FIGU Bulletin No. 10

FIGU-BULLETIN Nr. 10 Volume 3 German printing: February 1997 English publishing: July 1998 The responsibility for all forms of publication (e.g. Internet, print etc.) of the FIGU Bulletin lies entirely on "Billy" Eduard A. Meier. Falsified UFO photographs by Herbert Runkel, Bernd Johann, and Thomas Klingler Photo 1) Forged UFO photograph with a purported Andromeda spaceship/energy craft. In the foreground, on the hood of the car, are Herbert Runkel (right) and Thomas Klingler (left). Photo 2) Forged UFO photograph with a purported Andromeda spaceship/energy craft. Leaning against the car is Bernd Johann. With these truthful explanations and statements, I trust that all written, telephone and personal inquiries regarding this matter have been addressed so I can finally close this subject. However, in the event that actions by my ex-wife, Herbert Runkel, Bernd Johann, and Thomas Klingler, require further clarification and evidence, particularly in regard to "P." and Herbert Runkel, I will do so, of course, in order to keep interested parties informed of other pertinent and rather ugly background details. Billy As many people are aware, the schemer Kal K. Korff, is also busily assembling his defamations against me; indeed, even on the Internet the waves are rising, and some busy hands and minds are at work at American UFO Magazine as well. And yet, some contributors to the magazine do not walk hand-in-hand with Korff, as demonstrated in UFO Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1996: MEIERS´S KINGDOM VS. KORFF Editor: I do not fully agree with George Earley's glowing review of Kal Korff's book Spaceships of the Pleiades: The Billy Meier Story (Vol. 11, No. 2). From my point of view, this book is far from "meticulous" and "highly readable." I do not have a vested financial interest in Meier's claims nor have I ever taken Meier's tall tales seriously. What I do have, though, is a little more knowledge about Meier than the average UFO Magazine reader. I became interested in Meier in the early 1980s and bought the two photo journals (first editions) and the videotape of Meier's films. I also bought Korff's original 1981 mimeographed pamphlet "THE MEIER INCIDENT--THE MOST INFAMOUS HOAX IN UFOLOGY!", which was delivered to my hands by his "editorial assistant," William Moore. I cannot list here all the inconsistencies I found (at least 50) in Korff's latest attempt, but here are a couple of the most aggravating ones: (1) On page 330 Korff adamantly sustains his erroneous assumption that Meier's 35mm camera is a single lens reflex. Once and for all, Korff, it is a rangefinder; (2) On page 110 Korff says ". there are no original photographic negatives or source materials of any of Meier's UFO pictures in existence." So, how does Meier reproduce those that he sells and of which Korff bought a few? Korff's book is not worthy of Earley's review. However, to be fair, credit must be given to Korff for his endeavor, faulty as it is. I wish Korff had not brushed off Meier's movie film, for that should've been a major part of his book. As far as I'm concerned, Meier's movie film looks good enough to convince anyone that UFOs exist and a brush-off is not responsible reporting. Edward Lopez New York, NY QUESTIONS FROM OUR READERS Question 1. How are your telepathic contact conversations transmitted? Th. Hubaleck/Czech Republic Response: The method by which contact conversations are transmitted has remained the same from the very beginning, and this is how it works: As soon as these contact conversations actually begin to take place they always have been, and continue to be, directly transmitted through the consciousness of the Pleiadian/Plejaran contact person to some highly sensitive technological devices on board their beamship/spacecraft, where everything is stored. These on-board devices transform the conversations into symbolic images of a spiritual-telepathic nature whereupon they are immediately transmitted to a stationary control capsule high above the Earth's orbit, where they are stored. Therefore, not a single word nor the meaning of the conversation is lost. When I am ready to recall the contact conversation, I use a spirit-telepathic code word to activate the storage device within the control capsule some minutes, hours or often days or weeks later, whereupon the stored conversations are transmitted to me in spirit- telepathic symbols. These symbols are assimilated within my spirit's consciousness and are then conveyed to my material consciousness, where I transform the spirit-telepathic symbols into words and sentences with which I am familiar. While the wording and sentence structure may, inevitably, no longer be identical to the ones actually used during the conversation, they are, nonetheless, 100% guaranteed to represent the exact connotation, value, and the meaning of the words and sentences in the original conversation—although what I may jot down later is no longer precisely the same wording. Because I have to transform the symbolic images once again back into words and sentences, the illusion is created that practically everything I write down is stored in my own particular type of language and wording. Still, the final printed information represents the identical meaning of the spoken and transmitted words. This process may be compared to a translation from one language to another, whereby the translator's written and spoken style come through. Consequently, you can spot my own vernacular in sentences or similar forms of conversation reproductions. Sometimes, however, I am able to recite ad verbatim certain expressions and word creations I receive from my contact person as long as I can still remember them from our conversation. I can only access stored conversations from the control capsule once; from then onward the conversation becomes irretrievable for me because it is then stored elsewhere, in a place that is inaccessible to me. But the main thing is that all contact conversations remain in the storage device, which is available to me until I access it and jot down the entire text. The transmission rate coincides with my typing speed which, before my collapse in 1982, was 1200 characters per minute with one hand. In order for me to have typed at this speed, it was necessary for Quetzal to modify my typewriter to make it operate faster and more efficiently. Question 2. What do the Pleiadians, respectively Plejarans, and you think of genetic engineering? Eugen Huber, Switzerland Response: I am convinced that the Pleiadians'/Plejarans' opinion is correct when they say that the time is ripe for us terrestrials to fulfill requirements for our evolution, including the genetic factor. Genetic technology, i.e., gene engineering and manipulation, is an inevitable, unstoppable development process that exists among every highly evolved civilization throughout the entire universe. Hence, even terrestrial humans cannot avoid implementing genetic engineering and manipulation. It is not only wrong for incognizant or arrogant people and organizations, such as Greenpeace, to rebel against it; in so doing they actually thwart human development. While the genetic engineering progress cannot be stifled through irrational standoffs, they may, nonetheless, result in obstacles and relapses of its development. The mere fact that plants can be altered to the point where they become more prolific and resistant to diseases, should be reason enough to look favorably upon genetic engineering, for it can positively influence and remedy much of this planet's hunger, poverty, and misery. Of course, medical implications must also be taken into account, which are so critical for human survival, such as those involving transplants and medications, to mention but two. Furthermore, genetic engineers and other genetic scientists do not simply fall from the sky as masters of their own particular disciplines. They must study their field intensely in order to master this subject. The investigation of any new technology will inevitably precipitate mistakes, however; but from mistakes additional studies, research and a guarantee of further progress will ensue. Understandably, occasional harm may result from mistakes in the exploration and development of terrestrial genetic technology since it currently is still in its infancy. But possible failures should not be taken as a bad omen and a reason for distorting all of this research and for stomping it into the ground. Inevitably, development will result in errors and maybe even harm. And yet, researchers would be ill advised to give up on their projects. It is vital that the research now in progress continues and that steps be taken to alleviate as many mistakes as possible. However, this type of work cannot take place in a terror-filled environment as is exemplified, for instance, by Greenpeace activism. Genetic technology is a vital facet of our development, essential for our evolution, and cannot be circumvented in the long run, even by terrestrials. In other words, it is much more constructive for us to rationally support the appropriate genetic scientific experts than it is to boycott them. Anyone boycotting them impedes not only human evolution, but takes on the responsibility for a great deal of suffering, poverty, and misery that may befall humans, animals and all nature on Earth. To have a hostile attitude toward genetic technology is to commit an irresponsible and criminal transgression against terrestrial humankind and the entire planet, including its floral and faunal life forms. Question 3. a) In your Overpopulation brochure #3, page 9, you state a family of 5 requires 1 hectare [approx. 2.5 acres] of land to feed itself, maintain a garden, and allow for freedom of movement. But in the next sentence you say that 1 kilometer2 (km2) = [0.39 mile2] should be calculated for every 12-person group.

Load more