Birdlife International Africa Partnership E-Bulletin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Birdlife International Africa Partnership E-Bulletin BirdLife International Africa Partnership E-bulletin Together for birds and people July - September 2005 BirdLife International Africa Partnership Secretariat, PO Box 3502, 00100 GPO Nairobi, Kenya T: +254-20-8562246 / F: +254-20-8562259 / E: [email protected] / W: www.birdlife.org *** CAP SPECIAL *** Panel discussion This edition of the BirdLife Africa CAP 2005 opened with a panel discussion, chaired Partnership E-bulletin is fully dedicated to by Paul Matiku from NatureKenya (see photo). the BirdLife Council for the Africa The question to answer was: ‘what have we Partnership (CAP) meeting 2005 hosted saved?’ by CBCS, the Cameroon Biodiversity Conservation Society, in Kribi, Cameroon. This meeting took place from 25-29 July 2005 and was attended by 63 people from 24 countries. The meeting was chaired by Achilles Byaruhanga of NatureUganda and opened by Dr. Madi Ali, the General Secretary in the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife (MINFOF) of Cameroon. The theme of the meeting was “People- centered Conservation”. Read all about it in this e-bulletin! The editors The answer was: a lot, but not enough. Yes; it is assumed that more than 18 bird species (globally) ** NEWS FLASH ** would have gone extinct without BirdLife See also the press release from CAP 2005: intervention; and yes, it is true that local http://www.birdlife.org/news/pr/2005/07/ communities are now supporting conservation africa_mdgs.html across Africa, e.g. 10,000 hectares of Oku Forest in Cameroon is being saved through PFM; and yes, IBAs are now informing policy decisions across the continent. But on the other hand: conservation has slipped down the global agenda, and is completely missing from the G8 declaration; climate change will exacerbate existing habitat loss; the BirdLife network only covers 18 out of the 58 countries and islands in Africa; and last but not least: we are not too good at promoting ourselves, which impacts on our fundraising capabilities… Thus, the conclusion was: we are Group photo of the participants who attended the CAP 05 doing well, but we need to get more resources into meeting. Also in the photo are representatives from the African conservation; and we need to build on our Cameroon Government. successes. We are ‘Africa’s best kept secret’ so we need to go out there and tell our story! BirdLife International Africa Partnership – E-bulletin Together for birds and people GEF project meeting On the Sunday prior to the CAP meeting itself, a project meeting, convened by Paulinus Ngeh from the BirdLife Africa West Africa office, kicked off the PDF-B phase of the new GEF-UNDP funded project ‘Enhancing local capacities for sustainable biodiversity action in Africa’. UNDP Regional representative for Southern Africa Nik Sekhran facilitated the meeting which was attended by the project managers from Burundi, Botswana, Rwanda, Liberia and Nigeria. Philipp Van Waechter attended the meeting on behalf of UNOPS. During the meeting, a clear plan of action The CAP 2005 opening ceremony was graced by officials from was developed in order to make the the Cameroon Government who are seen here with the CAP implementation of this PDF-B as smooth as Chair and Dr Mike Rands, the BirdLife International CEO possible. For more information, please contact the BirdLife International regional Project Manager: BirdLife in Cameroon [email protected] On the first day of CAP, Mike Rands, BirdLife’s CEO, presented the past, present and vision for Data Zone BirdLife International’s programme in Cameroon. BirdLife has a long presence in the country, dating back to the 1980s. In 1995, BirdLife started Worldbirds working with CBCS (then COC). The organization Debbie Pain, RSPB’s Head of International has since grown rapidly and is now implementing a Research, gave a presentation on the Worldbirds growing portfolio of projects ranging from initiative (see also our previous e-bulletin). This biodiversity conservation to empowerment of initiative aims to collect data from birders all-over marginalized communities. According to Mike the world in order to make them available to Rands, it is envisioned that the BirdLife Secretariat conservation organisations and the public. It will will “provide the requisite technical, management capture data previously unavailable, will provide support, capacity building, networking and countries with a simple list-based monitoring international linkages to empower and develop scheme and will encourage the collection of new CBCS to fully represent, take forward and oversee data in a more systematic and repeatable way. For BirdLife’s operations and projects in Cameroon.” more details, see www.worldbirds.org or contact [email protected] at the Secretariat. Regional initiatives Science, Policy and Information Dr Stuart Buchart, BirdLife’s Global Species Regional Initiatives 2005 Programme Coordinator, explained to CAP what The CAP input papers provided an overview of the Science, Policy and Information (SPI) recently completed, ongoing and planned ‘regional department at the BirdLife global office does for initiatives’. This overview demonstrates that the the Africa (and the global) Partnership. This varies progress made in terms of developing and from developing indicators for monitoring, species implementing regional (multi-country) projects and sites (IBA) programmes, and key datasets, to across the African region. Where a few years ago refining BirdLife’s policy & advocacy processes, the BirdLife Africa Partnership was involved in forging productive collaborations, and one major regional project, in 2005 eleven projects communicating BirdLife’s messages. For more are being implemented which include more than data, please contact [email protected] one country. Some of them were presented in more and/or the SPI Director [email protected]. detail during the CAP meeting (see below). For more details and/or the whole list of projects, Do you have some hot news? Let us know so we contact [email protected] and/or can prepare a ** News Alert ** for the [email protected] BirdLife website www.birdlife.org! 2 July – September 2005 BirdLife International Africa Partnership – E-bulletin Together for birds and people Species Arinaitwe, the regional IBA Programme Manager for Africa, gave a presentation on its contents, after which Achilles Byaruhanga, the Chair of CAP, The BirdLife Africa Species Working Group officially handed over the strategy to the Director (ASWG) oversees the implementation of the Africa and CEO of BirdLife International, Dr Mike Rands Species Programme. The Species Action Plan (see photo below). (SAP) project is the key activity of the ASWG, with the Darwin-funded follow-up project now concentrating on enabling the Partners and Species Interest Groups to implement the SAPs. During CAP 2005, the recently-appointed ASWG Coordinator Paul Kariuki Ndang’ang’a gave a presentation of the progress and plans of this project. Recommendations from an ASWG convened meeting on 26 July 2005 include the need to: (1) encourage the Africa Partnership to prioritize implementation of Species Action Plans and production of more SAPs (where necessary) in their work; (2) encourage the Africa Partnership to seek opportunities for passing on the training already obtained from the two SAP projects to many of their staff and partners; (3) support Copies of the strategy were disseminated during formation and sustainability of Species Interest the meeting and more copies have been sent to the Groups that take a lead in conserving key species; Partners afterwards. Unknown to the Secretariat at and (4) treat species work as the ‘core business’ of the time of the launch, the Jensen Foundation in the BirdLife Africa Partnership. During the species Denmark has awarded the BirdLife Africa session at CAP, the challenges of implementing Partnership a grant to develop an IBA ‘toolkit’ SAPs and how to overcome them were discussed. which will complement this regional conservation The ‘Species Champion’ approach of monitoring strategy and will facilitate its implementation. critically endangered species was introduced and [email protected] can be contacted for its appropriateness for African species and within more information or copies. the Partnership was discussed thoroughly. It was also seen to be likely to bring in many opportunities for species conservation. Please Monitoring IBAs contact [email protected] for more information on the species programme. IBA monitoring through Remote Sensing Both detailed and basic monitoring of IBAs are already taking place within the network. But IBA [Photo left: the species NOT monitoring within the region is set to become even seen during CAP] more robust through developing a system using remote sensing. A regional project ‘Monitoring IBAs in Africa using remote sensing’ was presented at CAP by Debbie Pain (RSPB). It is a joint project between the Birdlife Africa Sites Partnership, the Birdlife Global Secretariat, the RSPB and the Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit Launch of RIBACS of the European Commission. The project aims to On Tuesday 26 July, the Regional Important Bird look at the feasibility of using remote sensing for Area Conservation Strategy (RIBACS) 2005-2015 monitoring vegetation cover in African IBAs, to was launched. This strategy has three major aims: develop a protocol for monitoring African IBAs to promote standardized approaches in IBA using remote sensing and to investigate the conservation; to promote home-grown
Recommended publications
  • South Africa Mega Birding III 5Th to 27Th October 2019 (23 Days) Trip Report
    South Africa Mega Birding III 5th to 27th October 2019 (23 days) Trip Report The near-endemic Gorgeous Bushshrike by Daniel Keith Danckwerts Tour leader: Daniel Keith Danckwerts Trip Report – RBT South Africa – Mega Birding III 2019 2 Tour Summary South Africa supports the highest number of endemic species of any African country and is therefore of obvious appeal to birders. This South Africa mega tour covered virtually the entire country in little over a month – amounting to an estimated 10 000km – and targeted every single endemic and near-endemic species! We were successful in finding virtually all of the targets and some of our highlights included a pair of mythical Hottentot Buttonquails, the critically endangered Rudd’s Lark, both Cape, and Drakensburg Rockjumpers, Orange-breasted Sunbird, Pink-throated Twinspot, Southern Tchagra, the scarce Knysna Woodpecker, both Northern and Southern Black Korhaans, and Bush Blackcap. We additionally enjoyed better-than-ever sightings of the tricky Barratt’s Warbler, aptly named Gorgeous Bushshrike, Crested Guineafowl, and Eastern Nicator to just name a few. Any trip to South Africa would be incomplete without mammals and our tally of 60 species included such difficult animals as the Aardvark, Aardwolf, Southern African Hedgehog, Bat-eared Fox, Smith’s Red Rock Hare and both Sable and Roan Antelopes. This really was a trip like no other! ____________________________________________________________________________________ Tour in Detail Our first full day of the tour began with a short walk through the gardens of our quaint guesthouse in Johannesburg. Here we enjoyed sightings of the delightful Red-headed Finch, small numbers of Southern Red Bishops including several males that were busy moulting into their summer breeding plumage, the near-endemic Karoo Thrush, Cape White-eye, Grey-headed Gull, Hadada Ibis, Southern Masked Weaver, Speckled Mousebird, African Palm Swift and the Laughing, Ring-necked and Red-eyed Doves.
    [Show full text]
  • Call Function and Vocal Activity in the Southern Bald Ibis at a Breeding Site
    Åòòîëîã³ÿ Á3åðêó 12Â4èï. 2100 258 - 26 CALL FUNCTION AND VOCAL ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN BALD IBIS AT A BREEDING SITE Grzegorz Kopij Abstract. Studies were carried out in a breeding colony at Welgelegen, eastern Free State, South Africa in 1994. Seven different calls in the Southern Bald Ibis were distinguished and their function has been determined: clangor, alarm, barking, copulation, snoring, greeting and begging. In the pre-laying phase, breeding and non- breeding pairs were equally vocal. Among breeding birds females were more (60.0 %) vocal than males (40.0 % of 402 calls recorded), while among non-breeding paired birds the reverse was true (males: 57.5 %, females: 42.5 %; n = 134 calls recorded). At the nest, breeding birds were more vocal during the incubation than during the pre-laying and nestling phases, while non-breeding paired birds are more vocal at the beginning of the breeding season than latter. During the day, breeding birds are more vocal in the morning (7001000; 40.5 %), while non- breeding paired birds are more vocal around the noon (10001400; 50.6 %) and in the evening (16001800; 23.4 %). Key words: Southern Bald Ibis, Geronticus calvus, South Africa, vocalization, vocal activity. Address: Department of Zoology & Ecology, Agricultural University of Wroc³aw, ul. Ko¿uchowska 5b, 51- 631 Wroc³aw, Poland. Ôóíêöèè êðèêîâ è âîêàëüíàÿ àêòèâíîñòü ó ëûñîãî èáèñà â ìåñòàõ ãíåçäîâàíèÿ. - Ã. Êîïèé. - Áåðêóò. 13 (2). 2004. - Èññëåäîâàíèÿ ïðîâîäèëèñü íà îäíîé èç ãíåçäîâûõ êîëîíèé â Âåëãåëåãåíå íà âîñ- òîêå Îðàíæåâîãî Ñâîáîäíîãî Ãîñóäàðñòâà â ÞÀÐ â 1994 ã. Áûëî âûäåëåíî 7 ðàçëè÷íûõ êðèêîâ è îïðåäå- ëåíà èõ ôóíêöèÿ: òðåâîãà, êîïóëÿöèÿ, ïðèâåòñòâèå, âûïðàøèâàíèå è äð.
    [Show full text]
  • Loro Parque Fundación
    News Highlights • News Highlights • News Highlights • News Highlights • News Highlights • News Highlights Loro Parque Table 1. Gross exports of live wild-caught African Grey Parrots Exporting 2005 2006 2007 2008 Fundación countries Recent trade, capture of wild A B A B A B A B African Grey Parrots Range countries 16 48,456 10 17,110 12 6,422 11 10,390 of Africa In recent decades a high level of capture African countries 9 246 6 215 7 944 5 105 and legal trade in wild African Grey Parrots out of range (Psittacus erithacus) has occurred. A major Middle Eastern 10 983 8 53 3 9 4 768 exporting country has been Cameroon, countries with offi cial statistics from 1981 to 2005 Asian countries 2 118 2 3,177 2 1,065 1 537 showing that it exported 367,166 individu- All other countries 18 794 12 61 12 33 8 15 als, with a yearly average of 15,299. Totals 55 50,597 38 20,616 36 8,473 29 11,815 From 1990 to 1996, it exported 48 per- A = number of countries, B = number of specimens Note: All countries not within the natural geographical range of the species re-exported the specimens. cent of the African Grey Parrots of all coun- tries in Africa. From 1993 to 2006, the offi - Table 2. Gross exports of live wild-caught African Grey Parrots cial CITES (Convention on International Exporting 2005 2006 2007 2008 Trade in Endangered Species of Fauna and countries Flora) annual export quota for this species A B A B A B A B from Cameroon had remained 12,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 Edition of the Adjutant. It Is, However, with a Touch of Sadness That I Write This Introduction to This Excellent, Rejuvenated and Revised Magazine
    Welcome to the 2008 edition of The Adjutant. It is, however, with a touch of sadness that I write this introduction to this excellent, rejuvenated and revised magazine. Let me explain. Earlier this year it became clear that our sister society, the Royal Air Force Ornithological Society (RAFOS), was not able to guarantee future funding for Osprey, our joint magazine. The Committee of the Army Ornithological Society (AOS) quickly came to the conclusion that it did not have the necessary resources to ‘go it alone’ and decided that Osprey would no longer be published. I am fully aware that my predecessor, Ian Nason, spent much time and energy on encouraging the start of Osprey, the first edition of which appeared as my tenure as Chairman of the AOS began. Maybe the demise of Osprey is a sign for me to move on, but first I must thank the joint editors of Osprey from inception, Simon Strickland (AOS) and Mike Blair (RAFOS), for their magnificent achievements over the years in providing such a first class magazine. Actually I am not going to hand over, not yet, as we are certain that the way the AOS Bulletin has progressed under its current editor, Andrew Bray, gives us a cheaper alternative and one which I wish to promote. We therefore have decided, for 2008 at least, to provide a new single publication with two parts reflecting both the differences and the synergy between Osprey and The Bulletin. A vote at our AGM in the Summer confirmed that this new magazine would be entitled The Adjutant (which was last published in 2000), headed with our re-energised logo, the more upright Adjutant Stork.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Conflict Between Migratory Birds and the Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region 2 AEWA/CMS Technical Series No
    Secretariat provided by the Doc StC Inf. 7.9 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Agenda item 20 15 November 2011 th 7 MEETING OF THE AEWA STANDING COMMITTEE 26 – 27 November 2011, Bergen, Norway The Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA) and The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) AEWA/CMS Technical Series No. XX Review of the Conflict between Migratory Birds and Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region Funded by AEWA‟s cooperation-partner, RWE RR NSG, which has developed the method for fitting bird protection markings to overhead lines by helicopter. Produced by Bureau Waardenburg Boere Conservation Consultancy STRIX Ambiente e Inovação Endangered Wildlife Trust – Wildlife & Energy Program AEWA/CMS Technical Series No. XX Compiled by: Hein Prinsen1, Gerard Boere2, Nadine Píres3 & Jon Smallie4. 1. Bureau Waardenburg bv, Culemborg, the Netherlands, [email protected], www.buwa.nl 2. Boere Conservation Consultancy, Gorssel, the Netherlands, [email protected] 3. STRIX Ambiente e Inovação, Porto Salvo, Portugal, [email protected], www.strix.pt 4. Endangered Wildlife Trust (Wildlife & Energy Program), Modderfontein, South Africa, [email protected], www.ewt.org.za Milestones in the production of this review First draft: September 2011, presented to the CMS Scientific Council through correspondence and to the 10th meeting of the AEWA Technical Committee, 12-16 September 2011, Naivasha, Kenya. Second draft: November 2011, submitted to the 17th meeting of the CMS Scientific Council on 17-18 November 2011 in Bergen, Norway, the 10th Conference of the Parties to CMS on 20-25 November 2011 in Bergen, Norway and the 5th Meeting of the Parties to AEWA on 14-18 May 2012 in La Rochelle, France.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Bald Ibis from Ancient Egypt to the Presence
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.25.397570; this version posted November 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 How human intervention and climate change shaped the fate 2 of the Northern Bald Ibis from ancient Egypt to the presence: 3 an interdisciplinary approach to extinction and recovery of an 4 iconic bird species 5 6 Johannes Fritz1,2*, Jiří Janák3 7 1 Waldrappteam Conservation & Research, Mutters, Austria 8 2 Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Austria 9 3 Czech Institute of Egyptology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 10 11 *Corresponding author 12 E-mail: [email protected] (JF) 13 14 Both authors contributed equally to this work. 15 16 Abstract 17 Once widespread around the Mediterranean, the Northern Bald Ibis (Geronticus eremita) became one 18 of the rarest birds in the world. We trace the history of this species through different epochs to the 19 present. A particular focus is on its life and disappearance in ancient Egypt, where it attained the 20 greatest mythological significance as a hieroglyphic sign for ‘blessed ancestor spirits’, and on modern 21 endeavours to rewild and restore the species. The close association of the Northern Bald Ibis with 22 human culture in ancient Egypt, as in other regions, is caused by primarily two reasons, the 23 characteristic appearance and behaviour, as well as the need for open foraging areas.
    [Show full text]
  • IAGNBI Conservation and Reintroduction Workshop
    NNNooorrrttthhheeerrrnnn BBBaaalllddd IIIbbbiiisss CCCooonnnssseeerrrvvvaaatttiiiooonnn aaannnddd RRReeeiiinnntttrrroooddduuuccctttiiiooonnn WWWooorrrkkkssshhhoooppp IIIAAAGGGNNNBBBIII MMMeeeeeetttiiinnnggg IIInnnnnnsssbbbrrruuuccckkk --- 222000000333 EEEdddsss... CCC...BBBoooeeehhhmmm,,, CCC...BBBooowwwdddeeennn &&& MMM...JJJooorrrdddaaannn Northern Bald Ibis Conservation and Reintroduction Workshop Proceedings of the International Advisory Group for the Northern Bald Ibis (IAGNBI) meeting Alpenzoo Innsbruck – Tirol, July 2003. Editors: Christiane Boehm Alpenzoo Innsbruck-Tirol Weiherburggasse 37a A-6020 Innsbruck Austria [email protected] Christopher G.R. Bowden RSPB, International Research The Lodge Sandy Bedfordshire. SG19 2DL United Kingdom [email protected] Mike J.R. Jordan North of England Zoological Society Chester Zoo Chester. CH2 1LH United Kingdom [email protected] September 2003 Published by: RSPB The Lodge, Sandy Bedfordshire UK Cover picture: © Mike Jordan ISBN 1-901930-44-0 Northern Bald Ibis Conservation and Reintroduction Workshop Proceedings of the International Advisory Group for the Northern Bald Ibis (IAGNBI) meeting Alpenzoo Innsbruck – Tirol, July 2003. Eds. Boehm, C., Bowden, C.G.R. & Jordan M.J.R. Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………… 1 Participants ……………………………………………………………………. 3 IAGNBI role and committee …………………………………………………... 8 Conservation priorities ………………………………………………………… 10 Group Workshop on guidelines for Northern bald Ibis release ………………… 12 Mike Jordan, Christiane Boehm &
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Research to Conservation Action for the Northern Bald Ibis Geronticus Eremita in Morocco
    Bird Conservation International (2008) 18:S74–S90. ß BirdLife International 2008 doi:10.1017/S0959270908000403 Printed in the United Kingdom Contribution of research to conservation action for the Northern Bald Ibis Geronticus eremita in Morocco CHRISTOPHER G. R. BOWDEN, KEN W. SMITH, MOHAMMED EL BEKKAY, WIDADE OUBROU, ALI AGHNAJ and MARIA JIMENEZ-ARMESTO Summary The Northern Bald Ibis or Waldrapp Geronticus eremita is a species of arid semi-deserts and steppes, which was formerly widely distributed as a breeding bird across North Africa, the Middle East and the European Alps. Just over 100 breeding pairs now remain in the wild at two sites in Morocco whilst two further wild pairs remain in Syria. There is also a population in Turkey, which is maintained for part of the year in captivity, and a large captive population in zoos. The species is classified by IUCN as ‘Critically Endangered’, the highest threat category. The wild population has grown during the past decade, which represents the first evidence of population growth in the species’ recorded history. Conservation action in Morocco has contributed to this recovery. A large part of the contribution of research to conservation action has been to establish and document the value of simple site and species protection. Quantitative assessments of the importance of sites for breeding, roosting and foraging have helped to prevent disturbance and the loss of sites to mass-tourism development. Wardening by members of the local community have reduced disturbance by local people and others and increased the perceived value of the birds. Monitoring has suggested additional ways to improve the breeding status of the species, including the provision of drinking water and removal and deterrence of predators and competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairest Cape to Kruger 11Th – 27Th September, 2015
    Fairest Cape to Kruger 11th – 27th September, 2015 Barrier of Spears extension 27th September – 3rd October, 2015 Set Departure tour Tour leader: Charley Hesse Report by Charley Hesse. Photos by Charley Hesse & Andrew Spencer With stiff competition, Buff-spotted Flufftail was voted bird of the trip (Andrew Spencer) There many different ways to birdwatch in South Africa, and with a small group of serious birdwatchers, we had a fast pace tour and accumulated a very large number of species. With a trip list of 494 species of birds, 67 species of mammals, plus many reptiles, amphibians and butterflies, it was one of our most successful tours to date. It was especially impressive considering that this didn’t even include a pelagic (which was sadly cancelled due to weather conditions). In addition to the huge species haul, our list included most of the available endemics (including both rockjumpers and sugarbirds) plus many other seldom seen birds. As well as the obvious star birds like African Penguin and Blue Crane, we did particularly well with certain groups, with 9 species of bustard, 14 species of larks (including the very rare Rudd’s), 32 species of hawks and eagles (including Crowned Hawk-Eagle & Fasciated Snake-Eagle) and 9 species of owls (including African Grass-Owl, Cape Eagle-Owl and the Holy Grail of African birding, Pel’s Fishing Owl). Mammals feature heavily on this tour and highlights from our list included Cheetah, White & Black Rhinos, Porcupine, Meercat & Southern Rights Whales. Of course the world class reserves, stunning scenery, high-quality lodging and food plus very friendly people didn’t go unnoticed either.
    [Show full text]
  • CAVERN BIRD LIST Using Roberts 7 Names and Sequence
    Pvt Bag X1626 Bergville 3350 Tel: +27 36 438 6270 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.cavern.co.za Welcome to birders’ paradise. The Cavern boasts over 200 species, many of them easily found because all the Drakensberg habitats are accessible within walking distance. The adventure begins within the rambling, mainly indigenous gardens. They merge into Afromontane forest on one side, thornveld on another, ponds and streams in between. Grassland, Protea woodland and rock outcrops dominate the nearest hill. High above, sheer kranses complete the picture. Which birds are the stars of the show? There are lots of endemics – species found only in South Africa – Gurney’s Sugarbird, Bush Blackcap, Fairy Flycatcher – as well as rarites like Half- collared Kingfsher and Bearded Vulture. CAVERN BIRD LIST using Roberts 7 names and sequence ⃣ Coqui Francolin ⃣ Southern Ground-Hornbill ⃣ Grey-winged Francolin ⃣ African Hoopoe ⃣ Red-winged Francolin ⃣ Green Wood-Hoopoe ⃣ Red-necked Spurfowl ⃣ Half-collared Kingfisher ⃣ Swainson’s Spurfowl ⃣ Malachite Kingfisher ⃣ Common Quail ⃣ Grey-headed Kingfisher ⃣ Helmeted Guineafowl ⃣ Brown-hooded Kingfisher ⃣ Egyptian Goose ⃣ Giant Kingfisher ⃣ Spur-winged Goose ⃣ Pied Kingfisher ⃣ African Black Duck ⃣ White-fronted Bee-eater ⃣ Yellow-billed Duck ⃣ Speckled Mousebird ⃣ Greater Honeyguide ⃣ Jacobin Cuckoo ⃣ Lesser Honeyguide ⃣ Red-chested Cuckoo ⃣ Brown-backed Honeybird ⃣ Black Cuckoo ⃣ Red-throated Wryneck ⃣ Klaas's Cuckoo ⃣ Golden-tailed Woodpecker ⃣ Diderick Cuckoo ⃣ Ground Woodpecker ⃣ Alpine Swift ⃣ Cardinal
    [Show full text]
  • International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Northern Bald Ibis
    C M Y CM MY CY CMY K TECHNICAL SERIES No.10 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Northern Bald Ibis Geronticus eremita UNEP/AEWA Secretariat UN Campus Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 10 53113 Bonn Germany Tel.: +49 (0)228 815 2413 Fax: +49 (0)228 815 2450 [email protected] http://www.unep-aewa.org International Advisory Group on the Northern Bald Ibis Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA) International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Northern Bald Ibis Geronticus eremita Superseded by the fully revised version (Technical Series No. 55) November 2015 Technical Series No. 10 June 2006 Superseded by the fully revised version (Technical Series No. 55) Compiled by: Maria Jose Jimenez Armesto1, Christiane Boehm2 & Chris Bowden3 1 SEO/BirdLife, C./Melquiades Biencinto 34, 28053 Madrid, Spain 2 Alpenzoo Innsbruck, Weiherburggasse 37, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria 3 Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, UK E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Compilation of this species action plan would not have been possible without the encouragement and comments of the network of experts and representatives from national governmental agencies of the countries involved. We are grateful to Mohammed El Bekkay (Souss Massa National Park, Morocco), Steven Evans (BirdLife South Africa), Taner Hatypoglu (Ministry of Environment and Forest, Turkey), Mike Jordan (Chester Zoo, UK), Kurt Kotrschal (Konrad Lorenz Institute, Austria), Bert Lenten (AEWA), José Manuel López Vázquez (Andalucia Environmental Ministry, Spain), Alberto Madroño (SEO/BirdLife, Spain), Szabolcs Nagy (BirdLife International), Karin Pegoraro (BLU Consulting), Miguel Quevedo (Jerez Zoo, Spain), Elisa Rivera (Bern Convention), Gianluca Serra (Ex UN-FAO), José Tavares (RSPB, UK).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Wattled Ibis (Bostrychia Carunculata) in Relation to Land Use
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES College of natural sciences DEPARTMENT OF zoological Sciences ECOLOGICAL AND SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY STREAM Species diversity, The Ecology of WATTLED IBIS (BOSTRYCHIA CARUNCULATA) and land use/cover change of Chelekleka Lake, BISHOFTU BY: KALKIDAN ESAYAS Advisor : prof. Afework Bekele June, 2017 School of Graduate Studies Species diversity, the ecology of Wattled ibis (Bostrychia carunculata) and land use/cover change of Chelekleka Lake, Bishoftu A Thesis presented to the school of graduate studies of Addis Ababa University in partial fulfillments for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology (Ecological and Systematic Zoology Stream) By: Kalkidan Esayas Advisor: Prof. Afework Bekele June, 2017 iv Table of contents Content Page Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………..........I Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………………..II List of tables…………………………………………………………………………………….III List of figures……………………………………………………………………………………V List of plates…………………………………………………………………………………….VI Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………...VII 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………... 1 2. Literature Review……………………………………………………………………………..5 2.1.Taxonomy……………………………………………………………………………..6 2.2. Foraging behavior…………………………………………………………………...9 2.3. Activity pattern……………………………………………………………….........10 2.4. Nesting Ecology…………………………………………………………………....11 2.5. Breeding Ecology………………………………………………………………......12 2.6. Population………………………………………………………………………….13 2.7. Effect of land use/cover change of Chelekleka lake on Birds……………………..13
    [Show full text]