DOCSLIB.ORG

THE REAL PRESENCE by Tom Elich I Am in the Train on My Way Home

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE REAL PRESENCE by Tom Elich I Am in the Train on My Way Home THE REAL PRESENCE by Tom Elich I am in the train on my way home from the hospital. I have just said a last goodbye to my dear grandma who is dying. My eyes and heart are filled with tears, my mind with memories going back to childhood. My shoulder presses against the large person sitting beside me. There is conversation around me but I do not notice. When I get off and walk home, I cannot say if I was sitting beside a man or woman or anyone. Who has been really present to me during my journey? Real presence is ambiguous. Yet in faith we hold firmly to the real presence of Christ in the liturgy: Christ who is with us in the assembly of the Church, Christ who speaks to us in the words of Scripture, Christ who leads us in the person of the priest, Christ whom we receive as bread and wine from the table of the Eucharist. How do we understand real presence? What does it mean when Jesus holds bread and says, ‘This is my body’; then gives the cup and says, ‘This is the cup of my blood’? Historical Tension Let us pay a visit to the monastery of Corbie in the ninth century. Two of the monks, contemporaries, had very different approaches. Paschasius Radbertus had a literalist understanding. For him, the eucharistic body of Christ was virtually the same as the historical body, born of the Virgin Mary, only it was veiled by the bread and wine which were like a mask or an envelope to conceal the natural body of Christ. He supported his position with crude stories of bleeding hosts or the vision of the infant Jesus sacrificed on the altar. God is kind to us. Because we cannot bear to eat raw human flesh, God transforms the body of Christ into bread and wine for communion. His confrère, Ratramnus, also affirmed the real presence of Christ but offered a different understanding. He advocated a sacramental reality, not a literal one. The elements of bread and wine do not contain or veil the natural flesh and blood of Christ. Externally, the Eucharist retains the form, the smell and taste of bread and wine; internally, there is something far more precious: a divine reality perceived by the mind of faith, received and eaten by the faithful. The Eucharist is spiritual food, not carnal sustenance. Citing Augustine, the sacrament for Ratramnus points both to the body of the risen Christ and also to the ecclesial body, the Church. Paschasius was very wary of the distinction between ‘image’ and ‘truth’ because he thought it might compromise the reality of Christ’s presence; Ratramnus on the other hand affirmed it as essential to a proper understanding of the mystery of the Eucharist – it is the sacrament of the true flesh of Christ. In the eleventh century, teacher Berengarius of Tours was charged with heresy and made to confess that the bread and wine which are placed on the altar are not merely a sacrament after consecration, but are rather the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, and that these are truly, physically and not merely sacramentally touched and broken by the hands of the priests and crushed by the teeth of the faithful. Clearly he was teaching a sacramentalist position but was forced to adopt this ultra-literalist one. Ultimately the sacramentalist view wins the day in terms of official theology, but the literalist view has been remarkably persistent in the popular imagination until the present day. Two examples will suffice. In the eighteenth century, Mozart composed an exquisite setting of a fourteenth century text Ave Verum Corpus which we still love to listen to. It was written as a salutation of the blessed sacrament at its elevation; it displays a clearly literalist understanding of real presence. Hail, true body, born of the Virgin Mary, having truly suffered, sacrificed on the cross… In 2020, a young Italian, Carlo Acutis, was beatified. He died of leukaemia in 2006 at the age of fifteen after spending his final months documenting and cataloguing eucharistic miracles for his website. There are hundreds of them from every part of the world since the Middle Ages, mostly referring to the host which appears as human flesh. Transubstantiation The official Catholic position affirmed at the time of the Reformation is enshrined in the doctrine of transubstantiation. Contrary to popular belief, this is actually a firmly sacramental presentation of the Eucharist. The word was first used officially at the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 and then elaborated by Thomas Aquinas during the thirteenth century. It means that the accidents of bread and wine remain unchanged, but the substance of bread and wine are changed by the words of Christ into the substance of his body and blood. The problem for us is that we no longer understand reality in this way. ‘Substance’ has nothing to do with a scientific or forensic understanding of matter. It is a metaphysical reality. Take a book, for example. It is made of paper, plastic, ink, glue and so on. But all this, including its colour, smell, weight and size belong to its ‘accidents’. Absolutely everything that can be accessed, even by the most sophisticated science, belongs to its ‘accidents’. Taking them altogether, this thing is a book. It is an object that shares bookness with millions of other objects on library shelves. This bookness is its ‘substance’. So when we talk about transubstantiation, what we are saying is that nothing changes about the bread and wine at their consecration except ‘what-it-is’. It is no longer bread and wine; it is the body and blood of Christ. We can only know this by faith. This is not really the explanation of the Eucharist that some people imagine it to be. It is unique and utterly mysterious that the accidents of bread and wine can be detached from their substance and instead adhere to a different substance. The accidents of the body and blood of Christ have no connection whatever to the Eucharist. This makes the eucharistic miracles of bleeding hosts or the appearance of Christ highly problematic. These are the work of the mystical imagination but are not part of the real presence of Christ in the sacrament of the Eucharist. Nor in fact can we imagine that Christ is in the host, or in the ciborium, or in the tabernacle. ‘Locality’ belongs to the accidents of an object, not its substance. Thus the substance of bookness is not trapped inside any particular book; it is meta-physical, that is, it transcends the physical object. The risen Christ, present in word and sacrament, in the assembly of the baptised and its leader, is not contained by any of them. When we pray at the tabernacle or before the monstrance, we behold the sacrament which takes us through to a different reality. A Sacramental Reality Sometimes people are dismissive of a sacramental, non-literalist understanding of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. There may be a fear that the ‘real’ is being downplayed in favour of something which is merely ‘symbolic’. But this is to misunderstand the structure of the sacramental reality. For Aquinas, a sacrament has three inter-related dimensions, none of which can be disregarded: Sacramentum – the sacrament itself, which is the bread and wine. Res – the ultimate reality or purpose, which is our unity as the Mystical Body of Christ. Sacramentum et res – the intermediate or bridging sacramental reality, which is the Body and Blood of Christ. Thus the sacramental sign of the bread and wine is not irrelevant; rather it is the means by which we participate in Christ who is present sacramentally, the way to union with God. The ‘signifying’ and the ‘reality’ are two sides of the one coin. This is what we mean when we speak of the sacraments as efficacious instruments of God’s grace. So the liturgy encourages us to make the signs well – to have real bread that we can break into many parts, to receive communion from the cup – so that our sacrament not only effects what it signifies, but also signifies what it effects. When the sacramental sign breaks down – when the bread and wine are no longer something edible and potable – the consecrated elements are no longer the body and blood of Christ. Acceptance of the sacramental nature of Christ’s real presence liberates us from scruples. Dust from the consecrated bread which adheres to the ciborium, a stain on the purifier from the consecrated wine are not really bread and wine. They are not for eating or drinking. (Remember, the notion of ‘substance’ is metaphysical, not forensic.) If the sacramentum is not there, nor is the sacramentum et res. We are also liberated from the duty of trying to police who is entitled to receive holy communion. One of the neat questions which medieval theologians asked is, Quid mus summit? If a mouse were to nibble at the consecrated bread, what would the mouse be eating? Their answers were many and varied. But we would say that animals and infidels who approach the sacrament can only engage at the level of the sacramentum. It requires faith to seek union with God (res) and to participate in the blessed sacrament of the body and blood of the Lord. It requires faith to take and eat, take and drink as a memorial of the Risen Lord. It is only by faith that the sacrament can be fruitful. The focus on the sacramental reality helps us to move beyond narrow concerns with validity and to embrace questions of fruitfulness.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE EUCHARIST in EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE Celia
    THE EUCHARIST IN EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE Celia Chazelle In 843 or 844, Pascasius Radbertus, a monk of the Carolingian royal monastery of Corbie and its abbot from 843 to c. 847, presented King Charles the Bald (d. 877) with a special gift: a treatise about the Eucha- rist that Pascasius had written for Corbie’s mission house of Corvey between 831 and 833.1 Located in the eastern Carolingian territory of Saxony, Corvey had been founded from Corbie in 822 to help cement Christianity, and with it Carolingian rule, among the Saxons whom Charlemagne (d. 814) had forcibly converted from paganism around the turn of the ninth century. Pascasius must have recognized the significance of his gift’s timing, made either at Christmas (843) or at Easter (844).2 One of the key precepts expounded in this work, the first Latin treatise specifically on the Eucharist, is that through the Mass, bread and wine are inwardly, mystically changed into the historical flesh and blood of Christ. The sacrament that the king received in the feast honoring the incarnation (Christmas) or resurrection (Easter) was holy food and drink, the source of eternal salvation, because it contained the very body born of Mary in Bethlehem and crucified in Jerusalem. Pascasius wrote De corpore et sanguine Domini (“On the Lord’s Body and Blood”) in the midst of the rebellion of the three older sons of Emperor Louis the Pious (d. 840). By 843, the civil strife this unleashed had torn the Carolingian Empire apart;3 when Louis’ youngest son, 1 I am very grateful to numerous friends and colleagues for generously sharing their knowledge and offering advice on earlier drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period
    Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period This volume is an investigation of how Augustine was received in the Carolingian period, and the elements of his thought which had an impact on Carolingian ideas of ‘state’, rulership and ethics. It focuses on Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims, authors and political advisers to Charlemagne and to Charles the Bald, respectively. It examines how they used Augustinian political thought and ethics, as manifested in the De civitate Dei, to give more weight to their advice. A comparative approach sheds light on the differences between Charlemagne’s reign and that of his grandson. It scrutinizes Alcuin’s and Hincmar’s discussions of empire, rulership and the moral conduct of political agents during which both drew on the De civitate Dei, although each came away with a different understanding. By means of a philological–historical approach, the book offers a deeper reading and treats the Latin texts as political discourses defined by content and language. Sophia Moesch is currently an SNSF-funded postdoctoral fellow at the University of Oxford, working on a project entitled ‘Developing Principles of Good Govern- ance: Latin and Greek Political Advice during the Carolingian and Macedonian Reforms’. She completed her PhD in History at King’s College London. Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period Political Discourse in Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims Sophia Moesch First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Christi C: the Eucharist How and Why Fr. Frank Schuster Every
    Corpus Christi C: The Eucharist How and Why Fr. Frank Schuster Every so often, on feast days such as Corpus Christi, it is helpful to articulate what the Church means by holding that Jesus Christ our Lord is present in the Eucharist; body, blood, soul, and divinity. That we hold that Jesus is truly present in the Eucharist should come to no surprise because of the number of instances in the New Testament that Jesus says this is so. The last supper as remembered by Mathew, Mark, Luke and First Corinthians quote Jesus when referring to the bread and wine as his body and his blood. Jesus, in John chapter 6, in his bread of life discourse, gives very explicit language regarding how to understand the Eucharist, commanding us to eat his flesh and drink his blood. There are early church writings after the texts in the Bible, such as the Didiche and the Apologies of St. Justin Martyr that speak to the Early Church’s belief in the real presence of Christ. In fact, there are records of tabernacles being established early on for the purpose of reverently housing the Eucharist after Mass for the purpose of bringing the sacrament to the infirm. The belief in the real presence of Christ was simply an accepted tenant of faith for a number of centuries until a controversy erupted in the 9th century. Holy Roman Emperor Charles the Bald had an inquisitive mind and was curious as to whether or not the Eucharist we consume at Mass was also the historical body of the Lord born of the Virgin.
    [Show full text]
  • SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY and ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY Dmusjankiewicz Fulton College Tailevu, Fiji
    Andn1y.r Uniwr~itySeminary Stndics, Vol. 42, No. 2,361-382. Copyright 8 2004 Andrews University Press. SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY AND ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY DmusJANKIEWICZ Fulton College Tailevu, Fiji Sacramental theology developed as a corollary to Christian soteriology. While Christianity promises salvation to all who accept it, different theories have developed as to how salvation is obtained or transmitted. Understandmg the problem of the sacraments as the means of salvation, therefore, is a crucial soteriological issue of considerable relevance to contemporary Christians. Furthermore, sacramental theology exerts considerable influence upon ecclesiology, particularb ecclesiasticalauthority. The purpose of this paper is to present the historical development of sacramental theology, lea- to the contemporary understanding of the sacraments within various Christian confessions; and to discuss the relationship between the sacraments and ecclesiastical authority, with special reference to the Roman Catholic Church and the churches of the Reformation. The Development of Rom Catholic Sacramental Tbeohgy The Early Church The orign of modem Roman Catholic sacramental theology developed in the earliest history of the Christian church. While the NT does not utilize the term "~acrament,~'some scholars speculate that the postapostolic church felt it necessary to bring Christianity into line with other rebons of the he,which utilized various "mysterious rites." The Greek equivalent for the term "sacrament," mu~tmbn,reinforces this view. In addition to the Lord's Supper and baptism, which had always carried special importance, the early church recognized many rites as 'holy ordinances."' It was not until the Middle Ages that the number of sacraments was officially defked.2 The term "sacrament," a translation of the Latin sacramenturn ("oath," 'G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Trained Theologian
    THE WELL-TRAINED THEOLOGIAN essential texts for retrieving classical Christian theology part 1, patristic and medieval Matthew Barrett Credo 2020 Over the last several decades, evangelicalism’s lack of roots has become conspicuous. Many years ago, I experienced this firsthand as a university student and eventually as a seminary student. Books from the past were segregated to classes in church history, while classes on hermeneutics and biblical exegesis carried on as if no one had exegeted scripture prior to the Enlightenment. Sometimes systematics suffered from the same literary amnesia. When I first entered the PhD system, eager to continue my theological quest, I was given a long list of books to read just like every other student. Looking back, I now see what I could not see at the time: out of eight pages of bibliography, you could count on one hand the books that predated the modern era. I have taught at Christian colleges and seminaries on both sides of the Atlantic for a decade now and I can say, in all honesty, not much has changed. As students begin courses and prepare for seminars, as pastors are trained for the pulpit, they are not required to engage the wisdom of the ancient past firsthand or what many have labelled classical Christianity. Such chronological snobbery, as C. S. Lewis called it, is pervasive. The consequences of such a lopsided diet are now starting to unveil themselves. Recent controversy over the Trinity, for example, has manifested our ignorance of doctrines like eternal generation, a doctrine not only basic to biblical interpretation and Christian orthodoxy for almost two centuries, but a doctrine fundamental to the church’s Christian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RELATIONSHIP of THEOLOGY and PRAXIS the Issue of Transubstantiation in the Middle Ages
    QL 95 (2014) 183-193 doi: 10.2143/QL.95.3.3075943 © 2014, all rights reserved THE RELATIONSHIP OF THEOLOGY AND PRAXIS The Issue of Transubstantiation in the Middle Ages “How can bread be His body? And the cup, or what the cup contains, how can it be his blood? And the reason these things, brothers and sisters, can be called sacraments is that in them one thing is seen and another is to be understood.”1 While Augustine wrote these words in the early fifth century, they were cited by Ratramnus in 843 in his theological response to Emperor Charles the Bald who had posed two distinct questions to the Benedictine monk: do the faithful receive the body and blood of Christ ‘in a mystery’ or ‘in very truth’, and is this the same body and blood to which Mary gave birth?2 While not intended as such, it is these two pointed questions that prompted the theological development and evolution of the Eucharistic doctrine, resulting in The Council of Trent’s decree on the sacrificial and sacramental nature of the Eucharist some seven centuries later. The Council stated once and for all that Christ is “really, truly, substantially contained”3 in the consecrated forms. And indeed it is the distinction between seeing and understanding which not only led to theological conflict and controversy throughout the Middle Ages, but influenced the foundation of arguably the most important doctrine in the history of the Christian Church: the doctrine of transubstantiation,4 or transsubstantiatio. 1. Augustine, “Sermon 272,” The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, tr.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ: Ancient and Medieval Legacies
    I. The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ: Ancient and Medieval Legacies Reinhard Ulrich, editor Part I. Consolidating the Christian Witness (United), 7 Prophets and Apostles 1.1.1 The Didache, (c. 100), 25 1.1.2 Clement's First Letter, (c - 95), CLEMENT, 25 1.1.3 The Faith in Scripture and Tradition from Against Heresies, (c. 189), IRENAEUS, 32 1.1.4 The Rule of Faith and the Uses of Scripture from Prescription, (c. 189), TERTULLIAN, 41 1.1 5 On the Right Way of Reading the Scriptures from On First Principles IV,(c. 230), ORIGEN, 48 1.1.6 New Testament Canon from 39th Easter Letter, (367), ATHANASIUS), 55 Persecution 1.1.7 Letter from the Churches of Lyon and Vienne (177) from The History of the Church, (4th century), EUSEBIUS, 58 1.1.8 The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitas, (203), 69 1.1.9 The Problem of the Lapsed from Letter 33, (c. 250), CYPRIAN, 81 Defenders of the Faith 1.1.10 Letter to Diognetus, (c. 150), 84 1.1.11 First Apology, (c. 155), JUSTIN MARTYR, 94 1.1.12 Plea Regarding the Christians, (c. 177), ATHENAGORAS, 109 Visions of Church Unity 1.1.13 Letter to the Philadelphians, (c. 113), IGNATIUS OF ANTIOCH, 123 1.1.14 Outside the Church, There Is No Salvation from Letter 73, (c. 256), CYPRIAN, 129 1.1.15 The Church as the Body of Christ from Commentary on John XI, 1I (On John 17:20-21), CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA, (c. 430), 135 1.1.16 The Church as the Company of the Elect from On Baptism V, (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Christ's Real Presence in the Eucharist
    FAITH FACTS THE ANSWERS YOU NEED ON: HIS S Y ODY T I M B : CHRIST’S REAL PRESENCE IN THE EUCHARIST A SERVICE OF CATHOLICS UNITED FOR THE FAITH ISSUE . As Jesus Himself said, Does the Catholic Church teach that we actually I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna eat the body of Christ and drink His blood when we in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread receive Holy Communion? which comes down from heaven, that a man may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread which came RESPONSE . down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for Yes. The Catholic Church has always taught that the life of the world is my flesh (Jn. 6:48-51). in the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity, There are those today who accept the authority of our Lord Jesus—the whole Christ—is truly, really, of the Bible but question whether Jesus was and substantially present. This teaching is rooted in speaking literally in the Eucharistic passages, Scripture, taught by the Fathers and doctors of the especially John 6. The Greek text itself evidences the Church, and reaffirmed by popes and ecumenical Church’s constant understanding. In John 6:49, Jesus councils throughout Church history. This teaching is begins His teaching by first referring to eating summarized in the Catechism of the Catholic Church manna.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collections of Patristic Extracts That Are Frequently Found in Medieval
    The Constitution and Functions of Collections of Patristic Extracts: The example of the Eucharistie Controversy (9th-11th centuries) Stephane Gioanni The collections of patristic extracts that are frequently found in medieval manuscripts1 are one of the main modes of transmission of the Church Fathers2 in the Middle Ages: these collections ( called in tables of con­ tents florilegia, flores, analecta, col/ecta, compendia, dicta, sententiae and also miscellanea ...) deliberately bring tagether texts which are chrono­ logically, geographically, and generically diverse.3 But they are not sim­ ple receptacles: their organisation brought about connections, recon­ figurations and rewritings that had a decisive influence on the trans­ mission, perception and reception of the documents contained within them. Grouping them into collections responded to the desires of readers in a position to develop or modify them. These carefully composed miscel/anea came also to have a particular importance for the transmission of ancient texts because, on one hand, they demonstrated the auetoritos attributed to certain authors and, on the other hand, they I arn very gratefui to rnycolleague Robert jones for the insightful Supervision of this paper. Richard H. Rouse and Maty A. Rouse, "Fiorilegia of Patristic Texts," in Les Genres Iittemires dans /es sources theologiques et philosophiques medievales. Definition, critique et exp loitation. Actes du Col/oque international de Louvain-la-Neuve, 25- 27 mai 1981 (Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut des etudes rnedil�vales, 1982), 165-80. The term "Church Fathers" was used for influentialwriters and eminent teachers of the Church, especially after the Lateran Council of 649. This expression was not unknown in late Antiquity but it indicates rnostly, inthe 5'"-6'h centuries, the "318 fathers" of the Council of Nicaea of 325 and, rnore widely, participants in the EcurnenicalCouncils.
    [Show full text]
  • Gottschalk of Orbais' Teachings on Predestination
    ROCZNIKI FILOZOFICZNE Tom LXV, numer 3 – 2017 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf.2017.65.3-3 ANDRZEJ P. STEFAŃCZYK * DOCTRINAL CONTROVERSIES OF THE CAROLINGIAN RENAISSANCE: GOTTSCHALK OF ORBAIS’ TEACHINGS ON PREDESTINATION* This paper is intended to outline the main areas of controversy in the dispute over predestination in the 9th century, which shook up or electrified the whole world of contemporary Western Christianity and was the most se- rious doctrinal crisis since Christian antiquity. In the first part I will sketch out the consequences of the writings of St. Augustine and the revival of sci- entific life and theological and philosophical reflection, which resulted in the emergence of new solutions and aporias in Christian doctrine—the dispute over the Eucharist and the controversy about trina deitas. In the second part, which constitutes the main body of the article, I will focus on the presenta- tion of four sources of controversies in the dispute over predestination, whose inventor and proponent was Gottschalk of Orbais, namely: (i) the concept of God, (ii) the meaning of grace, nature and free will, (iii) the rela- tion of foreknowledge to predestination, and (iv) the doctrine of redemption, i.e., in particular, the relation of justice to mercy. The article is mainly an attempt at an interpretation of the texts of the epoch, mainly by Gottschalk of Orbais1 and his adversary, Hincmar of Reims.2 I will point out the dif- Dr ANDRZEJ P. STEFAŃCZYK — Katedra Historii Filozofii Starożytnej i Średniowiecznej, Wy- dział Filozofii Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II; adres do korespondencji: Al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabethan Protestant Press: a Study of the Printing and Publishing of Protestant Literature in English
    THE ELIZABETHAN PROTESTANT PRESS: A STUDY OF THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING OF PROTESTANT RELIGIOUS LITERATURE IN ENGLISH, EXCLUDING BIBLES AND LITURGIES, 1558-1603. By WILLIAN CALDERWOOD, M.A., B.D. Submitted for the Ph.D. degree, University College. (c\ (LONBI 2 ABSTRACT Uninterrupted for forty-five years, from 1558 to 1603, Protestants in England were able to use the printing press to disseminate Protestant ideology. It was a period long enough for Protestantism to root itself deeply in the life of the nation and to accumulate its own distinctive literature. English Protestantism, like an inf ant vulnerable to the whim of a parent under King Henry VIII, like a headstrong and erratic child in Edward's reign, and like a sulking, chastised youth in the Marian years, had come of age by the end of the Elizabethan period. At the outset of Elizabeth's reign the most pressing religious need was a clear, well-reasoned defence of the Church of England. The publication of Bishop Jewel's Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae in 1562 was a response to that need and set the tone of literary polemics for the rest of the period. It was a time of muscle- flexing for the Elizabethan Church, and especially in the opening decades, a time when anti-Catholicism was particularly vehement. Consistently throughout the period, when Queen and country were threatened by Catholic intrigues and conspiracies, literature of exceptional virulence was published against Catholicism. But just as the press became an effective tool for defenders and apologists of the Church of England, it soon was being used as an instrument to advance the cause of further reform by more radical Protestants.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT SORT of NACHFOLGER of ZWINGLI WAS BULLINGER? Joe
    WTJ 82 (2020): 301–17 WHAT SORT OF NACHFOLGER OF ZWINGLI WAS BULLINGER? Joe Mock The secondary literature on Zurich theology often takes as its starting point the dependence of Heinrich Bullinger on the thought of Huldrych Zwingli. This is because Bullinger is regarded as Zwingli’s successor or Nachfolger, who closely followed and echoed Zwingli’s teaching. Further- more, “Zwinglianism” is often imprecisely equated with Zurich theology. This article examines those sections of Bullinger’s commentary on 1 Corinthians (1534) that discuss the Lord’s Supper. Bullinger does cite Zwingli’s Concerning the Protests of Eck (1530) and An Exposition of the Faith (1531) but none of the other works of Zwingli on the Lord’s Supper. Of particular note is Bullinger’s use of Ratramnus’s treatise on the Lord’s Supper (early 840s), which had influenced Berengar of Tours (c. 999– 1088). Although Zwingli did refer to the importance of 1 Cor 10:1–5 for understanding the Lord’s Supper it was Bullinger who, using Ratramnus’s treatise, made a more comprehensive study of this pericope to underscore feeding on Christ spiritually by the elect in the Lord’s Supper. Both Bullinger and Zwingli were trained in humanism, rhetoric, and the use of the biblical languages. Since both placed the utmost priority on correctly interpreting Scripture through judicial use of the tools they were trained and skilled in, it is not surprising that, unfettered by the tradition of the medieval church, they came, independently, to similar views of the Lord’s Supper. There were, of course, nuanced differences between their respective understandings of the Lord’s Supper.
    [Show full text]