DOCSLIB.ORG

North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study Final Report June 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study Final Report June 2010 North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study Final Report June 2010 North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study Final Report June 2010 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Cambridgeshire County Council’s information and use in relation to the North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study . Atkins Transport Planning & Management assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document History JOB NUMBER: 5092812 DOCUMENT REF: Final Report -v11.docx 4 Final Draft NP - - RSB 30/6/10 3 Second Draft NP - JML RSB 11/6/10 2 Draft Report for issue NP SA JML RSB 14/5/10 1 First Draft NP RSB, JML - 10/5/10 Revision Purpose Description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date 5092812/Copy of Final Report-v11.docx North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study – Final Report Contents Section Page List of Abbreviations iv Glossary v Executive Summary vii 1. Introduction 1 Background 1 This Study 2 Structure of the Report 3 2. Technical Approach 4 Introduction 4 Applicability of Existing Models 4 Gravity Model 5 Inputs and Assumptions 7 Details of the Gravity Model 9 Feedback to the CSRM 15 Summary of the Technical Approach 16 3. Gravity Model Forecasts 17 Introduction 17 Mode Share 20 Shopping Trip Costs 22 Abstraction from Existing Major Stores 23 Level of Internalisation 24 Shopping Destinations across the Wider Catchment Area 25 Summary of the Gravity Model Forecasts 38 4. Cambridge Sub-Regional Model Forecasts 39 Introduction 39 Summary Statistics 39 Performance of Key Junctions 45 Analysis of Pass-By Trips 49 Summary of the CSRM Forecasts 50 5. Summary and Findings 51 Summary 51 Qualitative Discussion 52 Findings 53 Further Work 53 5092812/Copy of Final Report-v11.docx i North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study – Final Report List of Tables Table 2.1 – Input Data 7 Table 2.2 – Number of Trips to each Major Food Store 13 Table 2.3 – Car Mode Shares for Major Food Stores in Cambridge based on SOLUTIONS Study 15 Table 3.1 – Percentage Mode Share by Car and Car Person Trips for NWC Stores 21 Table 3.2 – Daily Average Trip Costs (pence), All Modes 22 Table 3.3 – Percentage of Trips t o New Stores from within SRS Primary Catchment Area 24 Table 3.4 – Percentage of Trips to New Stores from within NWC 24 Table 4.1 – SATURN Model Statistics for SRS Primary Catchment Area (all vehicle trips) 42 Table 4.2 – SATURN Mo del Statistics for SRS Secondary Catchment Area (all vehicle trips) 43 Table 4.3 – SATURN Model Statistics for Cambridge Urban Area (all vehicle trips) 44 Table 4.4 – AM Peak Delays at Key Junctions (Seconds per PCU) 46 Table 4.5 – Inter Peak Delays at Key Junctions (Seconds per PCU) 47 Table 4.6 – PM Peak Delays at Key Junctions (Seconds per PCU) 48 Table 4.7 – Two-Way PCU Flows on Radial Routes in Planned Development Only Model 49 Table 4.8 – Approximate Road Distance from Stores to Adjacent Radial Routes 49 Table 4.9 – Pass-By Potential of Stores 49 Table 5.1 – Analysis of Tests by Key NWC Transport Objectives 52 List of Figures Figure 1.1 – Development Site Locations 1 Figure 2.1 – Illust ration of Different Housing Distributions 5 Figure 2.2 – Flow Diagram showing CSRM and Gravity Model Interaction 6 Figure 2.3 – Postcode Areas in Cambridge 8 Figure 2.4 – Study Catchment Area 10 Figure 2.5 – Modelled and Observed Trip Cost Distributions 12 Figure 2.6 – Number of Trips to each Major Food Store 13 Figure 3.1 – Major Food Store Location Plan 18 Figure 3.2 – Food Store Locations and Sizes (m 2 GFA), Planned Development Only 18 Figure 3.3 – Food Store Locations and Sizes (m 2 GFA), Test Scenarios 19 Figure 3.4 – Abstraction from Existing Stores 23 Figure 3.5 – Test 1 Shopping Destinations, Wide Area 26 Figure 3.6 – Test 1 Shopping Destinations, Local Area 27 Figure 3.7 – Test 2 Shopping Destinations, Wide Area 28 Figure 3.8 – Test 2 Shopping Destinations, Local Area 29 Figure 3.9 – Test 3 Shopping Destinations, Wide Area 30 Figure 3.10 – Test 3 Shopping Destinations, Local Area 31 Figure 3.11 – Test 4 Shopping Destinations, Wide Area 32 Figure 3.12 – Test 4 Shopping Destinations, Local Area 33 Figure 3.13 – Test 5 Shopping Destinations, Wide Area 34 Figure 3.14 – Test 5 Shopping Destinations, Local Area 35 Figure 3.15 – Test 6 Shopping Destinations, Wide Area 36 Figure 3.16 – Test 6 Shopping Destinations, Local Area 37 Figure 4.1 – Cambridge Urban Area Definition 41 Figure 4.2 – Key Junction Locations 45 5092812/Copy of Final Report-v11.docx ii North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study – Final Report Appendices Appendix A – Modelled Scenarios 55 A.1 The Dwelling Scenarios 56 A.2 The Retail Scenarios 56 List of Tables Table A.1 – Dwelling Assumptions 56 Table A.2 – NWC Retail Pr ovision in the Base (2008) Scenario 57 Table A.3 – NWC Additional Retail Provision in Planned Development Only (2021) over Base (2008) 57 Table A.4 – NWC Additional Retail Provision in Test 1 (2021) over Base (2008) 57 Table A.5 – NWC Additional Retail Provision in Test 2 (2021) over Base (2008) 57 Table A.6 – NWC A dditional Retail Provision in Test 3 (2021) over Base (2008) 57 Table A.7 – NWC Additional Retail Provision in Test 4 (2021) over Base (2008) 58 Table A.8 – NWC Additional Retail Provision in Test 5 (2021) over Base (2008) 58 Table A.9 – NWC Additional Retail Provision in Test 6 (2021) over Base (2008) 58 Table A.10 – Net Increase in Food Store Provision over Planned Development Only Scenario 58 List of Figures Figure A.1 – Development Map 59 5092812/Copy of Final Report-v11.docx iii North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study – Final Report List of Abbreviations CCC Cambridgeshire County Council CCRG Cambridgeshire County Research Group CO 2 Carbon dioxide CSRM Cambridge Sub-Regional Model DfT Department for Transport GFA Gross Floor Area (measured in square metres) NLP Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners NWC North-West Cambridge (consisting of University, NIAB, NIAB Extra and Orchard Park sites) PCA Primary Catchment Area (as defined in the SRS) PCU Passenger Car Unit RFA Ret ail Floor Area (measured in square metres) SCA Secondary Catchment Area (as defined in the SRS) SCDC South Cambridgeshire District Council SOLUTIONS Sustainability Of Land Use and Transport In Outer Neighbourhoods SRS Supplementary Retail Study TIF Transpo rt Innovation Fund TRICS Trip Rate Information Computer System WebTAG Web-based Transport Analysis Guidance 5092812/Copy of Final Report-v11.docx iv North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study – Final Report Glossary Base case The “starting position” for modelling. In this study, the base year is 2008 and the base case includes everything that had bee n built by that year (roads, houses, etc.). CSRM The Cambridge Sub -Regional Model is a transport and land use interaction model that was originally built for the TIF study according to the latest DfT guidelines. It has a base year of 2006 and forecast years of 2011, 2016, 2021, 2026 and 2031, with the predicted interim/complete states of all developments fed into each forecast year. Generalised cost Generalised cost is a combination of travel time a nd distance, expressed as a monetary cost in pence based on DfT valuations of the cost of time for personal travel as well as fuel and non -fuel elements of travel costs. Gravity model In transport modelling, a gravity m odel provides a means of distributing trips between origins and destinations, based on the ‘production potential’ of origins, the attractiveness of destinations, and the cost of travelling between the two. As its name suggests, it is based on an analogy with the law of gravity in physics, whereby the gravitational ‘pull’ of an object decreases with distance from it, and is dependent on the size of the object. In the context of this study, the ‘production potential’ of origins describes the number of households and their propensit y to go shopping in the study area; the attractiveness of destinations is based on the store size; and the cost of travel is expressed in generalised cost (see above). Major food store A food store of 2800 m 2 GFA or more. Minor food store A food store of less than 2800 m 2 GFA. Mode share Mode share describes the proportion of trips travelling by each mode of transport. For example, the car mode share is the proportion of trips that are made by car. Pass-by trip A pass -by trip is one that is made en rou te between two other places. For example, somebody might call in at a supermarket on their way home from work. These trips in themselves do not cause additional traffic to enter the road network (although they may involve a detour). PCU Vehicular data f rom the SATURN models is in Passenger Car Units, rather than pure vehicles. For example, an HGV is counted as 2.3 PCUs, while a car is 1 PCU. This is due to the way the SATURN model represents the additional road space required by larger vehicles on the network. Planned Development Only This describes the future year scenario when only the development that is currently planned in NWC has been put in place. This is as opposed to the 5092812/Copy of Final Report-v11.docx v North West Cambridge Retail Transport Study – Final Report Test Scenarios, when additional food store floorspace is included to tes t the effects of these changes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APCM Booklet 090317 Bright 3.Pmd
    The Parish of Saint Andrew with Saint Etheldreda, Histon There are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who activates all of them in everyone. REPORTS ON CHURCH LIFE Annual Parochial Church Meeting 2017 Credits Front cover, clockwise from top left: Table Talk, after church, Julie Whitbread making a cappuccino (David Wilson), Factory Rock Holiday Club (Tim Blake), Stepping Stones Playgroup (Tim Blake), flower arranging (Jo Roach) Back cover, clockwise from top left: SJ Club (Tim Blake), coffee after church, The Saint Andrew’s Centre (David Wilson), care home service (Elaine Ife), parish horizon (Peter Oakes), Open the Book (Tim Blake) Inside pages: Tim Blake (credits page; 21–23), Rachel Carr (14), Jonathan Chatfield (12), Olivia Coles (13, 15), Chris Cox (28), CPAS (31), Paul and Penny Glass (16), Paul and Janey Hames (30), Elaine Ife (11), Jo Roach (9, 18, 19), Barry Starling (2), David Wilson (3), Lorna Wood (24, 25, 29, 32), Peter Wood (33), Ruari Wood (26) Bible references on the cover: 1Corinthians 12: 6, 25 (NRSV) Print-Out are thanked for their invaluable help and advice in the production of this booklet. The purpose of this booklet is threefold: to raise awareness of the great range of activities in our church; to enable us to encourage one another; and to provide an impetus for prayer over the coming months. The prayer points in the margin give a quick reference to more detail within the text to enliven one’s prayers. The booklet opens with reports required by law to be presented at the APCM and then emphasises the central place of prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Cambridge Planning Policy Update
    Greater Cambridge Planning Policy Update (Last updated 1 February 2020) This monthly update covers the Greater Cambridge area. The planning departments for South Cambridgeshire District Council and Cambridge City Council have been combined to form the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning service which serve this area. This update gives information on: • Live planning related consultations in Greater Cambridge, comprising South Cambridgeshire and Cambridge, to help you have your say. • Forthcoming planning related consultations in Greater Cambridge. • Other key planning news at local, county and national levels. Information on any consultations that may affect people living or working in Greater Cambridge can be viewed on the South Cambridgeshire District Council consultations webpage and / or the Cambridge City Council consultations webpage as relevant to the consultation concerned. Current Consultations by the Councils Greater Cambridge Local Plan Consultation on the Greater Cambridge Local Plan – The First Conversation runs until 24 February 2020. For more information on this consultation see the Local Plan section of this update below. Current Consultations by others Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan Waterbeach Parish Council has started the pre-submission consultation on its neighbourhood plan. Comments should be sent to the parish council. For more information on this consultation visit the dedicated website for the Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan. The deadline for comments is 24 February 2020. Network Rail consultation on new railway station for Cambridge South Network Rail launched a public consultation on proposals for a new railway station for Cambridge South. Public consultation began on 20 January 2020 and will close on 2 March 2020. Madingley Road cycling and walking improvements The Greater Cambridge Partnership has begun a seven-week consultation for people to give their opinions on two options to significantly upgrade walking and cycling journeys along the Madingley Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations - Eastern Region
    Final recommendations - Eastern region Contents 1. Initial proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Bedfordshire p10, recommendations p11 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Norfolk Cambridgeshire p12, recommendations p13 Hertfordshire p14, recommendations p15 Norfolk p15, recommendations p16 3. Campaigns p4 8. Sub-region 3: Essex p17, recommendations p18 4. Major issues p5 9. Sub-region 4: Suffolk p19, recommendations p20 5. Final proposals recommendations p7 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The Eastern region was allocated 57 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of one from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Bedfordshire 6 6 6 Cambridgeshire, 27 27 27 Hertfordshire and Norfolk Essex 18 17 17 Suffolk 7 7 7 2. Under the initial proposals six of the existing 58 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals continued to retain six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies that crossed county boundaries - one between Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, and one between Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire. In Suffolk, Bedfordshire and Essex it was possible to allocate a whole number of constituencies to each county. 1 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation the Commission received over 2,000 representations regarding the Eastern region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● The proposed constituency of North East Hertfordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Until Signed Minutes of Madingley Parish Council (MPC
    Draft until signed Minutes of Madingley Parish Council (MPC) Meeting Monday 9th September at 7.30pm, Madingley Village Hall Present: R Crichton-Stuart (RCS) (Chair), J Stevenson-Hinde (JSH) (Vice-Chair), F Naughton (FN) (Councillor), Attending: S Etherington-Meech (SEM) (Clerk/RFO), Cllr D De Lacey (DDL), Cllr T Bygott (TB) (District Councillor), 7 members of the public 1. Election of chairman and signing of acceptance of office JSH (Vice-Chair) opened the meeting and announced the resignation of Cllr David Ousby (due to conflict of interest working for South Cambs District Council (SCDC) – Davis Ousby advised that he could no longer be a parish councillor at the same time as his current role at SCDC as it would be politically restricted) from MPC a new chair was to be elected, JSH requested nominations for chair. FN proposed RCS for chair and JSH seconded and RCS signed his acceptance of office as chair to MPC – RESOLVED. RCS thanked David Ousby for his service to MPC. Action – Clerk to post notice of vacancy with SCDC and in noticeboards. 2. Apologies for absence and declarations of interest/dispensations No apologises received. RCS declared an interest in item 9. b) i) – Decisions received from SCDC – Brook Cottage. 3. Public Forum The public wanted to acknowledge the work that David Ousby had contributed whilst he was a member of MPC, advising that he had been a pleasure to work alongside with a wealth of knowledge and noted his contribution to the Greenways Vision for the parish. Further to the parish council meeting in July a member of the public advised that farm vehicles are still travelling through the village and wanted to question as to why Park Farm are no longer using the track that they had previously used and when they spoke to Peter Wilderspin at the end of July he thought they would stop in a day or two, however, farm traffic has continued through the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing, Credit and Brexit
    Housing, Credit and Brexit Ben Ansell∗ Abstract Dozens of articles have been drafted attempting to explain the narrow vic- tory for the Leave campaign in Britain’s EU referendum in June 2016. Yet, hitherto, and despite a general interest in ‘Left Behind’ commentary, few writ- ers have drawn attention to the connection between the Brexit vote and the distribution of British housing costs. This memo examines the connection be- tween house prices and both aggregate voting during the EU referendum and individual vote intention beforehand. I find a very strong connection at the local authority, ward, and individual level between house prices and support for the Remain campaign, one that even holds up within regions and local authorities. Preliminary analysis suggests that housing values reflect long-run social differences that are just as manifest in attitudes to immigration as Brexit. Local ‘ecologies of unease’ (Reeves and Gimpel, 2012) appear a crucial force behind Brexit. This is a short memo on housing, credit and Brexit to be presented at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 2017. ∗Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions, Nuffield College, University of Oxford. [email protected]. My acknowledgements and thanks go to Jane Gingrich for the provision of local economic and housing data. 1 1 Introduction If there is one saving grace of Brexit for the British higher education system it is a boom of Brexit studies that began pouring forth as the dust settled on June 24th 2016. Most scholars have coalesced around an understanding of Brexit that to some extent mirrors that implicit in Theresa May’s quasi hard Brexit strategy - Brexit was caused by both economic and cultural forces, with opposition to the European Union based on concerns about immigration and of declining cultural and social status rather than economic deprivation or actual migration levels per se (Kaufmann, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Orchard-Park-Design-Guidance-Spd
    South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework Orchard Park Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environmental Assessment Adoption Statement Introduction South Cambridgeshire District Council adopted the Local Development Framework (LDF) Orchard Park Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on 8 March 2011. This statement has been prepared in accordance with the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (16) (3) and (4), which require a statement to be produced on adoption of a plan or programme, to detail: 1. How environmental considerations have been integrated into the plan or programme; 2. How the Environmental Report has been taken into account; 3. How opinions expressed through public consultation have been taken into account; 4. The reasons for choosing the plan or programme as adopted, in the light of the other reasonable alternatives dealt with; 5. The measures that are to be taken to monitor the significant environmental effects of the implementation of the plan or programme. Planning Policy Statement 12 widens these considerations from environmental, to broader sustainability issues, so that this statement provides information on the wider sustainability appraisal process. This statement examines each of these points in turn. Orchard Park Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environmental Assessment Adoption Statement 1 1. How sustainability considerations have been integrated into the plan
    [Show full text]
  • 'For Referendum' Version of the Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan
    Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan 2020 - 2031 Version 4: Referendum version Foreword Neighbourhood Plans were introduced through the Localism Act in 2011 (then referred to as “Neighbourhood Development Plans”). This gives a community the right to develop a plan for their neighbourhood that sets out policies on the development and use of land. Through the development of a Neighbourhood Plan, communities can play a greater role in the development of their area. Once made, Neighbourhood Plans form part of the statutory development plan and this means that South Cambridgeshire District Council must use our Neighbourhood Plan to determine planning applications. The Plan provides local people with the opportunity to have control over where development should go and how it can benefit the community. Histon and Impington are thriving villages where people value the rural feel, the wealth of amenities and being part of a community that is inclusive and diverse. The community wants to have a say in how land is used within the parish, how the villages develop and how to retain what is important to the community. We are situated close to Cambridge, an area where growth has been promoted and there is a need for increased housing as the population and the economy grows. People clearly told us through the consultation that retaining the villages’ distinctive identity and not becoming a suburb of Cambridge is a priority. The Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan has been developed by and with the community. It has been produced by the Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan Team, led by Histon and Impington Parish Council, using the views and ideas of those living, working and other stakeholders with an interest in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • South Cambs • ZONDER • a Transport Directory
    N T IET RBY South Cambs • ZONDER • A Transport Directory www.scambs.gov.uk Introduction This guide is designed to give information on the public and community transport schemes and providers operating in South Cambridgeshire. We want to increase awareness of what is available and to enable people to contact providers. We are keen to offer choice to the public and encourage the use of all types of public and community transport. The Traveline East Anglia website: www.travelinesoutheast.org.uk, provides comprehensive information for all local public transport services. It also offers door- to-door journey planning across the whole of England, Scotland and Wales. To go to the traveline site for another region please go to: www.traveline.info Train operators For timetables and other information call National Rail Enquiries on 0345 748 4950 or visit www.nationalrail.co.uk. Disabled passengers: how to make arrangements for assistance with rail travel. If you would like assistance when making a journey, such as help getting on or off a train, or ramps for a wheelchair, please contact the train company that manages the station you are starting your journey from. If your journey involves a Network Rail station please contact the train company you are starting your journey with. Please try and give a minimum of 24 hours notice before your journey as this will allow time for any special arrangements to be made. If this is not possible the train companies will still do their best to help, but cannot guarantee to provide their normal level of service.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Region
    Eastern region Initial proposals Contents Initial proposals summary .............................................................................. 3 1. What is the Boundary Commission for England? ........... 5 2. Background to the 2013 Review ...................................................... 6 3. Initial proposals for the Eastern region .................................... 9 Initial proposals for the Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire sub-region ............................ 10 Initial proposals for the Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, and Suffolk sub-region ................ 12 Initial proposals for the Essex sub-region ............................................................................... 13 4. How to have your say ................................................................................. 16 Annex: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates ........................................................................................ 19 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 3 9 Initial proposals summary Who we are and what we do region is determined by the electorate of the combined local authorities. The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing Sub-region Existing Proposed Parliamentary constituency boundaries in allocation allocation England. Bedfordshire and 17 16 Hertfordshire 2013 Review Cambridgeshire, 23 23 We have the
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2 Coarse Screening – Report
    Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Stage 2 - Coarse Screening Report 1 July 2020 Page intentionally blank for pagination when printed Mott MacDonald 22 Station Road Cambridge CB1 2JD United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 mottmac.com Anglian Water Services Ltd Lancaster House Ermine Business Park Cambridge Waste Water Lancaster Way Huntingdon Treatment Plant Relocation PE29 6XU Stage 2 - Coarse Screening Report 1 July 2020 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Page intentionally blank for pagination when printed Mott MacDonald | Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Stage 2 - Coarse Screening Report Document reference: 409071 | 03 | C.4 Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epo rt h as b een pre par ed s olely fo r us e by the par ty which co mmissio ned i t (t he ‘Clien t’) in conn ectio n with t he c aptio ned pr oject.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Persons Nominated
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED Election of Parish Councillors Arrington Parish Council The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Parish Councillor for Arrington Reason why no longer Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) nominated* 10 Hillside Lane, DESMOND Arrington, Royston, Andrew SG8 0BZ Rose Cottage, 88 KASZAK Ermine Way, Arrington, Martin Cambs, SG8 0AH 9A Church Lane, O`KEEFE Arrington, South Cambs, Independent Darren Anthony SG8 0BD 4 Newell Close, PEARCE Arrington, Cambs, Debbie SG8 0AZ 51 Ermine Way, SIUDAK Arrington, Nr Royston, Yvonne Leonie Hertfordshire, SG8 0AG *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Date: Friday 8 April 2016 Jean Hunter Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, South Cambridgeshire Hall, Cambourne Business Park, Cambourne, Cambridge, CB23 6EA STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED Election of Parish Councillors Cambourne Parish Council The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Parish Councillor for Cambourne Reason why no longer Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) nominated* 24 Foxhollow, Great CROCKER Cambourne, Cambridge, Simon Nicholas CB23 5HW 20 Brookfield Way, GAVIGAN Lower Cambourne, Patrick James Cambridgeshire, CB23 5ED 108 Greenhaze Lane, HUDSON Great Cambourne, Tom CB23 5BH 38, Lancaster Gate, MEHBOOB Upper Cambourne, Ghazala CB23 6AT 3 Langate Green, Great O`DWYER Cambourne, Cambridge, Joseph CB23 5AE 1 Whitley Road, Upper PATEL Cambourne, Jey Cambridgeshire, CB23 6AS 5, Chervil Way, Great POULTON Cambourne, Ruth Cambridgeshire, CB23 6BA SAWFORD 139 Jeavons Lane, Jeni Cambourne, CB23 5FA 14 Spar Close, Lower THOMPSON Cambourne, Greg Robert Cambridgeshire, CB23 6FG *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • OPCC Mag Spring 2019 Low
    ORCHARD PARK Community News Keep me for future reference ORCHARD PARK COMMUNITY COUNCIL Spring 2019 Spring 2019 - Orchard Park Community News 1 About Orchard Park Community Council A ‘Community Council’ is another name for a Parish or Town Council – the first and most local level of government closest to the people and representing the concerns of the local community. It is an elected local For matters regarding the authority with nine councillors that Community Council: represents Orchard Park. It tries hard [email protected] to punch above its weight. It works closely with South Cambridgeshire Community Centre and Sports Facilities to announce that we shall be District Council and the County Booking enquires: providing space for advertising. Council but is separate from them. www.orchardpark.gov.uk/bookings Editorial Please get in contact for more General enquires and booking: information on advertising rates. 2 About and Contact Information [email protected] elcome to our Spring If you have any news or 3 Editorial newsletter for 2019. It something you’d like promoted, The Orchard Community Centre contains updates from please let us know. 4 From the Chair of the Community Council Central Avenue W Orchard Park Community Cambridge This newsletter is produced by It5 Meet is funded your Community by a “precept” Councillors part of the CB4 2EZ Council (OPCC) and the latest council tax as well as income from the news in our community. Orchard Park Community community6 District Councillor centre Information and sports ground 01223 420750 Council and is distributed to all as well as initial funding from developers.8 County Councillor It owns Report and runs most of We employ a number of staff households and businesses in the open space and play areas within W W W www.orchardpark.gov.uk including a teamof caretakers Orchard Park.
    [Show full text]