OPCC Mag Spring 2019 Low
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
APCM Booklet 090317 Bright 3.Pmd
The Parish of Saint Andrew with Saint Etheldreda, Histon There are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who activates all of them in everyone. REPORTS ON CHURCH LIFE Annual Parochial Church Meeting 2017 Credits Front cover, clockwise from top left: Table Talk, after church, Julie Whitbread making a cappuccino (David Wilson), Factory Rock Holiday Club (Tim Blake), Stepping Stones Playgroup (Tim Blake), flower arranging (Jo Roach) Back cover, clockwise from top left: SJ Club (Tim Blake), coffee after church, The Saint Andrew’s Centre (David Wilson), care home service (Elaine Ife), parish horizon (Peter Oakes), Open the Book (Tim Blake) Inside pages: Tim Blake (credits page; 21–23), Rachel Carr (14), Jonathan Chatfield (12), Olivia Coles (13, 15), Chris Cox (28), CPAS (31), Paul and Penny Glass (16), Paul and Janey Hames (30), Elaine Ife (11), Jo Roach (9, 18, 19), Barry Starling (2), David Wilson (3), Lorna Wood (24, 25, 29, 32), Peter Wood (33), Ruari Wood (26) Bible references on the cover: 1Corinthians 12: 6, 25 (NRSV) Print-Out are thanked for their invaluable help and advice in the production of this booklet. The purpose of this booklet is threefold: to raise awareness of the great range of activities in our church; to enable us to encourage one another; and to provide an impetus for prayer over the coming months. The prayer points in the margin give a quick reference to more detail within the text to enliven one’s prayers. The booklet opens with reports required by law to be presented at the APCM and then emphasises the central place of prayer. -
Greater Cambridge Planning Policy Update
Greater Cambridge Planning Policy Update (Last updated 1 February 2020) This monthly update covers the Greater Cambridge area. The planning departments for South Cambridgeshire District Council and Cambridge City Council have been combined to form the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning service which serve this area. This update gives information on: • Live planning related consultations in Greater Cambridge, comprising South Cambridgeshire and Cambridge, to help you have your say. • Forthcoming planning related consultations in Greater Cambridge. • Other key planning news at local, county and national levels. Information on any consultations that may affect people living or working in Greater Cambridge can be viewed on the South Cambridgeshire District Council consultations webpage and / or the Cambridge City Council consultations webpage as relevant to the consultation concerned. Current Consultations by the Councils Greater Cambridge Local Plan Consultation on the Greater Cambridge Local Plan – The First Conversation runs until 24 February 2020. For more information on this consultation see the Local Plan section of this update below. Current Consultations by others Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan Waterbeach Parish Council has started the pre-submission consultation on its neighbourhood plan. Comments should be sent to the parish council. For more information on this consultation visit the dedicated website for the Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan. The deadline for comments is 24 February 2020. Network Rail consultation on new railway station for Cambridge South Network Rail launched a public consultation on proposals for a new railway station for Cambridge South. Public consultation began on 20 January 2020 and will close on 2 March 2020. Madingley Road cycling and walking improvements The Greater Cambridge Partnership has begun a seven-week consultation for people to give their opinions on two options to significantly upgrade walking and cycling journeys along the Madingley Road. -
Final Recommendations - Eastern Region
Final recommendations - Eastern region Contents 1. Initial proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Bedfordshire p10, recommendations p11 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Norfolk Cambridgeshire p12, recommendations p13 Hertfordshire p14, recommendations p15 Norfolk p15, recommendations p16 3. Campaigns p4 8. Sub-region 3: Essex p17, recommendations p18 4. Major issues p5 9. Sub-region 4: Suffolk p19, recommendations p20 5. Final proposals recommendations p7 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The Eastern region was allocated 57 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of one from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Bedfordshire 6 6 6 Cambridgeshire, 27 27 27 Hertfordshire and Norfolk Essex 18 17 17 Suffolk 7 7 7 2. Under the initial proposals six of the existing 58 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals continued to retain six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies that crossed county boundaries - one between Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, and one between Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire. In Suffolk, Bedfordshire and Essex it was possible to allocate a whole number of constituencies to each county. 1 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation the Commission received over 2,000 representations regarding the Eastern region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● The proposed constituency of North East Hertfordshire. -
Draft Until Signed Minutes of Madingley Parish Council (MPC
Draft until signed Minutes of Madingley Parish Council (MPC) Meeting Monday 9th September at 7.30pm, Madingley Village Hall Present: R Crichton-Stuart (RCS) (Chair), J Stevenson-Hinde (JSH) (Vice-Chair), F Naughton (FN) (Councillor), Attending: S Etherington-Meech (SEM) (Clerk/RFO), Cllr D De Lacey (DDL), Cllr T Bygott (TB) (District Councillor), 7 members of the public 1. Election of chairman and signing of acceptance of office JSH (Vice-Chair) opened the meeting and announced the resignation of Cllr David Ousby (due to conflict of interest working for South Cambs District Council (SCDC) – Davis Ousby advised that he could no longer be a parish councillor at the same time as his current role at SCDC as it would be politically restricted) from MPC a new chair was to be elected, JSH requested nominations for chair. FN proposed RCS for chair and JSH seconded and RCS signed his acceptance of office as chair to MPC – RESOLVED. RCS thanked David Ousby for his service to MPC. Action – Clerk to post notice of vacancy with SCDC and in noticeboards. 2. Apologies for absence and declarations of interest/dispensations No apologises received. RCS declared an interest in item 9. b) i) – Decisions received from SCDC – Brook Cottage. 3. Public Forum The public wanted to acknowledge the work that David Ousby had contributed whilst he was a member of MPC, advising that he had been a pleasure to work alongside with a wealth of knowledge and noted his contribution to the Greenways Vision for the parish. Further to the parish council meeting in July a member of the public advised that farm vehicles are still travelling through the village and wanted to question as to why Park Farm are no longer using the track that they had previously used and when they spoke to Peter Wilderspin at the end of July he thought they would stop in a day or two, however, farm traffic has continued through the summer. -
Housing, Credit and Brexit
Housing, Credit and Brexit Ben Ansell∗ Abstract Dozens of articles have been drafted attempting to explain the narrow vic- tory for the Leave campaign in Britain’s EU referendum in June 2016. Yet, hitherto, and despite a general interest in ‘Left Behind’ commentary, few writ- ers have drawn attention to the connection between the Brexit vote and the distribution of British housing costs. This memo examines the connection be- tween house prices and both aggregate voting during the EU referendum and individual vote intention beforehand. I find a very strong connection at the local authority, ward, and individual level between house prices and support for the Remain campaign, one that even holds up within regions and local authorities. Preliminary analysis suggests that housing values reflect long-run social differences that are just as manifest in attitudes to immigration as Brexit. Local ‘ecologies of unease’ (Reeves and Gimpel, 2012) appear a crucial force behind Brexit. This is a short memo on housing, credit and Brexit to be presented at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 2017. ∗Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions, Nuffield College, University of Oxford. [email protected]. My acknowledgements and thanks go to Jane Gingrich for the provision of local economic and housing data. 1 1 Introduction If there is one saving grace of Brexit for the British higher education system it is a boom of Brexit studies that began pouring forth as the dust settled on June 24th 2016. Most scholars have coalesced around an understanding of Brexit that to some extent mirrors that implicit in Theresa May’s quasi hard Brexit strategy - Brexit was caused by both economic and cultural forces, with opposition to the European Union based on concerns about immigration and of declining cultural and social status rather than economic deprivation or actual migration levels per se (Kaufmann, 2016). -
News from Arbury Community Centre
Community The North Cambridge Community Newsletter SUMMER 2018 nccRegistered Charity Number 1171138 p Bringing Communities Together ISSUE 3 IN THIS ISSUE Projects That Benefit Our Local Community.... FoodCycle News From Arbury Community Centre Activities for Children in Arbury & Kings Hedges Welcome to the third edition of the North Cambridge Community Partnership newsletter. At the end of March Summer Events we said a sad goodbye to our Community worker, Rachal AGM Creek who had done sterling work in seeing us through a What’s On In Arbury transitionary stage of the newly formed NCCP. A small team And King’s Hedges of workers will be replacing her. We are looking forward to being able to continue to offer events for the communities in Run For Your Life Kings Hedges and Arbury. Community Reach Fund Please make a note in your diaries Everyone Health We have a get together on Thursday 14th June from Wildlife Watchers 5:30pm onwards and we very much hope that you will come along to join us at the Meadows Community Centre. The REC - Community You will be able to contribute your own ideas for future Regeneration Proposal projects and review past projects. We will have a brief AGM followed by a buffet of food and drink provided for Sign up to our all those who attend. We need people from all sections of eNewsletter at the community. Come along to find out how to contribute, www.nccp.org.uk and to meet members of the community. THE NORTH CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER Projects that benefit our local community... -
Orchard-Park-Design-Guidance-Spd
South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework Orchard Park Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environmental Assessment Adoption Statement Introduction South Cambridgeshire District Council adopted the Local Development Framework (LDF) Orchard Park Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on 8 March 2011. This statement has been prepared in accordance with the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (16) (3) and (4), which require a statement to be produced on adoption of a plan or programme, to detail: 1. How environmental considerations have been integrated into the plan or programme; 2. How the Environmental Report has been taken into account; 3. How opinions expressed through public consultation have been taken into account; 4. The reasons for choosing the plan or programme as adopted, in the light of the other reasonable alternatives dealt with; 5. The measures that are to be taken to monitor the significant environmental effects of the implementation of the plan or programme. Planning Policy Statement 12 widens these considerations from environmental, to broader sustainability issues, so that this statement provides information on the wider sustainability appraisal process. This statement examines each of these points in turn. Orchard Park Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environmental Assessment Adoption Statement 1 1. How sustainability considerations have been integrated into the plan -
North Area Ward Profile Cambridge 2019
North Area Ward Profile Cambridge 2019 1 Contents 1. Introduction – Page 3 2. Demographics – Pages 4 – 15 3. Indicators of poverty – pages 16 - 17 4. Housing tenure- Pages 18 - 20 5. Community facilities- Pages 21 - 23 6. Open spaces – page 24 - 25 7. Health facilities and statistics – pages 26 - 29 8. Community safety / ASB issues – pages 29 - 34 9. Services in the area – pages 34 - 38 10. Community / voluntary sector – Pages 39 - 41 11. Groups accessing councils grants – page 42 12. Future growth in the area / new developments – pages 43 13. Strengths/ assets within the community– pages 43 - 45 14. Gaps in current provision / key issues – pages 45 - 46 15. Appendices 47-48 2 1. Introduction This Neighbourhood Profile for the North area of the city covers the following wards: Kings Hedges, Arbury, East Chesterton and West Chesterton. The profiles have been collated by the City Council’s Neighbourhood Community Development Team (NCDT) as a tool to developing work plans for the coming year and beyond. The profiles aim to capture key facts and statistics about the area, services that are delivered by the Council and other statutory and voluntary sector partners, key community groups and activities in the area as well as what are perceived to be gaps in provision. Focus groups were held with residents and community groups in each area to identify both positive perceptions of the community as well as identifying issues and gaps from a resident’s perspective. The NCDT has recently realigned its community development resources to work in the areas of highest need in the city. -
'For Referendum' Version of the Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan
Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan 2020 - 2031 Version 4: Referendum version Foreword Neighbourhood Plans were introduced through the Localism Act in 2011 (then referred to as “Neighbourhood Development Plans”). This gives a community the right to develop a plan for their neighbourhood that sets out policies on the development and use of land. Through the development of a Neighbourhood Plan, communities can play a greater role in the development of their area. Once made, Neighbourhood Plans form part of the statutory development plan and this means that South Cambridgeshire District Council must use our Neighbourhood Plan to determine planning applications. The Plan provides local people with the opportunity to have control over where development should go and how it can benefit the community. Histon and Impington are thriving villages where people value the rural feel, the wealth of amenities and being part of a community that is inclusive and diverse. The community wants to have a say in how land is used within the parish, how the villages develop and how to retain what is important to the community. We are situated close to Cambridge, an area where growth has been promoted and there is a need for increased housing as the population and the economy grows. People clearly told us through the consultation that retaining the villages’ distinctive identity and not becoming a suburb of Cambridge is a priority. The Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan has been developed by and with the community. It has been produced by the Histon and Impington Neighbourhood Plan Team, led by Histon and Impington Parish Council, using the views and ideas of those living, working and other stakeholders with an interest in the community. -
South Cambs • ZONDER • a Transport Directory
N T IET RBY South Cambs • ZONDER • A Transport Directory www.scambs.gov.uk Introduction This guide is designed to give information on the public and community transport schemes and providers operating in South Cambridgeshire. We want to increase awareness of what is available and to enable people to contact providers. We are keen to offer choice to the public and encourage the use of all types of public and community transport. The Traveline East Anglia website: www.travelinesoutheast.org.uk, provides comprehensive information for all local public transport services. It also offers door- to-door journey planning across the whole of England, Scotland and Wales. To go to the traveline site for another region please go to: www.traveline.info Train operators For timetables and other information call National Rail Enquiries on 0345 748 4950 or visit www.nationalrail.co.uk. Disabled passengers: how to make arrangements for assistance with rail travel. If you would like assistance when making a journey, such as help getting on or off a train, or ramps for a wheelchair, please contact the train company that manages the station you are starting your journey from. If your journey involves a Network Rail station please contact the train company you are starting your journey with. Please try and give a minimum of 24 hours notice before your journey as this will allow time for any special arrangements to be made. If this is not possible the train companies will still do their best to help, but cannot guarantee to provide their normal level of service. -
Eastern Region
Eastern region Initial proposals Contents Initial proposals summary .............................................................................. 3 1. What is the Boundary Commission for England? ........... 5 2. Background to the 2013 Review ...................................................... 6 3. Initial proposals for the Eastern region .................................... 9 Initial proposals for the Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire sub-region ............................ 10 Initial proposals for the Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, and Suffolk sub-region ................ 12 Initial proposals for the Essex sub-region ............................................................................... 13 4. How to have your say ................................................................................. 16 Annex: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates ........................................................................................ 19 Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 3 9 Initial proposals summary Who we are and what we do region is determined by the electorate of the combined local authorities. The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body which is responsible for reviewing Sub-region Existing Proposed Parliamentary constituency boundaries in allocation allocation England. Bedfordshire and 17 16 Hertfordshire 2013 Review Cambridgeshire, 23 23 We have the -
Stage 2 Coarse Screening – Report
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Stage 2 - Coarse Screening Report 1 July 2020 Page intentionally blank for pagination when printed Mott MacDonald 22 Station Road Cambridge CB1 2JD United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 mottmac.com Anglian Water Services Ltd Lancaster House Ermine Business Park Cambridge Waste Water Lancaster Way Huntingdon Treatment Plant Relocation PE29 6XU Stage 2 - Coarse Screening Report 1 July 2020 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Page intentionally blank for pagination when printed Mott MacDonald | Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation Stage 2 - Coarse Screening Report Document reference: 409071 | 03 | C.4 Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epo rt h as b een pre par ed s olely fo r us e by the par ty which co mmissio ned i t (t he ‘Clien t’) in conn ectio n with t he c aptio ned pr oject.