DOCSLIB.ORG

KBSRA Existing Conditions Rpt for Website.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KBSRA Existing Conditions Rpt for Website.Pdf Kings Beach State Recreation Area Resources Inventory and Existing Conditions Report PREPARED FOR California Department of Parks and Recreation 1416 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 and California Tahoe Conservancy 1061 Third Street South Lake Tahoe, California 96150 PREPARED BY Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 June 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ vii 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Resources Inventory and Existing Conditions Report ..................................... 1-2 2 REGIONAL LAND USE, FACILITIES, AND DEMOGRAPHICS .................................................... 2-1 2.1 Regional Land Use .......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Regional Recreation Facilities ....................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Regional Demographics ............................................................................................................... 2-17 3 KBSRA LAND USE AND FACILITIES ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 KBSRA Land Use .............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Visitor Profile ................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Recreation Uses and Facilities ....................................................................................................... 3-5 3.4 Utilities and Service Systems ....................................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Transportation and Circulation ................................................................................................... 3-14 4 SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE VALUES .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Water Quality and Hydrology ................................................................................................. 4.1-1 4.2 Natural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 4.2-1 4.3 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................... 4.3-1 4.4 Climate and Climate Change .................................................................................................... 4.4-1 4.5 Soils and Geology ....................................................................................................................... 4.5-1 4.6 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 4.6-1 4.7 Scenic and Aesthetic Resources .................................................................................................. 4.7-1 4.8 Noise and Auditory Resources ................................................................................................... 4.8-1 5 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Facility Management ...................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Visitor Services and Safety ........................................................................................................... 5-2 6 PARK SUPPORT AND PARTNERSHIPS .................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Department of Parks and Recreation and California Tahoe Conservancy .......................... 6-1 6.2 Concessions ....................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Volunteers and Local Partners ...................................................................................................... 6-2 7 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 7-1 California Department of Parks and Recreation Kings Beach State Recreation Area California Tahoe Conservancy i Resources Inventory and Existing Conditions Report Table of Contents Ascent Environmental Exhibits Exhibit 1-1 KBSRA Location ................................................................................................................................ 1-2 Exhibit 1-2 KBSRA Boundaries ........................................................................................................................... 1-3 Exhibit 2-1 Regional Location ............................................................................................................................ 2-4 Exhibit 2-2 Existing Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 2-6 Exhibit 2-3 Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 2-7 Exhibit 2-4a Recreation 1 ..................................................................................................................................... 2-9 Exhibit 2-4b Recreation 2 ................................................................................................................................... 2-11 Exhibit 2-4c Recreation 3 ................................................................................................................................... 2-13 Exhibit 3-1 KBSRA Boundaries ........................................................................................................................... 3-2 Exhibit 3-2 Recreational Facilities ..................................................................................................................... 3-5 Exhibit 3-3 Existing Facilities .............................................................................................................................. 3-7 Exhibit 3-4 Basketball Court .............................................................................................................................. 3-8 Exhibit 3-5 Playground ....................................................................................................................................... 3-8 Exhibit 3-6 Boat Ramp ........................................................................................................................................ 3-9 Exhibit 3-7 Pier ................................................................................................................................................... 3-10 Exhibit 3-8 KBSRA Water Consumption Rates, August 2011 – March 2016 ......................................... 3-11 Exhibit 3-7 Hourly Vehicle Volume on SR 28 ................................................................................................ 3-15 Exhibit 3-8 Hourly Vehicle Volume at SR 28/Coon Street Intersection ................................................... 3-16 Exhibit 4.1-1 Watersheds ................................................................................................................................ 4.1-10 Exhibit 4.1-2 FEMA Floodplain in Study Area ............................................................................................. 4.1-13 Exhibit 4.1-3 On-Site Stormwater Treatment ............................................................................................... 4.1-14 Exhibit 4.1-4a Stormwater 1 ............................................................................................................................. 4.1-15 Exhibit 4.1-4b Stormwater 2 ............................................................................................................................. 4.1-16 Exhibit 4.2-1 Land Cover ................................................................................................................................. 4.2-13 Exhibit 4.2-2 Fish Habitat ................................................................................................................................ 4.2-14 Exhibit 4.4-1 Wildfire Risk ................................................................................................................................. 4.4-7 Exhibit 4.4-2 Snow Pack ..................................................................................................................................... 4.4-8 Exhibit 4.4-3 Precipitation .................................................................................................................................. 4.4-9 Exhibit 4.5-1 Soils ................................................................................................................................................. 4.5-8 Exhibit 4.5-2 Coverage ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 Is a Mountainous, Deeply Dissected, and Westerly Tilting Fault Block
    5 . S i e r r a N e v a d a Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 is a mountainous, deeply dissected, and westerly tilting fault block. It is largely composed of granitic rocks that are lithologically distinct from the sedimentary rocks of the Klamath Mountains (78) and the volcanic rocks of the Cascades (4). A Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, Vegas, Reno, and Carson City areas. Most of the state is internally drained and lies Literature Cited: high fault scarp divides the Sierra Nevada (5) from the Northern Basin and Range (80) and Central Basin and Range (13) to the 2 2 . A r i z o n a / N e w M e x i c o P l a t e a u east. Near this eastern fault scarp, the Sierra Nevada (5) reaches its highest elevations. Here, moraines, cirques, and small lakes and quantity of environmental resources. They are designed to serve as a spatial within the Great Basin; rivers in the southeast are part of the Colorado River system Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the Ecoregion 22 is a high dissected plateau underlain by horizontal beds of limestone, sandstone, and shale, cut by canyons, and United States (map): Washington, D.C., USFS, scale 1:7,500,000. are especially common and are products of Pleistocene alpine glaciation. Large areas are above timberline, including Mt. Whitney framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and those in the northeast drain to the Snake River.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for the Review and Oversight of the TRPA and the Marlette Lake Water System
    STATE OF NEVADA Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Steve Sisolak, Governor Bradley Crowell, Director Charles Donohue, Administrator MEMORANDUM DATE: December 11, 2019 TO: Committee for the Review and Oversight of the TRPA and the Marlette Lake Water System THROUGH: Charles Donohue, Administrator FROM: Meredith Gosejohan, Tahoe Program Manger SUBJECT: California spotted owls in Nevada The following information on the California spotted owl in Nevada is in response to questions from the Committee during the meeting held on November 19, 2019. Currently, there is only one known nesting pair of spotted owls in the State of Nevada. The pair were discovered in Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park in 2015 and have occupied the same territory every year since. The territory is monitored annually by the Nevada Tahoe Resource Team’s (NTRT) biologist from the Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW). The pair has successfully fledged one juvenile from the nest in three different years: 2015, 2017, and 2018. There have also been five documented incidental spotted owl sightings in other parts of the Carson Range since 2015. These spotted owls are a subspecies called the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis). There are two other subspecies in the western United States (Northern and Mexican), both of which are federally listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The California spotted owl was recently petitioned for federal listing as well, but the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) announced in November 2019, that listing was not warranted at this time. (Click here to read the decisions summary) Spotted owls are native to the Tahoe Basin, though they have been relatively rare on the Nevada side and are typically observed on the California side or other parts of the Sierra Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Direction
    LTBMU Forest Plan IV. Management Direction A . Introduction .................................................... B . Forest Goals and Predicted Future Condition ..................... 1v-1 C . Forest Objectives - Average Annual Outputs .................... 1v-11 . Forestwide Summary of Acreage Allocations by Management ............................................. E . Management Practices and Forestwide Standards and Guidelines .... F . Management Prescriptions ....................................... G . Management Area Direction ...................................... 1. Blackwood .................................................. 1v-57 2 . Desolation ................................................. 3 . East Shore Beaches .......................................... Echo Lakes .................................................. 5 . Emerald Bay ................................................. 6 . Fallen Leaf ................................................. 7 . ....................................................... 8 . Genoa Peak ................................................ IV-101 . Heavenly .................................................. 10 . Lower Truckee River ........................................ 11 . Marlette ................................................... 12 . Martis ..................................................... McKinney ................................................... 14. Meeks ...................................................... Meiss ...................................................... 16. Mt. Rose
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 30, Fall 2006
    TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST Preserving and protecting important historic, recreational and scenic open Fall Newsletter spaces in the greater Truckee region. Volume 30 ❖ Fall 2006 Fall 2006 Newsletter Page 2 WHEN IT RAINS, IT POURS Maybe it’s a sign of the times The Truckee Donner Land Trust was or just plain dumb luck, but founded in 1990 in order to preserve whatever the reason, there sure and protect important historic, seems to be a lot of important recreational and scenic open spaces acreage for sale right now. in the greater Truckee region. Properties the Land Trust has eyed for years are now suddenly P.O. Box 8816, Truckee, CA 96162 for sale. So many in fact, we 10069 West River Street, Old Tonini House questioned our capacity to fund I can however, talk in Tel. 530.582.4711 them all. But in the end, Board generalities. The lands we are Fax 530.582.5528 and staff concluded that all pursuing and “have not gone email: [email protected] of these lands are simply too website: www.tdlandtrust.org public with” have a combined important not to protect. We’d be value of over $40,000,000. They remiss of our mission not to try; The Truckee Donner Land Trust is a total over 6,000 acres. 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organization. All future generations will not easily donations to the Land Trust are tax- forgive us if these lands are lost Most of these properties are of deductible under the Internal Revenue to development. To paraphrase significant acreage with names Service Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Summary Report for Sierra Nevadas, California: Chico NE, SE
    \ FIElD TRIP SUMMARY FOR SIERRA NEVADAS, CALIFORNIA CHICO NE, SE AND SACRAMENTO NE I. INTRODUCTION Field reconnaissance of the work area is an integral part for the accurate interpretation of aerial photography. Photographic signatures are compared to the actual wetland's appearance in the field by observing vegetation, soil and topo~raphy. This information is weighted with seasonality and conditIOns at both dates of photography and ground truthing. The project study area was located in northern California's Sierra Nevada Mountains. Ground truthing covered the area of each 1:100,000: Chico NE, Chico SE, and Sacramento NE. This field summary describes the data we were able to collect on the various wetland sites and the plant communities observed. II. FIELD MEMBERS Barbara Schuster Martel Laboratories, Inc. Dennis Peters U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service III. FIELD DATES July 27 - August 2, 1988 IV. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY Type: Color Infrared Transparencies Scale: 1:58,000 V. COLLATERAL DATA U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangles Soil Survey of HI Dorado Area. California, 1974. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Soil Survey of Nevada County Area. California, 1975. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. 1 Soil Survey of Sierra Valley Area. California. Parts of Sierra. Plumas. and Lassen Counties, 1975. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Soil Survey - Tahoe Basin Area. California and Nevada, 1974. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Soil Survey - Amador Area. California, 1965. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan O the Sky Highway T
    Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Highway to the Sky CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE & VISION PURPOSE & VISION 1 PLAN PURPOSE 2 CORRIDOR SETTING 3 VISION & GOALS 6 STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC OUTREACH 7 CHAPTER 2: MOUNT ROSE SCENIC BYWAY’S INTRINSIC VALUES INTRINSIC VALUES 19 TERRAIN 20 OWNERSHIP 22 LAND USE & COMMUNITY RESOURCES 24 VISUAL QUALITY 26 CULTURAL RESOURCES 30 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 34 HYDROLOGY 40 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES & WILDLIFE 42 FUEL MANAGEMENT & FIRES 44 CHAPTER 3: THE HIGHWAY AS A TRANSPORTATION FACILITY TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 47 EXISTING ROADWAY CONFIGURATION 48 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES & TRENDS 49 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES 50 EXISTING BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 50 EXISTING TRAFFIC SAFETY 50 EXISTING PARKING AREAS 55 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 55 CHAPTER 4: ENHANCING THE BYWAY FOR VISITING, LIVING & DRIVING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES & ACTION ITEMS 57 PRESERVE THE SCENIC QUALITY & NATURAL RESOURCES 59 BALANCE RECREATION ACCESS WITH TRANSPORTATION 68 & SAFETY NEEDS CONNECT PEOPLE WITH THE CORRIDOR 86 PROMOTE TOURISM 94 CHAPTER 5: CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP 99 MANAGING PARTNERS 100 CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS 102 | i This Plan was funded by an On Our Way grant from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and a Federal Scenic Byway Grant from the Nevada Department of Transportation. ii | Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan CHAPTER ONE 1 PURPOSE & VISION Chapter One | 1 The Corridor PLAN PURPOSE The Mount Rose Scenic Byway is officially named the “Highway to the Management Sky” and offers travelers an exciting ascent over the Sierra Nevada from Plan identifies the sage-covered slopes of the eastern Sierra west to Lake Tahoe. Not only goals, objectives does the highway connect travelers to a variety of recreation destinations and cultural and natural resources along the Byway, it also serves as a and potential minor arterial connecting both tourists and commuters from Reno to Lake enhancements to Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Before It Was a Park
    BEFORE IT WAS A PARK Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park and its Foundations in Comstock History Nevada Division of State Parks In honor of Nevada’s 150th anniversary 1864 to 2014 By Jay Howard, LTNSP 2014, revised 2017 A State Made by Mining Ron James wrote in his Comstock history novel The Roar and the Silence, “It was the longest telegraph ever sent, but Nevadan’s did not intend to do things in a small way. With the paperwork in order, Lincoln signed Nevada into statehood on October 31st 1864, just a few days before the November presidential election. Nevada sent back a thank-you in the form of three electoral votes for the president’s reelection.” Nevadan’s were proud of their pro-Union stance during the Civil War. Needed by the United States both politically and economically, the state of Nevada was said to have been ‘Battle Born’. Though we understand this to refer to the battles that had been raging in the east since 1861, Nevada was itself a relatively peaceful territory, other than the occasional skirmishes with Native Americans, and the more serious Pyramid Lake War of 1860. Nevadan’s never saw any fighting with Confederate forces, but certainly had their share of fistfights between Unionists and Copperheads. The latter usually losing the argument. During one incident, the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy was raised over a building in Virginia City, which led to a serious altercation between townspeople. Newspapers later reported that Unionists emerged bloody, but victorious. Early in the Civil War there was some concern that Nevada could be taken by the Confederacy, but these fears were never realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Introduction
    Carson Range Fuel Reduction and Wildfire Prevention Strategy Section 1: Introduction Purpose of this Plan This comprehensive fuels reduction and wildfire prevention plan is a unified, multi-jurisdictional strategic synopsis of the planning efforts of local, county, state, tribal, and federal entities. The proposed projects in this plan provide a 10-year strategy to reduce the risk of large and destructive wildfire in the Carson Range planning area. The plan’s outcome is to 1) propose projects that create “community defensible space”, 2) comprehensively display all proposed fuel reduction treatments, and 3) facilitate communication and cooperation among those responsible for plan implementation. If implemented, this plan will provide greater protection to the people, infrastructure, and resources in the planning area. This plan was developed to comply with the White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-432 [H.R.6111]), which amended the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-263) to include the following language: “development and implementation of comprehensive, cost-effective, multi- jurisdictional hazardous fuels reduction and wildfire prevention plans (including sustainable biomass and biofuels energy development and production activities) for the Lake Tahoe Basin (to be developed in conjunction with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency), the Carson Range in Douglas and Washoe Counties and Carson City in the State, and the Spring Mountains in the State, that are-- (I) subject to approval by the Secretary; and (II) not more than 10 years in duration” This comprehensive plan is supported by 15 partners who each have a role in wildland fuels or fire management in the planning area (see “Agencies Involved” below).
    [Show full text]
  • US Forest Service
    Regional Fact Sheet: Public Lands Operational Update Overview: As wildfire conditions around Northern California and Northern Nevada remain dangerously high, many public lands around the Tahoe-Truckee region are closed. Please see below for area closures and operational modifications. Elevated Fire Restrictions are in effect in all areas of the Tahoe Basin ● Elevated Fire Season Restrictions prohibit the burning of wood and charcoal on public or private property including residential properties, vacation/short-term rentals, campgrounds, resorts and other recreational areas throughout the Lake Tahoe/Truckee Region until the end of November or until rescinded, including all at California State Parks and USFS sites across the Tahoe Basin. ● Watch for and heed Red Flag fire warnings. When a Red Flag is in effect, all sources of outdoor open flame, including gas/propane/pellet grills and smokers on all private and public lands are banned throughout the Lake Tahoe/Truckee Region. ● Additionally, on all USFS lands all ignition sources are prohibited, including anything with a flame, until further notice. These orders are in place to protect everyone during the current state of wildfire activity and limited fire response resources and will remain in place until further notice. California State Parks: Due to the current state wildfire crisis, the closure of neighboring USFS lands, and COVID-19 and its impacts on Parks personnel to support basic operations, the following are in place: ● Campfires and charcoal BBQs are banned on all park lands. ● Does not currently allow walk-ins at any campgrounds for the remainder of the season and will be closing all remaining campgrounds on October 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) PETITION TO LIST THE SIERRA DIVERSITY AND PACIFIC RIVERS ) NEVADA MOUNTAIN YELLOW- COUNCIL ) LEGGED FROG (RANA MUSCOSA) AS ) AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER ) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Petitioners ) ________________________________ ) February 8, 2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Rivers Council formally request that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the Sierra Nevada population of the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 - 1544. These organizations also request that mountain yellow- legged frog critical habitat be designated concurrent with its listing. The petitioners are conservation organizations with an interest in protecting the mountain yellow-legged frog and all of earth’s remaining biodiversity. The mountain yellow-legged frog in the Sierra Nevada is geographically, morphologically and genetically distinct from mountain yellow legged frogs in southern California. It is undisputedly a “species” under the ESA’s listing criteria and warrants recognition as such. The mountain yellow-legged frog was historically the most abundant frog in the Sierra Nevada. It was ubiquitously distributed in high elevation water bodies from southern Plumas County to southern Tulare County. It has since declined precipitously. Recent surveys have found that the species has disappeared from between 70 and 90 percent of its historic localities. What populations remain are widely scattered and consist of few breeding adults. Declines were first noticed in the 1950's, escalated in the 1970's and 1980's, and continue today. What was recently thought to be one of the largest remaining populations, containing over 2000 adult frogs in 1996, completely crashed in the past three years; only 2 frogs were found in the same area in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Documentation of Spatial Data Bases for the Lake Tahoe Basin, California and Nevada
    Development and Documentation of Spatial Data Bases for the Lake Tahoe Basin, California and Nevada UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4182 Prepared in cooperation with the TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY U.S. GEOLCGICAL SURVEY RE:1>TON, VA. FEB 2 2 1994 sR LIBRARY - • • l'!;-•..";1":: • • - • • • • , • t • • :•• • .17 Development and Documentation of Spatial Data Bases for the Lake Tahoe Basin, California and Nevada By Kenn D. Cartier, Lorri A. Peltz, and J. LaRue Smith U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4182 Prepared in cooperation with the TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY Carson City, Nevada 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ROBERT M. HIRSCH, Acting Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Box 25286, MS 517 Carson City, NV 89706-0866 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0046 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and Scope 4 General Description of Lake Tahoe Basin 4 Previous Investigations 4 Description of Geographic Information Systems and Computer Equipment 4 Acknowledgments 5 Sources of Geographic Information 5 Sources of Thematic Data 5 Geologic Maps 5 Soil Maps 5 Timber-Type Maps 7
    [Show full text]