DOCSLIB.ORG

R Graphics Output

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R Graphics Output Lycosidae Pardosa xerophila Pardosa brevivulva Pardosa hedini Pardosa laura Pardosa bifasciata Pardosa sp. Pardosa amentata Pardosa paludicola Pardosa Pardosa lapponica Pardosa concinna Pardosa fuscula Pardosa bucklei Pardosa groenlandica Pardosa lowriei Pardosa albomaculata Pardosa sinistra Pardosa anomala Pardosa furcifera Pardosa labradorensis Pardosa podhorskii Pardosa modica Pardosa ourayensis Pardosa sodalis Pardosa glacialis Pardosa algens Pardosa metlakatla Pardosa wyuta Pardosa coloradensis Pardosa ontariensis Pardosa tesquorum Pardosa pseudolapponica Pardosa mulaiki Pardosa morosa Pardosa tatarica Pardosa nigriceps Pardosa weixica Pardosa xerampelina Pardosa astrigera Pardosa diuturna Pardosa digitaliformis Pardosa moesta Pardosa ferruginea Pardosa dorsuncata Pardosa rainieriana Pardosa mackenziana Pardosa dorsalis Pardosa nigra Pardosa giebeli Pardosa uintana Acantholycosa solituda Pardosa beringiana Acantholycosa lignaria Pardosa hyperborea Pardosa oreophila Pardosa luctinosa Pardosa torrentum Pardosa agrestis Pardosa palustris Pardosa blanda Pardosa albatula Pardosa mixta Pardosa monticola Pardosa californica Pardosa falcifera Pardosa italica Pardosa distincta Pardosa lugubris Pardosa saltans Pardosa alacris Pardosa cf. lugubris Pardosa koponeni Pardosa caucasica Pardosa sternalis Pardosa prolifica Pardosa vancouveri Pardosa altamontis Pardosa ramulosa Pardosa wagleri Pardosa saturatior Pardosa mercurialis Pardosa lapidicina Pardosa vadosa Pardosa saxatilis Pardosa pullata Pardosa fulvipes Pardosa riparia Pardosa prativaga Pardosa milvina Pardosa delicatula Pardosa littoralis Pardosa hortensis Pardosa utahensis Wadicosa fidelis Pardosa birmanica Wadicosa sp. FP−2015 Pardosa proxima Pardosa sumatrana Pardosa pusiola Pardosa caliraya Pardosa chapini Pardosa nebulosa Pardosa sp. FP−2015 Pardosa jambaruensis Trochosa spinipalpis Trochosa terricola Trochosa ruricola Trochosa robusta Trochosa Trochosa aquatica Alopecosa barbipes Alopecosa kochi Alopecosa striatipes Alopecosa taeniopus Alopecosa fabrilis Alopecosa schmidti Alopecosa solitaria Alopecosa pentheri Alopecosa cursor Alopecosa Alopecosa aculeata Alopecosa taeniata Alopecosa trabalis Alopecosa cuneata Alopecosa pulverulenta Alopecosa accentuata Alopecosa hirtipes Alopecosa pictilis Alopecosa koponeni Alopecosa solivaga borea Alopecosa solivaga Alopecosa sibirica Alopecosa kulczynski Alopecosa sulzeri Alopecosa exasperans Alopecosa mutabilis Alopecosa albostriata Arctosa ebicha Alopecosa licenti Geolycosa vultuosa Tigrosa helluo Hogna jacquesbreli Hogna baltimoriana Hogna carolinensis Hogna timuqua Geolycosa missouriensis Hogna sp. 1GAB Hogna lenta Hogna ericeticola Hogna miami Hogna ammophila Hogna tigana Hogna osceola Hogna pseudoceratiola Hogna angusta Hogna albemarlensis Hogna galapagoensis Hogna hendrickxi Hogna snodgrassi Hogna junco Hogna espanola Hogna coloradensis Hogna kuyani Venator spenceri Tasmanicosa godeffroyi Hogna crispipes Venatrix Venatrix pseudospeciosa Geolycosa micanopy Geolycosa pikei Tigrosa annexa Rabidosa rabida Tigrosa aspersa Rabidosa carrana Tigrosa grandis Rabidosa punctulata Hogna Lycosa vachoni Lycosa baulnyi Lycosa fasciiventris Lycosa munieri Lycosa aff. suboculata Lycosa Lycosa oculata Lycosa aff. oculata Lycosa hispanica Lycosa tarantula Lycosa bedeli Geolycosa fatifera Geolycosa xera Geolycosa hubbelli Geolycosa ornatipes Geolycosa patellonigra Geolycosa escambiensis Geolycosa turricola Geolycosa rogersi Geolycosa rafaelana Geolycosa wrighti Geolycosa riograndae Lycosidae Lycosa bistriata Hogna radiata Trochosa abdita Trochosa sepulchralis Arctosa alluaudi Camptocosa parallela Camptocosa texana Schizocosa floridana Schizocosa crassipes Gladicosa gulosa Gladicosa bellamyi Schizocosa ocreata Schizocosa rovneri Schizocosa stridulans Schizocosa uetzi Schizocosa saltatrix Schizocosa crassipalpata Schizocosa bilineata Schizocosa duplex Schizocosa avida Schizocosa mccooki Schizocosa maxima Schizocosa sp. 4GAB Schizocosa retrorsa Schizocosa sp. 2GAB Schizocosa minnesotensis Schizocosa humilis Schizocosa sp. 3GAB Varacosa avara Varacosa shenandoa Lycosidae_gen 6 sp. NM−2005 Hogna frondicola Hogna suprenans Hippasa madraspatana Hippasa greenalliae Sosippus placidus Sosippus floridanus Sosippus sp. 1GAB Sosippus sp. 2GAB Pardosa timidula Sosippus sp. 3GAB Arctosa rubicunda Arctosa emertoni Arctosa alpigena Arctosa insignita Arctosa lama Arctosa maculata Arctosa leopardus Arctosa lutetiana Arctosa cinerea Arctosa perita Arctosa littoralis Arctosa virgo Allocosa absoluta Allocosa parva Allocosa noctuabunda Piratula Piratula cantralli Piratula insularis Piratula yaginumai Pirata montanus Pirata praedo Piratula uliginosa Piratula hygrophila Piratula latitans Piratula knorri Pirata bryantae Pirata piraticus Piratula canadensis Pirata piscatorius Piratula procurva Piratula minuta Pirata indigena Pirata sp. 1GAB Pirata alachuus Pirata sp. 4GAB Pirata sedentarius Pirata suwaneus Piratula tanakai Pirata subpiraticus Anoteropsis canescens Anoteropsis litoralis Anoteropsis montana Anoteropsis urquharti Anoteropsis forsteri Anoteropsis aerescens Anoteropsis blesti Anoteropsis westlandica Anoteropsis hallae Anoteropsis arenivaga Anoteropsis hilaris Anoteropsis senica Anoteropsis ralphi Anoteropsis flavescens Anoteropsis insularis Anoteropsis okatainae Anoteropsis cantuaria Anoteropsis lacustris Anoteropsis adumbrata Artoria separata Anoteropsis alpina Artoriopsis expolita Artoria flavimana Notocosa bellicosa Xerolycosa nemoralis Xerolycosa miniata Arctosa raptor Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata Alopecosa virgata Arctosa kwangreungensis Melocosa fumosa Trabeops aurantiacus Aulonia albimana Trebacosa marxi 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Araneae (Spiders), 2020
    2021 NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 34 Conservation status of New Zealand Araneae (spiders), 2020 Phil J. Sirvid, Cor J. Vink, Brian M. Fitzgerald, Mike D. Wakelin, Jeremy Rolfe and Pascale Michel Cover: A large sheetweb sider, Cambridgea foliata – Not Threatened. Photo: Jeremy Rolfe. New Zealand Threat Classification Series is a scientific monograph series presenting publications related to the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS). Most will be lists providing NZTCS status of members of a plant or animal group (e.g. algae, birds, spiders). There are currently 23 groups, each assessed once every 5 years. From time to time the manual that defines the categories, criteria and process for the NZTCS will be reviewed. Publications in this series are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications. The NZTCS database can be accessed at nztcs.org.nz. For all enquiries, email [email protected]. © Copyright August 2021, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 2324–1713 (web PDF) ISBN 978–1–99–115291–6 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by Te Rōpū Ratonga Auaha, Te Papa Atawhai/Creative Services, Department of Conservation; editing and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the Director, Terrestrial Ecosystems Unit, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand Published by Department of Conservation Te Papa Atawhai, PO Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of the Wolf Spider Genus Lycosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) in the Western Mediterranean Basin
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67 (2013) 414–428 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular systematics of the wolf spider genus Lycosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) in the Western Mediterranean Basin ⇑ Enric Planas a, Carmen Fernández-Montraveta b, Carles Ribera a, a Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Departament de Biologia Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain b Departamento de Psicología Biológica y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: In this study, we present the first molecular phylogeny of the wolf spider genus Lycosa Latreille, 1804 in Received 2 January 2013 the Western Mediterranean Basin. With a wide geographic sampling comprising 90 localities and includ- Revised 2 February 2013 ing more than 180 individuals, we conducted species delimitation analyses with a Maximum Likelihood Accepted 7 February 2013 approach that uses a mixed Yule-coalescent model to detect species boundaries. We estimated molecular Available online 15 February 2013 phylogenetic relationships employing Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference methods using mito- chondrial and nuclear sequences. We conducted divergence time analyses using a relaxed clock model Keywords: implemented in BEAST. Our results recovered 12 species that form four groups: Lycosa tarantula group Phylogeny comprising L. tarantula the type species of the genus, L. hispanica and L. bedeli; Lycosa oculata group com- Species delimitation Taxonomy posed of L. oculata, L. suboculata and three putative new species; Lycosa baulnyi group formed by the mag- Biogeography hrebian L. baulnyi and L. vachoni and Lycosa fasciiventris group that includes two widespread species, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa: Revision of the New Australian Genus Artoriopsis in A
    Zootaxa 1391: 1–34 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the new Australian genus Artoriopsis in a new subfamily of wolf spiders, Artoriinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) VOLKER W. FRAMENAU Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49 Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Austra- lia. Table of contents Abstract . .1 Introduction . .2 Methods . .3 Abbreviations . .3 Taxonomy . .4 Family Lycosidae Sundevall, 1833 . .4 Artoriinae subfam. nov. .4 Artoriopsis gen. nov. .5 Key to the species of Artoriopsis gen. nov.. .7 Artoriopsis expolita (L. Koch, 1877) comb. nov. .8 Artoriopsis anacardium sp. nov. .15 Artoriopsis eccentrica sp. nov. .19 Artoriopsis joergi sp. nov. .22 Artoriopsis klausi sp. nov. .24 Artoriopsis melissae sp. nov. .27 Artoriopsis whitehouseae sp. nov. .31 Acknowledgements . .33 References . .33 Abstract The new Australian wolf spider genus Artoriopsis is established with Artoriopsis expolita (L. Koch, 1877), comb. nov. as type species. Six further species, A. anacardium sp. nov., A. eccentrica sp. nov., A. joergi sp. nov., A. klausi sp. nov., A. melissae sp. nov. and A. whitehouseae sp. nov. complete the Australian fauna. Artoriopsis gen. nov. shows affinities with the Australasian genera Artoria Thorell, 1877 and Anoteropsis Koch, 1877, but differs by a distinct colour pattern of the opisthosoma (a dark diamond-shaped spot is cut in half by the light lanceolate cardiac mark). The basoembolic apo- physis of the male pedipalp is narrowest at its base and comparatively weakly sclerotised, whereas it is widest at its base and strongly sclerotised in Artoria and inverted L-shaped in Anoteropsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Arachnology
    AUSTRALASIAN ARACHNOLOGY Number 67: June 2003 Price $2 ISSN 0811-3696 Australasian Arachnology No. 67 Page 2 THE AUSTRALASIAN ARTICLES ARACHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY The newsletter depends on your contributions! We encourage articles on a We aim to promote interest in the a range of topics including current ecology, behaviour and taxonomy of research activities, student projects, arachnids of the Australasian region. upcoming events or behavioural observations. MEMBERSHIP Please send articles to the Editor: Membership is open to amateurs, Dr Tracey Churchill students and professionals, and is Museum & Art Gallery of the managed by our Administrator : Northern Territory GPO Box4646 Richard J. Faulder Darwin NT 0801 Agricultural Institute Australia. Yanco, New South Wales 2703. Australia. email: [email protected] email : [email protected] Format: i) typed or legibly printed on A4 paper or ii) as text or MS Word file on Membership fees in Australian dollars CD, 3 ~floppy disk, or via email. per 4 issues: Discount* Normal Institutional LIBRARY Australian $8 $10 $12 The MS has a large number of reference NZ/ Asia $10 $12 $14 books, scientific journals and papers Elsewhere $12 $14 $16 available for loan or as photocopies, for those members who do not have access to a scientific library. Professional All postage is by air mail. members are encouraged to send in their *Discount rates apply to unemployed, pensioners and students (please provide proof of status). arachnological reprints. Cheques payable in Australian dollars to Contact our librarian : "Australasian Arachnological Society". More than 4 issues can be paid for in Jean-Claude Herremans PO Box 291 advance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Wolf Spider Genus Diapontia Keyserling, and the Relationships of the Subfamily Sosippinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) 387-415 75 (3): 387– 415 20.12.2017
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2017 Band/Volume: 75 Autor(en)/Author(s): Piacentini Luis Norberto, Scioscia Cristina Luisa, Carbajal Mirta Noemi, Ott Ricardo, Brescovit Antonio Domingos, Ramirez Martin J. Artikel/Article: A revision of the wolf spider genus Diapontia Keyserling, and the relationships of the subfamily Sosippinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) 387-415 75 (3): 387– 415 20.12.2017 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2017. A revision of the wolf spider genus Diapontia Keyserling, and the relationships of the subfamily Sosippinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) Luis Norberto Piacentini *, 1, Cristina Luisa Scioscia 1, Mirta Noemí Carbajal 2, Ricardo Ott 3, Antonio Domingo Brescovit 4 & Martín Javier Ramírez 1 1 División Aracnología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” – CONICET, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina; Luis Norberto Piacentini [[email protected]]; Cristina Luisa Scioscia [[email protected]]; Martín Javier Ramírez [[email protected]] — 2 Fundación Inalafquen. H. Yrigoyen 792. 8520 San Antonio Oeste, Río Negro, Argentina; Mirta Noemí Carbajal [[email protected]] — 3 Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Dr. Salvador França, 1427, 90690- 000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Ricardo Ott [[email protected]] — 4 Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, Butantã, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, CEP 05503-900; Antonio Brescovit [[email protected]] — *Corresponding author Accepted 21.vi.2017. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 11.xii.2017. Editors in charge: Lorenzo Prendini & Klaus-Dieter Klass Abstract The South American genus Diapontia is revised to include nine species: Diapontia uruguayensis Keyserling, 1877 ( = Diapontia senescens Mello-Leitão, 1944 syn.n.; D.
    [Show full text]
  • Framenau, 2007, Australian New Genus Artoriopsis Zootaxa 1391
    Zootaxa 1391: 1–34 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the new Australian genus Artoriopsis in a new subfamily of wolf spiders, Artoriinae (Araneae: Lycosidae) VOLKER W. FRAMENAU Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49 Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Austra- lia. Email: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Methods . 3 Abbreviations . 3 Taxonomy . 4 Family Lycosidae Sundevall, 1833 . 4 Artoriinae subfam. nov. 4 Artoriopsis gen. nov. 5 Key to the species of Artoriopsis gen. nov. 7 Artoriopsis expolita (L. Koch, 1877) comb. nov. 8 Artoriopsis anacardium sp. nov. .15 Artoriopsis eccentrica sp. nov. .19 Artoriopsis joergi sp. nov. .22 Artoriopsis klausi sp. nov. .24 Artoriopsis melissae sp. nov. .27 Artoriopsis whitehouseae sp. nov. .31 Acknowledgements . .33 References . 33 Abstract The new Australian wolf spider genus Artoriopsis is established with Artoriopsis expolita (L. Koch, 1877), comb. nov. as type species. Six further species, A. anacardium sp. nov., A. eccentrica sp. nov., A. joergi sp. nov., A. klausi sp. nov., A. melissae sp. nov. and A. whitehouseae sp. nov. complete the Australian fauna. Artoriopsis gen. nov. shows affinities with the Australasian genera Artoria Thorell, 1877 and Anoteropsis Koch, 1877, but differs by a distinct colour pattern of the opisthosoma (a dark diamond-shaped spot is cut in half by the light lanceolate cardiac mark). The basoembolic apo- physis of the male pedipalp is narrowest at its base and comparatively weakly sclerotised, whereas it is widest at its base and strongly sclerotised in Artoria and inverted L-shaped in Anoteropsis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: a Phylogeographic Approach
    297 Insects 2011, 2, 297-325; doi:10.3390/insects2030297 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: A Phylogeographic Approach Steven A. Trewick 1,*, Graham P. Wallis 2 and Mary Morgan-Richards 1 1 Phoenix Lab, Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin North 9016, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +64 6 356 9099 ext. 2021; Fax: +64 6 350 5623. Received: 11 May 2011; in revised form: 16 June 2011 / Accepted: 17 June 2011 / Published: 1 July 2011 Abstract: Phylogeography contributes to our knowledge of regional biotas by integrating spatial and genetic information. In New Zealand, comprising two main islands and hundreds of smaller ones, phylogeography has transformed the way we view our biology and allowed comparison with other parts of the world. Here we review studies on New Zealand terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates. We find little evidence of congruence among studies of different taxa; instead there are signatures of partitioning in many different regions and expansion in different directions. A number of studies have revealed unusually high genetic distances within putative species, and in those where other data confirm this taxonomy, the revealed phylogeographic structure contrasts with northern hemisphere continental systems. Some taxa show a signature indicative of Pliocene tectonic events encompassing land extension and mountain building, whereas others are consistent with range expansion following the last glacial maximum (LGM) of the Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Using DNA Barcoding to Identify Spiders in Species-Rich Genera
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 16: 27-46Prospects (2009) for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.16.239 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera Emily A. Robinson, Gergin A. Blagoev, Paul D.N. Hebert, Sarah J. Adamowicz Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Corresponding author: Gergin A. Blagoev ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev | Received 1 June 2009 | Accepted 15 July 2009 | Published 29 July 2009 Citation: Robinson EA, Blagoev GA, Hebert PDN, Adamowicz SJ (2009) Prospects for using DNA barcoding to iden- tify spiders in species-rich genera. In: Stoev P, Dunlop J, Lazarov S (Eds) A life caught in a spider's web. Papers in arach- nology in honour of Christo Deltshev. ZooKeys 16: 27-46. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.16.239 Abstract While previous research has indicated the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying spider species sampled from a localized region, the eff ectiveness of this method over a broader geographic scale and with denser taxon sampling has not yet been extensively considered. Using both new and published data from 1801 individuals belonging to 361 morphospecies, this study examined intra- and interspecifi c divergences for 19 genera that were each represented by at least 10 morphospecies. We particularly focused on increasing species-level sampling in order to better characterize levels of interspecifi c divergence within species-rich genera and to examine the prevalence of a “barcode gap” (discontinuity between intra- and interspecifi c di- vergences).
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Spider'
    Package ‘spider’ February 16, 2018 Type Package Title Species Identity and Evolution in R Version 1.5.0 Date 2018-02-15 Author Samuel Brown, Rupert Collins, Stephane Boyer, Marie-Caroline Lefort, Jagoba Malumbres- Olarte, Cor Vink, Rob Cruickshank Maintainer Rupert A. Collins <[email protected]> Description Analysis of species limits and DNA barcoding data. Included are functions for generat- ing important summary statistics from DNA barcode data, assessing specimen identification effi- cacy, testing and optimizing divergence threshold limits, assessment of diagnostic nu- cleotides, and calculation of the probability of reciprocal monophyly. Additionally, a slid- ing window function offers opportunities to analyse information across a gene, of- ten used for marker design in degraded DNA studies. Further information on the pack- age has been published in Brown et al (2012) <doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x>. License MIT + file LICENSE LazyLoad yes Imports ape, pegas, graphics, stats, utils RoxygenNote 6.0.1 Suggests testthat NeedsCompilation no Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2018-02-16 19:33:47 UTC R topics documented: spider-package . .3 anoteropsis . .4 bestCloseMatch . .4 blockAlignment . .6 cgraph . .7 chaoHaplo . .8 1 2 R topics documented: checkDNA . .9 dataStat . 10 dolomedes . 11 haploAccum . 11 heatmapSpp . 13 is.ambig . 14 localMinima . 15 maxInDist . 16 minInDist . 17 monophyly . 19 monophylyBoot . 20 nearNeighbour . 22 nonConDist . 24 nucDiag . 26 ordinDNA . 27 paa.............................................. 29 plot.haploAccum . 30 plot.ordinDNA . 31 plot.slidWin . 33 polyBalance . 34 rankSlidWin . 35 read.BOLD . 38 read.GB . 39 rmSingletons . 41 rnucDiag . 42 rosenberg . 43 salticidae . 45 sarkar . 45 search.BOLD . 46 seeBarcode . 47 seqStat . 48 slideAnalyses .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Record of the Australian Wolf Spider Artoriopsis Expolita (L. Koch, 1877) (Araneae: Lycosidae) in New Zealand
    38 Cor Vink and Stephen Thorpe A new record of the Australian wolf spider Artoriopsis expolita (L. Koch, 1877) (Araneae: Lycosidae) in New Zealand Cor J. Vink1,2 and Stephen Thorpe3 1Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch 8013 2Entomology Research Museum, PO Box 85084, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142 Corresponding author: Cor J. Vink, Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch 8013 Email: [email protected] Artoriopsis is an Australian genus of wolf spiders (Lycosidae) that includes Artoriopsis expolita (L. Koch, 1877) and six other species (Framenau 2007). In 2010, a male specimen of A. expolita was caught in a pitfall trap at Shakespear Regional Park, which is at the tip of the Whangaparaoa Peninsula in the Auckland Region. The pitfall trap was part of an invertebrate survey by the Auckland Council. The specimen was identified using Framenau (2007). Artoriopsis expolita is the same size and looks superficially like Anoteropsis hilaris (L. Koch, 1877), which was also found at Shakespear Regional Park. Artoriopsis expolita can be differentiated from A. hilaris and all other New Zealand lycosids by the wide median and marginal bands on the carapace, the shape of the tegular apophysis of the male pedipalp and the large plate covering the atrium of the epigyne (Framenau 2007). A photo of the specimen can be seen at http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Artoriopsis_expolita.jpg. The specimen has been deposited in the Lincoln University Entomology Research Museum (LUNZ00012877). DNA was extracted non-destructively (Paquin & Vink 2009) from two legs using a ZR Genomic DNA™-Tissue MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research).
    [Show full text]
  • The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: a Phylogeographic Approach
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228476588 The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: A Phylogeographic Approach Article in Insects · December 2011 DOI: 10.3390/insects2030297 CITATIONS READS 22 75 3 authors: Steven A Trewick Graham P Wallis Massey University University of Otago 172 PUBLICATIONS 3,399 CITATIONS 231 PUBLICATIONS 4,249 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Mary Morgan-Richards Massey University 111 PUBLICATIONS 1,607 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Conservation Genetics of New Zealand Birds View project Evolutionary Genetics and Molecular Systematics of European Newts View project All content following this page was uploaded by Graham P Wallis on 21 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 297 Insects 2011, 2, 297-325; doi:10.3390/insects2030297 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review The Invertebrate Life of New Zealand: A Phylogeographic Approach Steven A. Trewick 1,*, Graham P. Wallis 2 and Mary Morgan-Richards 1 1 Phoenix Lab, Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin North 9016, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +64 6 356 9099 ext. 2021; Fax: +64 6 350 5623. Received: 11 May 2011; in revised form: 16 June 2011 / Accepted: 17 June 2011 / Published: 1 July 2011 Abstract: Phylogeography contributes to our knowledge of regional biotas by integrating spatial and genetic information.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Phylogeographic Congruence in a Continental Island System
    Insects 2011, 2, 369-399; doi:10.3390/insects2030369 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Article Exploring Phylogeographic Congruence in a Continental Island System Julia Goldberg *,† and Steven A. Trewick Phoenix Lab, Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand; E-Mail: [email protected] † Present address: Georg-August-University Göttingen, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institute for Zoology & Anthropology, Department for Morphology, Systematics & Evolutionary Biology, Berliner Str. 28, 37073 Göttingen, Germany * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Fax: +49 (0)551 395579. Received: 08 June 2011; in revised form: 4 July 2011 / Accepted: 11 July 2011 / Published: 3 August 2011 Abstract: A prediction in phylogeographic studies is that patterns of lineage diversity and timing will be similar within the same landscape under the assumption that these lineages have responded to past environmental changes in comparable ways. Eight invertebrate taxa from four different orders were included in this study of mainland New Zealand and Chatham Islands lineages to explore outcomes of island colonization. These comprised two orthopteran genera, one an endemic forest-dwelling genus of cave weta (Rhaphidophoridae, Talitropsis) and the other a grasshopper (Acrididae, Phaulacridum) that inhabits open grassland; four genera of Coleoptera including carabid beetles (Mecodema), stag beetles (Geodorcus), weevils (Hadramphus) and clickbeetles (Amychus); the widespread earwig genus Anisolabis (Dermaptera) that is common on beaches in New Zealand and the Chatham Islands, and an endemic and widespread cockroach genus Celatoblatta (Blattodea). Mitochondrial DNA data were used to reconstruct phylogeographic hypotheses to compare among these taxa.
    [Show full text]