Socratic Club Speakers and Dates from the Marion E. Wade Center

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socratic Club Speakers and Dates from the Marion E. Wade Center Socratic Club Speakers and Dates - To Accompany the Stella Aldwinckle Papers Marion E. Wade Center, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL Name(s) Lecture Title Date Notes Prof. Krner Science and Moral Responsibility ? Dr. Mason, Prof. Demant Marxian View of Religion ? Won't Mankind outgrow Christianity in R.E. Havard, M.D. the face of the advance of science January 26, 1942 and of modern ideologies? In Socratic Dr. William Stevenson Is God a wish-fulfilment? February 2, 1942 Digest Was Christ really any more than a Stella Aldwinckle, M.A. February 9, 1942 great teacher and prophet? W. B. Merchant, M.A. and C.S. Lewis, Scepticism and Faith. February 16, 1942 M.A. Is Christianity obscurantism hindering Lord Elton February 23, 1942 social progress? Are there any valid objections to free- In Socratic Charles Williams March 2, 1942 love? Digest Dr. L. W. Grensted Is prayer auto-suggestion? March 9, 1942 Some ambiguities in the use of the D. M. MacKinnon, M.A. April 29, 1942 word 'rational.' Is it rational to believe in a 'personal' Prof. W. G. De Burgh God? (postponed until May 27 due to May 6, 1942 illness of the speaker) Rev. A. M. Farrer and Prof. R. Eisler Did Christ rise from the dead? May 13, 1942 Can science render religion In Socratic Prof. H. A. Hodges May 20, 1942 unnecessary? Digest Is it rational to believe in a 'personal' Prof. W.G. De Burgh May 27, 1942 God? Has man a special place in the Dr. R. W. Kosterlitz June 3, 1942 universe? In Socratic Mr. J. Z. Young Purpose and design in nature. October 12, 1942 Digest Is a 'mechanistic' view of the universe Dr. Motz October 19, 1942 scientifically tenable? Mr. D. M. MacKinnon The concept of revelation. October 26, 1942 In Socratic Rev. A. M. Farrer How was Jesus divine? November 2, 1942 Digest Prof. E. O. James Christianity and other world faiths. November 9, 1942 Christianity and Aesthetics, or 'The Mr. C.S. Lewis November 16, 1942 Company accepts no liabilities.' Is Christian sexual morality narrow- In Socratic Fr. Gerald Vann, O.P. November 23, 1942 minded and out of date? Digest Does Christianity foreclose Mr. D. M. MacKinnon January 18, 1943 philosophical enquiry? Rev. F. C. Bryan What is prayer? January 25, 1943 In Socratic Prof. O. C. Quick Free-will and Predestination. February 1, 1943 Digest If we have Christ's ethics does the In Socratic Mr. C.S. Lewis February 8, 1943 rest of the Christian faith matter? Digest Fr. d'ARCY, S.J. Can the existence of God be proved? February 15, 1943 Dr. F. Sherwood-Taylor Science and Faith. February 22, 1943 Page 1 Name(s) Lecture Title Date Notes The political revelance of Christian Rev. Dr. V. A. Demant March 1, 1943 metaphysics. Is the New Testament reliable Fr. Kehoe, O.P. May 3, 1943 evidence? Rev. A. M. Farrer Immortality. May 10, 1943 Dr. R. Scott-Frayn. The Fall and the Unconscious. May 17, 1943 Dr. William Stephenson and Prof. L. W. In Socratic Conscience and moral freedom. May 24, 1943 Grensted Digest C.S. Lewis Anthropomorphism May 31, 1943 Prof. John MacMurray and Dr. Cosslett Marxism and Christianity. June 14, 1943 Dom B. C. Butler, O.S.B. Mysticism. June 21, 1943 In Socratic Dr. Falk and Mr. C.S. Lewis Morals without Faith. October 16, 1943 Digest In Socratic Fr. d'ARCY, S.J. Reason and Faith. October 25, 1943 Digest In Socratic Rev. A. M. Farrer Can we know that God Exists? November 1, 1943 Digest In Socratic Prof. L. W. Hodgson Christianity and Philosophy. November 8, 1943 Digest Mr. C.S. Lewis Science and Miracles. November 15, 1943 Mr. G. E. Harvey Buddhism. November 22, 1943 Fr. Kehoe, O.P. Inspiration in Art in Scripture. November 29, 1943 Mr. Pickard-Cambridge The Concept of Reason. January 17, 1944 Dr. C. E. M. Joad and Mr. C.S. Lewis On Being Reviewed by Christians January 24, 1944 Bulverism,' or The Foundations of In Socratic Mr. C.S. Lewis February 7, 1944 20th Century Thought. Digest Mr. J. K. White and Mr. G. B. Preston Materialism and Agnosticism. February 14, 1944 Mr. John Layard Christianity and Psycho-Neurosis. February 21, 1944 In Socratic Mr. Whitteridge Can Science provide our Ethics? February 28, 1944 Digest The Significance of Reinhold Niebuhr Mr. D. M. MacKinnon March 3, 1944 for Contemporary Thought. In Socratic Mr. J. K. Spalding Socrates. April 24, 1944 Digest P.D. Medawar, Austin Farrer "Explaining" the Universe May 1, 1944 Mr. L. Mannheim and Mr. G. H. L. Free-will and Determinism. May 8, 1944 Andrew In Socratic Prof. H. A. Hodges Philosophy To-day. May 15, 1944 Digest Concerning the Question : 'Jesus, In Socratic Stella Aldwinckle May 22, 1944 Prophet or Son of God'? Digest Rev. P. J. Thompson and Dr. Falk Duty and Delight. May 29, 1944 Mr. C.S. Lewis Is Institutional Christianity necessary June 5, 1944 In Socratic Prof. H. H. Price The Grounds of Modern Agnosticism October 23, 1944 Digest Dr. David Evans, Ph.D., and Rev. A. M. Is belief in a personal God compatible October 30, 1944 Farrer with modern scientific knowledge? In Socratic Mr. C.S. Lewis Is Theology Poetry? November 6, 1944 Digest Page 2 Name(s) Lecture Title Date Notes Prof. L. W. Grensted and Barbara Falk Has Psychology 'debunked' Sin? November 13, 1944 Similar title appears in Fr. Gerald Vann, O.P. Is Christian Sex-Morality out of date? November 20, 1944 1943 Socratic Digest Fr. d'ARCY, S.J. Rational and Irrational. November 27, 1944 In Socratic Dr. V. P. Whittaker Life and Matter. December 4, 1944 Digest Rev. J. N. D. Kelly The Gospels : History or Legend? Janaury 29, 1945 Michael Dalglish and Antony Curtis Poetry and Truth. February 5, 1945 Fr. R. Kehoe, O.P. Natural Law. February 12, 1945 Dr. F. Pringsheim and Dr. Mallik The Problem of Suffering February 19, 1945 Dr. E. Lambert and Mr. C.S. Lewis The Significance of Berdyaev February 26, 1945 It and Thou (Scientific Knowledge In Socratic Rev. Douglas Vicary March 5, 1945 and Personal Knowledge). Digest Rev. J. Hickenbotham and Fr. T. M. Justification by Faith. May 7, 1945 Parker Mr. D. M. MacKinnon Faith and History. March 12, 1945 Mr. C.S. Lewis Resurrection. May 14, 1945 Dr. Kramm Reason and Faith. May 21, 1945 In Socratic Rev. A. M. Farrer Can Myth be Fact? May 28, 1945 Digest In Socratic Rev. Gervase Mathew, O.P. Christian and non-Christian Mysticism June 4, 1945 Digest Mr. C.S. Lewis The Nature of Reason. October 15, 1945 Rev. A. Whitehouse The Nature of Faith. October 22, 1945 Rev. E. L. Mascall and Rev. John The Existence of God. October 29, 1945 Marsh Prof. L. Hodgson and a Unitarian Was Christ Divine? November 5, 1945 Prof. H. H. Price and Dr. A. M. Farrer Has Man a Soul? November 12, 1945 Dr. R. Eisler and Mr. Carritt Empirical Basis of Moral Obligation. November 19, 1945 Mr. A. Robertson and Prof. E. Marxist and Christian Views of the November 26, 1945 Cammaerts Nature of Man. Dr. David Evans The Atomic Bomb--and After. December 3, 1945 Mr. Shaw Desmond and Mr. C.S. Lewis Religion in the Post-War World. January 28, 1946 Mr. D. M. MacKinnon and Dr. D. Falk Morals and Religion February 4, 1946 Dr. C. H. Waddington and Dr. A. M. Can Science Provide a Basis for February 11, 1946 Farrer Ethics? Prof. L. W. Grensted Superstition and Faith. February 18, 1946 Dr. F. H. Heinemann and Mr. J. M. Reply to Historicism February 25, 1946 Urmson Hon. E. Plumer Rehabilitation - and then? March 4, 1946 Dr. Kosterlitz Religion and the Evolution of Man March 11, 1946 The Significance of Psychical G.L. Wilson May 6, 1946 Research G.E. Harvey Buddhism May 13, 1946 C.S. Lewis, H.H. Price Religion Without Dogma? May 20, 1946 J.L. Evans The Problem of Evil June 2, 1946 D.M. MacKinnon, D. Falk Morals and Religion. June 9, 1946 John Rosser Spiritualism as a Religion June 17, 1946 Page 3 Name(s) Lecture Title Date Notes Michael Foster, A.J. Ayer Belief and Reason in Philosophy. October 14, 1946 Friedrich Waismann The Limits of Positivism October 21, 1946 A.D. Howell-Smith, E.L. Mascall The Existence of God October 28, 1946 Arnold Lunn Is Progress Possible without Religion? November 4, 1946 R. Nicol Cross, T.M. Parker The Deity of Christ November 11, 1946 Frank Sherwood-Taylor Scientific World Outlook November 18, 1946 Lord Lindsay of Birker Kierkegaard December 2, 1946 The Objectivity of the Christian T.M. Parker, H.R. Trevor-Roper January 20, 1947 Revelation? Austin Farrer, R. Nicol Cross Is Dogma the Shackling of Thought? January 27, 1947 Douglas Vicary The Nature of Man February 10, 1947 Is Conscience More than a William Brown, J.C. Flugel February 17, 1947 Sociological Phenomenon? J.H. Scobell-Armstrong Is Pain Evil? February 24, 1947 Shaw Desmond Sex and Religion March 3, 1947 Richard Kehoe Myth, Pagan and Christian March 10, 1947 E.L. Mascall The Rationality of the Incarnation May 5, 1947 F.L. MacCarthy Losing One's Faith May 12, 1947 H.D. Lewis, C.S. Lewis Belief and Conduct May 19, 1947 Colin Hardie The Oedipus Myth May 26, 1947 J.N. Micklem Christianity and Other Faiths June 9, 1947 In Socratic Dr. A. M. Farrer and Mr. W. H. Walsh Does God Exist? October 13, 1947 Digest Mr. M. B. Foster Toynbee's Study of History.
Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium
    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Solved by Sacrifice' : Austin Farrer, Fideism, and The
    ‘SOLVED BY SACRIFICE’ : AUSTIN FARRER, FIDEISM, AND THE EVIDENCE OF FAITH Robert Carroll MacSwain A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 2010 Full metadata for this item is available in the St Andrews Digital Research Repository at: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/920 This item is protected by original copyright ‘SOLVED BY SACRIFICE’: Austin Farrer, Fideism, and the Evidence of Faith Robert Carroll MacSwain A thesis submitted to the School of Divinity of the University of St Andrews in candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The saints confute the logicians, but they do not confute them by logic but by sanctity. They do not prove the real connection between the religious symbols and the everyday realities by logical demonstration, but by life. Solvitur ambulando, said someone about Zeno’s paradox, which proves the impossibility of physical motion. It is solved by walking. Solvitur immolando, says the saint, about the paradox of the logicians. It is solved by sacrifice. —Austin Farrer v ABSTRACT 1. A perennial (if controversial) concern in both theology and philosophy of religion is whether religious belief is ‘reasonable’. Austin Farrer (1904-1968) is widely thought to affirm a positive answer to this concern. Chapter One surveys three interpretations of Farrer on ‘the believer’s reasons’ and thus sets the stage for our investigation into the development of his religious epistemology. 2. The disputed question of whether Farrer became ‘a sort of fideist’ is complicated by the many definitions of fideism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simplified Version of Gödel's Theorem Michael Redhead
    A Simplified Version of Gödel’s Theorem Michael Redhead “Isn’t it a bad thing to be deceived about the truth and a good thing to know what the truth is?” Plato Abstract The Lucas - Penrose argument is considered. As a special case we consider sorites arithmetic and explain how the argument actually works. A comparison with Gödel’s own treatment is made. Truth is valuable. But certifiable truth is hard to come by! The Case of Mathematics Does truth equate with proof? No: Gödel showed famously that truth outruns proof, even in the case of the natural numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, … The Lucas-Penrose argument The argument that ascertainable truth outruns proof in mathematics has been used by John Lucas and Roger Penrose to claim that human minds can do things which computers can’t do, and hence that minds can’t be (digital) machines. Quote from Lucas and myself: We are dealing with a different style of reasoning… an informal semantics concerned with truth rather than proof. Sceptics deny that we have such a concept of truth. We cannot prove to them that we have… (but) we have many intimations of truth, not all of which can be articulated as proofs. Sorites arithmetic This is the sort of arithmetic you learnt at school. The basic operation is moving from one number to the next along the number line and repeating the operation a finite number of times. Addition and multiplication are defined recursively in the usual way. So, addition is effectively reduced to adding one and one and one… repeatedly, and multiplication is repeated addition.
    [Show full text]
  • Whence Intelligibility?
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series I. Culture and Values, Volume 43 General Editor George F. McLean Whence Intelligibility? Edited by Louis Perron The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Copyright © 2014 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Box 261 Cardinal Station Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Whence intelligibility? / edited by Louis Perron. -- first [edition]. pages cm. -- (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series I, Culture and values ; Volume 43) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Comprehension (Theory of knowledge) 2. Philosophy. 3. Thought and thinking. 4. Reason I. Perron, Louis, 1963- BD181.5.W44 2013 2013036848 121--dc23 CIP ISBN 978-1-56518-290-5 (pbk.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Louis Perron Part I: Theoretical Reason Chapter I. Wittgenstein, Form, and the Criterion of Understanding 13 Robbie Moser Chapter II. Explanation, Principle, & the Idea of God 31 Leslie Armour Chapter III. Intelligibility, Metaphor, and Conceptual Transfiguration 47 Elizabeth Trott Part II: Practical Reason Chapter IV. Maritain, Aquinas, and the Intelligibility of the 61 Natural Law David J. Klassen Chapter V. Moral Intelligibility and the Social Imaginary 81 Sheila Mason Part III: Modern Reason and Its Challenges Chapter VI. Intelligibility versus Proof: Philosophical Method 95 in Pascal and Descartes Louis Groarke Chapter VII. Modernity and Intelligibility: A Comparison of the 115 Interpretations of René Guénon and Jacques Maritain David Lea Part IV: Specific Areas of Intelligibility: Knowing God and the Human Person Chapter VIII. Maritain and Intellectual Mysticism 131 David C.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion Blackwell Philosophy Guides Series Editor: Steven M
    The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion Blackwell Philosophy Guides Series Editor: Steven M. Cahn, City University of New York Graduate School Written by an international assembly of distinguished philosophers, the Blackwell Philosophy Guides create a groundbreaking student resource – a complete critical survey of the central themes and issues of philosophy today. Focusing and advancing key arguments throughout, each essay incorporates essential background material serving to clarify the history and logic of the relevant topic. Accordingly, these volumes will be a valuable resource for a broad range of students and readers, including professional philosophers. 1 The Blackwell Guide to EPISTEMOLOGY Edited by John Greco and Ernest Sosa 2 The Blackwell Guide to ETHICAL THEORY Edited by Hugh LaFollette 3 The Blackwell Guide to the MODERN PHILOSOPHERS Edited by Steven M. Emmanuel 4 The Blackwell Guide to PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC Edited by Lou Goble 5 The Blackwell Guide to SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Edited by Robert L. Simon 6 The Blackwell Guide to BUSINESS ETHICS Edited by Norman E. Bowie 7 The Blackwell Guide to the PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Edited by Peter Machamer and Michael Silberstein 8 The Blackwell Guide to METAPHYSICS Edited by Richard M. Gale 9 The Blackwell Guide to the PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Edited by Nigel Blake, Paul Smeyers, Richard Smith, and Paul Standish 10 The Blackwell Guide to PHILOSOPHY OF MIND Edited by Stephen P. Stich and Ted A. Warfield 11 The Blackwell Guide to the PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES Edited by Stephen P. Turner and Paul A. Roth 12 The Blackwell Guide to CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY Edited by Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix the Interpretive Turn in Phenomenology: a Philosophical
    Appendix The Interpretive Turn in Phenomenology: A Philosophical History* GARY BRENT MADISON1 McMaster University It is experience ... still mute which we are concerned with leading to the pure expression of its own meaning. [E]xperience is the experience of human finitude. 1 Phenomenology and the Overcoming of Metaphysics Richard Rorty has said of phenomenology that it is "a form of philosophizing whose utility continues to escape me/' and that "hermeneutic philosophy" is a "vague and unfruitful" notion.2 Remarks such as these should be of no surprisel coming as they do from someone who does not view philosophy as (as Hegel said) "serious business"-Le'l as a reasoned and principled search for the truth of things-but rather as a kind of "professional dilettantism" and whol accordinglYI sees no difference between philosophy and literary criticism. It is hard to imagine two philosophers (if that is the right term to apply to Rorty) standing in greater contrast than Richard Rorty and Edmund Husser!. Whereas in Rorty's neopragmatic view philosophy can be nothing more than a kind of "culture chat" and 1 inasmuch as it may have some relevance to actual practicel a criterionlessl unprincipled "kibitzing" and "muddling­ through/' Husserl defended phenomenology because he saw it as a means at last for making of philosophy a "rigorous science/' one moreover which would be of supreme theoretical-critical relevance to the life of humanity.3 One thing Husserl meant by his programmatic remarks on this subject in his 1911 Logos articlel "Philosophy as Rigorous Science/1'4 is that a properly • This paper is dedicated to the memory of Franz Vandenbuschel 5J.1 of the University of Louvain (Leuven)1 who forty-some years ago introduced me as a young graduate student to the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty and who was killed in a collision with a train in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • B Academy Review
    The British Academy THE NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES REVIEW July – December 2000 The British Academy 10 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AH Telephone:020 7969 5200 Fax: 020 7969 5300 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.britac.ac.uk © The British Academy 2001 Some contents of the Review may also be found in electronic form on the Academy’s web site at www.britac.ac.uk Cover illustration: ??????? iii Foreword The British Academy publishes a regular account of its activities by means of its biannual Review. Some readers may be unfamiliar with what the Academy is and what it does.The following pages seek to give a flavour of the variety of Academy activities, which range across a broad spectrum of scholarly endeavour both within the UK and on the international stage. First and foremost, the Academy is a Fellowship of scholars, elected for outstanding academic achievement in one or more of the disciplines of the humanities and social sciences. The active participation of these Fellows enables the Academy to conduct a wide variety of activities to support academic research, to stimulate scholarly debate and to promote the role of the humanities and social sciences to a wider audience. The activities undertaken by the Academy include the organisation of lectures and conferences, the sponsoring of major infrastructural projects that are adopted as Academy Research Projects, running a flourishing publications programme, facilitating international networks, and allocating research awards.This Review contains a section on each of the major areas of the Academy’s work. As well as material customarily to be found in a formal Annual Report, extracts from lectures and publications and specially commissioned articles are included that seek to offer an insight into the variety of academic endeavour promoted by the Academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Gödelian Arguments Against AI
    Gödelian arguments against AI Master’s Thesis ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Department of Information and Computing Sciences Faculty of Science Utrecht University Author: Jesús Rodríguez Pérez Supervisor: Dr. Gerard Vreeswijk Second reviewer: Prof. Dr. Albert Visser 2015 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Gerard Vreeswijk for his guidance and support in this project; for pointing to multiple suggestions and possible improvements regarding not only the content of this thesis, and in particular technical inaccuracies, but most valuably its form and discursive structure. His personal guidance on writing argumentative essays have proved to be a valuable source. I am also indebted to Prof. Dr. Albert Visser for proofreading this text and providing useful feedback in the form of sticky notes. I hope this work reflects the advice that in such respect I received from him. Last, but not least, a word of gratitude goes to my sisters and parents, for the contin- uous loving support they demonstrated me along the way. Without their everyday words of encouragement this thesis would not have come about in its current shape. iii Contents I Predicate logic, axiomatic systems and Gödel’s theorems 4 1 Preliminaries 5 2 The undecidability results 9 2.1 Generalization and acceptance . 10 3 An informal exposition of the proof 15 II The Gödelian arguments and learning systems 21 4 The arguments against Computationalism 22 4.1 Lucas’ argument . 23 4.2 Goedel’s argument . 27 4.3 The counter-argument from the standpoint of mathematical cognition
    [Show full text]
  • Marquette Studies in Philosophy Andrew Tallon, Series Editor Full List by Series Number
    Marquette Studies in Philosophy Andrew Tallon, Series Editor Full List by Series Number Links go to pages for each book. To Order Please Go to “Order Books” tab on Home Page or click here 1. Harry Klocker, SJ. William of Ockham and the Divine Freedom. ISBN 0-87462-001-5. ©1996. 141 pp. Paperbound. Index. $15. First edition sold out. Second edition, reviewed, corrected and with a new Introduction. 2. Margaret Monahan Hogan. Finality and Marriage. ISBN 0-87462-600-5. 121 pp. Paperbound, $15. NOTE: See #34, below for the second revised and updated edition. 3. Gerald A. McCool, SJ. The Neo-Thomists. ISBN 0-87462-601-1. ©1994. 3rd printing, revised & corrected, 2003. Paperbound, 175 pp. $20 4. Max Scheler. Ressentiment. ISBN 0-87462-602-1.©1998. 4th printing, corrected, 2003. Paperbound. Index. New Introduction by Manfred Frings. 172 pp. $20 5. Augustine Shutte. Philosophy for Africa. ISBN 0-87462-608-0. ©1995. Paperbound. 184 pp. $20 6. Howard P. Kainz. Democracy and the ‘Kingdom of God.’ ISBN 0-87462-610-2. ©1995. Paperbound. Index. $25 7. Knud Løgstrup. Metaphysics. ISBN 0-87462-603-X. ©1995. Volume I. 400 pp. Paperbound. Formerly $40; now $20.00 ISBN 0-67462-607-2. Volume II. 400 pp. Paperbound. Formerly $40; now $20.00 8. Manfred Frings. Max Scheler. A Concise Introduction into the World of a Great Thinker. ISBN 0-87462-605-6. ©1996. Paperbound. Second edition, revised. Index. New Foreword by the author. $20 9. G. Heath King. Existence, Thought, Style: Perspectives of a Primary Relation, portrayed through the work of Søren Kierkegaard.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Alan Watts and the Academic Enterprise
    Introduction Alan Watts and the Academic Enterprise Peter J. Columbus and Donadrian L. Rice As in some economies the rich keep getting richer and the poor poorer, so in the overspecialized disciplines of modern scholarship the learned get more learned and the ignorant get more ignorant—until the two classes can hardly talk to each other. I have dedicated my work to an attempt to bridge that gap. —Alan Watts, 1975b, p. xx his collection of academic essays by Alan Watts serves to com- Tmemorate the centenary of his birth on the Feast of the Epiphany— January 6—in 1915. Watts was born into a middle-class family at Rowan Tree Cottage, in the village of Chislehurst, located on the outskirts of London. He was raised in the Church of England, educated at elite Anglican preparatory academies—including King’s School in Canterbury (1928–1932)—and studied at Seabury-Western Theological Seminary in Evanston, Illinois (1941–1944). Receiving the Sacrament of Holy Orders on the Feast of the Ascension, May 18, 1944, Watts served as Episcopal priest, chaplain and theologian at Northwestern University (1944–1950), professor of comparative philosophy at the American Academy of Asian Studies in San Francisco (1951–1957), and freelance philosopher (1958–1973), including visiting scholar at Harvard University (1962–1964). He held a Master of Sacred Theology degree from Seabury-Western Seminary (1948), an Honorary Doctorate of Divinity from the University of Vermont (1958), and was a Fellow of the Society for Arts, Religion, and Contemporary Culture. Watts integrated his Anglo-Catholic religious formation with knowledge of Buddhism, Daoism, and Hinduism toward resolving problems of ontological estrangement in the twentieth-century West (Morgan, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • BASIL MITCHELL Basil George Mitchell 1917–2011
    BASIL MITCHELL Basil George Mitchell 1917–2011 Career Outline ALTHOUGH BASIL MITCHELL was eventually to make his reputation as a philosopher of religion, his first interests suggested a somewhat different trajectory, perhaps in comparative religion. Born on 9 April 1917 to middle class parents in Bath (his father was a quantity surveyor), it was while living in Southampton that his mother became permanently confined to bed as a result of severe rheumatoid arthritis and remained there for the last twenty years of her life (1928–47). Although Basil was confirmed in the Church of England, his parents’ search for some relief for his mother’s condition led him along with the rest of his family to attend Sufi services of universal worship that included extracts from the sacred texts of all the major religions. Indeed, that search included taking his mother in 1938 to the Paris headquarters of Hazrat Inayat Khan who had brought this par­ ticular version of Sufism from India. Although Basil’s decision to read Greats at The Queen’s College, Oxford was quite conventional, it is signifi­ cant that he confesses to not finding the way philosophy was then taught particularly interesting and that the real satisfaction of his desires came when he was awarded a scholarship to study Indian philosophy under Radhakrishnan, then a professor at Oxford, and began to learn Sanskrit.1 1 Further details are available in Basil’s autobiography, B. G. Mitchell, Looking Back: on Faith, Philosophy and Friends in Oxford (Durham, 2009), and, more briefly, in ‘War and friendship’, in K.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Personalistic Reflection on the Body As a Contribution to Theology
    Teologia w Polsce 13,2 (2019), s. 5–26 DOI: 10.31743/twp.2019.13.2.01 Rev. José Granados* Pontificio Istituto Teologico Giovanni Paolo II Lateran University, Rome PHILOSOPHICAL PERSONALISTIC REFLECTION ON THE BODY AS A CONTRIBUTION TO THEOLOGY The article explores how Personalist Philosophy can be helpful for Theology by focusing on the concrete topic of the body. The renewed philosophical interest in the body is important for Christian Theology inasmuch as the latter is cen- tered on the concreteness of the Incarnation. The article follows Gabriel Mar- cel’s approach as a guideline to review the understanding of the body proper to Personalism. In this approach, the body is seen as the person’s relational pres- ence in the world and among others and as the openness of the person towards transcendence. The richness of this approach is explored in three important areas of dogmatic theology: Christology, Sacramentology, and the Theology of Creation. The article exemplifies the circularity between Philosophy and The- ology in the concrete topic of the body. In his Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr tells us about his way to conversion, which went hand in hand with a search for true philosophy. After doing away with the Pythagorean master (who asked for complicated mathematical studies) and the * Rev. José Granados – professor of dogmatic theology of marriage and family at the PontificalJohn Paul II Theological Institute (Rome), where he served as the vicepresident from 2010 to 2019. He is a consultor of the Vatican Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life, and to the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith.
    [Show full text]