DOCSLIB.ORG

SECOND NATIONAL REPORT Please Provide the Following Details on The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SECOND NATIONAL REPORT Please provide the following details on the origin of this report Contracting Party UKRAINE National Focal Point Full name of the institution: Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Name and title of contact Dr. Yaroslav Movchan, Head of the officer: Department of Land Resources Protection, Ecological Network and Biodiversity Conservation Mailing address: 5,Khreshchatyk street,01601 Kyiv, Ukraine Telephone: +380-44 206 31 53 Fax: +380-44 206 31 53 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Contact officer for national report (if different) Full name of the institution: Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Name and title of contact Nina Tudel; Yulia Bondarenko officer: Mailing address: 35,Uritskogo street, 03035 Kyiv, Ukraine Telephone: +380-44 206 31 47 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Full name of the institution: Interecocentre Name and title of contact Leonid Protsenko officer: Mailing address: Room 69,Tereshchenkivska str., 2, 01601, GSP, Kyiv-601, Ukraine Telephone: +380-44 235 73 74 Fax: +380-44 235 70 62 E-mail: [email protected] Submission Signature of officer responsible for submitting national report: Date of submission: 10 September 2003 1 Please provide summary information on the process by which this report has been prepared, including information on the types of stakeholders who have been actively involved in its preparation and on material which was used as a basis for the report The Second National Report on implementation of the provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has been prepared in a frame of the grant for the "Preparation of Biodiversity Phase II Enabling Activity Project” received by Ukraine from the GEF through the World Bank (2001-2003). The objective of the project was to assist Ukraine to assess capacity building needs, identify priorities, and build consensus with respect to meeting its obligations under the CBD. Clearing House Mechanism was also established within the frames of the Project. Collection of the necessary data and compilation of the preliminary draft report was fulfilled with the financial assistance of the Dutch side within the frames of the Joint Working Programme for Ukrainian –Netherlands Co-operation in the Field of Environment for the Period 2002-2004. Please provide information on any particular circumstances in your country that are relevant to understanding the answers to the questions in this report Transition from strictly centralized economy towards market-based one, processes of the transformation of political system in Ukraine influence significantly the biodiversity protection environment there. However, in spite of all the difficulties of transition period, the foundations of modern environmental policy have been practically established in Ukraine after its independence. The main principles of the state environmental policy are declared in the respective articles of the Constitution of Ukraine, a number of Ukrainian laws and program documents have been adopted since 1991. The Law of Ukraine “On the Protection of Environment”, which was adopted in 1991, laid the foundation for regulating issues in the sphere of environmental protection, environmental safety and sustainable use of natural resources. It has become a framework for the development of a series of legislative acts in this area. Ratification of CBD by Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) of Ukraine on 29th November, 1994 ensured further development of environmental conservational activities, promoted increasing of international co-operation, involvement of Ukraine in global environmental concerns and actions. National activities in biodiversity conservation are implemented in accordance with the existing national legal framework as well as the international conventions ratified by Ukraine and the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy (1995). The adoption of the Constitution of Ukraine on June 28, 1996 was an important step towards the improvement of environmental policy in the country. The Constitution proclaims the responsibility of the State to ensure environment safety and to maintain environment stability and equilibrium. The Strategy of Conservation of Ukraine’s Biological Diversity was approved in 1997. The main objectives of it are as follows: - Preservation, restoration and improvement of the state of natural, semi-natural and disturbed ecosystems, habitats of individual species and components of landscapes; - Promoting the transition to sustainable use of natural resources; - Keeping the population ever more informed on the issues of biological diversity, as well as involving an ever greater number of people in the activity relating to the conservation of biodiversity; - Enhancing the responsibility for preservation of biodiversity of enterprises, organizations and establishments whose activity are linked with the utilization of natural resources and affect the environment. The development of the relevant political and legal base for successful implementation of CBD has been elaborated in many aspects. Necessary strategic documents and legal acts have been developed to reach the main goals of the Convention. Biodiversity conservation became one of the nationwide priorities for the 2 governmental nature protection policy, which is reflected in the Ukrainian environmental law system. In elaboration of applicable legislation a number of new legal acts and documents governing social and economic relations within protection, utilization and restoration of wild nature were developed and adopted by the Verkhovna Rada: The Programme for Further Development of the Protected Areas in Ukraine (1994), The National Programme for the Environmental Rehabilitation of the Dnipro River Basin and the Improvement of the Quality of Drinking Water (1996), the laws “On the Animal Kingdom” (1993, 2001), “On the Plant Kingdom” (1999), “On the State Programme of Ukraine’s National Environmental Network Development for Years 2000-2015” (2000), “ On the Adoption of the State Programme of the Protection and Rehabilitation of the Azov-Black Seas Environment” (2001), “On the Red Book of Ukraine” (2002). Implementation of the last one will ensure the preservation and restoration of the biodiversity and national landscape diversity as well contributes essentially to developing the Pan-European Environmental Network. Law “On Accession to Cartagena Protocol” was ratified by the Verkhovna Rada (2002). Another important draft law “National Programme for Preservation of Biodiversity Conservation is under the development now and is to be submitted to the Verkhovna Rada. The draft National Action Plan on Biodiversity for 2002-2015 was developed to implement the Strategy. Please indicate, by marking an "x" in the appropriate column below, the level of priority your country accords to the implementation of various articles, provisions and their associated decisions, and relevant programmes of the work of the Convention. Articles/Provisions Level of Priorities /Programme of Work High Medium Low Article 5 - X Cooperation Article 6 - General X measures for conservation and sustainable use Article 7 - X Identification and monitoring Article 8 - In situ X conservation Article 8h - Alien X species Article 8j - X Traditional knowledge and related provisions Article 9 - Ex situ X conservation Article 10 - X Sustainable use of components of biological diversity Article 11 - X Incentive measures Article 12 - X Research and training 3 Article 13 - Public X education and awareness Article 14 - Impact X assessment and minimizing adverse impacts Article 15 - Access X to genetic resources Article 16 - Access X to and transfer of technology Article 17 - X Exchange of information Article 18 - X Scientific and technical cooperation Article 19 - X Handling of biotechnology and distribution of its benefits Article 20 - X Financial resources Article 21 - X Financial mechanism Agricultural X biodiversity Forest biodiversity X Inland water X biodiversity Marine and coastal X biodiversity Dryland and subhumid X land biodiversity 4 Please indicate, by marking an "x" in the appropriate column below, the availability of resources required by your country for the implementation of various articles, provisions and their associated decisions, and relevant programmes of work of the Convention. Articles/Provisions/ Resources Availability Programme of Work Good Adequate Limiting Severely Limiting Article 5 - X Cooperation Article 6 -General X measures for conservation and sustainable use Article 7 - X Identification and monitoring Article 8 - In situ X conservation Article 8h - Alien X species Article 8j - X Traditional knowledge and related provisions Article 9 - Ex situ X conservation Article 10 - X Sustainable use of components of biological diversity Article 11 - Incentive X measures Article 12 - Research X and training Article 13 - Public X education and awareness Article 14 - Impact X assessment and minimizing adverse impacts Article 15 - Access to X genetic resources Article 16 - Access to X and transfer of technology Article 17 - Exchange X of information Article 18 - X Scientific and technical cooperation Article 19 - Handling X of biotechnology and 5 distribution of its benefits Article 20 - Financial X resources Article 21 - Financial X mechanism Agricultural X biodiversity Forest biodiversity X Inland water X biodiversity Marine and coastal X biodiversity Dryland and subhumid X land biodiversity The COP has established programmes of
Recommended publications
  • Open Letter of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

    Open Letter of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

    We would highly appreciate if you correctly attribute to Ukraine the publications produced by scientists based in Sevastopol, Simferopol, Kerch, Yalta, Nikita, Feodosia, Nauchny, Simeiz, Yevpatoria, Saki, and other cities and towns of the Crimean region, Donetsk, and Luhansk, in particular the Crimean Laser Observatory of the Main Astronomical Observatory, the Marine Institute of Hydrophysics, the Crimean Nature Reserve, the Karadag Nature Reserve, the O.O.Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, the Donetsk O.O.Galkin Institute of Physics and Engineering, and others. We insist on appropriate attributions of Crimean and Donbas research institutions to Ukraine in any publications, especially in international journals. In those cases when items with inappropriate country affiliation have been already published due to neglect or for some other reason, we request the soonest possible publication of corrigenda or editorial notes, explaining the temporary occupied status of the Crimea and the Donbas. In those cases when Crimean or Donbas authors, for fear of repressions, provide for communication reasons their current addresses as Russia or Russian Federation, the editorial disclaimer has to be made indicating the real status of Crimea and Donbas as a constituent and integral part of Ukraine, with proper reference to the relevant international documents adopted by the UN and/or other bodies. An example of such a disclaimer could be as follows: “The author(s) from the Crimea / Donbas of the article(s) appearing in this Journal is/are solely responsible for the indication of his/her/their actual postal address(es) and country affiliation(s). However, the Journal states that the country affiliation(s) indicated in the article is/are improper.
  • Verzeichnis Der Europäischen Zoos Arten-, Natur- Und Tierschutzorganisationen

    Verzeichnis Der Europäischen Zoos Arten-, Natur- Und Tierschutzorganisationen

    uantum Q Verzeichnis 2021 Verzeichnis der europäischen Zoos Arten-, Natur- und Tierschutzorganisationen Directory of European zoos and conservation orientated organisations ISBN: 978-3-86523-283-0 in Zusammenarbeit mit: Verband der Zoologischen Gärten e.V. Deutsche Tierpark-Gesellschaft e.V. Deutscher Wildgehege-Verband e.V. zooschweiz zoosuisse Schüling Verlag Falkenhorst 2 – 48155 Münster – Germany [email protected] www.tiergarten.com/quantum 1 DAN-INJECT Smith GmbH Special Vet. Instruments · Spezial Vet. Geräte Celler Str. 2 · 29664 Walsrode Telefon: 05161 4813192 Telefax: 05161 74574 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.daninject-smith.de Verkauf, Beratung und Service für Ferninjektionsgeräte und Zubehör & I N T E R Z O O Service + Logistik GmbH Tranquilizing Equipment Zootiertransporte (Straße, Luft und See), KistenbauBeratung, entsprechend Verkauf undden Service internationalen für Ferninjektionsgeräte und Zubehör Vorschriften, Unterstützung bei der Beschaffung der erforderlichenZootiertransporte Dokumente, (Straße, Vermittlung Luft und von See), Tieren Kistenbau entsprechend den internationalen Vorschriften, Unterstützung bei der Beschaffung der Celler Str.erforderlichen 2, 29664 Walsrode Dokumente, Vermittlung von Tieren Tel.: 05161 – 4813192 Fax: 05161 74574 E-Mail: [email protected] Str. 2, 29664 Walsrode www.interzoo.deTel.: 05161 – 4813192 Fax: 05161 – 74574 2 e-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] http://www.interzoo.de http://www.daninject-smith.de Vorwort Früheren Auflagen des Quantum Verzeichnis lag eine CD-Rom mit der Druckdatei im PDF-Format bei, welche sich großer Beliebtheit erfreute. Nicht zuletzt aus ökologischen Gründen verzichten wir zukünftig auf eine CD-Rom. Stattdessen kann das Quantum Verzeichnis in digitaler Form über unseren Webshop (www.buchkurier.de) kostenlos heruntergeladen werden. Die Datei darf gerne kopiert und weitergegeben werden.
  • National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Uruguay, 2015 Please submit the completed National Report in Microsoft Word format (.doc, 97-2003), as an electronic file (not a printed copy) and preferably by e-mail, to Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) by 1 September 2014. National Report Format for Ramsar COP12, page 2 The structure of the COP12 National Report Format The COP12 National Report Format (NRF) is in four sections: Section 1 provides the institutional information about the Administrative Authority and National Focal Points for the national implementation of the Convention. Section 2 is a ‘free-text’ section in which the Party is invited to provide a summary of various aspects of national implementation progress and recommendations for the future. Section 3 provides the 66 implementation indicator questions, grouped under each Convention implementation strategy in the Strategic Plan 2009-2015, and with an optional ‘free-text’ section under each indicator question in which the Contracting Party may, if it wishes, add further information on national implementation of that activity. Section 4 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that so wishes to provide additional information regarding any or all of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites). General guidance for completing and submitting the COP12 National Report Format IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ THIS GUIDANCE SECTION BEFORE STARTING TO COMPLETE THE NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT 1. All Sections of the COP12 NRF should be completed in one of the Convention’s official languages (English, French, Spanish).
  • Bird Numbers 2019

    Bird Numbers 2019

    Bird Numbers 2019 Counting birds counts Book of Abstracts © Joaquim Antunes st 21 Conference of the European Bird Census Council ISBN: 978-989-8550-85-9 This page was intentionally left in blank Imprint Editors João E. Rabaça, Carlos Godinho, Inês Roque LabOr-Laboratory of Ornithology, ICAAM, University of Évora Scientific Committee Aleksi Lehikoinen (chair), Ruud Foppen, Lluís Brotons, Mark Eaton, Henning Heldbjerg, João E. Rabaça, Carlos Godinho, Rui Lourenço, Oskars Keišs, Verena Keller Organising Committee João E. Rabaça, Carlos Godinho, Inês Roque, Rui Lourenço, Pedro Pereira, Ruud Foppen, Aleksi Lehikoinen Volunteer team André Oliveira, Cláudia Lopes, Inês Guise, Patrícia Santos, Pedro Freitas, Pedro Ribeiro, Rui Silva, Sara Ornelas, Shirley van der Horst Recommended citation Rabaça, J.E., Roque, I., Lourenço, R. & Godinho, C. (Eds.) 2019: Bird Numbers 2019: counting birds counts. Book of Abstracts of the 21st Conference of the European Bird Census Council. University of Évora, Évora. ISBN: 978-989-8550-85-9 Bird Numbers 2019: counting birds counts The logo of the Conference pictures two species with different stories: the Woodchat Shrike Lanius senator and the Dartford Warbler Sylvia undata, both occurring in Alentejo. The first is a LC species currently suffering a moderate decline in Spain and Portugal; the second is a resident bird classified as NT which is declining in Europe at a moderate rate and seemingly increasing in Portugal, a country that holds 25% of its European population. Bird Numbers 2019 Counting birds counts
  • Romania: Danube Delta Integrated Sustainable Development Strategy

    Romania: Danube Delta Integrated Sustainable Development Strategy

    Romania: Danube Delta Integrated Sustainable Development Strategy About the Danube Delta Region The Danube Delta is one of the continent’s most valuable habitats for specific delta wildlife and biodiversity. Established as a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve and a Ramsar site in 1990, it is the Europe’s second largest delta, and the best preserved of European deltas. The most significant physical and ecological feature of the Danube Delta is its vast expanse of wetlands, including freshwater marsh, lakes and ponds, streams and channels. With an area of 3,446 km2, is the world’s largest wetland. Only 9% of the area is permanently above water. The Delta hosts extraordinary biodiversity and provides important environmental services. It is the home of over 1,200 varieties of plants, 300 species of birds, as well as 45 freshwater fish species in its numerous lakes and marshes. There are 16 strictly protected areas in the delta where no economic activities are allowed, and areas for ecological rehabilitation and buffer zones between economical areas where tourist activities are permitted as long as the environment is protected. Dual Challenge in Developing the Danube Delta A dual challenge for the sustainable development of the Danube Delta is the conservation of its ecological assets and improvement of the quality of life for its residents. The Danube Delta is the largest remaining natural delta in Europe and one of the largest in the world. It is also the only river that is entirely contained within a Biosphere Reserve. It is important to conserve all of its ecological assets. 1 Danube Delta is perhaps one of the least inhabited regions of temperate Europe, with only about 10,000 people in one town (Sulina) and about 20 scattered villages.
  • Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999

    Evaluation of Wetlands and Floodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin Final Report May 1999

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME EVALUATION OF WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN FINAL REPORT MAY 1999 Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance prepared by WWF Danube-Carpathian-Programme and WWF-Auen-Institut (Germany) Preface The "Evaluation of Wetlands and Flkoodplain Areas in the Danube River Basin" study was prepared in the frame of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP). The Study has been undertaken to define priority wetland and floodplain rehabilitation sites as a component of the Pollution reduction Programme. The present report addresses the identification of former floodplains and wetlands in the Danube River Basin, as well as the description of the current status and evaluation of the ecological importance of the potential for rehabilitation. Based on this evaluation, 17 wetland/floodplain sites have been identified for rehabilitation considering their ecological importance, their nutrient removal capacity and their role in flood protection. Most of the identified wetlands will require transboundary cooperation and represent an important first step in retoring the ecological balance in the Danube River Basin. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps that can be found in Annex I of the study. The study was prepared by the WWF-Danube-Carpathian-Programme and the WWF-Auen-Institut (Institute for Floodplains Ecology, WWF-Germany), under the guidance of the UNDP/GEF team of experts of the Danube Programme Coordination Unit (DPCU) in Vienna, Austria.
  • Sedimentary Microplastic Concentrations from the Romanian

    Sedimentary Microplastic Concentrations from the Romanian

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Sedimentary microplastic concentrations from the Romanian Danube River to the Black Sea Iulian Pojar1, Adrian Stănică1*, Friederike Stock2, Christian Kochleus2, Michael Schultz1 & Chris Bradley3 A multitude of recent studies have detailed microplastic concentrations in aquatic and terrestrial environments, although questions remain over their ultimate fate. At present, few studies have detailed microplastic characteristics and abundance along a freshwater–marine interface, and considerable uncertainties remain over the modelled contribution of terrestrial and riverine microplastic to the world’s oceans. In this article, for the frst time, we detail sedimentary microplastic concentrations along a River–Sea transect from the lower reaches of a major continental river, the River Danube, through the Danube Delta, the Black Sea coast to the Romanian and Bulgarian inner shelf of the Black Sea. Our results indicate that isolated areas of the Danube Delta are still relatively pristine, with few microplastic particles in some of the sediments sampled. A multitude of recent studies have detailed microplastic concentrations in aquatic and terrestrial environments, although questions remain over their ultimate fate. At present, few studies have detailed microplastic charac- teristics and abundance along a freshwater–marine interface, and considerable uncertainties remain over the modelled contribution of terrestrial and riverine microplastic to the world’s oceans. In this article, for the frst time, we detail sedimentary microplastic concentrations along a River–Sea transect from the lower reaches of a major continental river, the River Danube, through the Danube Delta, the Black Sea coast to the Romanian and Bulgarian inner shelf of the Black Sea. Our results indicate that isolated areas of the Danube Delta are still relatively pristine, with few microplastic particles in some of the sediments sampled.
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine

    Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine

    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
  • Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands

    Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands

    Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands Kyiv–2003 Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands: Revised and updated. — Kyiv: Wetlands International, 2003. — 235 pp., 81 maps. — ISBN 90 5882 9618 Published by the Black Sea Program of Wetlands International PO Box 82, Kiev-32, 01032, Ukraine E-mail: [email protected] Editor: Gennadiy Marushevsky Editing of English text: Rosie Ounsted Lay-out: Victor Melnychuk Photos on cover: Valeriy Siokhin, Vasiliy Kostyushin The presentation of material in this report and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expres- sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Wetlands International concerning the legal status of any coun- try, area or territory, or concerning the delimitation of its boundaries or frontiers. The publication is supported by Wetlands International through a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries of the Netherlands and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands (MATRA Fund/Programme International Nature Management) ISBN 90 5882 9618 Copyright © 2003 Wetlands International, Kyiv, Ukraine All rights reserved CONTENTS CONTENTS3 6 7 13 14 15 16 22 22 24 26 28 30 32 35 37 40 43 45 46 54 54 56 58 58 59 61 62 64 64 66 67 68 70 71 76 80 80 82 84 85 86 86 86 89 90 90 91 91 93 Contents 3 94 99 99 100 101 103 104 106 107 109 111 113 114 119 119 126 130 132 135 139 142 148 149 152 153 155 157 157 158 160 162 164 164 165 170 170 172 173 175 177 179 180 182 184 186 188 191 193 196 198 199 201 202 4 Directory of Azov-Black Sea Coastal Wetlands 203 204 207 208 209 210 212 214 214 216 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 230 232 233 Contents 5 EDITORIAL AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Directory is based on the national reports prepared for the Wetlands International project ‘The Importance of Black Sea Coastal Wetlands in Particular for Migratory Waterbirds’, sponsored by the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries.
  • Socio – Economic Analysis of the Programme Area

    Socio – Economic Analysis of the Programme Area

    Socio – economic analysis of the programme area INTERREG NEXT POLAND – BELARUS – UKRAINE 2021 -2027 1 | Table of Contents 1. Summary .............................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................7 Diagnosis of the support area ....................................................................................................8 3.1. General information on the support area .......................................................................8 3.2. Population ............................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1. Density of population ................................................................................................. 13 3.2.2. Population growth ....................................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Population structure .................................................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Changes in population ............................................................................................... 17 3.2.5 Migration ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.6 Demographic trends ...................................................................................................
  • Educational Materials for YPEF 2019

    Educational Materials for YPEF 2019

    Young People in European Forests YPEF European contest about forests and forestry Educational material Ninth edition, 2019 1 Contents European Forests ..................................................................................................................... 3 Forests and forestry of Austria ................................................................................................................................... 25 Czech Republic ....................................................................................................................... 27 Estonia ................................................................................................................................... 30 Germany ................................................................................................................................ 37 Greece ................................................................................................................................... 43 Hungary ................................................................................................................................. 48 Latvia ..................................................................................................................................... 56 Lithuania ................................................................................................................................ 59 Poland ...................................................................................................................................
  • 0Db570ad569a08f8f6772559dcb

    0Db570ad569a08f8f6772559dcb

    ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВО МОСКВЫ ДЕПАРТАМЕНТ КУЛЬТУРЫ ГОРОДА МОСКВЫ GOVERNMENT OF MOSCOW MOSCOW DEPARTMENT OF CULTURE ЕВРОАЗИАТСКАЯ РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ АССОЦИАЦИЯ ЗООПАРКОВ И АКВАРИУМОВ EURASIAN REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS МОСКОВСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ЗООЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ПАРК MOSCOW ZOO ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЙ СБОРНИК ЕВРОАЗИАТСКОЙ РЕГИОНАЛЬНОЙ АССОЦИАЦИИ ЗООПАРКОВ И АКВАРИУМОВ INFORMATIONAL ISSUE OF EURASIAN REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIUMS ISSUE 33 VLUME II МОСКВА 2014 2 OVERNMENT OF MOSCOW COMMITTEE FOR CULTURE EURASIAN REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS & AQUARIUMS MOSCOW ZOO INFORMATIONAL ISSUE OF EURASIAN REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AQUARIUMS ISSUE № 33 VOLUME II ________________ MOSCOW – 2014 – 3 The current issue comprises information on EARAZA member zoos and other zoological institutions. The first part of the publication includes collection inventories and data on breeding in all zoological collections. The second part of the issue contains information on the meetings, workshops, trips and conferences which were held both in our country and abroad, as well as reports on the EARAZA activities. Chief executive editor Vladimir Spitsin President of Moscow Zoo Compiling Editors: Т. Andreeva V. Frolov N. Karpov L. Kuzmina V. Ostapenko V. Sheveleva T. Vershinina Translators: A. Simonova © 2014 Moscow Zoo 4 Eurasian Regional Association of Zoos and Aquariums (EARAZA) 123242 Russia, Moscow, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya 1. Telephone/fax: (499) 255-63-64 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Web: www.earaza.ru EARAZA Chairman: Vladimir V. Spitsin President of Moscow Zoo, Correspondent Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Members of the presidium: Vladimir V. Fainstein Deputy Director for Zoovet of Tallinn Zoo Alexander P. Barannikov Director of Rostov Zoo Aleksei P. Khanzazuk Director of Kishinev Zoo Premysl Rabas Director Zoo Dvur Kralove nad Labem Vladimir N.