DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of P-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase-Inhibiting Herbicides for Controlling Mugwort

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of P-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase-Inhibiting Herbicides for Controlling Mugwort per nursery (Gilliam et al., 1990; Evaluation of p-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Mathers, 1999). Yet, control options Dioxygenase-inhibiting Herbicides for for mugwort are limited due in part to challenges presented by herbicide costs, Controlling Mugwort herbicide phytosafety across desirable crop commodities (including turfgrass 1,2,7 1,3,5 2,6 and ornamentals), and limited efficacy William E. Klingeman , Gregory R. Armel ,HenryP.Wilson , available herbicides may have on other Thomas E. Hines4,6,JoseJ.Vargas1, and Philip C. Flanagan1 key weed species. For example, ethyl N, N-di-n-propylthiolcarbamate applica- tion at 15 lb/acre has controlled mug- ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Artemisia vulgaris, atrazine, bentazon, clopyralid, false wort in field nurseries, yet this rate is chrysanthemum, HPPD, mesotrione, PSII inhibitor, topramezone toohightosafelymanagemugwortin SUMMARY. Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) is a perennial invasive weed species that stands of field corn (Bing and Pridham, has infiltrated row crops, turfgrass, ornamentals, and various noncrop areas. 1963, 1964). Glyphosate is effective on Currently, multiple mimics of indole-3-acetic acid can provide control of this young mugwort plants but is less effec- species; however, these herbicides can damage certain sensitive ornamental plants. tive at controlling large mugwort plants When applied at reduced rates, the p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)- in later stages of growth (Ahrens, 1976; inhibiting herbicides mesotrione and topramezone have demonstrated some Bradley and Hagood, 2002a, 2002b). selectivity among certain ornamental plants. Field and greenhouse studies were initiated to evaluate whether these herbicides could control mugwort when applied Plant growth regulating herbicides that alone, or in mixtures with photosystem II (PSII)-inhibiting herbicides that often mimic indole-3-acetic acid, like 2,4- provide synergistic weed control. In the field, mesotrione controlled mugwort dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and clopyr- between 30% and 60% by 21 days after treatment when applied at 0.093 to 0.187 alid, have generally provided poor lb/acre. When the PSII-inhibiting herbicide atrazine was added, control increased mugwort control, even at high applica- to 78% and 79%. In the greenhouse, similar rates produced greater control in tion rates (Ahrens, 1976; Bingham, mugwort, and all mesotrione treatments limited mugwort regrowth by at least 95% 1965; Bradley and Hagood, 2002a, when compared with untreated control. When HPPD inhibitor rates were reduced 2002b; Day et al., 1997). Clopyralid further, the addition of the PSII inhibitors atrazine or bentazon was not sufficient at providing acceptable control of mugwort. can control mugwort and reduce regrowth the following year, yet clo- pyralid is relatively expensive, has lim- ugwort or false chrysanthe- crop plants (Barney and DiTommasso, ited efficacy against other commonly mum is an adaptable, non- 2003; Bradley and Hagood, 2002a, encountered weed species, and is chal- Mnative perennial plant that is 2002b; Holm et al., 1997; Rogerson lenged by limited crop safety across a management challenge to commer- and Bingham, 1964; Uva et al., 1997). a diverse assemblage of ornamental cial agronomic and ornamental crop In nursery fields, rhizomes are abundant plant species (Bradley and Hagood, production worldwide (Barney and in the upper 4 inches of soil (Pridham, 2002a, 2002b; Bradley et al., 2000; DiTommasso, 2003; Henderson and 1963; Rogerson and Bingham, 1964). Day et al., 1997; Koepke-Hill et al., Weller, 1985; Holm et al., 1997; Uva Tillage will exacerbate localized 2011). Still, the broad utility of clopyr- et al., 1997). In the eastern United mugwort infestation because rhi- alid (StingerÒ and TranslineÒ;Dow States, mugwort has expanded be- zome sections 2-cm long reproduce AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN) across yond ornamental nurseries into turf, well when grown in pine bark, sand, corn, sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris), pasture pastures, and cropping systems includ- and soil substrates (Guncan, 1982; and rangeland, Christmas tree, orna- ing corn (Zea mays), cotton (Gossypium Klingeman et al., 2004; Rogerson mental plant, and fruit and vegetable hirsutum), and soybean (Glycine max) et al., 1972). crop production systems makes this (Bradley and Hagood, 2002a, 2002b; Postemergence (POST) control herbicide a practical choice for selective Yelverton et al., 2012). of weeds in nursery operations re- control of mugwort. Mugwort reproduction and dis- mains a particularly attractive option Mesotrione and topramezone persal is achieved primarily by transport for both field-grown and container impede carotenoid biosynthesis by of rhizome pieces on contaminated cul- production systems due, in part, to inhibiting the enzyme p-HPPD (Norris tivation equipment and within soil and need to reduce labor costs incurred et al., 1998). Mesotrione is registered soilless substrates around the roots of for hand-weeding in addition to the for preemergence (PRE) and POST current practice of making about applications in corn and turfgrass 1Plant Sciences Department, The University of Ten- three annual herbicide applications (BASF, 2013; Mitchell et al., 2001; nessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996 2Professor 3Assistant Professor Units 4Research Associate To convert U.S. to SI, To convert SI to U.S., 5Current address: BASF Corporation, Research Tri- multiply by U.S unit SI unit multiply by angle Park, NC 27709. 0.3048 ft m 3.2808 6Current address: Eastern Shore Agricultural Research 9.3540 gal/acre LÁha–1 0.1069 and Extension Center, Virginia Tech, Painter, VA 2.54 inch(es) cm 0.3937 23420. 1.1209 lb/acre kgÁha–1 0.8922 7Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. 6.8948 psi kPa 0.1450 • August 2014 24(4) 433 RESEARCH REPORTS Syngenta Crop Protection, 2011, (Weigela florida), spiraea (Spiraea ja- All treatments contained 1% (v/v) crop 2012) and provides effective POST ponica), arborvitae (Thuja plicata), oil concentrate [COC (Agridex; Hel- control against many annual broad- herbaceous daylily (Hemerocallis), ena Chemical, Memphis, TN)] and leaf weeds and certain grass species hosta (Hosta), autumn fern (Dryopteris 2.5% (v/v) urea ammonium nitrate (Armel et al., 2003, 2009; Beckett erythrosora), and pachysandra (Pachy- (UAN) solution. Experimental plots and Taylor, 2000; Sutton et al., sandra terminalis) (Cutulle et al., were8.3ftwideby20ftlongandwere 1999). Topramezone is also regis- 2013b). arranged in a randomized complete tered for POST weed control in corn Few selective weed control op- block (RCB) design with three repli- and turfgrass (e.g., Amvac, 2007; tions are available for mugwort con- cates. Mugwort control was assessed BASF, 2013). Apparent as foliar pho- trol, and it generally is not adequately visually at 7, 14, and 21 d after treat- tobleaching, topramezone reduces controlled with single applications or ment (DAT) using a 0% to 100% scale, total chlorophyll, b-carotene, lutein, reduced rates of POST herbicides where 0% represented no mugwort and other xanthophyll cycle pig- (Bradley and Hagood 2002a, 2002b). control and 100% represented com- ments in susceptible grassy and It follows that synergistic mixtures of plete mugwort necrosis. Following broadleaf weeds, including common reduced rates of HPPD and PSII in- a land manager decision to mow ex- bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), hibitors could optimize weed control perimental field plots in advance of hybrid bermudagrass (C. dactylon · and increase herbicide tolerance to right-of-way remediation efforts, field C. transvaalensis), and annual blue- turfgrass and ornamental crops (Cutulle trials were ended before regrowth data grass (Poa annua) (BASF, 2013; et al., 2013b). Therefore, objectives of could be taken. An alternative site with Brosnan et al., 2011; Elmore et al., this research were to evaluate low rates sufficient contiguous mugwort infesta- 2011, 2013). of the HPPD herbicide mesotrione and tion could not be found to repeat and In limited tests with ornamental to assess control efficacy of mesotrione extend the field trial component. plants, some HPPD herbicides have combined with known synergist like the GREENHOUSE EXPERIMENTS. provided acceptable ornamental tol- PSII inhibitor atrazine for enhanced Greenhouse experiments in Virginia erance at rates that provide some level activity on mugwort compared against were initiated in 2001 to evaluate of weed control (Armel et al., 2009; the standard clopyralid. The second mugwort control using previously Elmore et al., 2013; Little et al., 2004; objective was to quantify the ability field-tested rates of mesotrione (0.093, Senesac and Tsontakis-Bradley, 2007; of reduced rates of multiple HPPD- 0.125, and 0.187 lb/acre), and the Stamps and Chandler, 2009). In- inhibiting herbicides, either alone or lowest mesotrione rate plus a low creased POST control of some peren- paired with the PSII-inhibiting herbi- atrazine rate (0.250 lb/acre), with nial weed species was achieved when cides atrazine or bentazon, to provide efficacy evaluated against the clopyr- HPPD-inhibiting herbicides, like mes- commercially acceptable mugwort con- alid herbicide standard. Five 1-inch- otrione, were combined with other trol for ornamental plant producers, long mugwort rhizomes were planted herbicides, especially those that inhibit whethergrowingincontainerorfield into 4-inch square pots (TO Plastics, PSII inhibitors (Bradley et al., 2000; systems. Virginia Beach, VA) filled with com- Kaastra et al., 2008). For example, mercial potting mix (Pro-Mix BX; POST
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • July 6, 2020 OPP Docket Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington
    July 6, 2020 OPP Docket Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20460-000 Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0167 Re. Clopyralid, Case Number 7212 Dear Madam/Sir: These comments are submitted on behalf of Beyond Pesticides, Beyond Toxics, Center for Food Safety, Hawai’i Alliance for Progressive Action, Hawai'i SEED, LEAD for Pollinators, Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, Maryland Pesticide Education Network, Northeast Organic Farming Association—Massachusetts Chapter, Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides, People and Pollinators Action Network, Real Organic Project, Sierra Club, Toxic Free NC, Women’s Voices for the Earth. Founded in 1981 as a national, grassroots, membership organization that represents community-based organizations and a range of people seeking to bridge the interests of consumers, farmers and farmworkers, Beyond Pesticides advances improved protections from pesticides and alternative pest management strategies that reduce or eliminate a reliance on pesticides. Our membership and network span the 50 states and the world. EPA’s proposed interim decision (PID) on the weed killer clopyralid is inadequate to protect property, nontarget plants, and pollinators from exposure to the chemical. Clopyralid poses unreasonable adverse effects that cannot be remedied by EPA’s proposed fixes. It should not be reregistered. Clopyralid has a long history of causing environmental and property damage through drift, runoff, use of treated plant material (such as straw or grass clippings) for mulch or compost, contaminated irrigation water, and urine or manure from animals consuming treated vegetation. Clopyralid (3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) is an herbicide used to control broadleaf weeds on nonresidential lawns and turf, range, pastures, right-of ways and on several crops.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No
    SERA TR 02-43-13-03b Triclopyr - Revised Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessments Final Report Prepared for: USDA, Forest Service Forest Health Protection GSA Contract No. GS-10F-0082F USDA Forest Service BPA: WO-01-3187-0150 USDA Purchase Order No.: 43-1387-2-0245 Task No. 13 Submitted to: Dave Thomas, COTR Forest Health Protection Staff USDA Forest Service Rosslyn Plaza Building C, Room 7129C 1601 North Kent Street Arlington, VA 22209 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 5100 Highbridge St., 42C Fayetteville, New York 13066-0950 Telephone: (315) 637-9560 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com March 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................... iv LIST OF WORKSHEETS ...................................................... v LIST OF ATTACHMENTS .................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................... viii ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS .............................. ix COMMON UNIT CONVERSIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................... xi CONVERSION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTATION .................................... xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1-1 2. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ................................................ 2-1 2.1. OVERVIEW
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, CLOPYRALID MEA+2,4-D, 07/07/2008
    'f-;) 7 S-O - 'ta- \ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION u.s. EPA Reg, Nwnber: Date of Issuance: AGENCY Office of Pesticide Programs 42750-92 Registration Division (7505P) -- 7 JtJL 2DOB Ariel Rios, Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C, 20460 NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: Term of Issuance: _ Registration -X Reregistration Name of Pesticide Product: (under FIFRA, as amended) Clopyralid MEA+ 2,4- D Name and Address of Registrant (include ZIP Code): Albaugh, Inc. 121 NE 18th Street Ankeny, IA 50021 N o~e: C.h~nge,~itiIflb~ljllgl,~i:t1~1i~~J9~~~1?~!iUiC~,fJqnf.th~i.:~G~~t~4j#'qqHriet£i~riw,ii4;tl}is, :' ',' ,,',: " registratio"n ~4stl>e ,s~Drriittedto,aPQjl,~9:~pt~qby 'theRe,gi~ttatipn pivisi()i1 prior t9 ':tI~.~"Qn~~)*~eI , ,~:~~~~r:::~.~:;~~:1~~jJ:r~,2t.edf.~,~.&.~~lt;'~I~\~i,~tfl%~~~i;m)~t~~:;'~~/~~·?~~:,)~·¥'t·.'~~~i,~j~:~:i)~.:,;" ,.".;,' "' On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above named pesticide is hereby registered/reregistered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is in no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator, on his motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any name in connection with the registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use ifit has been covered by others. This product is reregistered in accordance with FIFRA sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn and Soybean Mode of Action Herbicide Chart
    By Premix Corn and Soybean This chart lists premix herbicides alphabetically by their trade names so you can identify the premix’s component herbicides and their respective site of action groups. Refer Herbicide Chart to the Mode of Action chart for more information. Component Repeated use of herbicides with the same Site of Premix Trade Active Action site of action can result in the development of Trade Name ® Name ® Ingredient Group* herbicide-resistant weed populations. Authority First ............... Spartan sulfentrazone 14 FirstRate cloransulam 2 Axiom ........................... Define flufenacet 15 This publication was designed for commercial printing, color shifts may occur on other printers and on-screeen. Sencor metribuzin 5 Basis . ........................... Resolve rimsulfuron 2 Harmony GT thifensulfuron 2 By Mode of Action (effect on plant growth) Bicep II Magnum .......... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 This chart groups herbicides by their modes of action to assist Bicep Lite II Magnum .... Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 AAtrex atrazine 5 you in selecting herbicides 1) to maintain greater diversity in Boundary ...................... Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 15 herbicide use and 2) to rotate among herbicides with different Sencor metribuzin 5 Breakfree ATZ ............... Breakfree acetochlor 15 sites of action to delay the development of herbicide resistance. atrazine atrazine 5 Breakfree ATZ Lite ........ Breakfree acetochlor 15 Number of atrazine atrazine 5 resistant weed Buctril + Atrazine ......... Buctril bromoxynil 6 atrazine atrazine 5 species in U.S. Bullet ............................ Micro-Tech alachlor 15 Site of Chemical Active atrazine atrazine 5 Action Product Examples Camix ........................... Callisto mesotrione 28 Group* Site of Action Family Ingredient (Trade Name ®) Dual II Magnum s-metolachlor 15 Lipid Canopy DF ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Clopyralid 7B.1
    Clopyralid 7b.1 CLOPYRALID M. Tu, C. Hurd, R. Robison & J.M. Randall Herbicide Basics Synopsis Clopyralid is an auxin-mimic type herbicide. It is more Chemical formula: 3,6- selective (kills a more limited range of plants) than some dichloro-pyridinecarboxylic other auxin-mimic herbicides like picloram, triclopyr, or acid 2,4-D. Like other auxin-mimics, it has little effect on grasses and other monocots, but also does little harm to Herbicide Family: members of the mustard family (Brassicaceae) and several Pyridine (Picolinic Acid) other groups of broad-leaved plants. Clopyralid controls Target weeds: annual and many annual and perennial broadleaf weeds, particularly of perennial broadleaf weeds, esp. the Asteraceae (sunflower family), Fabaceae (legume knapweeds, thistles, and other family), Solanaceae (nightshade family), Polygonaceae members of the sunflower, (knotweed family), and Violaceae (violet family). It is legume, and knotweed families chemically similar to picloram, but clopyralid has a shorter half-life, is more water-soluble, and has a lower adsorption Forms: salt & ester capacity than picloram. Clopyralid’s half-life in the Formulations: SL, WG environment averages one to two months and ranges up to one year. It is degraded almost entirely by microbial Mode of Action: Auxin mimic metabolism in soils and aquatic sediments. Clopyralid is not Water Solubility: 1,000 ppm degraded by sunlight or hydrolysis. The inability of clopyralid to bind with soils and its persistence implies that Adsorption potential: low clopyralid has the potential to be highly mobile and a Primary degradation mech: contamination threat to water resources and non-target plant Slow microbial metabolism species, although no extensive offsite movement has been documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Herbicides in House Dust and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2013) 23, 363–370 & 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/13 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exposure to herbicides in house dust and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia Catherine Metayer1, Joanne S. Colt2, Patricia A. Buffler1, Helen D. Reed3, Steve Selvin1, Vonda Crouse4 and Mary H. Ward2 We examine the association between exposure to herbicides and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dust samples were collected from homes of 269 ALL cases and 333 healthy controls (o8 years of age at diagnosis/reference date and residing in same home since diagnosis/reference date) in California, using a high-volume surface sampler or household vacuum bags. Amounts of agricultural or professional herbicides (alachlor, metolachlor, bromoxynil, bromoxynil octanoate, pebulate, butylate, prometryn, simazine, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin) and residential herbicides (cyanazine, trifluralin, 2-methyl-4- chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), mecoprop, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), chlorthal, and dicamba) were measured. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by logistic regression. Models included the herbicide of interest, age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, year and season of dust sampling, neighborhood type, and residence type. The risk of childhood ALL was associated with dust levels of chlorthal; compared to homes with no detections, ORs for the first, second, and third tertiles were 1.49 (95% CI: 0.82–2.72), 1.49 (95% CI: 0.83–2.67), and 1.57 (95% CI: 0.90–2.73), respectively (P-value for linear trend ¼ 0.05). The magnitude of this association appeared to be higher in the presence of alachlor.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program
    U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program Stream water-quality analytes Major ions and trace elements­schedule 998 (20 constituents) Pesticides ­­schedule 2437 (229 compounds) Alkalinity 1H­1,2,4­Triazole Arsenic 2,3,3­Trichloro­2­propene­1­sulfonic acid (TCPSA) Boron 2,4­D Calcium 2­(1­Hydroxyethyl)­6­methylaniline Chloride 2­[(2­Ethyl­6­methylphenyl)amino]­1­propanol Fluoride 2­Amino­N­isopropylbenzamide Iron 2­Aminobenzimidazole Lithium 2­Chloro­2',6'­diethylacetanilide 2­Chloro­4,6­diamino­s­triazine {CAAT} Magnesium (Didealkylatrazine) pH 2­Chloro­4­isopropylamino­6­amino­s­triazine Potassium 2­Chloro­6­ethylamino­4­amino­s­triazine {CEAT} Total dissolved solids 2­Chloro­N­(2­ethyl­6­methylphenyl)acetamide Selenium 2­Hydroxy­4­isopropylamino­6­amino­s­triazine 2­Hydroxy­4­isopropylamino­6­ethylamino­s­triazin Silica e {OIET} Sodium 2­Hydroxy­6­ethylamino­4­amino­s­triazine Specific conductance 2­Isopropyl­6­methyl­4­pyrimidinol Strontium 3,4­Dichlorophenylurea Sulfate 3­Hydroxycarbofuran Turbidity 3­Phenoxybenzoic acid Vanadium 4­(Hydroxymethyl)pendimethalin 4­Chlorobenzylmethyl sulfoxide Suspended sediment 4­Hydroxy molinate 4­Hydroxychlorothalonil Nutrients­schedule 2430 (18 constituents) 4­Hydroxyhexazinone A Inorganic carbon, suspended Acephate Dissolved inorganic carbon Acetochlor ammonia + organic nitrogen (unfiltered­Kjeldahl) Acetochlor oxanilic acid ammonia + organic nitrogen (filtered­Kjeldahl) Acetochlor sulfonic acid Ammonia as N, filtered Acetochlor sulfynilacetic acid nitrite, filtered Alachlor
    [Show full text]
  • Triclopyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Corrected Final Report
    SERA TR-052-25-03c Triclopyr Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Corrected Final Report Submitted to: Paul Mistretta, COR USDA/Forest Service, Southern Region 1720 Peachtree RD, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30309 USDA Forest Service Contract: AG-3187-C-06-0010 USDA Forest Order Number: AG-43ZP-D-09-0034 SERA Internal Task No. 52-25 Submitted by: Patrick R. Durkin Syracuse Environmental Research Associates, Inc. 8125 Solomon Seal Manlius, New York 13104 Fax: (315) 637-0445 E-Mail: [email protected] Home Page: www.sera-inc.com May 24, 2011 October 20, 2011 (Minor Correction) July 9, 2016 (Corrections) Error Notes October 20, 2011 In the original release of the final report (SERA TR-052-25-03a dated May 24, 2011), Tables 2 and 22 incorrectly listed the water solubility of TCP as 100 mg/L. As indicated in Table 1, the correct value, from Knuteson (1999), is 49,000 mg/L. This error was noted by Dr. K. King (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). The error has been corrected. While the Gleams-Driver runs were made using the 100 mg/L water solubility, re-runs using the water solubility of 49,000 mg/L yielded results that are indistinguishable from the original runs. Thus, the appendices have not been change. Water solubility is not a sensitive parameter in GLEAMS unless the soil water is saturated. This did not occur in the Gleams-Driver modeling. July 9, 2016 During an audit of WorksheetMaker (Version 6.00.15), it was noted that the chronic toxicity values of TCP to aquatic invertebrates had been entered incorrectly into the WorksheetMaker database and the aquatic toxicity values of TCP for algae had been omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • MC(' Potential Exposure of Humans to 2
    (MC( FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY 1:3 3 9-3 4 6 (1981) Potential Exposure of Humans to 2,4,5-T and TCDD in the Oregon Coast Ranges MICHAEL NEWTON" and LOGAN A. NORRISB "Professor of Forest Ecology, Oregon State University, Corvallis; BChief Research Chemist, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon ABSTRACT Potential Exposure of Humans to 2,4,5-T and TCDD in Humans may be exposed to herbicides through drift; inges- the Oregon Coast Ranges. Newton, M. and Norris, L.A. tion of wild and domestic meat, vegetables, and fruit; con- (1981). F.undam. AppL Toxicol. 1:339-346. Research on the sumption of water; and dermal contact while handling the use of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) contami- chemicals, equipment, and treated vegetation. The range of -8 nated with 2.5 X 10 parts 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p- potential exposure extends from zero, if there is no encounter dioxin (TCDD) in forests of the Oregon Coast Ranges per- with the herbicide, to the worst situation where the person has mits estimates of human exposures for both compounds. encountered the highest levels of water contamination, drift Estimated total exposure of nearby ( ^ 1/8 mile distant) resi- exposure, meat contamination, and dermal exposure simul- dents during the first week after application is 0.0039 mg/kg taneously. We have brought estimates of all sources together of 2,4,5-T for a 70-kg adult. Exposure to TCDD in the same to determine the possible range of total exposure from episode would be 1.9 X 10 b ° mg/kg.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]