DOCSLIB.ORG

Helotiales Poster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Helotiales Poster A new attempt to classify the families of the Helotiales Hans-Otto Baral1, Danny Haelewaters2 & Kadri Pärtel3 – 1Blaihofstr. 42, 72074 Tübingen, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]); 2Farlow Herbarium, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; 3Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Chemicum, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, Estonia INTRODUCTION – This study arose from a compilation of the non-lichenized discomycetes for the 13th edition of ‘A. Engler’s Syllabus of Plant due to taxon sampling errors and/or lack of more gene regions. We consider this presentation as a stimulus for further work, which Families’, in which some new families were established and forgotten ones resurrected. It includes recent, partly unpublished results and tries to combine should include more, also protein-coding, gene regions. The families are mostly well represented with high bootstrap support, and also morphological and molecular data. 24 families and some undescribed lineages are here proposed in the Helotiales sensu stricto (excluding Leotiales, Phacidiales, some family associations show high support. Some unexpected results are worth of mention: (1) Roseodiscus formosus does not cluster with and some other orders). Paraphyletic groups are accepted whenever obvious morphological support is noted. A pragmatic approach based mainly on the type R. rhodoleucus; (2) Crocicreas requires restriction to the type C. gramineum, while the large genus Cyathicula is unrelated to them; (3) morphology tries to arrange these 24 families in 4 main groups (A-D). Our phylogenetic analysis hardly represents these groups, although it shows high encoelioid taxa turned out to belong in various families, E. fuckelii in Chaetomellaceae, E. fascicularis in Sclerotiniaceae, E. tiliacea in bootstrap support for most of the proposed families. The lack of support at the basal nodes of the tree indicates limitations of our data, which might be Rutstroemiaceae, E. heteromera and E. fimbriata in Cordieritidaceae, and the type E. furfuracea in Cenangiaceae. A large number of helotialean genera are still unsequenced, and even some sequenced ones cannot presently be placed in any of the presently recognized families. ML phylogenetic analysis based on ITS+LSU rDNA Calloria_neglecta Calloriaceae 100 Psilachnum_sp._KUS-F52448 C 89 Psilachnum_staphyleae ?Psilachnum D Chaetomellaceae 64 Rommelaarsia_sp._HB9684 Mitrulaceae Roseodiscus_subcarneus_DH314a * Roseodiscus ? Ascocorticiaceae Rodwayella_citrinula_KUS-F52443 ”Rodwayella” ? 84 Roseodiscus_lapponicus Roseodiscus ? Roseodiscus_rhodoleucus_HB8488 100 Erysiphe_mayorii_MUMH_3952 INCERTAE SEDIS Erysiphe_quercicola_MUMH_3796 Erysiphales 100 Stamnaria_americana_HB7261 100 Stamnaria_laetissima_FC2732T39244 Stamnaria lineage ? Fam. Ascocorticiaceae J.Schröt. - 3 Stamnaria_sp._NVF3519 * 94 Heyderia_abietis * A genera (3): Ascocorticium (= Acrodontium, 98 Chlorencoelia_torta_KUS-F52256 Cenangiaceae 96 Lambertella_corni_CLX4075 A Laricina), Ascocorticiellum, Ascosorus 100 Rutstroemia_firma_CBS_341.62 Rutstroemiaceae 100 Pycnopeziza_sympodialis Ciboria_americana_F-115887 Fam. Ascodichaenaceae D. 69 Ciboria_amentacea_HB2760 A Chaetomella (Zoellneria) 73 Monilia_laxa_SK278 Sclerotiniaceae Sclerotinia_sclerotiorum_KR1121_1 Hawksw. & Sherwood - 2 genera (4): Ascocorticium 96 Skyttea_gregaria_NY0118113 inamyloid 100 Cordierites_frondosa_HKAS41508 Cordieritidaceae A Ascodichaena, Delpinoina Ionomidotis_fulvotingens Pilidium (Discohainesia) Crocricreas_gramineum_NVF3527 Crocicreas ? Mitrula 99 Calycellina_populina_CBS_247.62 Fam. Chaetomellaceae Baral, P.R. 96 Calycina_herbarum_KUS-F51458 Pezizellaceae D Bisporella_citrina_AFTOL-ID_1301 Johnst. & Rossman - 4 genera (c. 80): Roseodiscus 86 Rodwayella_sessilis_HB9913 Mollisina_uncinata_KUS-F52307 Chaetomella (= Zoellneria), Pilidium (= Ascodichaenaceae Stamnaria-lineage 76 Venturiocistella_japonica_TNS-F18030 Crocicreas 72 Cistella_spicicola Calycina Hyphodiscus_hymeniophilus_MUCL_40275 Hyaloscyphaceae D Discohainesia), Sphaerographium, Synchaetomella Calycina 100 Hamatocanthoscypha_laricionis_TNS_F13530 -type Cistella_acuum Fam. Mitrulaceae Rchb. - 1 genus (5): -type Hymenoscyphus_epiphyllus_HB9911 97 Hymenoscyphus_fructigenus_FC-2375 B Mitrula 95 Bispora_antennata (= Bisporella pallescens) Cudoniella_clavus_AFTOL-ID_166 Helotiaceae 100 Cyathicula_coronatum_F-176601 Stamnaria lineage - 1 genus (c. 7): Cyathicula_cyathideum_NVF3616 Cyathicula_starbaeckii_NVF3620 Stamnaria (= Titaeospora) 99 Trichopeziza_mollissima_FC-2285 Crocicreas 99 Trichopezizella_otanii_FC-2156 D Trichopeziza_sulphurea_KUS-F52218 Lachnaceae Ascodichaena 80 Graddonia_coracina_ILLS_60491 Stamnaria Hymenoscyphus_parasazavae_HB8184 * Roseodiscus rhodoleucus 92 67 Lambertella_tubulosa_3T9D B 100 Hymenoscyphus_cf._imberbis_HB8294 Pezoloma_iodopedis_CUP59415 Helotiaceae Hymenoscyphus_kathiae_HB8616 88 Spirosphaera_floriformis_CBS_402.52 Sclerotiniaceae VBs Hymenoscyphus_rubi-idaei_HB7200 * Sclerotinia-type Rutstroemiaceae Chlorovibrissea_sp._PDD70070 Chlorovibrissea ?C GROUP A - Lachnellula_occidentalis_CBS_160.35 Lachnum_rhytismatis D Sclerotinia-type 100 Lachnum_rachidicola Helotiales Sclerotiniaceous and Dasyscyphella_nivea_BHI-F144 80 Lachnum_soppittii_FC2160 Lachnaceae Lachnum_virgineum_AFTOL-ID_49 Proliferodiscus_inspersus_KUS-52660 encoelioid taxa Incrucipulum_ciliare_HB9922 Brunnipila_fuscescens_KUS-F52031 Neobulgaria_pura 64 98 Ascocoryne_cylichnium_PDD75671 B Calycina-type Gelatinodiscus_flavidus_OSC_65796 (Chloroscypha) Gelatinodiscaceae 98 Xerombrophila_crystallifera Ombrophila_rehnana_HB8634 100 Clathrosporium_intricatum_ICMP14831 Subgroup I - Ionomidotic Torrendiella Rutstroemia 87 Articulospora_atra_CCM_F-01384 ? Hydrocina_chaetocladia_CCM_F-10890 Hydrocina Pyrenopeziza_brassicae_IMI_217176 reaction always absent, VBs partly Heterosphaeria_patella Ploettnerulaceae C Heterosphaeriaceae C Mitrula_paludosa_MBH50636 Mitrulaceae ? present Godronia_cassandra Godroniaceae A Ciboria Heyderia 100 Bryoglossum_gracile_MBH52481 VBs Velutarina Bryoclaviculus_campylopi_PDD101074 ?D Fam. Rutstroemiaceae Holst- 76 Roseodiscus_formosus_DH267b Bryoglossum lineage Cenangiaceae 95 Hyaloscypha_aureliella_M235 - Chlorociboriaceae Rhizoscyphus_ericae_UAMH_6735 Hyaloscyphaceae D Jensen, L.M. Kohn & T. Schumacher Olla_millepunctata 100 Arachnopeziza_aurata_TNS-F11212 Arachnopezizaceae D 6 genera (c. 55): e.g. Lambertella, Lanzia, Arachnopeziza_aurelia_TNS-F11211 Calycina-type Pezoloma_sp._Japan_NBRC103659 Rutstroemia (= Poculum), Torrendiella 95 100 Pezoloma_ciliifera_M283 B 100 Pezoloma_ciliifera_HB7818 Pezoloma lineage Pezoloma_scanicum_SH_06/07 Fam. Sclerotiniaceae Whetzel - 28 Pezoloma_sp._Massachusetts_E17 genera (c. 150): e.g. Botrytis (= Botryotinia), 92 Vibrissea_truncorum_JLF2113 Vibrisseaceae C 68 Mollisia_cinerea_AFTOL-ID_76 Mollisiaceae C 100 Durella_connivens Strossmayeria lineage C Ciborinia, Moellerodiscus, Monilinia, Mycopappus (= Strossmayeria_basitricha_ANM_2055 Loramyces_macrosporus_CBS_235.53 Loramycetaceae C Redheadia), Myriosclerotinia, Piceomphale, 82 Pilidium_concavum_CCTU_1200 100 Chaetomella_oblonga_BPI_843552 Chaetomellaceae ? Scleromitrula, Sclerotinia, Stromatinia Encoelia_fuckelii_GM_2014-12-14 Chlorociboria 100 Chlorociboria_aeruginascens_BHI_F-128b Encoelia 66 Chlorociboria_aeruginosa_UBC_F19715 Chlorociboriaceae A Fam. Cenangiaceae Rehm (= Hysterostegiella Cenangium ferruginosum Medeolaria_farlowii Trochila 85 Dermea_acerina_CBS_161.38 Medeolariales 66 Pezicula_sporulosa_M42 Hemiphacidiaceae Korf) - 15 genera (c. 97 Neofabraea_malicorticis Dermateaceae A Cordieritidaceae Neofabraea_alba 70): e.g. Cenangiopsis, Cenangium, Chlorencoelia, 100 Rhytisma_acerinum Ionomidotic reaction Cudonia_circinans_C319 Rhytismatales Crumenulopsis, Encoelia, Heyderia, Hysterostegiella, 99 Potebniamyces_pyri_AFTOL-ID_744 Bulgaria_inquinans_ZW-Geo52 Phacidiaceae Rhabdocline, Sarcotrochila, Trochila, Velutarina 87 Holwaya_mucida_B_70_0009352 Tympanidaceae 100 Thelebolus_globosus_ANT03-221 Cleistothelebolus_nipigonensis_F.Doveri 100 Geltingia_associata_TU45655 Thelebolales Phacidiales Eleutheromyces_subulatus_CBS_139.90 Helicogoniaceae Gelatinomyces_siamensis_KKUK2 (Myriodiscus) Subgroup II - polyphyletic Claussenomyces_atrovirens_CLA23671 Tympanidaceae 100 Microglossum_olivaceum_FH-DSH97-103 Leotia_lubrica_AFTOL-ID_1 Leotiaceae group comprising ionomidotic taxa 75 Propolis_versicolor_ILLS60497 Marthamyces_desmoschoeni_PRJ_R908 Marthamycetaceae ?Rhytismalates Leotiales 91 Sarcoleotia_globosa_HMAS71956 without VBs 93 Geoglossum_nigritum Geoglossaceae Tuber_albidum_S2877_TUB Fam. Dermateaceae Fr. – 3 genera (c. KOH KOH Diplocarpa * = unpublished taxa 70): Dermea, Neofabraea, Pezicula “Encoelia“ fimbriata “Encoelia“ heteromera 0.2 Fam. Cordieritidaceae (Sacc.) Sacc. – 14 genera (c. 115): e.g. Ameghiniella, Cordierites, Godroniaceae Table of selected characters of families and lineages here recognized within the Helotiales. Diplocarpa (= Ionomidotis), Llimoniella, Calycina-type ionomidotic Dermateaceae Rhymbocarpus, Skyttea, Unguiculariopsis Fam. Godroniaceae Baral - 4 genera (c. Pezicula-type 45): Ascocalyx (= Bothrodiscus), Atropellis, Godronia Ploettnera-type (= Fuckelia), Gremmeniella (= Brunchorstia) ? Fam. Chlorociboriaceae Baral & P.R. Johnst. - 1 genus (c. 22): Chlorociboria (= Dothiorina) KOH Pezicula Godronia Dermea B. GROUP B – Helotiaceous taxa Fam. Gelatinodiscaceae S.E. Carp. – 8 genera (c. 55): e.g. Ascocoryne (= Coryne), Ascotremella, Chloroscypha (= Gelatinodiscus),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Survey of Fungi at the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Field Station Bulletins UWM Field Station Spring 1993 A survey of fungi at the University of Wisconsin- Waukesha Field Station Alan D. Parker University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldstation_bulletins Part of the Forest Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Parker, A.D. 1993 A survey of fungi at the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station. Field Station Bulletin 26(1): 1-10. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Station Bulletins by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Survey of Fungi at the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station Alan D. Parker Department of Biological Sciences University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188 Introduction The University of Wisconsin-Waukesha Field Station was founded in 1967 through the generous gift of a 98 acre farm by Ms. Gertrude Sherman. The facility is located approximately nine miles west of Waukesha on Highway 18, just south of the Waterville Road intersection. The site consists of rolling glacial deposits covered with old field vegetation, 20 acres of xeric oak woods, a small lake with marshlands and bog, and a cold water stream. Other communities are being estab- lished as a result of restoration work; among these are mesic prairie, oak opening, and stands of various conifers. A long-term study of higher fungi and Myxomycetes, primarily from the xeric oak woods, was started in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Evaluation of Rrna Targeted in Situ Probes and Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fungi
    Development and evaluation of rRNA targeted in situ probes and phylogenetic relationships of freshwater fungi vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Christiane Baschien aus Berlin Von der Fakultät III - Prozesswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. sc. techn. Lutz-Günter Fleischer Berichter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Ulrich Szewzyk Berichter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Felix Bärlocher Berichter: Dr. habil. Werner Manz Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 19.05.2003 Berlin 2003 D83 Table of contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 MATERIAL AND METHODS .................................................................................................................. 8 1. Used organisms ............................................................................................................................. 8 2. Media, culture conditions, maintenance of cultures and harvest procedure.................................. 9 2.1. Culture media........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Culture conditions .................................................................................................................. 10 2.3. Maintenance of cultures.........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Patellariaceae Revisited
    Mycosphere 6 (3): 290–326(2015) ISSN 2077 7019 www.mycosphere.org Article Mycosphere Copyright © 2015 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/6/3/7 Patellariaceae revisited Yacharoen S1,2, Tian Q1,2, Chomnunti P1,2, Boonmee S1, Chukeatirote E2, Bhat JD3 and Hyde KD1,2,4,5* 1Institute of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 2School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 3Formerly at Department of Botany, Goa University, Goa 403 206, India 4Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China 5World Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China Yacharoen S, Tian Q, Chomnunti P, Boonmee S, Chukeatirote E, Bhat JD, Hyde KD 2015 – Patellariaceae revisited. Mycosphere 6(3), 290–326, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/6/3/7 Abstract The Dothideomycetes include several genera whose ascomata can be considered as apothecia and thus would be grouped as discomycetes. Most genera are grouped in the family Patellariaceae, but also Agrynnaceae and other families. The Hysteriales include genera having hysterioid ascomata and can be confused with species in Patellariaceae with discoid apothecia if the opening is wide enough. In this study, genera of the family Patellariaceae were re-examined and characterized based on morphological examination. As a result of this study the genera Baggea, Endotryblidium, Holmiella, Hysteropatella, Lecanidiella, Lirellodisca, Murangium, Patellaria, Poetschia, Rhizodiscina, Schrakia, Stratisporella and Tryblidaria are retained in the family Patellariaceae. The genera Banhegyia, Pseudoparodia and Rhytidhysteron are excluded because of differing morphology and/or molecular data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Relationships of Torrendiella and Hymenotorrendiella Gen
    Phytotaxa 177 (1): 001–025 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.177.1.1 The phylogenetic relationships of Torrendiella and Hymenotorrendiella gen. nov. within the Leotiomycetes PETER R. JOHNSTON1, DUCKCHUL PARK1, HANS-OTTO BARAL2, RICARDO GALÁN3, GONZALO PLATAS4 & RAÚL TENA5 1Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. 2Blaihofstraße 42, D-72074 Tübingen, Germany. 3Dpto. de Ciencias de la Vida, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Alcalá, P.O.B. 20, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. 4Fundación MEDINA, Microbiología, Parque Tecnológico de Ciencias de la Salud, 18016 Armilla, Granada, Spain. 5C/– Arreñales del Portillo B, 21, 1º D, 44003, Teruel, Spain. Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Morphological and phylogenetic data are used to revise the genus Torrendiella. The type species, described from Europe, is retained within the Rutstroemiaceae. However, Torrendiella species reported from Australasia, southern South America and China were found to be phylogenetically distinct and have been recombined in the newly proposed genus Hymenotorrendiel- la. The Hymenotorrendiella species are distinguished morphologically from Rutstroemia in having a Hymenoscyphus-type rather than Sclerotinia-type ascus apex. Zoellneria, linked taxonomically to Torrendiella in the past, is genetically distinct and a synonym of Chaetomella. Keywords: ascus apex, phylogeny, taxonomy, Hymenoscyphus, Rutstroemiaceae, Sclerotiniaceae, Zoellneria, Chaetomella Introduction Torrendiella was described by Boudier and Torrend (1911), based on T. ciliata Boudier in Boudier and Torrend (1911: 133), a species reported from leaves, and more rarely twigs, of Rubus, Quercus and Laurus from Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom (Graddon 1979; Spooner 1987; Galán et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Sexual and Asexual Generic Names in <I
    doi:10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.01.06 IMA FUNGUS · 9(1): 75–89 (2018) Competing sexual and asexual generic names in Pucciniomycotina and ARTICLE Ustilaginomycotina (Basidiomycota) and recommendations for use M. Catherine Aime1, Lisa A. Castlebury2, Mehrdad Abbasi1, Dominik Begerow3, Reinhard Berndt4, Roland Kirschner5, Ludmila Marvanová6, Yoshitaka Ono7, Mahajabeen Padamsee8, Markus Scholler9, Marco Thines10, and Amy Y. Rossman11 1Purdue University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA; corresponding author e-mail: maime@purdue. edu 2Mycology & Nematology Genetic Diversity and Biology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA 3Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Geobotanik, ND 03/174, D-44801 Bochum, Germany 4ETH Zürich, Plant Ecological Genetics, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland 5Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, 320 Taoyuan City, Taiwan 6Czech Collection of Microoorganisms, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic 7Faculty of Education, Ibaraki University, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512, Japan 8Systematics Team, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland 1072, New Zealand 9Staatliches Museum f. Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Erbprinzenstr. 13, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany 10Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt (Main), Germany 11Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA Abstract: With the change to one scientific name for pleomorphic fungi, generic names typified by sexual and Key words: asexual morphs have been evaluated to recommend which name to use when two names represent the same genus Basidiomycetes and thus compete for use. In this paper, generic names in Pucciniomycotina and Ustilaginomycotina are evaluated pleomorphic fungi based on their type species to determine which names are synonyms. Twenty-one sets of sexually and asexually taxonomy typified names in Pucciniomycotina and eight sets in Ustilaginomycotina were determined to be congeneric and protected names compete for use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascomycota
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 139, 2005 49 A PRELIMINARY CENSUS OF THE MACROFUNGI OF MT WELLINGTON, TASMANIA – THE ASCOMYCOTA by Genevieve M. Gates and David A. Ratkowsky (with one appendix) Gates, G. M. & Ratkowsky, D. A. 2005 (16:xii): A preliminary census of the macrofungi of Mt Wellington, Tasmania – the Ascomycota. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 139: 49–52. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (GMG*); School of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 54, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (DAR). *Author for correspondence. This work continues the process of documenting the macrofungi of Mt Wellington. Two earlier publications were concerned with the gilled and non-gilled Basidiomycota, respectively, excluding the sequestrate species. The present work deals with the non-sequestrate Ascomycota, of which 42 species were found on Mt Wellington. Key Words: Macrofungi, Mt Wellington (Tasmania), Ascomycota, cup fungi, disc fungi. INTRODUCTION For the purposes of this survey, all Ascomycota having a conspicuous fruiting body were considered, excluding Two earlier papers in the preliminary documentation of the endophytes. Material collected during forays was described macrofungi of Mt Wellington, Tasmania, were confined macroscopically shortly after collection, and examined to the ‘agarics’ (gilled fungi) and the non-gilled species, microscopically to obtain details such as the size of the
    [Show full text]
  • Pt Reyes Species As of 12-1-2017 Abortiporus Biennis Agaricus
    Pt Reyes Species as of 12-1-2017 Abortiporus biennis Agaricus augustus Agaricus bernardii Agaricus californicus Agaricus campestris Agaricus cupreobrunneus Agaricus diminutivus Agaricus hondensis Agaricus lilaceps Agaricus praeclaresquamosus Agaricus rutilescens Agaricus silvicola Agaricus subrutilescens Agaricus xanthodermus Agrocybe pediades Agrocybe praecox Alboleptonia sericella Aleuria aurantia Alnicola sp. Amanita aprica Amanita augusta Amanita breckonii Amanita calyptratoides Amanita constricta Amanita gemmata Amanita gemmata var. exannulata Amanita calyptraderma Amanita calyptraderma (white form) Amanita magniverrucata Amanita muscaria Amanita novinupta Amanita ocreata Amanita pachycolea Amanita pantherina Amanita phalloides Amanita porphyria Amanita protecta Amanita velosa Amanita smithiana Amaurodon sp. nova Amphinema byssoides gr. Annulohypoxylon thouarsianum Anthrocobia melaloma Antrodia heteromorpha Aphanobasidium pseudotsugae Armillaria gallica Armillaria mellea Armillaria nabsnona Arrhenia epichysium Pt Reyes Species as of 12-1-2017 Arrhenia retiruga Ascobolus sp. Ascocoryne sarcoides Astraeus hygrometricus Auricularia auricula Auriscalpium vulgare Baeospora myosura Balsamia cf. magnata Bisporella citrina Bjerkandera adusta Boidinia propinqua Bolbitius vitellinus Suillellus (Boletus) amygdalinus Rubroboleus (Boletus) eastwoodiae Boletus edulis Boletus fibrillosus Botryobasidium longisporum Botryobasidium sp. Botryobasidium vagum Bovista dermoxantha Bovista pila Bovista plumbea Bulgaria inquinans Byssocorticium californicum
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area
    Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area • Giuseppe Venturella Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Edited by Giuseppe Venturella Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Diversity www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Editor Giuseppe Venturella MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editor Giuseppe Venturella University of Palermo Italy Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Diversity (ISSN 1424-2818) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity/special issues/ fungal diversity). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03936-978-2 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03936-979-9 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Editor .............................................. vii Giuseppe Venturella Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Reprinted from: Diversity 2020, 12, 253, doi:10.3390/d12060253 .................... 1 Elias Polemis, Vassiliki Fryssouli, Vassileios Daskalopoulos and Georgios I.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Classification of Leotiomycetes
    Mycosphere 10(1): 310–489 (2019) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/7 Preliminary classification of Leotiomycetes Ekanayaka AH1,2, Hyde KD1,2, Gentekaki E2,3, McKenzie EHC4, Zhao Q1,*, Bulgakov TS5, Camporesi E6,7 1Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China 2Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 3School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 4Landcare Research Manaaki Whenua, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 5Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops, 2/28 Yana Fabritsiusa Street, Sochi 354002, Krasnodar region, Russia 6A.M.B. Gruppo Micologico Forlivese “Antonio Cicognani”, Via Roma 18, Forlì, Italy. 7A.M.B. Circolo Micologico “Giovanni Carini”, C.P. 314 Brescia, Italy. Ekanayaka AH, Hyde KD, Gentekaki E, McKenzie EHC, Zhao Q, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E 2019 – Preliminary classification of Leotiomycetes. Mycosphere 10(1), 310–489, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/7 Abstract Leotiomycetes is regarded as the inoperculate class of discomycetes within the phylum Ascomycota. Taxa are mainly characterized by asci with a simple pore blueing in Melzer’s reagent, although some taxa have lost this character. The monophyly of this class has been verified in several recent molecular studies. However, circumscription of the orders, families and generic level delimitation are still unsettled. This paper provides a modified backbone tree for the class Leotiomycetes based on phylogenetic analysis of combined ITS, LSU, SSU, TEF, and RPB2 loci. In the phylogenetic analysis, Leotiomycetes separates into 19 clades, which can be recognized as orders and order-level clades.
    [Show full text]
  • Phialocephala Cladophialophoroides Fungal Planet Description Sheets 359
    358 Persoonia – Volume 38, 2017 Phialocephala cladophialophoroides Fungal Planet description sheets 359 Fungal Planet 613 – 20 June 2017 Phialocephala cladophialophoroides Madrid, C. Tapia, V. Silva & M. Lafourcade, sp. nov. Etymology. The name refers to the morphological similarity between this Notes — This fungus was isolated from toe nail lesions of an fungus and members of the genus Cladophialophora. immunocompromised patient. The clinical case is currently un- Classification — Vibrisseaceae, Helotiales, Leotiomycetes. der study and will be reported elsewhere. The isolate remained sterile or sporulated poorly on routine mycological media, such On water agar with sterilised pine needles (PNA): Mycelium as malt extract agar or Sabouraud dextrose agar. Therefore, consisting of septate, branched, subhyaline to dark olivaceous it was grown on PNA in order to stimulate sporulation. On this brown, smooth to verruculose, thin- to thick-walled, 1–6 µm medium, undifferentiated fertile hyphae produced cladosporioid, wide hyphae, with moniliform segments showing swollen cells coherent chains of aseptate, subglobose to elongate dematia- up to 8 µm wide. Conidiophores micronematous, often reduced ceous conidia without dark scars. These morphological features to conidiogenous cells, pale to dark olivaceous brown, smooth closely resembled those of Cladophialophora (Chaetothyriales), to verruculose. Conidiogenous cells mostly subcylindrical, a genus which includes important clinically-relevant species 12–25 × 4–6 µm. Conidia in acropetal, simple, strongly cohe- with a broad clinical spectrum, including chromoblastomycosis, rent chains, mostly subglobose to subcylindrical, aseptate, pale phaeohyphomycosis, mycetoma and onychomycosis (Badali et olivaceous brown to dark brown, smooth-walled to verruculose, al. 2008, Brasch et al. 2011). BLAST searches with the ITS se- 5–17(–22) × (4–)5–6(–7) µm.
    [Show full text]
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus
    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
    [Show full text]