Of Christ’S Return to Judgment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of Christ’S Return to Judgment TRIGLOT CONCORDIA TRIGLOT CONCORDIA The Symbolical Books of the Ev. Lutheran Church, German-Latin-English, Published as a Memorial of the Quadricentenary Jubilee of the Reformation anno Domini 1917 by resolution of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. CONCORDIA The Pious Confession of Faith and Doctrine Reitereated by Unanimous Consent of the Electors, Princes, and Estates of the Empire, and of Their Theologians, who Embrace the Augsburg Confession. ————— whereunto there has been added from Holy Scripture, that Only Norm and Rule of Doctrine A Thorough Explanation of Certain Articles, which after Dr. Martin Luther’s happy departure from this life were being controverted. ————— Published by the joint resolution and order of the said Electors, Princes, and Estates of the Empire for the Instruction and Admonition of their Subjects, Churches, and Schools, as a MEMORIAL TO POSTERITY. ————— Issued for the second time at Leipzig, 1584. With the gracious privilege of the Elector of Saxony. http://wolf-359/boceng/title.htm [2/14/2001 10:22:33 AM] Table of Contents Table of Contents TRIGLOT CONCORDIA TRIGLOT CONCORDIA Preface PREFACE Three Ecumenical Creeds ECUMENICAL CREEDS. The Apostles’ Creed. The Nicene Creed. The Creed of Athanasius. Augsburg Confession II. Augsburg Confession Preface to the Emperor Charles V. Article I: Of God. Article II: Of Original Sin. Article III: Of the Son of God. Article IV: Of Justification. Article V: Of the Ministry. Article VI: Of New Obedience. Article VII: Of the Church. Article VIII: What the Church Is. Article IX: Of Baptism. Article X: Of the Lord’s Supper. Article XI: Of Confession. Article XII: Of Repentance. Article XIII: Of the Use of the Sacraments. Article XIV: Of Ecclesiastical Order. Article XV: Of Ecclesiastical Usages. Article XVI: Of Civil Affairs. Article XVII: Of Christ’s Return to Judgment. Article XVIII: Of Free Will. Article XIX: Of the Cause of Sin. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (1 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents Article XX: Of Good Works. Article XXI: Of the Worship of the Saints. ARTICLES IN WHICH ARE REVIEWED THE ABUSES WHICH HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. Article XXII: Of Both Kinds in the Sacrament. Article XXIII: Of the Marriage of Priests. Article XXIV: Of the Mass. Article XXV: Of Confession. Article XXVI: Of the Distinction of Meats. Article XXVII: Of Monastic Vows. Article XXVIII: Of Ecclesiastical Power. Conclusion. Apology APOLOGY Philip Melanchthon Presents His Greeting to the Reader. Article I: Of God. Article II (I): Of Original Sin. Article III: Of Christ Article IV (II): Of Justification. Article III: Of Love and the Fulfilling of the Law. Articles VII and VIII: Of the Church. Article IX: Of Baptism. Article X: Of the Holy Supper. Article XI: Of Confession. Article XII (V): Of Repentance. Article VI: Of Confession and Satisfaction. Article XIII. (VII): Of the Number and Use of the Sacraments. Article XIV: Of Ecclesiastical Order. Article XV (VIII): Of Human Traditions in the Church. Article XVI: Of Political Order. Article XVII: Of Christ’s Return to Judgment. Article XVIII: Of Free Will. Article XIX: Of the Cause of Sin. Article XX: Of Good Works. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (2 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents Article XXI (IX): Of the Invocation of Saints. Article XXII (X): Of Both Kinds In the Lord’s Supper. Article XXIII (XI): Of the Marriage of Priests. Article XXIV (XII): Of the Mass. Article XXVII: (XIII): Of Monastic Vows. Article XXVIII (XIV): Of Ecclesiastical Power. Smalcald Articles [The Smalcald Articles.] Preface of Dr. Martin Luther. THE FIRST PART THE SECOND PART The first and chief article is this, Article II: Of the Mass. Of the Invocation of Saints. Article III: Of Chapters and Cloisters. Article IV: Of the Papacy. THE THIRD PART OF THE ARTICLES. I. Of Sin II. Of the Law III. Of Repentance. Of the False Repentance of the Papists. IV. Of the Gospel. V. Of Baptism. VI. Of the Sacrament of the Altar. VII. Of the Keys. VIII. Of Confession. IX. Of Excommunication. X. Of Ordination and the Call. XI. Of the Marriage of Priests. XII. Of the Church. XIII. How One is Justified before God, and of Good Works. XIV. Of Monastic Vows. XV. Of Human Traditions. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (3 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents OF THE POWER AND PRIMACY OF THE POPE OF THE POWER AND PRIMACY OF THE POPE Historical Evidence Of the Power and Jurisdiction of Bishops. DOCTORS AND PREACHERS Small Catechism THE SMALL CATECHISM Preface of Dr. Martin Luther. I. THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, II. THE CREED, III. THE LORD’s PRAYER, IV. THE SACRAMENT OF HOLY BAPTISM, 15] V. HOW THE UNLEARNED SHOULD BE TAUGHT TO CONFESS. VI. THE SACRAMENT OF THE ALTAR, [Appendix I.] Morning Prayer. Evening Prayer. 7] [Asking a Blessing.] 10] Returning Thanks. [Appendix II.] 1] TABLE OF DUTIES, Large Catechism THE LARGE CATECHISM, Preface SHORT PREFACE OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER. Ten Commandments The First Commandment. [Exposition of the Appendix to the First Commandment.] The Second Commandment. The Third Commandment. The Fourth Commandment. The Fifth Commandment. The Sixth Commandment. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (4 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents The Seventh Commandment. The Eighth Commandment. The Ninth and Tenth Commandments. Conclusion of the Ten Commandments. OF THE CREED. Article I. Article II. Article III. The Lord’s Prayer. The First Petition. The Second Petition. The Third Petition. The Fourth Petition. The Fifth Petition. The Sixth Petition. The Seventh and Last Petition. OF BAPTISM. Of Infant Baptism. OF THE SACRAMENT OF THE ALTAR. Formula of Concord -- Epitome THE FORMULA OF CONCORD SUMMARY CONTENT [EPITOME] I. OF ORIGINAL SIN. AFFIRMATIVA. II. OF FREE WILL. AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. III. OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH BEFORE GOD. AFFIRMATIVA. ANTITHESIS or NEGATIVA. IV. OF GOOD WORKS. AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (5 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents V. OF THE LAW AND THE GOSPEL. AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. VI. OF THE THIRD USE OF THE LAW. AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. VII. OF THE LORD’s SUPPER. AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. VIII. OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST. AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. IX. OF THE DESCENT OF CHRIST TO HELL. X. OF CHURCH RITES AFFIRMATIVA. NEGATIVA. XI. OF GOD’S ETERNAL FOREKNOWLEDGE [PREDESTINATION] AND ELECTION. AFFIRMATIVA. ANTITHESIS or NEGATIVA. (XII.) OF OTHER FACTIONS [HERESIES] AND SECTS, Erroneous Articles of the Anabaptists. Erroneous Articles of the Schwenkfeldians. Error of the New Arians. Error of the Anti-Trinitarians. Formula of Concord -- Solid Declaration Solid Declaration Of Articles in Controversy I. OF ORIGINAL SIN. II. OF FREE WILL, OR HUMAN POWERS. III. OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH BEFORE GOD. IV. OF GOOD WORKS. V. OF THE LAW AND THE GOSPEL. VI. OF THE THIRD USE OF GOD’S LAW. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (6 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents VII. OF THE HOLY SUPPER. VIII. OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST. IX. OF THE DESCENT OF CHRIST TO HELL. X. OF CHURCH RITES, XI. OF GOD’S ETERNAL FOREKNOWLEDGE [PREDESTINATION] AND ELECTION. XII. OF OTHER FACTIONS [HERETICS] AND SECTS, Erroneous Articles of the Anabaptists. Erroneous Articles of the Schwenckfeldians. Erroneous Articles of the New Arians. Erroneous Articles of the New Anti-Trinitarians. Catalogue of Testimonies CATALOGUE OF TESTIMONIES, TO THE CHRISTIAN READER. I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. Conclusion. Visitation Articles Visitation Articles. Article I. Of the Holy Supper. Article II. Of the Person of Christ. Article III. Of Holy Baptism. Article IV. http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (7 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Table of Contents Of Predestination and the Eternal Providence of God. Concerning the Holy Supper: Concerning the Person of Christ, Concerning Holy Baptism: Concerning Predestination and the Providence of God: http://wolf-359/boceng/contents.htm (8 of 8) [2/14/2001 10:22:29 AM] Preface PREFACE to the Christian Book of Concord. To the Readers, one and all, of these Writings of ours, we, the Electors, Princes, and Deputies of the Holy Roman Empire in Germany, adherents of the Augsburg Confession, who have subscribed our names to the same, announce and declare, according to the dignity and rank of each one, our devotion, friendship, and greeting, combined with willing service. It is a remarkable favor of Almighty God that in these last times and in this old age of the world He has willed, according to His unspeakable love, forbearance, and mercy, that after the darkness of papistical superstitions the light of His Gospel and Word, through which alone we receive true salvation, should arise and shine clearly and purely in Germany, our most beloved fatherland. And on this account, indeed, a brief and succinct confession was prepared from the Word of God, and the most holy writings of the Prophets and Apostles, and at the Diet of Augsburg, in the year 1530, was offered, by our most godly ancestors, in the German and Latin languages, to the Emperor Charles V, of excellent memory, and laid before [all] the deputies of the Empire, and finally, being circulated publicly among all men professing Christian doctrine, and thus in the entire world, was diffused everywhere, and began to be current in the mouths and speech of all. Afterwards many churches and schools embraced and defended this Confession as a symbol of the present time in regard to the chief articles of faith, especially those involved in controversy with the Romanists and various corruptions of the heavenly doctrine [sects], and with perpetual agreement have appealed to it without any controversy and doubt.
Recommended publications
  • Robert D. Hawkins
    LEX OR A NDI LEX CREDENDI THE CON F ESSION al INDI ff ERENCE TO AL TITUDE Robert D. Hawkins t astounds me that, in the twenty-two years I have shared Catholics, as the Ritualists were known, formed the Church Iresponsibility for the liturgical formation of seminarians, of England Protection Society (1859), renamed the English I have heard Lutherans invoke the terms “high church” Church Union (1860), to challenge the authority of English and “low church” as if they actually describe with clar- civil law to determine ecclesiastical and liturgical practice.1 ity ministerial positions regarding worship. It is assumed The Church Association (1865) was formed to prosecute in that I am “high church” because I teach worship and know civil court the “catholic innovations.” Five Anglo-Catholic how to fire up a censer. On occasion I hear acquaintances priests were jailed following the 1874 enactment of the mutter vituperatively about “low church” types, apparently Public Worship Regulation Act for refusing to abide by civil ecclesiological life forms not far removed from amoebae. court injunctions regarding liturgical practices. Such prac- On the other hand, a history of the South Carolina Synod tices included the use of altar crosses, candlesticks, stoles included a passing remark about liturgical matters which with embroidered crosses, bowing, genuflecting, or the use historically had been looked upon in the region with no lit- of the sign of the cross in blessing their congregations.2 tle suspicion. It was feared upon my appointment, I sense, For readers whose ecclesiological sense is formed by that my supposed “high churchmanship” would distract notions about the separation of church and state, such the seminarians from the rigors of pastoral ministry into prosecution seems mind-boggling, if not ludicrous.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Concord FAQ God's Word
    would be no objective way to make sure that there is faithful teaching and preaching of The Book of Concord FAQ God's Word. Everything would depend on each pastor's private opinions, subjective Confessional Lutherans for Christ’s Commission interpretations, and personal feelings, rather than on objective truth as set forth in the By permission of Rev. Paul T. McCain Lutheran Confessions. What is the Book of Concord? Do all Lutheran churches have the same view of the Book of Concord? The Book of Concord is a book published in 1580 that contains the Lutheran No. Many Lutheran churches in the world today have been thoroughly influenced by the Confessions. liberal theology that has taken over most so-called "mainline" Protestant denominations in North America and the large Protestant state churches in Europe, Scandinavia, and elsewhere. The foundation of much of modern theology is the view that the words of What are the Lutheran Confessions? the Bible are not actually God's words but merely human opinions and reflections of the The Lutheran Confessions are ten statements of faith that Lutherans use as official ex- personal feelings of those who wrote the words. Consequently, confessions that claim planations and summaries of what they believe, teach, and confess. They remain to this to be true explanations of God's Word are now regarded more as historically day the definitive standard of what Lutheranism is. conditioned human opinions, rather than as objective statements of truth. This would explain why some Lutheran churches enter into fellowship arrangements with What does Concord mean? non-Lutheran churches teaching things in direct conflict with the Holy Scriptures and the Concord means "harmony." The word is derived from two Latin words and is translated Lutheran Confessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Confession (Book of Concord, Pp. 476-80)
    May: [Note to the readers. With this installment, our series Learning Luther ceases for the summer months to resume in September. Church leaders! If you have enjoyed and profited from these studies, permit me to exhort you to share the experience in an age appropriate way by supporting our new program, TforTeens ("Theology for Teens") at Roanoke College this summer. Please identify those young people in your midst who would benefit from this week with Prof. Ned Wisnefske, Chaplain Chris Bowen, our Synod Youth Minister Dave Delaney and myself. We will be pouring over the story of Creation and Fall in Genesis 1-3 with help from Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Martin Luther. The cost is virtually free. Invest with us in cultivating future leaders of the church! -- Dr. Paul Hinlicky] Confession (Book of Concord, pp. 476-80) Introduction By Paul R. Hinlicky, Tise Professor of Lutheran Studies, Roanoke College & Docent, Evanjelicka Bohoslovecka Fakulta, Univerzita Komenskeho, Bratislava, Slovakia. Confession is not a sacrament as such but a sacramental practice that negotiates between baptism into Christ and reception of His supper. It consists in contrite confession of sin and pronunciation of divine forgiveness. It may be public and general, as is customary in many Lutheran churches. It may also be private and particular. The latter Luther not only allows but emphatically endorses, indeed, he exhorts Christians to it in this concluding part of his Large Catechism. As we heard last time, Luther refused to make a legalistic rule about frequency of communion, as had been done previously. Confession to the priest had been made a precondition to worthy reception; it was extorted with a checklist of prohibited thoughts, words and deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Abuses Under Indictment at the Diet of Augsburg 1530 Jared Wicks, S.J
    ABUSES UNDER INDICTMENT AT THE DIET OF AUGSBURG 1530 JARED WICKS, S.J. Gregorian University, Rome HE MOST recent historical scholarship on the religious dimensions of Tthe Diet of Augsburg in 1530 has heightened our awareness and understanding of the momentous negotiations toward unity conducted at the Diet.1 Beginning August 16, 1530, Lutheran and Catholic represent­ atives worked energetically, and with some substantial successes, to overcome the divergence between the Augsburg Confession, which had been presented on June 25, and the Confutation which was read on behalf of Emperor Charles V on August 3. Negotiations on doctrine, especially on August 16-17, narrowed the differences on sin, justification, good works, and repentance, but from this point on the discussions became more difficult and an impasse was reached by August 21 which further exchanges only confirmed. The Emperor's draft recess of September 22 declared that the Lutheran confession had been refuted and that its signers had six months to consider acceptance of the articles proposed to them at the point of impasse in late August. Also, no further doctrinal innovations nor any more changes in religious practice were to be intro­ duced in their domains.2 When the adherents of the Reformation dis­ sented from this recess, it became unmistakably clear that the religious unity of the German Empire and of Western Christendom was on the way to dissolution. But why did it come to this? Why was Charles V so severely frustrated in realizing the aims set for the Diet in his conciliatory summons of January 21, 1530? The Diet was to be a forum for a respectful hearing of the views and positions of the estates and for considerations on those steps that would lead to agreement and unity in one church under Christ.3 1 The most recent stage of research began with Gerhard Müller, "Johann Eck und die Confessio Augustana/' Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Biblio­ theken 38 (1958) 205-42, and continued in works by Eugène Honèe and Vinzenz Pfhür, with further contributions of G.
    [Show full text]
  • [Formula of Concord]
    [Formula of Concord] Editors‘ Introduction to the Formula of Concord Every movement has a period in which its adherents attempt to sort out and organize the fundamental principles on which the founder or founders of the movement had based its new paradigm and proposal for public life. This was true of the Lutheran Reformation. In the late 1520s one of Luther‘s early students, John Agricola, challenged first the conception of God‘s law expressed by Luther‘s close associate and colleague, Philip Melanchthon, and, a decade later, Luther‘s own doctrine of the law. This began the disputes over the proper interpretation of Luther‘s doctrinal legacy. In the 1530s and 1540s Melanchthon and a former Wittenberg colleague, Nicholas von Amsdorf, privately disagreed on the role of good works in salvation, the bondage or freedom of the human will in relationship to God‘s grace, the relationship of the Lutheran reform to the papacy, its relationship to government, and the real presence of Christ‘s body and blood in the Lord‘s Supper. The contention between the two foreshadowed a series of disputes that divided the followers of Luther and Melanchthon in the period after Luther‘s death, in which political developments in the empire fashioned an arena for these disputes. In the months after Luther‘s death on 18 February 1546, Emperor Charles V finally was able to marshal forces to attempt the imposition of his will on his defiant Lutheran subjects and to execute the Edict of Worms of 1521, which had outlawed Luther and his followers.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoky Mountain Bible Institute History 140 Reformation & the Book Of
    Smoky Mountain Bible Institute History 140 Reformation & the Book of Concord Previously we focused primarily on the first 1500 years of Christianity’s history. Now, we will proceed from there forward, focusing on the Lutheran perspective. We just celebrated the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther’s nailing of the 95 theses to the castle church in Wittenberg on October 31st, 1517. This is seen by most of the world as the beginning of the Reformation. The 95 Theses themselves were primarily concerned with the practice of selling indulgences; full-fledged Lutheran theology was “hammered out” much more thoroughly in the years that followed. From the time of 1517 and on, the Reformation can be covered from many historical angles, but I would like to track it through its clear confession of biblical truth as we believe, teach, and confess it today. Because of Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press, these confessional documents were mass- produced and distributed, spreading the faith eventually all over the world. 1529 is the next significant date. Luther wanted to produce a simple tool for parents to use to teach their children the faith. So, he produced The Large and Small Catechisms, which give the clearest and briefest explanations of what the 10 commandments, creeds, Lord’s Prayer, baptism, confession & absolution, and Lord’s Supper mean in the daily life of every Christian. In the same year Luther was brought before the diet (a royal legislative court) at Worms and on the 18th of April, refused to recant his writings with the famous “Here I Stand” speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Journal Fall 2011 Volume 37 | Number 4 Concordia Seminary Concordia Seminary Place 801 MO 63105 St
    Concordia Seminary Concordia Journal 801 Seminary Place St. Louis, MO 63105 COncordia Fall 2011 Journal volume 37 | number 4 Fall 2 01 1 volume 37 | number Oral Performance of Biblical Texts in the Early Church Publishing Authority: 4 The Text of the Book of Concord A Bibliography of the 1580 Dresden Concordia COncordia CONCORDIATHEOLOGY.ORG Journal Faculty blogs on current events, multimedia, preaching (ISSN 0145-7233) resources, articles and archives…all in one place. publisher Faculty Dale A. Meyer David Adams Erik Herrmann Victor Raj President Charles Arand Jeffrey Kloha Paul Robinson Andrew Bartelt R. Reed Lessing Robert Rosin Keep up with what’s new Executive EDITOR Joel Biermann David Lewis Timothy Saleska William W. Schumacher Gerhard Bode Richard Marrs Leopoldo Sánchez M. on Facebook and Twitter. Dean of Theological Kent Burreson David Maxwell David Schmitt Research and Publication William Carr, Jr. Dale Meyer Bruce Schuchard www.facebook.com/ EDITOR Anthony Cook Glenn Nielsen William Schumacher Travis J. Scholl Timothy Dost Joel Okamoto William Utech concordiatheology Managing Editor of Thomas Egger Jeffrey Oschwald James Voelz Theological Publications Jeffrey Gibbs David Peter Robert Weise Bruce Hartung Paul Raabe twitter.com/csltheology EDITORial assistant Melanie Appelbaum Exclusive subscriber digital access All correspondence should be sent to: via ATLAS to Concordia Journal & assistants CONCORDIA JOURNAL Concordia Theology Monthly: Carol Geisler 801 Seminary Place http://search.ebscohost.com Theodore Hopkins St. Louis, Missouri 63105 User ID: ATL0102231ps Check out our mobile site Melissa LeFevre 314-505-7117 Password: subscriber Technical problems? for theology on-the-go. Matthew Kobs cj @csl.edu Email [email protected] Issued by the faculty of Concordia Seminary, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formula of Concord As a Model for Discourse in the Church
    21st Conference of the International Lutheran Council Berlin, Germany August 27 – September 2, 2005 The Formula of Concord as a Model for Discourse in the Church Robert Kolb The appellation „Formula of Concord“ has designated the last of the symbolic or confessional writings of the Lutheran church almost from the time of its composition. This document was indeed a formulation aimed at bringing harmony to strife-ridden churches in the search for a proper expression of the faith that Luther had proclaimed and his colleagues and followers had confessed as a liberating message for both church and society fifty years earlier. This document is a formula, a written document that gives not even the slightest hint that it should be conveyed to human ears instead of human eyes. The Augsburg Confession had been written to be read: to the emperor, to the estates of the German nation, to the waiting crowds outside the hall of the diet in Augsburg. The Apology of the Augsburg Confession, it is quite clear from recent research,1 followed the oral form of judicial argument as Melanchthon presented his case for the Lutheran confession to a mythically yet neutral emperor; the Apology was created at the yet not carefully defined border between oral and written cultures. The Large Catechism reads like the sermons from which it was composed, and the Small Catechism reminds every reader that it was written to be recited and repeated aloud. The Formula of Concord as a „Binding Summary“ of Christian Teaching In contrast, the „Formula of Concord“ is written for readers, a carefully- crafted formulation for the theologians and educated lay people of German Lutheran churches to ponder and study.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission As Nota Ecclesiae?: Testing the Scope of Augsburg Confession 7 and 8
    Is mission a sign of the church? The Rev. Dr. Klaus Detlev Schulz’s presentation from the Mission as Nota Ecclesiae?: Concordia University Irvine Joint Professors’ Conference Testing the Scope of explains. Augsburg Confession 7 and 8 by Klaus Detlev Schulz n our discussion of AC VII and AC VIII, a few the mission discussions orbited around these articles fundamental questions have to be answered if we gradually illuminated their missiological potential.2 bring systematics and missiology together, as I’m told I. Stage 1: Mission marginalized Ito do. How do the two articles in the Augsburg Confession relate to missions? How does ecclesiology inform mission The ecclesiology of the Augsburg Confession as and how does mission inform ecclesiology? Is, as my title defined in AC VII did not go unnoticed by mission schol- indicates, mission a sign of the church? Here we touch on ars. For example, in an essay, Theological Education in a sensitive topic. In terms of becoming Missionary Perspective, David Bosch involved in mission both theologically Mission is not takes a stab at the Protestant defini- tions of the church, of which AC VII and in practice, Lutheranism is a the possession of Johnny-come-lately. It took time to was the first: develop a missiology that would clarify a few committed Another factor responsible for the issues related to foreign missions. Of Christians more present embarrassment in the field course, as rightly pointed out, Luther’s pious than others of mission is that the modern mis- theology and Lutheran theology is a seed . but rather it sionary enterprise was born and 1 bed for missions, yet the seed still had belongs to the bred outside the church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Word-Of-God Conflict in the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod in the 20Th Century
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Master of Theology Theses Student Theses Spring 2018 The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century Donn Wilson Luther Seminary Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Donn, "The Word-of-God Conflict in the utherL an Church Missouri Synod in the 20th Century" (2018). Master of Theology Theses. 10. https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/mth_theses/10 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Theology Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE WORD-OF-GOD CONFLICT IN THE LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD IN THE 20TH CENTURY by DONN WILSON A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Luther Seminary In Partial Fulfillment, of The Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF THEOLOGY THESIS ADVISER: DR. MARY JANE HAEMIG ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Mary Jane Haemig has been very helpful in providing input on the writing of my thesis and posing critical questions. Several years ago, she guided my independent study of “Lutheran Orthodoxy 1580-1675,” which was my first introduction to this material. The two trips to Wittenberg over the January terms (2014 and 2016) and course on “Luther as Pastor” were very good introductions to Luther on-site.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 the Church in the Late Sixteenth Century
    Medieval and Reformation Church History Western Reformed Seminary (http://wrs.edu) John A. Battle, Th.D. CHAPTER 10 THE CHURCH IN THE LATE SIXTEENTH CENTURY Germany and the Lutherans after Luther’s death Political situation Other nations solidifying: England Spain France (language developing) Germany, Italy, Switzerland still in Holy Roman Empire, emperor crowned by pope Free cities generally independent Switzerland generally independent Only legal religions in Germany: Roman Catholicism Lutheranism Religious situation in general Reformation ideas widespread Spain: good start Poland: 1/3 converted Italy: many clergymen Austria: great bulk of people Switzerland: progress Especially widespread throughout Germany Variety of views 10.1 Diversity after Roman Catholic conformity Controversies in German Lutheran churches Reformed churches on borders Melanchthon’s controversies Situation in Saxony: Melanchthon the strongest influence there Opposed Calvinistic predestination (and strong statements of Luther) But influenced by Calvin and others on communion His school: “Philippists” or “Crypto-Calvinists” Prevailed for a time in Saxony Opposition to Melanchthon Lutherans generally accepted his milder view of predestination But bitter attacks against him and his views on Lord’s Supper Intolerant attitude of “real” Lutherans, called “Gnesio Lutherans”; they wanted state suppression of Philippists, consulted rulers Melanchthon’s death (1560) Attacks against him bitter and persistent 1560, about to die, “free from the bitterness of theologians” Spread
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lutheran Confessions: Dialogue Within the Reformation Spirit Oscar Cole-Arnal
    Consensus Volume 7 | Issue 3 Article 1 7-1-1981 Concordia' and 'unitas' in the Lutheran confessions: dialogue within the Reformation spirit Oscar Cole-Arnal Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus Recommended Citation Cole-Arnal, Oscar (1981) "Concordia' and 'unitas' in the Lutheran confessions: dialogue within the Reformation spirit," Consensus: Vol. 7 : Iss. 3 , Article 1. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/consensus/vol7/iss3/1 This Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consensus by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “CONCORDIA” AND “UNITAS” IN THE LUTHERAN CONFESSIONS Dialogue Within the Reformation Spirit Oscar L. Arnal Within the process of determining the criteria for fellowship among Canadian Lutherans, this symposium has been assigned the specific task of analyzing the re- lationship between concordia and unitas in the Lutheran Confessions. With that end in mind, I propose a comparison of two sets of our symbolic documents, namely the Augsburg Confession and the Book and Formula of Concord. By employing such a method, it is hoped that our historical roots may be utilized in the service of our re- sponsibility to critique and affirm each other. Before one can engage in this dialogue with the past, it becomes necessary to come to terms with our own presuppositions and initial assumptions. All our asser- tions, even our historical and doctrinal convictions, are rooted within the reality of our biological and sociological environments. We speak out of experiences which are our own both individually and collectively.
    [Show full text]