DOCSLIB.ORG

Geography Research in Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geography Research in Norway Geography research in Norway An evaluation Evaluation Division for Science Geography research in Norway An evaluation Evaluation Division for Science © The Research Council of Norway 2011 The Research Council of Norway P.O.Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 OSLO Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 Telefax: +47 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.forskningsradet.no/english The report can be ordered at: www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner or green number telefax: +47 800 83 001 Design: Blanke Ark Photo/illustration: Colourbox.com Printing: 07 Gruppen / The Research Council of Norway Number of copies: 350 Oslo, February 2011 ISBN 978-82-12-02889-0 (printed version) ISBN 978-82-12-02890-6 (pdf) Preface The panel for the evaluation of geographical research in Norway hereby submits the following report to the Research Council of Norway. The panel is unanimous in its assessments, conclusions and recommendations. The evaluation is based on seven research environments where geographical research is conducted. Although the whole field of geography is encompassed the emphasis is on human geography and on the interdisciplinary aspects of geography. A total of 109 publications by 57 researchers were reviewed. Altogether, 23 persons from the evaluated units (management, academic staff, and Ph.D. students) were interviewed in Oslo. The panel wishes to thank the individual researchers for participating in the evaluation and the representatives of the research units for stimulating discussions during the interview sessions. The panel also wishes to thank the Research Council of Norway for giving us this opportunity to a stimulating exploration and reflection on the status of our discipline. Dr. Jannecke Wiers-Jenssen, Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU), acted as a most efficient and knowledgeable secretary to the panel. January 2011 Mats Widgren, Chair of the panel Stockholm University Kirsten Simonsen Ari Lehtinen Roskilde University University of Eastern Finland Mats Lundmark Madelene Ostwald Örebro University Lindköping University 3 4 Table of contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Objectives and scope of the evaluation ................................................................ 11 1.2 Terms of reference and the evaluation tasks ......................................................... 12 1.2 Data sources and the tasks of the evaluation panel .............................................. 13 2 Overview of Norwegian geography research.......................................................... 16 2.1 Overview of the Norwegian geography research community and the delimitation of the evaluation............................................................................... 16 2.2 National collaboration .......................................................................................... 21 2.3 Personnel at the selected units.............................................................................. 22 2.4 Master’s candidates, researcher training and recruitment .................................... 27 2.5 Major funding sources.......................................................................................... 28 2.6 Overview of scholarly publications...................................................................... 33 2.7 Summary of background statistics ....................................................................... 36 3 Unit profiles................................................................................................................ 38 3.1 Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU): Department of Geography ............................................................................................................ 38 3.2 University of Bergen (UiB): Department of Geography...................................... 41 3.3 University of Oslo (UiO): Department of Sociology and Human Geography..... 44 3.4 Agder (University of Agder and Agder Research)............................................... 48 3.5 University of Tromsø (UiT): Department of Sociology, Political Science and Community Planning............................................................................................ 51 3.6 University of Life Sciences (UMB): Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric..................................................................... 55 3.7 Nord-Trøndelag University College (HiNT): Faculty of Agriculture and Information Technology....................................................................................... 57 3.8 Summary of main observations and overall structural issues .............................. 60 4 Scope and quality of research: Subfield profiles .................................................... 63 4.1 Subfield and major thematic areas in Norwegian geography............................... 63 4.2 Economic geography............................................................................................ 64 4.3 Social and cultural geography .............................................................................. 70 4.4 Political geography and development studies ...................................................... 75 4.5 Landscape geography........................................................................................... 79 4.6 Environment and livelihoods................................................................................ 82 4.7 Physical geography and climate........................................................................... 84 4.8 Summary of main observations: Subfields in an international perspective ......... 90 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 93 5 5.1 The evaluation – scope and limitations.................................................................93 5.2 Norwegian geography in perspective....................................................................93 5.3 Summary of main observations.............................................................................96 5.4 Recommendations.................................................................................................98 References ........................................................................................................................100 Appendix 1: Evaluation documents and evaluation panel ..........................................103 Appendix 2. Publications reviewed................................................................................119 Appendix 3 General Information about the Norwegian research system..................128 Appendix 4 Notes on data sources .................................................................................132 Appendix 5 Journals/series at Level 1 and Level 2 per 2010 ......................................134 Appendix 6 NIFU STEP report on Scholarly publications .........................................140 6 Executive Summary This evaluation of the research in geography in Norway has been carried out for the Research Council of Norway (RCN). The intention of the evaluation is to contribute to the further development of geography research in Norway. The evaluation is based on information from seven research environments conducting geographical research in Norway. Three of these are geographical departments at the oldest, traditional universities, three others are (related to) multidisciplinary units at new universities, and one is at a university college. A panel of five Nordic geographers has performed the evaluation. In accordance with the Terms of Reference, the evaluation is based on the following sources of information: self- evaluation reports prepared by the selected research units, publications submitted by senior personnel at the selected research units, CVs and publication lists from the selected researchers, interviews with representatives from the units evaluated and background reports from NIFU. In addition, the panel has used different internet resources such as the homepages of the institutions evaluated, the RCN and the Frida database. The evaluation gives a description of research activities of the evaluated research communities. The quality of research is mainly evaluated according to subfield. The research communities In their self-evaluations and in the interviews, the different units reveal different perspectives and experiences in building creative research environments, and in the cooperation between different fields, especially between physical and human geography. In all cases the boundaries between different research groups and clusters appear to be rather porous at all of the units. The evaluated units are all small enough to promote creative interaction between research groups. Where they differ, however, is in their ambition to create synergies. The geographers at NTNU have launched a common research programme to inspire cooperation across research groups as well as across the traditional divide between human and physical geography. Despite the lack of an explicit strategy for collaboration the human geographers in Oslo have, nevertheless, managed to renew research at the interface between different research clusters, especially in the field of environmental geography, a field which has benefited from the strong tradition of critical human geography in Oslo. In Bergen the signs of integration are less obvious and the department
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADRESSELISTE Myndigheter , Organisasjoner Og Andre Berørte Grunneiere
    Vedlegg til oppstartsmelding – forvaltningsplan for Røstøyan landskapsvernområde og Nykan naturreservat ADRESSELISTE Myndigheter , organisasjoner og andre berørte Fiskeridirektoratet [email protected] Fortidsminneforeningen i Nordland v/Trygve Breivik [email protected] Forum for natur- og friluftsliv Nordland [email protected] Kaikanten rorbuer [email protected] Kårøya Rorbucamping [email protected] Kystverket [email protected] NJFF Nordland [email protected] Nordland Bonde- og Småbrukarlag [email protected] Nordland bonde- og småbrukerlag [email protected] Nordland Bondelag [email protected] Nordland fylkeskommune [email protected] Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning [email protected] Norsk Ornitologiske Forening, Bodø [email protected] Norsk Ornitologiske Forening, Lofoten [email protected] Norsk Ornitologiske Forening, Nordland [email protected] NVE, Region Nord [email protected] Riksantikvaren [email protected] Røst Air [email protected] Røst Bryggehotell [email protected] Røst Havfiskecamping 8064 Røst Røst JFF [email protected] Røst kommune [email protected] Røst næringsforening v/ Tore Ivar Johansen [email protected] Sametinget [email protected] Grunneiere Allendes Borghild Helene Danefjell 13 4550 Farsund Andersen Bjarne Frank Bø 8289 Engeløya Andersen Monrad Albert Marikosveien 17 1715 Yven Andersen Svenn Thorbjørn Demma 19 B 8015 Bodø Andersen Tore Holst Lille Hunstad 8 8019 Bodø Andreassen Jens Albin Markveien 3 8064 Røst Andreassen Karstein Røstlandveien 60 8064 Røst Angelo Tine Vollveien 18 8011
    [Show full text]
  • The Nickel Mineralizationof the Rana Mafic Intrusion, Nordland, Norway
    • THE NICKEL MINERALIZATIONOF THE RANA MAFIC INTRUSION, NORDLAND, NORWAY. Rognvald Boyd and Carl 0. Mathiesen Norges geologiskeundersøkelse,Postboks 3006, 7001 Trondheim, Norway. NORGES GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØKELSE ABSTRACT The Råna synorogenicCaledonide intrusion in north Norway contains pentlandite+pyrrhotite+chalcopyrite+pyritedisseminationsgrading up tO 0.8% sulfide nickel in peridotite in the northwesternpart of the body. Peridotite and pyroxenite occur as bands and lenses within a peripheral zone mainly of norite, around a core mainly of quartz-norite.Crystal settling appears to have been an important process at Råna but over much of the intrusion primary structureshave been severely disturbed by the later Caledonian fold phases which also involved local overthrusting: these movements resulted in iniolding and thrustingof units of semipel- itic and calesilicate gneiss and black schist into the intrusion.The body has the form of an inverted, possibly truncated cone with its axiS plunging northwestwardsat a moderate angle. The peridotites show no obvioUs systematicvariation of sulfide or silicate mineralogy across strike. Locally, ass&iated with certain deformation zones, disseminationpasses into ma3sive mobilized sulfide ti with up to 5% nickel. The proximity of sulfide-bearingblack schists to mineralized rocks, the occurrence of graphite djsseminated in peridotite and other factors, suggest assimilationof sulfur from the Country rocks. Sulfur isotope studies do not, however, offer confirmationof the hypo- thesis that an external source ot sulfur nas had more than very local significanceat Råna. 1 NORGES GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØKELSE • INTRODUCTION The Råna mafic intrusion lies at approximately68°30'N, in steep mountainous terrain 20 km soutnwest of the iron-ore port of Narvik in north Norway (Fig.1).The present paper will give a brief description of the general geology of the complex, with a more detailed consider- ation of the sulfide-bearingareas - especially the main one at Bruvann (Fig.2) - and of the cenetic implicationsinvolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Mo Industrial Park
    W E L C O M E T O Mo Industripark MO INDUSTRIAL PARK Jan I. Gabor VP Marketing MIP SUSTAINABILITY – ONGOING INITIATIVES ENERGY CIRCULAR REDUCTION IN EFFICIENCY ECONOMY EMISSIONS A total of approx. 350.000 m2 of floorspace owned by The industrial centre point in the north Within the process industry, engineering and service Mo Industripark AS sector BOOSTING COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH CIRCULAR ECONOMY – CROSS SECTORAL APPROACH We are exploring CCU opportunities in our region and are looking into a range of possible business cases linked to captured CO2: ▪ Replace fossil fuels in combustion processes ▪ Producing hydrogen ▪ Producing methanol ▪ Produce proteins for fish feed, replacing soy CO2-HUB NORDLAND PROCESS INDUSTRY TOWARDS ZERO EMISSIONS ● Application to Climit Demo granted April 17th 2018 ● Design of capture plants on selected cases/locations ● Site-specific evaluation of capture technologies ● Specification of CCS cluster solutions for the region a "CO2-hub" for capture, conditioning and intermittent storage connected to national infrastructure for geological storage ● Site-specific evaluation of CCU options and pathways HYDROGEN HUB MO INTENTION AGREEMENT WITH STATKRAFT, CELSA AND MO INDUSTRIPARK ▪ Build green industry in Mo ▪ Green steel – 10 to 40 MW, later expansion ▪ Represents the first step in an industrial development of new greenindustries based on green hydrogen. ▪ Potential 200-300 MW electrolysis production ▪ Other industries like fish fodder and transport VALUE CHAIN HEAVY TRANSPORT INDUSTRIAL H 2 I N M O CELSA/MIT 2 MW TRANSPORT 20 MW TRUCKS/FERRIES Storage Produksjon REUSE OF IRON Infrastructure 40 MW H2 CELSA H2 Piping/Distribution CCU 150-200 MW APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 30 MW BIOCARBON Mo Industrial E-fuel AS HOW? Above 100 MILL EUR invested last decade – ready to roll out WHERE? In Nordland for Norway, the Nordics and the World, now Nordland hydropower conversion into H2 Nordland infrastructure local storage* and usage Nordland CO2 feedstock combined international shipment 1.2 Mio tons p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppdrag Til Fylkesmannen I Nordland – Tysfjord
    Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet Saksb.: Robert Isaksen Postboks 8112 Dep e-post: [email protected] Tlf: 75531612 0032 OSLO Vår ref: 2017/3977 Deres ref: 17/2556 Vår dato: 23.06.2017 Deres dato: 16.06.2017 Arkivkode: 732.1 Oppdrag til Fylkesmannen i Nordland – Tysfjord Det vises til brev av 16.juni 2017, hvor Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet ber Fylkesmannen i Nordland om å utarbeide et forslag til en plan for oppfølgingstiltak etter overgrepssakene i Tysfjord innen 23.juni 2017. I denne oversendelsen gjøres det rede for forslaget fra Fylkesmannen. Den korte tidsfristen har lagt begrensninger på Fylkesmannens mulighet til å involvere andre aktører i arbeidet. Fylkesmannen har mottatt et innspill fra Tysfjord Fellesliste. Innspillet ligger vedlagt dette brevet og kommer i tillegg til de forslag som Fylkesmannen har. Forslaget fra Fylkesmannen må betraktes som en foreløpig skisse til en plan for oppfølgingstiltak. I samarbeid med aktuelle fagmiljø og aktører vil det være behov for justeringer og utdyping av de enkelte punkter. Bakgrunn Tysfjord kommune har hatt utfordringer med avdekking av en rekke seksuelle overgrep. Disse har i stor grad foregått innenfor rammene av en taushetskultur med begrenset sjanse for å bli avslørt og straffeforfulgt. I juni 2016 skjedde imidlertid flere ting som utfordret denne taushetskulturen: 1. Reportasje i VG Helg lørdag den 11.juni 2016, der en rekke personer i Tysfjord fortalte om seksuelle overgrep, samt etterfølgende artikler i flere medier. 2. Enstemmig uttalelse fra Tysfjord kommune, jf. kommunestyremøte den 22.6.2016: «Tysfjord kommune vil beklage overfor ofrene som har opplevd overgrep. Tysfjord kommune erkjenner at dette er en utfordring for hele Tysfjord-samfunnet og vil ta avstand fra uttalelser som utpeker enkelte grupper og miljøer i kommunen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ski Touring in the Narvik Region
    SKI TOURING IN THE NARVIK REGION TOP 5 © Mattias Fredriksson © Mattias Narvik is a town of 14 000 people situated in Nordland county in northern Norway, close to the Lofoten islands. It is also a region that serves as an excellent base for alpine ski touring and off-piste skiing. Here, you are surrounded by fjords, islands, deep valleys, pristine lakes, waterfalls, glaciers and mountain plateaus. But, first and foremost, wild and rugged mountains in seemingly endless terrain. Imagine standing on one of those Arctic peaks admiring the view just before you cruise down on your skis to the fjord side. WHY SKI TOURING IN THE NARVIK REGION? • A great variety in mountain landscapes, from the fjords in coastal Norway to the high mountain plateaus in Swedish Lapland. • Close to 100 high quality ski touring peaks within a one- hour drive from Narvik city centre. • Large climate variations within short distances, which improves the chances of finding good snow and weather. • A ski touring season that stretches from the polar night with its northern lights, to the late spring with never- ending days under the midnight sun. • Ascents and descents up to 1700 metres in vertical distance. • Some of the best chute skiing in the world, including 1200-metre descents straight down to the fjord. • Possibilities to do train accessed ski touring. • A comprehensive system of huts that can be used for hut-to-hut ski touring or as base camps. • 5 alpine skiing resorts within a one-hour car drive or train ride • The most recognised heli-skiing enterprise in Scandinavia, offering access to over 200 summits.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vibrant City on the Edge of Nature 2019/2020 Welcome to Bodø & Salten
    BODØ & SALTEN A vibrant city on the edge of nature 2019/2020 Welcome to Bodø & Salten. Only 90 minutes by plane from Oslo, between the archipelago and south, to the Realm of Knut Hamsun in the north. From Norway’s the peaks of Børvasstidene, the coastal town of Bodø is a natural second biggest glacier in Meløy, your journey will take you north communications hub and the perfect base from which to explore via unique overnight accommodations, innumerable hiking trails the region. The town also has gourmet restaurants, a water and mountain peaks, caves, fantastic fishing spots, museums park, cafés and shopping centres, as well as numerous festivals, and cultural events, and urban life in one of the country’s including the Nordland Music Festival, with concerts in a beautiful quickest growing cities, Bodø. In the Realm of Hamsun in the outdoor setting. Hamsun Centre, you can learn all about Nobel Prize winner Knut Hamsun`s life and works, and on Tranøy, you can enjoy open-air This is a region where you can get close to natural phenomena. art installations against the panoramic backdrop of the Lofoten There is considerable contrast – from the sea to tall mountains, mountain range. from the midnight sun to the northern lights, from white sandy beaches to naked rock. The area is a scenic eldorado with wild On the following pages, we will present Bodø and surroundings countryside and a range of famous national parks. Here, you can as a destination like no other, and we are more than happy immerse yourself in magnificent natural surroundings without to discuss any questions, such as possible guest events and having to stand in line.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Supply Potentials in the Northern Counties of Finland, Norway and Sweden Towards Sustainable Nordic Electricity and Heating Sectors: a Review
    energies Review Energy Supply Potentials in the Northern Counties of Finland, Norway and Sweden towards Sustainable Nordic Electricity and Heating Sectors: A Review Robert Fischer * ID , Erik Elfgren and Andrea Toffolo Energy Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-97187 Luleå, Sweden; [email protected] (E.E.); [email protected] (A.T.) * Correspondence: robert.fi[email protected]; Tel.: +46-920-49-1454 Received: 28 February 2018; Accepted: 23 March 2018; Published: 26 March 2018 Abstract: The lands in the northernmost corner of Europe present contradictory aspects in their social and economic development. Urban settlements are relatively few and small-sized, but rich natural resources (minerals, forests, rivers) attract energy-intensive industries. Energy demand is increasing as a result of new investments in mining and industries, while reliable energy supply is threatened by the planned phase out of Swedish nuclear power, the growth of intermittent power supplies and the need to reduce fossil fuel consumption, especially in the Finnish and Norwegian energy sectors. Given these challenges, this paper investigates the potentials of so far unexploited energy resources in the northern counties of Finland, Norway and Sweden by comparing and critically analyzing data from statistic databases, governmental reports, official websites, research projects and academic publications. The criteria for the technical and economic definition of potentials are discussed separately for each resource. It is concluded that, despite the factors that reduce the theoretical potentials, significant sustainable techno-economic potentials exist for most of the resources, providing important insights about the possible strategies to contribute to a positive socio-economic development in the considered regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cave Paintings of Norway
    Terje Norsted The Cave Paintings of Norway Introduction The Norwegian cave paintings form a geographically confined phenomenon. They are concen- trated in the two neighbouring counties of Nord-Trøndelag and Nordland which are in the north- ern region of the country. At the time of writing, twelve sites con- taining about 170 painted figures have been documented. The Norwegian painted caves are remarkable in the sense that they are the only recorded ex- amples of their kind in northern Europe. Located in desolate areas along the Atlantic coast, they are found in mountainous landscapes with a rugged shoreline. The con- sensus of opinion is that the ma- jority of the paintings were made by hunter-gatherer-fishers during the Bronze Age (or the Early Metal Age as this period is referred to in northern Norway), and that they stayed in these caves on a short- term basis for ritual purposes only. The Norwegian painted caves: an overview The sites on the list below are numbered according to geography, starting from south (please see the map, fig.1). In addition to the site names, the list has entries for the district, county and borough as well as the year of discovery of the paintings. Ytre Namdalen, Nord-Trøndelag 1. Fingals Cave, Nærøy (1961) 2. Solsem Cave, Leka (1912) Fig. 1. Map showing the 12 cave painting sites in Norway the year 2013. Adoranten 2013 5 Sør-Helgeland, Nordland 3. Troillholet, Vevelstad (1988) caves. They have been eroded in different 4. Skåren-Monsen Cave, Brønnøy (1978) kinds of metamorphic rocks. Salten, Nordland 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Røst Reef - Reef Røst the Y En O Mliem Echosounding
    The Røst Reef - A Potential MPA Location The Røst Reef is located west of the Røst Island in the Lofoten Archipelago, Northern Norway. The reef is approximately 40 km long and 2-3 km wide (see map). It covers an area of approximately 100 km2 (10 times larger than the Sula Reef). The reef lies within Norway‘s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The reef is found within the following coordinates: A: 67°35,5’ N 9°31,1’ E B: 67°33,0’ N 9°38,2’ E C: 67°19,4’ N 9°02,7’ E D: 67°22,3’ N 8°55,4’ E Potential Reasons for Selection briefing The Røst Reef is the world‘s largest known cold water (Lophelia pertusa) reef. As such, WWF recognises the Røst Reef as a global natural heritage that merits Fig. 1: The location of the Røst Reef west of the Røst Island in the Lofoten Archipelago (Northern Norway) is indicated in protection through MPA status. Norwegian scientists red on the inserted map. estimate that between 30 and 50 % of all Lophelia reefs Biological Features in Norwegian waters are damaged or impacted as a So far, no ecological studies have been performed on the result of bottom-trawling. Video observations of the Røst Reef, but the reef is expected to play the same Røst Reef have shown particularly large and dense ecological role as other Lophelia pertusa reefs. Studies Lophelia colonies, and the reef appears to be performed by the Institute of Marine Research at largely intact. These factors all contribute to the Storegga, Norway, have shown a significantly higher importance of protecting the Røst Reef for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • VERNEPLAN for SJUNKHATTEN NASJONALPARK I BODØ, FAUSKE OG SØRFOLD KOMMUNER I NORDLAND FYLKE 1. FORSLAG 1.1 Hjemmelsgrunnlag
    Miljøverndepartementet KONGELIG RESOLUSJON Miljø- og utviklingsminister: Erik Solheim Ref.nr.: Saksnr: Dato: VERNEPLAN FOR SJUNKHATTEN NASJONALPARK I BODØ, FAUSKE OG SØRFOLD KOMMUNER I NORDLAND FYLKE 1. FORSLAG Miljøverndepartementet (MD) legger med dette fram forslag til verneplan for Sjunkhatten nasjonalpark i Bodø, Fauske og Sørfold kommuner i Nordland fylke. Den foreslåtte na- sjonalparken omfatter et areal på totalt ca 417,5 km2. Av dette er ca 39,8 km2 sjøareal. 34,7 % (inkludert sjøareal) er statlig grunn og 65,3 % er privat grunn. 1.1 Hjemmelsgrunnlag Den foreslåtte nasjonalparken utgjør et større, egenartet og vakkert naturområde, som i det vesentlige er fritt for tekniske inngrep og med stor variasjonsbredde av naturtyper og landskap. Nasjonalparken skal bidra til bevaringsmålene i § 33 bl.a. bokstavene a, c, d, e og g. På denne bakgrunn foreslås dette særegne nordnorske fjord- og fjellandskapet etab- lert som nasjonalpark i medhold av lov om forvaltning av naturens mangfold (naturmang- foldloven) §§ 34 og 77, jf §§ 35 og 62. Vern av den foreslåtte nasjonalparken vil bidra til å oppfylle nasjonale mål og internasjo- nale plikter i • St. meld. nr. 62 (1991-92) Ny landsplan for nasjonalparker og andre større verneom- råde i Norge, • St.prp. nr. 1 (2008-2009) for Miljøverndepartementet og • Verdens naturvernunion (IUCN) og Konvensjonen om biologisk mangfold (CBD), jf. naturmangfoldloven § 46, 1. ledd. Verneområdet skal bidra til å oppfylle nasjonale mål som bl.a. ”Eit representativt utval av norsk natur skal vernast for kommande generasjonar” og ”Halde oppe eller byggje opp att truga arter til livskraftige nivå”. Vernet sikrer urørt natur, tar vare på noen av de største villmarkspregede områdene som er igjen i Nordland (og i Norge) og sikrer flere svært viktige naturtyper og en rekke rødlistearter1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kunnskap for Et Bærekraftig Nordland Et Utdrag Av Kunnskapsgrunnlaget for Den Regionale Planstrategien 1 4 Arealbruk Og Arealressurser (Km²), 2011 Og 2020
    Kunnskap for et bærekraftig Nordland Et utdrag av kunnskapsgrunnlaget for den regionale planstrategien 1 4 Arealbruk og arealressurser (km²), 2011 og 2020. Brutto driftsutgifter til samferdsel per innbygger (kr). 2011 2020 15 000 Boligbebyggelse 74,65 74,38 Finnmark fylkeskommune Finnmárkku fylkagielda Fritidsbebyggelse 26,74 30,36 Kunnskap for et 12 000 Troms fylkeskommune Romsa fylkagielda Bebygd område for landbruk og fiske 29,67 28,45 Næring, offentlig og privat tjenesteyting 33,54 31,84 Nordland fylkeskommune 9 000 bærekraftig Nordland Undervisning og barnehage 3,41 3,03 Møre og Romsdal fylkeskommune Helse- og sosialinstitusjoner 1,40 1,40 6 000 Kultur og religiøse aktiviteter 2,02 1,89 Sogn og Fjordane fylkeskommuneKunnskapsgrunnlaget som er utarbeidet for den regionale planstrategien Transport, telekom. og teknisk infrastruktur 164,17 168,04 3 000 2020-2024 skal bidra til å skape et felles fundament for fylkets utfordringer Beredskapstjenester og Forsvaret 3,03 1,75 Grønne områder, idretts- og sportsområder 10,18 13,30 og muligheter. 0 Uklassifisert bebyggelse og anlegg 9,92 14,44 2015 2017 2019 Jordbruksareal 727,20 753,41 Sogn og Fjordane fylkeskommune Møre og Romsdal fylkeskommune ette dokumentet er en kortutgave av kunnskaps- Et viktig element i regional utvikling er å avdekke og vide- Skog 10789,84 10813,98 Nordland fylkeskommune Troms fylkeskommune Romsa fylkagielda grunnlaget, og fører videre inndelingen etter FNs reutvikle områder som gjerne er stedsavhengig og som gir Åpen fastmark 17035,00 16762,47 Finnmark fylkeskommune Finnmárkku fylkagielda bærekraftsmål. Utviklingstrender i fylket knyttes opp regionale fortrinn. EU og OECD anbefaler den strategiske Våtmark 1392,56 1439,80 Dmot fylkeskommunens rolle som samfunnsutvikler.
    [Show full text]
  • MESTO DEJINY Narvik, a Swedish Norwegian Border Town
    MESTO a DEJINY Narvik, a Swedish Norwegian Border Town Steinar Aas vol. 8, 2019, 1, pp. 54-79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33542/MAD2019-1-03 This article gives an insight into the industrialization and colonization processes of northern Scandinavia. Urbanization due to industrialization is a vital part of the perspective, and brings us into an industrial mega system in Swedish Lapland in the late nineteenth century based on iron ore export. It was to be connected to the industrial centre of Europe, especially the Ruhrgebiet of Germany, and paved the way for a new kind of urban development in peripheral Europe – the industrial network town. The history and foundation of the Norwegian harbour town Narvik is vital for gaining insight into this mega system. By studying Narvik we can envisage particularities of, and similarities and diff erences between Norway and Sweden when it comes to their urban economic foundations, urban development/planning regimes, and the relations between the municipalities, the modern nation states and the dominating companies. Even the development of a uniquely Scandinavian identity connected with the labour movement and the development of a post-war social democrat order visibly results from the new industries. Thus the common Swedish-Norwegian fi gure of the rallar – something like navvy or construction worker – has a signifi cant place in this study, and the use of the fi gure in addition to later processes of memory creation, both within the Norwegian and Swedish labour movements, is addressed. Keywords: Urban History. Modernization. Industrialization. Norwegian History. Swedish History. Technology. Urban Planning. Memory Studies.
    [Show full text]