DOCSLIB.ORG

Case 3:17-Cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 1 of 34 Pageid#: 16322

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case 3:17-Cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 1 of 34 Pageid#: 16322 Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 1 of 34 Pageid#: 16322 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR, APRIL MUNIZ, MARCUS MARTIN, NATALIE ROMERO, CHELSEA ALVARADO, JOHN DOE, and THOMAS BAKER, Plaintiffs, v. JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL, JAMES ALEX FIELDS, JR., VANGUARD AMERICA, ANDREW ANGLIN, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00072-NKM MOONBASE HOLDINGS, LLC, ROBERT “AZZMADOR” RAY, NATHAN DAMIGO, ELLIOTT KLINE a/k/a/ ELI MOSLEY, IDENTITY EVROPA, MATTHEW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED HEIMBACH, MATTHEW PARROTT a/k/a DAVID MATTHEW PARROTT, TRADITIONALIST WORKER PARTY, MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL TUBBS, LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH, JEFF SCHOEP, NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT, NATIONALIST FRONT, AUGUSTUS SOL INVICTUS, FRATERNAL ORDER OF THE ALT-KNIGHTS, MICHAEL “ENOCH” PEINOVICH, LOYAL WHITE KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, and EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN a/k/a EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE TRUE INVISIBLE EMPIRE, Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ SUBMISSION REGARDING VENUE FOR TRIAL AND TRIAL LOGISTICS Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 2 of 34 Pageid#: 16323 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. Charlottesville Is the Most Suitable Location for Trial (Question 3) ..................... 3 A. Venue Is Proper in Charlottesville, but Not in Roanoke or Lynchburg ................................................................................................... 3 B. Section 1404(a) Does Not Authorize Transfer to Roanoke or Lynchburg ................................................................................................... 5 1. No Venue in Lynchburg or Roanoke .............................................. 5 2. Other Relevant Considerations ....................................................... 6 C. Section 1404(c) Does Not Authorize the Court to Transfer the Trial ....... 16 II. Holding the Trial in Charlottesville Would Be Logistically Feasible and Enable the Parties to Mitigate the Health Risks Presented by COVID-19 (Question 1) .......................................................................................................... 18 III. Holding the Trial in the Charlottesville Courthouse Would Be Efficient, Manageable, and Safe (Question 2) ...................................................................... 20 A. Plaintiffs’ Proposals for Logistics and Security ........................................ 20 B. None of Defendants’ Security Concerns Justify a Transfer ...................... 22 IV. Plaintiffs Will Continue Their Efforts to Streamline the Trial (Question 4) ........ 25 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 25 Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 3 of 34 Pageid#: 16324 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Bd. of Trs., Sheet Metal Workers Nat’l Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 1253 (E.D. Va. 1988) ..................................................................................... 12, 24 Cantwell v. Gorcenski, No. 3:17-cv-89 (W.D. Va. 2017) ........................................................................................ 23, 25 City of Charlottesville v. Penn. Light Foot Militia, No. 3:17-cv-78-GEC ........................................................................................................... 16, 23 Commonwealth v. Hernandez, No. BR-CR-2013-00983 (Super. Ct. Mass., Bristol Cty. 2015) ............................................... 15 Doe v. Bd. of Visitors of Va. Mil. Inst., No. 7:20CV00058, 2020 WL 2563289 (W.D. Va. May 20, 2020) ............................... 4, 5, 6, 17 Elderberry of Weber City, LLC v. Living Centers-Se., Inc., No. 6:12-CV-52, 2013 WL 1164835 (W.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2013) ................................................ 6 Emerson Creek Pottery, Inc. v. Emerson Creek Events, Inc., No. 6:20-CV-54, 2020 WL 7407469 (W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2020) ....................................... passim Florida v. Casey Anthony, No. 48-2008-CF-015606 (Fla. 9th Cir. Ct. 2008) ..................................................................... 16 Florida v. Zimmerman, No. 12-CF-1083-A (Fla. 18th Cir. Ct. 2013) ............................................................................ 16 Gen. Creation LLC v. Leapfrog Enters., Inc., 192 F. Supp. 2d 503 (W.D. Va. 2002) ...................................................................................... 16 Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP v. Energy Dev. Corp., No. 7:17-CV-102, 2017 WL 1498117 (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2017) ...................................... 12, 17 Gilmore v. Jones, 370 F. Supp. 3d 630 (W.D. Va. 2019) ...................................................................................... 23 Givens v. Main St. Bank, No. 5:08-CV-25, 2010 WL 2925942 (N.D. W.Va. July 22, 2010) ........................................... 14 Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 (1942) .................................................................................................................... 13 ii Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 4 of 34 Pageid#: 16325 Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501 (1947) .................................................................................................................. 12 Harris v. Kessler, No. 3:19-CV-00046, 2020 WL 7029158 (W.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2020)........................................ 23 Heinz Kettler GMBH & Co. v. Razor USA, L.L.C., 750 F. Supp. 2d, 667 (E.D. Va. 2010) ......................................................................................... 7 JTH Tax, Inc. v. Callahan, No. 2:12CV691, 2013 WL 3035279 (E.D. Va. June 6, 2013) ............................................ 16, 17 Kessler v. City of Charlottesville, No. 3:17-cv-00056 (W.D. Va.) ................................................................................................. 25 Kessler v. City of Charlottesville, No. 3:18-cv-00015 (W.D. Va.) ................................................................................................. 25 Kessler v. City of Charlottesville, No. 3:18-cv-00017 (W.D. Va.) ................................................................................................. 25 Kessler v. City of Charlottesville, No. 3:19-cv-00044 (W.D. Va.) ................................................................................................. 25 In re Charlotte Observer, 882 F.2d 850 (4th Cir. 1989) ..................................................................................................... 15 In re Gibson, 423 F. App'x 385, 390 (5th Cir. 2011) ...................................................................................... 16 Minnesota v. Chauvin, No. 27-CR-20-12646 (D. Minn. 2021) ..................................................................................... 15 McGraw-Edison Co. v. Van Pelt, 350 F.2d 361 (8th Cir. 1965) ..................................................................................................... 10 Mullins v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, No. CIV.A. 3:05CV888, 2006 WL 1214024, (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2006) .................................. 16 Rockingham Precast, Inc. v. Am. Infrastructure-Maryland, Inc., No. 5:11-CV-24, 2011 WL 5526092 (W.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2011) ................................................ 8 Russell v. Wright, No. 3:11-CV-00075, 2012 WL 868773 (W.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2012) ........................................ 7, 8 Rust v. CommerceFirst Bank, No. CIV. A. 3:07CV00052, 2008 WL 2074071 (W.D. Va. May 14, 2008) ............................. 12 iii Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 978 Filed 06/11/21 Page 5 of 34 Pageid#: 16326 Snyder v. Phelps, No. RDB-06-1389, 2007 WL 3227213 (D. Md. Oct. 19, 2007) ............................................... 15 Tharpe v. Lawidjaja, No. 6:12-CV-00039, 2012 WL 5336208 (W.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2012) ......................................... 13 Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co., 328 U.S. 217 (1946) .................................................................................................................. 14 Tusha v. Edge Mission Critical Sys., LLC, No. 12-CV-726, 2020 WL 6595211 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2020) ........................................ 4, 6, 18 United States v. Bakker, 925 F. 2d 728 (4th Cir. 1991) .................................................................................................... 15 United States v. Daley et al., 78 F. Supp. 3d 539 (W.D. Va. 2019) ........................................................................................ 23 United States v. Fields., 3:18-cr-11-MFU (W.D. Va.) ..................................................................................................... 23 United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 2003) ..................................................................................................... 14 United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186 (4th Cir. 1976) ..................................................................................................... 15 United States v. Manafort, No. 1:18-cr-00083-TSE (E.D. Va. 2019) .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All
    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Warmsley Cornellgrad 0058F 1
    ON THE DETECTION OF HATE SPEECH, HATE SPEAKERS AND POLARIZED GROUPS IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Dana Warmsley December 2017 c 2017 Dana Warmsley ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE DETECTION OF HATE SPEECH, HATE SPEAKERS AND POLARIZED GROUPS IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA Dana Warmsley, Ph.D. Cornell University 2017 The objective of this dissertation is to explore the use of machine learning algorithms in understanding and detecting hate speech, hate speakers and po- larized groups in online social media. Beginning with a unique typology for detecting abusive language, we outline the distinctions and similarities of dif- ferent abusive language subtasks (offensive language, hate speech, cyberbully- ing and trolling) and how we might benefit from the progress made in each area. Specifically, we suggest that each subtask can be categorized based on whether or not the abusive language being studied 1) is directed at a specific individ- ual, or targets a generalized “Other” and 2) the extent to which the language is explicit versus implicit. We then use knowledge gained from this typology to tackle the “problem of offensive language” in hate speech detection. A key challenge for automated hate speech detection on social media is the separation of hate speech from other instances of offensive language. We present a Logistic Regression classifier, trained on human annotated Twitter data, that makes use of a uniquely derived lexicon of hate terms along with features that have proven successful in the detection of offensive language, hate speech and cyberbully- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNDING HATE How White Supremacists Raise Their Money
    How White Supremacists FUNDING HATE Raise Their Money 1 RESPONDING TO HATE FUNDING HATE INTRODUCTION 1 SELF-FUNDING 2 ORGANIZATIONAL FUNDING 3 CRIMINAL ACTIVITY 9 THE NEW KID ON THE BLOCK: CROWDFUNDING 10 BITCOIN AND CRYPTOCURRENCIES 11 THE FUTURE OF WHITE SUPREMACIST FUNDING 14 2 RESPONDING TO HATE How White Supremacists FUNDING HATE Raise Their Money It’s one of the most frequent questions the Anti-Defamation League gets asked: WHERE DO WHITE SUPREMACISTS GET THEIR MONEY? Implicit in this question is the assumption that white supremacists raise a substantial amount of money, an assumption fueled by rumors and speculation about white supremacist groups being funded by sources such as the Russian government, conservative foundations, or secretive wealthy backers. The reality is less sensational but still important. As American political and social movements go, the white supremacist movement is particularly poorly funded. Small in numbers and containing many adherents of little means, the white supremacist movement has a weak base for raising money compared to many other causes. Moreover, ostracized because of its extreme and hateful ideology, not to mention its connections to violence, the white supremacist movement does not have easy access to many common methods of raising and transmitting money. This lack of access to funds and funds transfers limits what white supremacists can do and achieve. However, the means by which the white supremacist movement does raise money are important to understand. Moreover, recent developments, particularly in crowdfunding, may have provided the white supremacist movement with more fundraising opportunities than it has seen in some time. This raises the disturbing possibility that some white supremacists may become better funded in the future than they have been in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Viii. the Catch-88 Paradox: “Optics” and Backlashes
    VIII. THE CATCH-88 PARADOX: “OPTICS” AND BACKLASHES 45 The more publicity white supremacists get, the more they make themselves vulnerable to [ exposure, negative coverage, and backlashes. ] hortly after the 2016 presidential election, an want to promote their views however they wish. White excited Richard Spencer told a National Public supremacists are typically reluctant to acknowledge the SRadio correspondent that “This is the first time reality that, regardless of whether accompanied by Nazi we’ve really entered the mainstream, and we’re not going flags or by American flags, hardcore white supremacist away. I mean, this is just the beginning.” ideology is something most Americans reject. Spencer’s dream of a grandly ascendant alt right, however, The alt right experienced both of these Catch-88 dynamics “Optics” and Backlashes The Catch-88 Paradox: soon met with a rather harsher reality in the months in 2017-2018 as it moved past the presidential election, following the election as Spencer and his fellow alt right with significant negative effects on it and on the white adherents encountered a Catch-22 that has long bedeviled supremacist movement as a whole. earlier white supremacists. The paradox—it can be called Catch-88 after the popular white supremacist numeric The Alt Right-Alt Lite Split symbol standing for “Heil Hitler”—is simple: in order to The harsh glare of publicity that bathed the alt right began accomplish their goals, white supremacists have to be creating cracks in the movement as early as the weeks active and attract publicity. However, because explicit white after the election, when the first signs emerged of what has supremacy is quite unpopular in the United States, the more publicity white supremacists get, the more they make become known as the alt right-alt lite split.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia Charlottesville Division
    08/12/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION DEANDRE HARRIS, § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. § ________________________3:19CV00046 JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER § VANGUARD AMERICA, ANDREW § ANGLIN MOONBASE HOLDINGS, LLC, § ROBERT “AZZMADOR” RAY, § NATHAN DAMIGO, ELLIOT KLINE § AKA ELI MOSLEY, IDENTITY EVROPA, § MATTHEW HEIMBACH, MATTHEW § PARROT AKA DAVID MATTHEW § PARROTT, TRADITIONALIST WORKERS § PARTY , MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL § TUBBS, LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH, § JEFF SCHOEP, NATIONAL SOCIALIST § MOVEMENT, NATIONALIST FRONT, § AUGUSTUS SOL INVICTUS, § FRATERNAL § ORDER OF THE ALT-KNIGHTS, § MICHAEL “ENOCH” PEINOVICH, § LOYAL WHITE KNIGHTS OF THE § KU KLUX KLAN, § AND EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE § KU KLUX KLAN AKA EAST COAST § KNIGHTS OF THE TRUE INVISIBLE § EMPIRE, NATIONAL POLICY INSTITUTE, § THE PROUD BOYS, COUNCIL OF § CONSERVATIVE CITIZENS, AMERICAN § RENAISSANCE, THE RED ELEPHANTS, § AMERICAN FREEDOM KEEPERS, § ALTRIGHT.COM, § DANIEL P. BORDEN, § JURY TRIAL ALEX MICHAEL RAMOS, § JACOB SCOTT GOODWIN, § TYLER WATKINS DAVIS, § JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 § Defendants. § DeAndre Harris v. Jason Kessler, et al Page 1 of 25 Case 3:19-cv-00046-NKM Document 1 Filed 08/12/19 Page 1 of 25 Pageid#: 28 PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Plaintiff, DeAndre Harris, by his undersigned attorney alleges upon knowledge as to himself and his own actions and upon information and belief as to all the other matters, as follows: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendants for violation of Plaintiff’s individual rights to be free from assault and battery, and, consequently, in violation of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:17-Cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 772 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 7 Pageid#: 11406
    Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 772 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 7 Pageid#: 11406 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR, APRIL MUNIZ, MARCUS MARTIN, NATALIE ROMERO, CHELSEA ALVARADO, JOHN DOE, and THOMAS BAKER, Plaintiffs, v. JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL, JAMES ALEX FIELDS, JR., VANGUARD Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00072-NKM AMERICA, ANDREW ANGLIN, MOONBASE HOLDINGS, LLC, ROBERT “AZZMADOR” RAY, NATHAN DAMIGO, ELLIOT KLINE a/k/a/ ELI MOSLEY, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED IDENTITY EVROPA, MATTHEW HEIMBACH, MATTHEW PARROTT a/k/a DAVID MATTHEW PARROTT, TRADITIONALIST WORKER PARTY, MICHAEL HILL, MICHAEL TUBBS, LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH, JEFF SCHOEP, NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT, NATIONALIST FRONT, AUGUSTUS SOL INVICTUS, FRATERNAL ORDER OF THE ALT-KNIGHTS, MICHAEL “ENOCH” PEINOVICH, LOYAL WHITE KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, and EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN a/k/a EAST COAST KNIGHTS OF THE TRUE INVISIBLE EMPIRE, Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT RICHARD B. SPENCER Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 772 Filed 06/18/20 Page 2 of 7 Pageid#: 11407 We are writing the Court to supplement the factual record with information we recently learned regarding the pending motion to withdraw filed by Defendant Richard Spencer’s attorney, John DiNucci (“the Motion”). More specifically, as described further below, on May 19, 2020, several weeks before the June 11 hearing concerning the Motion in this case, a court in Montana held Mr. Spencer in contempt for his persistent refusal to pay tens of thousands of dollars of court-ordered fees he owes to the Guardian ad Litem (the “GAL”) who represented his children in his recent divorce proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • May 26, 2021 the Honorable Jamie Raskin Chair Homeland Security
    May 26, 2021 The Honorable Jamie Raskin Chair Homeland Security Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties U.S, House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Pete Sessions Ranking Member Homeland Security Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties U.S, House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chair Raskin and Ranking Member Sessions: As part of the Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties May 26 hearing “Confronting Violent White Supremacy (Part V): Examining the Rise of Militia Extremism,” we write to provide the expertise of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) Action Fund. We would ask that this statement be included as part of the official hearing record. The SPLC Action Fund is dedicated to fighting for racial justice alongside impacted communities in pursuit of equity and opportunity for all. We work primarily in the Southeast United States where we have offices in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Washington, D.C. The SPLC Action Fund promotes policies and laws that will eliminate the structural racism and inequalities that fuel oppression of people of color, immigrants, young people, women, low-income people, and the LGBTQ+ community. The riot at the capitol on January 6 of this year has illustrated how far extremists will go and how willing they are to undermine democracy and democratic processes with the objective of advancing their own agendas. This includes groups which engage in paramilitarism, many of whom prescribe to ideologies that fall within the confines of the antigovernment movement. For decades, movement members have formed militias and engaged in paramilitary training, using their expertise to target and terrorize federal, state, and local government officials, agencies, and facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Complaint
    81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857 )257+(:(67(51',675,&72)9,5*,1,$ &KDUORWWHVYLOOH'LYLVLRQ (/,=$%(7+6,1(66(7+:,63(/:(< 0$5,66$%/$,57</(50$*,//$35,/ 081,=+$11$+3($5&(0$5&86 0$57,11$7$/,(520(52&+(/6($ $/9$5$'2DQG-2+1'2( 3ODLQWLIIV Y -$621.(66/(55,&+$5'63(1&(5 &+5,6723+(5&$17:(//-$0(6 $/(;),(/'6-59$1*8$5' $0(5,&$$1'5(:$1*/,1 &LYLO$FWLRQ1RFY1.0 0221%$6(+2/',1*6//&52%(57 ³$==0$'25´5$<1$7+$1'$0,*2 (//,27./,1(DND(/,026/(< ,'(17,7<(9523$0$77+(: -85<75,$/'(0$1'(' +(,0%$&+0$77+(:3$55277DND '$9,'0$77+(:3$55277 75$',7,21$/,67:25.(53$57< 0,&+$(/+,//0,&+$(/78%%6 /($*8(2)7+(6287+-())6&+2(3 1$7,21$/62&,$/,67029(0(17 1$7,21$/,67)5217$8*8678662/ ,19,&786)5$7(51$/25'(52)7+( $/7.1,*+760,&+$(/³(12&+´ 3(,129,&+/2<$/:+,7(.1,*+762) 7+(.8./8;./$1DQG($67&2$67 .1,*+762)7+(.8./8;./$1DND ($67&2$67.1,*+762)7+(758( ,19,6,%/((03,5( 'HIHQGDQWV ),567$0(1'('&203/$,17 3ODLQWLIIVE\WKHLUXQGHUVLJQHGDWWRUQH\VDOOHJHXSRQNQRZOHGJHDVWRWKHPVHOYHVDQG WKHLURZQDFWLRQVDQGXSRQLQIRUPDWLRQDQGEHOLHIDVWRDOORWKHUPDWWHUVDVIROORZV Case 3:17-cv-00072-NKM-JCH Document 175 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 112 Pageid#: 813 1$785(2)7+($&7,21 2YHUWKHZHHNHQGRI$XJXVWDQGKXQGUHGVRIQHR1D]LVDQGZKLWH VXSUHPDFLVWVWUDYHOHGIURPQHDUDQGIDUWRGHVFHQGXSRQWKHFROOHJHWRZQRI&KDUORWWHVYLOOH 9LUJLQLDLQRUGHUWRWHUURUL]HLWVUHVLGHQWVFRPPLWDFWVRIYLROHQFHDQGXVHWKHWRZQDVD EDFNGURSWRVKRZFDVHIRUWKHPHGLDDQGWKHQDWLRQDQHRQDWLRQDOLVWDJHQGD 3ODLQWLIIVLQWKLVDFWLRQDUH8QLYHUVLW\RI9LUJLQLDXQGHUJUDGXDWHVODZVWXGHQWV DQGVWDIISHUVRQVRIIDLWKPLQLVWHUVSDUHQWVGRFWRUVDQGEXVLQHVVSHUVRQV²ZKLWHEURZQDQG EODFN&KULVWLDQDQG-HZLVK\RXQJDQGROG:KLOH3ODLQWLIIVFRPHIURPGLIIHUHQWEDFNJURXQGV
    [Show full text]
  • 1 U.S. White Supremacy Groups Key Points: • Some Modern White
    U.S. White Supremacy Groups Key Points: • Some modern white supremacist groups, such as The Base, Hammerskin Nation, and National Socialist Order (formerly Atomwaffen Division), subscribe to a National Socialist (neo-Nazi) ideology. These groups generally make no effort to hide their overt racist belief that the white race is superior to others. • Other modern white supremacist groups, however, propagate their radical stances under the guise of white ethno-nationalism, which seeks to highlight the distinctiveness––rather than the superiority––of the white identity. Such groups, which include the League of the South and Identity Evropa, usually claim that white identity is under threat from minorities or immigrants that seek to replace its culture, and seek to promote white ethno- nationalism as a legitimate ideology that belongs in mainstream political spheres. • Most modern white supremacist groups eschew violent tactics in favor of using demonstrations and propaganda to sway public opinion and portray their ideologies as legitimate. However, their racial elitist ideologies have nonetheless spurred affiliated individuals to become involved in violent altercations. • White supremacist groups often target youth for recruitment through propaganda campaigns on university campuses and social media platforms. White supremacists have long utilized Internet forums and websites to connect, organize, and propagate their extremist messages. Executive Summary Since the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) first formed in 1865, white supremacist groups in the United States have propagated racism, hatred, and violence. Individuals belonging to these groups have been charged with a range of crimes, including civil rights violations, racketeering, solicitation to commit crimes of violence, firearms and explosives violations, and witness tampering.1 Nonetheless, white supremacist groups––and their extremist ideologies––persist in the United States today.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville, Virginia
    FINAL REPORT INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE 2017 PROTEST EVENTS IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA Photo credit: Jill Mumie TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................... ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................. xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 I. May 13-14 ................................................................................................................ 1 II. July 8 ....................................................................................................................... 2 III. August 11-12 ............................................................................................................ 4 IV. Recommendations .................................................................................................... 7 A. Preparing for Civil Disturbance ........................................................................... 7 B. Effective Management of Protest Events .............................................................. 7 C. Changes in Law .................................................................................................. 8 D. Restoring Faith in Government ........................................................................... 8 METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER Granting First
    Harris v. Kessler et al Doc. 94 Case 3:19-cv-00046-NKM-JCH Document 94 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 6 Pageid#: 275 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION DEANDRE HARRIS, CASE NO. 3:19-cv-00046 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JASON KESSLER, et al., Defendants. JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON This case arises out of the “Unite the Right” rallies held in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 11 and 12th, 2017. Plaintiff Deandre Harris filed this suit against dozens of individuals and white supremacist organizations, asserting that they organized a violent assembly of white supremacists in a conspiracy to deprive him, and black and Jewish persons, of their civil rights. Plaintiff, an African-American Charlottesville resident and then-20-year-old instructional aide at a high school, alleges that several of the defendants assaulted him in a parking garage on August 12, 2017. Dkt. 1 ¶ 3. Plaintiff alleges that certain individual defendants—namely, Daniel Borden, Alex Ramos, Jacob Goodwin, Tyler Davis, and several others whose names are unknown to him—had traveled to Charlottesville to attend the Unite the Right rallies, and that they assaulted Plaintiff by brutally beating him with a wooden plank and a tire iron while he lay on the ground. Id. ¶¶ 4–8, 66–77. Plaintiff alleges that they yelled racial slurs at him while they beat him. Id. ¶ 75. According to the complaint, Borden, Ramos, Goodwin and Davis later either pleaded guilty to or were found guilty of criminal charges for their role in assaulting Plaintiff and were sentenced to terms of incarceration ranging from 3 years and 10 months (Borden) to 8 years (Goodwin); at the time of the complaint Davis had not yet been sentenced.
    [Show full text]
  • Skinheads, Saints, and (National) Socialists
    Skinheads, Saints, and (National) Socialists An Overview of the Transnational White Supremacist Extremist Movement Daveed Gartenstein-Ross and Samuel Hodgson June 2021 FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES FOUNDATION Skinheads, Saints, and (National) Socialists An Overview of the Transnational White Supremacist Extremist Movement Daveed Gartenstein-Ross Samuel Hodgson June 2021 FDD PRESS A division of the FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES Washington, DC Skinheads, Saints, and (National) Socialists Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 7 IDEOLOGIES: GLOBAL TRENDS ..................................................................................................... 8 Neo-Nazi and National Socialist Beliefs ............................................................................................................10 White Genocide and the Great Replacement ...................................................................................................10 Accelerationism ....................................................................................................................................................11 White Power Skinheads .......................................................................................................................................13 White Nationalism and White Separatism .......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]