DOCSLIB.ORG

EARL MP LOVEJOY Department of Geology, the University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas Mount Rose, Northern Carson Range

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EARL MP LOVEJOY Department of Geology, the University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas Mount Rose, Northern Carson Range EARL M. P. LOVEJOY Department of Geology, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas Mount Rose, Northern Carson Range, Nevada: New Light on the Late Cenozoic Tectonic History of the Sierra Nevada from a Classic Locality Abstract: The eastern border of the northern Carson Range, at Mount Rose, is important for the study of regional Sierran tectonic and faulting chronology. There Louderback indicated that more than 5000 feet of post-Miocene-Pliocene displacements occurred along the eastern front of the Carson Range at the Mount Rose cross section. He concluded that the entire Carson Range (hence the Sierra) was uplifted as a block along that frontal fault in post-late Miocene time. The structural evidence at Mount Rose has been re-examined. It may be reinterpreted as the result of formation of a strato-volcano over a rough terrain, and its subsequent deep erosion, as contrasted with the earlier interpretation involving major fault displacement after agglomerate and flow deposition. The new structural evidence and interpretation indicates that there has been little significant faulting along the Sierra Nevada front at Mount Rose since Miocene- Pliocene volcanism. Introduction problem of Basin and Range structure (Bate- man and Eaton, 1967, p. 1413). Mount Rose, elevation 10,778 feet, is the New observations of several kinds (Curry, highest peak in the northern Carson Range, a 1966; Bateman and Eaton, 1967, p. 1413; com- north-trending spur of the Sierra Nevada pare Billings, 1960, p. 391; Christensen, 1968; (Figs. 1, 2). This is the classic locality where Thompson and Sandberg, 1958, p. 1280; Louderback (1904) first advanced evidence Lovejoy, 1964) are changing somewhat our of major (5000 feet) Pliocene-Pleistocene concepts of the timing of the structural events. ("Cascadian") frontal faulting (compare Lind- A detailed study at McGee Mountain (Fig. 1) gren, 1897). Subsequently, Louderback (1907, on the Sierra front some 135 miles south- 1924) supported this temporal interpretation southeast of Mount Rose (Lovejoy, 1964,1966, with additional observations there and in the 1968a) shows that the Sierra front at that place Basin and Range Province. Within the present is no less than 2.6 m.y. old, and none of the decade his interpretation has been further evidence precludes its being much older. supported by Thompson and White (1964) This paper reports further on work done at and widely accepted (Hunt, 1967, p. 380-381; the classical Mount Rose locality (Figs. 3, 4). Burnett, 1968, p. 3; Morrison, 1965, p. 265). In 1959 the Steamboat Hills (Fig. 5) were In spite of this apparent agreement, my work mapped on a scale of 1 mile to 1 inch; the indicates that the question of the date of major Mount Rose summit block was also studied in uplift of the Sierra Nevada is still unsettled. 1959 and 1962. Hill 9400 on the Mount Rose Although most students of this problem agree cross section was mapped by Brunton compass that vigorous differential uplift occurred in late and pacing in 1963 and restudied and cross Pliocene and early Pleistocene (Hudson, 1960) sectioned, using a plane table, in 1966 (Lovejoy, the actual amount of vertical displacement is in 1968b; Figs. 6, 7). dispute (Lydon, 1962, p. 23). Not the existence but the age of faulting along the Sierran front Acknowledgments is questioned herein. This problem is also im- My two sons, Eric C. Lovejoy and Mark T. portant because the Cenozoic uplift of the Lovejoy, assisted with the plane-table map- Sierra Nevada may be part of the broader ping. Evans B. Mayo, William McAnulty, Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 80, p. 1833-1842, 9 figs., September 1969 1833 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/80/9/1833/3417845/i0016-7606-80-9-1833.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 1834 E. M. P. LOVEJOY-MOUNT ROSE, NORTHERN CARSON RANGE, NEVADA 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 Miles . MCGee Mtn. SCALE Figure 1. Regional index map of north-central Sierra Nevada and northwestern Nevada. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/80/9/1833/3417845/i0016-7606-80-9-1833.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 NOTES AND DISCUSSIONS 1835 by a major fault. On the contrary, south of Tamarack Lake (Fig. 5) basal tuffs of the Kate Peak Formation bury a rugged granodiorite terrain with relief of several hundred to 1000 feet. In Galena Creek these tuffs were mapped as Truckee Formation by Thompson and White (1964, PI. 1; sec. 23). The Truckee Formation, however, overlies and intertongues the top of the Kate Peak volcanics; it does not underlie the flows; hence these tuffs must be the basal part of the Kate Peak. These basal tuffs extend south to the high ridge in the SE J4 sec. 23 but were not separately mapped as Truckee Formation there by Thompson and White. They also can be traced readily from the SE*4 sec. 23 to their position in Galena Creek. They have not been faulted; their difference in elevation between Galena Creek (8800 feet) and on the ridge in the SEM sec. 23 (9840 feet) is the result of deposition of the basal tuffs upon a very rugged terrain. The tuffs came from a volcano (see below) on Hill 9400. They covered the steep contact between the deeply eroded granodiorite and the andesites. Accordingly, fault No. 1 did not displace the Kate Peak Formation with respect Figure 2. Local index map of northern Carson to the granodiorite. The rugged subtuff Range, Washoe County, Nevada. granodiorite surface is evidence, however, that a preandesite scarp or cliff may have resulted from preandesite faulting extending along the western side of Mount Rose. Evidence of John Hills, and Aaron C. Waters made sug- significant postandesite displacements is lack- gestions that improved the manuscript. Miss ing; so, if a fault is present here, it must be Rachel Lopez typed it and Robert Sepulveda of pre-Kate Peak age. prepared most of the illustrations. Fault No. 2 (Thompson and White, 1964, p. A35, Fig. 15; Figs. 3, 4; this is the same Geologic Evidence along the structure described in 1904 by Louderback) was Mount Rose Cross Section also traced, but no structural evidence of a This section (Figs. 2, 5) has been constructed fault was found. The western wall similar to from the Mount Rose summit block east- many hill slopes in the granodiorite is a steep northeastward across Hill 9400 and Hill 7720 hillside (steeper than 35°) formed on gran- (Fig. 8) into sec. 2, T. 17 N., R. 19 E., hence odiorite, but grus covers the slope. At first east-southeastward across part of the Steam- glance, Hill 9400 (Figs. 3, 4) appears to be a boat Hills. The section thus consists of two down-dropped block composed of the same segments (D-D' and E-E', Fig. 5) that will be gently dipping volcanics as those seen on the discussed separately (Fig. 9). summit of Mount Rose. The dips in Hill 9400 Faults in the Carson Range. Fault No. 1 even appear to be gently westward, toward (Fig. 5) mapped by Thompson and White Mount Rose, as though the block had rotated (1964, PI. 1) extends 2 miles north-north- slightly as it dropped. This appearance is an westerly from a point in the NW^ sec. 24 to illusion; the hill itself is composed of steeply NWM sec. 11, T. 17 S., R. 18 E. I have fol- dipping dikes (Figs, 6, 7) of dense andesite. lowed this line from its southern end to the The andesite is not gently dipping flows, as trail west of Mount Rose. Unlike Thompson thought by Louderback. Moreover, there are and White, I found no evidence that the Kate andesite dikes in Hill 9400 that are dissimilar to Peak Formation, of late Miocene to early the andesite flows in the Mount Rose summit Pliocene (Mio-Pliocene) age, has been displaced block. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/80/9/1833/3417845/i0016-7606-80-9-1833.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 1836 E. M. P. LOVEJOY—MOUNT ROSE, NORTHERN CARSON RANGE, NEVADA Figure 3. View toward northwest, approximately normal to Mount Rose-Hill 9400-Steamboat Hills cross section from northern flank of Slide Mountain. Slopes A and B are the scarps considered by Louder- back and Thompson and White to have resulted from post-Kate Peak faulting. Figure 4. View toward southwest along the Mount Rose-Hill 9400-Steamboat Hills cross section from base of Carson Range. Slopes A and B correspond to those shown in Figure 3. I interpret Hill 9400 as a deeply eroded dike- slope wash, which indicates a gently eastward- zone neck of a Kate Peak strato-volcano that dipping Kate Peak agglomerate-granodiorite was composed of tuffs and flows spread out contact rather than a steep contact. This beyond a breccia-agglomerate-dike complex seems to be another depositional contact slop- near the vent. Hematite veins, hematite- ing gently east eroded so as to form a cuestalike coated cinders, and andesite scoria abound in hill (7720). the top of Hill 9400. Fault No. 5 could not be found in the field. Thus, the only evidence of fault No. 2 ap- The outcrop pattern of the agglomerate on pears to be a geomorphic illusion. Thompson the granodiorite, as interpreted here, indicates and White (1964, p. A34) also state: "It is a depositional contact similar to that of the interesting to note that this fault, which was western fault but curved as the result of the described by Louderback . ., has little direct gentle eastward dip of the tuff-breccia ag- topographical expression." glomerates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan O the Sky Highway T
    Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Highway to the Sky CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE & VISION PURPOSE & VISION 1 PLAN PURPOSE 2 CORRIDOR SETTING 3 VISION & GOALS 6 STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC OUTREACH 7 CHAPTER 2: MOUNT ROSE SCENIC BYWAY’S INTRINSIC VALUES INTRINSIC VALUES 19 TERRAIN 20 OWNERSHIP 22 LAND USE & COMMUNITY RESOURCES 24 VISUAL QUALITY 26 CULTURAL RESOURCES 30 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 34 HYDROLOGY 40 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES & WILDLIFE 42 FUEL MANAGEMENT & FIRES 44 CHAPTER 3: THE HIGHWAY AS A TRANSPORTATION FACILITY TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 47 EXISTING ROADWAY CONFIGURATION 48 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES & TRENDS 49 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES 50 EXISTING BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 50 EXISTING TRAFFIC SAFETY 50 EXISTING PARKING AREAS 55 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 55 CHAPTER 4: ENHANCING THE BYWAY FOR VISITING, LIVING & DRIVING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES & ACTION ITEMS 57 PRESERVE THE SCENIC QUALITY & NATURAL RESOURCES 59 BALANCE RECREATION ACCESS WITH TRANSPORTATION 68 & SAFETY NEEDS CONNECT PEOPLE WITH THE CORRIDOR 86 PROMOTE TOURISM 94 CHAPTER 5: CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP 99 MANAGING PARTNERS 100 CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS 102 | i This Plan was funded by an On Our Way grant from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and a Federal Scenic Byway Grant from the Nevada Department of Transportation. ii | Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan CHAPTER ONE 1 PURPOSE & VISION Chapter One | 1 The Corridor PLAN PURPOSE The Mount Rose Scenic Byway is officially named the “Highway to the Management Sky” and offers travelers an exciting ascent over the Sierra Nevada from Plan identifies the sage-covered slopes of the eastern Sierra west to Lake Tahoe. Not only goals, objectives does the highway connect travelers to a variety of recreation destinations and cultural and natural resources along the Byway, it also serves as a and potential minor arterial connecting both tourists and commuters from Reno to Lake enhancements to Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) PETITION TO LIST THE SIERRA DIVERSITY AND PACIFIC RIVERS ) NEVADA MOUNTAIN YELLOW- COUNCIL ) LEGGED FROG (RANA MUSCOSA) AS ) AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER ) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Petitioners ) ________________________________ ) February 8, 2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Rivers Council formally request that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the Sierra Nevada population of the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 - 1544. These organizations also request that mountain yellow- legged frog critical habitat be designated concurrent with its listing. The petitioners are conservation organizations with an interest in protecting the mountain yellow-legged frog and all of earth’s remaining biodiversity. The mountain yellow-legged frog in the Sierra Nevada is geographically, morphologically and genetically distinct from mountain yellow legged frogs in southern California. It is undisputedly a “species” under the ESA’s listing criteria and warrants recognition as such. The mountain yellow-legged frog was historically the most abundant frog in the Sierra Nevada. It was ubiquitously distributed in high elevation water bodies from southern Plumas County to southern Tulare County. It has since declined precipitously. Recent surveys have found that the species has disappeared from between 70 and 90 percent of its historic localities. What populations remain are widely scattered and consist of few breeding adults. Declines were first noticed in the 1950's, escalated in the 1970's and 1980's, and continue today. What was recently thought to be one of the largest remaining populations, containing over 2000 adult frogs in 1996, completely crashed in the past three years; only 2 frogs were found in the same area in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Petition of Weststar Communications, Inc. CSR-3900-A
    Federal Communications Commis~ion DA 96-561 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Petition of ) ) WestStar Communications, Inc. ) CSR-3900-A ) For Modification of ADI Market of ) Reno, Nevada Television Stations ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: April 9, 1996 Released: April 17, 1996 By the Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION 1. WestStar Communications, Inc. ("WestStar") filed.the above-captioned petition pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.7 and 76.59, requesting the exclusion from the Reno, Nevada television market of the eastern portions of Placer and El Dorado Counties in California served by its Truckee, California cable system. The petition is opposed by Page Enterprises, Inc. ("Page"), licensee of station KAME-TV, and Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. ("STI"), licensee of station KTVN, Reno, Nevada. Great Western Broadcasting Corp. ("Great Western"), licensee of station KXTV, Sacramento, California filed comments in support of the petition, and WestStar filed a reply to the oppositions. BACKGROUND 2. Pursuant to Section 614 of the Communications Act, as amended (Section 4 of 1 the 1992 Cable Act ), and implementing rules adopted by the Commission in its Report and Order in MM Docket 92-259,2 a commercial television broadcast station is entitled to assert mandatory carriage rights on cable systems located within the station's market. A station's 1 Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992). See 47 U.S.C. § 614. Broadcast Signal Carriage Issues, 8 FCC Red 2965, 2976-2977 (1993). 4815 Federal Communications Commission DA 96-561 market for this pwpose is its "area of dominant influence," or ADI, as defined by the Arbitron audience research organization.3 An ADI is a geographic market designation that defines each television market exclusive of others, based on measured viewing patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal of Former Swiss Mart, Johnson Valuation Group Ltd, August 19, 2015
    A NARRATIVE APPRAISAL OF VACANT LAND (FORMER SWISS MART) LOCATED AT 8793 AND 8797 NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD KINGS BEACH, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA OWNED BY AND APPRAISED FOR PLACER COUNTY SUCCESSOR AGENCY JohnsonValuation Group, Ltd. California / Nevada Post Office Box 11430 124 McFaul Way, Ste. 201 Lake Tahoe, Nevada 89448 (775) 588-4787 August 19, 2015 Mr. Eric Findlay, Senior Project Manager Property Management Division Placer County Division of Facility Services 11476 C Avenue Auburn, CA 95603 Re: Appraisal of Vacant Land at 8793 and 8797 North Lake Boulevard, Kings Beach, Placer County, California Dear Mr. Findlay: This letter is in response to your request for a narrative appraisal of the vacant land (former Swiss Mart) located at 8793 and 8797 North Lake Boulevard in Kings Beach, Placer County, California. The subject property is identified as Placer County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 090-192-055 and 062. The subject property is under the ownership of the Successor Agency to the Placer County Redevelopment Agency. The subject property is described in detail in the accompanying appraisal report. This report sets forth pertinent data, statistics and other information considered necessary to establish the current Market Value of the subject property. The intended use of this report is for asset monitoring purposes by Placer County Successor Agency. It is further my understanding that the intended users of this report are the Placer County Successor Agency, other related agencies, and potential buyers. Any other use of this report requires the prior written authorization of this appraisal firm. www.johnsonvaluationgroup.com L15-065 – Swiss Mart JohnsonValuation Group, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Tahoe's Seven Summits
    Birds return to Lake Tahoe, page 4 Summer 2014 Drought offers TAHOE’S SEVEN SUMMITS good news, bad By Jeff Cowen news for Lake Tahoe In Depth By Jim Sloan The Lake may be this Region’s Tahoe In Depth most famous geographic feature, but it is Tahoe’s peaks that define our From the shoreline, a long-term landscapes and, at times, the course or severe drought seems to put of our lives. Daily, we glimpse them Lake Tahoe in dire straits. The water towering over our tedium, indelible recedes, streams dry up and the reminders of nature’s greatness and our shoreline beaches expand to expose own impermanence. Succumbing to a bathtub ring along the 72-mile their power, we climb them. shoreline. Some climbers are peak collectors, But from the water, things don’t “bagging” the major summits one by always look so bad. During a one. Others climb on a lark, impulsively drought, many of the pollutants joining friends and unprepared for the that affect Lake Tahoe’s clarity can’t Photo © Steve Dunleavy experience ahead. Regardless of our Pyramid Peak rises above the fog-choked Tahoe Basin. find their way to the Lake. Droughts paths, once we reach their summits, we slow down the rate of urban runoff, feel at once tiny and expansive, earth and rodents. Trees become shorter and neighborhoods. reducing erosion and the flow of fine and time stretching in all directions wider, until they disappear entirely. Our Climbers of even our most benign sediment and other water-clouding below us, the experience undeniably bodies change too.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought, Hauck Says Drought Reserves Are in Pretty Good Shape, but It Has Taken Its Toll on Area Reservoirs
    TMWA Board Meeting Wednesday, October 21, 2015 Press Clippings September 8, 2015 – October 14, 2015 Katherine Horton (Archie Clayton Middle School) 2010 Poster Art Contest – Honorable Mention, Grades 7-8 10-21-15 BOARD Agenda Item 18.E TMWA reports 9% drop in water use in August; 13 percent overall reduction in summer months • Images Print Story Published: 10:50 am Share Updated: 2:51 pm RENO, Nev. (MyNews4.com & KRNV) -- Water conservation numbers for the month of August were released by the Truckee Meadows Water Authority on Tuesday; and while August's reduction in use slipped slightly, overall conservation efforts exceeded desired targets. In an official statement, TMWA officials said customers reduced their water usage by nine percent system-wide for the month of August, compared to August 2013. Officials went on and said customer demand has fallen an average of 13 percent since May 2015 when TMWA began asking its customers for a voluntary 10 percent reduction in water use. “We set a savings goal of 5,000 acre feet of water for this season, which we are storing in upstream reservoirs for later use, if needed” said Mark Foree, TMWA’s general manager, in a statement. “With our customers’ continued focus on water conservation, I’m confident we will exceed that goal in September. Please keep up the good work and finish strong through this irrigation season. Remember, every gallon you save now can be held in upstream reservoirs, and will put us in good shape for next year,” he added. Factoring in the nine percent savings in August, approximately 4,800 acre-feet or 1.5 billion gallons of water has been saved by customers through the first four months of TMWA’s conservation campaign, official said.
    [Show full text]
  • TMWA Board Meeting
    01-20-16 BOARD Agenda Item 15 PRESS CLIPS TMWA Board Meeting Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Press Clippings December 10, 2015 – January 12, 2016 Katherine Horton (Archie Clayton Middle School) 2010 Poster Art Contest – Honorable Mention, Grades 7-8 01-20-16 BOARD Agenda Item 15 PRESS CLIPS Mt. Rose snowpack numbers give officials optimism Reported by: Jaime Hayden Email: [email protected] Print Story Published: 1/04 6:19 pm Share Updated: 1/04 6:43 pm MT. ROSE, Nev. (MyNews4.com & KRNV) -- Nevada's first snow survey of the year is in and the numbers are nothing but encouraging after four years of drought. "I'm very happy with the results for this time of year, we're still a long ways from the end of winter and hopefully we continue to get more and more storms,” said Jeff Anderson, Hydrologist with NRCS Nevada. On Monday morning, Hydrologists with the Natural Resources Conservation Service measured 54 inches of snow depth, which equals 15.9 inches of water content at the Mount Rose Summit, making current snowpack 110 percent of normal for this time of year. "Well as opposed to this time last year where it looked like we were just continuing the same pattern that we had seen the previous three years. I can say we are in a different trajectory, we are above average for this time of year,” said Anderson. A year ago, snowpack in the area was nearly half of what it is now, at just 60 percent of normal. And although we're above average for this time of year, hydrologists say we'll need a lot more snow to help our water supply this year.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Reception by Channel Low Power TV Stations and Translators
    TV Reception By Channel Low Power TV Stations and Translators California - Colorado - Connecticut - Delaware - District of Columbia HD Channels underlined, with bold faced italic print Highlighted with LIGHT BLUE background. SD 16:9 Widescreen Channels with Regular print LT GRAY Updated February 2015 SPANISH Language channels in RED NOTES: CP = Construction Permit App = Application + = proposed new facility Mileage given from TV transmitter for protected coverage service under average conditions at least 50% of the time. d Notation after "Miles" indicates that the coverage pattern is directional, and overall numbers are approximate. Actual coverage will depend upon terrain between the transmitter and receive location, as well as any local obstructions. Distant reception can be enhanced with elevated antenna locations, as well as specialized antennas and preamplifiers. Compiled by MIKE KOHL at GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS in Plain, Wisconsin Please E-Mail any corrections to: [email protected] We appreciate any information found by local observation of live signals. CALIFORNIA TV Reception By Channel Full & Low Power Stations & Translators Redding DIG Range CH Call Network Community (Transmitter) Lat-N Long-W Miles Digital Subchannels 5 K05ET-D NBC Alturas-Likely (Likely Mountain) 41 09 19 120 33 45 36 2.1 KOTI-NBC 2.2 This TV 20 K20DE-D PBS Alturas-Likely (Likely Mountain) 41 09 18 120 33 46 21-d 9.1 KIXE-PBS 9.2 Create 9.3 World 7 KASC-CA Azteca Am Atascadero (SW) (Tassajera Peak) 35 26 47 120 42 58 analog 7 KASC-Azteca Am 39 + KASC-CD Azteca
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory and Baseline Monitoring of the Butterfly Fauna of the Carson Range, with Emphasis on the Lake Tahoe Basin Nevada State and Adjacent Lands
    FY 2007 LAKE TAHOE LICENSE PLATE PROGRAM BUTTERFLY INVENTORY PROJECT An Inventory and Baseline Monitoring of the Butterfly Fauna of the Carson Range, with Emphasis on the Lake Tahoe Basin Nevada State and Adjacent Lands DRAFT REPORT Principal Investigators: T. Will Richardson, PhD. and Dennis D. Murphy, PhD. Department of Biology University of Nevada, Reno Contact: Will Richardson 16810 Glenshire Dr. Truckee, CA 96161 530.412.2792 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Focal sites........................................................................................................................ 4 Sampling methods:...................................................................................................... 4 General collection ........................................................................................................... 6 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................... 6 The Carson Range Butterfly Fauna ................................................................................. 6 Focal Site Sampling .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Equalization, Washoe County, Nevada, February 22, 2006
    BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA WEDNESDAY 1:00 P.M FEBRUARY 22, 2006 PRESENT: Steven Sparks, Chairman Pat McAlinden, Vice Chairman Thomas Koziol, Member John Krolick, Member* Gary Schmidt, Member* Amy Harvey, County Clerk Leslie Admirand, Deputy District Attorney Peter Simeoni, Deputy District Attorney Ron Sauer, Senior Appraiser Gary Warren, Senior Appraiser The Board met pursuant to a recess taken on February 21, 2006, in the Washoe County Administration Complex, Health Department Conference Room B, 1001 East Ninth Street, Reno, Nevada. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sparks, the Clerk called the roll, and the Board conducted the following business: WITHDRAWN PETITIONS The following petitions scheduled on today's agenda have been withdrawn by the Petitioners: Hearing No. 0049A, Reno Retail Company LLC, Parcel No. 049-230-39 Hearing No. 0050A, Reno Retail Company LLC, Parcel No. 049-230-40 Hearing No. 0070, Worldmark, The Club Reno, I.D. No. 2/680-032 SWEARING IN WITNESSES County Clerk Amy Harvey administered the Oath to Appraiser Mark Stafford and Ken Johns, State Department of Taxation. *1:02 p.m. Member Krolick arrived at the meeting. CONSOLIDATION OF HEARINGS Chairman Sparks announced there would be no consolidated hearings for the February 22, 2006 meeting. FEBRUARY 22, 2006 PAGE 391 06-80E ROLL CHANGE REQUESTS – DECREASES Following review and discussion, on motion by Member Sparks, seconded by Member Krolick, which motion duly carried with Member Schmidt absent, it was ordered that Roll Change Requests Nos. 21 through 23, resulting in decreases and placed on file with the Clerk, be approved for the reasons stated thereon.
    [Show full text]