of Work on Dry and Subhumid Lands Prepared by Levke Sörensen at the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK January 2007 This report was prepared at the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). The lead author is Levke Sörensen, scholar of the Carlo Schmid Programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Acknowledgements This report benefited from major support from Peter Herkenrath, Lera Miles and Corinna Ravilious. UNEP-WCMC is also grateful for the contributions of and discussions with Jaime Webbe, Programme Officer, Dry and Subhumid Lands, at the CBD Secretariat. Disclaimer The contents of the map presented here do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 Table of contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................3 Disclaimer ...........................................................................................................3 List of tables, annexes and maps .....................................................................5 Abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Stock in Subtropical Native Forests in a South American Protected Area
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2021. 6(2): 66–79 https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.027 CARBON STOCK IN SUBTROPICAL NATIVE FORESTS IN A SOUTH AMERICAN PROTECTED AREA Julian A. Sabattini* , Rafael A. Sabattini , Juan C. Cian , Ivan A. Sabattini National University of Entre Rios, Argentina *e-mail: [email protected] Received: 26.06.2020. Revised: 14.02.2021. Accepted: 24.02.2021. In forests, it is possible to sequester the carbon emitted by industrial activities, although global deforestation has recently increased considerably. Protected Areas make a significant contribution to mitigate negative effects of climate change. In this sense, the aim of this study is to estimate the carbon storage of the different types of subtropical native forests in the Protected Area «Estancia El Caraya» (hereinafter – PA «El Caraya»), located in the Mesopotamian Spinal. The study was carried out in the province of Entre Rios, Argentina. We evaluated the carbon stock in the soil and herbaceous, shrub and tree components of five various environments with native forests as the dominant biome. The soil component represented 81% of the carbon stock in native forest, while the remaining percentage is distributed in trees (11%), shrubs (6%), and herbaceous vegetation (2%). Native -2 -2 forest of PA «El Caraya» stores 0.974 t C × km (3.56 t CO2 × km ), 39.4% less than the world average in this conservation category. These differences are due to the high heterogeneity of the natural environments in the world due to the very diverse ecological conditions. Proper management practice of subtropical native forests in the Spinal Mesopotamian contributes highly to reduction of carbon in atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • First Density Estimation of Two Sympatric Small Cats, Leopardus Colocolo and Leopardus Geoffroyi, in a Shrubland Area of Central Argentina
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 49: 181–191 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 29 June 2012 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2012 First density estimation of two sympatric small cats, Leopardus colocolo and Leopardus geoffroyi, in a shrubland area of central Argentina Nicolás Caruso1,2,*, Claudia Manfredi1, Estela M. Luengos Vidal1, Emma B. Casanaveo1,2 & Mauro Lucherinio1,2 1) GECM, Cat. Fisiología Animal, Depto. Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia — UNS, San Juan 670, 8000 Bahía Blanca, Argentina (*corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]) 2) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ, Capital Federal, Argentina Received 5 Aug. 2011, final version received 16 Jan. 2012, accepted 17 Jan. 2012 Caruso, N., Manfredi, C., Luengos Vidal, E. M., Casanave, E. B. & Lucherini, M. 2012: First den- sity estimation of two sympatric small cats, Leopardus colocolo and Leopardus geoffroyi, in a shrubland area of central Argentina. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 49: 181–191. Geoffroy’s and Pampas cats are small felids with large distribution ranges in South America. A camera trap survey was conducted in the Espinal of central Argentina to estimate abundance based on capture–recapture data. For density estimations we used both non-spatial methods and spatially explicit capture–recapture models (SECR). For Geoffroy’s cat we also obtained density estimates from 8 radio-tracked individuals. Based on the data on 10 Geoffroy’s cats and 7 Pampas cats, non-spatial methods pro- duced density ranges of 16.21–21.94 indiv./100 km2 and 11.34–17.58 indiv./100 km2, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual Para La Planificación De La Conservación Ecorregional
    Diseño de una Geografía de la Esperanza Manual para la planificación de la conservación ecorregional Planificación ecorregional Volúmenes I y II Medición Planificación del éxito de sitios Segunda Edición Abril de 2000 Acción de conservación Diseño de una geografía de la esperanza: Manual para la planificación de la conservación ecorregional ©2000 por The Nature Conservancy Autores: Craig Groves, Laura Valutis, Diane Vosick, Betsy Neely, Kimberly Wheaton, Jerry Touval, Bruce Runnels Diseño: Nicole Rousmaniere Asistencia Editorial: Jonathan Adams, Renee Mullen, Wendy Goyert Traducción: Martha Martinez Reconocimientos: Algunos miembros de la Iniciativa Agua Dulce (Jonathan Higgins, Mary Lammert, Mark Bryer) escribieron, compilaron y revisaron el texto referente a los pasos y ejemplos relacionados con comunidades y sistemas acuáticos en todos los capítulos. Mike Beck fue el responsable de los pasos y ejemplos referentes a ambientes marinos en todos los capítulos. Jon Haferman, Terry Cook y Frank Biasi hicieron contribuciones significativas al capítulo sobre manejo de información. Kathy Bisko brindó ayuda substancial en el apéndice sobre manejo de proyectos. Se agradece especialmente a Greg Low, Karen Poiani, Jeff Baumgartner y Tim Tear por sus extensos comentarios y ayuda editorial para esta segunda edición. Las siguientes personas proporcionaron revisiones críticas de las versiones en borrador de esta guía y/o contribuyeron escribiendo ejemplos ilustrativos o porciones de algunos capítulos: Susan Anderson, Mark Ander- son, Henry Barbour, Josh Bashofin, Gary Bell, Kathy Bisko, Mark Burget, Georgina Bustamante, Steve Buttrick, Steve Chaplin, Brooke Cholvin, Pat Comer, Terry Cook, Scott Davis, Dan Dorfman, Clifton Eakes, Audrey Goddell, Denny Grossman, Jenny Hall, Alyson Heyrend, Alan Holt, Phil Hoose, Gabe Horner, John Humke, Malcolm Hunter, Fran James, Jeff Jaros-Su, Deborah Jensen, Peter Kareiva, Shyama Khanna, Sally Landaal, Amy Lester, Rob Marshall, Dave Mehlman, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Four Sympatric Cat Species in the Argentinean Monte
    Cat Project of the Month – June 2007 The IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group's website (www.catsg.org) presents each month a different cat conservation project. Members of the Cat Specialist Group are encouraged to submit a short description of interesting projects Ecology and Conservation of Four Sympatric Cat Species in the Argentinean Monte This project is aiming to contribute to the conservation of a unique and very little understood cat guild that occurs in a threatened landscape of Argentina, through the understanding of species-specific ecological requirements and interspecific interactions as well as awareness raising activities. Mauro Lucherini is a PhD Zoologist (Universitá di Siena, Italy) and he is GECM Field Coordinator (Universidad Nacional del Sur–UNS and CONICET). He is also leading a conservation biology project on the Andean mountain cats since 1998. Mauro has been a member of the Cat SG since 1998. Claudia Manfredi is a PhD Biologist at UNS; she has worked with Geoffroy’s cats since 1999. Claudia is a member of the Cat SG since 2005. [email protected]; [email protected] submitted: 1 June 2007 C. Manfredi and M. Lucherini with a live-captured Geoffroy’s Camera trap photo of a Pampas cat, Los Alamos Farm, cat (Photo GECM, UNS) Argentina (Photo GECM, UNS) The Pampas cat, Oncifelis colocolo, ranges from southern Ecuador and Peru to central, western, and southern Brazil, parts of Bolivia, central Chile, Paraguay Uruguay and southern Argentina (Sunquist and Sunquist, 2002). It has been recently up-graded to the Near Threatened IUCN category (Nowell, 2002). The Geoffroy’s cat, Oncifelis geoffroyi, is distributed from southern Bolivia and Brazil to the southern part of Patagonia in Chile and Argentina (Sunquist and Sunquist 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Nesting Birds in Roadside Borders of the Argentine Pampas: Habitat Use and Predation Risk of Artificial Nests
    Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 27(4): 261–274. ARTICLE December 2019 Ground nesting birds in roadside borders of the Argentine Pampas: habitat use and predation risk of artificial nests Daniela María Depalma1,2,3 & Myriam Emilia Mermoz1 1 Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2 Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3 Corresponding author: [email protected] Received on 19 February 2019. Accepted on 18 November 2019. ABSTRACT: Habitat loss and fragmentation have led to grassland bird declines, with ground nesters particularly vulnerable. Roadsides could provide habitat, although their suitability depends on several roadside and field characteristics. Vegetation structure determines foraging and nesting site availability. In addition, road delimits sharp edges where the activity of nest predators is usually higher, whereas herbaceous vegetation determines ground nest concealment. Trees could provide lookouts to predators, and modified habitat and woodlands in surrounding fields could offer additional resources to predators. Our objective was to assess habitat suitability for ground nester birds in roadsides belonging to one modified grassland of the Argentine Pampas. We surveyed birds (90 plots) and monitored artificial nests (60 plots) in different road types: unpaved, paved of one-lane per side, and paved of two-lanes per side. Within each road type, we evaluated the relationship that ground nesters abundance had with vegetation structure of roadsides and surrounding fields. In addition, we related predation of artificial nests with the proximity to the road, roadside vegetation, and modified land and woodlands of surrounding fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Updating the Distribution and Population Status of Jaguarundi, Puma Yagouaroundi (É
    13 4 75–79 Date 2017 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 13(4): 75–79 https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.75 Updating the distribution and population status of Jaguarundi, Puma yagouaroundi (É. Geoffroy, 1803) (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae), in the southernmost part of its distribution range E. Luengos Vidal,1, 2 M. Guerisoli,1, 3 N. Caruso,1, 3 M. Lucherini1, 3 1 GECM (Grupo de Ecología Comportamental de Mamíferos), Lab. Fisiología Animal, Depto. Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670, 8000 Bahía Blanca, Argentina. 2 INBIOSUR (Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas y Biomédicas del Sur), CONICET – UNS (Universidad Nacional del Sur), Bahía Blanca, Argentina. 3 CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Buenos Aires, Argentina Corresponding author: Luengos Vidal E., [email protected] Abstract We report new occurrence records of Puma yagouaroundi (É. Geoffroy, 1803), a widely distributed but little known Neotropical carnivore, obtained over the last 10 years in Buenos Aires province, central Argentina. The records were collected by camera trapping surveys (n = 384 stations) and 195 interviews with local inhabitants. Our results improve our understanding of this species’ geographic range, especially its southernmost limit, and abundance, and confirm the need for more detailed studies to better assess the conservation status of this species in central Argentina and other parts of its range. Key words Argentine Espinal; carnivores; abundance; camera trapping; interviews. Academic editor: Guilherme S. T. Garbino | Received 15 December 2016 | Accepted 29 March 2017 | Published 11 July 2017 Citation: Luengos Vidal E, Guerisoli M, Caruso N, Lucherini M (2017) Updating the distribution and population status of Jaguarundi, Puma yagouaroundi (É.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Evolution of the Genus Deuterocohnia Mez (Bromeliaceae)
    Systematics and evolution of the genus Deuterocohnia Mez (Bromeliaceae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) Vorgelegt im Fachbereich Naturwissenschaften der Universität Kassel von Dipl.-Biol. Nicole Schütz Kassel, 2011 Vom Fachbereich Naturwissenschaften der Universität Kassel als Dissertation angenommen. Dekan: Prof. Dr. Friedrich W. Herberg Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Kurt Weising und Prof. Dr. Georg Zizka Prüfungskommission: Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch, Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Wagner, Prof. Dr. Kurt Weising, Prof. Dr. Georg Zizka Datum der Disputation: 21.02. 2012 Content I Content 1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 1.1 Biology and systematics of the Bromeliaceae Juss......................................................1 1.2 The genus Deuterocohnia Mez................................................................................... 5 1.3 Scope of the present study .......................................................................................... 9 2 MATERIAL AND METHODS................................................................................. 11 2.1 Sources of plant material............................................................................................ 11 2.1.1 Living plant material ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Herbarium specimens....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]