88 Article 88 by Fareeduddin* and D. M. Banerjee **# Aravalli Craton and its Mobile Belts: An Update *Geological Survey of India, Bangalore; Email:
[email protected] **Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi- 110007; Email:
[email protected]; #Corresponding Author (Received : 05/05/2019; Revised accepted : 17/09/2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020005 The continued existence of an Eo-Paleoarchean viable, although somewhat debatable stratigraphic order. proto-continent through Proterozoic times in the Aravalli Reassessment of stratigraphic position of the basal Mountain Range is now widely accepted. The quartzite, basic volcanics and, paleosol units with the protocontinent’s growth culminated with the outpouring BGC helped to understand the stratigraphy of the of ~2.5 Ga old silicic magma by the end of Neoarchean, Aravalli sedimentary pile in a new perspective. which produced polyphase granites-gneisses, and Inappropriate application of Lomagund-Jatuli heavy migmatites of the ‘Banded Gneissic Complex.’ The isotope event to assign an age to the Aravalli carbonate polycyclic Proterozoic orogenic processes involved rocks is discussed. The possibility of two separate crustal thickening and thermal perturbations, which episodes of carbonate sedimentation events needed reconstituted its pristine character. The term Banded emphasis. Discussion included the use of the robust U- Gneissic Complex (BGC) as a valid lithodemic unit has Pb dates in fixing the age of the Aravalli basin opening. survived while nomenclature like Mangalwar Gneiss and The attention to the fallacy of using the age of Darwal Mewar Gneiss failed to satisfy the international Granite in assigning age to the Aravalli sedimentaries stratigraphic code. BGC with relics of ancient was drawn.