DOCSLIB.ORG

Winter 1995-1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

21 st CENTURY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Vol. 8, No.4 Winter 1995-1996 Features 22 Johannes Kepler's Mysterium Cosmographicum A Guide to the Harmony of the Mind and the Universe Ralf Schauerhammer Four hundred years later, Kepler's first work still tells us more about the solar system and human creativity than Newton or any other empiricist is capable of doing. 35 First English Translation: RIEMANN'S PHILOSOPHICAL FRAGMENTS FOREWORD 36 Riemann Refutes Euler Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. TRANSLATION 50 Philosophical Fragments Bernhard Riemann 50 Introduction to Second German Edition 50 Translator's Note 51 I. On Psychology and Metaphysics 55 II. Epistemological Issues GESAIlXELTE 57 III. Natural Philosophy MA'l'HEMATISCHE WERKE SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL WI8SY.NSCHAFTLICHER NAmILASs, 44 On the Hypotheses Which Lie at The Foundations of Geometry [excerpts] Bernhard Riemann 47 Riemann in English Translation 48 Euler's Lying Attack on Leibniz NACHTRAGE 52 Herbart on the Thought Process M. NOETllER UND .... WIRTINGER oon:R PUBUCA.TlO�S.INC. News Bernhard Riemann (7826- 7 866), with SPECIAL REPORT: THE DARWIN DEBATE title page from the second German 10 In Defense of Darwin edition ofhis works. 11 Bury Darwin-It's Overdue! FUSION REPORT 63 Tokamak Plasma Advances Made But Budget Cuts Threaten Program GEOMETRY 66 In the Footsteps of Kepler: On the cover: Two polyhedra built by Fa­ A Master Polyhedra Builder Demonstrates His Art ther Magnus Wenninger: The larger model is a perfect polyhedron with the vertices of the Archimedean icosadodecahedron, which has 30 rectangular faces and 20 per­ Departments fect hexagons. With it is a small stellated EDITORIAL VIEWPOINT dodecahedron. Philip Ulanowsky photo­ 2 5 8 NEWS BRIEFS graphed the models; cover design is by 4 LETTERS The Infamous 69 BOOKS Rosemary Moak. Delaney Clause EDITORIAL EDITORIAL STAFF Editor-In-Chief Carol White Managing Editor Ma�orie Mazel Hecht The Kepler Year Associate Editors David Cherry cience today is under very brutal at­ War II, but that is certainly not the root Marsha Freeman Laurence Hecht tack. The pay-as-you-go idea that all cause of the problem_ Nor even are the Carol Hugunin Sresearch must have an immed iate, prac­ openly Malthusian goals of the environ­ Rogelio A. Maduro Jim Olson tical goal means the death of fundamen­ mentalists at the root. Charles B. Slevens tal science. Then there are the myriad We could not have come to this pass Mark Wilsey environmentalist frauds promoted in the were there not a far graver problem, ex­ name of science_ Indeed, young people empl ified by the steri Ie orthodoxy of Books David Cherry today are taught pagan ideology-a res­ modern mathematical physics. Nature is urrection of the cult of the earth god­ expected to conform to a preconceived, Art Director dess Gaia-as science. If these trends axiomatically closed mathematical the­ Rosemary Moak continue, scientific inquiry will soon be orem structure, accord ing to the pre­ a thing of the past, and we will have cepts of Aristotelian logic. Advertising Manager Marsha Freeman doomed ourselves and our posterity to a At 27 st Century, therefore, while we misery and banality still unimagined deplore the present crisis in science, we SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD today. see it as an opportunity to get rid of the Francesco Celani, PhD Things were certainly better in the dead weight of the past, in order to al­ Hugh W. Ellsaesser, PhD BerthaFarfa n, MD United States of John F. Kennedy, but it low the birth of a new scientific renais­ James Frazer, PhD would be wrong to look for simple an­ sance, based upon the principles of cre­ Emmanuel Grenier swers to the question of how we got ative discovery. We commit ourselves Wilford Hansen, PhD Hideo Ikegami, PhD from there to here. One reason for the to this, in the spirit of Johannes Kepler, Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. institutional destruction of American who 400 years ago, in 1 S96, published Wolfgang Ullge,MD Ramtanu Maitra science today lies in the increasing bu­ his first major work, The Secret of the Giuliano Preparata, PhD reaucratization of science since World Universe_ B.A. Soldano, PhD B.P. Sonnenblick, PhD Jonathan Tennenbaum, PhD Daniel R. Wells, PhD 21st Century Science & Technology (ISSN 0895-6820) is published 4 times a year in 1995, every third month, by 21st Century Science Asso­ Those Impossible Waves ciates, 60 Sycolin Road, Suite 203, Leesburg, Va. 22075. Tel. (703) 777-7473. Address all correspondence to 21sl Cenlury, P.O. Box 16285, Washington, D.C. 20041. In the Solar Wind Second-class postage is paid at Leesburg, Va. and additional mailing offices. n July, three AT&T Bell Labs scientists th is should destroy the waves, the text­ Dedicated to providing accurate and compre­ reported their discovery that the solar books say. Finally, the solar wind even­ hensive information on advanced technologies I and science policy, 21st Cenluryis committed to wind-the flow of plasma from the tually becomes so rarefied and colli­ restoring American scientific and technological Sun-carries waves that originate in the sions so rare, that no wave could leadership. 2151 Cenlury covers the frontiers of science, focusing on the self-developing qualities vast number of vibrations or oscillations continue to propagate. of the physical universe in such areas as plasma physics-the basis for fusion power-'-as well as of the Sun itself. What is apparently But they do! biology and microphysics, and including ground­ happening is that the densities of the This is good news for solar-terrestrial breaking studies of the historical development of science and technology. Opinions expressed in various particles thrown off by the Sun science precisely because it upsets articles are not necessarily those of 21st Century have stable variations with time. That these fundamental ideas imposed on Science Associates or the scientific advisory board. is, they have a wave structure, and it the field by the Newton-Euler mindset. Subscriptions by mail are $25 for 6 issues or continues out into the solar wind. Indeed, the news continues, as of this $48 for 12 issues in the USA and Canada. Airmail subscriptions to other countries are $50 for 6 is­ This is not supposed to be possible, writing, to create excitement among sues. Back issues are $5 each ($6 foreign). Pay­ ments must be in U.S. currency. as can be seen in the comments of specialists, who express "surprise, won­ POSTMASTER: Send address changes to 21st other scientists reported below_ Accord­ der and skepticism"-in the words of Century, P.O. Box 16285, Washington, D.C. 20041-0285. ing to the textbooks, the upper atmos­ one commentator-even though they phere of the Sun is so in homogenous have yet to scrutinize those hegemonic, Copyright © 1995 that the neat patterns of the solar oscil-. fu ndamental assumptions that are im­ 21s1 Cenlury Science Associates lations would be disrupted and not car­ plicitly being challenged_ Printed in the USA ISSN 0895-6820 ried out into the solar wind_ Moreover, Presumably, the key is in the behav­ the solar wind itself is turbulent, and ior of the interplanetary magnetic field, 2 Winter 1995-1 996 21 st CENTURY EDITORIAL but certainly not in particle-particle in­ were all systematica lly higher by a factor in Physics Today in September, the re­ teractions. of 1.00078. Thomson et al. th ink the sults of Thomson et al. "are particularly So me Details factor of 1.00078 might be a conse­ interesting because they imply that the Since th is editorial is also the first re­ quence of a Doppler effect. Or, it might Sun's core and the solar wind are cou­ port of the discovery in 21st Century, be a variation in the solar cycle, since pled, although half a billion kilometers some details are in order here. In "Prop­ the two data sets were taken at different of largely turbulent plasma and 24 to 26 agation of Solar Oscillations Through points in the cycle. orders of magnitude in density separated the Interplanetary Medium" (Nature, July Charged particles from the Sun enter the solar core from where the satell ite 13), David Thomson, Carol Maclennan, Earth's magnetosphere, where they are measured the solar wind ion flux." and Louis Lanzerotti report on their best known fo r damaging spacecraft So we have a picture of these waves analysis of 1992-1 994 data from the electronics and inducing voltage surges "lasing" through the inhomogeneities of Ulysses spacecraft, with earlier Voyager in telephone and power lines. Now that the upper solar atmosphere and the tur­ 2 data as a cross-check. They find that the particles have been found to be or­ bulence of the solar wind. Additionally, the spectra of temporal variations of dered in waves, it would be useful to the waves continue to propagate even low-energy hydrogen and helium ion ask what implications th is has for the when the solar wind has become so flows coming from the Sun show very workings of nature on Earth. rarefied that, from the standpoint of sharp, distinct frequencies. percussive propagation, they Most of these waves should re­ should not. sult from g modes in the Sun, ac­ Ladbury goes further. Confi r­ cording to Thomson et al. These g mation of the results of Thomson modes are hypothetical standing and his colleagues, he writes, density waves in the Sun for "would go a long way toward es­ which gravity is said to be the tablishing their results as a truly restoring force, and which are revolutionary contribution to supposed to originate deep within space physics." the solar interior.
Recommended publications
  • The True History of the U.S. Fusion Program —And Who Tried to Kill It

    The True History of the U.S. Fusion Program —And Who Tried to Kill It

    PPPL Inside the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, while it was in con- struction. The TFTR set world records for plasma temperature and fusion power produced in the late 1980s and early 1990s. But budget cuts closed it down before all its planned experiments were completed. The True History of The U.S. Fusion Program An inside analysis of how the U.S. fusion program was —And Who euthanized, dispels the myth that “fusion can’t work.“ Tried To Kill It by Marsha Freeman here is no disputing that the world is facing an energy been visible on the horizon for years, but seemingly never crisis of vast proportions. But this could have been avoid- close at hand. Why? Ted. For more than five decades, scientists, engineers, en- Legend has it that there are more problems in attaining con- ergy planners, policy-makers, and, at times, even the public at trolled nuclear fusion than scientists anticipated, and that little large, have known what the ultimate alternative is to our finite progress has been made. “Fusion is still 50 years away, and energy resources—nuclear fusion. This energy, which powers always has been” has become the common refrain of skeptics. the Sun and all of the stars, and can use a virtually unlimited But the reason that we do not have commercially available supply of isotopes of hydrogen, available from seawater, has fusion energy is not what is commonly believed. 21st Century Science & Technology Winter 2009/2010 15 In 1976, the Energy Research and Development Administra- tion, or ERDA—the predecessor to the Department of Energy—pub- lished a chart showing various policy and funding options for the magnetic fusion energy research program.
  • Regular Polyhedra of Index 2

    Regular Polyhedra of Index 2

    REGULAR POLYHEDRA OF INDEX 2 A dissertation presented by Anthony Cutler to The Department of Mathematics In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Mathematics Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April, 2009 1 REGULAR POLYHEDRA OF INDEX 2 by Anthony Cutler ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Northeastern University, April 2009 2 We classify all finite regular polyhedra of index 2, as defined in Section 2 herein. The definition requires the polyhedra to be combinatorially flag transitive, but does not require them to have planar or convex faces or vertex-figures, and neither does it require the polyhedra to be orientable. We find there are 10 combinatorially regular polyhedra of index 2 with vertices on one orbit, and 22 infinite families of combinatorially regular polyhedra of index 2 with vertices on two orbits, where polyhedra in the same family differ only in the relative diameters of their vertex orbits. For each such polyhedron, or family of polyhedra, we provide the underlying map, as well as a geometric diagram showing a representative face for each face orbit, and a verification of the polyhedron’s combinatorial regularity. A self-contained completeness proof is given. Exactly five of the polyhedra have planar faces, which is consistent with a previously known result. We conclude by describing a non-Petrie duality relation among regular polyhedra of index 2, and suggest how it can be extended to other combinatorially regular polyhedra.
  • The Wonders of Uranus NASA's Voyager Captures a New World 3 Billion Miles Away Expand the World's View! Join the Fusion Energy Foundation

    The Wonders of Uranus NASA's Voyager Captures a New World 3 Billion Miles Away Expand the World's View! Join the Fusion Energy Foundation

    The Wonders Of Uranus NASA's Voyager Captures A New World 3 Billion Miles Away Expand the world's view! Join the Fusion Energy Foundation. Subscribe to Fusion magazine. Enclosed is: • Sustaining membership $250 • Individual membership $75 • Corporate membership $1,000 (All memberships include 6 issues of Fusion.) • 1-year subscription to Fusion $20 (6 issues) • 2-year subscription to Fusion $38 (12 issues) • 1-year subscription to Fusion (airmail foreign) $40 Now you can subscribe to Fusion iu 5 languages • Fusion in Spanish, French, Italian, German*, or Swedish or Fusion Asia in English—$40 (4 issues) * 6 issues per year. EDITORIAL STAFF Editor-in-Chief Carol White FUSION Managing Editor Marjorie Mazel Hecht SCIENCE • TECHNOLOGY • ECONOMICS • POLITICS Fusion Technology Editor May-June 1986 Vol. 8, No. 3 Charles B. Stevens Washington Editor Features Marsha Freeman Energy Editor 36 The Wonders of Uranus William Engdahl Books Editor Voyager 2 Opens Up an Unusual New World David Cherry Marsha Freeman and Jim Everett Art Director After traveling 3 billion miles and 8V2 years, Voyager 2 has provided us Alan Yue with the first close-up views of Uranus. Photo Editor Carlos de Hoyos 43 Defeating Aids: How Lasers Can Help Advertising Manager Wolfgang Lillge,M.D. Joseph Cohen (703) 689-2497 The United States needs a "biological SDI," a crash program to advance Circulation and Subscription Manager laser and spectroscopy research to the point that we can screen for and Dianne Oliver eliminate the AIDS virus and other deadly diseases. (703) 777-6055 49 The Significance of the SDI for Advanced Space Propulsion and Basic Research FUSION (ISSN 0148-0537) is published 6 limes Dr.
  • V I R Gin I A: S Tip U L a T

    V I R Gin I A: S Tip U L a T

    V I R GIN I A: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF LOUDOUN COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA vs. RICHARD FREEMAN Criminal Nos. 5366 FRED HAIGHT 5369 MARTHA QUINDE 5373 DAVID SHAVIN 5375 EXECUTIVE INTELLIGENCE. REVIEW 5380 Defendants. S TIP U L A T ION ~ THIS STIPULATION of faots is being entered into by and on behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia, by JOHN B. RUSSELL, JR., J Special Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney and WILLIAM T. BURCH, Commonwealth's Attorney, and by each of the above-named I defendants, and their attorney, JOHN FLANNERY, by each of the other defendants involved in this litigation and their counsel, sUbject to ac~eptance by the Court; and constitutes a knowing and intelligent waiver of any conflicts' as further discussed herein. 1. On April 21, 1986, a meeting occurred between John Flannery, Sheriff John Isom and Deputy Sheriff Don Moore. 2. If Sheriff Isom were to testify regarding the substance of this meeting, he would testify, inter alia, as follows: a. Sheriff Isom had known Mr. Flannery through their previous involvement in local politics, and the Sheriff was aware of Mr. Flannery's prior'servide' as a federal prosecutor; b.r' . Sheriffi Isom called'"' Mr. Flannery at his Loudoun ..- "J.Il' 21, 1986 meeting to discuss -2­ ,)' ." this meeting. A copy of this chronology is attached hereto and" made a part hereof; h. At this meeting, Messrs Flannery, Isom and Moore discussed potential criminal charges which might be brought against members of the organization; i. At this meeting, Mr. Flannery mentioned that he would like to be appointed a special prosecutor to try the cases; j .
  • Binary Icosahedral Group and 600-Cell

    Binary Icosahedral Group and 600-Cell

    Article Binary Icosahedral Group and 600-Cell Jihyun Choi and Jae-Hyouk Lee * Department of Mathematics, Ewha Womans University 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-3277-3346 Received: 10 July 2018; Accepted: 26 July 2018; Published: 7 August 2018 Abstract: In this article, we have an explicit description of the binary isosahedral group as a 600-cell. We introduce a method to construct binary polyhedral groups as a subset of quaternions H via spin map of SO(3). In addition, we show that the binary icosahedral group in H is the set of vertices of a 600-cell by applying the Coxeter–Dynkin diagram of H4. Keywords: binary polyhedral group; icosahedron; dodecahedron; 600-cell MSC: 52B10, 52B11, 52B15 1. Introduction The classification of finite subgroups in SLn(C) derives attention from various research areas in mathematics. Especially when n = 2, it is related to McKay correspondence and ADE singularity theory [1]. The list of finite subgroups of SL2(C) consists of cyclic groups (Zn), binary dihedral groups corresponded to the symmetry group of regular 2n-gons, and binary polyhedral groups related to regular polyhedra. These are related to the classification of regular polyhedrons known as Platonic solids. There are five platonic solids (tetrahedron, cubic, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron), but, as a regular polyhedron and its dual polyhedron are associated with the same symmetry groups, there are only three binary polyhedral groups(binary tetrahedral group 2T, binary octahedral group 2O, binary icosahedral group 2I) related to regular polyhedrons.
  • Four-Dimensional Regular Polytopes

    Four-Dimensional Regular Polytopes

    faculty of science mathematics and applied and engineering mathematics Four-dimensional regular polytopes Bachelor’s Project Mathematics November 2020 Student: S.H.E. Kamps First supervisor: Prof.dr. J. Top Second assessor: P. Kiliçer, PhD Abstract Since Ancient times, Mathematicians have been interested in the study of convex, regular poly- hedra and their beautiful symmetries. These five polyhedra are also known as the Platonic Solids. In the 19th century, the four-dimensional analogues of the Platonic solids were described mathe- matically, adding one regular polytope to the collection with no analogue regular polyhedron. This thesis describes the six convex, regular polytopes in four-dimensional Euclidean space. The focus lies on deriving information about their cells, faces, edges and vertices. Besides that, the symmetry groups of the polytopes are touched upon. To better understand the notions of regularity and sym- metry in four dimensions, our journey begins in three-dimensional space. In this light, the thesis also works out the details of a proof of prof. dr. J. Top, showing there exist exactly five convex, regular polyhedra in three-dimensional space. Keywords: Regular convex 4-polytopes, Platonic solids, symmetry groups Acknowledgements I would like to thank prof. dr. J. Top for supervising this thesis online and adapting to the cir- cumstances of Covid-19. I also want to thank him for his patience, and all his useful comments in and outside my LATEX-file. Also many thanks to my second supervisor, dr. P. Kılıçer. Furthermore, I would like to thank Jeanne for all her hospitality and kindness to welcome me in her home during the process of writing this thesis.
  • Regular Polyhedra Through Time

    Regular Polyhedra Through Time

    Fields Institute I. Hubard Polytopes, Maps and their Symmetries September 2011 Regular polyhedra through time The greeks were the first to study the symmetries of polyhedra. Euclid, in his Elements showed that there are only five regular solids (that can be seen in Figure 1). In this context, a polyhe- dron is regular if all its polygons are regular and equal, and you can find the same number of them at each vertex. Figure 1: Platonic Solids. It is until 1619 that Kepler finds other two regular polyhedra: the great dodecahedron and the great icosahedron (on Figure 2. To do so, he allows \false" vertices and intersection of the (convex) faces of the polyhedra at points that are not vertices of the polyhedron, just as the I. Hubard Polytopes, Maps and their Symmetries Page 1 Figure 2: Kepler polyhedra. 1619. pentagram allows intersection of edges at points that are not vertices of the polygon. In this way, the vertex-figure of these two polyhedra are pentagrams (see Figure 3). Figure 3: A regular convex pentagon and a pentagram, also regular! In 1809 Poinsot re-discover Kepler's polyhedra, and discovers its duals: the small stellated dodecahedron and the great stellated dodecahedron (that are shown in Figure 4). The faces of such duals are pentagrams, and are organized on a \convex" way around each vertex. Figure 4: The other two Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra. 1809. A couple of years later Cauchy showed that these are the only four regular \star" polyhedra. We note that the convex hull of the great dodecahedron, great icosahedron and small stellated dodecahedron is the icosahedron, while the convex hull of the great stellated dodecahedron is the dodecahedron.
  • Why the U.S. Framed up FEF Leader Paul Gallagher

    Why the U.S. Framed up FEF Leader Paul Gallagher

    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 17, Number 47, December 7, 1990 �TIillScience &: Technology Whythe U.S. framed up FEF leader Paul Gallagher ThefonnerFusion Energy Foundation executive director tells how his foundation s irifluence on what became Q1.e SDI, prompted an illegal forced bankruptcy andjudicialframeup by the govemment. Paul Gallagher tells how he is the victim ofa judicialframeup unjust federal sentences, and associates of his are appealing because of his association with Lyndon H. LaRouche, and a similar railroad by the Virginia courts, I and my fellow because of his role as the executive director of the prestigious defendants-my wife Anita, and LarryHecht-expect victo­ Fusion Energy Foundation (FEF), which the u.s. govern­ ry in this trial, because for the first time, the government ment illegally bankrupted. He is interviewed by Science Edi­ will not be able to prevent oUr telling the true story of the tor Carol White, who was also a member of the FEF Board bankruptcy of the Fusion Energy Foundation and Campaign­ of Directors. er Publications. We are in a new situation, which was created by the fact White: Paul, will you explain the scope of the railroad that the ruling on the bankrupting of FEF, in favor of the against you and the FEF? foundation, is now definitive.The Solicitor General has an­ Gallagher: This is definitely a continuation of the attempt nounced that the government will not appeal the ruling that by the multi-agency, federal, state, and local "Get the bankruptcy was in fact a fraud committed by the govern­ LaRouche" task force, which has succeeded in getting unjust ment, on the court.
  • Are Your Polyhedra the Same As My Polyhedra?

    Are Your Polyhedra the Same As My Polyhedra?

    Are Your Polyhedra the Same as My Polyhedra? Branko Gr¨unbaum 1 Introduction “Polyhedron” means different things to different people. There is very little in common between the meaning of the word in topology and in geometry. But even if we confine attention to geometry of the 3-dimensional Euclidean space – as we shall do from now on – “polyhedron” can mean either a solid (as in “Platonic solids”, convex polyhedron, and other contexts), or a surface (such as the polyhedral models constructed from cardboard using “nets”, which were introduced by Albrecht D¨urer [17] in 1525, or, in a more mod- ern version, by Aleksandrov [1]), or the 1-dimensional complex consisting of points (“vertices”) and line-segments (“edges”) organized in a suitable way into polygons (“faces”) subject to certain restrictions (“skeletal polyhedra”, diagrams of which have been presented first by Luca Pacioli [44] in 1498 and attributed to Leonardo da Vinci). The last alternative is the least usual one – but it is close to what seems to be the most useful approach to the theory of general polyhedra. Indeed, it does not restrict faces to be planar, and it makes possible to retrieve the other characterizations in circumstances in which they reasonably apply: If the faces of a “surface” polyhedron are sim- ple polygons, in most cases the polyhedron is unambiguously determined by the boundary circuits of the faces. And if the polyhedron itself is without selfintersections, then the “solid” can be found from the faces. These reasons, as well as some others, seem to warrant the choice of our approach.
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits

    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits

    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
  • Exclusive Interview with Shuttle Pilot Robert Crippen 50% of the First Columbia Shuttle Crew Subscribes to FUSION

    Exclusive Interview with Shuttle Pilot Robert Crippen 50% of the First Columbia Shuttle Crew Subscribes to FUSION

    Exclusive Interview with Shuttle Pilot Robert Crippen 50% of the first Columbia shuttle crew subscribes to FUSION If you want to reach him or the other half million FUSION readers who are in command positions in the fields of science, technology, and business, advertise in FUSION magazine. Call Tony Chaitkin at (212) 247-8820. He won't be able to get you space aboard the shuttle, but he can get you space in here. FUSION advertising sales. 5th Floor 304 West 58th Street New York, N.Y. 10019 Advertise In FUSION We're making progress! Literally. Because, as the Fusion Energy Foundation goes, so goes the na­ tion. Think about it. Our rapid growth in 1980 meant that the McCormack fusion bill became law and made possible America's renewed commitment to scientific progress. But making progress costs money. The FEF and the United States face greater challenges in 1981. And as we grow and expand our activities, we can ensure that the new administration fulfills its mandate for economic growth. In 1979 alone, more than 22 million dollars was given to zero-growth groups by just six foundations. * Our fight requires this kind of funding—and more. You can help by giving generously to the FEF and supporting some of our special activities. • Become a corporate or lifetime member of the FEF ($1,000). • Sign up your friends and colleagues as members. • Sponsor bulk subscriptions to The Young Scientist in your area's schools. • Purchase the FEF slide show on fusion to educate your friends and community. 1980 was a year of progress for the FEF and the nation.
  • NRC Collection of Abbreviations

    NRC Collection of Abbreviations

    I Nuclear Regulatory Commission c ElLc LI El LIL El, EEELIILE El ClV. El El, El1 ....... I -4 PI AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555-0001 2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. 0. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica- tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docu- ments and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference pro- ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro- chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula- tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service Include NUREG-series reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal articles, and transactions.