DOCSLIB.ORG

CMR Template.Docx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CMR Template.Docx International Communications Market Report 2014 3 3 Television and audio-visual 115 Contents Section Page 3.1 Key market developments in the TV and audio-visual markets 117 3.1.1 Industry metrics and summary 117 3.1.2 Global TV revenues up 3.1% in 2013, driven by continued growth in subscription revenues 118 3.1.3 Digital take-up slows as more countries reach switchover 119 3.1.4 Consumers continue to embrace value-added services 122 3.1.5 Types of content viewed through internet-enabled devices 133 3.1.6 TV owners in the UK are the most aware of the watershed 136 3.2 The TV and audio-visual industries 138 3.2.1 Summary 138 3.2.2 Television revenues among comparator countries 138 3.2.3 TV revenue per head among comparator countries 142 3.2.4 TV licence fee in UK third-highest among ICMR countries 144 3.2.5 Mixed picture for advertising revenue among free-to-view broadcasters 145 3.2.6 Subscription revenues continue to rise for most pay-TV operators 145 3.2.7 The continued growth of UK TV exports 148 3.3 TV and audio-visual consumers 150 3.3.1 Summary 150 3.3.2 Digital television take-up on main sets 150 3.3.3 Take-up of HDTV services 155 3.3.4 Pay-TV take-up 157 3.3.5 Use of online subscription TV and film streaming services 160 3.3.6 Broadcast television viewing 161 116 3.1 Key market developments in the TV and audio-visual markets 3.1.1 Industry metrics and summary The TV and audio-visual chapter focuses on three topics – key market developments in the sector; industry revenue; and trends among TV and audio-visual consumers. It includes a global overview and country-level analyses of the 17 comparator countries. • Key market developments details some of the major TV and audio-visual industry trends during the past year, with analysis of global revenue, take-up of digital TV and trends in online TV viewing. • The TV and audio-visual industries section focuses on key revenue trends among comparator countries, including the financial results of major pay-TV and free-to-air broadcasters. • The TV and audio-visual consumer section examines patterns of digital television take-up, including adoption of high-definition television services and digital video recorders. This section also examines how viewers in different countries consume broadcast television channels and TV online. Figure 3.1 TV industry metrics: 2013 UK FRA GER ITA USA JPN AUS ESP NED SWE POL SGP KOR BRA RUS IND CHN NGA TV revenue (£bn) 13.4 8.8 18.9 6.7 110.2 20.6 4.6 3.0 2.6 1.9 2.2 0.6 5.2 12.1 4.3 5.0 20.6 0.5 Revs change (% YOY) 3.4% 0.4% 2.5% -4.5% 2.0% 2.3% 3.4% -6.2% 1.5% 2.0% -1.3% 3.5% 5.8% 15.8% 13.6% 15.0% 16.6% 19.5% Revenue per cap (£) 210 134 230 109 348 162 199 63 158 202 57 110 106 61 30 4 15 3 from subscription 92 57 66 41 193 56 60 28 82 97 38 44 67 33 8 2 7 2 from public funds 59 35 105 25 0 32 33 5 29 43 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 from advertising 58 41 59 44 155 74 106 30 47 62 18 67 32 28 22 1 8 1 TV licence fee¹ 145.50 113.00 183.32 96.43 0.00 91.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 203.87 46.88 0.00 17.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Platform Dsat IPTV Dsat DTT Dcab Dcab DTT DTT Dcab Acab Dsat DTT Acab Asat Dsat Acab Dcab Dsat Largest TV % of platform homes 42% 40% 43% 73% 40% 51% 70% 76% 48% 27% 58% 37% 29% 34% 34% 43% 39% 71% DTV take-up (%) 100% 95% 68% 100% 95% 100% 100% 99% 86% 73% 85% 100% 71% 36% 61% 56% 75% 84% Pay TV take-up (%) 52.8% 76.3% 57.1% 33.0% 84.1% 69.8% 29.1% 22.0% 98.5% 83.8% 84.2% 62.9% 93.9% 30.6% 68.4% 98.8% 61.0% 17.8% DSO date 2012 2011 2008 2012 2009 2012 2013 2010 2006 2007 2013 2020 2012 2018 2018 2017 2015 2016 TV viewing (min/day) 232 226 221 261 293 265 201 244 195 159 247 n/a 217 217 239 n/a 159 n/a Source: IHS/ industry data/ Ofcom The key market developments seen during the past year include: • Global TV revenues (including broadcast advertising, subscriptions and public licence fees only) increased by 3.1% in 2013 to reach £254bn. Subscription revenues continue to be the key driver of this growth, rising by 4.4% to reach £127bn, exactly half of the total. Advertising and licence fee revenues grew by1.9% and 1.6% respectively in 2013. • The UK is one of only five countries to have 100% of all main TV sets receiving digital TV (DTV) in 2013, along with Italy, Japan, Australia and Singapore. 117 • Consumers continue to embrace HDTV, although take-up of 3DTV services is slow. The UK equals the US in HDTV take-up, with 70% of respondents claiming to own a high-definition set, while 45% and 53% of consumers in the UK and US respectively claim to have an HDTV service. However, only 5% (UK) and 4% (US) of consumers claim to have a 3DTV service. • Almost a quarter of UK consumers claim to have a smart TV, with the vast majority (84%) having connected their TV and used the internet functionality. • A third of the online population in the UK use the internet to watch TV programmes or films at least once a week. UK viewers are more likely to watch TV programmes than films online. • Viewing of TV programmes and films in the UK is primarily driven by free-to- access broadcaster services, which have the highest levels of use across all countries researched. Subscription VoD services through a non-broadcaster are used more regularly in the UK than in other European comparator countries. 3.1.2 Global TV revenues up 3.1% in 2013, driven by continued growth in subscription revenues Global TV revenues increased by 3.1% in 2013 Ofcom estimates that global TV revenues increased in 2013 by 3.1% year on year, to £254bn. Global TV revenues have increased by 5.1% over the four-year period since 2009. Our analysis of global television revenues incorporates the three main components: net broadcast advertising revenue, TV licence fees and subscriptions. It excludes revenues generated from pay-per-view (PPV), video on demand (VoD) and over the top/streaming (OTT) services. Figure 3.2 Global TV revenues Revenue (£bn) 300 YOY CAGR £246bn £254bn (4yr) 250 £236bn £225bn £208bn 3.1% 5.1% 200 150 100 50 - 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Data derived from PwC Global Entertainment and Media Outlook: 2014-2018 @ www.pwc.com/outlook. Notes: Ofcom is responsible for all growth calculations displayed. Ofcom uses an exchange rate of $1.563 to the GBP in line with the IMF average for 2013. 118 Growth was driven primarily by continued growth in subscription revenues The 3.1% increase in global television revenues; to £254bn in 2013, was driven primarily by continued growth in subscription revenues, which made up exactly half of the total included revenue. Advertising and licence fee revenues grew at a more modest 1.9% and 1.6% respectively in 2013. Global subscription revenues increased for the fourth year in a row, from £122bn in 2012 to £127bn in 2013; a year-on-year increase of 4.4%. Global net advertising revenues (NAR) growth has been steady since 2011 following a rise in 2010 as economic conditions stabilised. The steady recovery in NAR has been sustained in 2013, with revenues increasing 1.9% (or £2bn) to £103bn. As in the three previous years, public funding from TV licence fees saw little change in 2013 and remained around £24bn. Revenue from this source has changed little over the four-year period, increasing by just 1.5% per year on an average compound basis. Figure 3.3 Global TV industry revenues, by source % of revenues £208bn £225bn £236bn £246bn £254bn 100% YOY CAGR (4yr) 80% £84bn £93bn £97bn £101bn £103bn 1.9% 5.3% Advertising 1.6% 1.5% Public TV license fees 60% £23bn £24bn £23bn £24bn £24bn 4.4% 5.7% Subscriptions 40% 3.1% 5.1% All £102bn £109bn £116bn £122bn £127bn 20% 0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Data derived from PwC Global Entertainment and Media Outlook: 2014-2018 @ www.pwc.com/outlook. Notes: Ofcom is responsible for all growth calculations displayed. Ofcom uses an exchange rate of $1.563 to the GBP in line with the IMF average for 2013 3.1.3 Digital take-up slows as more countries reach switchover The UK was one of only five countries where 100% of all main TV sets received digital TV (DTV) in 2013. In 2013, take-up of digital television (DTV)67 continued to slow overall. In only five comparator countries - France, Poland, Singapore, India and China - did the proportion of primary TV sets receiving DTV increase more quickly in 2013 than in 2012.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distribution in Italy
    Distribution/Exhibition I 39 TOTAL Theatrical Distributors (24 considering continuity) Very high competition -> high MG 5 US (FOX, BVI, SONY, UIP, WARNER) 2 Italian Distributors part of a broadcasting group 01 Distribution -> owned by RAI Medusa -> same group as MEDIASET 1 State-owned Distributor (Istituto Luce) Distribution/Exhibition II Market share first 10 distributors 2005 MS% UIP 20,1 Warner 14,1 Medusa 10,5 01 Distribution 10,1 First five Buena Vista 9,0 = 63,8% Eagle Pictures 7,4 Sony Pictures 6,7 Filmauro 6,2 Fox 6,0 BIM 1,8 Total 91,9 Distribution/Exhibition III First 20 distributors (independent in bold) UIP 20,1 Lucky Red 1,7 Warner 14,1 Istituto Luce 1,3 Medusa 10,5 Mikado 1,3 01 Distribution 10,1 Moviemax 0,7 Buena Vista 9,0 IIF 0,7 Eagle Pictures 7,4 Mediafilm 0,6 Sony Pictures 6,7 Fandango 0,5 Filmauro 6,2 Nexo 0,4 Fox 6,0 Lady Film 0,2 BIM 1,8 Teodora 0,2 Market share indp distributors: 21,7% Distribution/Exhibition IV Horizontal/Vertical Integration Medusa (Theatrical, HV) -> Mediaset (Free TV) -> Medusa (theatres) 01 (Theatrical, HV)-> RAI (Free TV) Independent: Circuito Cinema (100 theatres controlled by independent distributors) Cinecittà Holding (lab, theatres, fund, distributor) National Exhibitors: distribution or production companies? Nexo (from exhibition to distribution) Lumière (from exhibition to production) Distribution/Exhibition V American Majors directly operating in: Distribution (Warner, Fox, Sony, Buena Vista, UIP) Production (Warner, Sony) Multiplex (Warner, UCI ex-USA) Distribution/Exhibition VI Exhibition
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Switching-Triggered Charging for Pay-TV Over IPTV
    Channel Switching-Triggered Charging for Pay-TV over IPTV vom Fachbereich Informatik der Technischen Universitat¨ Darmstadt genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) von Dipl.-Inform. Tolga Arul geboren in Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland Referenten der Arbeit: Prof. Dr. Sorin A. Huss Technische Universitat¨ Darmstadt Asst. Prof. Dr. Abdulhadi Shoufan Khalifa University Abu Dhabi Prof. Dr. Stefan Katzenbeisser Technische Universitat¨ Darmstadt Tag der Einreichung: 18.08.2016 Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 06.10.2016 Darmstadter¨ Dissertation D 17 Darmstadt 2017 EHRENWÖRTLICHE ERKLÄRUNG Hiermit versichere ich, die vorliegende Arbeit ohne Hilfe Dritter und nur mit den ange- gebenen Quellen und Hilfsmitteln angefertigt zu haben. Alle Stellen, die aus den Quellen entnommen wurden, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht worden. Diese Arbeit hat in glei- cher oder ahnlicher¨ Form noch keiner Prufungsbeh¨ orde¨ vorgelegen. Darmstadt, 18. August 2016 Tolga Arul CHANNEL SWITCHING-TRIGGERED CHARGING FOR PAY-TV OVER IPTV To my family CONTENTS List of Figures vii List of Tables xi Acknowledgments xv Acronyms xvii 1 Introduction1 1.1 Context2 1.1.1 Pricing for Information Goods4 1.1.2 Charging Models for Pay-TV7 1.2 Short-Interval Charging 10 1.2.1 Consumer Opportunities 10 1.2.2 Consumer Challenges 11 1.2.3 Network Operator Opportunities 12 1.2.4 Network Operator Challenges 14 1.3 Objectives and Organization 15 2 Prospects 19 2.1 Market Participants 20 2.2 Market Background 21 2.3 Consumer Perspective
    [Show full text]
  • Senderliste-Digital-Tv.Pdf
    Zusatz-Pakete Alle Preise pro Monat. Premium CHF 33.– Entertainment CHF 22.– Sports CHF 11.– 2 Monate1) gratis Im Premium-Paket erhalten Sie alles in einem: Plus, Entertainment, Sports und den Erotik-Sender Blue Hustler. 188 Nicktoons 271 Eurosport 1 HD 189 Cartoon Netw. HD d/e 272 Eurosport 2 HD 190 Boomerang HD d/e 274 sport1+ HD 194 Fix & Foxi 275 sportdigital HD CHF 5.– Plus 197 Nick Jr. 278 Auto Motor & Sport HD 201 Animal Planet HD 279 Motors TV HD d/f/e Deutschsprachige Sender Weitere Sprachen 202 Nat Geo Wild HD d/e 282 sport 1 US HD e 100 RTL HD 448 Extremadura SAT spa 203 Nat Geo HD d/e 285 Extreme Sports Channel d/f/e 101 SAT.1 HD 494 CT24 Czech News cze 204 Discovery HD 286 Fast&FunBox HD e 102 ProSieben HD 497 Duna TV HD hun PLANET 205 HD Planet HD 287 FightBox HD e 103 VOX HD 498 TVRi Romania Int. rum 206 GEO Television HD d/e 290 Nautical Channel HD e/f 104 RTL 2 HD 501 Slovenija 1 slv 212 Travel Channel HD d/e 105 kabel eins HD 508 Z1 TV Sljeme hrv 219 History HD d/e 107 RTLNITRO HD 509 DM Sat srp 221 A&E d/e 108 n-tv HD 521 RTRS plus bos Adult CHF 24.– 227 Bon Gusto HD 111 Super RTL HD 522 OBN bos 295 Penthouse HD 230 E! Entertainment HD d/e 113 sixx HD 529 RTCG TV Montenegro mon 296 Blue Hustler2) 232 RTL Living HD 124 Anixe HD Serie 536 TVSH Shqiptar alb 297 Hustler TV 233 RTL Passion HD 133 Welt der Wunder 551 TRT 1 HD tur 298 Private TV 236 Romance TV HD 163 Gute Laune TV 557 Kanal D (Euro D) tur 237 Universal Channel HD d/e Sender mit 7 Tage Replay-Funktion auf Verte! TV.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Prepared for Mediaset§ 3 June 2016
    Development of the audiovisual markets and creation of original contents Report prepared for Mediaset§ 3 June 2016 Lear Via di Monserrato, 48 00186 - Rome tel. +39 06 68 300 530 fax +39 06 68 68 286 email: [email protected] § This is a working translation of the Study “Evoluzione dei mercati dell’audiovisivo e creazione di contenuti originali” dated 16 May 2016. Index 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. The audiovisual system: the birth of new models ......................................................................... 2 2.1. Media convergence ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.2. Audiovisual business models ............................................................................................................. 6 3. The regulatory asymmetry of the audiovisual markets ................................................................. 9 4. The enforcement of copyright .................................................................................................... 12 4.1. Methods and numbers in piracy ...................................................................................................... 12 4.2. Description of loss of earnings by channel of monetisation ............................................................ 15 4.3. Monitoring costs .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M E D I a S E T G R O
    M E D I A S E T G R O U P 2000: A Memorable Year ¨ Leadership in terms of audience ¨ Leadership in terms of advertising revenues ¨ Careful control of costs ¨ Development of multimedia MEDIASET GROUP 2000: A Memorable Year ¨ Free-to-air generalist television will continue to play a central role in the media system ¨ Il Grande Fratello (Big Brother): the ante-chamber of convergence ¨ Television - a bridge connecting different media MEDIASET GROUP 2000: A Memorable Year: Results ¨ Consolidated net revenues: 2,363.6 m Euro (+15.4% vs 1999) ¨ Operating profit: 691.5 m Euro (+23.4% vs 1999) ¨ EBIT Margin up from 27.3% to 30.1% ¨ Net profit: 423.5 m Euro (+ 24.9% vs 1999) MEDIASET GROUP New Media The Internet ¨ Cost-conscious investment strategy (light structure) ¨ Business approach based on interaction with and within television (TG5 & TG.COM) Thematic channels ¨ Low cost of conception and packaging MEDIASET GROUP Diversification (Television is the hub) ¨ The core business will remain at the heart of the coming transformations ¨ Viewers will become less passive more interactive ¨ Enhanced TV: agreements and alliances with telecom companies to build an integrated platform MEDIASET GROUP Regulatory Scenario March 2001: Law approved for the shift to digital terrestrial This means: ¨ A precise time frame - 2006 - for the change-over ¨ Testing to be carried out by incumbent licence-holders ¨ The possibility of buying frequencies ¨ A reserve of 60% of additional broadcasting capacity allocated to the licence-holders that launch testing MEDIASET GROUP
    [Show full text]
  • Must-Carry Rules, and Access to Free-DTT
    Access to TV platforms: must-carry rules, and access to free-DTT European Audiovisual Observatory for the European Commission - DG COMM Deirdre Kevin and Agnes Schneeberger European Audiovisual Observatory December 2015 1 | Page Table of Contents Introduction and context of study 7 Executive Summary 9 1 Must-carry 14 1.1 Universal Services Directive 14 1.2 Platforms referred to in must-carry rules 16 1.3 Must-carry channels and services 19 1.4 Other content access rules 28 1.5 Issues of cost in relation to must-carry 30 2 Digital Terrestrial Television 34 2.1 DTT licensing and obstacles to access 34 2.2 Public service broadcasters MUXs 37 2.3 Must-carry rules and digital terrestrial television 37 2.4 DTT across Europe 38 2.5 Channels on Free DTT services 45 Recent legal developments 50 Country Reports 52 3 AL - ALBANIA 53 3.1 Must-carry rules 53 3.2 Other access rules 54 3.3 DTT networks and platform operators 54 3.4 Summary and conclusion 54 4 AT – AUSTRIA 55 4.1 Must-carry rules 55 4.2 Other access rules 58 4.3 Access to free DTT 59 4.4 Conclusion and summary 60 5 BA – BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 61 5.1 Must-carry rules 61 5.2 Other access rules 62 5.3 DTT development 62 5.4 Summary and conclusion 62 6 BE – BELGIUM 63 6.1 Must-carry rules 63 6.2 Other access rules 70 6.3 Access to free DTT 72 6.4 Conclusion and summary 73 7 BG – BULGARIA 75 2 | Page 7.1 Must-carry rules 75 7.2 Must offer 75 7.3 Access to free DTT 76 7.4 Summary and conclusion 76 8 CH – SWITZERLAND 77 8.1 Must-carry rules 77 8.2 Other access rules 79 8.3 Access to free DTT
    [Show full text]
  • Will Broadband TV Shape the Future of Broadcasting?
    BROADBAND TV WillBroadband TV shape the future of broadcasting? Franc Kozamernik EBU Lieven Vermaele VRT Broadband Television (BTV) 1 is a new emerging platform for distributing digital television channels to home consumers using a TV screen. This article focuses on BTV services which use the conventional telephone infra- structure (i.e. twisted-pair copper lines). These BTV services are often called ADSL TV or DSL TV. Other delivery mechanisms such as coaxial cable, power line communications (PLC), fibre (FTTH) and wireless (UMTS, Wi-Fi and WiMAX) are not covered here. If commercially successful, Broadband TV may complement traditional DTV services – which use satellite, cable and terrestrial delivery – and may even evolve into a fourth mass-market platform for digital television services. Many telcom and cable operators are in the process of trialling BTV infrastructure and expecting that it could evolve into the next emerging market of 2005 and beyond. Some initial experiences show that the technology is quite mature, the business models potentially sound and the prospective subscribers enthusiastic. Some market analysts even anticipate explosive growth of the broadband television market. This article attempts to provide some background to BTV developments in Europe and outlines the principal areas of interest such as: (i) the current status of BTV trials, (ii) issues relating to the network and media technologies used, (iii) some content-related issues and, last but not least, (iv) some regulatory matters. Background BTV makes use of a television set rather than a PC. There are multiple commercial reasons for this. First of all, TV sets are much more popular domestic appliances than PCs.
    [Show full text]
  • RAI GROUP Reports and Financial Statements 2009
    RAI GROUP Reports and financial statements 2009 Reports and financial statements at 31.12.2009 General contents 2 Corporate Bodies 3 Organizational Structure 5 Report on operations 11 Rai 21 Rai’s offering 31 TV Division 61 Radio Division 71 New Media Division 75 Commercial Division 83 Broadcasting and DTT Division 89 Parent Company’s financial and earnings position 105 Additional information 115 Recommendation to Shareholders 117 Rai SpA financial statements at 31 December 2009 189 Shareholders’ Meeting 191 Consolidated financial statements of the Rai Group at 31 December 2009 271 Financial statements of Subsidiaries 323 Corporate Directory 2 Corporate Bodies Board of Directors (until 25 March 2009) (from 25 March 2009) Chairman Claudio Petruccioli Paolo Garimberti Directors Giovanna Bianchi Clerici Giovanna Bianchi Clerici Angelo Maria Petroni Rodolfo De Laurentiis Nino Rizzo Nervo Alessio Gorla Carlo Rognoni Angelo Maria Petroni Marco Staderini Nino Rizzo Nervo Giuliano Urbani Guglielmo Rositani Giorgio Van Straten Antonio Verro Secretary Nicola Claudio Statutory Auditors Chairman Domenico Tudini Regular auditors Gennaro Ferrara Paolo Germani Alternate auditors Rosa Grimaccia Domenico Mastroianni (until 1 April 2009) (from 2 April 2009) General Manager Claudio Cappon Mauro Masi Independent auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers (1) (1) The firm has been engaged for the audit pursuant to Article 2409-bis, as approved by the shareholders’meeting on 16/07/2007. Corporate Bodies and Organizational Structure 3 Organizational Structure Ministry
    [Show full text]
  • Drama Directory 2014
    2014 UPDATE CONTENTS Acknowlegements ..................................................... 2 Latvia .......................................................................... 122 Introduction ................................................................. 3 Lithuania ................................................................... 125 Luxembourg ............................................................ 131 Austria .......................................................................... 4 Malta .......................................................................... 133 Belgium ...................................................................... 10 Netherlands ............................................................. 135 Bulgaria ....................................................................... 21 Norway ..................................................................... 145 Cyprus ......................................................................... 26 Poland ........................................................................ 151 Czech Republic ......................................................... 31 Portugal .................................................................... 157 Denmark .................................................................... 36 Romania ................................................................... 160 Estonia ........................................................................ 42 Slovakia ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in the Must-Offer Debate? Exclusivity in Media and Communication
    LEGAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN AUDIOVISUAL OBSERVATORY Progress in the Must-offer Debate? Exclusivity in Media and Communication by Alexander Scheuer and Sebastian Schweda EDITORIAL “We’re in a good position!” This increasingly popular phrase is meant to transmit a sense of optimism; optimism that a company or branch of industry is in a position to spot opportunities in new markets or optimism that success will continue despite changes in the market. The markets involved may be defined according to geographical, technical or content-related criteria. In the audiovisual sector, for example, broadcasters are currently battling it out for a share in the various forms of distribution of audiovisual media services and the new markets that are being created as a result. In order for a company that wants to provide audiovisual media services to be well positioned, what it needs more than anything else is content that is of interest to consumers. The key to success for such a company is its ability to offer such content on an exclusive basis, in other words if it owns an exclusive right to distribute it. At the same time, however, it must also position itself in the distribution market, for it needs to send the content to the customer in order to convert its exclusive right into financial reward. This is the theme tackled by this IRIS plus, which looks at the various dimensions of exclusivity in media and communication. This IRIS plus considers the current debate on whether the obligation to transmit (must-carry) certain content should be replaced or at least supplemented by an obligation to offer such content (must-offer).
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 and Public Service Media: Impact of the Pandemic on Public Television in Europe Miguel Túñez-López; Martín Vaz-Álvarez; César Fieiras-Ceide
    Covid-19 and public service media: Impact of the pandemic on public television in Europe Miguel Túñez-López; Martín Vaz-Álvarez; César Fieiras-Ceide Nota: Este artículo se puede leer en español en: http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2020/sep/tunez-vaz-fieiras_es.pdf How to cite this article: Túñez-López, Miguel; Vaz-Álvarez, Martín; Fieiras-Ceide, César (2020). “Covid-19 and public service media: Impact of the pandemic on public television in Europe”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 5, e290518. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.18 Manuscript received on 16th June 2020 Accepted on 11th August 2020 Miguel Túñez-López * Martín Vaz-Álvarez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-9143 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-9795 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación, Facultade de Ciencias da Comunicación, Depto. de Ciencias de la Comunicación Depto. de Ciencias da Comunicación Av. de Castelao, s/n. Campus Norte Av. Castelao, s/n. Campus Norte 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain [email protected] [email protected] César Fieiras-Ceide https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5606-3236 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Grupo Novos Medios Ronda de la Muralla, 142 27004 Lugo, España [email protected] Abstract This article analyses the response of European Public Service Media to the crisis caused by Covid-19, especially the impact of the pandemic on Europe’s major public broadcasters, with a particular focus on technical and professional constraints, alterations in audience volume and habits, production strategies, type of broadcast content and journalists’ routines.
    [Show full text]
  • Conférence Merrill Lynch Impression
    June 8, 2005 - Merrill Lynch Lynch Merrill – TMT Conference Conference TMT TMT conference – June 8, 2005 2005 8, June - 1 Disclaimer - Merrill Lynch Lynch Merrill All forward-looking statements are TF1 management’s – present expectations of future events and are subject to a Conference TMT number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the – forward-looking statements. 2005 8, June - 2 1 - Ø Introduction Lynch Merrill TF1 Group’s channels – TMT Conference Conference TMT TF1 Channel Advertising Theme channels – June 8, 2005 2005 8, June Other businesses Strategy and outlook - 3 3 months 2005 key figures - IFRS 3 months 3 months P&L account (€M) Change 2005 2004 713.9 713.4 + 0.1% Turnover - Incl. TF1 channel net advertising 430.0 425.1 + 1.2% Lynch Merrill Other activities 283.9 288.3 - 1.5% Programming costs (229.6) (203.3) + 13.0% – TMT Conference Conference TMT Operating profit 100.2 119.1 - 15.9% % turnover 14.0% 16.7% Net profit (attributable to the Group) 60.9 70.9 - 14.1% % turnover 8.5% 9.9% – June 8, 2005 2005 8, June Balance sheet (€M) 31 Mar. 05 31 Dec. 04 Change Shareholders equity 1,025.4 975.5 + 5.1% - Financial net debt 442.7 413.7 + 7.0% Gearing 43% 42% 4 2 IFRS impacts on 2004 consolidated accounts • On Turnover: + €14.2 M Reversal of Dec 03 reclassification of provision for goods returns - Merrill Lynch Lynch Merrill • On net profit: + €4.6 M Incl: Stock-options charges - €3.8 M – TMT Conference Conference TMT Own equity derivative instruments - €1.2 M
    [Show full text]