DOCSLIB.ORG

Biology 4620 Ornithology Mid-Term Outline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biology 4620 Ornithology Mid-Term Outline Biology 4620 Ornithology mid-term outline Characteristics of modern birds – eleven: feathers, no teeth, bone fusion, pneumatic bones, bipedal, digitigrades, small size, forelimbs for flight, centralized mass, high metabolic rate, extreme nervous system and vision Naming – Aves – Common and Latin name format e.g., Hairy Woodpecker Picoides villosus Faunal regions - Nearctic, Neotropical, Palaearctic, Ethiopian, Oriental, Australasian, Oceanic – endemic taxa of different regions Toucan, Ostrich, Emu, Fairy Bluebird, Kagu et c. Origin and early evolution of birds Shared characteristics of birds and reptiles – six: single occipital condyle, single ear bone, multiple bones in lower jaw, scales on legs, ankle in tarsus, females are heterogametic sex When? Jurassic Example taxon: Archaeopteryx litographica/ Solhofen Quarry/ Hermann von Meyer Bird and reptile characteristics of Archaeopteryx – bird: feathers; reptile: teeth, tiny sternum, clawed forlimb digits, unfused tail bones, no uncinate process on ribs 1990-2016 Liaoning China (proto-)bird (Avialae) discoveries Jurassic Cretaceous Caudipteryx, Anchiornis, Microraptor, Sinornithosaurus, Sinornis santensis, indicating birds descended directly from Coelurosaurian Theropod dinosaurs Speciation and adaptive radiation of birds Speciation: genetic divergence of isolated populations - colonization of oceanic islands - isolation within continental landmasses Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, 1758 birds named by general similarity lumping and splitting trends Biological species concept (BSC) (def’n) Ernst Mayr issues with BSC extinction, Blue/Snow Goose, Mallard/Black Duck, Osprey, crows et c. Phylogenetic Species Concept (def’n) Darwin taxonomic characters, cladistic analysis, parsimony, derived&primative characters ‘fox’ sparrows, murrelets convergent evolution grebe/loon, longclaw/meadowlark, diving petrel Dovekie, Turkey Vulture/Black Vulture molecular genetic techniques – allozymes, mtDNA, DNA-DNA hybridization and melting point analysis (radical reanalysis of avian phylogeny Sibley and Ahlquist), genome sequencing Feathers and flight Feather composition keratin composite Feather functions: lifting surface, smooth coat, insulation, camouflage, communication, sensory Feather structure: calamus/rachis, barb, barbicel, barbule, pennaceous, plumulaceous, velcro homology Feather types: flight, contour, down, filoplume, semiplume, bristle (functions) and ornamental feathers Growth and maintenance – molt, molts basic and alternate, follicle, inferior umbilicus, preening, uropygial gland Crested Auklet, Pitahui Ectoparasites Analgesidae, Sarcoptidae, Mallophagidae Feather colouration melanin carotenoid porphyrin, psittacofulvin, gull flamingo turaco parrot Structural colour iridescence hummingbird Flight and aerodynamics – airfoil, Bernoulli’s Principle, gliding versus flapping flight wing shape, loading, aspect ratio (high versus low), dihedral curvature albatross eagle hawk Northern Harrier grouse, Dovekie specialized wings penguin auk shearwater swift hummingbird variation in raptor wing shape tail shape and function normal, graduated, forked and streamer (aerodynamic lift&drag and wear consequences); crow, raven, pheasant, Barn Swallow, Arctic Tern, tropicbird/jaeger ornamental pin tail: Northern Pintail, Long-tailed Duck, Long-tailed and Parasitic Jaegers, tropicbirds Avian physiology High metabolic rate and body temperature 38-44ºC (control by insulation and blood flow adjustment, panting and gular flutter Double-crested Cormorant), energetic, endurance and nervous consequences Respiratory system – 6-12 air sacs, lung anatomy, alkaline blood (low in CO2) Circulatory system – 4-chambered heart, 2x larger, low heart rate, high volume and efficiency, 300- 400mmHg blood pressure, adaptations for diving e.g., bradycardia Thick-billed Murre 4 minute dives Metabolic rate – basal (BMR) versus flying/active, high BMR, inverse relationship with body size, relationship with flight styles (gliding albatross versus Sooty Tern versus Least Auklet flapping, torpor Poorwill, hummingbird Excretion and water balance – uric acid, desert bird metabolic water source, salt gland Northern Fulmar Digestion – gizzard, gizzard stones, pellet formation and regurgitation, bone dissolving acidic stomach raptors, stomach oil energy concentration Northern Fulmar Avian Brain Large, based on evolutionary expansion of corpus striatum, partitioned fore- mid- hind-, functional laterization, functional compartimentalization Spatial memory – hippocampus – interspecific variation in size - Black-capped Chickadee, Pinyon Jay food caching David Sherry Control of bird song – 4 brain nuclei – size/volume increases with song repertoire size Marsh Wren Avian senses vision - eye anatomy, pectin, rod, cone, fovea, ultraviolet sensitivity, Bluethroat hearing - not so great (why?), exceptions: echolocating Oilbirds and Swiftlets, owls, owl skull and facial and ear location asymmetry for prey location at night and under snow Barred Owl taste & smell – not so great (why?) – exceptions: Procellariiformes ‘tube-noses’ prey location Crested Auklet social communication, Kiwis prey location Mallard courtship, Honeyguides beehives, vultures (Old and New World) carrion touch - filoplume magnetic sense – experimental evidence for compass navigation, magnetite (brain) rhodopsin (eyes) Bird sounds and their meaning Physical properties of sound, frequency, harmonics, consequences for ‘acoustical environment’, adaptations to this, measurement of sound via spectrogram, occillogram Sound production – syrinx, tympaniform membrane, intraclavicular air sac Calls (def’n) versus Song (def’n), call types and functions (alarm, contact, warning, courtship, aggressive) Functions of vocalization: species and individual recognition, evolution when needed Bank Swallow, Rough-winged Swallow, Ancient Murrelet, Common Murre, Atlantic Puffin Song - lengthy, complex, repeated vocal displays often performed by territorial males during the breeding season for purpose of mate attraction and territorial defense superb: Hermit Thrush, Northern Mockingbird, not so complex Henslow’s Sparrow Song learning, ‘imitative vocal learning’, when it occurs, Passeriformes ‘song birds’ critical learning period, silent period, subsong period (babbling), song crystallization Song repetoire – explanations for evolution: anti-habituation, different song different function (Black- throated Green Warbler), Beau Geste (Great Tit), badge of status, location confusion, sexual selection, functionless epiphenomenon Song dialects White-crowned Sparrow social status signal and ecological adaptedness hypotheses Mating systems Defined by duration of pair attachment, number of partners Monogamy dominates (why?) – bird’s constraints developmental and anatomical, female control, it takes two, male confidence of paternity Monogamy Thick-billed Murre, Common Crow, Barn Swallow Polgamy versus Polygyny, Polyandry, Polygynandry definitions Polygyny two patterns – male territorial defence and leks Red-winged Blackbird, Ruff (with satellite males), Andean Cock-of-the-Rock Polyandry two patterns – Classic and Cooperative; why? Females can produce more eggs/clutches than they can care for Classic Sanderling, Red Phalarope; Cooperative Harris’s Hawk, gallinules Polygynandry Smith’s Longspur .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Second Edition
    MASS ESTIMATES - DINOSAURS ETC (largely based on models) taxon k model femur length* model volume ml x specific gravity = model mass g specimen (modeled 1st):kilograms:femur(or other long bone length)usually in decameters kg = femur(or other long bone)length(usually in decameters)3 x k k = model volume in ml x specific gravity(usually for whole model) then divided/model femur(or other long bone)length3 (in most models femur in decameters is 0.5253 = 0.145) In sauropods the neck is assigned a distinct specific gravity; in dinosaurs with large feathers their mass is added separately; in dinosaurs with flight ablity the mass of the fight muscles is calculated separately as a range of possiblities SAUROPODS k femur trunk neck tail total neck x 0.6 rest x0.9 & legs & head super titanosaur femur:~55000-60000:~25:00 Argentinosaurus ~4 PVPH-1:~55000:~24.00 Futalognkosaurus ~3.5-4 MUCPv-323:~25000:19.80 (note:downsize correction since 2nd edition) Dreadnoughtus ~3.8 “ ~520 ~75 50 ~645 0.45+.513=.558 MPM-PV 1156:~26000:19.10 Giraffatitan 3.45 .525 480 75 25 580 .045+.455=.500 HMN MB.R.2181:31500(neck 2800):~20.90 “XV2”:~45000:~23.50 Brachiosaurus ~4.15 " ~590 ~75 ~25 ~700 " +.554=~.600 FMNH P25107:~35000:20.30 Europasaurus ~3.2 “ ~465 ~39 ~23 ~527 .023+.440=~.463 composite:~760:~6.20 Camarasaurus 4.0 " 542 51 55 648 .041+.537=.578 CMNH 11393:14200(neck 1000):15.25 AMNH 5761:~23000:18.00 juv 3.5 " 486 40 55 581 .024+.487=.511 CMNH 11338:640:5.67 Chuanjiesaurus ~4.1 “ ~550 ~105 ~38 ~693 .063+.530=.593 Lfch 1001:~10700:13.75 2 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Specimen of Microraptor Provides Unique Evidence of Dinosaurs Preying on Birds
    Additional specimen of Microraptor provides unique evidence of dinosaurs preying on birds Jingmai O’Connor1, Zhonghe Zhou1, and Xing Xu Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China Contributed by Zhonghe Zhou, October 28, 2011 (sent for review September 13, 2011) Preserved indicators of diet are extremely rare in the fossil record; The vertebral column of this specimen is complete except for even more so is unequivocal direct evidence for predator–prey its proximal and distal ends; pleurocoels are absent from the relationships. Here, we report on a unique specimen of the small thoracic vertebrae, as in dromaeosaurids and basal birds. Poor nonavian theropod Microraptor gui from the Early Cretaceous preservation prevents clear observation of sutures; however, Jehol biota, China, which has the remains of an adult enantiorni- there does not appear to be any separation between the neural thine bird preserved in its abdomen, most likely not scavenged, arches and vertebral centra, or any other indicators that the but captured and consumed by the dinosaur. We provide direct specimen is a juvenile. The number of caudal vertebrae cannot evidence for the dietary preferences of Microraptor and a nonavian be estimated, but the elongate distal caudals are tightly bounded dinosaur feeding on a bird. Further, because Jehol enantiorni- by elongated zygapophyses, as in other dromaeosaurids. The rib thines were distinctly arboreal, in contrast to their cursorial orni- cage is nearly completely preserved; both right and left sides are thurine counterparts, this fossil suggests that Microraptor hunted visible ventrally closed by the articulated gastral basket.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Avian Evolution Phylogeny and Evolution of the Aves
    Phylogeny and Avian Evolution Phylogeny and Evolution of the Aves I. Background Scientists have speculated about evolution of birds ever since Darwin. Difficult to find relatives using only modern animals After publi cati on of “O rigi i in of S peci es” (~1860) some used birds as a counter-argument since th ere were no k nown t ransiti onal f orms at the time! • turtles have modified necks and toothless beaks • bats fly and are warm blooded With fossil discovery other potential relationships! • Birds as distinct order of reptiles Many non-reptilian characteristics (e.g. endothermy, feathers) but really reptilian in structure! If birds only known from fossil record then simply be a distinct order of reptiles. II. Reptile Evolutionary History A. “Stem reptiles” - Cotylosauria Must begin in the late Paleozoic ClCotylosauri a – “il”“stem reptiles” Radiation of reptiles from Cotylosauria can be organized on the basis of temporal fenestrae (openings in back of skull for muscle attachment). Subsequent reptilian lineages developed more powerful jaws. B. Anapsid Cotylosauria and Chelonia have anapsid pattern C. Syypnapsid – single fenestra Includes order Therapsida which gave rise to mammalia D. Diapsida – both supppratemporal and infratemporal fenestrae PttPattern foun did in exti titnct arch osaurs, survi iiving archosaurs and also in primitive lepidosaur – ShSpheno don. All remaining living reptiles and the lineage leading to Aves are classified as Diapsida Handout Mammalia Extinct Groups Cynodontia Therapsida Pelycosaurs Lepidosauromorpha Ichthyosauria Protorothyrididae Synapsida Anapsida Archosauromorpha Euryapsida Mesosaurs Amphibia Sauria Diapsida Eureptilia Sauropsida Amniota Tetrapoda III. Relationshippp to Reptiles Most groups present during Mesozoic considere d ancestors to bird s.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous Enantiornithine Bird Rapaxavis Pani
    Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird Rapaxavis pani JINGMAI K. O’CONNOR, LUIS M. CHIAPPE, CHUNLING GAO, and BO ZHAO O’Connor, J.K., Chiappe, L.M., Gao, C., and Zhao, B. 2011. Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird Rapaxavis pani. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (3): 463–475. The exquisitely preserved longipterygid enantiornithine Rapaxavis pani is redescribed here after more extensive prepara− tion. A complete review of its morphology is presented based on information gathered before and after preparation. Among other features, Rapaxavis pani is characterized by having an elongate rostrum (close to 60% of the skull length), rostrally restricted dentition, and schizorhinal external nares. Yet, the most puzzling feature of this bird is the presence of a pair of pectoral bones (here termed paracoracoidal ossifications) that, with the exception of the enantiornithine Concornis lacustris, are unknown within Aves. Particularly notable is the presence of a distal tarsal cap, formed by the fu− sion of distal tarsal elements, a feature that is controversial in non−ornithuromorph birds. The holotype and only known specimen of Rapaxavis pani thus reveals important information for better understanding the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of longipterygids, in particular, as well as basal birds as a whole. Key words: Aves, Enantiornithes, Longipterygidae, Rapaxavis, Jiufotang Formation, Early Cretaceous, China. Jingmai K. O’Connor [[email protected]], Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, 142 Xizhimenwaidajie, Beijing, China, 100044; The Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA; Luis M. Chiappe [[email protected]], The Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Ex− position Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA; Chunling Gao [[email protected]] and Bo Zhao [[email protected]], Dalian Natural History Museum, No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Diversification of Birds
    Current Biology Review The Origin and Diversification of Birds Stephen L. Brusatte1,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor2,*, and Erich D. Jarvis3,4,* 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, King’s Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK 2Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.B.), [email protected] (J.K.O.), [email protected] (E.D.J.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003 Birds are one of the most recognizable and diverse groups of modern vertebrates. Over the past two de- cades, a wealth of new fossil discoveries and phylogenetic and macroevolutionary studies has transformed our understanding of how birds originated and became so successful. Birds evolved from theropod dino- saurs during the Jurassic (around 165–150 million years ago) and their classic small, lightweight, feathered, and winged body plan was pieced together gradually over tens of millions of years of evolution rather than in one burst of innovation. Early birds diversified throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, becoming capable fliers with supercharged growth rates, but were decimated at the end-Cretaceous extinction alongside their close dinosaurian relatives. After the mass extinction, modern birds (members of the avian crown group) explosively diversified, culminating in more than 10,000 species distributed worldwide today. Introduction dinosaurs Dromaeosaurus albertensis or Troodon formosus.This Birds are one of the most conspicuous groups of animals in the clade includes all living birds and extinct taxa, such as Archaeop- modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • Body and Limb Size Dissociation at the Origin of Birds: Uncoupling Allometric Constraints Across a Macroevolutionary Transition
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12150 BODY AND LIMB SIZE DISSOCIATION AT THE ORIGIN OF BIRDS: UNCOUPLING ALLOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS ACROSS A MACROEVOLUTIONARY TRANSITION T. Alexander Dececchi1,2 and Hans C. E. Larsson3 1Biology Department, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark Street, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Redpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6 089457 Received May 30, 2012 Accepted April 17, 2013 The origin of birds and powered flight is a classic major evolutionary transition. Research on their origin often focuses on the evolution of the wing with trends of forelimb elongation traced back through many nonavian maniraptoran dinosaurs. We present evidence that the relative forelimb elongation within avian antecedents is primarily due to allometry and is instead driven by a reduction in body size. Once body size is factored out, there is no trend of increasing forelimb length until the origin of birds. We report that early birds and nonavian theropods have significantly different scaling relationships within the forelimb and hindlimb skeleton. Ancestral forelimb and hindlimb allometric scaling to body size is rapidly decoupled at the origin of birds, when wings significantly elongate, by evolving a positive allometric relationship with body size from an ancestrally negative allometric pattern and legs significantly shorten by keeping a similar, near isometric relationship but with a reduced intercept. These results have implications for the evolution of powered flight and early diversification of birds. They suggest that their limb lengths first had to be dissociated from general body size scaling before expanding to the wide range of fore and hindlimb shapes and sizes present in today’s birds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Remarkable Fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and How They Have Changed Our Knowledge of Mesozoic Life
    The remarkable fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and how they have changed our knowledge of Mesozoic life Presidential Address, delivered 2nd May 2008 Michael J. Benton1, Zhou Zhonghe2, Patrick J. Orr3, Zhang Fucheng2 & Stuart L. Kearns1 BENTON, M. J., ZHOU Z., ORR, P. J., ZHANG, F. & KEARNS, S. L. 2008. The remarkable fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and how they have changed our knowledge. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 119, 209–228. Palaeontologists and others have been repeatedly amazed by reports of spectacularly well-preserved fossils from China, and one of the key sources has been the Jehol Biota of Liaoning, Hebei and Inner Mongolia in NE China. The Jehol Biota consists of three main horizons, the Dabeigou, Yixian and Jiufotang formations, spanning the late Hauterivian to early Aptian (131–120 Ma) of the Early Cretaceous and, collectively, these have produced thousands of essentially complete specimens of plants, insects, aquatic invertebrates, fishes, frogs, salamanders, turtles, lizards, choristoderes, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, birds and mammals. Most of the specimens show some aspect of exceptional preservation, ranging from clear impressions of the body outlines to traces of soft tissues (liver, teleost air sac, eye spots) and external body coverings (scales, feathers, hair). The claim was made that these discoveries have revolutionized our understanding of evolution through this critical part of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution. Key insights have come from the numerous specimens of dinosaurs with feathers, but numerical study shows that only the finds of birds and mammals have substantially changed our views about global diversity and patterns of evolution through the Early Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Cladistics and the Origin of Birds: a Review and Two New Analyses
    Cladistics and the Origin of Birds: A Review and Two New Analyses OM66_FM.indd 1 3/31/09 4:56:43 PM Ornithological Monographs Editor: John Faaborg 224 Tucker Hall Division of Biological Sciences University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri 65211 Managing Editor: Mark C. Penrose Copy Editor: Richard D. Earles Authors of this issue: Frances C. James and John A. Pourtless IV Translation of the abstract by Lisbeth O. Swain The Ornithological Monographs series, published by the American Ornithologists’ Union, has been established for major papers and presentations too long for inclusion in the Union’s journal, The Auk. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy article content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by The Regents of the University of California on behalf of the American Ornithologists’ Union for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee through the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), www.copyright.com. To reach the CCC’s Customer Service Department, phone 978-750-8400 or write to info@copyright. com. For permission to distribute electronically, republish, resell, or repurpose material, and to purchase article offprints, use the CCC’s Rightslink service, available on Caliber at http://caliber. ucpress.net. Submit all other permissions and licensing inquiries through University of California Press’s Rights and Permissions website, www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp, or via e-mail: [email protected]. Back issues of Ornithological Monographs from earlier than 2007 are available from Buteo Books at http://www.buteobooks.com.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Diverse Enantiornithine Family (Bohaiornithidae Fam. Nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with Information from Two New Species
    -76 第52卷 第1期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 pp. 31 2014年1月 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA figs. 1-11 A new diverse enantiornithine family (Bohaiornithidae fam. nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information from two new species WANG Min1,2 ZHOU Zhong-He1 Jingmai K. O’CONNOR1 Nikita V. ZELENKOV3 (1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 [email protected]) (2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049) (3 Borissiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow 117997) Abstract Two new enantiornithine birds, Parabohaiornis martini gen. et sp. nov., and Longusunguis kurochkini gen. et sp. nov., are reported here based on three nearly complete skeletons from the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine deposits of the Jiufotang Formation in Liaoning, northeastern China. The two new species share several unique features with Bohaiornis, Shenqiornis, Sulcavis and Zhouornis, including a robust rostrum with robust, subconical teeth, furcula with blunt omal expansions, sternal trabeculae caudolaterally directed, short and stout tarsometatarsus with hypertrophied ungual on digit Ⅲ. A close relationship among the two new species and four previously described taxa is confirmed by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, leading us to erect Bohaiornithidae fam. nov. With six known taxa, Bohaiornithidae is the most diverse recognized enantiornithine family. The robust morphology of the rostrum and foot suggests bohaiornithids occupied a specialized ecological niche compared to other Early Cretaceous enantiornithines. Key words Early Cretaceous, Jehol Biota, Enantiornithes, Bohaiornis, Shenqiornis, Sulcavis, Zhouornis 1 Introduction The abundant and continuous discoveries of exquisitely preserved plant, invertebrate, and vertebrate fossils from the Lower Cretaceous of China have made the Jehol Biota one of the world’s most important Mesozoic terrestrial biomes (Chang et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2003; Zhou, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Birds of China
    Mesozoic Birds of China by Lianhai Hou Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology Published by the Phoenix Valley Provincial Aviary of Taiwan Translated By Will Downs Bilby Research Center Northern Arizona University January, 2001 III Table of Contents Abvreviations for figures ..................................................................V Foreword by Delongjiang..................................................................X Foreword by Guangmei Zheng ..........................................................XI Foreword by Alan Feduccia............................................................XIII Foreword by Larry D. Martin..........................................................XIV Preface .....................................................................................XV Chapter 1. Synopsis of research Historical and geographic synopsis........................................................1 History of research ..........................................................................7 Chapter 2. Taxonomic descriptions...............................................................10 Sauriurae.............................................................................................11 Confuciusornithiformes Confuciusornithidae Confuciusornis Confuciusornis sanctus ........................................11 Confuciusornis chuonzhous sp. nov.........................33 Confuciusornis suniae sp. nov................................37 Jibeinia luanhera .........................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • A New Paravian Dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of North America Supports a Late Acquisition of Avian flight
    A new paravian dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of North America supports a late acquisition of avian flight Scott Hartman1, Mickey Mortimer2, William R. Wahl3, Dean R. Lomax4, Jessica Lippincott3 and David M. Lovelace5 1 Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA 2 Independent, Maple Valley, WA, USA 3 Wyoming Dinosaur Center, Thermopolis, WY, USA 4 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 5 University of Wisconsin Geology Museum, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA ABSTRACT The last two decades have seen a remarkable increase in the known diversity of basal avialans and their paravian relatives. The lack of resolution in the relationships of these groups combined with attributing the behavior of specialized taxa to the base of Paraves has clouded interpretations of the origin of avialan flight. Here, we describe Hesperornithoides miessleri gen. et sp. nov., a new paravian theropod from the Morrison Formation (Late Jurassic) of Wyoming, USA, represented by a single adult or subadult specimen comprising a partial, well-preserved skull and postcranial skeleton. Limb proportions firmly establish Hesperornithoides as occupying a terrestrial, non-volant lifestyle. Our phylogenetic analysis emphasizes extensive taxonomic sampling and robust character construction, recovering the new taxon most parsimoniously as a troodontid close to Daliansaurus, Xixiasaurus, and Sinusonasus. Multiple alternative paravian topologies have similar degrees of support, but proposals of basal paravian archaeopterygids, avialan microraptorians, and Rahonavis being closer to Pygostylia than archaeopterygids or unenlagiines are strongly rejected. All parsimonious results support the hypothesis that each early paravian clade was plesiomorphically flightless, raising the possibility that avian Submitted 10 September 2018 flight originated as late as the Late Jurassic or Early Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Tooth Vs. Beak: the Evolutionary Developmental Control of the Avian Feeding Apparatus
    Chapter 7 Tooth vs. Beak: The Evolutionary Developmental Control of the Avian Feeding Apparatus SHUO WANG,1 JOSEF STIEGLER,2 PING WU,1 AND CHENG-MING CHUONG1 ABSTRACT Recent discoveries of exquisitely preserved nonavialan and avialan theropod dinosaurs have not only prompted studies of theropod tooth morphologies, but have also provided information about the origin and early evolution of avian beaks. Recent studies on beak morphologies and morpho- genesis in Darwin’s finches have greatly improved our understanding of how avian beaks adapt to various ecological niches, but the question of how birds lost their teeth during the course of evolu- tion has long been debated. Evolutionary developmental experiments performed on extant bird embryos bridge the gap between paleontological and neontological evidence, suggesting that the avian beak could have originated through heterochronic truncation of odontogenesis over evolution- ary time. Here, we systematically review independently evolved regional and complete edentulism present in nonavialan and avialan theropod dinosaurs, and suggest that the tooth-reduction pro- cesses of different jaw bones are likely to be independently controlled. Through reviewing the recent advances of molecular regulations involved in tooth and avian beak morphogenic processes, we suggest that several molecules regulating the development of the avian beak also mediate the growth of keratinous rhamphothecae, and the divergence of odontogenic signalling pathways are likely to have accounted for both of these processes.
    [Show full text]