Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman

1) Suppose the Fed reduces the by 5 percent.

a) What happens to the aggregate curve?

If the Fed reduces the , the aggregate shifts down. This result is based on the quantity equation MV = PY, which tells us that a decrease in money M leads to a proportionate decrease in nominal PY (assuming of course that velocity V is fixed). For any given level P, the level of output Y is lower, and for any given Y, P is lower.

b) What happens to the level of output and the in the short run and in the long run?

In the short run, we assume that the price level is fixed and that the curve is flat. In the short run, output falls but the price level doesn’t change. In the long-run, are flexible, and as prices fall over time, the returns to full employment.

If we assume that velocity is constant, we can quantify the effect of the 5% reduction in the money supply. Recall from Chapter 4 that we can express the quantity equation in terms of percent changes:

ΔM/M + ΔV/V = ΔP/P + ΔY/Y

We know that in the short run, the price level is fixed. This implies that the percentage change in prices is zero and thus ΔM/M = ΔY/Y. Thus in the short run a 5 percent reduction in the money supply leads to a 5 percent reduction in output.

In the long-run we know that prices are flexible and the economy returns to its natural rate of output. This implies that in the long-run, the percentage change in output is zero and thus ΔM/M = ΔP/P. Thus in the long run a 5 percent reduction in the money supply leads to a 5 percent reduction in the price level.

c) According to Okun’s law, what happens to in the short run and in the long run?

Okun’s law refers to the negative relationship that exists between unemployment and real GDP. Okun’s law can be summarized by the equation:

ΔY/Y = 3.5% - 2*(Δ in unemployment)

Page 1 of 6 Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman

That is, output moves in the opposite direction from unemployment, with a ratio of 2 to 1. In the short run, when output falls, unemployment rises. Quantitatively, if velocity is constant, we found that output falls 5% (relative to full employment) in the short run, so unemployment increases 2.5%. In the long run, both output and unemployment return to their natural levels, so there is no long-term change in unemployment.

d) What happens to the real rate in the short run and in the long run?

The national income accounts identity tells us that S = Y – C – G. Thus, when Y falls, S falls (assuming that MPC is less than one). This will cause the real to rise (see Figure 3-9 for what this would look like). When Y returns to its original long-run level, so does the real interest rate.

2) Let’s examine how the goals of the Fed influence its response to shocks. Suppose Fed A cares only about keeping the price level stable, and Fed B cares only about keeping output and employment at their natural levels. Explain how each Fed would respond to

a) An exogenous decrease in the .

An exogenous decrease in the velocity of money causes the curve to shift downward. In the short run, prices are fixed, so output falls.

If the Fed wants to keep output and employment at their natural-rate levels, it must increase aggregate demand to offset the decrease in velocity. By increasing the money supply, the Fed can shift the aggregate demand curve upward, restoring the economy to its original equilibrium point. Both the price level and output would remain constant.

If the Fed wants to keep prices stable, then it wants to avoid the long-run adjustment to a lower price level. Therefore, it should do precisely what Fed B does, and increase the money supply to shift the aggregate demand curve upward, again restoring the original equilibrium point.

b) An exogenous increase in the price of oil.

An exogenous increase in the price of oil is an adverse that causes the short-run aggregate supply curve to shift upward.

If the Fed cares about keeping output and employment at their natural-rate levels, then it should increase aggregate demand by increasing the money supply. This

Page 2 of 6 Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman policy response shifts the aggregate demand curve rightward. In this case, the economy immediately reaches a new equilibrium – the price level is permanently higher, but there is no loss in output associated with the adverse supply shock.

If the Fed cares about keeping prices stable, then there is no policy response it can implement. In the short run, the price level stays at the higher level. The Fed must simply wait, holding aggregate demand constant. Eventually, prices fall to restore full employment at the old price level. But the cost of this process is a prolonged .

3) Totally differentiate the quantity equation of money to derive the slope of the aggregate demand curve (obviously this requires calculus – I’m not saying a question like this would ever show up on your exam. I just think it’s cool.).

The quantity equation is given by MV = PY. Totally differentiating this gives us

M*dV + V*dM = P*dY + Y*dP.

Along a stationary aggregate demand curve, dV = dM = 0, so Y*dP = -P*dY, or dP/dY = -P/Y. Note that this is precisely the slope of the demand curve (the change in price for a slight change in output), which is of course negative.

4) Almost all agree that and prices are flexible in the long run and that real GDP moves toward its natural level. The speed with which this occurs, however, is a subject of considerable debate. Some economists believe that sticky wages and prices make the movement back to the natural level a long, protracted process, while others believe that wages and prices are sufficiently flexible to move the economy rapidly to its natural level.

What do you suppose economists who believe that the natural level is achieved very slowly think about the importance of stabilization policies? Why? What do you suppose economists who believe that the natural level is achieved rapidly think about stabilization policies? Why?

Those economists who believe that sticky wages and prices make the movement to the natural level a long drawn-out process generally believe that stabilization policies have an important role to play so that the economy need not languish for long periods of time below full employment. Those economists who believe that prices and wages are sufficiently flexible to move the economy to its natural level rapidly are less enthusiastic about the use of stabilization policy for several reasons: the policy effects and their timing are often unpredictable, policymakers may not act in the best

Page 3 of 6 Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman interest of then economy, and the public’s expectations of policy changes may mitigate their efficacy.

5) Suppose velocity is stable. What specific things would the Federal Reserve need to know in order to keep output at its natural level following a supply shock?

If velocity is stable, the Federal Reserve can easily ascertain the shape and position of the aggregate demand curve. Once the Fed located the position of the current short-run aggregate supply curve (by knowing what the current price level is), it could implement the appropriate policy change to shift the aggregate demand curve and keep output stable. Of course this also means that the Fed would also need to know where the long-run aggregate supply curve was (that is, the level of output that the economy can CONSISTENTLY produce without or ).

Suppose instead that velocity is unstable and unpredictable. How would this complicate the Federal Reserve’s ability to stabilize the economy following a supply shock?

If velocity is unstable and unpredictable, it will be difficult for the Federal Reserve to ascertain the exact shape and position of the aggregate demand curve. Consequently, it would be difficult to determine the required change in the money supply even if the short-run and long-run aggregate supply curves can be located precisely.

Page 4 of 6 Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman

6) Consider the impact of an increase in thriftiness in the . Suppose the function is C = a + c(Y – T), where a is a parameter called and c is the marginal propensity to consume.

a. What happens to equilibrium income when the society becomes more thrifty, as represented by a decline in a? By how much does it change?

If society becomes more thrifty—meaning that for any given level of income people save more and consume less—then the planned-expenditure function shifts down ward, (note that C2 < C1). Equilibrium income falls from Y1 to Y2.

Planned Expenditures (PE)

Y = PE

PE1 (C1)

PE2 (C2)

Y2 Y1 Y

b. What happens to equilibrium saving? Why do you suppose this result is called the ?

Equilibrium saving remains unchanged. The identity tells us that saving equals , or S = I. In the Keynesian-cross model, we assumed that desired investment is fixed. This assumption implies that investment is the same in the new equilibrium as it was in the old. We can conclude that saving is exactly the same in both equilibria.

The paradox of thrift is that even though thriftiness increases, saving is unaffected. Increased thriftiness leads only to a fall in income. For an individual, we usually consider thriftiness a virtue. From the perspective of the entire economy as represented by the Keynesian-cross model, however, thriftiness is a vice.

Page 5 of 6 Problem Set 7 – Some Answers FE312 Fall 2010 Rahman

c. Does this paradox arise in the classical model of Chapter 3? Why or why not?

In the classical model of Chapter 3, the paradox of thrift does not arise. In that model, output is fixed by the factors of production and the production technology, and the interest rate adjusts to equilibrate saving and investment, where investment depends on the interest rate. An increase in thriftiness decreases consumption and increases saving for any level of output; since output is fixed, the saving schedule shifts to the right. At the new equilibrium, the interest rate is lower, and investment and saving are higher.

7) a. Suppose that there is a sudden increase in the – that is, at the same levels of r and Y people want to hold more money. What would happen to the money demand curve and the LM curve? Illustrate graphically.

The money demand curve would shift to the right. Notice that this implies a higher interest rate. The LM curve would shift to the left. Notice that this also implies a higher interest rate; it also means less economic output – think of the reasons why.

b. Suppose that Congress decides to reduce the budget deficit by cutting spending. What would happen to the Keynesian Cross and the IS curve? Illustrate graphically.

The planned expenditure curve would shift down. The IS curve would shift left. Think of the reasons why.

8) How would each of the following changes affect the shape of the IS curve?

a. the MPC gets bigger.

It gets flatter. Use the Keynesian Cross to see why.

b. investment becomes more sensitive to changes in the interest rate.

It gets flatter.

Page 6 of 6