DOCSLIB.ORG

ARC 118 Persia Syllabus 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARC 118 Persia Syllabus 2019 ARC 118 Dr. Patrick Hunt Winter Quarter 2019 [email protected] Stanford University CSP https://www.nationalgeographic.com/expeditions/experts/patrick-hunt/ Art and Archaeology of Persia Wednesdays, 7:00-9:05 pm, January 15 - March 4, Syllabus & Course Outline Course Aims: Persia has had one of the longest, most glorious, and fascinating histories in the world, well over 5,000 years. Too often neglected by the West, Persia’s rich and complex culture was jealously admired by the ancient Greeks and later by the Byzantines. Its imposing monumental sites range from Achaemenid Persepolis to Safavid Isfahan as well as the garden city of Shiraz. In this course, we will examine millennia of rich textiles, precious gemstone seals and metalworking, and engineering marvels like desert qanat aqueducts. Each week we will encounter treasures well known to archaeologists and art historians but unfamiliar to most well educated Westerners. Course highlights will include the fabulous Oxus Treasure hoard, discovered in the 19th century with its gold griffins, silver simurghs, and other fabulous animals, as well as some of the oldest metallurgical treasures in the world from Proto-Elamites dating to 3100 BCE, before the Bronze Age. We will explore Sassanian silk and the story of deciphering cuneiform with the Behistun Rock. We will read Herodotus on Cyrus the Great and literary masterpieces such as the medieval epic Shahnameh (Book of Kings) in which Rustam is a beguiling Persian hero. Such poignant tales, illustrated by incredible Safavid miniature paintings, predate the legendary stories of the beautiful Persian heroine Scheherazade. Course Requirements: Students attend the nine lecture sessions - including one museum visit - and complete assigned readings from assigned or recommended texts, and supplemental texts as provided. If taken for credit (as MLA or prospective students must fulfill), a brief 10 page critical paper will be completed with topic having prior instructor consent. Course Readings: Relevant linked online readings are assigned per session for a total of 200+ pages as occasional supplemental handouts are also provided. ARC 118 ART & ARCHAEOLOGY OF PERSIA Course Outline 1/15 Neolithic Iran: Animal Domestication, Early Agriculture, Pottery Reading: Tia Ghose, “Evidence of Ancient Farming in Iran Discovered” Live Science 7/5/13 (http:// www.livescience.com/37963-agriculture-arose-eastern-fertile-crescent.html) 1/22 Proto-Elamites and the following Bronze Age of Iran - Luristan Reading: Mark Ronan, “The Puzzle of Proto-Elamite”, History Today 63.1 (http:// www.historytoday.com/mark-ronan/puzzle-proto-elamite); “Bronzes of Luristan” Encyclopaedia Iranica (http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bronzes-of-luristan) 1/29 Cyrus the Great and Rise of the Achaemenid Persian Empire Reading: Herodotus, History, Book 1, begin at 1.108.1-1.129.1 Click forward through to 1.129.1 by hitting on forward arrow (please be patient, as it takes time to load): (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/ hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0126%3Abook% 3D1%3Achapter%3D108%3Asection%3D1) 2/5 Darius and Persian Expansion, Road System and Satrapies Reading: Patrick Hunt, “Achaemenid Persian Griffin capital at Persepolis” Stanford Archaeolog (2008) (https://www.stanford.edu/dept/archaeology/cgi-bin/archaeolog/?p=225) 2/12 Alexander and Persia, Oxus Treasure, Behistun Stone Reading: Tom Holland, “Darius III: Alexander’s Stooge,” The Spectator 2/15 (http:// www.spectator.co.uk/2015/02/darius-iii-alexanders-stooge/) *2/15 Saturday 1-3 pm: Museum Visit, Ancient Persia Gallery, Asian Art Museum, San Francisco 2/19 Parthian Culture and the city of Ctesiphon, Sasanian Persia: Seals and Silks Reading: Edith Porada, “The Art of Parthians”, Iran Chamber (http://www.iranchamber.com/art/ articles/art_of_parthians.php); Reading: Blair Fowlkes-Childs, “The Sasanian Empire 224-651 AD”, Metropolitan Museum of Art, NY (http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/sass/hd_sass.htm) 2/26 Safavid Persia: Isfahan Monuments and Shahnameh Miniatures Reading: Rudi Matthee, “Safavid Dynasty 1501-1722” Encyclopaedia Iranica (2008) (http:// www.iranicaonline.org/articles/safavids) 3/4 Persian Carpets and Textiles Through History Reading: Lydia Pine, “An Object History of the Persian Carpet” JSTOR Daily 6/16/16 (http:// daily.jstor.org/object-history-persian-carpet/); Patrick Hunt, “Persian Paradise Gardens”, Electrum Magazine (http://www.electrummagazine.com/2011/07/paradise-gardens-of-persia-eden-and- beyond-as-chahar-bagh/) Note: Instructor reserves right to amend schedule as needed. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Last Empire of Iran by Michael R.J
    The Last Empire of Iran By Michael R.J. Bonner In 330 BCE, Alexander the Great destroyed the Persian imperial capital at Persepolis. This was the end of the world’s first great international empire. The ancient imperial traditions of the Near East had culminated in the rule of the Persian king Cyrus the Great. He and his successors united nearly all the civilised people of western Eurasia into a single state stretching, at its height, from Egypt to India. This state perished in the flames of Persepolis, but the dream of world empire never died. The Macedonian conquerors were gradually overthrown and replaced by a loose assemblage of Iranian kingdoms. The so-called Parthian Empire was a decentralised and disorderly state, but it bound together much of the sedentary Near East for about 500 years. When this empire fell in its turn, Iran got a new leader and new empire with a vengeance. The third and last pre-Islamic Iranian empire was ruled by the Sasanian dynasty from the 220s to 651 CE. Map of the Sasanian Empire. Silver coin of Ardashir I, struck at the Hamadan mint. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Silver_coin_of_Ardashir_I,_struck_at_the_Hamadan _mint.jpg) The Last Empire of Iran. This period was arguably the heyday of ancient Iran – a time when Iranian military power nearly conquered the eastern Roman Empire, and when Persian culture reached its apogee before the coming of Islam. The founder of the Sasamian dynasty was Ardashir I who claimed descent from a mysterious ancestor called Sasan. Ardashir was the governor of Fars, a province in southern Iran, in the twilight days of the Parthian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan
    The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan George Fiske Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 George Fiske All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan George Fiske This study examines the socioeconomics of state formation in medieval Afghanistan in historical and historiographic terms. It outlines the thousand year history of Ghaznavid historiography by treating primary and secondary sources as a continuum of perspectives, demonstrating the persistent problems of dynastic and political thinking across periods and cultures. It conceptualizes the geography of Ghaznavid origins by framing their rise within specific landscapes and histories of state formation, favoring time over space as much as possible and reintegrating their experience with the general histories of Iran, Central Asia, and India. Once the grand narrative is illustrated, the scope narrows to the dual process of monetization and urbanization in Samanid territory in order to approach Ghaznavid obstacles to state formation. The socioeconomic narrative then shifts to political and military specifics to demythologize the rise of the Ghaznavids in terms of the framing contexts described in the previous chapters. Finally, the study specifies the exact combination of culture and history which the Ghaznavids exemplified to show their particular and universal character and suggest future paths for research. The Socioeconomics of State Formation in Medieval Afghanistan I. General Introduction II. Perspectives on the Ghaznavid Age History of the literature Entrance into western European discourse Reevaluations of the last century Historiographic rethinking Synopsis III.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Archaeology of the Sasanian Period: Former Limitations and New Perspectives
    Newsletter di Archeologia CISA, Volume 7, 2016, pp. 35-88 A MODERN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE SASANIAN PERIOD: FORMER LIMITATIONS AND NEW PERSPECTIVES Bruno Genito, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” Introduction* It is never easy to handle theoretical and methodological issues arising from a particular scientific topic in a kind of review of studies, which is, in its way, what is being presented here. Studies of the archaeology of the Sasanian period have been the subject of numerous acute and critical comments by distinguished scholars in the past, including Huff (1986, 302-308) and more recently as well (1998-2011). Those issues which have been handled, too, have clearly always somewhat suffered from a complex of inferiority to other periods of the history of ancient Iran which are considered by far, the most formative and important: the Achaemenid and the Islamic eras. And this in spite of the fact that the majority of scholars have looked upon the period in question as a real golden age of Persian culture and art, and that it was quite often mentioned in later Islamic sources (including the Shah-nameh by Firdousi), as in many ways an apogee of the fabulous, formidable and legendary Persian Empires. For many scholars the archaeology of the Sasanian period and also that of the early Islamic period, as Whitcomb rightly has pointed out (2010, 5), has always been considered a part of history, and especially of the history of art. This classification, set in stone, has had a long and respectable tradition so far, but at last it has begun to be seen from a different perspective by a growing number of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Firdawsi's Shahnama in Its Ghaznavid Context A.C.S. Peacock1 Abstract
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Firdawsi’s Shahnama in its Ghaznavid context A.C.S. Peacock1 Abstract Firdawsi’s Shahnama, the completion of which is traditionally to around 400/1010, is generally thought to have been a failure at first. It is said by both traditional accounts and much modern scholarship to have been rejected by its dedicatee Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna, and its contents of ancient Iranian legends, transmitted from earlier sources, are widely considered to have been out of step with the literary tastes of the Ghaznavid period. This article reassesses the reception of the Shahnama in the Ghaznavid period, arguing that evidence suggests neither its style nor contents were outdated, and that its tales of ancient Iranian heores had a great contemporary relevance in the context of the Ghaznavid court’s identification of the dynasty as the heir to ancient Iran. The extent to which Firdawsi can be shown to have relied on pre-Islamic sources is also reevaluated Key words Firdawsi – Shahnama – Ghaznavids – pre-Islamic Iran – Persian poetry The reception history of few books can be as well-known as the Shahnama: the allegedly cool reaction of sultan Mahmud of Ghazna (d. 421/1030) when presented with the work around the year 400/1010, and the biting satire on the ruler Firdawsi is claimed to have penned in response, together form part of the Shahnama legend.2 Firdawsi’s hostile reception by the rival poets of Ghazna, for instance, became a topic of miniature painting in manuscripts of the poem,3 and lines such as the satire were interpolated to underline the point.4 Today, the poem’s initial flop is usually taken for granted, and has been attributed to both its form and its contents, which are assumed to be purely antiquarian,5 bereft of any contemporary relevance.
    [Show full text]
  • Denominations and Titles of Rulers in Iran in Pre-Islam Era
    J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 2(12)12311-12320, 2012 ISSN 2090-4304 Journal of Basic and Applied © 2012, TextRoad Publication Scientific Research www.textroad.com Denominations and Titles of Rulers in Iran in Pre-Islam Era Mehrangiz Kiani Haft Lang PhD Candidate in the Field of Ancient Culture and Languages at the Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT Rulers of ancient Iran applied abundance of denominations and titles to disseminate their beliefs and views. A number of such denominations and titles were selected in compliance with their predecessors and others were picked as the result of other factors in the course of time. Through denominations and titles, rulers principally tried to exhibit their sovereignty, supremacy, and sanctity among people. A glimpse at the history and civilization of past peoples paves the way for the investigation of denominations and titles of rulers in old days and factors leading to their formation. KEYWORDS: title – denomination – ruler – history – sovereignty –people INTRODUCTION Generally, the human history is conferred of ascending trend and promoting nature. Therefore, socializations and communications mainly brought about the development of nations. Past civilizations were an impact on communities and occasionally modifications were exerted into the social values and conceptions and occasionally the earlier patterns were obeyed. The application of denominations and titles in Iran is traced back to a long time ago. Monarchs and heads of tribes were mostly characterized through their denominations and titles. Interestingly, Iranians applied their denominations and titles far more than their real names, and desire for denominations and love of titles has preponderated in the culture of this territory.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Gender Structure and Social Inequality in the Sasanian
    Archaeological Science Journal www.scholarpeople.org/ASJ Vol. 1(1). Pp 1-4, May 2012 Full Manuscript An introduction to gender structure and social inequality in the Sasanian Empire, Iran Maryam Dezhamkhooy* University of Birjand, Unit 1, Fourth floor, C 1 block, Yas-e 2 apartments, Shohaday-e Haj St., Fazilat St, Moddares Blv., Shiraz, Fars, Iran. *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 0098 0917 1080651 Accepted: April 4th, 2012 ABSTRACT The Sasanian dynasty was one of the empires of ancient Iran, dating from 224 to 651 A.D. The research investigates the social inequality between men and women in Sasanian Empire in Iran. The exertion of some kinds of gender discrimination and men superiority has appeared in archaeological records and Sasanian text such as Ardaviraf Nameh. The presentation of women in archaeological evidence such as visual arts is rare in comparison to men. The research follows a comparative method in data analysis. Based on the above evidences, this research examines women’s social status and their role in Sasanian society in comparison to other groups such as men and children. Key words: Gender, social inequality, patriarchy, women, Sasanian Iran. INTRODUCTION The Sasanian dynasty was one of the empires of ancient depended on the status of the person in the patriarchy. It Iran, dating from 224 to 651 A.D. (Frye 2001: 274). The seemed that women and some other gender–age-related Sasanian Empire extended from Afghanistan in the east to groups such as children were of a lower status in Mesopotamia, and some parts of Anatoly and Armenia comparison to men.
    [Show full text]
  • Rashīd Al-Dīn and the Making of History in Mongol Iran
    Rashīd al-Dīn and the making of history in Mongol Iran Stefan T. Kamola A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Joel Walker, Chair Charles Melville (Cambridge) Purnima Dhavan Program Authorized to Offer Degree: History ©Copyright 2013 Stefan Kamola University of Washington Abstract Rashīd al-Dīn and the making of history in Mongol Iran Stefan T. Kamola Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Joel Walker History The Jāmiʿ al-tawārīkh (Collected histories) of Rashīd al-Dīn Ṭabīb (d. 1318) has long been considered the single richest witness to the history of the early Mongol Empire in general and its Middle Eastern branch, the Ilkhanate, in particular. This has created a persistent dependence on the work as a source of historical data, with a corresponding lack of appreciation for the place it holds within Perso-Islamic intellectual history. This understanding of Rashīd al-Dīn and the Jāmiʿ al-tawārīkh, however, does not match certain historiographical and ideological strategies evident in the work itself and in other works by Rashīd al-Dīn and his contemporaries. This dissertation reads beyond the monolithic and uncritical use of the Jāmiʿ al-tawārīkh that dominates modern scholarship on Mongol and Ilkhanid history. Instead, it fits Rashīd al-Dīn and his work into the difficult process of transforming the Mongol Ilkhans from a dynasty of foreign military occupation into one of legitimate sovereigns for the Perso-Islamic world. This is the first study to examine a full range of Persianate cultural responses to the experience of Mongol conquest and rule through the life and work of the most prominent statesman of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN CHRONOLOGY MESOPOTAMIA (South) MESOPOTAMIA (North) [RAN LEVANT ANATOLIA EGYPT
    ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN CHRONOLOGY MESOPOTAMIA (South) MESOPOTAMIA (North) [RAN LEVANT ANATOLIA EGYPT 3500 B.c. Late Uruk period Proto-urban period Chalcolithic period Troy I 3500-3100 Susa II Jemdet Nasr period 3100-2900 Archaic period Early Dynastic period Proto-Elamite period 3000 B.C. c. 3000-2575 2900-2334 Susa III Sumero-Elamite period Early Bronze Age Troy II SUA IV Old Kingdom 2575-2134 Akkadian period Akkadian rule 2334-2154 in Susa Alaca Höyük royal Neo-Sumerian period tombs Gudea of Lagash ca. 2100 First Inrermediate Third Dynasty of Ur period 2112-2004 2134-2040 2000 B.c. Isin-Larsa period Middle Bronze Age Middle Kingdom 2017-176} Old Assyrian period Old Elamite period Assyrian Colony 2040-1640 1920-1750 1900-1500 period 1920-1750 Old Babylonian period 1894- 1595 Old Hirtite period Hammurabi 1650-1400 Second Intermediate period (Hyksos) 1792-1750 1640-1532 Kassite period Mitannian period Late Bronze Age Hittite Empire period New Kingdom 1595-1157 1500-1350 1400-1200 1550-1070 Middle Assyrian Middle Elamire period Second Dynasty of Isin Iron Age Neo-Hirtite and Third Intermediate 1000 B.c. period 1350-1000 period 1070-712 1156-1025 Hasanlu V-IV Kingdoms of Aramaean states Neo-Assyrian period Iron Age I-II Israel and Judah Urartian period 883-612 1500-800 850-600 Phoenician city states Late Dynastic period Neo-Eiamite period Phrygian period 712-332 Neo-Babylonian 775-690 period 625-539 Median period Iron Age III \chaemenid dynasty 550-331 Achaemenid rule Achaemenid rule Achaemenid rule 525-404;343-332 Alexander the Great 331-323 Capture of Tyre by Alexander the Great Capture of Babylon Burning of Persepolis Alexander the Grear crosses rhe Hellespont Alexander the Great by the Greeks 331 331 332 334 Macedonian period Seleucid dynasty Seleucid dynasry Seleucid dynasty 332-304 31 2- 129 B.c.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Archaeology of Ancient Iran University of Washington Course
    The Archaeology of Ancient Iran University of Washington Course: NEAR E 207 / ARCHY 269A Instructor: Stephanie Selover Term: Winter 2019 Office Hours: Wednesdays 1-3pm Room: Denny 258 Email: [email protected] Time: T/Th 3:30-5:20pm Office: Denny M220E Course Description: This course in an introduction to the archaeology of ancient Persia, the modern country of Iran, from the time of the earliest inhabitants in the Paleolithic period, to the end of the Sasanian period and the arrival of Islam (ca. 10,000 BCE-651 CE). Though little work was published on the archaeology of Iran in English after the 1979 Revolution, recent archaeological studies and archaeological excavations during the last ten to fifteen years have brought new information to light. This is a cultural, rather than historical class, and we will emphasiZe cultural change over time, rather than political and historical events. Together, we will analyze how archaeology can inform us about our cultural past, and what remains to still be discovered in this important region. The course is split into three sections: (I) The Pre-Urban World, (II) The Establishment of Urbanism and Empire, and (III) Persia in the Global Context, covering roughly the three large cultural time periods in ancient Iran and the greater Near Eastern world. Each section will have at least one spotlight on an important archaeological site. Students are expected to complete all assigned readings and come prepared for a discussion regarding the archaeological site. Specific research and discussion questions will be uploaded onto the course Canvas site a week before these classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenism and Persianism in the East 201 Reviews 16 Chiara Barbati: Review of Benkato, Adam
    Samuel Jordan Center for Persian Studies and Culture www.dabirjournal.org Digital Archive of Brief notes & Iran Review ISSN: 2470-4040 No.7.2020 Special Issue: Hellenism and Iran 1 xšnaoθrahe ahurahe mazdå Detail from above the entrance of Tehran’s fijire temple, 1286š/1917–18. Photo by © Shervin Farridnejad The Digital Archive of Brief Notes & Iran Review (DABIR) ISSN: 2470-4040 www.dabirjournal.org Samuel Jordan Center for Persian Studies and Culture University of California, Irvine 1st Floor Humanities Gateway Irvine, CA 92697-3370 Editor-in-Chief Touraj Daryaee (University of California, Irvine) Editors Parsa Daneshmand (Oxford University) Shervin Farridnejad (Freie Universität Berlin/Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien) Judith A. Lerner (ISAW NYU) Book Review Editor Shervin Farridnejad (Freie Universität Berlin/Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien) Advisory Board Samra Azarnouche (École pratique des hautes études); Dominic P. Brookshaw (Oxford University); Matthew Canepa (University of Minnesota); Ashk Dahlén (Uppsala University); Peyvand Firouzeh (Cambridge Univer- sity); Leonardo Gregoratti (Durham University); Frantz Grenet (Collège de France); Wouter F.M. Henkel- man (École Pratique des Hautes Études); Rasoul Jafarian (Tehran University); Nasir al-Ka‘abi (University of Kufa); Andromache Karanika (UC Irvine); Agnes Korn (CNRS, UMR Mondes Iranien et Indien); Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones (University of Edinburgh); Jason Mokhtarain (University of Indiana); Ali Mousavi (UC Irvine); Mahmoud Omidsalar (CSU Los Angeles);
    [Show full text]
  • CP 15 Sasanian Military Conflict D
    CP 15 Sasanian Military Conflict d. Second Golden Era (498–622) The second golden era began after the second reign of Kavadh I. With the support of the Hephtalites, Kavadh I launched a campaign against the Romans. In 502, he took Theodosiopolis (Erzurum) in Armenia. In 503 he took Amida (Diarbekr) on the Tigris. In 505, an invasion of Armenia by the western Huns from the Caucasus led to an armistice, during which the Romans paid subsidies to the Persians for the maintenance of the fortifications on the Caucasus. In year 525, he suppressed revolts in Lazica and recaptured Georgia. His army with aid of Lakhmid ruler (a Sasanian vassal kingdom), al-Mundhir IV ibn al-Mundhir defeated the Byzatine army under command of famed Belisarius twice, one in year 530 in Battle of Nisbis and other in year 531 in Battle of Callinicum. Although he could not free himself from the yoke of the Ephthalites, Kavadh succeeded in restoring order in the interior and fought with success against the Romans, founded several cities, some of which were named after him, and began to regulate the taxation. After Kavadh I, his son Khosrow I, also known as Anushirvan ("with the immortal soul"; ruled 531–579), ascended to the throne. He is the most celebrated of the Sasanian rulers. Khosrow I is most famous for his reforms in the aging governing body of Sasanians. In his reforms he introduced a rational system of taxation, based upon a survey of landed possessions, which his father had begun and tried in every way to increase the welfare and the revenues of his empire.
    [Show full text]
  • SASANIAN PERSIA Ersia ‘Nothing Has Changed Our Understanding of Greek Culture More Than P the Uncovering in the Past Thirty Years of Its Debt to the East
    EDINBURGH STUDIES IN ANCIENT PERSIA SASANIAN Series Editor: Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones SASANIAN PERSIA ERSIA ‘Nothing has changed our understanding of Greek culture more than P the uncovering in the past thirty years of its debt to the East. In this wide-ranging, amply illustrated and thought-provoking book, Morgan offers a longue durée view of Greek engagement with Persia through elite use of cultural imports.’ Margaret C. Miller, University of Sydney ‘The Greek response to Achaemenid Iran is sometimes seen as a special case within the wider story of interaction between the Greek and non- Greek worlds. Janett Morgan insists that this is not so, and her claim is one to which students of Greek cultural history will have to pay serious attention.’ Christopher Tuplin, University of Liverpool E In the aftermath of the Greco-Persian Wars, Greek communities DIT produced a variety of images of the Achaemenids and their Empire in E D texts and on vases and architecture. These perspectives have traditionally BY Between Rome and the been explained as responses to victory in wars. E Steppes of Eurasia However, Janett Morgan shows that these responses fit into wider B patterns of Greek engagements with the east and reflect dialogues E RHARD of elite identity rather than hubristic celebration. Through a study of ancient texts and material evidence from the archaic and classical periods, she investigates the historical, political and social factors that inspired and manipulated different identities for Persia, and the Persians S W. within different Greek communities. Janett Morgan is Honorary Research Associate at Royal Holloway, AU University of London.
    [Show full text]