FUSION REPORT Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FUSION SCIENCE • TECHNOLOGY • ECONOMICS • POLITICS July-August 1984 $2.50/?^™ . The world will have widespread fusion power by the year 2000. The only question is whether it will be delivered by an ICBM or a tokamak. It's up to you! With your help, the Fusion Energy Foundation can • put Fusion magazine into the hands of 200,000 progrowth Americans • educate America on the benefits—economic, military, and scientific—of developing directed energy beam technologies • send speakers nationwide to debate nuclear freeze advocates on campuses and at commun ity meetings • promote science and technology—specifically the development of nuclear fusion and fission and space explor ation—as the most important tools for continuing human progress. Join the Fusion Energy Foundation and give gift subscriptions to Fusion magazine. Yes, I want to support the Fusion Energy Foundation. Enclosed is: • Sustaining membership $250 • Individual membership $75 • Corporate membership $1,000 (AH memberships include 10 issues of Fusion) • 1-year subscription to Fusion $20 (6 issues) • 2-year subscription to Fusion $38 (12 issues) Make checks payable to Fusion Energy Foundation, Box 1438, Radio City Station, New York, N.Y. 10101 EDITORIAL STAFF Editor-in-Chief Carol White Managing Editor Marjorie Mazel Hecht FUSION Fusion Technology Editor Charles B. Stevens SCIENCE • TECHNOLOGY • ECONOMICS • POLITICS Washington Editor Vol 6, No. 2 July-August 1984 Marsha Freeman Energy Editor William Engdahl Features Books Editor David Cherry Art Director 22 The Kra Canal: Gateway to Asia's Development Alan Yue Uwe Parpart Henke Photo Editor Under discussion for some 200 years, the Kra Canal project is now under Carlos de Hoyos active consideration. Advertising Manager Joseph Cohen Circulation and Subscription Manager 26 Using Nuclear Explosives for Construction Denise Ham Dr. Steven Bardwell and Charles B. Stevens (212)247-8820 Partial use of nuclear explosives for excavation would cut both the construction time and the cost of the Kra Canal by 40 percent. FUSION (ISSN 0148-0537) is published 4 times a year by the Fusion Energy Foundation, 304 West 58th Street, Fifth Floor, New York, N.Y. 10019. Tel. 28 France Takes the Nuclear Lead (212) 247-8439. Dedicated to providing accurate and comprehensive information on advanced en Laurent Rosenfeld ergy technologies and policies, FUSION is com mitted to restoring American scientific and tech While the U.S. nuclear program is shrinking away, nuclear power has nological leadership. FUSION coverage of the produced more than one-half of France's electricity since July 1983. frontiers of science focuses on the self-developing qualities of the physical universe in such areas as plasma physics—the basis for fusion power—as well as biology and microphysics, and includes 35 Thermonuclear Laser Fusion in the Soviet Union ground-breaking studies of the historical devel Dr. Nikolai G. Basov opment ot science and technology. The views of the FEF are stated in the editorials. "There is no doubt as to achieving breakeven in thermonuclear Opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily reactions using the laser approach,'' says Academician Basov. those of the FEF directors or advisory board. Subscriptions by mail are $20 for 6 issues or $38 for 12 issues in the US A; $25 for 6 issues in Canada. Airmail subscriptions to other countries 41 Why I Must Attack Albert Einstein are $40 for 6 issues. Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Address all correspondence to FUSION, Fusion Energy Foundation, P.O. Box 1438, Radio City How does one determine valid scientific conceptions? The method Station, New York, N.Y. 10101. Second class postage paid at New York, N.Y. presented here, the hypothesis of the higher hypothesis, is based on Postmaster: Send address changes to FUSION, restoring the fundamental principles of continental science. P.O. Box 1438. Radio City Station. New York, N.Y. 10101. Note to Libraries and Subscribers News We apologize for irregularity in our printing schedule, but we assure readers that the only pron- SPECIAL REPORT uclear science magazine in the country intends to continue publishing! Because of financial difficul 9 Made in Moscow? The Legislation Against U.S. Beam Defense ties, the FEF published only 4 issues of FUSION in 1983. The FEF will now regularly publish 6 issues 11 The Pritikin Fraud: Promoting the Cult of Protein Deprivation a year, but only 4 issues in 1984, beginning with FUSION REPORT Vol. 6. No. 1, May-June 1984. Subscribers who purchased a 10-issue sub 14 JET Begins Phase 2 of Operation scription and those who purchased a 6-issue sub 16 Sandia Achieves Breakthrough in Particle Beam Focusing scription will receive the number of issues they paid for. 17 Livermore Study Shows Fusion Will Be Cheapest Energy Source Contributions to the FEF are welcome (and tax BEAM DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY deductible). 19 Lasers Can Propagate Through the Atmosphere Copyright B 1984 WASHINGTON Fusion Energy Foundation 50 Congress Slashes the Fusion Budget Printed in the USA All Rights Reserved 51 The U.S. Needs a Manned Space Station! THE YOUNG SCIENTIST ISSN 0148-0537 USPS 437-370 54 How Plants Grow in the 'Golden Mean' Ratio 59 Professor Von Puzzle: Brother Bonacci's Rabbits On the cover: Christopher Sloan's il lustration of the Kra Canal, depicting the the canal entrance at the port of Songkhla. A nuclear power plant is in Departments the left foreground, the port is at right, and the industrial zone is in the back EDITORIAL 7 VIEWPOINT ground. Cover design is by Virginia NEWS BRIEFS 61 BOOKS Baier. Editorial Strategic Defense Initiative on the If the Democratic Party machine around Charles Manatt The White House request of $1.78 billion for the Strategic and Averell Harriman along with the so-called conserva Defense Initiative was already a compromise, a reelection- tives around the Heritage Foundation and Lt. General Dan year concession to the Danny Graham lobby and the Soviet ny Graham have their way, we will be left with the choice agents of influence in Congress and the Senate. This is of submitting to Soviet nuclear blackmail or fighting a war about one-tenth the amount needed for the crash effort we cannot win. that we have proposed to develop a layered beam defense On the one side, the Graham crowd in High Frontier is system. trying to turn the President's beam weapon defense pro At stake here is nothing less than the fate of the Western gram into a Rube Goldberg makeshift, putting into orbit Alliance, and with it civilization as we know it. There is no shrapnel-filled spacecraft that are both ineffective and in longer any doubt that the strategic advantage now lies in defensible. On the other side, various liberal congressmen development of defensive rather than offensive weapons; have submitted legislation to Congress attacking the U.S. defensive beam weapons are here to stay. That the Soviets beam defense system—legislation that has the stamp of have a crash program to develop beam weapons is well approval from the Soviet Embassy in Washington, D.C. (as documented, going back to the 1960s. The question is: How the Special Report documents, p. 9). As a result, the Stra far advanced are they? Are we about to have another Sput tegic Defense Initiative could have as much as $400 million nik surprise this year or next? cut from its funding. Under the prodding of Senators Pressler and Tsongas, 2 FUSION July-August 1984 Editorial fectiveness is that the Soviets could rebuild their entire missile force so that the boost phase of a missile would be complete before the missile leaves the atmosphere—but this rebuilding would take 20 years. Thus Soviet missiles will remain vulnerable to U.S. X-ray laser defense for quite a while, giving us time to come up with new defenses. Who Is the Soviet Lobby? One of the most startling aspects of the fight for beam defense is to see how successful the Soviets have been in influencing both ends of the U.S. political spectrum to pro mote Soviet policy. The crowd around Richard Garwin and Kosta Tsipis, for example, openly travels on the left (so openly, in fact, that former Washington governor Dixy Lee Ray called Garwin a "traitor" at an international meeting on beam defense a year ago). Their line of attack against beam weapons, however, dovetails with that of the so-called right- wing crowd around General Graham. The Graham group claims to support the development of ABM systems and the concept of mutually assured survival. Yet, by opposing the development of directed energy beam weapons—beam defense based on new physical principles—at this time they are working to undermine the only effective system for a layered beam defense. The line of the so-called right wing is that laser and asso ciated defensive weapons are diverting funds from less so phisticated kill systems—and besides, they say, beam weapons may not work. Of course, Graham et al. fail to admit that their program is a guaranteed 50 percent failure, according to SDI manager Lt. General Abrahamson, even though it involves a proven technology. Now a nasty coalition of these traitors has been formed: &S?tO f the National Campaign to Save the ABM treaty. In addition to former President Jimmy Carter and dean of the Demo cratic Party Averell Harriman, its leading spokesmen in clude former military advisor Richard Garwin, former na tional security advisor McGeorge Bundy, former secretary Line of state Cyrus Vance, and General Maxwell Taylor. These are the same men who 20 years ago were known as the "butchers of Vietnam." They created that bloody war as a key liberal spokesmen in the drive to sabotage this coun no-win situation whose only purpose was to target as large try's beam weapon effort, the Congressional Office of a population as possible for destruction.