Seeing and Believing (John 20^1-10).Pages
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
John 20:19-23
Restoration Ministries Listening Prayer – An Experience of Lectio Divina www.restorationmn.org John 18:12-18 (NLT) So the soldiers, their commanding officer, and the Temple guards arrested Jesus and tied him up. 13 First they took him to Annas, since he was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, the high priest at that time. 14 Caiaphas was the one who had told the other Jewish leaders, “It’s better that one man should die for the people.” 15 Simon Peter followed Jesus, as did another of the disciples. That other disciple was acquainted with the high priest, so he was allowed to enter the high priest’s courtyard with Jesus. 16 Peter had to stay outside the gate. Then the disciple who knew the high priest spoke to the woman watching at the gate, and she let Peter in. 17 The woman asked Peter, “You’re not one of that man’s disciples, are you?” “No,” he said, “I am not.” 18 Because it was cold, the household servants and the guards had made a charcoal fire. They stood around it, warming themselves, and Peter stood with them, warming himself. For Reflection and Prayer: Was there a word, phrase or image which caught your attention you as you listened to or slowly read the text? Quietly reflect on it in your prayer with Jesus. Journal your conversation. What feelings – either comfortable or uncomfortable - are rising up in you as you listen to this story? Where do you feel what you feel? Refrain from judging the feeling and gently bring this awareness into your prayer with Jesus. -
Small Group Questions “Trials & Denials” John 18:12-27
We realize you may not be able to discuss c. Read 1 Timothy 1:6-7. From this passage, how is all the questions. Pick the ones you like. the Spirit of God working in Timothy’s life? How Small Group Questions does the Spirit help in times of fear? “Trials & Denials” d. How is the Spirit of God working to help you be John 18:12-27 the person God wants you to be? Does the Spirit help you overcome fear in your life? Previous message summary: John’s purpose for writing the Gospel of John is, “so that you may believe that Jesus is the Discussion Questions Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life Read John 18:12-27 in his name” (John 20:31). John’s purpose is understood when we look at his account of the betrayal and arrest of Jesus. 2. What do the band of soldiers and those who came to Jesus goes to the garden where he knows Judas will find him Jesus at night do to him? Why do they bind him? before he is betrayed and arrested. We also see in the arrest a. Where do the soldiers take Jesus? Why do they that it is Jesus who first approaches the “band” of soldiers (600 of them) and asks who they are looking for. It is also Jesus who take him to this person? speaks the name of God, and at this, the highly trained military b. Who is Caiaphas? What position does he hold? men fall to the ground. -
John 20:10-18 Luke 8:1-3
CALLED TO SUPPORT DEVOTIONAL READING: ROMANS 4:13-25 BACKGROUND SCRIPTURE: MARK 15:40; 16:1-9; LUKE 8:1-3; JOHN 20:10-18 LUKE 8:1-3 1 And it came to pass afterward, that he went throughout every city and village, preaching and shewing the glad tidings of the kingdom of God: and the twelve were with him, 2 And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils, 3 And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod’s steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance. MARK 15:40 40 There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome. JOHN 20:10-18 10 Then the disciples went away again unto their own home. 11 But Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping: and as she wept, she stooped down, and looked into the sepulchre, 12 And seeth two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain. 13 And they say unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? She saith unto them, Because they have taken away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid him. 14 And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus. 15 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away. -
Gospel Reading John 20:19-23 Brief Commentary
CATHOLIC CONVERSATIONS ON THE SCRIPTURES Archdiocese of Miami - Ministry of Christian Formation Saturday, May 10: Ordinations to the Priesthood, Cathedral, 10:00 am May 11, 2008 Pentecost Day* (Cycle A) Gospel reading John 20:19-23 On the evening of that first day of the week, when the doors were locked, where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and said to them, “Peace be with you.” When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. The disciples rejoiced when they saw the Lord. Jesus said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, so I send you.” And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. Whose sins you forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins you retain are retained.” *Originally the Jewish feast to offer God the first fruits of the harvest. It was celebrated seven weeks after Passover; thus, the Greek name Pentekoste , meaning the 50th day. Brief commentary: The Gospel of John gives a unique account of the coming of the Holy Spirit upon the disciples. At this first encounter of Jesus with the believing community, he breathed the Spirit* on the disciples and simultaneously sent them out as the Father had sent him. The mission of Jesus, the proclamation of the Reign of God, a reign of love, justice and peace, is now placed in the hands of the disciples. They must carry out the work of making God’s compassion and forgiveness known to all. -
Jesus Before the Priests (John 18:12-24)
Jesus Before the Priests (John 18:12-24) Scripture Text: 12. So the Roman cohort and the commander and the officers of the Jews, arrested Jesus and bound Him, 13. and led Him to Annas first; for he was father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year. 14. Now Caiaphas was the one who had advised the Jews that it was expedient for one man to die on behalf of the people. 15. Simon Peter was following Jesus, and so was another disciple. Now that disciple was known to the high priest, and entered with Jesus into the court of the high priest, 16. but Peter was standing at the door outside. So the other disciple, who was known to the high priest, went out and spoke to the doorkeeper, and brought Peter in. 17. Then the slave-girl who kept the door *said to Peter, “You are not also one of this man’s disciples, are you?” He *said, “I am not.” 18. Now the slaves and the officers were standing there, having made a charcoal fire, for it was cold and they were warming themselves; and Peter was also with them, standing and warming himself. 19. The high priest then questioned Jesus about His disciples, and about His teaching. 20. Jesus answered him, “I have spoken openly to the world; I always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where all the Jews come together; and I spoke nothing in secret. 21. Why do you question Me? Question those who have heard what I spoke to them; they know what I said.” 22. -
Mary in Film
PONT~CALFACULTYOFTHEOLOGY "MARIANUM" INTERNATIONAL MARIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE (UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON) MARY IN FILM AN ANALYSIS OF CINEMATIC PRESENTATIONS OF THE VIRGIN MARY FROM 1897- 1999: A THEOLOGICAL APPRAISAL OF A SOCIO-CULTURAL REALITY A thesis submitted to The International Marian Research Institute In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Licentiate of Sacred Theology (with Specialization in Mariology) By: Michael P. Durley Director: Rev. Johann G. Roten, S.M. IMRI Dayton, Ohio (USA) 45469-1390 2000 Table of Contents I) Purpose and Method 4-7 ll) Review of Literature on 'Mary in Film'- Stlltus Quaestionis 8-25 lli) Catholic Teaching on the Instruments of Social Communication Overview 26-28 Vigilanti Cura (1936) 29-32 Miranda Prorsus (1957) 33-35 Inter Miri.fica (1963) 36-40 Communio et Progressio (1971) 41-48 Aetatis Novae (1992) 49-52 Summary 53-54 IV) General Review of Trends in Film History and Mary's Place Therein Introduction 55-56 Actuality Films (1895-1915) 57 Early 'Life of Christ' films (1898-1929) 58-61 Melodramas (1910-1930) 62-64 Fantasy Epics and the Golden Age ofHollywood (1930-1950) 65-67 Realistic Movements (1946-1959) 68-70 Various 'New Waves' (1959-1990) 71-75 Religious and Marian Revival (1985-Present) 76-78 V) Thematic Survey of Mary in Films Classification Criteria 79-84 Lectures 85-92 Filmographies of Marian Lectures Catechetical 93-94 Apparitions 95 Miscellaneous 96 Documentaries 97-106 Filmographies of Marian Documentaries Marian Art 107-108 Apparitions 109-112 Miscellaneous 113-115 Dramas -
Nicodemus: an Encounter
Lumen et Vita ~ Vol. 3 ~ 2013 Nicodemus: An Encounter Joshua Johnson Boston College INTRODUCTION This paper offers an exegesis and interpretation of John 3:1-15, Jesus' encounter with Nicodemus, one of the gospel's most memorable characters. Central to this discussion will be the significance of the symbol of rebirth. I will conclude by synthesizing the themes that appear in the exegesis and interpretation section. We shall see that the Nicodemus story offers the reader a reconfiguration of reality as Nicodemus is invited to be born again by receiving Jesus. METHODOLOGY I will start by briefly discussing the methodology and philosophy behind my exegesis and LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ6SXUQLQJSKLORVRSK\PRVWRIWHQHQGVQRWLQ³QRSKLORVRSK\EXWXQFRQVFLRXV SKLORVRSK\DQGDOOWRRHDVLO\EDGSKLORVRSK\´1 Broadly, this reading is primarily literary and theological. That is, it reflects on how John's gospel reveals divine reality through the vehicle of narrative. This reading is more specifically hermeneutical, influenced by Paul Ricoeur and his interlocutors. Like Ricoeur, I take Aristotle's understanding of narrative as foundational: it is mythos-mi mesi s. Mythos³WKHDFWLYHVHQVHRIRUJDQL]LQJHYHQWVLQWRDV\VWHP´2 Mimesis: not merely a replica of an action, but an active recreation that produces events by emplotment.3 Reading a text involves threHOHYHOVRIPRYHPHQWVRIPLPHVLVWKH³SUHILJXUDWLRQ´RIWKHUHDGHU ZKRKDVQRWHQWHUHGLQWRWKHWH[WWKH³FRQILJXUDWLRQ´WKDWWKHWH[WZRUNVRQWKHUHDGHUE\LWV HPSORWPHQWDQGWKH³UHILJXUDWLRQ´RIWKHUHDGHUZKRVHZRUOGLVFKDQJHGE\UHDGLQJWKHWH[W4 The aim of exegesis is to clarify the intended configurational sense of the text. The text's work of configuration is not complete until this move has happened. Its intelligibility lies in the real world, it creates a world of its own, and it makes claims on the reader in the real world. -
(John 20:9): a Study in Narrative Time
ITQ0010.1177/0021140013517530Irish Theological QuarterlyMoloney 517530research-article2014 Article Irish Theological Quarterly 2014, Vol. 79(2) 97 –111 ‘For As Yet They Did Not © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: Know the Scripture’ (John sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0021140013517530 20:9): A Study in Narrative itq.sagepub.com Time Francis J. Moloney, SDB, AM, FAHA Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry, Australian Catholic University, Australia Abstract Reference to ‘the Scripture’ that Peter and the Beloved Disciple do not ‘yet’ understand in John 20:9 remains a problem for interpreters of John. Which passage from Israel’s Sacred Scriptures lies behind this conclusion to the episode of the two disciples at the empty tomb? This essay argues that John 20:9 is part of a larger narrative and theological strategy (see also 2:22; 12:16; 20:30–31) that presents the Gospel of John as ‘Scripture.’ The disciples, players in the story, do ‘not yet’ know this Scripture. A later generation, those who have the Gospel of John in hand, who have not seen yet believe (v. 29), have access to a Scripture ‘written’ that they may go on believing (vv. 30–31). Keywords believing without seeing, Beloved Disciple, Gospel of John, narrative time, ‘Scripture’, ‘written’ lmost a decade ago I published a study suggesting that the author of the Gospel of AJohn regarded his story of Jesus as ‘Scripture.’1 I returned to this question some years later, in a reflection that further suggested that the author of the Fourth Gospel 1 Francis J. Moloney, ‘The Gospel of John as Scripture’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 67 (2005): 454–68. -
Uses of the Bible in Contemporary Horror Films Mary Ann Beavis St
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The University of Nebraska, Omaha Journal of Religion & Film Volume 7 Article 2 Issue 2 October 2003 12-14-2016 "Angels Carrying Savage Weapons:" Uses of the Bible in Contemporary Horror Films Mary Ann Beavis St. Thomas More College, [email protected] Recommended Citation Beavis, Mary Ann (2016) ""Angels Carrying Savage Weapons:" Uses of the Bible in Contemporary Horror Films," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 7 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol7/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Angels Carrying Savage Weapons:" Uses of the Bible in Contemporary Horror Films Abstract As one of the great repositories of supernatural lore in Western culture, it is not surprising that the Bible is often featured in horror films. This paper will attempt to address this oversight by identifying, analyzing and classifying some uses of the Bible in horror films of the past quarter century. Some portrayals of the Bible which emerge from the examination of these films include: (1) the Bible as the divine word of truth with the power to drive away evil and banish fear; (2) the Bible as the source or inspiration of evil, obsession and insanity; (3) the Bible as the source of apocalyptic storylines; (4) the Bible as wrong or ineffectual; (5) the creation of non-existent apocrypha. -
John 20:1-31 Resurrection!
John 20:1-31 Resurrection! If someone wanted to disprove Christianity—to destroy the credibility of Christianity—what one thing would they seek to disprove? Jesus’ resurrection Why? If Christ is not raised, then all we have is another martyr dying for another cause. This would mean that Jesus is no different than any of the other great religious leaders. “And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith….And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins” (1 Corinthians 15:14, 17). All the Gospels honor Mary Magdalene by mentioning her as the first person to come to the tomb. What does that say about her? She had great courage, devotion, and love for Jesus because she had been forgiven much. She came prepared to anoint the dead body of Jesus. She did not come with the intention of becoming a witness to His resurrection, but that is precisely what happened. What do we know about Mary Magdalene? Mary Magdalene is the woman from whom Jesus had earlier cast out seven demons (Luke 8:1-3). From that point in time, she seems to have faithfully followed Jesus, along with other women who supported Jesus and His disciples out of their own means. Where did we last see Mary Magdalene? She was at the foot of the cross in John 19:25. In verse 7, what is the significance of the description of the burial cloth? The way the cloths were left indicate that Jesus’ departure from the tomb was orderly/unhurried. -
Jesus Through the Eyes of Faith Jeremiah 31:1-6 John 20:1-18 “She Said to Them, 'They Have Taken Away My Lord, and I Do
Jesus through the Eyes of Faith Jeremiah 31:1-6 John 20:1-18 “She said to them, ‘They have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid him.’ When she had said this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but she did not know that it was Jesus.” On this glad and holy morning when we greet one another with the words, “He is risen!” “He is risen indeed!” I suspect most of us in this sanctuary are saying more than we know. I think this because, on every other morning of our lives, what we know involves being able to see and hear and touch and test the object of our knowing. But when we say, “He is risen!” “He is risen indeed!” we are speaking as those who can only know and see him who was raised from the dead by faith. Now lest you think faith involves believing, with the White Queen of Alice through the Looking Glass, six impossible things before breakfast, let us agree that faith has nothing to do with believing even one impossible thing. Faith is a relationship of trust. It is the gift of a meeting,” Karl Barth says, “in which [we] are free to hear the word…God has spoken in Jesus Christ in such a way that, in spite of all that contradicts it, [we] may once for all, exclusively and entirely, hold to [God’s] promise and guidance.” To see Jesus through the eyes of faith is to put all your trust in the love that death cannot end. -
John 21: a Johannine Model of Leadership
JOHN 21: A JOHANNINE MODEL OF LEADERSHIP RANDY POON In John 21:1-25, the author, John, retells his personal account of an encounter between his fellow disciples and Jesus following His resurrection. Utilizing inner texture analysis in the socio-rhetorical tradition, I examine the text and look to John’s perspective of Jesus as a leader. My analysis also examines from the Johannine viewpoint Jesus’ role as change agent and guide with a focus on Jesus’ interaction with Peter. I compare and contrast this insight with current social theories and models of leadership, as well as outline the social and cultural dynamics of leadership. I: Inner Texture Analysis of John 21:1-25 The use of socio-rhetorical criticism, a multi-dimensional approach to textual analysis introduced by Robbins, allows us to use multiple layers or textures to interpret the text. While his approach involves several perspectives in which to explore the various textures, we focus on the first of these perspectives, the inner texture. He suggests that this involves looking at “the repetition of particular words, the creation of beginnings and endings, alternation of speech and storytelling, particular ways in which 1 the words present arguments, and the particular ‘feel’ or aesthetic of the text.” 1 Vernon K. Robbins, Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press, 1996), 3. Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership 1, no. 1 (Fall 2006), 49-70. © 2006 School of Global Leadership and Entrepreneurship, Regent University JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVES IN LEADERSHIP 50 Narratological Units In commencing this socio-rhetorical interpretation of John 21:1-25, it would appear there are three narratological units within the text, each beginning with a narrative account.