Policy Communication and the Influence Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Policy Communication and the Influence Of Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School Spring 2018 Policy Communication and the Influence of Agricultural Communities on Karst Landscapes: A Case Study In Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng National Park, Vietnam Elizabeth Willenbrink Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Indigenous Education Commons, and the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Willenbrink, Elizabeth, "Policy Communication and the Influence of Agricultural Communities on Karst Landscapes: A Case Study In Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng National Park, Vietnam" (2018). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 2076. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/2076 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICY COMMUNICATION AND THE INFLUENCE OF AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITIES ON KARST LANDSCAPES: A CASE STUDY IN PHONG NHA- KẺ BÀNG NATIONAL PARK, VIETNAM A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geography and Geology Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Elizabeth Willenbrink May 2018 DEDICATIONS This work is dedicated to James Tyler Graham, my greatest champion. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Leslie North for her mentorship, advising, and encouragement throughout the process of researching and writing this thesis. Additional thanks to committee members Dr. Jason Polk, Dr. Pat Kambesis, and Vu Thi Minh Nguyet for graciously helping me complete this project. To James, Jenna, and Hali, thank you endlessly for listening and helping me in times of need, your presence throughout graduate school has been a true pleasure. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Research Questions ......................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................5 2.1 Karst Landscapes ............................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Karst and Agriculture ....................................................................... 7 2.2 Policy ............................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Agricultural Land Delegation ........................................................... 9 2.2.2 Land Management and Protected Areas ......................................... 11 2.3 Agriculture and Karst in Southeast Asia ....................................................... 15 2.3.1 Karst of Southeast Asia ...................................................................15 2.3.2 Southeast Asian Agriculture ............................................................16 2.4 Agricultural Land and Karst Management in Vietnam ................................. 17 2.4.1 Agriculture of Vietnam ................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Vietnamese Land Tenancy ............................................................. 18 2.4.3 Vietnam’s Land Quality ................................................................. 19 2.4.4 Karst Management Policy in Vietnam ........................................... 20 2.5 Communication ............................................................................................. 22 2.5.1 Informal Communication in Agricultural Communities .................22 2.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 3: Study Area ..................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Physical Geography ....................................................................................... 28 3.1.1 Flora and Fauna .............................................................................. 31 v 3.2 Cultural Geography ....................................................................................... 32 3.2.1 Ethnic Groups ................................................................................. 35 3.2.2 Agriculture ...................................................................................... 36 3.3 Park Management ...........................................................................................37 3.3.1 Tourism............................................................................................39 3.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 4: Methodology .................................................................................................. 44 4.1 Data Collection .............................................................................................. 44 4.1.1 Observations ................................................................................... 45 4.1.2 Semi-Structured Interviews ............................................................ 47 4.1.3 GPS Data Collection....................................................................... 53 4.2 Data Processing, Interpretation, and Analysis ............................................... 56 4.3 Limitations of Methodology .......................................................................... 59 4.4 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 60 Chapter 5: Results and Discussion .................................................................................. 62 5.1 State and Local Political and Communication Structure of Vietnam ............ 66 5.2 Political and Communication Structure in PN-KB National Park ................ 70 5.3 Communication Flow Within Phong Nha- Kẻ Bàng Management Board .... 74 5.3.1 Communication Trends among PN-KB Management Officials .... 74 5.3.2 Information access among PN-KB Management Officials ............ 75 5.4 Communication and Information Flow Among Park Rangers ...................... 81 5.4.1 Communication Trends among Park Rangers ................................ 83 5.4.2 Communication Barriers ................................................................ 86 vi 5.4.3 Information Access among Park Rangers ...................................... 90 5.5 Communication and Information Flow Among Park Residents ................... 92 5.5.1 Communication Trends among Park Residents ............................. 92 5.5.2 Information Access among Park Residents .................................. 101 5.6 Challenges and Strengths in Agricultural Management in PN-KB ............. 104 5.7 Recommendations for Future Management Practices in PN-KB ................ 111 5.7.1 Recommendations for Research and Information Access ............ 118 5.7.2 Recommendations for Management and Communication ........... 124 Chapter 6: Conclusion ................................................................................................... 134 References ..................................................................................................................... 140 Appendices .................................................................................................................... 147 Appendix A: Semi-Structured Interview Questions .......................................... 147 Appendix B: Resident Interviewees Demographics .......................................... 149 Appendix C: Interviewee Monikers .................................................................. 151 Appendix D: Coded Rangers Interview Analysis ............................................. 154 Appendix E: Coded Officials Interview Analysis ............................................. 156 Appendix F: Coded Residents Interview Analysis ............................................ 159 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Hydrology affecting karst aquifers ................................................................. 7 Figure 2.2 Protected area and buffer zone ...................................................................... 13 Figure 2.3 Global distribution of farms less than one hectare ........................................ 16 Figure 3.1 Map of Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng National Park .................................................. 28 Figure 3.2 Communes within Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng National Park ................................ 33 Figure 3.3 Human population density among communes in PN-KB National Park ...... 35 Figure 3.4 Management structure of Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng National Park ..................... 38 Figure 3.5 Tourist destinations in Vietnam .................................................................... 41 Figure 3.6 Tourist destinations in Phong Nha-Kẻ Bàng National Park.......................... 42 Figure 4.1 Photograph of an interview with two park rangers ....................................... 48 Figure 4.2 Photograph of an interview with a park resident .......................................... 49 Figure 4.3 Photograph of a resident reading informed consent form ............................
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Virginia's Karst
    Introduction to Virginia’s Karst A presentation of The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Karst Program & Project Underground Karst - A landscape developed in limestone, dolomite, marble, or other soluble rocks and characterized by subsurface drainage systems, sinking or losing streams, sinkholes, springs, and caves. Cross-section diagram by David Culver, American University. Karst topography covers much of the Valley and Ridge Province in the western third of the state. Aerial photo of karst landscape in Russell County. Smaller karst areas also occur in the Cumberland Plateau, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain provinces. At least 29 counties support karst terrane in western Virginia. In western Virginia, karst occurs along slopes and in valleys between mountain ridges. There are few surface streams in these limestone valleys as runoff from mountain slopes disappears into the subsurface upon contact with the karst bedrock. Water flows underground, emerging at springs on the valley floor. Thin soils over fractured, cavernous limestone allow precipitation to enter the subsurface directly and rapidly, with a minimal amount of natural filtration. The purer the limestone, the less soil develops on the bedrock, leaving bare pinnacles exposed at the ground surface. Rock pinnacles may also occur where land use practices result in massive soil loss. Precipitation mixing with carbon dioxide becomes acidic as it passes through soil. Through geologic time slightly acidic water dissolves and enlarges the bedrock fractures, forming caves and other voids in the bedrock. Water follows the path of least resistance, so it moves through voids in rock layers, fractures, and boundaries between soluble and insoluble bedrock.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with Karst Booklet and Poster
    Publishing Partners AGI gratefully acknowledges the following organizations’ support for the Living with Karst booklet and poster. To order, contact AGI at www.agiweb.org or (703) 379-2480. National Speleological Society (with support from the National Speleological Foundation and the Richmond Area Speleological Society) American Cave Conservation Association (with support from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation and a Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Kentucky Division of Water) Illinois Basin Consortium (Illinois, Indiana and Kentucky State Geological Surveys) National Park Service U.S. Bureau of Land Management USDA Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey AGI Environmental Awareness Series, 4 A Fragile Foundation George Veni Harvey DuChene With a Foreword by Nicholas C. Crawford Philip E. LaMoreaux Christopher G. Groves George N. Huppert Ernst H. Kastning Rick Olson Betty J. Wheeler American Geological Institute in cooperation with National Speleological Society and American Cave Conservation Association, Illinois Basin Consortium National Park Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, USDA Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey ABOUT THE AUTHORS George Veni is a hydrogeologist and the owner of George Veni and Associates in San Antonio, TX. He has studied karst internationally for 25 years, serves as an adjunct professor at The University of Ernst H. Kastning is a professor of geology at Texas and Western Kentucky University, and chairs Radford University in Radford, VA. As a hydrogeolo- the Texas Speleological Survey and the National gist and geomorphologist, he has been actively Speleological Society’s Section of Cave Geology studying karst processes and cavern development for and Geography over 30 years in geographically diverse settings with an emphasis on structural control of groundwater Harvey R.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats, White-Nose Syndrome, and Federal Cave and Mine Closures
    BATS, WHITE-NOSE SYNDROME, AND FEDERAL CAVE AND MINE CLOSURES A report by the Center for Biological Diversity January 26, 2011 Cover photo: Little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) in a New York cave, displaying characteristic fuzz of white-nose syndrome on nose and wings. Credit: Al Hicks, New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation For more information about this report, contact: Mollie Matteson, Conservation Advocate Center for Biological Diversity, Northeast Field Office PO Box 188 Richmond, Vermont 05477 802-434-2388 [email protected] Center for Biological Diversity, Federal Cave Closures 2 Bats, White-nose Syndrome, and Federal Cave and Mine Closures Delay is the deadliest form of denial. ~~C. Northcote Parkinson, British historian, 1909-1993 Executive Summary In the span of just four winters, a deadly new disease called white-nose syndrome (WNS) that devastates bat populations has spread rapidly across the country from east to west. The bat illness was first documented in a cave in upstate New York in 2006, and as of spring 2010, the white- nose pathogen had been reported as far west as western Oklahoma (see Figure 1). In affected bat colonies, mortality rates have reached as high as 100 percent, virtually emptying caves once harboring tens of thousands of bats and leaving cave floors littered with the innumerable small bones of the dead. At least six bat species are known to be susceptible, and the fungus associated with the disease has been found on another three species. Two federally listed endangered bat species are among those affected thus far. Scientists and conservationists are gravely concerned that if current trends continue, one or more bat species could become extinct in the next couple of decades or sooner.
    [Show full text]
  • YGLC Info for Cavers FINAL1~09
    www.caves.org Youth Group Caving Legal Issues and General Information for the Experienced Caver Prepared by the Youth Groups Liaison Committee of the National Speleological Society and NSS members Introduction Make a difference Have you ever met an ill-equipped youth group in a cave that exceeded the group's skill level? You may have encountered a cave being vandalized by youths who didn't know any better. Do you think caves would benefit from more professionals in cave management and the cave-related sciences? By working with youth groups who plan to go caving, you can have a positive effect in all of these areas. Not only can you provide a quality caving experience for the youths, but most importantly, you can also instill in them sound principles for safe caving, as well as a good conservation ethic. You can be the one who infuses them with an appreciation for the value of caves and their contents that they will carry with them into adulthood. It is these youths who will be making decisions that will affect caves and cave areas in the future. A very good way to accomplish this is by working through national youth organizations. Girl Scouts USA, Boy Scouts of America, 4-H, church youth groups, youth summer camps, schools, and at-risk youth groups provide the framework that makes educating young people about caves and caving easier and safer for all. Some cavers really enjoy working with youth. Guiding a well-trained and well- behaved youth group through a cave can be a highly rewarding experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Development Mechanism and Characteristics Based on Comprehensive Exploration Along Jinan Metro, China
    sustainability Article Karst Development Mechanism and Characteristics Based on Comprehensive Exploration along Jinan Metro, China Shangqu Sun 1,2, Liping Li 1,2,*, Jing Wang 1,2, Shaoshuai Shi 1,2 , Shuguang Song 3, Zhongdong Fang 1,2, Xingzhi Ba 1,2 and Hao Jin 1,2 1 Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China; [email protected] (S.Sun); [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (S.Shi); [email protected] (Z.F.); [email protected] (X.B.); [email protected] (H.J.) 2 School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China 3 School of Transportation Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 August 2018; Accepted: 19 September 2018; Published: 21 September 2018 Abstract: Jinan is the capital of Shandong Province and is famous for its spring water. Water conservation has become the consensus of Jinan citizens and the government and the community. The construction of metro engineering in Jinan has lagged behind other cities of the same scale for a long time. The key issue is the protection of spring water. When metro lines are constructed in Jinan karst area, the water-inrushing, quicksand, and piping hazards can easily occur, which can change the groundwater seepage environment and reduce spring discharge. Therefore, we try to reveal the development conditions, mechanism, and mode of karst area in Jinan. In addition, we propose the comprehensive optimizing method of “shallow-deep” and “region-target” suitable for exploration of karst areas along Jinan metro, and systematically study the development characteristics of the karst areas along Jinan metro, thus providing the basis for the shield tunnel to go through karst areas safely and protecting the springs in Jinan.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology
    Hydrogeologic Characterization and Methods Used in the Investigation of Karst Hydrology By Charles J. Taylor and Earl A. Greene Chapter 3 of Field Techniques for Estimating Water Fluxes Between Surface Water and Ground Water Edited by Donald O. Rosenberry and James W. LaBaugh Techniques and Methods 4–D2 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................................75 Hydrogeologic Characteristics of Karst ..........................................................................................77 Conduits and Springs .........................................................................................................................77 Karst Recharge....................................................................................................................................80 Karst Drainage Basins .......................................................................................................................81 Hydrogeologic Characterization ...............................................................................................................82 Area of the Karst Drainage Basin ....................................................................................................82 Allogenic Recharge and Conduit Carrying Capacity ....................................................................83 Matrix and Fracture System Hydraulic Conductivity ....................................................................83
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes
    Environmental Change at Kartchner Caverns: Trying to Separate Natural and Anthropogenic Changes Rickard S. Toomey, III, and Ginger Nolan Kartchner Caverns State Park, Arizona State Parks, Benson, AZ Abstract—Cave temperature and moisture levels are important factors in the environmental health of Kartchner Caverns. Monitoring indicates the cave has warmed and moisture levels have fallen over the past 14 years. Timing and patterns of change within the cave suggest that changes are due to development as a show cave. However, changes in other caves, surface temperature and precipitation, and in shallow local aquifers suggest that cave changes relate to regional patterns. Changes at Kartchner Caverns represent a combination of anthropogenic and regional natural causes. Separating these different factors is an important on-going goal in protecting the cave. Kartchner Caverns State Park (KCSP) is a show cave in The primary long-term temperature and humidity data southeastern Arizona. The cave was discovered in 1974 and from the cave come from Environmental Monitoring Stations became a State Park in 1988 (Tufts and Tenen 1999). After (EMS) within the cave (figure 1). These are locations at pre-development studies to assess the condition of the cave, which air, water, and soil temperature, relative humidity, to establish baseline data, and to determine how best to de- and pan evaporation are measured manually on a periodic velop the cave, Arizona State Parks began development of basis, usually weekly or monthly. Temperatures are measured the cave for ecological education and tourism. The develop- with small, digital probe thermometers; relative humidity is ment included creating tunnel entrances to the cave, building measured using a digital probe thermometer equipped as a trails for tours, and installing a lighting system.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MSS LIAISON VOLUME 58 NUMBER 9-10 September - October 2018 AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS: CHOUTEAU-KCAG-LEG-LOG-MMV-MSM-MVG-OHG-PEG-RBX- SPG-SEMO-MCKC-CCC-CAIRN
    THE MSS LIAISON VOLUME 58 NUMBER 9-10 September - October 2018 AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS: CHOUTEAU-KCAG-LEG-LOG-MMV-MSM-MVG-OHG-PEG-RBX- SPG-SEMO-MCKC-CCC-CAIRN. Distributed free on the MSS website: http://www.mospeleo,org/ Subscription rate for paper copies is $10.00 per year. Send check or money order made out to the Missouri Speleological Survey to the Editor, Gary Zumwalt, 1681 State Route D, Lohman, MO 65053. Telephone: 573-782-3560. Missouri Speleological Survey President's Message October 2018. Despite the foreboding forecast of biblical rains, the Fall MSS meeting at Current River State Park was a great time. Before the weekend began, we had a long list of objectives and a sizable group of cavers expected to come, as well as ambitious plans for a large map and gear display for the public. Weathermen across the region however, conspired to keep people home with predictions of heavy rain throughout the weekend and flash flood warnings across the state. As the weekend drew nearer, the number of cavers bowing out increased by the day. Nevertheless, while it did rain all day Friday and poured on us during the drive down Friday night, the rest of the weekend was fairly dry and beautiful. The Current didn't rise, so one small group monitored caves via kayak and a much larger group went to Echo Bluff State Park to work on graffiti removal, left over the Camp Zoe events, as well as to perform a bio survey, per request of the park, to see whether the cave closure had any noticeable impact on the presence of cave life.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Pdf of the Subterranean Renovations Publication
    SUBTERRANEAN RENOVATIONS THE UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL SPACES OF SHOW CAVES Under America’s surficial terrain, another landscape lurks, where built and natural forms blend to create unusual spaces, in some of the more compelling tourist caves in the United States. ike an elaborate stage for an audienceless performance, spectacular natural caves L formed and transformed over the ages in the unseen world of the underground. Typically evolving drop by drop, as the earth melted away with the natural dissolution of limestone, strange sculptural creations grew in hollow cracks and capacious chambers; white curtains of speleothems like frozen waterfalls and delicate dioramas of stalactites mutated in geologic slow motion. Shallow pools of still water would mirror seemingly limitless distances, were it not for the absence of light, and sounds would echo, oddly magnified, except for the near total silence. When modern humans came into this subterranean world, first as explorers, then as tour- ists, they brought with them both light and sound, as well as shovels, cement, electricity, postcards, and even fried chicken. From the first lantern-led tours through Mammoth Cave in the early 1800's to the drive-through caves of today, the two hundred or so caves in the country that have been opened to the public (out of over 30,000 caves discovered in the United States so far) have been transformed by the interests of tourism and the fancy of cave owners and promoters. Most modifications to the natural cave are of a practical nature, made in order to accom- modate visitors. New cave entrances are blasted to allow more convenient access, path- ways are installed to allow visitors to move easily along the otherwise uneven cave floor, and lighting of some type is installed to make the formations and pathways visible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mss Liaison
    THE MSS LIAISON VOLUME 59 NUMBER 3-4 March - April 2019 AFFILIATE ORGANIZATIONS: CAIRN – CCC – CHOUTEAU – DAEDALUS – KCAG – LEG – LOG – MCKC – MMV – MSM – MVG – OHG – PEG – RBX – SEMO – SPG. Distributed free on the MSS website: http://www.mospeleo,org/ Subscription rate for paper copies is $10.00 per year. Send check or money order made out to the Missouri Speleological Survey to the Editor, Gary Zumwalt, 1681 State Route D, Lohman, MO 65053. Telephone: 573-782-3560. Missouri Speleological Survey - President's Message - April 2019 by Dan Lamping. Our spring board meeting is quickly approaching on the weekend of May 3-5, 2019 at the Ozark Underground Laboratory (OUL) in Protem, MO within Taney County. The focus of the weekend won't be the board meeting itself, but rather to kick-off a resurvey effort of Tumbling Creek Cave to make a complete, up-to-modern-standards map for use within a GIS platform. Tumbling Creek is a roughly two mile long cave and home to a rare cave snail. The idea for the project was initiated by OUL owner Tom Aley and then further encouraged by Scott House. This will be an open project of the MSS, so those willing to actively help in the survey are welcome to attend. No experience is needed to participate, but an interest in learning is a must. If you have question about the cave trip please contact me at [email protected] Other caving opportunities will be available within the nearby Mark Twain National Forest for those who want to do their own thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Aquifers: Demonstration Using a Physical Model
    Understanding Aquifers: Demonstration using a Physical Model Part I: Aquifers Explained Geology is the science of planet Earth, its history, and all the processes that act on it. Hydrogeology is the branch of geology which studies how water and rocks interact underground, mainly in aquifers An aquifer is a rock unit that holds enough water to supply water to wells. Aquifers can be found in many types of rocks, such as sandstone, conglomerate, unconsolidated sand and gravel, and fractured rocks composed of limestone or igneous rocks. Here at Barton Springs in Austin, Texas, we are standing on top of the Edward’s Aquifer, composed mostly of fractured limestone. These fractured rocks dissolve overtime and can create large, cave-like systems called Karst aquifers. So when you hear the word Karst, think cave. Some of these caves are big, some of them are small. Karst aquifers are different from sedimentary aquifers, where water flows mostly through the gravel and sand grains similar to a sponge. Hydrogeologists use two terms when investigating aquifers—porosity and permeability. Porosity is all the empty pore space inside a rock given in a percent volume. Porosity represents the volume of water a rock formation can potentially hold. Permeability is how well a fluid can flow within the pore spaces of the rock within the aquifer. For water, we describe this property as hydraulic conductivity. For example, clay and rocks like pumice may have high porosity, but because the pores do not connect with each other, the permeability of these rocks is usually low. Layers of low-permeability material such as clay and shale typically act as barriers to groundwater flow and may often function as an aquitard within a groundwater flow system.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Show Caves – ISCA-IUCN-UIS
    Union Internationale de Spéléologie Recommended International Guidelines for the development and management of Show Caves Developed by the International Show Caves Association (ISCA), International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), and the International Union of Speleology (UIS) 3rd November, 2014 ENGLISH LANGUAGE DOCUMENTS RECOMMENDED INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SHOW CAVES TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 01. Purpose ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 02. Contingent and Limiting Conditions ............................................................................................................. 3 03. Development of a Cave into a Show Cave ............................................................................................ 4 04. Visitor Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 05. Above Ground Level Works .................................................................................................................................... 4 06. Access into a Show Cave .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]