DOCSLIB.ORG

Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian Contending Economic Theories: Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian Richard D. Wolff and Stephen A. Resnick The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Contents Detailed Table of Contents vii To Our Readers xiii Acknowledgments xvi 1 Three Different Theories 1 2 Neoclassical Theory 51 3 Keynesian Theory 105 4 Marxian Theory 133 5 Late Neoclassical Theory 251 with Yahya M. Madra 6 Oscillations in Capitalism and among Economic Theories 311 7 The Importance of Theoretical Differences 347 Notes 379 References 383 Index 387 Detailed Table of Contents 1 Three Different Theories 1 1.1 This Book and Theories of Economics 1 1.1.1 Theories: Economic and Otherwise 4 1.1.2 Economic Theories in Disagreement 5 1.1.3 Are We All Economic Theorists? 6 1.2 Theories and Society 9 1.2.1 Changes in Europe and the Humanist Tradition 10 1.2.2 The New Economic Theories 12 1.2.3 Classical Political Economy 14 1.2.4 The History of Neoclassical Economics 14 1.2.5 The History of Keynesian Economics 16 1.2.6 Keynesian Theory 18 1.2.7 Return of Neoclassical Theory 21 1.2.8 Neoclassical and Keynesian Economics 23 1.3 The History of Marxian Economics 25 1.4 Comparing Different Economic Theories 33 1.4.1 Comparing Theories in General 33 1.4.2 The Logics of Different Theories 35 1.4.3 How Theoretical Differences Matter 36 1.5 An Introduction to the Three Theories 37 1.5.1 Entry Point, Objects, and Logic of Neoclassical Theory 37 1.5.2 Entry Point, Objects, and Logic of Keynesian Theory 40 1.5.3 Entry Point, Objects, and Logic of Marxian Theory 41 1.5.4 A Digression: Theories and Their Objects 43 1.5.5 The Logic of Marxian Theory 44 1.5.6 Communication among Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian Economists 47 1.6 Conclusion 48 viii Detailed Table of Contents 2 Neoclassical Theory 51 2.1 The Neoclassical Tradition 51 2.1.1 Neoclassical Theory ’ s Contributions 52 2.1.2 Emergence of Neoclassical Theory after Adam Smith 53 2.1.3 Which Economic Theory Will We Present? 55 2.2 Market Values: The Analytics of Supply and Demand 55 2.2.1 The Determinants of Supply and Demand 58 2.2.2 Markets, Private Property, Conservatives, and Liberals 60 2.2.3 Preferences: Determining the Demand for Commodities 64 2.2.4 Preferences: Determining the Supply of Labor 73 2.2.5 Preferences and Scarcity: Determining the Demand for Labor 77 2.2.6 Determination of Wages and Commodity Demands 81 2.2.7 Preferences: Determining the Supply of Capital 83 2.2.8 Preferences and Scarcity: Determining the Demand for Capital 88 2.2.9 The Determination of Returns to Capital 89 2.2.10 Distribution of Income in Society: Returns to Capital and Labor 90 2.2.11 Preferences and Scarcity: Determining the Supply of Commodities 91 2.2.12 Demand and Supply Again: Determination of Prices 95 2.3 Effi ciency and Markets 97 2.3.1 Adam Smith ’ s “ Invisible Hand ” 97 2.3.2 Pareto Optimality 101 3 Keynesian Theory 105 3.1 The Challenge of Keynes 105 3.2 The Neoclassical Answer to Capitalist Recessions 108 3.3 The Keynesian Answer to Capitalist Recessions 115 3.4 Investment Behavior 122 3.5 Post-Keynesian Economics and Other Reactions to Keynes 125 3.6 Role of the State in Capitalist Society 129 Appendix: Rational Expectations 131 4 Marxian Theory 133 4.1 The Marxian Tradition and Its Theories 133 4.1.1 Marx ’ s Contributions 135 4.1.2 Marxism since Marx 138 4.1.3 Which Marxian Theory Will We Present? 140 Detailed Table of Contents ix 4.2 The Logical Structure of Marxian Theory 142 4.2.1 The Basic Concepts of Marxian Economics 142 4.2.2 Overdetermination and Process 143 4.2.3 Contradictions 147 4.2.4 Processes, Activities, and Relationships 148 4.2.5 A Theoretical Dilemma 149 4.2.6 Marxian Theory and Its Entry Point 150 4.2.7 The Class Process 152 4.3 The Marxian Concept of Class Elaborated 153 4.3.1 The Fundamental Class Process and Exploitation 154 4.3.2 The Subsumed Class Process 157 4.3.3 Different Forms of the Fundamental Class Process 160 4.3.4 Social Formations and Social Transitions 164 4.4 The Capitalist Fundamental Class Process and Commodities 165 4.4.1 Products, Markets, and Commodities 166 4.4.2 Commodity Values 167 4.4.3 Commodities and Fundamental Class Processes 168 4.4.4 Marx ’ s Labor Theory of Capitalist Commodity Values 169 4.4.5 Surplus Value of Capitalist Commodities 171 4.4.6 A Summary of Marxian Value Theory 172 4.5 Capitalists and Laborers 173 4.5.1 What Are Capitalists? 174 4.5.2 What Are Laborers? 176 4.5.3 Exploitation 177 4.5.4 Class Struggles 181 4.5.5 The Complexity of Industrial Capitalist Firms 182 4.5.6 Competition 185 4.5.7 Competition and the Accumulation of Capital 188 4.6 Capitalist Economies and Social Development 189 4.6.1 Growth of a Capitalist World Economy 189 4.6.2 Capitalism and Real Incomes 192 4.6.3 Cycles or Crises of Capitalist Economies 195 4.6.4 Cycles and Policy “ Solutions ” 200 4.7 Capitalist Subsumed Classes 203 4.7.1 Moneylenders and Subsumed Classes 203 4.7.2 Managers and Subsumed Classes 205 4.7.3 Merchants and Subsumed Classes 207 4.7.4 Other Capitalist Subsumed Classes 210 4.8 Class Positions and Individuals ’ Incomes 214 4.8.1 Class Processes and the Distribution of Income 214 4.8.2 Occupying Multiple Class and Nonclass Positions 216 x Detailed Table of Contents 4.9 The Complex Class Structure of Capitalist Firms 218 4.9.1 Class Analysis of Capitalist Firms 219 4.9.2 Capitalists and Corporate Boards of Directors 221 4.9.3 A Marxian Theory of Industrial Profi t 223 4.10 The Complex Class Structure of Other Social Sites 227 4.10.1 Class Analysis and Households 228 4.10.2 Class Analysis and the State 232 4.10.3 Class Analysis and International Relations 238 Appendix A: Why Does Marxian Theory Make Class Its Entry Point? 242 Appendix B: The “ Transformation Problem ” 243 Appendix C: Capitalist Competition 246 Appendix D: Rising Exploitation with Rising Real Wages 250 5 Late Neoclassical Theory 251 with Yahya M. Madra 5.1 Introduction: Why This Chapter? 251 5.1.1 Criticisms and Their Consequences 252 5.1.2 The Responses: An Overview 255 5.2 Theories of Market Imperfections 258 5.2.1 Externalities and Ways of Managing Them 259 5.2.2 Forms of Imperfect Competition 266 5.2.3 Transaction Costs and Economic Organization 274 5.2.4 Information Failures and Missing Markets 277 5.3 New Theories of Human Behavior 279 5.3.1 Theories of Motivational Diversity 283 5.3.2 Theories of Bounded Rationality 287 5.3.3 Behavioral Economics 288 5.4 New Theories of Equilibrium 292 5.4.1 Different Notions of Equilibrium in the Neoclassical Tradition 294 5.4.2 Nash Equilibrium and Classical Game Theory 297 5.4.3 Evolutionary Stability and Evolutionary Game Theory 304 5.5 Conclusion 308 6 Oscillations in Capitalism and among Economic Theories 311 6.1 Capitalism Has Always Been Changing 311 6.1.1 Instabilities and Capitalism 312 6.1.2 Capitalism and Economic Theories 314 6.1.3 How Economic Crises Infl uenced Economic Theories 315 6.2 Oscillations of Economy and Oscillations of Theory 320 6.2.1 Classical Political Economy and Marxism 320 Detailed Table of Contents xi 6.2.2 Neoclassical Economics 327 6.2.3 Neoclassical versus Marxian 329 6.2.4 Keynesian Economics 331 6.3 Two Modern Oscillations: The 1970s and the Crisis That Began in 2007 336 6.3.1 Three Collapses: State Intervention, Keynesianism, and Orthodox Marxism 336 6.3.2 From State- to Private-Capitalism: The Starkest Case 338 6.3.3 Back to State Intervention 341 7 The Importance of Theoretical Differences 347 7.1 Marxian versus Keynesian versus Neoclassical Theory 347 7.1.1 Different Points of Entry 347 7.1.2 Different Logics 348 7.1.3 Different Objects of Analysis 351 7.1.4 Different Theories of Value 352 7.2 Analytical Consequences of Contending Theories 352 7.2.1 Income Distribution: The Neoclassical View 353 7.2.2 Capitalism: The Neoclassical View 355 7.2.3 Poverty: The Neoclassical View 356 7.2.4 Income Distribution: The Marxian View 357 7.2.5 Income Distribution: The Keynesian View 359 7.2.6 Different Explanations of the Returns to Capitalists 360 7.3 Political Consequences of Contending Theories 362 7.3.1 Political Conditions Shape Theories 364 7.3.2 Struggles among Theories and Theorists 365 7.4 Which Theory Do We Choose? 366 7.4.1 Choosing Theories Because of Their Consequences 368 7.4.2 Choosing Theories Based on an Absolute Standard 371 7.4.3 Empiricism 372 7.4.4 Rationalism 373 7.4.5 Choosing Economic Theories and Choosing Epistemologies 374 7.4.6 A Final Thought 377 Notes 379 References 383 Index 387 To Our Readers Our previous and far less ambitious version of this book, Economics: Marxian versus Neoclassical was well-received and quite widely used in colleges and universities since its publication in 1987. That success fl owed, we believe, from that book ’ s two broad goals and the extent of their achievement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Compatibility of Marxian and Keynesian Economics: a Critical Assessment of Two Interpretations of Marx
    NSER 5(1)—Articles The Compatibility of Marxian and Keynesian Economics: A Critical Assessment of Two Interpretations of Marx By Christian Schoder* This paper contrasts two converse interpretations of Marx which are assessed regarding their compatibility with Keynesian concepts of effective demand, independent investment and endogenous money. On the one hand, the orthodox interpretation abstracts from money and assumes the validity of Say's law. Effective demand does not play a role. It is drawn from Marx's treatment of the general law of capitalist accumulation and the law of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall. On the other hand, the monetary interpretation highly regards of demand, investment and money. Money is the trigger of a general glut as it allows for the separation of purchase and sale as a means of circulation. As a means of payment, money implies its endogenous creation through lending. It is laid out in Marx's treatment of the reproduction and circulation of the aggregate social capital, his analysis of money and credit and his rejection of Say's law. * New School for Social Research. 6 East 16 Street, New York, NY 10003 (e-mail: [email protected]). 17 The Compatibility of Marxian and Keynesian Economics 1. Introduction Various methodological, epistemological and theoretical discrepancies among the variety of schools of thought offer pluralism, but impede the emergence of a common research program (cf. Harvey and Garnett 2008). Hence, there have been several endeavors aimed at integrating Marxian and Keynesian approaches by trying to find shared principles and overcome disparities.i This paper seeks to contribute to this integration process of Marxian and Keynesian ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Financial Markets and The
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES FINANCIAL MARKETS AND THE REAL ECONOMY John H. Cochrane Working Paper 11193 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11193 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2005 This review will introduce a volume by the same title in the Edward Elgar series “The International Library of Critical Writings in Financial Economics” edited by Richard Roll. I encourage comments. Please write promptly so I can include your comments in the final version. I gratefully acknowledge research support from the NSF in a grant administered by the NBER and from the CRSP. I thank Monika Piazzesi and Motohiro Yogo for comments. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2005 by John H. Cochrane. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Financial Markets and the Real Economy John H. Cochrane NBER Working Paper No. 11193 March 2005, Revised September 2006 JEL No. G1, E3 ABSTRACT I survey work on the intersection between macroeconomics and finance. The challenge is to find the right measure of "bad times," rises in the marginal value of wealth, so that we can understand high average returns or low prices as compensation for assets' tendency to pay off poorly in "bad times." I survey the literature, covering the time-series and cross-sectional facts, the equity premium, consumption-based models, general equilibrium models, and labor income/idiosyncratic risk approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangers of Deflation Douglas H
    ERD POLICY BRIEF SERIES Economics and Research Department Number 12 Dangers of Deflation Douglas H. Brooks Pilipinas F. Quising Asian Development Bank http://www.adb.org Asian Development Bank P.O. Box 789 0980 Manila Philippines 2002 by Asian Development Bank December 2002 ISSN 1655-5260 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank. The ERD Policy Brief Series is based on papers or notes prepared by ADB staff and their resource persons. The series is designed to provide concise nontechnical accounts of policy issues of topical interest to ADB management, Board of Directors, and staff. Though prepared primarily for internal readership within the ADB, the series may be accessed by interested external readers. Feedback is welcome via e-mail ([email protected]). ERD POLICY BRIEF NO. 12 Dangers of Deflation Douglas H. Brooks and Pilipinas F. Quising December 2002 ecently, there has been growing concern about deflation in some Rcountries and the possibility of deflation at the global level. Aggregate demand, output, and employment could stagnate or decline, particularly where debt levels are already high. Standard economic policy stimuli could become less effective, while few policymakers have experience in preventing or halting deflation with alternative means. Causes and Consequences of Deflation Deflation refers to a fall in prices, leading to a negative change in the price index over a sustained period. The fall in prices can result from improvements in productivity, advances in technology, changes in the policy environment (e.g., deregulation), a drop in prices of major inputs (e.g., oil), excess capacity, or weak demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper No. 39, Neoliberalism As a Variant of Capitalism
    Portland State University PDXScholar Working Papers in Economics Economics 12-12-2019 Working Paper No. 39, Neoliberalism as a Variant of Capitalism Justin Pilarski Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/econ_workingpapers Part of the Economic History Commons, and the Economic Theory Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Pilarski, Justin "Neoliberalism as a Variant of Capitalism, Working Paper No. 39", Portland State University Economics Working Papers. 39. (12 December 2019) i + 14 pages. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Working Papers in Economics by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Neoliberalism as a Variant of Capitalism Working Paper No. 39 Authored by: Justin Pilarski A Contribution to the Working Papers of the Department of Economics, Portland State University Submitted for: EC445 “Comparative Economic Systems” 12 December 2019; i + 14 pages Prepared for Professor John Hall Abstract: Economic systems evolve over time in adapting to the needs and deficiency of the system. This inquiry seeks to establish Neoliberalism as—in the language of Barry Clark—a variant of capitalism that evolved out of retaliation of the regulated variant of capitalism. We utilize Barry Clark’s work on the evolution of economic systems in establishing the pattern of adaptation in American capitalism. Then we establish and analyze the neoliberal variant of capitalism in how this evolution retaliated against the existing system rather than adapting the preceding variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrent Hyperinflations and Learning
    Recurrent Hyperin‡ations and Learning Albert Marcet Universitat Pompeu Fabra and CEMFI Juan Pablo Nicolini Universidad Torcuato Di Tella and Universitat Pompeu Fabra Working Paper No. 9721 December 1997 We thank Tony Braun, Jim Bullard, George Evans, Seppo Honkapohja, Rodi Manuelli, Ramon Marimon, Tom Sargent, Harald Uhlig, Neil Wallace and Car- los Zarazaga for helpful conversations and Marcelo Delajara and Ignacio Ponce Ocampo for research assistance. All errors are our own. Part of this work was done when both authors were visiting the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Research support from DGICYT, CIRIT and HCM is greatly appreciated. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected]. CEMFI, Casado del Alisal 5, 28014 Madrid, Spain. Tel: 341 4290551, fax: 341 4291056, http://www.cem….es. Abstract This paper uses a model of boundedly rational learning to account for the observations of recurrent hyperin‡ations in the last decade. We study a standard monetary model where the fully rational expectations assumption is replaced by a formal de…nition of quasi-rational learning. The model under learning is able to match remarkably well some crucial stylized facts observed during the recurrent hyperin‡ations experienced by several countries in the 80’s. We argue that, despite being a small departure from rational expec- tations, quasi-rational learning does not preclude falsi…ability of the model and it does not violate reasonable rationality requirements. Keywords: Hyperin‡ations, convertibility, stabilization plans, quasi-rationality. JEL classi…cation: D83, E17, E31. 1 Introduction The goal of this paper is to develop a model that accounts for the main fea- tures of the hyperin°ations of last decade and to study the policy recomen- dations that arise from it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oppressive Pressures of Globalization and Neoliberalism on Mexican Maquiladora Garment Workers
    Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 7 July 2019 The Oppressive Pressures of Globalization and Neoliberalism on Mexican Maquiladora Garment Workers Jenna Demeter The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Economic History Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Growth and Development Commons, Income Distribution Commons, Industrial Organization Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, International and Comparative Labor Relations Commons, International Economics Commons, International Relations Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Macroeconomics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Public Economics Commons, Regional Economics Commons, Rural Sociology Commons, Unions Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Demeter, Jenna (2019) "The Oppressive Pressures of Globalization and Neoliberalism on Mexican Maquiladora Garment Workers," Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit/vol9/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by
    [Show full text]
  • Econ 8747: Industrial Organization Theory Fall 2018
    Econ 8747: Industrial Organization Theory Fall 2018 Professor Yongmin Chen Office: Econ 112 Class Time/Location: 9:30-10:45 AM. TTH; ECON 5 Office Hours: 3:30-5:00pm, TTH; 10:00-11:30am, Wednesday Course Description: Industrial organization studies the behavior of firms and markets under imperfect competition. The course will cover selected topics in industrial organization theory. Recommended textbooks include: (1) The Theory of Industrial Organization by Jean Tirole, MIT Press, and (2) Industrial Organization: Contemporary Theory and Practice by Pepall, Richards, and Norman. A good source for references is the Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, 2, and 3. HIO3 (2007, Mark Armstrong and Robert Porter edits) surveys the major developments in IO since Tirole. Grading: Grades are based on homework and class participation (30%), presentation (30%), and a term paper (40%). You are encouraged to form study groups to discuss homework and lecture materials. Requirements for the term paper will be discussed later. The course materials are arranged by topics (the topics are listed below), and each topic is usually covered in several classes. Tirole remains the classic graduate IO textbook, and you are encouraged to read the entire book and work out the exercise problems there (even though we only cover a few parts of the book in the course). You will also be asked to write short reviews/discussions (each review/discussion is 2-3 pages long, double spaced). A tentative course schedule is attached. There can be changes to this schedule during the semester, which will be announced in class. You are responsible for updating course information according to announcements made in class.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman 1) Suppose the Fed
    Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman 1) Suppose the Fed reduces the money supply by 5 percent. a) What happens to the aggregate demand curve? If the Fed reduces the money supply, the aggregate demand curve shifts down. This result is based on the quantity equation MV = PY, which tells us that a decrease in money M leads to a proportionate decrease in nominal output PY (assuming of course that velocity V is fixed). For any given price level P, the level of output Y is lower, and for any given Y, P is lower. b) What happens to the level of output and the price level in the short run and in the long run? In the short run, we assume that the price level is fixed and that the aggregate supply curve is flat. In the short run, output falls but the price level doesn’t change. In the long-run, prices are flexible, and as prices fall over time, the economy returns to full employment. If we assume that velocity is constant, we can quantify the effect of the 5% reduction in the money supply. Recall from Chapter 4 that we can express the quantity equation in terms of percent changes: ΔM/M + ΔV/V = ΔP/P + ΔY/Y We know that in the short run, the price level is fixed. This implies that the percentage change in prices is zero and thus ΔM/M = ΔY/Y. Thus in the short run a 5 percent reduction in the money supply leads to a 5 percent reduction in output.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ontology of Money and Other Economic Phenomena. Dan
    Economic Reality: The Ontology of Money and Other Economic Phenomena. Dan Fitzpatrick PhD Thesis Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method London School of Economics. 1 UMI Number: U198904 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U198904 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TH f , s*’- ^ h %U.Oi+. <9 Librw<V Brittsn utxwy Oi HouUco. J and Eoonowc Science m >Tiir I Abstract The contemporary academic disciplines of Philosophy and Economics by and large do not concern themselves with questions pertaining to the ontology of economic reality; by economic reality I mean the kinds of economic phenomena that people encounter on a daily basis, the central ones being economic transactions, money, prices, goods and services. Economic phenomena also include other aspects of economic reality such as economic agents, (including corporations, individual producers and consumers), commodity markets, banks, investments, jobs and production. My investigation of the ontology of economic phenomena begins with a critical examination of the accounts of theorists and philosophers from the past, including Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Marx, Simmel and Menger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market Structure of Higher Learning
    The Park Place Economist Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 16 5-1996 The Market Structure of Higher Learning Brett Roush '97 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace Recommended Citation Roush '97, Brett (1996) "The Market Structure of Higher Learning," The Park Place Economist: Vol. 4 Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/parkplace/vol4/iss1/16 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. The Market Structure of Higher Learning Abstract A student embarking on a college search is astounded at the number of higher learning institutions available -- an initial response may be to consider their market structure as one of perfect competition. Upon fkrther consideration, though, one sees this is inaccurate. In fact, the market structure of higher learning incorporates elements of monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. An institution may not explicitly be a profit maximizer. However, treating it as such allows predictions of actions to be made by applying the above three market structures.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Rational Expectations Revolution Has Enriched
    How the Rational Expectations Revolution Has Changed Macroeconomic Policy Research by John B. Taylor STANFORD UNIVERSITY Revised Draft: February 29, 2000 Written versions of lecture presented at the 12th World Congress of the International Economic Association, Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 24, 1999. I am grateful to Jacques Dreze for helpful comments on an earlier draft. The rational expectations hypothesis is by far the most common expectations assumption used in macroeconomic research today. This hypothesis, which simply states that people's expectations are the same as the forecasts of the model being used to describe those people, was first put forth and used in models of competitive product markets by John Muth in the 1960s. But it was not until the early 1970s that Robert Lucas (1972, 1976) incorporated the rational expectations assumption into macroeconomics and showed how to make it operational mathematically. The “rational expectations revolution” is now as old as the Keynesian revolution was when Robert Lucas first brought rational expectations to macroeconomics. This rational expectations revolution has led to many different schools of macroeconomic research. The new classical economics school, the real business cycle school, the new Keynesian economics school, the new political macroeconomics school, and more recently the new neoclassical synthesis (Goodfriend and King (1997)) can all be traced to the introduction of rational expectations into macroeconomics in the early 1970s (see the discussion by Snowden and Vane (1999), pp. 30-50). In this lecture, which is part of the theme on "The Current State of Macroeconomics" at the 12th World Congress of the International Economic Association, I address a question that I am frequently asked by students and by "non-macroeconomist" colleagues, and that I suspect may be on many people's minds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socialization of Investment, from Keynes to Minsky and Beyond
    Working Paper No. 822 The Socialization of Investment, from Keynes to Minsky and Beyond by Riccardo Bellofiore* University of Bergamo December 2014 * [email protected] This paper was prepared for the project “Financing Innovation: An Application of a Keynes-Schumpeter- Minsky Synthesis,” funded in part by the Institute for New Economic Thinking, INET grant no. IN012-00036, administered through the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Co-principal investigators: Mariana Mazzucato (Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex) and L. Randall Wray (Levy Institute). The author thanks INET and the Levy Institute for support of this research. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2014 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X Abstract An understanding of, and an intervention into, the present capitalist reality requires that we put together the insights of Karl Marx on labor, as well as those of Hyman Minsky on finance. The best way to do this is within a longer-term perspective, looking at the different stages through which capitalism evolves.
    [Show full text]