Construction and Characterization of a Single Stage Dual Diaphragm Gas Gun Nathaniel Steven Helminiak Marquette University
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Construction and Characterization of a Single Stage Dual Diaphragm Gas Gun Nathaniel Steven Helminiak Marquette University Recommended Citation Helminiak, Nathaniel Steven, "Construction and Characterization of a Single Stage Dual Diaphragm Gas Gun" (2017). Master's Theses (2009 -). 441. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/441 - 1 - CONSTRUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SINGLE STAGE DUAL DIAPHRAGM GAS GUN by Nathaniel Steven Helminiak, B.S., E.I.T. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 2017 ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SINGLE STAGE DUAL DIAPHRAGM GAS GUN Nathaniel Steven Helminiak, B.S., E.I.T. Marquette University, 2017 In the interest of studying the propagation of shock waves, this work sets out to design, construct, and characterize a pneumatic accelerator that performs high-velocity flyer plate impact tests. A single stage gas gun with a dual diaphragm breach allows for a non-volatile, reliable experimental testing platform for shock phenomena. This remotely operated gas gun utilizes compressed nitrogen to launch projectiles down a 14 foot long, 2 inch diameter bore barrel, which subsequently impacts a target material of interest. A dual diaphragm firing mechanism allows the 4.5 liter breech to reach a total pressure differential of 10ksi before accelerating projectiles to velocities as high as 1,000 m/s (1570-2240 mph). The projectile’s velocity is measured using a series of break pin circuits. The target response can be measured with Photon Doppler Velocimetry (PDV) and/or stress gauge system. A vacuum system eliminates the need for pressure relief in front of the projectile, while additionally allowing the system to remain closed over the entire firing cycle. Characterization of the system will allow for projectile speed to be estimated prior to launching based on initial breach pressure. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I submit this thesis to the public for review with the utmost thanks to God, my family, mentors, friends, and sponsors for their help and support throughout the process of generating this work. I am truly grateful for the unconditional love of my family, as there is no way that I would have made it this far without their support. Further, Dr. John Borg, my advisor for the majority of my higher academic career has provided an education that extends beyond pure scholasticism and has informed some of the greatest choices in my life to date. I can think of few thesis topics quite as extraordinary as the construction and characterization of a gas gun. My thanks are also extended to the members of my committee: Dr. Casey Allen, Dr. Anthony Bowman, Dr. Johnathan Fleischmann, and Dr. Hyunjae Park, for their mentorship and commitment to my education since my arrival in the undergraduate program at Marquette University. They, in addition to the other professors and professionals, working within the Opus College of Engineering have each provided innumerable opportunities to grow and develop. My gratitude goes out to the members of the shock physics lab, especially Jeff Lajeunesse, Merit Schumaker, Peter Sable, Chris Johnson, Logan Beaver, Ashley Hatzenbihler, and Emilie Teitz. Finally, I thank the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and by extension the United States of America for providing the means and freedoms to pursue my education. From Proverbs 25:2, “It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings.” My opportunity to pursue the glory of kings has been provided in hours of expertise and patience on the part of many people. I continue to pray that I someday might be able to provide to others the same gifts others have shared with myself. -Nathaniel ϟteven Helminiak ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 1.1 Motivation ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 History and Review ............................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Ballistics in History: A Path to Gas Gun Technology and Shock Physics ... 2 1.2.2 A Brief History of Shock Physics and Numerical Tools ............................. 15 1.2.3 The Gas Gun ............................................................................................... 18 1.2.4 Marquette’s History of Shock and Gas Guns ............................................. 32 2. CONSTRUCTION ...................................................................................................54 2.1 Static Gun Components ................................................................................... 55 2.1.1 Breach ......................................................................................................... 55 2.1.2 Barrel .......................................................................................................... 70 2.1.3 Sabot ........................................................................................................... 73 2.1.4 Target Tank ................................................................................................. 77 2.1.5 Catch Tank .................................................................................................. 87 2.2 Active Gun Components .................................................................................. 96 2.2.1 Control System ............................................................................................ 96 2.2.2 Pressurization System ............................................................................... 108 2.2.3 Distribution System ................................................................................... 113 2.2.4 Dual Diaphragm Launch System .............................................................. 117 2.2.5 Light Gate Assembly ................................................................................. 120 2.2.6 Photon Doppler Velocimetry and Dynasen Pin System ............................ 124 2.2.7 Vacuum System ......................................................................................... 136 2.2.8 Some Notes on Machining ........................................................................ 141 3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP ...................................................................................147 3.1 Firing Procedure and Safety Protocol .......................................................... 148 4. THEORETICAL VS. EXPERIMENTAL GUN BEHAVIOR ..........................157 4.1 Breach Charging Time................................................................................... 157 4.2 Burst Disk Failure .......................................................................................... 160 iii 4.3 Taylor Testing ................................................................................................. 175 4.4 Catch Tank Pull Down ................................................................................... 178 4.5 Muzzle Velocity .............................................................................................. 186 4.6 Post Shot Pressure .......................................................................................... 212 4.7 Gun Recoil ....................................................................................................... 215 5. CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................216 5.1 Future Work ................................................................................................... 216 5.1.1 Gas Gun Improvements............................................................................. 216 5.1.2 Reinforcement of the Impact Plate and Target Tank ................................ 216 5.1.3 Target Alignment ...................................................................................... 217 5.1.4 Examination of Surface Finishes for use with PDV.................................. 222 5.1.5 Use of CTH and Shock Wave Theory for Experimental Design ............... 223 5.1.6 Experimental Testing ................................................................................ 224 5.2 Closing ............................................................................................................. 227 6. WORKS CITED.....................................................................................................229 Appendix A: Catch Tank Dimensions .........................................................................244 Appendix B: MATLAB Program for Anticipated Experimental Characteristics ..245 Appendix C: MATLAB Program for Non-dimensional Pressure Velocity Profiles 248 Appendix D: MATLAB Program for Agilent 602s Vacuum Curves ........................255 Appendix E: MATLAB Program for Light Gate Interpretation Single .csv file .....261 Appendix F: MATLAB Program for PDV Interpretation ........................................267 Appendix G: MATLAB Program for Burst Disk Selection .......................................271 Appendix H: CTH Flyer Plate Simulation ..................................................................275 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Mechanical Properties of AISI 4135 Steel [142] .....................................