Hypercharge Assignments of Fields

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hypercharge Assignments of Fields PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 Dr. Anosh Joseph, IISER Mohali LECTURE 49 Monday, April 20, 2020 (Note: This is an online lecture due to COVID-19 interruption.) Topic: Hypercharge Assignments of Fields. Charged and Neutral Currents. Fermion Mass Terms. Hypercharge Assignments of Fields Let us denote the hypercharges of left-handed fields by YL and YQ. They are the same for each generation. Let us also denote the hypercharges of the right-handed fields by Ye, Yν, Yu and Yd. They are also the same for each generation. That is, for left-handed fields ! ! ! νeL νµL ντL L1 = ;L2 = ;L3 = : with same hypercharge YL; (1) eL µL τL ! ! ! uL cL tL Q1 = ;Q2 = ;Q3 = : with same hypercharge YQ; (2) dL sL bL and for the right-handed fields eR; µR; τR : with same hypercharge Ye; (3) νeR; νµR; ντR : with same hypercharge Yν; (4) uR; cR; tR : with same hypercharge Yu; (5) dR; sR; bR : with same hypercharge Yd: (6) Using the index i = 1; 2; 3 to denote the generations we can write the Lagrangian for the gauge interactions in the following form a a 0 a a 0 L = iLi @= − igW= T − ig YLB= Li + iQi @= − igW= T − ig YQB= Qi i 0 i i 0 i +ieR @= − ig YeB= eR + iνR @= − ig YνB= νR i 0 i i 0 i +iuR @= − ig YuB= uR + idR @= − ig YdB= dR: (7) PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 We note that the quarks also have charges under SU(3)QCD, and they are not shown in the above expression. Since we will almost always be performing computations in the broken phase, where left- and right-handed spinors combine into a single Dirac representation, it is generally easier to use the Dirac-spinor notation from the start, where L and R indicate implicit chirality projectors. That is, y 0 µ Qi@Q= i = Qi γ γ @µPLQi; (8) 1 with PL = 2 (1 − γ5) and i i iy 0 µ i uR@u= R = uRγ γ PRuR; (9) 1 with PR = 2 (1 + γ5). Let us find out the values for the hypercharges for various fields. Since the hypercharge is associated with the U(1) group, they could be arbitrary real numbers. To find out what the actual hypercharges are in the Standard Model, we can use the known electric charges. First isolating the 3 neutral gauge bosons, Wµ and Bµ, and then changing to the (Aµ;Zµ) basis using the definitions we encountered earlier 3 Zµ ≡ cos θW Wµ − sin θW Bµ; 3 Aµ ≡ sin θW Wµ + cos θW Bµ; we get the following expression for the electron and neutrino couplings 1 1 L = ei − gW= 3 + g0Y B= ei + νi gW= 3 + gY B= νi L 2 L L L 2 L L 0 i i 0 i i + g YeeRBe= R + g YννRBν= R 1 1 = e − + Y ei Ae= i + + Y νi Aν= i + Y ei Ae= i + Y νi Aν= i + Z terms: (10) 2 L L L 2 L L L e R R ν R R Since the electric charges are the coefficients of the coupling to the photon, we can read off from this equation the relationship between hypercharges and electric charges. Using the convention that the electron is defined to have electric charge Q = −1, we see that 1 1 − + Y = Q = −1 =) Y = − : (11) 2 L L 2 It also gives Q = Ye = −1: (12) 1 1 i = i Now plugging in YL = − 2 in the term 2 + YL νLAνL in the above Lagrangian we see that νL must be neutral, which is in agreement with Nature. For νR to be neutral, we also need Yν = 0. 2 Similarly, using that the up quark has electric charge + 3 , and the down quark has electric charge 1 1 2 1 − 3 we need YQ = 6 , Yu = 3 , and Yd = − 3 . (See Table. 1.) It turns out that given the particle 2 / 6 PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 content of the Standard Model, the hypercharges must satisfy certain constraints. In particular the constraint YL + 3YQ = 0: (13) This forces the electric charge of the electron to be exactly three times the electric charge of the down quark and exactly opposite to the charge of the proton. νL uL Field L = eR νR Q = uR dR H eL dL SU(3) − − − − SU(2) − − − − 1 1 2 1 1 U(1)Y − 2 −1 0 6 3 − 3 2 Table 1: Hypercharges and group representations of the Standard Model fields. indicates that the field transforms in the fundamental representation, and − indicates that a field is unchanged. Charged and Neutral Currents To work out the physical consequences of the fermion-vector boson couplings, we should write the Lagrangian (suppressing the generation index i) L = L iD= L + eR iD= eR + QL iD= QL + uR iD= uR + dR iD= dR; (14) in terms of the vector-boson mass eigenstates, using the form of the covariant derivative g + + − − g 3 2 Dµ = @µ − ip Wµ T + Wµ T − i Zµ T − sin θW Q − ieAµQ: (15) 2 cos θW Then Eq. (14) takes the form L = L i@= L + eR i@= eR + QL i@= QL + uR i@= uR + dR i@= dR + µ+ − µ− 0 µ µ +g Wµ JW + Wµ JW + ZµJZ + eAµJEM; (16) where the charged currents are µ+ 1 µ µ J = p (νLγ eL + uLγ dL) ; (17) W 2 µ− 1 µ µ J = p eLγ νL + dLγ uL ; (18) W 2 3 / 6 PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 and the neutral currents are µ 1 h µ 1 µ 1 2 µ 2 JZ = νLγ νL + eLγ − + sin θW eL + eRγ sin θW eR cos θW 2 2 1 2 2 + u γµ − sin2 θ u + u γµ − sin2 θ u L 2 3 W L R 3 W R 1 1 1 i + d γµ − + sin2 θ d + d γµ sin2 θ d ; L 2 3 W L R 3 W R 2 1 J µ = eγµ (−1) e + uγµ + u + dγµ − d: (19) EM 3 3 In the above we have used 1 T ± = (σ1 ± iσ2) = σ± (20) 2 µ to simplify the W boson currents. Notice that JEM associated with the photon field is indeed the standard electromagnetic current. Fermion Mass Terms Let us discuss how fermion mass terms are generated in the electroweak theory. As anticipated, the Higgs boson plays a crucial role in giving mass to fermions. Before introducing the Higgs boson, we do not really have a left- and a right-handed electron, but rather two separate unrelated fields that happen to have the same electric charge. That is, fields eL and eR with electric charge Q = −1. In QED, left- and right-handed fermions are connected by a Dirac mass term: me = me L R + me R L: (21) However, in electroweak theory, a mass term like eLeR explicitly breaks the SU(2) invariance, and thus forbidden. This is the place where the Higgs boson comes to the rescue. To write down the electron mass terms, we can use the Higgs doublet; then the masses appear only after electroweak symmetry breaking. Let us look at the term YYukawa = −λf LΦeR + h:c: ! 0 = −λf (νL eL) eR + h:c: pv 2 v = −λf p eLeR + h:c:; (22) 2 where λf is the fermion coupling. After the Higgs field Φ gets a vacuum expectation value, a mass 4 / 6 PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 term will be generated: −me(eLeR + eReL), with λe me = p v: (23) 2 Following the similar path, we see that the charged leptons and the down-type quarks (d; s; b) will get masses, and no additional breaking of SU(2) is required. Since λe is a renormalizable coupling, it must be treated as an input to the theory. Thus the GWS theory allows the electron to be very light, but it cannot explain why the electron is so light compared to the charged force mediators, ± Wµ . ∗ To give masses to the remaining fermions, we can use the SU(2) invariant term Lσ2Φ . To see ∗ that Lσ2Φ is SU(2) invariant, we note that, since Φ and L are fundamentals under SU(2), we have the infinitesimal transformations 1 δΦ = iθ σ Φ; (24) 2 k k 1 δL = iθ σ L; (25) 2 k k giving 1 1 δ(Lσ Φ∗) = − iθ Lσ σ∗Φ∗ − iθ Lσyσ Φ∗ = 0: (26) 2 2 k 2 k 2 k k 2 To get Eq. (26) we have used ! ! T 0 −i 1 R σ2 R = ( 1 2) = −i( 1 2 − 2 1); (27) i 0 2 T σj σ2 + σ2σj = 0; (28) ∗ and σ2 = −σ2. Thus we define ∗ Φe ≡ iσ2Φ ; (29) 1 which transforms in the fundamental representation of SU(2) and has hypercharge − 2 . Then we can write −λf LΦeνR as a term that gives a mass to the neutrino (or the up-type quarks). Neutrino Masses in the Standard Model It is sometimes said that the Standard Model does not allow for the neutrino to have mass. This is not really true. As seen above, if the up-type quark can acquire mass through the Higgs mechanism, then neutrinos can as well. However, given that the observational constraints on the upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses is less than an electron-volt, this puts an upper limit on any of the neutrino coupling constants of −12 λν .
Recommended publications
  • Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model and Beyond Alessandra Edda Baas University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2010 Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model and Beyond Alessandra Edda Baas University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Part of the Physics Commons Baas, Alessandra Edda, "Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Higgs Mechanism in the Standard Model and Beyond" (2010). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 503. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/503 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE HIGGS MECHANISM IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND A Thesis Presented by ALESSANDRA EDDA BAAS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE September 2010 Department of Physics © Copyright by Alessandra Edda Baas 2010 All Rights Reserved THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE HIGGS MECHANISM IN THE STANDARD MODEL AND BEYOND A Thesis Presented by ALESSANDRA EDDA BAAS Approved as to style and content by: Eugene Golowich, Chair Benjamin Brau, Member Donald Candela, Department Chair Department of Physics To my loving parents. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing a Thesis is never possible without the help of many people. The greatest gratitude goes to my supervisor, Prof. Eugene Golowich who gave my the opportunity of working with him this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Physics Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 12: Hadron Decays
    Particle Physics Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 12: Hadron Decays !Resonances !Heavy Meson and Baryons !Decays and Quantum numbers !CKM matrix 1 Announcements •No lecture on Friday. •Remaining lectures: •Tuesday 13 March •Friday 16 March •Tuesday 20 March •Friday 23 March •Tuesday 27 March •Friday 30 March •Tuesday 3 April •Remaining Tutorials: •Monday 26 March •Monday 2 April 2 From Friday: Mesons and Baryons Summary • Quarks are confined to colourless bound states, collectively known as hadrons: " mesons: quark and anti-quark. Bosons (s=0, 1) with a symmetric colour wavefunction. " baryons: three quarks. Fermions (s=1/2, 3/2) with antisymmetric colour wavefunction. " anti-baryons: three anti-quarks. • Lightest mesons & baryons described by isospin (I, I3), strangeness (S) and hypercharge Y " isospin I=! for u and d quarks; (isospin combined as for spin) " I3=+! (isospin up) for up quarks; I3="! (isospin down) for down quarks " S=+1 for strange quarks (additive quantum number) " hypercharge Y = S + B • Hadrons display SU(3) flavour symmetry between u d and s quarks. Used to predict the allowed meson and baryon states. • As baryons are fermions, the overall wavefunction must be anti-symmetric. The wavefunction is product of colour, flavour, spin and spatial parts: ! = "c "f "S "L an odd number of these must be anti-symmetric. • consequences: no uuu, ddd or sss baryons with total spin J=# (S=#, L=0) • Residual strong force interactions between colourless hadrons propagated by mesons. 3 Resonances • Hadrons which decay due to the strong force have very short lifetime # ~ 10"24 s • Evidence for the existence of these states are resonances in the experimental data Γ2/4 σ = σ • Shape is Breit-Wigner distribution: max (E M)2 + Γ2/4 14 41.
    [Show full text]
  • The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories
    The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories John Baez and John Huerta Department of Mathematics University of California Riverside, CA 92521 USA May 4, 2010 Abstract The Standard Model is the best tested and most widely accepted theory of elementary particles we have today. It may seem complicated and arbitrary, but it has hidden patterns that are revealed by the relationship between three ‘grand unified theories’: theories that unify forces and particles by extend- ing the Standard Model symmetry group U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3) to a larger group. These three are Georgi and Glashow’s SU(5) theory, Georgi’s theory based on the group Spin(10), and the Pati–Salam model based on the group SU(2)×SU(2)×SU(4). In this expository account for mathematicians, we ex- plain only the portion of these theories that involves finite-dimensional group representations. This allows us to reduce the prerequisites to a bare minimum while still giving a taste of the profound puzzles that physicists are struggling to solve. 1 Introduction The Standard Model of particle physics is one of the greatest triumphs of physics. This theory is our best attempt to describe all the particles and all the forces of nature... except gravity. It does a great job of fitting experiments we can do in the lab. But physicists are dissatisfied with it. There are three main reasons. First, it leaves out gravity: that force is described by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, arXiv:0904.1556v2 [hep-th] 1 May 2010 which has not yet been reconciled with the Standard Model.
    [Show full text]
  • – 1– LEPTOQUARK QUANTUM NUMBERS Revised September
    {1{ LEPTOQUARK QUANTUM NUMBERS Revised September 2005 by M. Tanabashi (Tohoku University). Leptoquarks are particles carrying both baryon number (B) and lepton number (L). They are expected to exist in various extensions of the Standard Model (SM). The possible quantum numbers of leptoquark states can be restricted by assuming that their direct interactions with the ordinary SM fermions are dimensionless and invariant under the SM gauge group. Table 1 shows the list of all possible quantum numbers with this assumption [1]. The columns of SU(3)C,SU(2)W,andU(1)Y in Table 1 indicate the QCD representation, the weak isospin representation, and the weak hypercharge, respectively. The spin of a leptoquark state is taken to be 1 (vector leptoquark) or 0 (scalar leptoquark). Table 1: Possible leptoquarks and their quan- tum numbers. Spin 3B + L SU(3)c SU(2)W U(1)Y Allowed coupling c c 0 −2 311¯ /3¯qL`Loru ¯ReR c 0 −2 314¯ /3 d¯ReR c 0−2331¯ /3¯qL`L cµ c µ 1−2325¯ /6¯qLγeRor d¯Rγ `L cµ 1 −2 32¯ −1/6¯uRγ`L 00327/6¯qLeRoru ¯R`L 00321/6 d¯R`L µ µ 10312/3¯qLγ`Lor d¯Rγ eR µ 10315/3¯uRγeR µ 10332/3¯qLγ`L If we do not require leptoquark states to couple directly with SM fermions, different assignments of quantum numbers become possible [2,3]. The Pati-Salam model [4] is an example predicting the existence of a leptoquark state. In this model a vector lepto- quark appears at the scale where the Pati-Salam SU(4) “color” gauge group breaks into the familiar QCD SU(3)C group (or CITATION: S.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of a Hypercharge Axion in ATLAS
    Detection of a Hypercharge Axion in ATLAS a Monte-Carlo Simulation of a Pseudo-Scalar Particle (Hypercharge Axion) with Electroweak Interactions for the ATLAS Detector in the Large Hadron Collider at CERN Erik Elfgren [email protected] December, 2000 Division of Physics Lule˚aUniversity of Technology Lule˚a, SE-971 87, Sweden http://www.luth.se/depts/mt/fy/ Abstract This Master of Science thesis treats the hypercharge axion, which is a hy- pothetical pseudo-scalar particle with electroweak interactions. First, the theoretical context and the motivations for this study are discussed. In short, the hypercharge axion is introduced to explain the dominance of matter over antimatter in the universe and the existence of large-scale magnetic fields. Second, the phenomenological properties are analyzed and the distin- guishing marks are underlined. These are basically the products of photons and Z0swithhightransversemomentaandinvariantmassequaltothatof the axion. Third, the simulation is carried out with two photons producing the axion which decays into Z0s and/or photons. The event simulation is run through the simulator ATLFAST of ATLAS (A Toroidal Large Hadron Col- lider ApparatuS) at CERN. Finally, the characteristics of the axion decay are analyzed and the crite- ria for detection are presented. A study of the background is also included. The result is that for certain values of the axion mass and the mass scale (both in the order of a TeV), the hypercharge axion could be detected in ATLAS. Preface This is a Master of Science thesis at the Lule˚a University of Technology, Sweden. The research has been done at Universit´edeMontr´eal, Canada, under the supervision of Professor Georges Azuelos.
    [Show full text]
  • Electro-Weak Interactions
    Electro-weak interactions Marcello Fanti Physics Dept. | University of Milan M. Fanti (Physics Dep., UniMi) Fundamental Interactions 1 / 36 The ElectroWeak model M. Fanti (Physics Dep., UniMi) Fundamental Interactions 2 / 36 Electromagnetic vs weak interaction Electromagnetic interactions mediated by a photon, treat left/right fermions in the same way g M = [¯u (eγµ)u ] − µν [¯u (eγν)u ] 3 1 q2 4 2 1 − γ5 Weak charged interactions only apply to left-handed component: = L 2 Fermi theory (effective low-energy theory): GF µ 5 ν 5 M = p u¯3γ (1 − γ )u1 gµν u¯4γ (1 − γ )u2 2 Complete theory with a vector boson W mediator: g 1 − γ5 g g 1 − γ5 p µ µν p ν M = u¯3 γ u1 − 2 2 u¯4 γ u2 2 2 q − MW 2 2 2 g µ 5 ν 5 −−−! u¯3γ (1 − γ )u1 gµν u¯4γ (1 − γ )u2 2 2 low q 8 MW p 2 2 g −5 −2 ) GF = | and from weak decays GF = (1:1663787 ± 0:0000006) · 10 GeV 8 MW M. Fanti (Physics Dep., UniMi) Fundamental Interactions 3 / 36 Experimental facts e e Electromagnetic interactions γ Conserves charge along fermion lines ¡ Perfectly left/right symmetric e e Long-range interaction electromagnetic µ ) neutral mass-less mediator field A (the photon, γ) currents eL νL Weak charged current interactions Produces charge variation in the fermions, ∆Q = ±1 W ± Acts only on left-handed component, !! ¡ L u Short-range interaction L dL ) charged massive mediator field (W ±)µ weak charged − − − currents E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Flavour Physics
    Introduction to flavour physics Y. Grossman Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Abstract In this set of lectures we cover the very basics of flavour physics. The lec- tures are aimed to be an entry point to the subject of flavour physics. A lot of problems are provided in the hope of making the manuscript a self-study guide. 1 Welcome statement My plan for these lectures is to introduce you to the very basics of flavour physics. After the lectures I hope you will have enough knowledge and, more importantly, enough curiosity, and you will go on and learn more about the subject. These are lecture notes and are not meant to be a review. In the lectures, I try to talk about the basic ideas, hoping to give a clear picture of the physics. Thus many details are omitted, implicit assumptions are made, and no references are given. Yet details are important: after you go over the current lecture notes once or twice, I hope you will feel the need for more. Then it will be the time to turn to the many reviews [1–10] and books [11, 12] on the subject. I try to include many homework problems for the reader to solve, much more than what I gave in the actual lectures. If you would like to learn the material, I think that the problems provided are the way to start. They force you to fully understand the issues and apply your knowledge to new situations. The problems are given at the end of each section.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 231A Problem Set Number 8 Due Wednesday, November 24, 2004 Note: Some Problems May Be “Review” for Some of You. I Am
    Physics 231a Problem Set Number 8 Due Wednesday, November 24, 2004 Note: Some problems may be “review” for some of you. I am deliberately including problems which are potentially in this category. If the material of the problem is already well-known to you, such that doing the problem would not be instructive, just write “been there, done that”, or suitable equivalent, for that problem, and I’ll give you credit. 40. Standard Model Review(?): Last week you considered the mass matrix and Z coupling for the neutral gauge bosons in the electroweak theory. Let us discuss a little more completely the couplings of the electroweak gauge bosons to fermions. Again, we’ll work in the standard model where the physical Z and photon (A) states are mixtures of neutral gauge bosons. We start with gauge groups “SU(2)L”and“U(1)Y ”. The gauge bosons of SU(2)L are the W1,W2,W3, all with only left-handed coupling to fermions. The U(1)Y gauge boson is denoted B. The Z and A fields are the mixtures: A = B cos θW + W3 sin θW (48) Z = −B sin θW + W3 cos θW , (49) where θW is the “weak mixing angle”. The Lagrangian contains interaction terms with fermions of the form: 1 1 L = −gf¯ γµ τ · W f − g0f¯ YB ψ, (50) int L 2 µ L 2 µ ≡ 1 − 5 · ≡ 3 where fL 2 (1 γ )ψ, τ Wµ Pi=1 τiWµi, τ are the Pauli matrices acting on weak SU(2)L fermion doublets, Y is the weak hypercharge 0 operator, and g and g are the interaction strengths for the SU(2)L and U(1)Y components, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaon to Two Pions Decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I = 1/2 Rule and CP
    Kaon to Two Pions decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I =1/2 rule and CP violation Qi Liu Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 c 2012 Qi Liu All Rights Reserved Abstract Kaon to Two Pions decays from Lattice QCD: ∆I =1/2 rule and CP violation Qi Liu We report a direct lattice calculation of the K to ππ decay matrix elements for both the ∆I = 1/2 and 3/2 amplitudes A0 and A2 on a 2+1 flavor, domain wall fermion, 163 32 16 lattice ensemble and a 243 64 16 lattice ensemble. This × × × × is a complete calculation in which all contractions for the required ten, four-quark operators are evaluated, including the disconnected graphs in which no quark line connects the initial kaon and final two-pion states. These lattice operators are non- perturbatively renormalized using the Rome-Southampton method and the quadratic divergences are studied and removed. This is an important but notoriously difficult calculation, requiring high statistics on a large volume. In this work we take a major step towards the computation of the physical K ππ amplitudes by performing → a complete calculation at unphysical kinematics with pions of mass 422MeV and 329MeV at rest in the kaon rest frame. With this simplification we are able to 3 resolve Re(A0) from zero for the first time, with a 25% statistical error on the 16 3 lattice and 15% on the 24 lattice. The complex amplitude A2 is calculated with small statistical errors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eightfold Way John C
    The Eightfold Way John C. Baez, May 27 2003 It is natural to group the eight lightest mesons into 4 irreps of isospin SU(2) as follows: mesons I3 Y Q pions (complexified adjoint rep) π+ +1 0 +1 π0 0 0 0 π− -1 0 -1 kaons (defining rep) K+ +1/2 1 +1 K0 -1/2 1 0 antikaons (dual of defining rep) K0 +1/2 -1 0 K− -1/2 -1 -1 eta (trivial rep) η 0 0 0 (The dual of the defining rep of SU(2) is isomorphic to the defining rep, but it's always nice to think of antiparticles as living in the dual of the rep that the corresponding particles live in, so above I have said that the antikaons live in the dual of the defining rep.) In his theory called the Eightfold Way, Gell-Mann showed that these eight mesons could be thought of as a basis for the the complexified adjoint rep of SU(3) | that is, its rep on the 8- dimensional complex Hilbert space su(3) C = sl(3; C): ⊗ ∼ He took seriously the fact that 3 3 sl(3; C) C[3] = C (C )∗ ⊂ ∼ ⊗ 3 3 where C is the defining rep of SU(3) and (C )∗ is its dual. Thus, he postulated particles called quarks forming the standard basis of C3: 1 0 0 u = 0 0 1 ; d = 0 1 1 ; s = 0 0 1 ; @ 0 A @ 0 A @ 1 A 3 and antiquarks forming the dual basis of (C )∗: u = 1 0 0 ; d = 0 1 0 ; s = 0 0 1 : This let him think of the eight mesons as being built from quarks and antiquarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Masses-How to Add Them to the Standard Model
    he Oscillating Neutrino The Oscillating Neutrino of spatial coordinates) has the property of interchanging the two states eR and eL. Neutrino Masses What about the neutrino? The right-handed neutrino has never been observed, How to add them to the Standard Model and it is not known whether that particle state and the left-handed antineutrino c exist. In the Standard Model, the field ne , which would create those states, is not Stuart Raby and Richard Slansky included. Instead, the neutrino is associated with only two types of ripples (particle states) and is defined by a single field ne: n annihilates a left-handed electron neutrino n or creates a right-handed he Standard Model includes a set of particles—the quarks and leptons e eL electron antineutrino n . —and their interactions. The quarks and leptons are spin-1/2 particles, or weR fermions. They fall into three families that differ only in the masses of the T The left-handed electron neutrino has fermion number N = +1, and the right- member particles. The origin of those masses is one of the greatest unsolved handed electron antineutrino has fermion number N = 21. This description of the mysteries of particle physics. The greatest success of the Standard Model is the neutrino is not invariant under the parity operation. Parity interchanges left-handed description of the forces of nature in terms of local symmetries. The three families and right-handed particles, but we just said that, in the Standard Model, the right- of quarks and leptons transform identically under these local symmetries, and thus handed neutrino does not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminosity Determination and Searches for Supersymmetric Sleptons and Gauginos at the ATLAS Experiment Anders Floderus
    Luminosity determination and searches for supersymmetric sleptons and gauginos at the ATLAS experiment Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Anders Floderus CERN-THESIS-2014-241 30/01/2015 DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS LUND, 2014 Abstract This thesis documents my work in the luminosity and supersymmetry groups of the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The theory of supersymmetry and the concept of luminosity are introduced. The ATLAS experiment is described with special focus on a luminosity monitor called LUCID. A data- driven luminosity calibration method is presented and evaluated using the LUCID detector. This method allows the luminosity measurement to be calibrated for arbitrary inputs. A study of particle counting using LUCID is then presented. The charge deposited by particles passing through the detector is shown to be directly proportional to the luminosity. Finally, a search for sleptons and gauginos in final states −1 with exactly two oppositely charged leptons is presented. The search is based onp 20.3 fb of pp collision data recorded with the ATLAS detector in 2012 at a center-of-mass energy of s = 8 TeV. No significant excess over the Standard Model expectation is observed. Instead, limits are set on the slepton and gaugino masses. ii Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning Partikelfysiken är studien av naturens minsta beståndsdelar — De så kallade elementarpartiklarna. All materia i universum består av elementarpartiklar. Den teori som beskriver vilka partiklar som finns och hur de uppför sig heter Standardmodellen. Teorin har historiskt sett varit mycket framgångsrik. Den har gång på gång förutspått existensen av nya partiklar innan de kunnat påvisas experimentellt, och klarar av att beskriva många experimentella resultat med imponerande precision.
    [Show full text]