DOCSLIB.ORG

West Java : Tough Fight in Key Battleground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Java : Tough Fight in Key Battleground This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Indonesian Presidential Election 2019 – West Java : Tough Fight in Key Battleground Keoni, Indrabayu Marzuki; Chaula, Rininta Anindya 2019 Keoni, I. M., & Chaula, R. A. (2019). Indonesian Presidential Election 2019 – West Java : Tough Fight in Key Battleground. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 050). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81761 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 25 Sep 2021 17:32:58 SGT Indonesian Presidential Election 2019 West Java: Tough Fight in Key Battleground By Keoni Marzuki and Chaula R. Anindya SYNOPSIS Home to roughly 33 million eligible voters in the coming national elections, West Java is seeing both presidential candidates Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto clash in a tough fight for votes. How well they do in this province may be pivotal to their quest for the presidency. COMMENTARY PRESIDENT JOKO Widodo (“Jokowi”) certainly does not want to repeat the disastrous result of the 2014 presidential election in West Java; he lost decisively – with a margin of 4.6 million votes – to his contender Prabowo Subianto. Since taking office, President Jokowi has paid greater attention to West Java through various means. Primarily he prioritises several infrastructure projects in the province – the Kertajati Airport in Majalengka, which is three hours away by car from Bandung, and the Bogor-Ciawi- Sukabumi (Bocimi) toll road, among at least 30 other infrastructure projects in West Java under the National Strategic Project flagship. Prabowo, on the other hand, has been focusing on Central Java – a primary stronghold of his party, PDIP, and the president’s home province. Nonetheless, Prabowo does have strong standing in West Java, thanks to his popularity in the province, as well as a loyal support base, devoted volunteer groups and his party Gerindra’s disciplined machinery. West Java in the Bag for Jokowi? Several internal polling by President Jokowi’s National Campaign Team (TKN) and Regional Campaign Team (TKD) show that his electability rating in West Java has steadily risen to match Prabowo’s since early-2018. A member of the president’s campaign team even claimed that his electability rating in West Java has surpassed that of Prabowo. A poll by Bravo-5, one of Jokowi’s volunteer groups, indicated that his electability rating in West Java stands at 54.4 per cent. Polling by survey institutions such as Indikator Politik Indonesia and Alvara Research Centre in June and August 2018 respectively, seems to support this claim. An exit poll taken by Saiful Mujani Research and Consulting (SMRC) just after the 2018 West Java gubernatorial election, however, shows a different story. About 51.2 percent of West Java’s electorate prefer Prabowo over Jokowi if the presidential election were held on the same day of the West Java regional elections. Pressure on Jokowi Moreover, slander about President Jokowi’s anti-Islamic stance persists. This is exemplified by a recent video showing three women in Karawang (allegedly affiliated to one of Prabowo’s volunteer groups) forewarning Jokowi’s supposed anti-Islam and pro-LGBT policies. As professed by the president himself, the relentless disinformation campaign against him causes his electability rating in West Java to fluctuate. The incessant black campaign also raises some questions regarding the benefit of having Ma’ruf Amin as Jokowi’s running mate, whom the president picked to act mainly as a bulwark against this particular form of campaign. Additionally, Ma’ruf Amin’s appeal to Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) constituents in West Java may not be as impactful as initially expected. While NU constituents in West Java practise similar Islamic customs with those of NU in Central and East Java, they do not necessarily conform to the political leanings of its central board. NU West Java also suffers internal fragmentation whereby a number of regional leaders are affiliated with conservative movements. An example would be the local NU leaders in the Tasikmalaya region who simultaneously serve as the head of the conservative Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) in their respective regions. Rerun of Prabowo’s Domination? If the surprising result of the 2018 West Java gubernatorial election is any indication, the Prabowo camp can be confident of their electoral chances. After all, the initially uncompetitive Sudrajat-Syaikhu ticket (endorsed by Prabowo’s Gerindra and its allies PKS and PAN), managed to defy expectations and successfully beat one of the strong contenders in the race. But whether they could replicate the surprising result of the 2018 West Java gubernatorial election and the 2014 presidential election is an open question, despite Prabowo’s popularity and large numbers of his staunch supporters in the province. PKS, one of Prabowo’s coalition partners, has been plagued by internal strife due to sharp factionalism within the party leadership at the national level. Some disillusioned party members who left and/or booted out of the party form their own political movement called the Indonesia’s New Direction Movement (GARBI). The movement naturally attracts like-minded individuals from PKS, which consequentially distract the party from the election. PKS also has some issues at the regional level. Ahmad Heryawan, the former governor of West Java and one of the party’s prominent functionaries, has been summoned by the Anti-Corruption Commission KPK in relation to a real estate development project. Heryawan was one of the instrumental driving forces that helped mobilised support for the Sudrajat-Syaikhu pair in the gubernatorial election. Taken together, these issues have the potential to negatively affect the party’s usually-potent campaign machinery and political networks in West Java. Lessons from the 2018 West Java Gubernatorial Election The 2018 West Java gubernatorial election hold several lessons for both presidential candidates. First, Islam remains a dominant political force in the province. Both camps are cognisant of the pivotal role of Islam in the region. In October 2018, Prabowo’s vice-presidential running mate Sandiaga Uno and the chairman of PAN Zulkifli Hasan visited Miftahul Huda II. This is an offshoot of the Miftahul Huda pesantren (Islamic boarding school) in Tasikmalaya, where they praised the pesantren’s contribution to the 212 Movement that toppled the controversial Jakarta governor. The school has declared its support for Uno who is considered as a young and pious leader. Similarly, both President Jokowi and his running mate Ma’ruf Amin visited a number of pesantren and paid respects to influential local clerics across the province. The Jokowi camp also approached Miftahul Huda and its vast alumni network with the assistance of the deputy governor of West Java who is a descendant of the madrasah’s founder. Influential clerics and madrasah have sway over the electorate as some voters look up to them for counsel. Pivotal Endorsements from Local Figures Second, endorsements from influential local notables are quite pivotal in shaping voters’ preferences. These notables play the role of political power brokers called ajengan (which generally refer to renowned Islamic scholars) and menak (typically refer to the aristocracy, but in the context of modern West Java could also refer to highly respected political figures). President Jokowi’s TKN, for example, has been attracting endorsements and political support from local figures – such as Solihin GP, Ginandjar Kartasasmita, Agum Gumelar, as well as candidates of the West Java gubernatorial election such as Ridwan Kamil, Deddy Mizwar and Dedi Mulyadi – to secure his victory. Third, eleventh-hour electoral tactics, ranging from money politics to black campaigns disseminated through social media, can have impact on both candidates. As these tactics are generally delivered days, or even hours, before the election, they have the potency of changing voters’ preferences. Keoni Marzuki is a Senior Analyst with the Indonesia Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. Chaula R. Anindya is a Research Analyst with the programme. This is part of an RSIS Series on the 2019 Indonesian presidential election. Nanyang Technological University Block S4, Level B3, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798 Tel: +65 6790 6982 | Fax: +65 6794 0617 | www.rsis.edu.sg .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planned Deforestation: Forest Policy in Papua | 1
    PLANNED DEFORESTATION: FOREST POLICY IN PAPUA | 1 Planned Deforestation Forest Policy in Papua PLANNED DEFORESTATION: FOREST POLICY IN PAPUA | 3 CITATION: Koalisi Indonesia Memantau. 2021. Planned Deforestation: Forest Policy in Papua. February, 2021. Jakarta, Indonesia. Dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Koalisi Indonesia Memantau. 2021. Menatap ke Timur: Deforestasi dan Pelepasan Kawasan Hutan di Tanah Papua. Februari, 2021. Jakarta, Indonesia. Photo cover: Ulet Ifansasti/Greenpeace PLANNED DEFORESTATION: FOREST POLICY IN PAPUA | 3 1. INDONESIAN DEFORESTATION: TARGETING FOREST-RICH PROVINCES Deforestation, or loss of forest cover, has fallen in Indonesia in recent years. Consequently, Indonesia has received awards from the international community, deeming the country to have met its global emissions reduction commitments. The Norwegian Government, in line with the Norway – Indonesia Letter of Intent signed during the Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono presidency, paid USD 56 million,1 equivalent to IDR 812 billion, that recognizes Indonesia’s emissions achievements.2 Shortly after that, the Green Climate Fund, a funding facility established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), agreed to a funding proposal submitted by Indonesia for USD 103.8 million3, equivalent to IDR 1.46 trillion, that supports further reducing deforestation. 923,050 923,550 782,239 713,827 697,085 639,760 511,319 553,954 508,283 494,428 485,494 461,387 460,397 422,931 386,328 365,552 231,577 231,577 176,568 184,560 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 Figure 1. Annual deforestation in Indonesia from 2001-2019 (in hectares). Deforestation data was obtained by combining the Global Forest Change dataset from the University of Maryland’s Global Land Analysis and Discovery (GLAD) and land cover maps from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF).
    [Show full text]
  • Jokowi Sworn in to Tackle a Divided Indonesian Government
    20 October 2014 https://theconversation.com/jokowi-sworn-in-to-tackle-a-divided-indonesian-government-33026 Jokowi sworn in to tackle a divided Indonesian government Joko Widodo (right) will replace Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as Indonesian president. He faces strong opposition in the parliament. EPA/Made Nagi Indonesia’s president-elect Joko Widodo, popularly known as Jokowi, will be sworn into office today in a divisive political environment. Jokowi, who won 53.15% of the votes in the presidential election, will have to work with a parliament controlled by the opposing coalition. Defeated candidate Prabowo Subianto’s Red-and-White coalition holds 292 seats. Parties supporting Jokowi hold 207 seats. On Friday, Jokowi met with Prabowo after months of political tension. Prabowo stated that his party should now support the new president. He also said that he would remain critical if the government went against the people’s aspiration. The meeting does not ensure Prabowo’s coalition will go along with the Jokowi government. Although Prabowo did not say it openly, being critical could still also mean being obstructive to Jokowi’s reform plans. Divided government Indonesia’s current political landscape, in which different political parties or different coalitions of parties control different branches of government, is generally referred to as “divided government”. 1 A divided government is nothing new. It happens in developing as well as in developed countries. It happened in Ecuador after the military regime in 1979 as well as in Mexico between 1997 and 2000. Germany and the United States also have divided governments. At times, a divided government can result in better checks and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Hob Pontianak
    VIDEO RELEASE 2 October 2013 Camera traps produce first ever hard evidence of Sumatran rhino population in Kalimantan forests Lampung, Sumatra – Using video camera traps, a joint research team that included members from WWF- Indonesia and the district authorities of Kutai Barat, East Kalimantan, have captured video of the Sumatran rhino in East Kalimantan. The footage of the rhinos --- the rare Dicerorhinus sumatrensis --- is the fruit of three months of research that collected footage from 16 video camera traps. The team is delighted to have secured the first known visual evidence of the Sumatran rhino in Kalimantan. “This physical evidence is very important, as it forms the basis to develop and implement more comprehensive conservation efforts for the Indonesian rhinoceros,” said Forestry Minister Zulkifli Hasan upon unveiling the video at the opening of the Asian Rhino Range States Ministrial Meeting in Lampung, Sumatra. “This finding represents the hard work of many parties, and will hopefully contribute to achieving Indonesia's target of three percent per year rhino population growth.” He emphasized that all parties need to immediately begin working together to develop a scientific estimate of all the remaining Sumatran rhino populations in Kalimantan, and to implement measures to conserve the species --- particularly by strengthening the protection and security of the rhinos and their habitats. The remarkable evidence from the camera traps includes footage of a rhino wallowing in the mud to keep its body temperature cool and a rhino walking in search of food. The rhino footage, captured on June 23, June 30 and August 3, is believed to show different rhinos although confirmation of this will require further study.
    [Show full text]
  • SVLK Program
    MINISTRY OF FORESTRY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION TIMBER LEGALITY VERIVICATION SYSTEM (SVLK) AND THE VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (VPA) 1. What is the SVLK? SVLK stands for Sistem Verifikasi Legalitas Kayu, or Timber LeGality Assurance System in EnGlish. It is desiGned to check the leGality of timber from the forest throuGh to the point of export using independent auditors. ThrouGh multi-stakeholder consultation since 2003, finally in June 2009 the Government of Indonesia issued the Minister of Forestry Decree No. P. 38/Menhut-II/2009 on the Standards and Guidelines of Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) and Timber Legality Verification for Permit Holders or Private Forest. This new SVLK reGulation, has been in force since September 2009. At the end of 2011, the reGulation was revised and improved by the issuance of Minister of Forestry ReGulation No. P68/Menhut-II/2011. 2. Why is SVLK needed? This is an Indonesian effort to assure the leGality of its timber products, which is in line with the trend of major timber market Globally and will meet this stronGer demand for leGal timber. The Government of Japan applies Goho-wood or Green Konjuho which requires that timber imported into the country comes from legal sources. The Government of the United States of America amended the Lacey Act, aimed at avoiding import of illegal timber into the country. The European Union issued ReGulation No. 995/2010 (Timber ReGulation) obliGinG operator to possess irrefutable proofs that timber products that they trade do not come from illeGal sources and prohibitinG illeGal timber. 3. How does the SVLK operate? P.
    [Show full text]
  • Survei-Nasional-Y-Publica-V03.Pdf
    METODOLOGI DAN RESPONDEN • Survei nasional ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif • Jumlah sampel adalah 1200 responden, dipilih secara acakbertingkat (multistage random sampling), mewakili 120 desa dari 34 provinsi di Indonesia • Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara tatap muka kepada responden terpilih menggunakan alat bantu kuisioner • Tenaga pewawancara dalam survei ini adalah mahasiswa yang telah mendapatkan pelatihan • Estimasi margin error adalah 2,98% dengan tingkat kepercayaan 95% • Pengambilan data dilakukan pada 2-12 Mei 2018 KUALITAS UJI SURVEI Pra-Survei • Pelatihan metode survei dan kuesioner kepada tim enumerator oleh ahli survei • Pelatihan teknik wawancara kuesioner kepada tim pewancara yang terdiri dari mahasiswa • Diskusi terbatas tentang pertanyaan-pertanyaan dan target kuisioner Survei: • Spotcheck (pengecekan di lapangan) terhadap 20% responden yang dipilih secara acak • Call-back (20% responden secara acak) oleh tim untuk memastikan penarikan sampel responden dan wawancara dengan responden telah dilakukan dengan benar Pasca-survei • Entry data dan pengolahan data KOMPOSISI RESPONDEN Jenis kelamin Pendidikan Terakhir Suku Bangsa Laki-laki 49.7% Tidak Tamat SD 4.9% Jawa 40.2% Sunda 16.4% Perempuan 50.3% Tamat SD 14.4% Bugis 2.5% Tamat SMP 20.7% Minangkabau 2.7% Usia Tamat SLTA/Sederajat 47.2% Betawi 2.7% Pemilih Pemula (17-21) 7.2% Tamat Diploma (D1, D2, D3) 5.0% Batak 2.6% Pemilih Muda (22-35) 36.4% Tamat Sarjana (S1, S2, S3) 7.8% Melayu 2.5% Pemilih Dewasa (36-50) 31.8% Madura 2.4% Pemilih Matang (51-60)
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARDS a MORE EQUAL INDONESIA How the Government Can Take Action to Close the Gap Between the Richest and the Rest
    OXFAM BRIEFING PAPER FEBRUARY 2017 Looking at the future: a father holds his daughter as he stands on a site where residents have recently been evicted from nearby luxury apartments in North Jakarta. Photo: Tiara Audina/Antropology UI TOWARDS A MORE EQUAL INDONESIA How the government can take action to close the gap between the richest and the rest In the past two decades, the gap between the richest and the rest in Indonesia has grown faster than in any other country in South-East Asia. The four richest men in Indonesia now have more wealth than the poorest 100 million people. Inequality is slowing down poverty reduction, dampening economic growth and threatening social cohesion. President Jokowi has made fighting inequality his administration’s top priority for 2017. He can achieve this by enforcing a living wage for all workers, increasing spending on public services, and making big corporations and rich individuals pay their fair share of tax. www.oxfam.org SUMMARY Since 2000, economic growth has taken off in Indonesia. There has been a significant increase in the country’s score on the UN’s Human Development Index (HDI), and the proportion of people living in extreme poverty has fallen from 40 percent to 8 percent. However, the benefits of growth have not been shared equally, and millions have been left behind. If the $3.10 World Bank ‘moderate’ poverty line is used, the number of Indonesians living in poverty shoots up to 93 million (36 percent of the population). Many more Indonesians live just above the poverty line, making them vulnerable to falling back into poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Native LGBT Led to Live Naturally with No Homosexual Behaviour
    Indonesian Cleric: Native LGBT Led To Live Naturally with No Homosexual Behaviour [AH19_260118_AntoniusHerujiyanto_USD_Yk.] One of the sons of the leader of the Indonesian Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) cleric Abu Bakar Ba’asyir is cleric Abdul Rochim Ba’asyir. Like many other Indonesian Islamic leaders, cleric Abdul has also participated in talking about LGBT, an issue that has been in the Indonesian news lately. [It was not for the very first time that the important political leaders from the (Islamic) National Mandate Party or PAN (the party is strongly supported by Muhammadiyah—the second largest Islamic community organization in Indonesia—issued a controversial issue with the aim of getting popularity during a political season such as regional and general elections. This was exactly conducted by the present General Chairman of PAN, who happens to be the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) Speaker, Zulkifli Hasan. The Indonesian regional elections are taking place in 2018.] [It was reported by the Indonesian Islamic Daily Republika (republika.co.id.), that Zulkifli Hasan had made a controversial statement during his visit to the campus of Muhammadiyah University in Surabaya on Saturday (20 January). He said that there were five Indonesian political parties supporting LGBT and the same sex marriage. He also mentioned that there were eight Fractions in the House of Representatives or DPR which agreed with the idea of allowing Indonesian warung or small restaurants to put alcoholic drinks in their menus.] [Both LGBT and alcoholic drinks are two important things which are strongly prohibited in Islamic teachings.] Unlike most ulema who are strongly against LGBT, cleric Abdul Rochim Ba’asyir has talked about how to treat the native LGBT or Two Spirit communities who are categorized as having suffered from LGBT’s [homosexual] behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the 2019 Indonesian Elections
    GUIDE TO THE 2019 INDONESIA ELECTIONS KEVIN EVANS INDONESIA DIRECTOR, THE AUSTRALIA-INDONESIA CENTRE ELECTION DAY IN 2019 On Wed 17 April 2019, 190 million Indonesian voters will set off to the polls to elect their President and Vice-President. On this day they will also elect 136 members of the national Regions House, a kind of weak Senate, together with 575 members of the powerful House of Representatives. In addition they will elect 2,207 provincial level MPs from the 34 Provinces and also elect 17,610 local councillors across more than 500 local authorities. GUIDE TO THE 2019 INDONESIA ELECTIONS THE PATH TO THE PRESIDENCY To win the election, a Presidential/Vice-presidential team must secure over 50% of the popular vote. If no candidate secures 50% of the vote in the first round then the top two candidate pairs face off in a second round. The path to winning the election, however, consists of several stages. The process begins with nomination. While Indonesia today, like the USA, operates a presidential system of government, the DNA from the country’s various old parliamentary systems is often close to the surface. For example, candidacy is determined by demonstrating support from parties in the House of Representatives (DPR). A candidate team needs to show they have the support of parties commanding at least 20% of seats in the current DPR or 25% of the votes their parties secured in the last election. Given that there are no large parties in the current Parliament (the largest party commands less than 20% of the seats and votes), candidate teams invariably form coalitions of support.
    [Show full text]
  • State Homophobia in Indonesia Securitization of LGBT People in Indonesia 2000-2016
    State Homophobia in Indonesia Securitization of LGBT People in Indonesia 2000-2016 Bella de Lange S2019566 [email protected] MA Thesis International Relations December 24, 2019 Supervisor: Rizal Shidiq Abstract This thesis aims to answer the question of why the Indonesian state has increasingly securitized LGBT people in Indonesia from 2000 to 2016, by focusing on two factors: public homophobia and state homophobia. Data on public attitudes toward the LGBT community in Indonesia will be drawn from various surveys conducted after 2000s. These surveys measure attitudes on existing heteronormative ideals in Indonesian society and capture the conservative turn starting from 1998 during the post- democratic transition period. The increasing threat of homosexuality as propagated by the Indonesian state will be historically and systematically analyzed through a number of statements made by political elites. Strong evidence is found on public and state homophobia increasing in Indonesia and this materializing politically and legally. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 3 2.1 State Homophobia 3 2.2 Securitization 6 2.3 Public Opinion and Political Tolerance 8 3. Research Method 10 4. Empirical Findings 12 4.1 The Rise of Indonesian State Homophobia since 2000 12 4.1.1 Historical Context 12 4.1.2 Democratic Indonesia 12 4.2 Voters’ Preference in Democratic Indonesia 19 4.3 The State Securitizing LGBT Indonesians 29 5. Conclusion 37 Bibliography 39 1. Introduction “LGBT must be banned, like we banned communism and drug trafficking.” This statement, made by Berliana Kartakusumah, Secretary-General of the People’s Conscience Party in Indonesia, explicitly aligns the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) movement in the same category as a dangerous political ideology (Singgih 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • CALON WAKIL PRESIDEN PENILAIAN ELITE, OPINION LEADER, DAN MASSA PEMILIH NASIONAL Temuan Survei Mei 2018
    CALON WAKIL PRESIDEN PENILAIAN ELITE, OPINION LEADER, DAN MASSA PEMILIH NASIONAL Temuan Survei Mei 2018 Jl. Kusumaatmaja No. 59, Menteng, Jakarta Pusat 10340 [email protected] | www.saifulmujani.com LATAR BELAKANG } Berbagai studi dan pengalaman pemilihan presiden selama ini menunjukan pentingnya persepsi pemilih tentang tokoh yang bersaing dalam Pilpres dan juga pemilihan kepala daerah. Persepsi ini sangat menentukan hasil akhir Pilpres atau Pilkada. } Persepsi tentang tokoh terutama berkaitan dengan persepsi atau opini atas “kualitas personal” tokoh-tokoh tersebut. } Opini yang reliable seseorang tentang tokoh-tokoh tak bisa dipisahkan dengan informasi yang dimilikinya tentang tokoh-tokoh tersebut. Survey Mei 2018 2 ... lanjutan } Untuk mendapatkan opini yang reliable tentang kualitas tokoh yang akan menjadi kontestan dalam politik dibutuhkan informan yang kompeten juga. } Di samping itu, sopistikasi pengertian kualitas tokoh juga menentukan informan macam apa yang dibutuhkan untuk mendapatkan opini yang reliable. } Pengertian kualitas tokoh menyangkut banyak dimensi: Kapabilitas/kompetensi termasuk menjaga kontinuitas program yang dinilai positif, integritas, empati, dan akseptabilitas. Survey Mei 2018 3 …lanjutan } Kapabilitas/kompetensi/kemampuan: memahami masalah, tahu yang terbaik dan harus dilakukan, mampu memimpin. } Integritas/track-record: bisa dipercaya, amanah, bersih dari cacat hukum, dari perbuatan tercela (moral). } Empati: bisa memahami kondisi dan bersimpati pada rakyat yang kurang beruntung. } Akseptabilitas:
    [Show full text]
  • Masalah Calon Presiden Populer
    DINAMIKA ELEKTORAL JELANG PILPRES DAN PILEG SERENTAK 2019 Temuan Survei: Nasional, 25-31 Maret 2018 Pengantar • Pemilihan Presiden (Pilpres) dan Pemilihan Legislatif (Pileg) akan dilakukan serentak pada 17 April 2019 yang akan datang. Rangkaian tahapan untuk itu sudah dilakukan sejak sekarang, dimana pendaftaran calon presiden (Capres) dan calon wakil presiden (Cawapres) akan dilaksanakan pada 4–10 Agustus 2018. • Karenanya, ada dua hal yang perlu diamati dari hal tersebut: • (1) Bagaimana peta besar kekuatan politik: peta kekuatan partai-partai, poros capres yang akan terbentuk dan peluang para capres? • (2) Bagaimana peta pemilih dalam Pilpres dan Pileg tersebut? • Survei nasional (surnas) Indikator Politik Indonesia (Indikator) Maret 2018 menemukan temuan menarik soal tersebut. Data surnas ini juga dilengkapi dengan temuan surnas sebelumnya (Februari 2018) dan survei opini publik yang dilakukan di Provinsi Jawa Barat pada 5-13 Maret 2018 dan Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 12-21 Maret 2018. Survei Nasional, Maret 2018 | 2 Metodologi • Populasi survei ini adalah seluruh warga negara Indonesia yang yang punya hak pilih dalam pemilihan umum, yakni mereka yang sudah berumur 17 tahun atau lebih, atau sudah menikah ketika survei dilakukan. • Dari populasi itu dipilih secara random menggunakan metode multistage random sampling. • Responden terpilih diwawancarai lewat tatap muka oleh pewawancara yang telah dilatih. • Quality control terhadap hasil wawancara dilakukan secara random sebesar 20% dari total sampel oleh supervisor dengan kembali mendatangi responden terpilih (spot check). Dalam quality control tidak ditemukan kesalahan berarti. • Jumlah sampel untuk survei nasional Maret 2018 sebanyak 1200 responden. Margin of error sekitar +/- 2.9% pada tingkat kepercayaan 95% (dengan asumsi simple random sampling). Jumlah sampel surnas Februari 2018 sebanyak 2020 responden.
    [Show full text]
  • Oligarki Tambang Di Balik Pilpres 2019
    P A K E T I N F O R M A S I OLIGARKI TAMBANG DI BALIK PILPRES 2019 www.jatam.org JATAM @jatamnas @jatamnas JATAM Nasional 1 Mengapa Penting Menyoroti Relasi Oligarki Tambang dan Energi dalam Pemilu 2019? Setiap lima tahun, kita disuguhkan dengan sorak-sorai demokrasi bernama pemilihan umum (pemilu). Tokoh- tokoh serta partai politik berlomba-lomba untuk memenangkan suara rakyat Indonesia. Janji-janji untuk membawa perubahan bertaburan sepanjang masa kampanye, tapi tidak pernah menyasar pada perubahan besar bagi keselamatan rakyat dan lingkungan hidup. Pemilu adalah kesempatan yang dimanfaatkan oleh oligark tambang dan energi untuk mendapatkan legitimasi kekuasaan dalam mengendalikan kebijakan dan anggaran publik demi memperbesar keuntungan bagi kelompoknya. Oligarki tambang dan energi berada di kedua kubu calon presiden dan wakil presiden, mereka adalah bagian langsung dari kandidat atau yang menjadi penyandang dana. Ijon Politik merupakan cara yang mereka gunakan dengan cara para oligark mensponsori kebutuhan kampanye para kandidat. Sebagai timbal baliknya, mereka akan diberikan keamanan investasi dan izin untuk mengeksploitasi kekayaan alam, ruang hidup rakyat. Pemilu telah lama dikooptasi untuk kepentingan oligark tanpa memperhitungkan keselamatan rakyat dan keberlangsungan layanan dan fungsi alam. Pemilu begitu penting bagi oligark tambang dan energi dan menjadikan ruang hidup kita sebagai taruhannya. Laporan visual ini dikeluarkan oleh Jaringan Advokasi Tambang (JATAM) untuk disebarluaskan dan dijadikan pedoman politik oleh rakyat yang berada di garis depan berhadapan dengan krisis akibat tambang dan energi. Kami mengajak khalayak untuk ikut berpartisipasi, salah satunya dengan menambahkan informasi yang dianggap penting untuk memperkaya laporan visual ini. Sumber data laporan visual ini berasal dari database JATAM dan penelusuran aktor-aktor dan perusahaan berdasarkan data beneficial ownership yang diakses 2oleh JATAM.
    [Show full text]