land Article What Role(s) Do Village Committees Play in the Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads? Evidence from Sichuan Province in Western China Peng Tang 1,2,3, Jing Chen 1, Jinlong Gao 4,5,* , Min Li 1 and Jinshuo Wang 3 1 Department of Land Resource and Real Estate Management, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
[email protected] (P.T.);
[email protected] (J.C.);
[email protected] (M.L.) 2 Center for Social Development and Social Risk Control of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China 3 Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Radboud University, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
[email protected] 4 Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China 5 Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA * Correspondence:
[email protected] Received: 25 October 2020; Accepted: 25 November 2020; Published: 27 November 2020 Abstract: Village committees, as grassroots spontaneously formed by rural collective members in China’s hierarchy system, play an irreplaceable role in the management of rural public affairs. Based on the filed survey dataset taken from three pilot counties/districts in Sichuan province, we explored the significant role that village committees played in farmers’ withdrawal from rural homesteads (WRH). Our empirical results, according to binary logistic regression (BLR) modelling, indicated that the WRH was significantly affected by the triple roles of village committees, among which information intermediary was the most effective followed by the trust builder and then the coordinated manager. Firstly, village committees’ involvement facilitated the WRH by improving policy transparency and decreasing information cost.