W ABULAROO NAUGHTONI GEN. ET Spo Novo, an ENIGMA TIC KANGAROO (MARSUPIALIA) from the MIDDLE TERTIARY CARL CREEK LIMESTONE OF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

W ABULAROO NAUGHTONI GEN. ET Spo Novo, an ENIGMA TIC KANGAROO (MARSUPIALIA) from the MIDDLE TERTIARY CARL CREEK LIMESTONE OF Mem. Qd Mus. 19(3): 299-307. pis. 2. [1979] w ABULAROO NAUGHTONI GEN. ET SPo NOVo, AN ENIGMA TIC KANGAROO (MARSUPIALIA) FROM THE MIDDLE TERTIARY CARL CREEK LIMESTONE OF NORTHWESTERN QUEENSLANDo RESULTS OF THE RAY Eo LEMLEY EXPEDITIONS, PART 4 MICHAEL ARCHER* Queensland Museum ABSTRACT Wabularoo naughtoni gen. et sp. nov. is a middle to late Miocene kangaroo from the Carl Creek Limestone of Riversleigh Station, northwestern Queensland. The dentary morphology is potoroid-like but the molars are lophodont and therefore macropodid-like; the very large plagiaulacoid premolar shares characters of both groups. Its systematic and phylogenetic position are obscure. Although it may be structurally ancestral to either the potoroids or macropodids it post dates the appearance of both families in the fossil record. Tedford (1967) summarizes the Riversleigh Wabularoo gen. nov. fauna from the Miocene Carl Creek Limestone noting three diprotodontid genera including TyPE SPECIF.5:Wabularoo naughtoni gen. et sp. Bematherium angulum Tedford 1967, and an nov. undeterJ:Ilined genus of kangaroos. In 1976, the GENERIC DIAGNOSiS: It differs from all genera author and museum assistants Messrs H. of the Potoroidae (Hypsiprymnodon. Propleopus. Godthelp and R. Kohout made further collections Potorous. Caloprymnus. Bettongia and from the Carl Creek limestone at the locality Aepyprymnus) in having lophodont molars. It referred to by Tedford ( 1967, figs. 1-2) as '0'. differs from all genera of the Macropodidae in These collections included two additional genera having a combination of a short, shallow, swollen of kangaroos, as well as crocodiles, birds, and dentary with a greatly enlarged masseteric canal diprotodontids. and a trenchant but wide and tall plagiaulacoid The new kangaroo described here was found in PJ. Of all known macropodid genera, it most an isolated block of the very hard Carl Creek closely resembles the monotypic Hadronomas but Limestone. Using an electric jack-hammer, it was it also differs from the single species of this genus collected as part of a smaller chunk of limestone. (H. puckridgei) as follows: the molars have Fine preparation was carried out in the laboratory narrower anterior cingula; the PJ is proportionate- using a compressed-air vibrotool. ly much wider and taller-crowned, obliquely oriented in the tooth row, narrowed posteriorly, Terminology of individual teeth follows Archer with recurved more numerous and finer serrations, (1978a) and that of crown morphology follows and no buccal or lingual cingula. Archer (1976a, b) or Bensley (1903). Registration Origin of the generic name: Wabula (wa'bula} numbers prefixed with Fare in the palaeon- means 'long-time-ago' in the Waanyi language as tological collections of the Queensland Museum. spoken by Ms Ivy George of Riversleigh Station; roo is a common non-specific Australian term for SYSTEMATICS Superfamily: MACROPODOIDEA *Present address: School of Zoology, University of New Family: Incertae sedis South Wales. 300 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM a kangaroo. The generic name is regarded to be ORIGIN OF THE SPECIESNAME" In honour of Mr and Mrs E. Naughton, owners of Riversleigh Station, who masculine. graciously allowed us to work on the property as well as extended many kindnesses to us during our stay. Wabularoo naughtoni sp. nov. (Fig. I; PIs., I, 2) DIAGNOSIS: That of the genus until additionai species are known. HOLOTYPE-Queensland Museum F9177, broken right dentary with P3, M2_3' and part of M4. DESCRIPTION: The dentary is potoroine-like TYPE LOCALITY- From an isolated boulder of the resembling for example Bettongia and upper clastic arenaceous limestone member of the Carl Aepyprymnus in being short, heavy-bodied, with a Creek Limestone, site '0' (of Tedford 1967), Riversleigh marked inflection of the ventral border below the Station, northwestern Queensland. molar row, a prominent swelling of the lateral wall AGE- The absolute age is unknown but, based on faunal comparisons, the Carl Creek Limestone is below PJ, and a large and laterally swollen interpreted to be mid to late Miocene in age (Tedford masseteric canal. The point of inflection of the 1967, Archer and Bartholomai 1978). ventral border is below M4 as in some 30.8 5.1 4.8 4.9 4.5 \ \ ' , 9.8 16.1- 22.8. mJ \ ;m2\ / PJ" ,m4\8.0. 6.7-' 6.3-\.L-10.7 ~ r3.31 r3.2l r2.~ ./5~4 22.0 FiG I. Occlusal and buccal views of F9177, the holotype of Wabularoo naughtoni, showing measurements (in mm) and tooth nomenclature. In the buccal view, the intercusp distances 3.2,2.9 and 3.3 were measured between the metaconid (lingual end of the protolophid) and entoconid (lingual end of the hypolophid) of each lower molar. In measurements involving length of the broken M4, the posterior point is taken from the posterior edge of the posterior root. In measurements involving length of the PJ, the anterior edge is taken from the antero-most basal edge of the enamel. Molar widths were measured along axes passing transversely through the major cusps. Molar cusp heights involve only the protoconid (buccal end of the protolophid) and hypoconid (buccal end of the hypolophid). Abbreviations: m.c., masseteric canal in section; sym, posterior end of the symphysis. 302 MEMOIRS OF THE QUEENSLAND MUSEUM MJ: The morphology of MJ is as in M2 except as mid-Miocene Etadunna Formation (M. 0. follows: The whole tooth is larger; the protolophid Woodburne, pers. comm.) and at least one is subequal in length to the hypolophid; the high-crowned macropodid tooth is known from the protolophid is symmetrically concave anteriorly mid-Miocene Namba formation from the Frome and occlusally; the crest extending anteriorly from Embayment of South Australia (Archer and Rich, the metaconid to the anterior cingulid does not in preparation). These probably older occurrences have an inflection immediately anterior to the discount the first two of the above possibilities. metaconid; the anterior cingulid is lower such that There is at present insufficient information to its anterior edge is no higher than the midvalley of decide between the remaining three. the tooth; the trigonid is noticeably wider than the Speculations about kangaroo evolution and talonid and is the widest part of the tooth; the classification have been going on continuously anterior cingular shelf is longer; the swelling since Bensley's ( 1903) comparative study of the anterior to the entoconid is not as well-developed; teeth of marsupials. More recent speculation and there is a poorly-developed but distinct lingual concerning the relative primitiveness of the known vertical crest on the posterior flank of the subfamilies (e.g. Pearson 1950, Ride 1971, metaconid (this may also have been present in M2, Bartholomai 1972) has highlighted the fact that but the tooth is very worn in this area). there is still no agreement about whether potoroids were ancestral to macropodids, macropodids were M4: The hypoconid and posterior face of the ancestral to potoroids, or both groups were derived hypolophid are missing. The morphology of M4 is independently from a common ancestor referable as in MJ except as follows: There is a point of to neither group. There has even been renewed inflection between the anterolingual corner and interest and uncertainty about the composition of the end of the anterior cingulid and the base of the the subfamilial groups (e.g. Woodburne 1967, metaconid; the anterior flank of the entoconid is Kirsch 1968, Archer 1978b). Elsewhere (Archer not extended by a swelling, but rather projects 1978b) I have proposed a speculative rearran- gement of all kangaroo genera into two families: anteriorly. The Potoroidae containing the Hypsiprim- Meristic gradients along the tooth row: The nodontinae (Hypsiprimnodon and Propleopus) protolophid and trigonid increase in width from and the Potoroinae (all other potoroid genera); M2 to M4; the hypolophid and talonid also and the Macropodidae containing the Sthenurinae increase in width at least from M2 to MJ; the (possibly including the genera Sthenurus, preprotocristid increases in length from M2 to M4; Procoptodon. Setonix. Dorcopsoides. Dorcop- the anterior cingulid decreases in height from M2 sulus, Dendrolagus and Hadronomas) and the to M4; and the protoconid increases in mass from Macropodinae (containing all other previously M2 to MJ, but is subequal in MJ and M4° described genera). The Sthenurinae, in the expanded form used by Archer (1978b), is DISCUSSION essentially a plesiomorphic group and probably not monophyletic. WabuJaroo naughtoni is in most characters There are other different and as yet unnamed except molar morphology, a decidedly potoroid- middle Miocene Kangaroos, from central South like kangaroo. Its lophodont molars which also Australia (M. 0. Woodburne, pers. comm.) that lack posterior cingula are however decidedly cannot be referred to any of the previously non-potoroid-like characters. Its systematic and described subfamilies without significantly phylogenetic position within the MacroPo<ioidea altering the current concepts of these subfamilies. are therefore very much in doubt. There is a possibility that Wabularoo naughtoni WabuJaroo naughtoni could theoretically and these other aberrant taxa are referable to a represent anyone of at least five evolutionary fifth subfamily of kangaroos. I have not proposed stages: (I) a potoroid developing into a anew subfamily for W. naughtoni because of the macropodid; (2) a macropodid developing into a limited information provided by the single potoroid; (3) a specialized macropodid par;llleling dentary. It would be desirable to consider incisor potoroids; (4) a specialized potoroid paralleling and cranial structure as well, aspects of which are macropodids; (5) a representative of an as yet preserved in the Miocene material under study by unrecognized group equivalent in rank to known M. 0. Woodburne. kangaroo subfamilies but a derivative or ancestor The diprotodontids of the Riversleigh local of none of the other known groups. However. at fauna were concluded by Tedford (1967) to be least one undoubted potoroid occurs in the contemporaneous with or slightly younger than ARCHER: WABULAROONAUGHTONI.
Recommended publications
  • Mammals from the Mesozoic of Mongolia
    Mammals from the Mesozoic of Mongolia Introduction and Simpson (1926) dcscrihed these as placental (eutherian) insectivores. 'l'he deltathcroids originally Mongolia produces one of the world's most extraordi- included with the insectivores, more recently have narily preserved assemblages of hlesozoic ma~nmals. t)een assigned to the Metatheria (Kielan-Jaworowska Unlike fossils at most Mesozoic sites, Inany of these and Nesov, 1990). For ahout 40 years these were the remains are skulls, and in some cases these are asso- only Mesozoic ~nanimalsknown from Mongolia. ciated with postcranial skeletons. Ry contrast, 'I'he next discoveries in Mongolia were made by the Mesozoic mammals at well-known sites in North Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expeditions America and other continents have produced less (1963-1971) initially led by Naydin Dovchin, then by complete material, usually incomplete jaws with den- Rinchen Barsbold on the Mongolian side, and Zofia titions, or isolated teeth. In addition to the rich Kielan-Jaworowska on the Polish side, Kazi~nierz samples of skulls and skeletons representing Late Koualski led the expedition in 1964. Late Cretaceous Cretaceous mam~nals,certain localities in Mongolia ma~nmalswere collected in three Gohi Desert regions: are also known for less well preserved, but important, Bayan Zag (Djadokhta Formation), Nenlegt and remains of Early Cretaceous mammals. The mammals Khulsan in the Nemegt Valley (Baruungoyot from hoth Early and Late Cretaceous intervals have Formation), and llcrmiin 'ISav, south-\vest of the increased our understanding of diversification and Neniegt Valley, in the Red beds of Hermiin 'rsav, morphologic variation in archaic mammals. which have heen regarded as a stratigraphic ecluivalent Potentially this new information has hearing on the of the Baruungoyot Formation (Gradzinslti r't crl., phylogenetic relationships among major branches of 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Multituberculate Mammals from the Cretaceous of Uzbekistan
    Multituberculate mammals from the Cretaceous of Uzbekistan ZOFIA KIELAN- JAWOROWSKA and LEV A. NESSOV Kielan-Jaworowska, 2. & Nessov, L. A. 1992. Multituberculate mammals from the Cretaceous of Uzbelustan. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 37, 1, 1- 17. The first western Asian multituberculates found in the Bissekty Formation (Co- niacian) of Uzbekistan are described on the basis of a lower premolar (p4), a fragment of a lower incisor, an edentulous dentary, a proximal part of the humerus and a proximal part of the femur. Uzbekbaatar kizylkumensis gen. et sp. n. is defined as having a low and arcuate p4. possibly without a posterobuccal cusp; it presumably had two lower premolars, as inferred from the presence of a triangular concavity at the upper part of the anterior wall of p4, and p3 less reduced in relation to p4 than in non-specialized Taeniolabidoidea and Ptilodontoidea. Uzbek- baatar is placed in the Cimolodonta without indicating family and infraorder. It might have originated from the Plagiaulacinae or Eobaatarinae. Key words : Multituberculata, Marnmalia, Cretaceous, Coniacian, Uzbekistan. Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska. Paleontologisk Museum, Universitetet i Oslo, Sars Gate 1, N-0562 Oslo, Norway. flec A. Hecoc, kf~cmumym3exnoiL Kopbl, Ca~~m-nemep6ypzc~uiiYnueepcumem, 199 034 Ca~~m-l7emep6ypz,Poccun (Lev A. Nessov, Institute of the Earth Crust, Sankt-Peters- burg University, 199 034 St. Petersburg. Russla]. Introduction The Multituberculata is the first mammalian order to have adapted to herbivorous niches, although many may have been omnivorous (Krause 1982). Known from the Late Triassic to the Early Oligocene (Hahn & Hahn 1983), this order of mammals was dominant throughout the Mesozoic in most of the local faunas studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Masticatory Musculature of Asian Taeniolabidoid Multituberculate Mammals
    Masticatory musculature of Asian taeniolabidoid multituberculate mammals PETR P. GAMBARYAN & ZOFIA KIELAN-JAWOROWSKA* Gambaryan, P.P. & Kielan-Jaworowska, 2. 1995. Masticatory musculature of Asian taeniolabidoid multituberculate mammals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 40, 1, 45-108. The backward chewing stroke in multituberculates (unique for mammals) resulted in a more anterior insertion of the masticatory muscles than in any other mammal group, including rodents. Multituberculates differ from tritylodontids in details of the masticatory musculature, but share with them the backward masticatory power stroke and retractory horizontal components of the resultant force of all the masticatory muscles (protractory in Theria). The Taeniolabididae differ from the Eucosmodontidae in having a more powerful masticatory musculature, expressed by the higher zygomatic arch with relatively larger anterior and middle zygomatic ridges and higher coronoid process. It is speculated that the bicuspid, or pointed upper incisors, and semi-procumbent, pointed lower ones, characteristic of non- taeniolabidoid mdtitliberculates were used for picking-up and killing insects or other prey. In relation to the backward power stroke the low position of the condylar process was advantageous for most multituberculates. In extreme cases (Sloanbaataridae and Taeniolabididae), the adaptation for crushing hard seeds, worked against the benefit of the low position of the condylar process and a high condylar process developed. Five new multituberculate autapomorphies are rec- ognized: anterior and intermediate zygomatic ridges: glenoid fossa large, flat and sloping backwards (forwards in rodents), arranged anterolateral and standing out from the braincase; semicircular posterior margin of the dentary with condylar process forming at least a part of it; anterior position of the coronoid process; and anterior position of the masseteric fossa.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Microvertebrate Fauna of the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, Southern England
    ASPECTS OF THE MICROVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE EARLY CRETACEOUS (BARREMIAN) WESSEX FORMATION OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT, SOUTHERN ENGLAND By STEVEN CHARLES SWEETMAN M.A. (Oxon.) 1980 F.G.S. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, U.K. April, 2007 0 Disclaimer Whilst registered for this degree, I have not registered for any other award. No part of this work has been submitted for any other academic award. 1 Acknowledgements At inception of this project there was a significant risk that the Wessex Formation would not yield a microvertebrate fauna. I would, therefore, like to express special thanks to Dave Martill (University of Portsmouth) for his initial support and for securing the research scholarship which made this study possible. I would also like to thank him for his supervision, generous support, encouragement and advice thereafter. Special thanks also to Susan Evans (UCL) for her enthusiastic help and advice on all matters relating to microvertebrates in general, and lizards in particular, and to Jerry Hooker (NHM) for everything relating to mammals; also to Brian Gasson for his support in the field and for the generous donation of many exceptional specimens from his private collection. The broad scope of this study has engendered the help, support and advice of many others and I am grateful to all. At the University
    [Show full text]
  • David W. Krause
    1 Curriculum Vitae – David W. Krause Department of Earth Sciences Telephone: (303) 370-6379 Denver Museum of Nature & Science Fax: (303) 331-6492 2001 Colorado Blvd E-mail: [email protected] Denver, CO 80205 U.S.A. Web: http://WWW.dmns.org/science/museum- scientists/david-krause/ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Appointments: Lecturer, Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Michigan, 1981. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomical Sciences and Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony BrooK University, 1982–1988. Research Associate in Paleontology, Museum of the RocKies, Montana State University, 1985– present. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomical Sciences, Department of Geosciences, and Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony BrooK University, 1988–1993. Professor, Department of Anatomical Sciences, Department of Geosciences, and Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony BrooK University, 1993–2003. Research Associate in Geology, The Field Museum, Chicago, 1994–present. Research Associate, Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, NeW YorK, 2009–present. Distinguished Service Professor, Department of Anatomical Sciences, Department of Geosciences, and Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences (2003–2016); Program in Public Health (2009–2016); Department of Oral Biology and Pathology (2012–2016), Stony Brook University. Emeritus Distingtuished Service Professor, Department of Anatomical
    [Show full text]
  • First Mesozoic Mammal from Chile: the Southernmost Record of a Late Cretaceous Gondwanatherian
    Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile, 69 (1): 5-31 (2020) 5 FIRST MESOZOIC MAMMAL FROM CHILE: THE SOUTHERNMOST RECORD OF A LATE CRETACEOUS GONDWANATHERIAN Francisco J. Goin1, Agustín G. Martinelli2, Sergio Soto-Acuña3, Emma C. Vieytes4*, Leslie M.E. Manríquez5, Roy A. Fernández3**, Juan Pablo Pino6, Cristine Trevisan6***, Jonatan Kaluza3,7, Marcelo A. Reguero8****, Marcelo Leppe6*****, Héctor Ortiz3******, David Rubilar-Rogers9 and Alexander O. Vargas3******* 1CONICET-División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 2CONICET-Sección Paleontología de Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR, CABA, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 3Red Paleontológica U-Chile, Laboratorio de Ontogenia y Filogenia, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile. Las Palmeras 3425, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected] 4CONICET-División Zoología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 5Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geologia, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Av. UNISINOS 950, 93022- 000 São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] 6Laboratorio de Paleobiología de Antártica y Patagonia, Instituto Antártico Chileno, Plaza Muñoz Gamero, 1055, Punta Arenas, Chile. E-mail: [email protected] 7Fundación de Historia
    [Show full text]
  • Marsupialia; Diprotodontia) from Northern and Central Australia
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Miminipossum notioplanetes, a Miocene forest-dwelling phalangeridan (Marsupialia; Diprotodontia) from northern and central Australia Michael Archer, Pippa Binfield, Suzanne J. Hand, Karen H. Black, Phillip Creaser, Troy J. Myers, Anna K. Gillespie, Derrick A. Arena, John Scanlon, Neville Pledge, and Jenni Thurmer ABSTRACT Miminipossum notioplanetes represents a new Early/Middle Miocene family (Miminipossumidae) of phalangeridan possums recovered from the Two Trees Local Fauna from the Riversleigh World Heritage area in northwestern Queensland and the Kutjamarpu Local Fauna of the Tirari Desert in northern South Australia. Because of widespread convergence in key features of P3 and M1 among phalangeridan families, the interfamilial relationships of Miminipossumidae are uncertain. The age of the Kutja- marpu Local Fauna has been in doubt with estimates ranging from Late Oligocene to Middle Miocene. The new taxon raises to 15 the number of taxa in the Kutjamarpu Local Fauna that are shared with both Riversleigh’s Faunal Zone B (Early Miocene) and Riversleigh’s Faunal Zone C (Middle Miocene) assemblages. Although there is rel- atively little biocorrelative support for the estimate of a Late Oligocene age, doubt remains about whether the age is more likely to be Early or Middle Miocene. In terms of palaeoenvironmental implications, because both Riversleigh’s Early and Middle Mio- cene assemblages have been concluded to have accumulated in temperate, wet, spe- cies-rich lowland forests, the same or similar Early/Middle Miocene palaeoenvironments may well have extended into central Australia at the time when the Kutjamarpu assemblage was accumulating. Michael Archer. Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre (PANGEA), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; [email protected] Pippa Binfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Data
    Supplementary Information Diversity Data The Paleobiology Database [1] was used as the principal source for taxonomic ranges of the early mammalian genera. Much of the data in the Paleobiology Database came from Kielan- Jaworowska et al. [2], Lofgren [3], Clemens [4], Archibald [5], Hartman [6], Fox [7], Eaton and Cifelli [8], Montellano [9], Pearson et al. [10], and Lillegraven and McKenna [11]. Dental Functional Types For our purposes, triconodont refers to a molar with three primary cusps in a linear or obtuse- angled arrangement, such as in eutriconodontans, amphilestids, and morganucodontans. Symmetrodont molars are those with three primary cusps in a triangular arrangement and no talonid. Tribosphenic molars have dual-function trigonids and talonids such as in true tribosphenic eutherians, metatherians, and stem boreosphenidans, as well as pseudo-tribosphenic australosphenidans. Upper molars of plagiaulacoid multituberculates possess two rows of cusps and upper molars of cimolodont multituberculates have three rows, although the two dental types are also distinguished by number of incisors and premolars [2]. See Kielan-Jaworowska et al. [2] for descriptions of gondwanatherians, haramiyids, eupantotherians, and docodonts. One of the most contentious assignments for dental functional type involves the triconodonts (in the most general usage of the term) (see [71]). It should be noted, however, that even if alternative dental functional types were chosen for triconodont genera (e.g., if amphilestids were included with symmetrodonts instead of triconodontans), the overall diversity patterns of tribosphenic mammals and multituberculates relative to other dental types in the Cretaceous (the main focus of this portion of the study) would not be altered (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Ecometrics As a Proxy of Paleoenvironment Reconstruction in the Miocene Of
    Dental Ecometrics as a Proxy of Paleoenvironment Reconstruction in the Miocene of South America by Jackson Ples Spradley Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Richard F. Kay, Supervisor ___________________________ Blythe A. Williams ___________________________ James D. Pampush ___________________________ V. Louise Roth ___________________________ Doug M. Boyer Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 ABSTRACT Dental Ecometrics as a Proxy of Paleoenvironment Reconstruction in the Miocene of South America by Jackson Ples Spradley Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Richard F. Kay, Supervisor ___________________________ Blythe A. Williams ___________________________ James D. Pampush ___________________________ V. Louise Roth ___________________________ Doug M. Boyer An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 Copyright by Jackson Ples Spradley 2017 Abstract In this dissertation I compile modern mammalian faunal lists, as well as ecomorphological measurements on living marsupials and rodents, to relate the diversity of small mammals, specifically the distributions of their dental topographies, to the climates in which they are found. The emphasis of this dissertation is to demonstrate the potential of distributions of dental topography metrics as proxies for the reconstruction of paleoenvironments in the Miocene of South America. In Chapter 2, I compile complete, non-volant mammalian species lists for 85 localities across South America as well as 17 localities across Australia and New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 400.2KB .Pdf File
    https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1978.39.04 7 July 1978 PROPLEOPUS CHILLAGOENSIS, A NEW NORTH QUEENSLAND SPECIES OF EXTINCT GIANT RAT-KANGAROO (MACROPODIDAE: POTOROINAE) By Michael Archer,* Alan Bartholomai* and Larry G. Marshall! * Queensland Museum t Princeton University Abstract Propleopus chillagoensis is ^ described as a second species in the genus. The genus is rediagnosed. The new species differs markedly in details of premolar and molar morphology from the Pleistocene P. oscillans (De Vis), but reveals no additional information about inter- generic relationships. In the unique characters which differentiate it from P. oscillans, it is less like structurally ancestral forms such as Hypsiprymnodon than is P. oscillans, and could be a descendent of the lineage leading to P. oscillans. A specimen of Propleopus from the Pleistocene Wellington Caves is similar to P. chillagoensis, and suggests the possibility that the two species, or lineages leading to them, were contemporaneous during part of the Pleistocene, and probably represent end members of a late Tertiary radiation. Introduction nomenclature for individual premolar teeth, as Propleopus oscillans was described on the used elsewhere (e.g. by Bartholomai, 1972), is basis of a single dentary fragment by De Vis not used here, but not because it has been (1888). Since then a lower incisor and two shown to be any less appropriate than the sys- additional dentary fragments have been re- tem used by Archer (1974) and some other ported (Woods, 1960 and Tedford, 1955), as authors (e.g. Mahoney and Ride, 1975). well as a maxillary fragment (Bartholomai, 1972). All of this Pleistocene material has Rediagnosis of Propleopus Longman, 1924 been referred to P.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Paleoecology of the Paucituberculata and Microbiotheria (Mammalia, Marsupialia) from the Late Early Miocene of Patagonia
    10 Paleoecology of the Paucituberculata and Microbiotheria (Mammalia, Marsupialia) from the late Early Miocene of Patagonia Mar/a Alejandro Alu!ilo, Edgardo Ortiz-JaureguizaT, anti Adriana M. Candela Abstract ami li sis de los result ados de las mas as corporales y [a This chapter presents a paleoecological an alysis of non­ dietas, se reconocieran diversos nichos ecologicos: camivorous Sanlacrucian marsupials of the orders Paucituber­ pequen os a medianos insectivoros. pequenos a medianos culara and Microbiothelia. Different ecological niches are insecliv oros~ fru g i v oros y medianos a grandes ft1Jgiv oros. infen-ed [Tom estimates of bcx:Iy mass, diet, and iocomOior Nuestros resultados nos pemliten coneluir qu e lo s Pauej­ behavior. Body masses were estimated using a regression tu berculata y los Microbiothe ria de la FOlmaci6n Santa analysis based on living marsupials. Possible dietary prefer­ Cruz constituyen ull agregado ecologicamente diverso ences were explored by an analys is of the developmeut ofmolar que habit6 zonas boscosas. desarrolladas bajo un clima shearing crests. Inferences about locomotor behaviors of some calid o y con lIu vias estac ionales. ESlas zonas habrian spec ies with we ll -preserved postcran iaJ skeletal remains were ofrecido una amplia diversidad de recursos fanlo espa­ deJived from a publ is hed morphofunctional analysis. From the ciale!-. como troficos para los diversos ni chos ecologicos wide range of estimat.ed body masses and diet several niches de los marslipiaies no carn lvoros. Nuestfa reconstrucci6n were infened: small- to medium-sized insecti vores, small- to paleoambiental es compatible con la ex isrencia de hetero­ medium-sized insectivore-frugivores, and medium- to large­ geneidad arnbie nl al dmante el Sanl<lCfUCenSe, inferencia sized fmgi vores.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 Pa'iterns of Evolution in the Mammalian
    Reprinted from: "Patterns of Evolution" edited by A. Hallam C> 1977 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam CHAPTER 15 PA'ITERNS OF EVOLUTION IN THE MAMMALIAN FOSSIL RECORD PmLIP D. GINGERICH Introduction Mammals are the most successful and most intelligent of land vertebrates. While most mammals today remain terrestrial like the ancestral mammalian stock, one progressive group has invaded the air and others have invaded the sea. Living mammals differ rather sharply from other living vertebrates in bear­ ing their young alive, in suckling their young (hence the class name Mammalia). and in sometimes "educating" their young. Mammals are warm-blooded, or endothermic, and their high metabolic rates make possible a sustained high level of continuous activity. Osteologically, living mammals also differ sharply from most other vertebrat.es in possessing a double occipital condyle on the skull, a single mandibular bone (the dentary) which articulates directly with the squamosal bone of the cranium, an eardrum supported by an ossified ectotym­ panic bone, three auditory ossicles, only two tooth generations - deciduous artd pemu!.nent, cheek teeth of c.omplicated morphology, a single bony nasal opening in the skull, and epiphyses on the long bones. While living mammals are well separated from other groups of vertebrat.es today, the fossil record shows clearly their origin from a reptilian stock and permits one to trace the origin and radiation of mammals in considerable detail. If one could choose any one anatomical system of mammals for preservation in the fossil record, the system yielding the most information about the animals would undoubtedly be the dentition, and it is fortunate that this is the most commonly preserved element of fossil mammals.
    [Show full text]