Ruigtevallei-Dreunberg 132Kv Powerline Amendment of Existing Environmental Authorisation: Dea 14/12/16/3/2/61

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ruigtevallei-Dreunberg 132Kv Powerline Amendment of Existing Environmental Authorisation: Dea 14/12/16/3/2/61 ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED RUIGTEVALLEI-DREUNBERG 132KV POWERLINE AMENDMENT OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION: DEA 14/12/16/3/2/61 24 MAY 2019 PUBLIC RUIGTEVALLEI- DREUNBERG 132KV POWERLINE AMENDMENT OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION: DEA 14/12/16/3/2/61 ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO.: 41101408 DATE: MAY 2019 WSP BUILDING C, KNIGHTSBRIDGE 33 SLOANE STREET BRYANSTON, 2191 SOUTH AFRICA T: +27 11 361 1380 F: +086 606 7121 WSP.COM WSP Environmental (Pty) Ltd. QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Remarks Draft Assessment Report – Public Review DEA Ref: 14/12/16/3/2/61 Date May 2019 Prepared by Tutayi Chifadza Signature Checked by Ashlea Strong Signature Authorised by Ashlea Strong Signature Project number 41101408 Report number 1 File reference file:///W:\000 NEW Projects\41101408 - Eskom Ruigtevallei 132kV\42 ES\2- REPORTS\02-Assessment Report\ WSP is an ISO9001:2015, ISO14001:2015 and OHSAS18001:2007 certified company SIGNATURES PREPARED BY Tutayi Chifadza Environmental Consultant REVIEWED BY Ashlea Strong Principal Consultant This Draft Assessment Report (Report) has been prepared by WSP Environmental Proprietary Limited (WSP) on behalf and at the request of Eskom Holdings (SOC) Limited (Client), to provide the Client and all interested and affected parties with an understanding of the impacts associated with the proposed amendments to their Environmental Authorisation. Unless otherwise agreed by us in writing, we do not accept responsibility or legal liability to any person other than the Client for the contents of, or any omissions from, this Report. To prepare this Report, we have reviewed only the documents and information provided to us by the Client or any third parties directed to provide information and documents to us by the Client. We have not reviewed any other documents in relation to this Report, except where otherwise indicated in the Report. P R ODUCTION TEAM CLIENT – ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED Manager: Environmental Management: Angelina Shalang Land Development and Environment WSP Project Manager Ashlea Strong Environmental Consultant Tutayi Chifadza SUBCONSULTANTS Wetland Specialist WSP Environmental (Pty) Ltd Biodiversity Specialist Indwe Environmental Consulting: Megan Hugo Avifaunal Specialist Wild Skies Environmental Consulting, Jon Smallie Heritage Specialist eThembeni Cultural Heritage Management, Len van Schalkwyk Palaeontology Specialist Natura Viva, Dr John Almond ACRONYMS AND ABB REVIATIONS AIA Archaeological Impact Assessment AR Assessment Report BA Basic Assessment BAR Basic Assessment Report CBA Critical Biodiversity Area DEA Department of Environmental Affairs DEDEAT Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism DPW Department of Public Works DRDLR Department of Rural Development and Land Reform DWS Department of Water and Sanitation EA Environmental Authorisation EAP Environmental Assessment Practitioner ECO Environmental Control Officer ECPHRA Eastern Cape Provincial Heritage Resources Authority ECPTA Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIAR Environmental Impact Assessment Report EMPr Environmental Management Programme GNR Government Notice Regulations HIA Heritage Impact Assessment I&APs Interested and Affected Parties NEMA National Environmental Management Act NHRA National Heritage Resources Act PIA Palaeontological Impact Assessment SAHRA South African Heritage Resources Agency CONTENT OF THIS R EPORT As per the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 2014, as amended, Regulation 32 of Government Notice Regulation (GNR) 326 identifies the legislated requirements, which must be contained within an Assessment Report for the competent authority to consider and come to a decision on the amendment application. The Table A below details where the required information is located within this draft Assessment Report (this report). Table A: Legal Requirements as detailed in Regulation 32 of GNR 326 RELEVANT Regulation 32 of REPORT GNR 326 DESCRIPTION SECTION 1 The applicant must within 90 days of receipt by the competent authority of the The final application made in terms of regulation 31, submit to the competent authority: Amendment Report will be submitted to DEA as per requirement (a) A report reflecting: (i) An assessment of all impacts related to the proposed change; Section 4 and Section 4.2.5 (ii) Advantages and disadvantages associated with the proposed change; and Section 3.3 (iii) Measures to ensure avoidance, management and mitigation of impacts Section 5 associated with such proposed change; and (iv) Any changes to the EMPr: Section 5 Which report: (i) Had been subjected to a public participation process, which had been Proof to be included agreed to by the competent authority, and which was appropriate to bring in the Final Report. the proposed change to the attention of potential and registered interested and affected parties, including organs of state, which have jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the relevant activity, and the competent authority; and (ii) Reflects the incorporation of comments received, including any To be included in comments of the competent authority the Final Report. (b) A notification in writing that the report will be submitted within 140 days of receipt Not Applicable of application by the competent authority, as significant changes have been made or significant new information has been added to the report, which changes or information was contained in the report consulted on during the initial public participation process contemplated in subregulation 1(a) and that the revised report will be subjected to another public participation process of at least 30 days. 2 In the event where subregulation (1)(b) applies, the report, which reflects the Not Applicable incorporation of comments received, including any comments of the competent authority, must be submitted to the competent authority within 140 days of receipt of the application by the competent authority RUIGTEVALLEI-DREUNBERG 132KV POWERLINE WSP Project No. 41101408 May 2019 ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED Page v TABLE OF 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ...................................................... 1 CONTENTS 1.2 BACKGROUND AND PROJECT OVERVIEW ............................. 1 1.3 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ...................................................... 1 1.4 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................. 1 1.5 TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................ 1 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT .............................. 2 2.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN ..................................... 2 2.2 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION ............................................. 3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................... 5 3.1 PROJECT HISTORY .................................................................... 5 3.2 PROJECT AND SURROUNDING AREA ..................................... 5 3.3 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES .................................... 1 4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................ 2 4.1 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................. 2 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS .............................. 5 4.3 OVERALL SENSITIVITY ............................................................ 21 5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME ........................................................... 2 5.1 BIODIVERSITY ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................... 2 5.2 AVIFAUNA ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................... 2 5.3 SURFACE WATER AND WETLAND ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES .................................. 3 5.4 HERITAGE ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................... 5 5.5 PALAEONTOLOGY ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................... 5 5.6 SOIL AND LAND ADDITIONAL OR AMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................... 6 RUIGTEVALLEI-DREUNBERG 132KV POWERLINE WSP Project No. 41101408 May 2019 ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED 5.7 CONCLUSION.............................................................................. 6 6 CONCLUSION ........................................................... 7 RUIGTEVALLEI-DREUNBERG 132KV POWERLINE WSP Project No. 41101408 May 2019 ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LIMITED TABLES TABLE 1-1: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE RUIGTEVALLEI- DREUNBERG 132KV POWERLINE EA ........................................................... 1 TABLE 2-1: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN IN TERMS OF REGULATION 41 .......................................................... 2 TABLE 2-2: INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES TABLE ........................................................... 3 TABLE 3-1: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ........................................ 1 TABLE 4-1: SPECIALISTS APPOINTED TO DETERMINE AND ASSESS THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS .................................................. 5 TABLE 4-2: 2012 BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS SIGNIFICANCE RATING............................................... 6 TABLE 4-3: 2013 SECTION 24G BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS SIGNIFICANCE RATING............................................... 7 TABLE 4-4: 2012 AVIFAUNA IMPACTS SIGNIFICANCE
Recommended publications
  • Declaration Amendment of National Road R58 Section 1
    4 No. 39868 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 30 MARCH 2016 GOVERNMENT NOTICES • GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWINGS Transport, Department of/ Vervoer, Departement van DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT NO. 374 30 MARCH 2016 374 South African National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act (7/1998): Declaration amendment of National Road R58 Section 1: Norvalspont–Venterstad 39868 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED Registration No: 1998/009584/30 DECLARATION AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL ROAD R58 SECTION 1 AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION No. 305 OF 2012 By virtue of Section 40 (1)(b) of The South African National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998), I hereby amend Declaration No. 305 of 2012 by substituting paragraph B(i) of the schedule thereof, with the subjoined sheets 1 to 10 of Plan No. P879/15. The continuation of this declaration, from points L141 and R146 on sheet 7 of Plan No. P879/15, is following the street known as Tennant Street, at time of declaration, up to its intersection with the street known as Kannemeyer Street, at time of declaration, in the town of Venterstad. In the town it includes the roadway, angled or parallel surfaced parking bays which form part of the roadway, but excludes kerbs, surfaced and gravel shoulders parking bays, channels, islands, sidewalks and all other services along the said route. (National Road R58 Section 1: Norvalspont – Venterstad) MINIST: R OF TRANSPORT This gazette is also available free online at www.gpwonline.co.za 6 < .4 r°oo Rem PTN 1 vó L3 REM ® No. 39868 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 L4 L1 L2 : 5 6 L7 R1.
    [Show full text]
  • South African National Roads Agency's Presentation
    PRESENTATION TO BORDER KEI CHAMBER OF BUSINESS Presented by Mbulelo Peterson 12 February 2016 1 PRESENTATION OUTLINE • SANRAL’s Service Delivery Model • SANRAL Philosophy on asset preservation • Budget breakdown • Secondary Strategic Network • Projects • Bypasses • Community Development projects SANRAL’S SERVICE DELIVERY MODEL • SANRAL is the implementing arm of the Department of Transport. • SANRAL was established in 1998 by an act of parliament. • SANRAL’s mandate is to plan, design, construct and maintain the National Road Network. • SANRAL opted to carry out this mandate by outsourcing the design, construction and maintenance of the network by making use of private consulting firms and construction companies. • SANRAL opted to be an INFORMED CLIENT that retained the planning, management and decision making capacity in-house. SANRAL PHILOSOPHY ON ASSET PRESERVATION 1. Asset Preservation and Management come first! 2. One has to plan and budget for the maintenance and preservation of the road network before thinking of upgrades. 3. Safety on our roads must receive top priority. 4. Law enforcement must be seen to be effected at all times. 5. Overload control centres should be operational 24 hours a day. 4 BUDGET BREAKDOWN 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Routine Maintenance 226,828,895 253,161,101 281,735,381 329,569,905 Periodic Maintenance 159,889,022 577,385,138 1,073,396,998 1,489,591,810 Special Maintenance 204,828,543 183,763,104 416,761,552 423,526,687 Strengthening 470,047,511 688,360,522 560,079,264 882,885,142 Improvements 954,365,978
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report
    VOLUME THREE Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction to Regional Profiles ........ 1 Appendix: National Chronology......................... 12 Chapter 2 REGIONAL PROFILE: Eastern Cape ..................................................... 34 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Eastern Cape........................................................... 150 Chapter 3 REGIONAL PROFILE: Natal and KwaZulu ........................................ 155 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in Natal, KwaZulu and the Orange Free State... 324 Chapter 4 REGIONAL PROFILE: Orange Free State.......................................... 329 Chapter 5 REGIONAL PROFILE: Western Cape.................................................... 390 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Western Cape ......................................................... 523 Chapter 6 REGIONAL PROFILE: Transvaal .............................................................. 528 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Transvaal ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment for Proposed Expansion of the Burgersdorp Correctional Facility, Burgersdorp, Eastern Cape Province
    Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment for proposed expansion of the Burgersdorp Correctional Facility, Burgersdorp, Eastern Cape Province. Report prepared by Palaeo Field Services, PO Box 38806 Langenhovenpark 9330. 05 / 09 / 2019 ------------------- 1 Summary A Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment was carried out for the proposed expansion of the Burgersdorp Correctional Facility, located outside Burgersdorp in the Eastern Cape Province. The chances of palaeontological impact resulting from the proposed development are considered to be improbable because of the nature of the underlying geology. As far as the palaeontological heritage is concerned, the proposed development affecting Area 1 and 2, as well as the river crossing area may proceed with no further palaeontological assessments required. If, in the unlikely event that localized fossil material is discovered within the alluvial overburden near the spruit during the construction phase of the project, it is recommended that a professional palaeontologist be called in to record and rescue the fossils where necessary. Both study areas are located within a region that has previously yielded ample archaeological as well as historical evidence of the early movement and settlement of Khoi herders and San hunter-gatherers along the Orange River during the last 2000 years. However, the proposed development footprint is located on fairly degraded terrain resulting from previous and ongoing prison operations. Areas 1 and 2, as well as the river crossing area, are not considered archaeologically vulnerable, and there are no major archaeological grounds to suspend the proposed development, provided that all excavation activities are confined to within the confines of the development footprints. All the study areas considered to be of low archaeological significance and is assigned a site rating of Generally Protected C.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Integrated Development Plan 2020 – 2021 Financial Year
    DRAFT INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020 – 2021 FINANCIAL YEAR Final Review Date: Resolution No: Table of Contents ACRONYMS.......................................................................................................................ii MAYORS FOREWORD.....................................................................................................vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BY MUNICIPAL MANAGER.....................................................viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.................................................1 CHAPTER TWO: SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK.........................................34 CHAPTER THREE: LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT............................................49 CHAPTER FOUR: SERVICE DELIVERY.........................................................................82 CHAPTER FIVE: DISASTER MANAGEMENT..............................................................118 CHAPTER SIX: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION......................137 CHAPTER SEVEN: INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFORMATION......164 CHAPTER EIGHT: STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL ALIGNMENT 211 CHAPTER NINE: FINANCIAL VIABILITY.......................................................................228 CHAPTER TEN: ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM......250 ACRONYMS 3Rs: Reduction Reuse Recycle ABET: Adult Basic Education and Training AG: Auditor General AsgiSA: Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative BBBEE: Broad-based Black economic empowerment CASP: Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Shivers in the Grip of Icy Weather
    MEDIA RELEASE Thursday, 17 August 2017 South Africa shivers in the grip of icy weather A cold front moved over the Free State yesterday, 16 August 2017 and progressed further northwards through Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal overnight. In the wake of the advancing cold front, widespread rain occurred over the southern parts of the country, with the Eastern Cape bearing the brunt of the extreme wintery weather overnight. A cut-off low in the upper parts of the atmosphere is currently positioned over the eastern highlands of the country, contributing to the overall severity and intensity of this winter system. The Eastern Cape has been very dry of late, experiencing much less rainfall than is usually the case, with many dams and reservoirs urgently in need of replenishment. This episode of rainfall, augmented by snowmelt in the days to come, will be most welcome for the Eastern Cape. Significant rainfall indeed occurred overnight across the Eastern Cape. Whilst falls were not particularly heavy (of the order of 30 or more mm in many places), further rainfall is expected today. In particular, heavier falls have occurred this morning, in and around the Port Alfred area and adjacent interior, where localised flooding may occur today. Widespread snowfalls were also reported over high-lying terrain in the Eastern Cape. Consequently, many roads and mountain passes in the Eastern Cape are currently closed, as per the listing below. Further heavy snowfall, of the order of 2cm per hour is expected for the Winterberg region of Eastern Cape today. Bolepi
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration Amendment of National Road N6 Section B
    STAATSKOERANT, 5 NOVEMBER 2008 No.31570 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWING OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT OEPARTEMENT VAN VERVOER No. 1173 5 November 2008 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED Registration No: 98/09584/06 DECLARATION AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL ROAD N6 SECTION B AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION NO. 930 OF 2006 By virtue of section 40 (1 )(b) of the South African National Roads Agency Limited and the National Roads Act, 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998), I hereby amend Declaration No. 930 of 2006 by substituting Annexure paragraph (II) and (Ill), with the subjoined sheets 1 to 13 of Plan No. P679/08. [National Road N6 Section B: Reddersburg - N1 (Bloemfontein)] MfNISTER OF TRANSPORT "" NOORDE INO \"" \>< ...."" \t. \0 + KLEINOEEL No.288 I'-l No. 41 2 t. .... N / / ';l ~ MOLEN DAM '( ..19 ')00 ~ o~ 0 GLORIA ~~ No.48 0 PTN 3 "" 0 No.411 ...."" 1-:::"PTN 3 ~ N I co ... /r'",,\\'!t ERF 534 I \ ont.t"t c,,~v PTN 4 0 '"0 In.l:.-n'l ......... l41- -­ -At I SERVo L5\ L6 \ L1 UA ..'.............'.....'.............'. '. '.'.'.'-.' :.. -: .. ':':.:-:. ;.:.: .:.: .: .:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:-: -: .:-~::: .:. :. » :.:.:-:.:.:.:.:-: .:.:-:.:.: .: .: ~.;. :.:.:. :.:.: .:.:.:. .:.:. :. :. :.:.:...'.......'.......'. ' ..... ~. IH R5 R5A EXT. 2 PTN 4 >< >< >< P,N 3 (J) t. : EL 1M i- t. '( ...1'1 000 N ':,No 159 PTN 1 MOLEN DAM N co CO ~ ~ REM ~7 <:) ~ ... ~ No.48 (J) A o CD m It BELLEVUE »JJ N o z N ~ :-1 co No. 41 3 g ROOIKOPJESj REM 01 '" Z g g PTN 3 o '( +19 000 MOLEN DAM No.233REM +'8 o No.48 <m L9 L9A s:: OJ m .~A-:-:.:- :-:-:.;.:-:.;...:......:-:.: .:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:.;.;...; .. .;.....-:-:.:-:-:.; -: .~: .;-:-: -:-:-:.:-:-:­ ;. ....:-'±';':-:-:-:-: -: .:-:-:-:-:-:-: .:-:. ··5~r.;-:·· .;.-:.:-. -:-:.:-:- :-:-:-:-:- y:-:-:.;.:-:-;.:-;.....;. ..... j; ..... ,...... ~7 A JJ R5A ~ 1 o \ PTN 1 (X) PTN 4 ~ MIDDELWATER A >< ROOIKOPJES >< No.278 +>< >< '( ....,90+ MOLEN DAM "" No.233 "" REM t.
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL NATURE RESERVES KWAZULU-NATAL FREE STATE LESOTHO Matatiele
    EASTERN CAPE PROVINCIAL NATURE RESERVES KWAZULU-NATAL FREE STATE LESOTHO Matatiele Sterkspruit R56 N6N6 10 N2 11 Lady Grey Mount Fletcher AL R58 Venterstad ALIWAL Rhodes Moun Ayliff NORTHERN CAPE NORTH Barkly East R394 Mount Frere Bizana Burgersdorp rger R61 t Jamestown N2 Maclear Flagstaff Wild Coast Sun N6N6 Ugie R56 R394 Steynsburg Qumbu R61 R56 R56R5 Elliot Mololtentenoo Dordrecht R56 Lusikisiki R56 Mbotyi 9 Middelburg Sterkstroom Indwe 16 R61 R61 N9 Hofmeyer Libode PORT ST JOHNS Lady Frere Ngcobo MTHATHA N10 N6N6 12 Qunu Umngazi Mouth Bethesdaweg Nieu-Bethesda R611 Queenstown Qamata N2 R61 8 R61 Elliotdale R61 Tarkastad R67R67 Cofimvaba Tsomo Coffee Bay Dutywa Hole in the Wall WESTERN CAPE Cradock WhittleseaWh Graaff-Reinet 2 1514 R351 4 R351R351 Cathcart Willowvale N9 R337 Butterworth N10 N6 The Haven Aberdeen Centane Qora Mouth SeymourSe Pearston Stutterheim Mazeppa Bay Bedford R67R67 Hogsback R63 N2 Qolora Mouth R63 Adelaidede Kei Road Komga Kei Mouth R337 Somerset East 10 INDIAN OCEAN Cookhouse 5 AliceAl Morgan’s Bay N9 R63 BHISHO 3 Golden Valley Fort Beauforteaufort N6 Chintsa Mouth Jansenvile R335 King WillWilliam’s Town Middleton Berlin Gonubie Klipplaat R350 R345R345 6 N2 Bonza Bay R75 R6R677 Gulu EAST LONDON Peddie R72 Kidd’s Beach N10 Kaysers Beach Willowmore Wolwefontein GRAHAMSTOWN Steytlerville Hamburg Kirkwood Paterson 1413 R6R677 BathurstBa N2 SaleSalemm Mpekweni N9 Addo R677 Fish River Sun 7 R343 Alexandriadria Port Alfred Patensie Uitenhage Kenton-on-Sea Louterwater Colchester R62 1 Hankey Coega Boesmansrivier Misgund
    [Show full text]
  • 36670 19-7 Roadcarrierp
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA July Vol. 577 Pretoria, 19 2013 Julie No. 36670 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 302969—A 36670—1 2 No. 36670 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 19 JULY 2013 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the sender’s respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Oorgrenspadvervoeragentskap aansoek- Applications for permits:.......................... permitte: .................................................. Menlyn..................................................... 3 36670 Menlyn..................................................... 3 36670 Applications concerning Operating Aansoeke aangaande Bedryfslisensies:.
    [Show full text]
  • UMSOBOMVU IDP 2014 15 Review
    UMSOBOMVU MUNICIPALITY INTERGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2012 – 2017 2014/15 REVIEW CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... xi 1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1. The Legislative Framework and Integrated Development Planning ..................................... 1 1.1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2. Purpose of the IDP’s ............................................................................................ 1 1.1.3. The Legal Requirement for IDPs ............................................................................ 1 1.2. The Theoretical Perspective on Development Planning ...................................................... 2 1.2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2. Overview of the IDP Process: The Strategic Nature .................................................. 3 1.2.3. Methodology ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2.4. The Process: Public Participation ............................................................................ 6 1.2.5. Conclusion .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South African Numbered Route Description and Destination Analysis
    NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT RDDA SOUTH AFRICAN NUMBERED ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND DESTINATION ANALYSIS MAY 2012 Prepared by: TITLE SOUTH AFRICAN NUMBERED ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND DESTINATION ANALYSIS ISBN STATUS DOT FILE DATE 2012 UPDATE May 2012 COMMISSIONED BY: National Department of Transport COTO Private Bag x193 Roads Coordinating Body PRETORIA SA Route Numbering and Road Traffic 0001 Signs Committee SOUTH AFRICA CARRIED OUT BY: TTT Africa Author: Mr John Falkner P O Box 1109 Project Director: Dr John Sampson SUNNINGHILL Specialist Support: Mr David Bain 2157 STEERING COMMITTEE: Mr Prasanth Mohan Mr Vishay Hariram Ms Leslie Johnson Mr Schalk Carstens Mr Nkululeko Vezi Mr Garth Elliot Mr Msondezi Futshane Mr Willem Badenhorst Mr Rodney Offord Mr Jaco Cronje Mr Wlodek Gorny Mr Richard Rikhotso Mr Andre Rautenbach Mr Frank Lambert [i] CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... xi 2. TERMINOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... xi 3. HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT .......................................................................................... xii ROUTE DESCRIPTION – NATIONAL ROUTES NATIONAL ROUTE N1 .............................................................................................................................. 1 NATIONAL ROUTE N2 .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 36518 7-6 Roadcarrierpp1 Layout 1
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA June Vol. 576 Pretoria, 7 2013 Junie No. 36518 PART 1 OF 3 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 302322—A 36518—1 2 No. 36518 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 7 JUNE 2013 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the senderʼs respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS INHOUD Page Gazette Bladsy Koerant No. No. No. No. No. No. Transport, Department of Vervoer, Departement van Cross Border Road Transport Agency: Oorgrenspadvervoeragentskap aansoek- Applications for permits:.......................... permitte: .................................................. Menlyn..................................................... 3 36518 Menlyn..................................................... 3 36518 Applications concerning Operating Aansoeke aangaande
    [Show full text]