DOCSLIB.ORG

AUN-QA Assessment – from Program to Institutional Level VULII Leadership and Best Practices Forum 18 &19 May 2016 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AUN-QA Assessment – from Program to Institutional Level VULII Leadership and Best Practices Forum 18 &19 May 2016 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam AUN-QA Assessment – From Program to Institutional Level VULII Leadership and Best Practices Forum 18 &19 May 2016 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Johnson Ong Chee Bin AUN-QA Expert (Singapore) AUN-QA Assessment 1 [email protected] ASEAN University Network (AUN) 1992 Initiation of ASEAN University Network at the 4th ASEAN Summit 1995 Establishment of the ASEAN University Network Charter 2008 Became one of the ASEAN Sectoral Ministerial Bodies responsible for higher education cooperation and development. Brunei Darussalam Myanmar Cambodia The Philippines Indonesia Singapore Lao PDR Thailand Malaysia Viet Nam Source: QA Development in ASEAN_09 Dec 2014 AUN-QA Assessment 2 [email protected] ASEAN University Network (AUN) AUN Mandate Strengthen the existing network of cooperation among universities in ASEAN and beyond; Promote collaborative study, research and educational programmes in the priority areas identified by ASEAN; Promote cooperation and solidarity among scholars, academicians and researchers in the ASEAN Member States; and Serve as the policy-oriented body in higher education in the ASEAN region. Source: QA Development in ASEAN_09 Dec 2014 AUN-QA Assessment 3 [email protected] ASEAN University Network (AUN) A S E A N C o m m u n i t y Socio-Cultural Economic Political Community Community Community Promote deeper Narrow Invest in People Narrow digital divide regional awareness development gap AUN AUN China-AUN ACTS AUNIP IAI Policy Level Student Exchange Scholarship AUN-QA Distinguished Scholar Initiative for ASEAN Collaborative Research AUNILO AUN-HREN AUN/SEED-Net Integration Programme Academic International College Special Education Forum & ASEAN Youth Cultural ASEAN Studies AGBEP Taskforce Young Speaker Contest Forum Conference Student Programme Source: QA Development in ASEAN_09 Dec 2014 AUN-QA Assessment 4 [email protected] AUN-QA Network • AUN-QA was established in 1998 • Bangkok Accord in 2000 • Network of Chief Quality Officers (CQOs) • 30 AUN Members and 31 AUN-QA Associate Members AUN-QA Assessment 5 [email protected] AUN-QA Network • Strengthen QA Professionals in ASEAN • Uplift quality of education at institutional and programme 1.(U-U) level through AUN-QA Assessment • Engage with the international/national QA networks for 2.(G-G) system development and recognition • Expand AUN-QA Cooperation with dialogue partners (ASEAN+3) 3.(R-R) • Jointly developed “Institutional Assessment” with ASEAN and EU partners under “EU-SHARE Programme” Source: QA Development in ASEAN_09 Dec 2014 AUN-QA Assessment 6 [email protected] AUN-QA Network AUN-QA Assessment 7 [email protected] AUN-QA Model Strategic QA (Institutional) Programme QA Institutional QA Assessment since Assessment 2007 commencing Systemic QA Oct 2016 (Internal QA System) Functional QA (Education, Research and Service) AUN-QA Assessment 8 [email protected] AUN-QA Model AUN-QA Assessment (for the purpose of improving the effectiveness of QA system) • De facto QA framework in ASEAN • Non-prescriptive • Focus on improvement • Principles-based framework AUN-QA Assessment 9 [email protected] AUN-QA Model Characteristics Principles-Based Rules-Based View of Quality System Integrated & Systemic Standalone & Ad-hoc Focus Improvement Compliance Feedback Formative Summative Improvement Objective Continuous & Contextualisation Static & Standardisation Reference Framework & Non-Prescriptive Standards & Prescriptive Assessors Skilled Peers Technical Experts Assessment Climate Mutual Respect & Trust Fearful and Suspicious Motivation for Intrinsic Extrinsic Assessment Methodology Assessment or Evaluation Audit Adapted from source: “Principles-based accreditation: the way forward?” by Lindsay H Heywood AUN-QA Assessment 10 [email protected] AUN-QA Model Source: “Principles-based accreditation: the way forward?” by Lindsay H Heywood AUN-QA Assessment 11 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment AUN-QA Assessment 12 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment AUN-QA Assessment 13 [email protected] AUN-QA at Programme Level Version 0 Version 1 Version 2 Version 3 2007 – 2010 2011 – 2016 2016/17 18 Criteria 15 Criteria onwards 11 Criteria AUN-QA Assessment 14 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results 1st AUN-QA Assessment Analysis 2007 – 2012 4 Countries, 7 universities, 37 Programmes AUN-QA Assessment 15 [email protected] AUN-QA at Programme Level (1st Version) Stakeholder Satisfaction Program Programme Programme Didactic Student Specification Content Organisation Concept Assessment A c h Expected Staff Quality Quality of the Quality of Student i Support Staff the Students Facilities e Advice v Learning e Outcomes Quality m Assurance Student Curriculum Staff Feedback e Teaching/ Development Stakeholders n Learning Evaluation Design Activities t s Graduate Drop Out Graduation Pass Rates Employability Profile Rates Time Quality Assurance and (Inter)national benchmarking AUN-QA Assessment 16 [email protected] AUN-QA at Programme Level (2nd Version) Stakeholders Satisfaction Programme Programme Teaching & Learning Student Structure & Specification Strategy Assessment Content A c h Student Facilities & Expected Academic Staff Support Staff Student i Advice & Infrastructure e Quality Quality Quality Support v Learning e m Outcomes Staff Quality Assurance of Stakeholders e Teaching & Learning Development n Activities Feedback t s Pass Drop Out Graduation Employability Research Rates Rates Time Quality Assurance and (Inter)national benchmarking AUN-QA Assessment 17 [email protected] AUN-QA Assessment Rating Scale Score Interpretation 1 Absolutely inadequate; immediate improvements must be made 2 Inadequate, improvements necessary 3 Inadequate, but minor improvements will make it adequate 4 Adequate as expected (meeting the AUN-QA guidelines and criteria) 5 Better than adequate (exceeding the AUN-QA guidelines and criteria) 6 Example of best practices 7 Excellent (world-class or leading practices) AUN-QA Assessment 18 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2012, N = 37) AUN-QA Assessment 19 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2012, N = 37) AUN-QA Assessment Results (by Ratings) AUN-QA Assessment 20 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2012, N = 16) AUN-QA Assessment 21 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2012, N = 8) AUN-QA Assessment 22 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2012, N = 11) AUN-QA Assessment 23 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results 2nd AUN-QA Assessment Analysis 2007 – 2014 8 Countries, 27 Universities, 107 Programmes AUN-QA Assessment 24 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2014, N = 107) AUN-QA Assessment 25 [email protected] AUN-QA Programme Assessment Results (2007 – 2014, N = 107, Mean Scores) Criteria No. of Programmes 107 2 45 1 5 1 19 4 30 1. Expected Learning Outcomes 4.5 3.1 4.6 2.5 4.3 5.0 4.7 4.1 4.4 2. Programme Specification 4.4 3.8 4.4 3.3 4.4 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.4 3. Programme Structure & Content 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.6 4.6 4.0 4.8 4.0 4.6 4. Teaching and Learning Strategy 4.6 3.5 4.7 3.3 4.1 4.0 4.8 4.1 4.6 5. Student Assessment 4.4 3.0 4.4 3.6 4.4 4.0 4.7 4.2 4.5 6. Academic Staff Quality 4.8 3.3 4.8 3.1 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.5 4.7 7. Support Staff Quality 4.3 3.4 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.0 4.7 4.3 4.3 8. Student Quality 4.9 4.1 4.9 4.0 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.9 9. Student Advice and Support 4.6 3.3 4.8 2.5 4.8 4.0 5.0 4.8 4.4 10. Facilities and Infrastructure 4.3 3.8 4.3 3.0 5.0 3.0 4.5 4.5 4.1 11. Quality Assurance of Teaching and Learning Process 4.4 3.1 4.5 3.0 4.6 4.0 4.5 3.8 4.4 12. Staff Development Activities 4.3 3.0 4.3 4.5 4.7 3.0 4.5 4.6 4.4 13. Stakeholders Feedback 4.2 3.2 4.1 2.3 4.2 3.0 4.2 4.1 4.4 14. Output 4.7 2.9 4.8 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.1 4.6 4.6 15. Stakeholders Satisfaction 4.8 3.1 4.7 5.0 4.6 4.0 5.1 5.0 5.0 Overall Verdict 4.6 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.7 4.1 4.8 4.4 4.5 AUN-QA Assessment 26 [email protected] Closing the Gaps – Constructive Alignment ELOs Student Student Teaching Teaching & Learning & Learning Assessment Assessment AUN-QA Assessment 27 [email protected] Constructive Alignment Source: Dr. Andres Winston C. Oreta, Professor in Civil Engineering, De La Salle University-Manila at http://digitalstructures.blogspot.sg/2012/01/outcomes-based-education-as-i-see-it.html AUN-QA Assessment 28 [email protected] Constructive Alignment AUN-QA Assessment 29 [email protected] Constructive Alignment © LivingBetter Vertical Alignment of Learning Outcomes and Stakeholders’ Needs QA at Programme Level 30 Constructive Alignment QA at Programme Level 31 Constructive Alignment • Educational Philosophy Culture • Articulation & Communication • Rewards & Recognition Ready • Quality Enhancement & Benchmarking • Classroom Engagement • Assessment & Feedback Teaching • Coaching & Mentoring People Learning and • Teaching & Learning Ready Outcomes Learning Competences • Pedagogical Research & Development • Facilities & Infrastructure • Technology System • Constructive Alignment in Ready Curriculum • Monitoring & Evaluation AUN-QA Assessment 32 [email protected] Constructive Alignment AUN-QA Assessment 33 [email protected] Constructive Alignment AUN-QA Assessment 34 [email protected] AUN-QA at Programme Level (3rd Version, 2017) Stakeholders’ Needs Programme Programme Structure & Teaching & Learning Student Specification Assessment Content Approach A c h Academic Staff Facilities & i Expected Support Staff Student Quality & e Quality Quality Support Infrastructure v Learning e m Outcomes e Quality Enhancement n t s Output Quality Assurance and (Inter)national benchmarking AUN-QA Assessment 35 [email protected] 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Has Aun-Qa Network Done to Uplift the Quality of Universities in Asean?”
    EDUCATION 2030 – ALIGNING INSTITUTIONAL, NATIONAL AND REGIONAL STRATEGIES TO STRENGTHEN QUALITY ASSURANCE “WHAT HAS AUN-QA NETWORK DONE TO UPLIFT THE QUALITY OF UNIVERSITIES IN ASEAN?” Assoc. Prof. Nantana Gajaseni, Ph.D. ASEAN University Network (AUN) Background: ASEAN University Network (AUN) 2 Est. since 1995 under the views of ASEAN Leaders at the 4th ASEAN Summit AUN-BOT 30 University Members 12 AUN Thematic Networks: 3 AUN-QA Network: 4 Aims to… Uplift and ensure the quality of AUN-QA is only regional QA System higher education in ASEAN in ASEAN. Promote continual quality improvement in ASEAN higher education system Principle- based quality Fitness for Enhance the regional higher assurance purpose of On voluntary education recognition continued basis & no improvement legal binding De facto ASEAN QA Framework (AQAF) Strategic QA (Institutional) Programme QA Institutional QA Assessment since Assessment 2007 Systemic QA commencing in (Internal QA System) 2017 Functional QA (Education, Research and Services) AUN-QA Framework: 6 11 Criteria 7 25 Criteria 111 Sub-criteria 8 AUN-QA Publications: 9 Guideline to Guideline to AUN-QA AUN-QA Actual Actual Assessment at AUN-QA Assessment at Institutional AUN-QA Guideline Programme Level V.2.0 Guideline V.1.0 Chinese Edition Level V.2.0 And Vietnamese Version 2004 2008 2011 2016 Guideline to AUN-QA 2006 AUN-QA Actual Guideline in 2015 2009 AUN-QA Manual V.1.0 AUN-QA Assessment at Burmese, 2016 Training Programme Level Cambodian, and Manual V.3.0 Laotian Edition And Vietnamese Edition 2 4 6 7 10 AUN-QA System Implementation: Programme Assessment 11 293 Programmes assessed arranged by country (Dec 2007- Dec 2017) 140 127 120 100 94 80 60 43 44 42 40 15 17 20 2 2 1 1 7 2 2 5 5 0 No.
    [Show full text]
  • ASEAN University Network/ Southeast Asia Engineering Education
    ASEAN University Network/ Southeast Asia Engineering Education Development Network AUN/SEED-Net Secretariat Room 109-110, Building 2, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Tel: +66 2218 6419 to 21 Fax: +66 2218 6418 E-mail: [email protected] Introduction AUN/SEED-Net was established in 2001 as a sub program of AUN. It consists of universities as shown below and aims to establish a region–wide system for advanced research and education by these universities in ASEAN and Japan. The project is mainly supported by the Japanese government through JICA. 26 Member • University of Yangon (UY) Institutions in •National University of Laos • Yangon Technological University ASEAN Countries (NUOL) (YTU) • Hanoi University of Science and Technology 14 Japanese (HUST) Supporting • Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology • Chulalongkorn University (CU) (HCMUT) Universities • King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang • Hokkaido University (Hokkaido) (KMITL) • University of the Philippines – Diliman • Keio University (Keio) • Burapha University (BUU) (UP) • Kyoto University (Kyoto) • Kasetsart University (KU) • De La Salle University (DLSU) • Kyushu University (Kyushu) • Thammasat University (TU) • Mindanao State University – Iligan • Nagoya University (Nagoya) Institute of Technology (MSU-IIT) • National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) • Institute of Technology of • Universiti Brunei Darussalam • Osaka University (Osaka) Cambodia (ITC) (UBD) • Shibaura Institute of • Universiti Teknologi Brunei
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Agreement Between the European and the ASEAN University Network Bangkok, Thailand, 20 January 2000
    Financing Agreement between the European and the ASEAN University Network Bangkok, Thailand, 20 January 2000 FINANCING AGREEMENT The European Community, hereinafter referred to as “the Community”, represented by the Commission of the European Communities, hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”, represented in turn by the Vice President of the one part, and The ASEAN University Network, hereinafter referred to as “the Beneficiary”, represented by the Chairman of the ASEAN University Network of the other part, Whereas the Cooperation between the European Community and Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Brunei and Viet Nam member countries of the ASEAN signatories of the Cooperation Agreement signed at Kuala Lumpur on 7 March 1980,1) provides for financial and technical cooperation in the pursuit of its objectives; HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1 FINANCING AGREEMENT, GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS. 1. The project described in Article 2 shall be implemented in accordance with the Financing Agreement, the General Terms and Conditions set out in Annex 1 and the Technical and Administrative Conditions in Annex 2 which form an integral part of this Agreement. 2. The Financing Agreement and the Technical and Administrative Conditions amend or supplement the General Terms and Conditions and, in the case of conflict, take precedence over the latter. _____________________________________________ 1) modified in 1985 and 1997 to take account of respectively, Brunei’s and Viet Nam’s accession to ASEAN. ARTICLE 2 NATURE AND PURPOSE OF THE OPERATION The Commission shall provide a grant to contribute to the financing of the project referred to below: Project number: ASE / B7-3010 / IB / 97/ 0178 Title : ASEAN-EU University Network Programme (AUNP) Hereinafter referred to as “the project” which is described in the Technical and Administrative Provisions in Annex 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Within Asean Connectivity
    Asia Pacific Studies Volume 2 No. 1/ January – June 2018 HIGHER EDUCATION WITHIN ASEAN CONNECTIVITY Yuliana R. Prasetyawati; Cornelia Alverina ¹Head of Centre For ASEAN Public Relation Studies, LSPR - Jakarta, Jl. K.H. Mas Mansyur Kav. 35 Sudirman Park, Central Jakarta, 10220, Indonesia ²Postgraduate Students, LSPR - Jakarta, Jl. K.H. Mas Mansyur Kav. 35 Sudirman Park, Central Jakarta, 10220, Indonesia ¹[email protected]; ²[email protected] Abstract ASEAN member countries are well aware of the importance of education as one of the decisive factors in developing a high quality of human resources. This is reflected in the inclusion of education in ASEAN socio- cultural cooperation dimension. This review will highlight the implementation of higher education in ASEAN connectivity described in five steps. Infrastructure connectivity makes the mobility of young people in ASEAN members become easier in pursuing education across ASEAN region. In addition, the improvement of facilities and infrastructure in educational institutions could support a conducive atmosphere in the teaching and learning process. Institutional connectivity could also develop human resources who are not only knowledgeable but also have compatible skills with industrial needs in ASEAN. In regional level, connectivity through ASEAN University Network will develop quality standards between AUN members which can be used as a benchmark standard of university quality in ASEAN. Young generation connectivity through students’ exchange program between many universities in ASEAN are not only for knowledge exchange but also to understand each other’s cultural diversity. Connectivity is the success key in building the ASEAN community. Connectivity plays a role in helping to reduce education gaps among ASEAN member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd ASEAN University Network Regional Workshop on University
    2nd ASEAN University Network Regional Workshop on University Social Responsibility & Sustainability (USR&S) THEME: KNOWLEDGE FOR PEOPLE: RESEARCH FOR COMMUNITY LIFE 9th – 11th May 2011 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (The National University of Malaysia) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Universities play a pivotal role in both uniting stakeholders and in educating for regional development through their education, research and service-oriented efforts. The ASEAN University Network (AUN) recently organised the 1st Workshop on University's Social Responsibility and Sustainability from ASEAN-Japan Perspectives: Sharing and Caring for a Better Community (20-22 Oct 2010, Burapha University). The basic idea of AUN University Social Responsibility and Sustainability (USR&S) involves the solid commitment of conduct for the betterment of society practised by the very components of the higher education i.e. university students and the faculty staff. With personal commitment to USR&S practised by the university, higher education could forge the personal perception and characteristics of the individuals that in turn, could promote social good in the long run. The AUN USR&S Conceptual Framework could be categorised into 4 integral areas which are: (1) Teaching and Learning, Research and Academic Services (University’s common missions), (2) University’s Governance and Administration, (3) Community Involvement, and (4) Campus Life At this workshop, representatives from the participating universities were able to share experiences and best practices in university social responsibility and sustainability (USR & S) initiatives across education, research and service from their respective universities. The general consensus at this workshop was the need to capture the knowledge on USR&S from the ASEAN region and strengthen cooperation between higher education institutions (HEIs) and diverse stakeholders in order to become a vibrant and dynamic force that can drive the development of the ASEAN community.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Peer-Reviewed Article Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education Volume 7, Issue 1 (2018), pp. 19-33 http://ojed.org/index.php/jise doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1867898 © ISSN: 2166-2681 ASEAN University Network in Enhancing Student Mobility: A Case of Indonesia Sri Soejatminah Federation University, Australia ABSTRACT Internationalization of higher education pushes for more intensive regional collaborations as well as student mobility. There are a plethora of studies exploring student mobility patterns, but research on the transformative potential of regional mobility networks is limited. As the most predominant regional network of universities in Southeast Asia, ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) University Network (AUN) commits to boosting student mobility in the region, and thus, can be conceived to be a deliberative space capable of expanding student mobility. This paper examines the role of AUN in promoting student mobility within the ASEAN region. Indonesia’s engagement is used as a point of entry to assess the extent of policies and programs in encouraging student mobility in the ASEAN region. Keywords: ASEAN University Network (AUN), Indonesia, internationalization, regionalization, student mobility Recent trends in the internationalization of higher education in South East Asia show an advancement of cooperation among countries, reflecting the globalization of higher education which involves an increasing movement of people, culture, ideas, values, knowledge, technology, and economy (Knight, 2008, Kuroda, 2016). Globalization itself constitutes “the economic, political and societal forces pushing universities toward greater international involvement” (Altbach & Knight, 2007, p. 291). One aspect of this involvement means increased mobility of students, which in the case of ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) changed from 166,000 in 2009 to 220,000 in 2013 (SHARE, 2016, p.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Tan Kay Chuan Ong Chee Bin Office of Quality Management National University of Singapore Background of ASEAN University Network (AUN)
    Regional Standards for Programme Assessment within the ASEAN University Network Tan Kay Chuan Ong Chee Bin Office of Quality Management National University of Singapore Background of ASEAN University Network (AUN) • The AUN was established in November 1995. • Charter of the AUN was signed by the ASEAN Ministers responsible for higher education. • Agreement on the Establishment of the AUN was signed by the Presidents, Rectors and Vice- Chancellors of participating universities. 2 Background of ASEAN University Network (AUN) AUN Key Objectives: • to strengthen existing network of cooperation among universities in ASEAN; • to promote collaborative study, research and educational programmes on the priority areas identified by ASEAN; • to promote cooperation and solidarity among scholars, academicians and researchers in the ASEAN Member States; and, • to serve as the policy-oriented body in higher education in the ASEAN region. 3 Background of ASEAN University Network (AUN) AUN major activities: • ASEAN Studies Programme (M.A. in ASEAN Studies) • Student and Faculty Exchange Programme • AUN Educational Forum and Young Speakers Contest • ASEAN Youth Cultural Forum • Student Exchange Programme • AUN Distinguished Scholars Programme • Collaborative Research • Information Networking (AUNILO) • AUN Quality Assurance (AUN-QA) 4 5 Evolution of AUN-QA Standards AUN-QA AUN-QA Bangkok AUN-QA AUN-QA AUN-QA Revised Operating Accord Guidelines Manual Assessment s Manual Guidelines 2000 2004 2006 2007 2011 Initiation Implementatio Improvement n 6 Initiation 7 Bangkok Accord 1. Appoint Chief Quality Officer (CQOs • 2. Formulate c ommon AUN-QA policies , criteria and benchmarking procedures 3. Identif y and encourag e the implementation of QA good practices 4. Enhance mutual collaboration and information exchange 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Package
    Application Package A Program for Fostering ASEAN Future Leaders 2014/2015 DAEJEON UNIVERSITY ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK 0 Application Package A Program for Fostering ASEAN Future Leaders 2014/2015 ********************************************** Background and Program Information: A program for Fostering ASEAN Future Leaders is an ASEAN-Korea Cooperation Project between the ASEAN University Network (AUN) and Daejeon University (DJU). The project is jointly funded by the ASEAN-ROK Future Oriented Cooperation Programs Funds and Daejeon University. The program offers exchange scholarships for 20 undergraduate students from ASEAN student to study at Daejeon University, the Republic of Korea (ROK). The scholarship includes tuition fees, room and board, round-trip ticket, basic medical insurance and living allowance (USD 300 per month) for one academic year. Daejeon University has specialized curriculum and ample experience with ASEAN student, so DJU is the only university which has launched the ASEAN – ROK International College Student Exchange Program since 2002. DJU provides ASEAN students with the opportunity to become leading role models in the future by taking the advanced level classed, while using our fully technologically equipped facilities for one academic year. Also, our program is dedicated in cultivating students to become leaders of ASEAN Nations, especially through our internship program at internationally well known organizations in Korea such as UN-APCICT, IFEZ, KNCU, KIEP and ASEAN-Korea Centre We have witnessed our students contribute to diplomatic relations between ASEAN and ROK. 1 ASEAN University Network (AUN) The ASEAN University Network was established in November 1995 under the Charter signed by the Ministers responsible for higher education in ASEAN countries. The AUN is perceived as a mechanism to help hasten solidarity and development of regional identity through the promotion of the existing network of leading universities and higher education institutions in ASEAN region.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian University Network Quality Assurance
    Asian University Network Quality Assurance Wallie remains atingle after Meier droves unheedfully or cannonaded any amicableness. Suspensory equalsArt sometimes no rigol debarredopposes artisticallyhis carousers after vortically Ephraim and primp miscegenate unseemly, soquite loquaciously! confabulatory. Unprovident Tannie Students receive accreditation provides the network quality assurance agencies are Objective criteria for ut as external examiners who finds fulfillment in. Qa is implemented by asian institute. Report this serves as expected to reflect on a clearly what mechanisms including teacher performance indicators through which iucea has policies for improvement must understand. Httpsasea-uninetorg Association of University of Asia and The Pacific AUAP. Mr Jamaluddin bin Ibrahim Quality Director of University Teknologi. QA Assessment at Programme Level ver. The student assessment including timelines, methods, regulations, weight distribution, rubrics and grading are explicit and communicated to students. The asian university network quality assurance is going on quality assurance professional agencies in asian de delivered based overseas in ut core competency framework uses cookies. For AIOU, QA has involved the internal mechanism and the external benchmark and assessment by the Higher Education Commission. Program assessment for Asean University Network Quality Assurance AUN-QA. Student progress is systematically recorded and monitored, feedback to students and corrective actions are ample where necessary. QA coordinators at
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement on the Establishment of the Asean University Network
    15 AGREEMENT ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ASEAN UNIVERSITY NETWORK The leading universities of ASEAN namely Universiti Brunei Darussalam of Brunei Darussalam, Universitas Indonesia and Universitas Gadjah Mada of Indonesia, Universiti Sains Malaysia and Universiti Malaya of Malaysia, University of the Philippines and De La Salle University of the Philippines, National University of Singapore and Nanyang Technological University of Singapore, and Chulalongkorn University and Burapha University of Thailand at the initiative of their respective governments (hereinafter referred to as Participating Universities) and represented by their Presidents/ Rectors/Vice-Chancellors as hereunder indicated: Dato Abu Bakar Apong Vice-Chancellor, Universiti Brunei Darussalam Prof. Dr. M. K. Tadjudin Rektor, Universitas Indonesia Prof. Dr. Sukanto Reksohadiprodjo Rektor, Universitas Gadjah Mada Tan Sri Dato’ Hj. Musa bin Mohamed Vice-Chancellor, Universiti Sains Malaysia 16 Dato’ Dr. Hj. Abdullah Sanusi bin Ahmad Vice-Chancellor, Universiti Malaya Dr. Emil Q. Javier President, University of the Philippines Dr. Andrew Gonzalez President, De La Salle University Prof. Lim Pin Vice-Chancellor, National University of Singapore Dr. Cham Tao Soon President, Nanyang Technological University Prof. Dr. Charas Suwanwela, M.D. President, Chulalongkorn University Ass. Prof. Dr. Phasook Kullavanij President, Burapha University DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS : The Participating Universities, in pursuance of the Charter of the ASEAN University Network, and as founding members, shall endeavour to promote human resource and capability development to further strengthen the existing network of leading universities and institutions of higher learning in the ASEAN region through the establishment of the ASEAN University Network, which shall hereinafter be referred to as AUN. 17 ARTICLE I OBJECTIVES The AUN shall have the following objectives: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education in ASEAN
    Higher Education in ASEAN © Copyright, The International Association of Universities (IAU), October, 2016 The contents of the publication may be reproduced in part or in full for non-commercial purposes, provided that reference to IAU and the date of the document is clearly and visibly cited. Publication prepared by Stefanie Mallow, IAU Printed by Suranaree University of Technology On the occasion of Hosted by a consortium of four Thai universities: 2 Foreword The Ninth ASEAN Education Ministers Qualifications Reference Framework (AQRF) Meeting (May 2016, in Malaysia), in Governance and Structure, and the plans to conjunction with the Third ASEAN Plus institutionalize the AQRF processes on a Three Education Ministers Meeting, and voluntary basis at the national and regional the Third East Asia Summit of Education levels. All these will help enhance quality, Ministers hold a number of promises. With credit transfer and student mobility, as well as the theme “Fostering ASEAN Community of university collaboration and people-to-people Learners: Empowering Lives through connectivity which are all crucial in realigning Education,” these meetings distinctly the diverse education systems and emphasized children and young people as the opportunities, as well as creating a more collective stakeholders and focus of coordinated, cohesive and coherent ASEAN. cooperation in education in ASEAN and among the Member States. The Ministers also The IAU is particularly pleased to note that the affirmed the important role of education in Meeting approved the revised Charter of the promoting a better quality of life for children ASEAN University Network (AUN), better and young people, and in providing them with aligned with the new developments in ASEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • 07-0055 (001-170).Pmd 1 6/2/2550, 11:43 AUN-QA Manual
    Supported by HRK German Rectors’ Conference _07-0055 (000).pmd 1 6/2/2550, 11:44 Preface The Manual for the Implementation of the AUN-QA Guidelines is as a road map for what the AUN-QA calls “the Journey to Uplift the Quality of Higher Education in ASEAN Universities”. With the Assistance from the ASEAN-EU University Network Programme (AUNP) in the area of Quality Assurance (QA), Drs. Ton Vroeijenstijn was recruited to conduct surveys and workshops at the AUN member universities in 9 ASEAN countries. Workshops were conducted, basing on the common criteria and procedures described in the AUN-QA Guidelines. In July 2005, The Chief Quality Officers (CQOs) gathered at the ASEAN Regional Workshop on QA at Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City to discuss concepts and elements of internal and external assessment and also to outline the structure of the national workshops in order to suit each university’s requirement. Subsequent workshops on QA were conducted in Viet Nam, Thailand, Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, Cambodia, Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam. The Workshops appeared that the Guidelines were not always clear and were sometimes difficult to interpret and implement. It was shown the need to set a workshop on the AUN-QA to train CQOs and to put the Guidelines into practices. The CQOs met again at the Workshop in Yogjakarta in December 2005. They agreed to develop a Working Manual, supporting the universities for applying the AUN-QA Guidelines. The Manual would help the universities’ understanding on the Guidelines. To complete with the Manual, the German Rectors’ Conference (HRK) expressed their willingness to cooperate with the AUN in the framework of regionalization of Quality Assurance as happening in Central America and East Africa.
    [Show full text]