Polynesian Rats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polynesian Rats View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Wildlife Damage for July 1994 Polynesian Rats Mark E. Tobin USDA-APHIS-ADC, Hilo, Hawaii Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Tobin, Mark E., "Polynesian Rats" (1994). The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage. 7. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmhandbook/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Mark E. Tobin Project Leader Hawaii Field Station POLYNESIAN RATS Denver Wildlife Research Center USDA-APHIS-ADC Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Fig. 1. Polynesian rat, Rattus exulans Damage Prevention and Toxicants Identification Control Methods Zinc phosphide. The Polynesian rat (Rattus exulans) is Exclusion Fumigants smaller than either the Norway rat (R. norvegicus) or the roof rat (R. rattus). Not practical for Hawaiian sugarcane Not practical in and around sugarcane Polynesian rats have slender bodies, fields. fields. pointed snouts, large ears, and rela- Cultural Methods Trapping tively small, delicate feet. A ruddy brown back contrasts with a whitish Not practical in and around sugarcane Synchronize planting and harvesting belly. Mature individuals are 4.5 to 6 fields. of large blocks of fields. inches long (11.5 to 15.0 cm) from the Eliminate or modify noncrop vegeta- Shooting tip of the nose to the base of the tail and weigh 1.5 to 3 ounces (40 to 80 g). tion adjacent to sugarcane fields. Not practical. The tail has prominent fine scaly rings Develop potential resistant sugarcane Biological Control and is about the same length as the varieties. head and body. Female Polynesian rats Not effective. Repellents have 8 nipples, compared to 10 and 12 nipples normally found on roof rats None are registered. and Norway rats, respectively. PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE — 1994 Cooperative Extension Division Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Nebraska - Lincoln United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Damage Control B-121 Great Plains Agricultural Council Wildlife Committee Range General Biology, home ranges of both sexes decrease as Reproduction, and the sugarcane matures. Individuals Polynesian rats are native to Southeast typically stray less than 100 to 165 feet Asia but have dispersed with humans Behavior (30 to 50 m) from their burrows. across the central and western Pacific. Today, these rodents inhabit almost Reproduction varies among geo- Population Changes o graphic areas and is influenced by every Pacific island within 30 of the Roof rats, Norway rats, and weather, availability of food, and other equator. They occur from the Asiatic Polynesian rats coexist throughout factors. Reproductive activity of Poly- mainland south to New Guinea and much of the Pacific basin. It is not nesian rats on Oahu reaches a peak in New Zealand, and east to the known how much, if any, interspecific late summer and ceases in mid to late Hawaiian Islands and Easter Island. competition exists. After the arrival of winter. Polynesian rats on Kure Atoll Polynesian rats accompanied early Norway rats, roof rats, and house mice in northwestern Hawaii produce most Polynesian immigrants to Hawaii and (Mus musculus) in New Zealand, popu- litters from May through August. On today occur on every major island of lations of Polynesian rats declined. the windward side of the island of Ha- the archipelago. The Polynesian rat is Today, they are very rare on the two waii, Polynesian rats breed throughout not present in the mainland United main islands. It is not clear whether a the year, with peak reproduction States. similar decline occurred in Hawaii, but occurring in the summer and early fall. if so, Polynesian rats have adjusted. Habitat Females have an average of 4 litters Today, they are the most abundant per year, with a range of 3 to 6 and an lowland rat in many parts of the state. In Hawaii, Polynesian rats are most average of 4 young per litter. The mini- common below 2,500 feet (750 m) mum gestation period for captive rats In Hawaii, roof rats, Norway rats, and elevation, although individuals have is 23 days, with lactation prolonging Polynesian rats often occur in the same been captured at an elevation of 4,900 gestation by 3 to 7 days. In captivity, sugarcane fields. Only the latter two feet (1,500 m) on Mauna Loa on the newborns open their eyes about 2 are major pests in sugarcane, with roof island of Hawaii and 9,700 feet (2,950 weeks after birth and are weaned rats occurring mostly near field edges. m) on the rim of Haleakala Crater on when about 3 weeks old. Captive-bred Since the late 1960s Norway rats have Maui. Polynesian rats prefer areas individuals reach reproductive matu- increased their abundance relative to with good ground cover on well- rity when they are 60 to 70 days old the other two species in Hawaiian sug- drained soil. Throughout much of their and weigh about 1.5 ounces (40 g). The arcane fields and are now the species range, Polynesian rats live in close life expectancy of wild rats is less than of primary concern to the Hawaiian association with humans. In Hawaii, 1 year. sugarcane industry. Polynesian rats, however, Polynesian rats are not a however, are still locally abundant in commensal pest, but rather favor wild Hawaii is one of the few areas in the many fields. lowland habitats such as wooded and world where sugarcane is grown as a grassy gulches, fields, and waste areas. 2- to 3-year crop. Most rats living in They reach their highest densities on cane fields either die or migrate to sur- Damage and Damage agricultural lands such as sugarcane rounding areas during harvest, and Identification fields and abandoned pineapple fields. populations do not rebuild until the second half of the crop cycle. During Polynesian rats are a major agricul- Food Habits much of the first year, the sugarcane tural pest throughout Southeast Asia stalks stand erect, the crop canopy is and the Pacific region. Crops damaged Polynesian rats eat a wide variety of open, and most fields have little by this species include rice, maize, sug- foods, including broadleaf plants, ground cover. Some rats from adjacent arcane, coconut, cacao, pineapple, and grasses, fruits, seeds, and animal mat- waste areas forage along the periphery root crops. In the United States, sugar- ter. They prefer fleshy fruits such as of young sugarcane fields, but few cane is the only crop of economic con- melastoma (Melastoma malabathricum), venture into the interior until the sug- cern damaged by Polynesian rats. The passion fruit (Passiflora spp.), guava arcane is 8 to 12 months of age. At this most severe damage is to unirrigated (Psidium spp.), thimbleberry (Rubus time the sugarcane stalks fall over and sugarcane on the windward side of the rosaefolius), and popolo (Solanum dead leaves accumulate. The resulting islands of Hawaii and Kauai. Here, nodiflorum). In sugarcane fields, sugar- thatch layer is rich in invertebrate food rats find excellent habitat in the lush cane comprises about 70% of their diet and provides protective cover in fields vegetation of noncrop lands adjacent by volume, while in surrounding where rats establish dens. to sugarcane fields. noncrop gulches, it comprises about 20% to 50%. Rats cannot subsist on Movements and home ranges in sugar- Rat damage to Hawaiian sugarcane is sugarcane alone. They need additional cane fields vary depending on popula- negligible until the crop is 14 to 15 protein, such as earthworms, spiders, tion density, crop age, and other months old, after which it increases amphipods, insects, and eggs and factors. Polynesian rats are nocturnal substantially and progressively until young of ground-nesting birds. and are relatively sedentary. Males harvest. Damage caused by roof rats, travel farther than females, but the Norway rats, and Polynesian rats is B-122 very similar. All three species chew on the internodes of growing stalks. In- jury ranges from barely perceptible nicks in the outer rind to neatly chis- eled canoe-shaped cavities. Small chips usually are evident on the ground where rats have fed. Rat depredation can be distinguished easily from that of feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Pigs chew on the entire stalk, leaving it with a shred- ded appearance. Trampled vegetation is further evidence of pig activity. Legal Status Rats are an exotic species in Hawaii and are not protected by law. They may be controlled by any method con- sistent with state and federal laws and regulations. Damage Prevention and Control Methods Exclusion Electric fences and physical barriers have been used to prevent rats from entering experimental farm plots. It is questionable, however, whether cur- rent fencing designs and exclusion techniques are practical for Hawaiian sugarcane fields. Cultural Methods Advancing harvest from the usual 22- to 24-month schedule would reduce losses. Adoption of a shorter crop Fig. 2. Rat-damaged sugarcane cycle, however, would increase plant- ing and harvesting costs and probably include rind hardness, stalk diameter, and least effective against Norway would not be feasible considering cur- degree and time of lodging, resistance rats. Because the relative abundances rent economic conditions. Synchro- to souring, and potential for compen- of the two species vary substantially nized planting and harvesting of satory growth. from field to field and may shift as the adjacent fields might reduce move- crop matures, the efficacy of zinc phos- ments of rats from recently harvested Repellents phide baits also varies.
Recommended publications
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 182 the Murine Rodents
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 182 THE MURINE RODENTS RATTUS RATTUS, EXULANS, AND NORVEGICUS AS AVIAN PREDATORS by F. I. Norman Issued by THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Washington, D.C., U.S.A. January 15,1975 Contents Page Introduction 1 References to Predation by Rats 3 Apterygiformes 3 Procellariiformes 3 Pelicaniformes 4 Ciconiiformes 4 Ans eriformes Gallif ormes Charadriiformes Columbiformes Psittaciformes Passeriformes lliscussion References THE MURINE RODENTS RATTUS RATTUS, EXULANS, AND NORVEGICUS AS AVIAN PREDATORS by F. I. Norman-1 / INTRODUCTION Few mammals have adventitiously accompanied man around the world more than members of the Murinae and of these, the most ubiquitous must surely be the --Rattus group. Three species, R. rattus Linn., R. norvegicus Berkenhout, and R. exulans T~eale),have been h~storically associated with-man, and their present distribution reflects such associations. Thus although -R. exulans is generally distributed through the Pacific region, -R. rattus and norvegicus are almost worldwide in distribution, having originated presumably in Asia Minor, as did exulans (walker 1964.). All have invaded, with man's assistance, habitats which previously did not include them, and they have developed varying degrees of commensalism with man. Neither --rattus nor norvegicus has entered antarctic ecosystems, but Law and Burstall (1956) recorded their presence on subantarctic Macquarie Island. Kenyon (1961) and Schiller (1956), however, have shown that norvegicus has become established in the arctic where localised populations are dependent on refuse as a food source during the winter. More frequently, reports bave been made of the over-running of islands by these alien rats. Tristan da Cunha is one such example (Elliott 1957; Holdgate 1960), and Dampier found rattus to be common on Ascension Island in 1701 though presently -norvegicus is more widespread there (nuffey 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Black
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group BLACK RAT Rattus rattus Family: MURIDAE Order: RODENTIA Class: MAMMALIA M140 Written by: P. Brylski Reviewed by: H. Shellhammer Edited by: R. Duke DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The black rat was introduced to North America in the 1800's. Its distribution in California is poorly known, but it probably occurs in most urban areas. There are 2 subspecies present in California, R. r. rattus and R. r. alexandrinus. R. r. rattus, commonly called the black rat, lives in seaports and adjacent towns. It is frequently found along streamcourses away from buildings (Ingles 1947). R. r. alexandrinus, more commonly known as the roof rat, lives along the coast, in the interior valleys and in the lower parts of the Sierra Nevada. The distribution of both subspecies in rural areas is patchy. Occurs throughout the Central Valley and west to the San Francisco Bay area, coastal southern California, in Bakersfield (Kern Co.), and in the North Coast area from the vicinity of Eureka to the Oregon border. Confirmed locality information is lacking. Found in buildings, preferring attics, rafters, walls, and enclosed spaces (Godin 1977), and along streamcourses (Ingles 1965). Common in urban habitats. May occur in valley foothill riparian habitat at lower elevations. In northern California, occurs in dense himalayaberry thickets (Dutson 1973). SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Omnivorous, eating fruits, grains, small terrestrial vertebrates, fish, invertebrates, and human garbage. Cover: Prefers buildings and nearby stream courses. Where the black rat occurs with the Norway rat, it usually is forced to occupy the upper parts of buildings (Godin 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Characterization of Common Murine Rodents from Manipur, Northeast India
    Genes Genet. Syst. (2015) 90, p. 21–30 Molecular phylogenetic characterization of common murine rodents from Manipur, Northeast India Dhananjoy S. Chingangbam1, Joykumar M. Laishram1 and Hitoshi Suzuki2* 1Plant Breeding and Genetics Department, Central Agricultural University, Iroishemba, Imphal, Manipur 795004, India 2Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, North 10, West 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan (Received 11 July 2014, accepted 8 February 2015) The Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia are hotspots of murine biodiver- sity, but no species from the Arakan Mountain system that demarcates the border between the two areas has been subjected to molecular phylogenetic analyses. We examined the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences in six murine species (the Rattus rattus species complex, R. norvegicus, R. nitidus, Berylmys manipulus, Niviventer sp. and Mus musculus) from Manipur, which is located at the western foot of the mountain range. The sequences of B. manipulus and Niviventer sp. examined here were distinct from available congeneric sequences in the databases, with sequence divergences of 10–15%. Substantial degrees of intrapopulation divergence were detected in R. nitidus and the R. rattus species complex from Manipur, implying ancient habitation of the species in this region, while the recent introduction by modern and prehistoric human activities was suggested for R. norvegicus and M. musculus, respectively. In the nuclear gene Mc1r, also analyzed here, the R. rattus species complex from Manipur was shown to possess allelic sequences related to those from the Indian subcontinent in addition to those from East Asia. These results not only fill gaps in the phylo- genetic knowledge of each taxon examined but also provide valuable insight to bet- ter understand the biogeographic importance of the Arakan Mountain system in generating the species and genetic diversity of murine rodents.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Sections As Applicable
    This form should be used for all taxonomic proposals. Please complete all those modules that are applicable (and then delete the unwanted sections). For guidance, see the notes written in blue and the separate document “Help with completing a taxonomic proposal” Please try to keep related proposals within a single document; you can copy the modules to create more than one genus within a new family, for example. MODULE 1: TITLE, AUTHORS, etc (to be completed by ICTV Code assigned: 2016.014aM officers) Short title: One (1) new species in the genus Mammarenavirus (e.g. 6 new species in the genus Zetavirus) Modules attached 2 3 4 5 (modules 1 and 11 are required) 6 7 8 9 10 Author(s): Kim Blasdell, [email protected] Veasna Duong, [email protected] Marc Eloit, [email protected] Fabrice Chretien, [email protected] Sowath Ly, [email protected] Vibol Hul, [email protected] Vincent Deubel, [email protected] Serge Morand, [email protected] Philippe Buchy, [email protected] / [email protected] Corresponding author with e-mail address: Philippe Buchy, [email protected] / [email protected] List the ICTV study group(s) that have seen this proposal: A list of study groups and contacts is provided at http://www.ictvonline.org/subcommittees.asp . If in doubt, contact the appropriate subcommittee ICTV Arenaviridae Study Group chair (fungal, invertebrate, plant, prokaryote or vertebrate viruses) ICTV Study Group comments (if any) and response of the proposer: Date first submitted to ICTV: July 18, 2016 Date of this revision (if different to above): ICTV-EC comments and response of the proposer: Page 1 of 12 MODULE 2: NEW SPECIES creating and naming one or more new species.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodents Prevention and Control
    RODENTS PREVENTION AND CONTROL Santa Cruz County Mosquito & Vector Control 640 Capitola Road • Santa Cruz, CA 95062 (831) 454-2590 www.agdept.com/mvc.html [email protected] Protecting Public Health Since 1994 RODENT SERVICES Residents, property managers, and businesses in Santa Cruz County can request a site visit to assist them with rodent issues to protect public health. Our services include an exterior inspection of your home in which a certified technician looks for rodent entry points and gives advice on preventing rodents from getting into your home. Employees do not bait or trap, but provide guidance and recommendations such as blocking openings and reducing food sources and hiding places. GENERAL INFORMATION Control strategies may vary depending on pest species. ROOF RAT Rattus rattus (also known as black rat, fruit rat or ship rat) Tail Longer than head and body combined Body Slender, belly can be white, light gray, or light tan Ear Large Eye Large Nose Pointed Habits Climb Feces Smaller, pointy ends (actual size) Roof Rat (Rattus rattus)** NORWAY RAT Rattus novegicus (also known as wharf rat,brown rat, sewer rat, common rat) Tail Shorter than head and body combined (If you fold tail back, it cannot reach its head) Body Heavy, thick Ear Small Eye Small Nose Blunt Habits Burrow, can enter through a hole the size of a quarter, likes water Feces Rounder, blunt ends (actual size) Norway Rat (Rattus novegicus)** 2 HOUSE MOUSE Mus musculus Feet Small Head Small Habits Common in homes and buildings, can enter through a hole as small
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Native and Non-Native Rats (Rattus Spp.) Along an Elevational Gradient in a Tropical Rainforest of Southern Luzon, Philippines
    ECOTROPICA 14: 129–136, 2008 © Society for Tropical Ecology DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE RATS (RATTUS SPP.) ALONG AN ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT IN A TROPICAL RAINFOREST OF SOUTHERN LUZON, PHILIPPINES Cristina C. Salibay & Hazel Anne V. Luyon De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines Abstract. Rats (Muridae) of the genus Rattus occur in the Philippines, both as native and as invasive species. While the invasive species are well known to use a large range of anthropogenic habitats, little is known about their potential to occur in forest areas. We studied the occurrence and relative abundance of different species of Rattus in forests along elevational gradients on three mountains within the Palay-palay / Mataas na Gulod National Park in Southern Luzon, Philippines. Four Rattus species were collected and their occurrence and relative abundance were found to differ significantly between species and along elevational gradients. Rattus norvegicus (40.3% of captures), R. tanezumi (21.5%), and R. argentiventer (5.6%) are invasive species and R. everetti (32.7%) a native forest-inhabiting species. While the three invasive species were most abundant at low elevations, R. everetti was most abundant at higher elevations. The number of invasive rats has been attributed to their survival and adaptation at lower elevations, where habitat conversion and degradation are most intense, while native species are more common at higher elevations where habitat is relatively un- disturbed. Key words: elevation, forest species, invasive species, Philippines, rainforest, Rattus species. INTRODUCTION and occur at high abundances in local mammal as- semblages (Heaney et al. 1998, Steppan et al. 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Invaders: Trends of Gigantism in Insular Introduced Rats
    Environmental Conservation (2018) 45 (3): 203–211 C Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2018 doi:10.1017/S0376892918000085 Changing invaders: trends of gigantism in insular THEMATIC SECTION Humans and Island introduced rats Environments ALEXANDRA A.E. VAN DER GEER∗ Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Date submitted: 7 November 2017; Date accepted: 20 January 2018; First published online 14 March 2018 SUMMARY within short historical periods (Rowe-Rowe & Crafford 1992; Michaux et al. 2007;Renaudet al. 2013; Lister & Hall 2014). The degree and direction of morphological change in Additionally, invasive species may also alter the evolutionary invasive species with a long history of introduction pathway of native species by mechanisms such as niche are insufficiently known for a larger scale than the displacement, hybridization, introgression and predation (e.g. archipelago or island group. Here, I analyse data for 105 Mooney & Cleland 2001; Stuart 2014; van der Geer et al. island populations of Polynesian rats, Rattus exulans, 2013). The timescale and direction of evolution of invasive covering the entirety of Oceania and Wallacea to test rodents are, however, insufficiently known. Data on how whether body size differs in insular populations and, they evolve in interaction with native species are urgently if so, what biotic and abiotic features are correlated needed with the increasing pace of introductions today due to with it. All insular populations of this rat, except globalized transport: invasive rodent species are estimated to one, exhibit body sizes up to twice the size of their have already colonized more than 80% of the world’s island mainland conspecifics.
    [Show full text]
  • FEEDING BERA VIOUR of the LARGE BANDICOOT RAT BANDICOTA INDICA (Bechstein) [Rodentia: Muridae]
    Rec. zool. Slirv. India, 97 (Part-2) : 45-72, 1999 FEEDING BERA VIOUR OF THE LARGE BANDICOOT RAT BANDICOTA INDICA (Bechstein) [Rodentia: Muridae] R. CHAKRABORTY and S. CHAKRABORTY Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Calcutta-700 053 INTRODUCTION Rodents are versatile in feeding behaviour and in· the choice of food. Thus, separate studies on each individual species are necessary. However, except for the stray reports of lerdon (1874), Blanford (1891), Sridhara and Srihari (1978,1979), Chakraborty and Chakraborty (1.982) and Chakraborty (1992)practically no base line data exist on the feeding behaviour and food preference of Balldicota indica. A study was therefore conductep on this aspect, in nature as well .as in the laboratory. STUDY AREA The study was conducted mainly at Sagar Island, the largest delta in the western sector of the Sundarbans and surrounded by the rivers Hugli in the northern and Western sides and river Muriganga in the eastern side. The southern part of the island faces the open sea, the Bay of Bengal. Additional studies were made at Thakurpukur and Behala areas of Western Calcutta. METHODOLOGY Specimens were collected by single door wire traps, measuring 40 cm x 20 cm x 12cm. Traps were set in the evening.(17.00 hrs. to 19.00 hrs.) and collected in the different hours of night till morning. Observations on the feeding behaviour were made particularly during moonlit nights in nature. Some observations were also made in captivity. Stomachs of 42 adult specimens (both males and females) collected duri~g different months of the year and preserved in 70 per ce.nt Ethyl alcohol.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodent Control in India
    Integrated Pest Management Reviews 4: 97–126, 1999. © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Rodent control in India V.R. Parshad Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India (Tel.: 91-0161-401960, ext. 382; Fax: 91-0161-400945) Received 3 September 1996; accepted 3 November 1998 Key words: agriculture, biological control, campaign, chemosterilent, commensal, control methods, economics, environmental and cultural methods, horticulture, India, pest management, pre- and post-harvest crop losses, poultry farms, rodent, rodenticide, South Asia, trapping Abstract Eighteen species of rodents are pests in agriculture, horticulture, forestry, animal and human dwellings and rural and urban storage facilities in India. Their habitat, distribution, abundance and economic significance varies in different crops, seasons and geographical regions of the country. Of these, Bandicota bengalensis is the most predominant and widespread pest of agriculture in wet and irrigated soils and has also established in houses and godowns in metropolitan cities like Bombay, Delhi and Calcutta. In dryland agriculture Tatera indica and Meriones hurrianae are the predominant rodent pests. Some species like Rattus meltada, Mus musculus and M. booduga occur in both wet and dry lands. Species like R. nitidus in north-eastern hill region and Gerbillus gleadowi in the Indian desert are important locally. The common commensal pests are Rattus rattus and M. musculus throughout the country including the islands. R. rattus along with squirrels Funambulus palmarum and F. tristriatus are serious pests of plantation crops such as coconut and oil palm in the southern peninsula. F. pennanti is abundant in orchards and gardens in the north and central plains and sub-mountain regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodent Damage to Various Annual and Perennial Crops of India and Its Management
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Proceedings for April 1987 Rodent Damage to Various Annual and Perennial Crops of India and Its Management Ranjan Advani Dept. of Health, City of New York Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Advani, Ranjan, "Rodent Damage to Various Annual and Perennial Crops of India and Its Management" (1987). Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings. 47. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp/47 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Rodent Damage to Various Annual and Perennial Crops of India and Its Management1 Ranj an Advani 2 Abstract.—The results of about 12 years' study deals with rodent damage to several annual and perennial crops of India including cereal, vegetable, fruit, plantation and other cash crops. The rodent species composition in order of predominance infesting different crops and cropping patterns percent damages and cost effectiveness of rodent control operations in each crop and status of rodent management by predators are analysed. INTRODUCTION attempts and preliminary investigations in cocoa and coconut crops yielded information that pods Rodents, as one of the major important and nuts worth of rupees 500 and 650 respectively vertebrate pests (Advani, 1982a) are directly can be saved when one rupee is spent on trapping of related to the production, storage and processing rodents in the plantations (Advani, 1982b).
    [Show full text]
  • Motokawa, M., Lu, K. and Lin, L. 2001. New Records of the Polynesian Rat
    Zoological Studies 40(4): 299-304 (2001) New Records of the Polynesian Rat Rattus exulans (Mammalia: Rodentia) from Taiwan and the Ryukyus Masaharu Motokawa1, Kau-Hung Lu2, Masashi Harada3 and Liang-Kong Lin4,* 1Kyoto University Museum, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan 2Taiwan Agricultural Chemicals and Toxic Substances Research Institute, Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan 413, R.O.C. 3Laboratory Animal Center, Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka 545-8585, Japan 4Laboratory of Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan 407, R.O.C. (Accepted June 19, 2001) Masaharu Motokawa, Kau-Hung Lu, Masashi Harada and Liang-Kong Lin (2001) New records of the Polynesian rat Rattus exulans (Mammalia: Rodentia) from Taiwan and the Ryukyus. Zoological Studies 40(4): 299-304. The Polynesian rat Rattus exulans (Mammalia: Rodentia: Muridae) is newly recorded from Taiwan and the Ryukyus on the basis of 3 specimens from the lowland area of Kuanghua, Hualien County, eastern Taiwan, and 2 from Miyakojima Island, the southern Ryukyus. This rat may have been introduced by ships sailing to Taiwan and the Ryukyus from other islands where the species occurs. The morphological identification of R. exulans from young R. rattus is established on the basis of cranial measurements. In R. exulans, two measure- ments (breadth across the 1st upper molar and coronal width of the 1st upper molar) are smaller than corre- sponding values in R. rattus. The alveolar length of the maxillary toothrow is smaller in R. exulans from Taiwan and the Ryukyus than in available conspecific samples from Southeast Asia and other Pacific islands. Thus, this character may be useful in detecting the origin of the northernmost populations of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nippostrongylus Marhaeniae Sp. N. and Other Nematodes Collected from Rattus Cf
    J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 62(2), 1995, pp. 111-116 Nippostrongylus marhaeniae sp. n. and Other Nematodes Collected from Rattus cf. morotaiensis in North Halmahera, Molucca Islands, Indonesia HIDEO HASEGAWA1'3 AND SYAFRUDDIN2 1 Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-01, Japan and 2 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Ujung Pandang, Indonesia ABSTRACT: Nippostrongylus marhaeniae sp. n., 2 Odilia spp., Orientostrongylus sp., Strongyloides ratti, and Mastophorus muris were collected from Rattus cf. morotaiensis from Halmahera Island, North Moluccas, In- donesia. Nippostrongylus marhaeniae resembles N. magnus and N. typicus of Australian rats in the bursal structure but is readily distinguished by having only 12 ridges of synlophe in midbody of both sexes and in that the tips of spicules are not recurved strongly. Species of Odilia were first recorded outside of New Guinea-Australian region, and 1 of the present species closely resembles O. mackerrasae from the Australian rat by having inter- mittent ridges in the ventral side. Presence of the trichostrongyloids closely related to the Australian represen- tatives suggests that these nematodes were introduced by some rats from the New Guinea-Australian region and have been maintained within the endemic rat community on Halmahera Island. KEY WORDS: Nippostrongylus marhaeniae sp. n., nematodes, Rattus cf. morotaiensis, Halmahera Island, Indonesia, systematics, zoogeography. Rattus morotaiensis Kellog, 1945, is distrib- Nematode specimens are deposited in the United uted in North Moluccas, Indonesia (type locality: States National Museum Helminthological Collection (USNM Helm. Coll.), Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A. The Morotai Island) (Musser and Carleton, 1993).
    [Show full text]