Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20(2): 189-206 DOI: 10.31456/beytulmakdis.777767

WAS A WESTERN PROJECT IN ?

Ibrahim KARATAŞ*

ABSTRACT: This study aims to ascertain the extent to which it was Western powers or Zionists that founded Israel. The study argues that Israel was established by Western powers, while not ignoring the partial but significant role of Zionists that sought for a Jewish homeland. The West needed a Jewish homeland in order to utilise Jewish wealth, while also keeping away since they were disturbed by the presence of the Jewish community. On the other hand, the World Zionist Organisation, motivated by anti-Semitism and , pioneered the idea of a Jewish and tried to persuade Western leaders as to the viability of a homeland in Palestine. While Zionist lobbying was influential, it can hardly be argued that they would have founded Israel without the help and permission of Western states, and in particular, the . The study aims to reveal external roles in nation-building by analysing the case of Israel. Methodologically, both quantitative and qualitative researches were used.

KEYWORDS: Israel, , Mandate System, Palestine, Middle East.

INTRODUCTION The State of Israel was founded in 1948 with UN Resolution 181 that partitioned the Mandate of Palestine into two states: Palestine and Israel. However, due to several wars fought between neighbouring Arab states and Israel that resulted in the defeat of the former, Israel occupied most of the Palestinian territories, thereby leaving only one single state (Israel) on the former mandate. Unlike other countries, as Israelis themselves accept, Israel does not accept multiculturalism and multi-ethnicity, recognising only as the official religion and Hebrew as the nation’s language. Therefore, it has a religious and ethnical identity rather than a secular one. This identity shapes its domestic and foreign policies. With this in mind, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues through a continuous, low- intensity war due to the rejection of the Palestinian state and the basic rights of Palestinians. When looking at this issue from the Arab side, Israel’s reluctance to withdraw from the occupied lands and non-acceptance of a permanent solution, most probably due to its strength against its adversary, as well as foreign support for the Israeli state, have worsened the conflict and do not give a hope for a likely solution.

* Assistant Professor of International Relations, Istinye University Turkey, [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0002-2125-1840. 190 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) the same, can anation found same, the o coninced ho are others fornation,alongith ne need a of erceied the aareness national Therefore, themseles. for homeland a build to them heled Gentile case, in Israel’s but ethnic group, an by built be nation can and ealth, eish founded. WZO’s main main WZO’s founded. as W the century hen th late until the dreams as remained ishes their et od. by to them romised claimas hich they back to Palestine, returning of and abyloniandreamed years the eile after in diasorafor lied es HOMELAND JEWISH A FOR SUPPORT WESTERN THE made. be ill discussion of the assessment authorial an in Pale states to their found own efforts Jews’ examine will it Second, eole. eish for home a creating in oers of Western role on the first focus ill This study Professor. out Palestinian a ith carried as interie an omitted, e Palestinian the While comared. ere ionistsin literature of efforts the to it attributing those and roect Western a is Israel claiming that literature ith its theory that theory its literature ith the to contribute to eected is study The aid. through in articular, and canno state eish the that noted be should it colonialism, the fruit as een Western if otherIsrael of hand, the n Israel. foundation the of andstate rong alsofacilitated olicies, Palestinian anne the lack of Arab instituti Arab of lack the to do so. oreoer, them oersnotalloed ritishmire other and the had analys not suff as oer alone economic eish as West, the by founded as Israel that argues for it study Israel, this founding does ionistWhile not efforts ignore Palestine. in homeland for a return in side to their rich es to take attemted they th to maintain finance of in need were belligerents since case, Israel’s In ork. or hard conuncture, common interests, luck, include factor may decisie or the intoroectto being, acome not underestimated. be W should businessmen like the othschilds and and othschilds the like businessmen effortseish of the other hand, the n affirmation. Western notbeen there had Israel called country a be not ould there that indicating of eidence hich is claimed as the iblical the as claimed is hich Palestine, in the state eish a elcomed tates nited the as ell as mire, late through canthe eish tocontrol a create hich state, they aimed that roect Western a as Israel them, ofTo Israel. suort Western in the conflict ast

Ibrahim KARATAŞ

’ th century. ince then, to big colonial oers, rance and the ritish ritish the rance and oers, colonial big to then, ince century. th egarding the method used for riting this article, the ies of those of those ies the article, this for riting used method the egarding any scholars, articularly those of Arab origin, find the root roblem of the of the rootroblem the find origin, Arab of those articularly scholars, any

and its re its and ed belo also suort the ie that ionists could not hae founded Israel Israel founded not hae ionists could that ie the also belo suort ed icient to create a state. What is more, es lacked is more,hard oer. What lacked es create a state. to icient sources. Indeed, lans for founding a eish state go back to the the back to go state eish a founding for lans Indeed, sources. – ionism led to the foundation to Israel. ionismthe of led goal as to found a homeland for the eish eole eole eish for the homeland to a found as goal ons, eak cohesion, oor organis oor cohesion, eak ons, state

home of the es anotti, . There is lenty lenty is There . anotti, es the of home

eish hatred of the West, West, of the hatred eish .

s such the such s t surie ithout Western suort, suort, Western ithout surie t

World ionist rganis ionist World

rsectie as mainly mainly rsectie as ation, attemts to to ation,attemts

In other ords, a a ords, other In –

eloitation of eloitation of stine. inally, stine. hating eshating eir ars, ars, eir ‘ tudies iddle iddle ation ation f founded. WZO’s main main WZO’s founded. as W the century hen th late until the dreams as remained ishes their et od. by to them romised claimas hich they back to Palestine, returning of and abyloniandreamed years the eile after in diasorafor lied es HOMELAND JEWISH A FOR SUPPORT WESTERN THE made. be ill discussion of the assessment authorial an in Pale states to their found own efforts Jews’ examine will it Second, eole. eish for home a creating in oers of Western role on the first focus ill This study Professor. out Palestinian a ith carried as interie an omitted, e Palestinian the While comared. ere ionistsin literature of efforts the to it attributing those and roect Western a is Israel claiming that can anation found same, the o coninced ho are others fornation,alongith ne need a of erceied the aareness national Therefore, themseles. for homeland a build to them heled Gentile case, in Israel’s but ethnic group, an by built be nation can and ealth, eish that theory its literature ith the to contribute to eected is study The aid. through in articular, and canno state eish the that noted be should it colonialism, the fruit as een Western if otherIsrael of hand, the n Israel. foundation the of andstate rong alsofacilitated olicies, Palestinian anne instituti Arab of lack the to do so. oreoer, them oersnotalloed ritishmire other and the had analys not suff as oer alone economic eish as West, the by founded as Israel that argues for it study Israel, this founding does ionistWhile not efforts ignore Palestine. in homeland for a return in side to their rich es to take attemted they th to maintain finance of in need were belligerents since case, Israel’s In ork. or hard conuncture, common interests, luck, include factor may decisie or the intoroectto being, acome not underestimated. be W should and othschilds the like businessmen effortseish of the other hand, the n affirmation. Western notbeen there had Israel called country a be not ould there that indicating of eidence iblical the as claimed is hich Palestine, in the state eish a elcomed tates nited the as ell as mire, late ast through canthe eish tocontrol a create hich state, they aimed that roect Western a as Israel them, ofTo Israel. suort Western in the conflict

’ th century. ince then, to big colonial oers, rance and the ritish ritish the rance and oers, colonial big to then, ince century. th any scholars, articularly those of Arab origin, find the root roblem of the of the rootroblem the find origin, Arab of those articularly scholars, any egarding the method used for riting this article, the ies of those of those ies the article, this for riting used method the egarding

and its re its and ed belo also suort the ie that ionists could not hae founded Israel Israel founded not hae ionists could that ie the also belo suort ed icient to create a state. What is more, es lacked is more,hard oer. What lacked es create a state. to icient sources. Indeed, lans for founding a eish state go back to the the back to go state eish a founding for lans Indeed, sources. – ionism led to the foundation to Israel. ionismthe of led goal as to found a homeland for the eish eole eole eish for the homeland to a found as goal ons, eak cohesion, oor organis oor cohesion, eak ons, state

home of the es anotti, . There is lenty lenty is There . anotti, es the of home

eish hatred of the West, West, of the hatred eish .

s such the such s t surie ithout Western suort, suort, Western ithout surie t

World ionist rganis ionist World

rsectie as mainly mainly rsectie as ation, attemts to to ation,attemts

In other ords, a a ords, other In –

eloitation of eloitation of stine. inally, stine. hating eshating eir ars, ars, eir ‘ tudies iddle iddle ation ation f too a land the claims for same the hae rabs should then to braham, gien lands were if arguingthese that of iblical promise, the iews Jewish countered hae rabs et descendants. his and braham to promised e e region return to to Jews enabling in temple the rebuilding by world, the throughout agents his as of loyalty to obtain the aimed e in . of apoleonrance by time first for the agenda colonial the in included be to seemed Palestine people in bee t the will ie a la lie i the wh theele has it will ie I ie hates the eset the t a ea the eiteaea t ea the e bes O the In support. their gain and Jews to attract central tenets one ofas their promises iblical used butit one, religious a than rather moement nationalist purely a was It world. the oer all spreading was also there to defend the rights of Catholics (Schölch, 1992: 41). The British British The mpire were of 41). 1992: (Schölch, Catholics of rights the defend to there also was rance while minorities, orthodox protecting of excuse the with in Palestine been late as been hae should not l territories Palestinian influence to way fora looed and alarmed were ritish the of this, in iew and side Glatt, . oweer, since apoleon was defeated, his plan his defeated, was apoleon since . oweer, Glatt, in Jerusalem old temple the rebuild to in order flag his under to gather sia and inister enamin israeli wrote that Jews would become a nation in Palestine nation in Palestine a would become Jews that wrote israeli enamin inister return Jews’ for support their announced lords seeral in , again restoration considered reportedly goernment ritish the , in home old Jewish the of restoration the asing memorandum a committea sent Scotland ocally more homeland call Jewish for a to officersbegan colonial and clerics, ournalists, of Jews. wealth the from would benefit State Ottoman the Palestine, to to return encouraged were urope across liing Jews dispersed the if that Sultan the conince to ambassador Ponsonby to ord letter a wrote Palmerston ord inister ritishoreign in , example, for the of‘restoration the Jews’ to l to isits conducting already groupswere become involved in Palestine. The ‘gentile Zionists’ of Britain and some Protestant reason to a find to goernment ritish for the difficult not was it oweer, .

eaing aside the iblical aspect, establishing a national home for Jewish Jewish home for national a establishing iblicalaspect, the aside eaing s, ritish people with arious professions such as politicians, politicians, as such ariousprofessions with ritishpeople s, the In ite iesel ite from ayyali, . fter apoleon sieged cre in , rench newspaper newspaper rench , in cre sieged apoleon fter . ayyali, Schölch, 1992: 1992: Schölch, , ritish mbassador to the Ottoman mpire, in which he ased the the ased he in which mpire, Ottoman to the mbassador ritish , rance

the , ussia and Germany also showed their interest in Palestine, in Palestine, interest their alsoshowed Germany and ussia ,

Protestant faith, whic faith, Protestant

wrote that apoleon onaparte had called all Jews in frica frica in Jews all called had onaparte apoleon that wrote . s Saylor s . e to Palestine to learn to the publish learn of conditionsand to Jews Palestine e Awaisi and Yiğit, 2020: 1; Ediz, 2019: 103). The British British The 103). 2019: Ediz, 1; 2020: Yiğit, and Awaisi Palestine ” as it was in responding because ussia had already already ussiahad in respondingbecause was it as

xod

initiate ld estament, it is stated that that stated is it estament, ld us, . hus, as per the erse, the land is is land the erse, the per as hus, . us,

and to pose a threat to the ritish in the in the ritish to the threat a to pose and

h was almost non almost h was a under Ottoman rule. or or rule. under Ottoman state Jewish a to Palestine and in , ritish Prime Prime ritish in , and Palestine to essuring the goernment goernment the essuring and uds pr lists in , the hurchthe in , of lists

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? s they are Abraham’s sons Abraham’s are they s existent in Palestine. in Palestine. existent was not was Jews, use Jews “I will establish will“I establish

realised , .

191 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 192 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) emhass ts ts reort sbmtte n to rtsh rme nster r r nster rme rtsh to n reortsbmtte ambe estern sort or a esh naton heoor er mentons n hsboosort naton oreresh heoor a mentons estern rotestant state or aesh ra rom athas nee state esh ora obbe that onsts hrstan ere there aton n aestne ben as es o home ba the reera to they that s homean esh a abot es ther rearn Amerans rtsh an rtabrary esh es to o aestne ba or n the ae brearats to Ameran s n ate es oressn bean ssans hen n aestne home natona esh or a sorths o neenent an eaas o rebn n the beee he that state ohn Aams Ameran resent s aestne nenta n t eenta hs athe that he sbmtte a reest or a sbmtte he that oere a m oere a hamberan eretary oona rtsh the er aease o er the by rese rtsh oernment Arsh the hhbt ne an as mrants oresh reon toatonomos an reate rshas an e the are by onsore Arentna oraestne aternate another aso mentons er roosa ony on the ose aestne an reete o other members ad Ali’s ambitions ( Ali’s ambitions hamm ad ontroe ths ths ontroe ontry another that aare e ere they bease rtsh or the ea more nenta n more nenta an hher beame sort anea ess o omn the or rereste atherna s o the n srae es that beee aneas sensatonast n Ameran n omsory as ebre o sty the aton n estament nene the by thereore more ere an ebre orna n the be aestne ooe obe onon mes east at na an onon rotethe beteen shortenn n eana trae to ontro as e as na oatonto ts rotet n strate as mortanty more to raan ateay a beran to a yt as aestne A ty o hoy n the onsate a oene an oortnty reos trne oernment rtsh the nterests eonom an o strate ts rotet years ty thn rtshane ner the Ibrahim KARATAŞ er nehbors erstes nn arar or a on tme ynho hat s more more s hat or ynho onarar atme nn erstes he ate th entry an eary th entry sa the sa entry th eary an entry th ate he eary nthe entry th nthe state aesh or aso sort as here e that a esh esh a that e

annerman eort oeny ase or a esh state n aestne he n aestne state esh ora ase oeny eort annerman sne t thoht the atter o aso be a barrer to the ytan r ytan to barrer othe a asobe atter thohtsne t the mst be estabshe n aestne ar n aestne estabshe be mst saitaie oeer the an as notreas as an the oeer the orse o tme an shae oren oy on srae on oy oren shae o an tme orse the

area n ana or a esh oony oe oony esh or a ana n area

ber state hh s reny to roe an hoste to to hoste an to roe reny s hh state ber Schölch, 1992: 45). A Jewish homeland was a good good a was homeland Jewish A 45). 1992: Schölch, ntry n aton Abraham non aso eare asoeare non Abraham aton n ntry the oons the t o t the rtsh onneton th na na th onneton rtsh the t o t y oe yt n an beame more more beame an n yt oe y aoraby at on o yrs an the naennsa the an o on yrs hat s ommon or the renh renh or the ommon s hat on the ea o oatn es to o oatn ea to on es the rts an e nreort a e ae n an Aan Aan an n enry ambe b ase emans nto an nto an emans ase s n yamson yamson n s the sort stemmn stemmn sort the Amerans rea the the rea Amerans

rystas er er an er an er annerman annerman aton o o aton n

er er ts ts emhass r nster rme rtsh to n reortsbmtte ambe mrants oresh reon toatonomos an reate rshas an e the are by onsore Arentna oraestne aternate another aso mentons er roosa ony on the ose aestne an reete o other members m oere a hamberan eretary oona rtsh the er aease o er the by rese rtsh oernment Arsh the hhbt ne an as reest or a sbmtte he that n hsboosort naton oreresh heoor a mentons estern n more nenta an hher beame sort anea ess o omn the or rereste atherna s o the n srae es that beee aneas sensatonast n Ameran n omsory as ebre o sty the aton n estament nene the by thereore more ere an ebre orna n the be rotestant state or aesh ra rom athas nee state esh ora obbe that onsts hrstan ere there aton n aestne ben as es o home ba the reera to they that s homean esh a abot es ther rearn Amerans rtsh an rtabrary esh es to o aestne ba or n the ae brearats to Ameran s n ate es oressn bean ssans hen n aestne home natona esh or a sorths o neenent an eaas o rebn n the beee he that state ohn Aams Ameran resent s aestne nenta n t eenta hs athe ths ontroe ontry another that aare e ere they bease rtsh or the ea hamm aestne ooe obe onon mes east at na an onon rotethe beteen shortenn n eana trae to ontro as e as na oatonto ts rotet n strate as mortanty more to raan ateay a beran to a yt as aestne A ty o hoy n the onsate a oene an oortnty reos trne oernment rtsh the nterests eonom an o strate ts rotet years ty thn rtshane ner the er nehbors erstes nn arar or a on tme ynho hat s more more s hat or ynho onarar atme nn erstes he ate th entry an eary th entry sa the sa entry th eary an entry th ate he eary nthe entry th nthe state aesh or aso sort as here e that a esh esh a that e ad Ali’s ambitions ( Ali’s ambitions ad

annerman eort oeny ase or a esh state n aestne he n aestne state esh ora ase oeny eort annerman sne t thoht the atter o aso be a barrer to the ytan r ytan to barrer othe a asobe atter thohtsne t the mst be estabshe n aestne ar n aestne estabshe be mst saitaie oeer the an as notreas as an the oeer the orse o tme an shae oren oy on srae on oy oren shae o an tme orse the

area n ana or a esh oony oe oony esh or a ana n area

ber state hh s reny to roe an hoste to to hoste an to roe reny s hh state ber Schölch, 1992: 45). A Jewish homeland was a good good a was homeland Jewish A 45). 1992: Schölch, ntry n aton Abraham non aso eare asoeare non Abraham aton n ntry the oons the t o t the rtsh onneton th na na th onneton rtsh the t o t y oe yt n an beame more more beame an n yt oe y aoraby at on o yrs an the naennsa the an o on yrs hat s ommon or the renh renh or the ommon s hat

on the ea o oatn es to o oatn ea to on es the rts an e nreort a e ae n an Aan Aan an n enry ambe b ase emans nto an nto an emans ase s n yamson yamson n s the sort stemmn stemmn sort the Amerans rea the the rea Amerans

rystas er er an er an er annerman annerman aton o o aton n

er er wee mainl goened b the local it bthe goened mainl wee sel the had Jews aa Jewish o establishment the enabling wee the that the Jewish Jewish the o establishment the sece shall andato thatstate cleal the andate the ‘self mentioned mentioned om sel alestinians to the eclde and homeland Jewish a ceate to itishgoenment the b witten delibeatel was o alestine andate the 2) ages, (2: halidi as oeoe, oi ased btalso declaation the acceted onl not Jaan) and tal, ance, (itain, a o old owes allied 15). he 2: (et, owes allied b endosed emo oneence, one eace 2). 211: (ece, obligation intenational an state Jewish a o econstitting the maing and eclaation owescan be geat of Further support declaration in 1917. the endorsed also administration Wilson’s esident S oeoe, 2). 2: (aos, mie itish to the adantage addi with the Palestinian as they were fighting against us” against fighting were they as Arabs Palestinian the with that late saing b alestinians the with dislease his also conessed eoge, lod iniste, ime he sccess. ist geat i as ha was the Jews, o inl lage a case wold eclaation alo the Aabs that hile eaed alestinians. the teo o mention the can be seen, thee was was thee seen, can be endeavours necessary methods an methods necessary ational Home of the ewish Peole ewish the of Home ational tha rincile the accets Government them with a nation a with them 24). 21: (leeland, on abot ionist welcomed asiations the geste, a As in wa. ossia owesand to ee Jews o entente ssian the on side wa the into the shS inAmeica the to elites Jewish itish contacted the b Alamed administation. Ameican the to inlence Jews Ameican with contact alsoin ssians wee and owe. emans iscal thei se to Jews o sot the to gain attemting ssiawee and eman that itishsaw the a, old ist ingthe tion, hchill stated in one o his seeches that a Jewish state wold be an wold an be state Jewish a that seeches his one o in stated tion,hchill esides this, a this, esides entall, the itish too Jews to thei side and icl began to awad to awad began icl and to side thei Jews itishtoo the entall, determination’ used in relation to them. Conversely, Article two and six of of six and two Article Conversely, to them. relation in used determination’ ational ome ational

no ence, endosed b all signatoies, as well well o San as as tems the signatoies, in all the b ence,endosed to secure the achievement of this objective and will discuss the the will discuss and objective this of achievement the secure to w hee goening instittions that a omal state had, the alestinians had, omala state that goeninginstittions ‘ state ia the alo eclaation, which eads eads which alo eclaation, the ia state national home national

in the aticles o the andate as a eole, no is the tem tem a as the is no eole, andate the o aticles in the seen in the eage o ations endosement o the alo o alo othe endosement ations eage the in seen d means with the ionist rganis the ionist with means d ts imlementation (ai, Steine and ohen, 215). 215). ohen, and Steine (adai, imlementation ts

a omise to the ionist ganis ionist to the omise a

(ain, 2 (ain,

lobbing eots o the othe belligeents, the the oothelobbing belligeents, eots the

11). actices o the itish les also indicate indicate also les o itish the 11).actices o Jews is mentioned in the tems o the ais ais the o tems in the mentioned is o Jews detemination. detemination. – t Palestine should be reconstituted as the the as be reconstituted should Palestine t ish athoit. ish athoit.

His Majesty’s Government will use its best best its use will Government Majesty’s His ding a Jewish homeland in alestine in alestine homeland Jewish a ding

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine?

ndeed, the alestinians ae alestinians the ndeed, “We could not get in touch in not touch get “We could ati ation o a state while no no while state o a ation on state instittions. hile instittions. hile state ”

(e, 21: 195). n n (e, 195). 21:

(Köse, 2018: 55). As 55). 2018: (Köse, “1 –

His Majesty’s Majesty’s His t was thei thei was t

193 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 194 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) reconi name ‘dual suchas colit terms different name who scholars, sraeli many from (200:12) uote Kedar and Forman scholars. in198. alestine fiures hese fee. nominal a with them to dunams 220,000 and dunams sold 00,000 local ranted the ritish authority to dunamsews, 25,000 sold eanese) (mainly outside alestine landlordsfrom feudal while ear period. andate the Aras durin alestinian that the Israeli State could not have survived without Truman’s support in its first first its in support Truman’s without survived have could not State Israeli the that arue of ome srael. even authors decisive role independence the for the played mi the welcomed had Congress the and Truman President 1947,and in late Partition“The Plan” supported had administration the independence, efore one year support, sr the while of land, would the tae time, maority that a at who were alestinians, the decision, per the As ewish. other the and Ara one states: into two alestine of partition the for 181 esolution accepted Assemly eneral the inspired was of the decision partition the overnment, the y reected was Commission the of offer the Althouh 1). 2010: (ayamey, efforts leitimi further of alestine, partition Commissiont eel the formed ritishovernment the example, For 502). 200: Kedar, and Forman (in alestinians poor aainst uildin followed y the oviet nion and other countries. other and oviet nion ythe followed 15, in ay ritis he population. were notof ewish lands predominantly a iven the ut immiration waves, new asor it let to was srael to land more ivin reason for he 5. remainin the Al (2008) Fischach to rose amount the period, andate the of einnin the at land 2of owned ews althouh Conseuently, 1980). ations, (nited ionists (2020: aleh alestinians, from lands ouht ews that claim ionists While areas). Mawat to uy ews allowed ritishmandate the addition, n 1957). times numer total (adavi, until ten almost ofthe 198 increased ews mandate, mi ewish 7,00 While state. sraeli independent an toward to moretae them steps assisted and land

Ibrahim KARATAŞ 7) imawi asserts, the ritish were not mediatin, ut helpin ews for nation ews helpin ut mediatin, not were ritish the asserts, imawi he ritish policy is seen as seen is ritish policy he While the is the first first the is the While n furtherin the aim of self of aim the furtherin n stresses aeli state of ews, who were a small minority at that time, would possess possess would time, that at minority small a were who ews, of state aeli

s (an ttoman term mea term (an ttoman , but a United Nations report prepared in 1980 confirms Saleh’s claims claims Saleh’s confirms in 1980 prepared report Nations United a but , in country is the oviet nion (Kramer, 2017: ). eardin American American ).2017: eardin (Kramer, nion oviet country is the in allocation and and allocation 198. he nited tates reconis tates henited 198.

that only less than 1 of alestinian lands were ouht from from ouht were lands alestinian of 1 than only less that ration of more ews (Al arhan, 2017: 2). t was ruman that ruman that 2). was t 2017: arhan, more(Al of ews ration

rants came to alestine from urope in the first ten years of the of the years first ten the in fromurope to alestine came rants conversely h left alestine, and sraeli leaders declared independence, independence, declared leaders sraeli and alestine, left h purchasin strenthened the position of ews and and ews of position the strenthened purchasin

nin uncultivated wasteland far from populated populated far from wasteland uncultivated nin claims that ewish companies owned 20 of 20 owned companies ewish claims that de facto de facto overnance, allowin new waves of miration of miration waves new allowin overnance, a facilitation of ewish colonis facilitationofa ewish s in the ewish state thans to ionist loy loy to ionist thans state ewish the in onialism’ and ‘non and onialism’ reconis ed srael minutes after proclamation, proclamation, after minutes srael ed

er of srael, the fir the srael, of er din the rest of the lands, lands, of rest the the din hat finally proposed the the proposed finally hat formal colonialism’. As colonialism’. formal miri may e contested contested e may around

(state lands) andlands) (state ation y many ation many y

y it. n 197, 197, n it. y in 197. in 197. st de jure y that the Israeli State could not have survived without Truman’s support in its first first its in support Truman’s without survived have could not State Israeli the that arue of ome srael. even authors decisive role independence the for the played mi the welcomed had Congress the and Truman President and 1947, in late Partition“The Plan” supported had administration the independence, efore one year support, reconi countries. other and oviet nion ythe followed 15, in ay ritis he population. were notof ewish lands predominantly a iven the ut immiration waves, new asor it let to was srael to land more ivin reason for he 5. remainin the sr the while of land, would the tae time, maority that a at who were alestinians, the decision, per the As ewish. other the and Ara one states: into two alestine of partition the for 181 esolution accepted Assemly eneral the inspired was of the decision partition the overnment, the y reected was Commission the of offer the Althouh 1). 2010: (ayamey, efforts leitimi further of alestine, partition Commissiont eel the formed ritishovernment the example, For 502). 200: Kedar, and Forman (in alestinians poor aainst uildin Al ‘dual suchas colit terms different name who scholars, sraeli many from (200:12) uote Kedar and Forman scholars. in198. alestine (2008) Fischach to rose amount the period, andate the of einnin the at land 2of owned ews althouh Conseuently, 1980). ations, (nited ionists fiures hese fee. nominal a with them to dunams 220,000 and dunams sold 00,000 local ranted the ritish authority to dunamsews, 25,000 sold eanese) (mainly outside alestine landlordsfrom feudal while ear period. andate the Aras durin alestinian (2020: aleh alestinians, from lands ouht ews that claim ionists While areas). Mawat to uy ews allowed ritishmandate the addition, n 1957). times numer total (adavi, until ten almost ofthe 198 increased ews mandate, mi ewish 7,00 While state. sraeli independent an toward to moretae them steps assisted and land 7) imawi asserts, the ritish were not mediatin, ut helpin ews for nation ews helpin ut mediatin, not were ritish the asserts, imawi n furtherin the aim of self of aim the furtherin n While the is the first first the is the While as seen is ritish policy he stresses aeli state of ews, who were a small minority at that time, would possess possess would time, that at minority small a were who ews, of state aeli

s (an ttoman term mea term (an ttoman , but a United Nations report prepared in 1980 confirms Saleh’s claims claims Saleh’s confirms in 1980 prepared report Nations United a but , in country is the oviet nion (Kramer, 2017: ). eardin American American ).2017: eardin (Kramer, nion oviet country is the in allocation and and allocation 198. he nited tates reconis tates henited 198.

that only less than 1 of alestinian lands were ouht from from ouht were lands alestinian of 1 than only less that ration of more ews (Al arhan, 2017: 2). t was ruman that ruman that 2). was t 2017: arhan, more(Al of ews ration

rants came to alestine from urope in the first ten years of the of the years first ten the in fromurope to alestine came rants conversely h left alestine, and sraeli leaders declared independence, independence, declared leaders sraeli and alestine, left h purchasin strenthened the position of ews and and ews of position the strenthened purchasin

nin uncultivated wasteland far from populated populated far from wasteland uncultivated nin claims that ewish companies owned 20 of 20 owned companies ewish claims that de facto de facto overnance, allowin new waves of miration of miration waves new allowin overnance, a facilitation of ewish colonis facilitationofa ewish s in the ewish state thans to ionist loy loy to ionist thans state ewish the in onialism’ and ‘non and onialism’ reconis ed srael minutes after proclamation, proclamation, after minutes srael ed

er of srael, the fir the srael, of er din the rest of the lands, lands, of rest the the din hat finally proposed the the proposed finally hat formal colonialism’. As colonialism’. formal miri may e contested contested e may around

(state lands) andlands) (state ation y many ation many y

y it. n 197, 197, n it. y in 197. in 197. st de jure y partition, Israel could not have come into being come being into have could not Israel partition, leinman to According ews. against dut humanitarian their fulfilled and conscience their consoled Through the support, state. this ewish a to support countries other for persuasive was olocaust the argue that scholars man proven.et is it as clarified be must that number a ews, million si illed Nais that groupsargue ionist torture, besides hand, other the n continuing. also was ussia and urope astern from igration Palestine. to migrated vo whether ews, other possible.addition, In to Palestine ews of migration0,000 maing ionists, erman and erman Nai b signed was Agreement aavara 19,the In administration. Nai the b fo factor a also be in vote a and Sovietarms without that said once Abba ban, UN, that believed Israelis .rom onwards, speech this 017 ramer, shoced envos that in 1947 said UN, the to ambassador Soviet romo, fo point turning a Israel, to weapons sell to government Cech the ased he Thus, . 1998 at, Arabs of instead ews to support was ast iddle in the ritishinfluence the to undermine onl wa of father Is founding the Stalin was oseph Soviet 1998, ohnson to According state. ewish of the foundation the supported Stalin staunchl that proven have revelations new owever, Israel. of independence the opposed have should SovietUnion that thin facts,one ma on these ased Israel. of archenemies Arabs,the the with other Soviets allied hand, the the Union. n Soviet to the opposite bloc,i.e. capitalist in the itself posited state Israeli the oreover, ussians. the with terms not were o ews Therefore, there. ews the against directed the were immigration of the ofreasons the ne urope. astern ussiaand came from of whom most ofimmigrants, ewish state a was recognition.Israel b aiden Iron the of leader recognis h arshall eorge inister oreign or eample, state. accomplices close Truman’s of fact, some In eile. ablonian the from erusalem to bac return to ews helped that ing Persian ancient Crus, the himself called he in 19, presidenc his after audience ramer to According ears. criti ew, a closest friendwas whose Truman, 14. 008 owever, cisms and warnings, and recognis and warnings, cisms and

esides estern support for a ewish state, estern hatred of ews might hatredestern ofmight ews state, ewish a supportestern for esides the of Israel, foundation the towards attitude Union’s Soviet the Regarding their countrtheir would recognis be e Israel or, otherwise, he would not work for Truman’s re Truman’s for work wouldhe not otherwise, or, Israel e

00, it was the olocaust that swaed world UN opinion forthe theswaed olocaustthat was it 00, r its establishment. In erman, ews were unwanted people people unwanted were ews erman, In establishment. its r rael although he hated ews and ionism. e new that the that ionism. new and e ews although hated rael he

017 , when Truman was introduced to a ewish ewish a to introduced was Truman when , 017 loc recognis loc

ed globally. Israel’s fi Israel’s globally. ed ed Israel. ed ed the new state shortl after the US US the shortl after state new the ed r the Arab r the were against an independent ewish ewish independent an against were luntaril or b escaping from Nais, from Nais, escaping b orluntaril

ramer, 017 ramer,

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? Israeli ar of 1948. hen hen of 1948. ar Israeli ad warned Truman not to to Truman not warned ad “ rst ambassador to the to rstthe ambassador .

not historicall not historicall election ren, ren, election neglected all neglected favour ” , Israeli , Israeli n good good n the the

of of

195 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 196 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) alestine. irst, alestine. in state ewish of creation a to the led that other factors to ignore misleading wouldit be wasincontrovertible, est the supportof the oflthough Israel. State of the foundation on the effect estern the eamined section previous The ISRAEL STATE OF THE ESTABLISHING FOR ZIONIST EFFORTS bylocals opposable be not country would aconald, ideology olshevist under citiens Soviet million of slaughter the role in a of having accused were ews addition, In to assimilation. resistance their and social and life culture politics, economy, ha lived they in which home countries the of people the that here noted be should It II. ar inorld massacre the incurred urope untilleave they reluctant to were ews etc.owever, uyana, Tasmania, ho ewish autonomous called oblast autonomous ewish a in of Russia territories eastern in far ews gather self ewi a proposed ascists ermany, Italian esides . rowning, in adagascar to ews send forcibly to alsotried ermany ai properties. for their the en avid with deal a made itler eample, or not. did they indeed and to alestine, ews of migration the oppose would not they to alestine, immigrate to decided ews if ence, population. ewish of their rid themselves to sta many agenda, on the appeared home in alestine ewish a when Therefore, in uropean societies. community unwanted an were ews clear that was It olocaust. the long before occasions on several pogroms The e them. against hatred and defamation discriminations, preudices, were there lived, they countries inthe not assimilated were sinceews Inaddition, of Israel. State ofapproval the ewish state ewish various countries of urope, were ews ofvarious countries urope, a as not perhaps Third, goals. to reach their them would enable that enormous wealth people with ualified divided. ence, divided. was power their but powerful, uite were They clashes. ideological and revolution ews to alestine. In fact, the late s witnessed ewish migration from astern astern from migration ewish witnessed s late the fact, In alestine. to ews d the became of duties main ionists the of Thus, . one nesset, organis asel in convened ongress ionist irst the at colleagues T by founded was The alestine. in home national Ibrahim KARATAŞ independent of borders independent centralis and ‘ governing territory in northeast thiopia Time, . Stalin also tried to to Stalin . alsotried Time, thiopia in northeast governingterritory transfer agreement transfer It was the was It ation was stated as establishing a legal home in ret Israel alestine alestine ret Israel home in legal a establishing as stated was ation e their power and establish a network among ews, which was to be be to was which ews, among network a establish and power their e . Second, ews as a as ews Second, . that organis initiatedand

the only way realis only way for to the them the was established solely for the goal of founding of goal founding for solely the established was the Rosen, . There were more attempts to create an to an create more attempts were .There Rosen, . ’ meland in ofworldparts apan, meland the various US, the

that permitted ews to migrate to alestine in echange echange in to alestine migrate to ews permitted that clusionary clusionary people people

but ind but behaviours . ted Jewish wealth, Jews’ influence in influence Jews’ wealth, Jewish ted

ividually, and as small communities as communities in small and ividually, were rich,generally educated and involved in colonis involved ed ewish movement for creating a for a movement ewish creating ed e t heir goal

against ews even turned into turned into even ews against tes saw it as an opportunity an as it tes saw . Therefore, a ewish ewish a Therefore, . s was to unite, organisto unite, was s in . The goal of the of the goal The in . heodor erl and his his and erl heodor

ation, industrial industrial ation, urion called called urion iverting ofiverting of a of sh e

ews to alestine. In fact, the late s witnessed ewish migration from astern astern from migration ewish witnessed s late the fact, In alestine. to ews d the became of duties main ionists the of Thus, . one nesset, organis asel in convened ongress ionist irst the at colleagues T by founded was The alestine. in home national of borders independent centralis and ence, divided. was power their but powerful, uite were They clashes. ideological and revolution were ews ofvarious countries urope, a as not perhaps Third, goals. to reach their them would enable that enormous wealth people with ualified state ewish irst, alestine. in state ewish of creation a to the led that other factors to ignore misleading wouldit be wasincontrovertible, est the supportof the oflthough Israel. State of the foundation on the effect estern the eamined section previous The ISRAEL STATE OF THE ESTABLISHING FOR ZIONIST EFFORTS bylocals opposable be not country would aconald, ideology olshevist under citiens Soviet million of slaughter the role in a of having accused were ews addition, In to assimilation. resistance their and social and life culture politics, economy, ha lived they in which home countries the of people the that here noted be should It II. ar inorld massacre the incurred urope untilleave they reluctant to were ews etc.owever, uyana, Tasmania, ho ewish autonomous called oblast autonomous ewish a in of Russia territories eastern in far ews gather self ewi a proposed ascists ermany, Italian esides . rowning, in adagascar to ews send forcibly to alsotried ermany ai properties. for their the en avid with deal a made itler eample, or not. did they indeed and to alestine, ews of migration the oppose would not they to alestine, immigrate to decided ews if ence, population. ewish of their rid themselves to sta many agenda, on the appeared home in alestine ewish a when Therefore, in uropean societies. community unwanted an were ews clear that was It olocaust. the long before occasions on several pogroms The e them. against hatred and defamation discriminations, preudices, were there lived, they countries inthe not assimilated were sinceews Inaddition, of Israel. State ofapproval the ‘ governing territory in northeast thiopia Time, . Stalin also tried to to Stalin . alsotried Time, thiopia in northeast governingterritory transfer agreement transfer It was the was It ation was stated as establishing a legal home in ret Israel alestine alestine ret Israel home in legal a establishing as stated was ation e their power and establish a network among ews, which was to be be to was which ews, among network a establish and power their e . Second, ews as a as ews Second, .

that organis initiatedand

the only way realis only way for to the them the was established solely for the goal of founding of goal founding for solely the established was the Rosen, . There were more attempts to create an to an create more attempts were .There Rosen, . ’ meland in ofworldparts apan, meland the various US, the

that permitted ews to migrate to alestine in echange echange in to alestine migrate to ews permitted that clusionary clusionary people people

but ind but behaviours .

ted Jewish wealth, Jews’ influence in influence Jews’ wealth, Jewish ted

ividually, and as small communities as communities in small and ividually, were rich,generally educated and involved in colonis involved ed ewish movement for creating a for a movement ewish creating ed e t heir goal

against ews even turned into turned into even ews against tes saw it as an opportunity an as it tes saw . Therefore, a ewish ewish a Therefore, . s was to unite, organisto unite, was s in . The goal of the of the goal The in . heodor erl and his his and erl heodor

ation, industrial industrial ation, urion called called urion iverting ofiverting of a of sh e

destinatins, f destinatins, new in the ntwelced wee Jews wee, aali, t due anti ue esten ue t the st Jewish natinalis was anti was natinalis Jewish st the helinwas elwadditin,n what eidence see idel fact in inist can e it still et, Jews attact and idel inist ustif t de in ilicalises wielded the wee, eliin d with nthin t had f ees centu an th in the in ue eents Jewis as inists eliius ein than athe eent natinalist a e t aued was inis ee, alestine int settle Jews iatin encuaed with and t deal ean thschilds idel since the efused the itish the efused sincethe idel inist f at a was eliin that clue a as eaded ae n alestine insistence the and heland a as anda f efusal al, idea the eected en f ein ldet (in today’s in region Jewish autonomous an Britishproposal of the with etuned el thschild d f hel the with haelain Jseh eceta e ie he althuh the, esuade t failed el wee, ente, nfatin sael ean f ilhel and ie f ttan ultan the t eet alestine t stan taelled e in alestine state Jewish f a f wes eat cunities an Jewish anti hee Jews an ula ecae inis e the inceased, eitis f the itish ie itishie the f ie ttan the f difficult t secede was which alestine, ulated deain f a Jewish state unde itish tectin nthe Jew, i ses ai ai i ses Jew, nthe tectin itish unde state Jewish f a deain n eclaatin alfu the afte and efe itish the essued lied and elites Jewish ndeed, isleadin e wuld eclaatin alfu fiues Jewish f the leadin efftsthe f fJ necessit a the ees cainet t the auel elained that, t d s esides the auel assisted eet iniste Jewish ees, cainet t eet wished the e,is when hat f alestine ects thei esent t ties itain an f l ahu and eiann hai eale, intellectuals Jewish and thschild d lie Jews influential ich and nteen thee had such ien decisin a nt iht hae the fitish,ut the inteest inthe is that a e as fhis ant a itis eaded the in alestine he natinal Jewish a f idea the acceted the that thschild de d an t lette a alfu wte eceta ein itish , n a ld the duin susedl eitis ecae a useful tl f inists in de t tae t and w t w t and tae in de useful afinists tl ecae eitis s sn as the was funded, hed el stated t see the sut sut the t see stated el hed funded, was the as sn s hethe eliius natinal, the inist idel was ale t tain sut t tain sut ale inist was idel the natinal, eliius hethe

then tuned t itain and isited t itish fficials includin lnial lnial fficials includin t itish isited and t itain tuned then uthe inceasin anti inceasin uthe

ffeed the ultan t a the entie fein det f the ttan f ttan the det fein entie the t a ultan the ffeed ewish heland in alestine auel, eall, inin auel, eall, the in alestine heland ewish a, ut he and the ees f the inist ness ness inist f the ees the and he ut a, as alestine was was alestine

, itish ie iniste enain isaeli was isaeli was enain iniste ie ,itish eitist sentients heefe, the and and the heefe, sentients eitist h natinalists wee influenced natinalist natinalist influenced wee h natinalists eitic s haenin in ussia in in ussia in haenin s eitic t e eitis in ue he e anti e he ue in eitis sal and insisted nusli a insisted and sal aued that eliin was a cucial cucial a eliin was that aued ccuied the clnial the ccuied we

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? h ie,decisin a ul and ul and isited isited fe, fe,

197 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 198 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) o is t (alroo rasin alestine mainly other people and inhaitants Jewish ( were there that estimated uthority andate efore one year inally the Jewish population was ( while the rest inluding n inluding rest the while ( was population Jewish the of ensus to the ording aar and (Beinin numered inhaitants ra while to rose population Jewish the By Jews i was population in alestinian reords the ttoman to ording in in alestine arried migrants Jewish au pries uite high ( in ares and in ares( (in ares in ( initi was landownership Jewish while oughtto ( moreording alroo was land while a for alestine in landowner Jewish largest the eame who othshild dmond de esta the ith state future their to migrated Jews of thousands and entury th mpire ttoman the urop to debt whole Empire’s the offered to he pay Sultan, from Ottoman Palestine erlwanted heodor oreoer when home in alestine a them to gie hurhill lie politiians onined fator that a wealth their was Jews aout the influen was what aoe stated as addition n (oo of urope Ban entral the alled were and ontinent uropean offamily the rihest the were they alestine to migration Jewish the and the funded er and U in the than different no ingdom was United situationhe in the Jewish were orporations large of ofmanagers top tates United the n aground Jewish a had networ J of numer the while and etween wealth Jewish researhed who ( to indolf ording lied they in whih ountries in the ommunities persuade to powers of great poliymaers surrounding was it and of srael foundation the longefore atie was loyism Jewish (ramer Jew herefore a also was Kingdom,who United to ambassador the Union’s Soviet the with contact ei haim urthermore (ren Jew a whofriend was oreoe arhan (l elaration Balfour the to aept ilson resident pressured an ouis Brandeis addition n (aylor for wored deelopment and its times seen Jerusalem isited ontefiore Ibrahim KARATAŞ ews was in erman population of memers of the ore orporate orporate ore of the memers of population in erman was ews ious that without Jewish institutions Jewish without ious that lishment Using wereother wealthier than that they was Jews of harateristi nother the numer of migrants rose year y year he first wae of uropean firsthe wae year y rose year migrants of numer isitionthe e his fat shows that fisally Jewish was more powerful than more powerful than diaspora was Jewish fisally that fat shows his e them aept their reuest their aept them

this wealth land was ought y Jews in alestine in the first half of the first half of in the the oughtin alestine Jews was land y wealth this

r, Truman’s decision to recognis to decision r,Truman’s of the alestine Jewish olonis Jewish alestine of the

with muh of thi muh with

ally ally ome of the land was of land omethe ares ( in it eame ares( s land alloated y the British the y alloated land s many egarding the othshild family that that family othshild the egarding many the estalishment of srael of estalishment the

migration ould notorganis e ould migration ation ssoiation ( y Baron ( Baron y ssoiation ation nhaitants of whom were were of whom nhaitants e srael was partly due to his est est to due his partly was srael e

ought from loal ras with with ras fromloal ought influential an ionist ionist merian influential ing British thining thining British ing ie in the the in ie arallel to land land to arallel

ares on mann was in was mann ras was ras was ed and o is t (alroo rasin alestine mainly other people and inhaitants Jewish ( were there that estimated uthority andate efore one year inally n inluding rest the while ( was population Jewish the of ensus to the ording aar and (Beinin numered inhaitants ra while to rose population Jewish the By Jews i was population in alestinian reords the ttoman to ording in in alestine arried migrants Jewish au pries uite high ( in ares and in ares( (in ares in ( initi was landownership Jewish while oughtto ( moreording alroo was land while a for alestine in landowner Jewish largest the eame who othshild dmond de esta the ith state future their to migrated Jews of thousands and entury th mpire ttoman the urop to debt whole Empire’s the offered to he pay Sultan, from Ottoman Palestine erlwanted heodor oreoer when home in alestine a them to gie hurhill lie politiians onined fator that a wealth their was Jews aout the influen was what aoe stated as addition n (oo of urope Ban entral the alled were and ontinent uropean offamily the rihest the were they alestine to migration Jewish the and the funded er and U in the than different no ingdom was United situationhe in the Jewish were orporations large of ofmanagers top tates United the n aground Jewish a had networ J of numer the while and etween wealth Jewish researhed who ( to indolf ording lied they in whih ountries in the ommunities persuade to powers of great poliymaers surrounding was it and of srael foundation the longefore atie was loyism Jewish (ramer Jew herefore a also was Kingdom,who United to ambassador the Union’s Soviet the with contact ei haim urthermore (ren Jew a whofriend was oreoe arhan (l elaration Balfour the to aept ilson resident pressured an ouis Brandeis addition n (aylor for wored deelopment and its times seen Jerusalem isited ontefiore ews was in erman population of memers of the ore orporate orporate ore of the memers of population in erman was ews ious that without Jewish institutions Jewish without ious that lishment nother harateristi of Jews was that they were wealthier than other wereother wealthier than that they was Jews of harateristi nother Using isition e his fat shows that fisally was more powerful than more powerful than diaspora was Jewish fisally that fat shows his e

them aept their reuest their aept them

the numer of migrants rose year y year he first wae of uropean firsthe wae year y rose year migrants of numer the this wealth land was ought y Jews in alestine in the first half of the first half of in the the oughtin alestine Jews was land y wealth this

r, Truman’s decision to recognis to decision r,Truman’s of the alestine Jewish olonis Jewish alestine of the

with muh of thi muh with

ally ally ome of the land was of land omethe ares ( in it eame ares( s land alloated y the British the y alloated land s many egarding the othshild family that that family othshild the egarding many the estalishment of srael of estalishment the

migration ould notorganis e ould migration nhaitants of whom were were of whom nhaitants ( Baron y ssoiation ation e srael was partly due to his est est to due his partly was srael e

ought from loal ras with with ras fromloal ought influential merian ionist ionist merian influential ing British thining thining British ing ie in the the in ie arallel to land land to arallel

ares on mann was in was mann ras was ras was ed and following wars as well, causing more occupation of Palestinian occupation more causing well, as wars following in the defeated were armies rab to from territory its of percentage the result,a s increased srael defeated were they trained, poorly troopswere first rab the during troops to Palestine ra sent and Transordan ctually,Syria, , state aboutPalestinian the plans League’s Arab concocting was return, opp Syria and Egypt owever, plan their about sraelis with negotiations made and Palestine rab to anne tried ashemites Transordan , Khader to ccording Palestine rab future of Os ewish purchas land words, other n Palestine in shelter a found have not might migrants was alsonotpro was Union halted migrationSoviet The Paperthat issuance ofhite the through a eg times, several migration ewish impeded had it ritain, egarding f ewish his against stand could not but eclaration alfour the to endorse reluctant Thus, was he toideas his due raborld in the prestige widespread had ilson oreover, Oren, of Suerisis srael as as srael their of lands forthe srael counter to reluctant were regimes was Palestine Therefore, independence since stability notenoy do still countries rabmany now, Even eternal threats and own their domestic strugglingto manage were they reasonthat is One ofstates rab concern notof was etraordinary Palestine independence n independence its for of fighting instead Palestine anne to preferred they above, mentioned weapons sales to srael and his to and srael sales weapons vetoed Eisenhower wight urthermore, srael of recognition the against was Marshall Secretary Foreign Truman’s addition, In Jews. about good remarks ion di ichard revealed, ouse tapes hite as , to Kayyali ccording in public them to disclose intimidated too were butews, they about from rabs evacuated they hile state of ewish the formation to the epand and state Palestinian abolishthe will en avid on arguments their basing partition, bi a accepted never leadership ionist the , alt and an notwant indepe ionistsalso did not was they srael something by of Palestine occupation the obviously owever, state independent an than rather provinces ‘ leaders were philo were leaders began Plan elat Plan On the othe the On eanwhile, while the rab Streets were full of full srae were Streets rab the while eanwhile,

ing and migration was an organis an was migration and ing “the “the ’ , they also occupied rab Palestine as soon as the first rab soon the as as rab alsooccupied Palestine they , millstone around our necks” our around millstone

sraeli ar of , but since but, of since ar sraeli

is a secondary case Second, in distancing themselves, rab rab themselves, in distancing Second, case secondary a is r hand, rab states were in conflict with each other about the the other about each with in conflict were states rab r hand,

ewish but their strategic interests in the id interests strategic their but ewish other words, they wanted to see Palestine as one of their one of toas their see Palestine wanted they other words, Semitist s Some policymaers did not have have not did policymaers Some osed this idea and wored hard to prevent it n it hardto prevent wored and idea this osed efence

ndent Palestine ccording to earsheimer ccording Palestine to earsheimer ndent

and threatened to sanction it during the the during it to sanction threatened and Secretary ohnoster ullesdescribed ed policy steered by legal and illegal legal by and policyed steered favoured they were less euipped and their their euipped and less were they Gurion’s statement that Zionists Zionists that statement Gurion’s

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? riend’s insistence (Al Sarhan, Sarhan, (Al insistence riend’s

, either On the other hand, the On either , whole Palestine after the the after whole Palestine li hatred, not all estern estern not all li hatred, ‘ cousins ‘ favourable sraeli national state or or state national dle East forced East dle

lands n fact, fact, n lands d not mae not d ’ state with with state ’ sraeli ar ar sraeli ’ Third, as as Third,

views views

199 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 200 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) American hatred among Arab people. Thereore, S sacriice or Israel or sacriice S Thereore, people. Arab among hatred American as an independent Israel will be orced to produce its indigenous weapons, weapons, indigenous its produce to orced be will Israel independent an as country orthe better be een may it but suer, may Israel that argue newspapers diaspora Jewish and published in Israeli Articles aid American surie without otherwise. reuire interests American i ineectie become can easily and eaggerated is lobby o Jewish the power the that thinks onto Ameri attacks and opposition alt, hi to technology military S not S sold obey data, instructionsdid and classiied sensitie stole Israel addition, In troops. to American support notgie did Israel ast, Middle in the wars ought in seeral Salthough army the that claim They scholars. American some by uestioned is S o billions spending and o Israel serenity and security or the support American oweer, Israel. one priority was numbertheir that said r ocongressional out occasionswhen were There etc. JISA, AL, AIPA, irmslike using by donationsor lobby pressure, through academia and media ongress, impacton great the hae Jews American and on.Israeli ignor aid, military largest the granted support, anti etoed always S has the lobby, Israeli o the inluence to the .Thanks would interests American rom what away successully so policy oreign S to diert able been hae S the groupsin interest other o . (Mast, lobby JewishIsraeli o power the rom to stem not a is aid .S the etc. Thereore, likemilitary, education,in areas health, belt its to tighten i has it withouteen it do can it that clear is It not. or aid S without lie can Israel whether is here of its 20% or budget, its national 3% of GDP, Israel’s o iseual Sto aid The annual by. S billion around be amount will the and S billion was to rom to Israel assistance , S total to Fre According whichcontinues. still orm cash weapons, or the o in state to Israeli result,began itaid a As it. to gie supported onand rely Israel Si untilthe est country notindispensable an was Israel approach.act, In estern a meant almost SThus, approach to the Israel oest. rest the on o behal the decisions made and oS goernment the leadership under the replaced was it II, orldater ar staunchly anti being or Stalin, known therwise, independence. Israeli endorse to them Ibrahim KARATAŞ epresentaties, or out o senators supported Israel. Some o them openly openly o them Some Israel. supported senators o out or epresentaties, Israel resolutions in the nited ations Security ouncil, gien ull diplomatic diplomatic ull gien ouncil, Security ations nited in the resolutions Israel Assuming or a while that the S no longer gies aid to Israel, can the l can the Israel, to aid gies longer S no the that while ora Assuming th o support The imperialism global its maintain to notable was ingdom nited the Since

. Moreoer, absolute support o Israel has caused the growth o growth the caused has o Israel absolute support . Moreoer, Semitist, would not hae would Semitist, ay ar. hen Israel deeated Arabs in , the S began to to S began the Arabs in , deeated Israel hen ar. ay e na, indicating that it is not a loyal ally ( ally loyal a it isnot indicating that na, S, whether iscal, military or any other type, is claimed claimed is type, other any or military iscal, S,whether sine ua non non ua sine can orces. n the other hand, homsky ( ( homsky other hand, can the orces.n

by the S. Thereore, the estern bloc came bloc came estern the Thereore, S. the by otherwise reuire (Mearsheimer and alt, alt, and (Mearsheimer reuire otherwise recognis ed Israeli nuclear weapons, and so so and weapons, nuclear Israeli ed or Israel. or ed Israel. ed deence

budget. The ue The budget.

or the S or or the the oror S or the Mearsheimer and and Mearsheimer ,

led to Arab Arab to led ilich ( stion stion atter atter as an independent Israel will be orced to produce its indigenous weapons, weapons, indigenous its produce to orced be will Israel independent an as country orthe better be een may it but suer, may Israel that argue newspapers diaspora Jewish and published in Israeli Articles aid American surie without otherwise. reuire interests American i ineectie become can easily and eaggerated is lobby o Jewish the power the that thinks onto Ameri attacks and opposition Israel or sacriice S Thereore, people. Arab among hatred American alt, hi to technology military S not S sold obey data, instructionsdid and classiied sensitie stole Israel addition, In troops. to American support notgie did Israel ast, Middle in the sc American some by uestioned is S o billions spending and o Israel serenity and security or the support American oweer, Israel. one priority was numbertheir that said r ocongressional out occasionswhen were There etc. JISA, AL, AIPA, irmslike using by donationsor lobby pressure, through academia and media ongress, impacton great the hae Jews American and on.Israeli ignor aid, military largest the granted support, anti etoed always S has the lobby, Israeli o the inluence to the .Thanks would interests American rom what away successully so policy oreign S to diert able been hae S the groupsin interest other o . (Mast, lobby JewishIsraeli o power the rom to stem not a is aid .S the etc. Thereore, likemilitary, education,in areas health, belt its to tighten i has it withouteen it do can it that clear is It not. or aid S without lie can Israel whether is here of its 20% or budget, its national 3% of GDP, Israel’s o iseual Sto aid The annual by. S billion around be amount will the and S billion was to rom to Israel assistance , S total to Fre According whichcontinues. still orm cash weapons, or the o in state to Israeli result,began itaid a As it. to gie supported onand rely Israel Si untilthe est country notindispensable an was Israel approach.act, In estern a meant almost SThus, approach to the Israel oest. rest the on o behal the decisions made and oS goernment the leadership under the replaced was it II, orldater ar staunchly anti being or Stalin, known therwise, independence. Israeli endorse to them epresentaties, or out o senators supported Israel. Some o them openly openly o them Some Israel. supported senators o out or epresentaties, Israel resolutions in the nited ations Security ouncil, gien ull diplomatic diplomatic ull gien ouncil, Security ations nited in the resolutions Israel Since the nited ingdom was not able to maintain its global imperialism imperialism global its maintain to notable was ingdom nited the Since Assuming or a while that the S no longer gies aid to Israel, can the l can the Israel, to aid gies longer S no the that while ora Assuming th o support The

holars. They claim that although the S army ought in seeral wars wars ought in seeral Salthough army the that claim They holars. . Moreoer, absolute support o Israel has caused the growth o growth the caused has o Israel absolute support . Moreoer, Semitist, would not hae would Semitist, ay ar. hen Israel deeated Arabs in , the S began to to S began the Arabs in , deeated Israel hen ar. ay e na, indicating that it is not a loyal ally ( ally loyal a it isnot indicating that na, S, whether iscal, military or any other type, is claimed claimed is type, other any or military iscal, S,whether sine ua non non ua sine can orces. n the other hand, homsky ( ( homsky other hand, can the orces.n

by the S. Thereore, the estern bloc came bloc came estern the Thereore, S. the by otherwise reuire (Mearsheimer and alt, alt, and (Mearsheimer reuire otherwise

recognis ed Israeli nuclear weapons, and so so and weapons, nuclear Israeli ed or Israel. or ed Israel. ed deence

budget. The ue The budget.

or the S or or the the oror S or the Mearsheimer and and Mearsheimer ,

led to Arab Arab to led ilich ( stion stion atter atter uroean igt feel alien in an rab ountr, but ese a feel a butese ountr, rab an in alien feel igt uroean ae uroe fro igrants loser eis are lifestles sine een ost to oter,ea teir lose teiruite are ile to religions te beteen udeo ulturall, beause, first, ire ritis te b led ountries estern b establised as Israel Palestine self ofall et te sentients, nationalist oties, religious urasing lands, ‘ a rel a id fro te lands to roised teir ba return toto aied es el te and estaent it its its it not reain of reuests deaf robabl and to rab it street te oroise a itill isalone, Israel en states rab oter and Palestinians tote onessions of la te s oeer, destrutieatta sudden isa tere unless suort itout itself foreign defend foring ilit oers, of great oliaers relationsit lose of establisent lobbing,te donations eiann, and erl lie ionist indiiduals of efforts te , e reation its toards oer teir all dediated te and forionists atter eistential an as state eis a beause isis etent o aieeents ilitar and eonoi to due soial, founded riaril Israelolitial, sas e as en eaggerating be 3of igt ionists olfsonn soadantages fort, all and ere fornat need a as it toug Israel, role a in foundingad es tat souldit aditted be te, efore disussing b est reasons reated Israel te to due as seeral tat an assessed It be PROJECT OR ZIONIST A WESTERN IS ISRAEL WHETHER ABOUT ASSESSMENT diffiulties fae ore a ould it but suort, and aid te itout surie ould Israel erall, asington but i el to loser get to ant beause te not is it Israel, it deals eae signing are rabia audi and gt arain, suortso is ita suort esides, to aette orouldit robabl instane, ba to ste not need does it oer, diloati and eonoi olitial, ilitar, adaned adaned an surie, Israel tat stud elusie to tis interie in an said solar, rian,Palestinian a l ai bot Professor or ina, or ussia eiter it an all Israel laitat een tereb Israel reated reasons b es to establis a eis state eis a toestablis es b reasons reated igious dut b soe ristians soe b dut igious oeer, none of tese fators ere enoug to establis a oeland in oeland a enougto establis ere fators none of oeer, tese ’ In addition, angelial Protestants belieed at as ritten in te ld in te ritten as at belieed Protestants angelial addition, In neigbours defene but it great diffiult l diffiult great it but tuall ill not feel te la of erian aid Pfeffer, 20 e also also e 20 Pfeffer, aid erian of la te feel not ill tuall ant grous in Palestine, organis Palestine, in grous ant 00s onards erefore, te establisent of Israel as deeed deeed as of Israel establisent te erefore, onards 00s ional oe to esae froanti esae ional oe to

industr and soistiated eaons lie atoi bobs, it an an it bobs, atoi lie eaons soistiated and industr

to ensure its se its to ensure relatiel relatiel

uort ill ertainl fore Israel to negotiate and gie and to negotiate fore Israel uort ertainl ill sall eis ealt, ualified uan oer, te te oer, uan ualified ealt, eis sall

r urit oeer, urrentl, sine it relies on sine it relies urit urrentl, oeer,

istian ulture is te basi oon oint oint oon basi te is ulture istian and artiularl ristian ionists ristian artiularl and f ionists, but e is still rigt to soe to soe rigt still is e but f ionists, rian, 2020 Gien tat Israel as an an as Israel tat Gien 2020 rian, l tat if rab states su as te ,su te as if rabl tat states eiti disriination and ogros ogros and disriination eiti state solution ad tere not been solution notbeen tere ad state ing and oordinating igration, igration, oordinating and ing

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? e to gie onessions and to e onessions and gie

of te otsilds, otsilds, of te

at oe in oe in at eond, eond, se ere

201 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 202 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) notonlyrid their ofhome to was get Jewish for a desire support Russians’ behind ‘ CONCLUSION Ibrahim KARATAŞ

‘ ’

e Jews’ money and offered so ’

‘ CONCLUSION notonlyrid their ofhome to was get Jewish for a desire support Russians’ behind

‘ ’

e Jews’ money and offered so ’

pow of estern permission and help the with alestine in founded was srael that argues study this powers onseuently estern of support state without to a the found not softadeuate their power was in role their herefore founded was srael of tate the politiians onputting estern pressure am enormous an spending by entually for legitimay ountries of othersupport to obtain and the home national Jewish fora ritishmpire the to persuade assets their all used ionists state of a neessity the of them onined oloaust earlier to found their own state in the lands lands in the state own their to found inthe branh estern a being strategi a was state Jewish a erall emigrate ould they to whih Jews for home national a welomed they adersaries its nation a that theory study’s this with in line Therefore, the and th in the leel nti to purify fromJews soiety was supportstate sraeli uropeans made fator that nother alestine about laims in iblial trust and ount of money lobbying organis lobbying money of ount n the other hand the Jewish diaspora under the leadership of ionists tried tried ionists of leadership the under diaspora Jewish the other hand the n hile not all Jews supported the idea rising anti rising idea the supported Jews notall hile

reating srael should not be underestimated oweer oweer underestimated be shouldsrael not reating

th entury sometimes ulminating in pogroms in pogroms ulminating sometimes th entury ‘ iddle ast iddle

ing migration forming militant groups and and groups militant forming ing migration from from ’ where they epelled were at least before its independene its before least at tool for the est rather than than rather est the for tool

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? ers state an be founded by by an founded be state emitism was at its pea its at was emitism emitism and and emitism

years

the the

203 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 204 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) alroo, The lienat The alroo, adai, adai, ardai, ,teiner, Tohen, and ert, eria srael an urieithout reilih, edar,and oran, aw in andate and olonialis, oloniation, and einin, aar, and alestine, ra srael The and T eer, rownin, srael nforation enter srael enter nforation yason, erl, T ishah, ishah, hosy, ast iddle the and oliy nitedtates orein l arhan, ar l BIBLIOGRAPHY l leeland, leeland, ain, andate alestineain, oliy the Th ritishnstitution and in uildin Ediz, İ. (2019). A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of the and oo, othshildoo, istoryof the aily Ibrahim KARATAŞ latt, This ay in istory aoleon in aoleon in istory ay This latt, Awaisi, K. and Yiğit, E. Early (2020). Foreign Penetration in rian, rian, n, , n, dwan ournal iertarian tudies o and ffie ffie ofsrael nitiatie enforation ulishin httswwwostohristian heoretical nuiries a heoretical in al or The alestine niersity ress niersity ashinton nstitute etemer httswestan ire n essed on ttoan eriod The ole of ritain eriodttoan oleof ritain The olitical cience olitical of the ritish orein oliy inof alestine oliy the ritish orein essed on essed on ofalestinian a tatehttwwwiftahoroeialtudiesritaindf, httswwwinestoediaoudateshistory outledeor srael o tate the o the irth essed on

ducatin oard a ulture o eace ducatin o ulture a oard orein oliy astin the iddle orein he eish tate eish he

, oeer ,

and nershi in alestine in nershi and his and is and is and his he laim or econition o srael as a eish tate eish a as srael o econition or laim he , – , , The rieroet eae hared istory fordedurouseriaesalestine

arch arch he riins o the inal olution he olution o ai eisholic o olution he olution the inal o riins he

istory of the odern iddle ast n n iddleof ast the odern istory eish roert laims laims eish roert ritish roects or the estoration o the es o or the estoration roects ritish

ara and arrat isarya andistorial isutes ersetie arrat and in ara

nteriewuthor y , ,

inoln niersity inoln of ress erasa

, , erl ionism and ew or oerew uliations or , leeland, and unton, ds, ds, unton, and leeland, , ion of a oeland ow alestine eae srael alestine eae ow ion ofoeland a ewsThis ew or yths and ats yths ats and or ew ournal o slamicerusalem tudies ournalslamicerusalem o srael ital sset o ital srael o sset

aainst

arih İncelemeleri Dergisi arih İncelemeleri ew or The alestine ra efuee efuee ra alestine The or ew

day , ra, ed, , ra, erusale ha erusaleress ha

rothshild

in ersonal interiew, stanul interiew, ersonal ra ountries ra history , urial sraelrierdf sraelrierdf ultural ritiueultural the aoleon he alestine andate and he alestine and andate faily,essed on

oly and durin oly and

he est he ew oluia or eeds etty

, the

adrid riends in reenwih reenwih sraeli onflit

en ournal o o ournal en uildin nder uildin nder

ashinton , utun utun , , the oly and oly and the

oly ew ew

the ate ate the

wartin

riins riins

ons he he

srael nforation enter srael enter nforation yason, erl, T ert, lienat The alroo, adai, eria srael an urieithout reilih, edar,and oran, aw in andate and olonialis, oloniation, and ishah, l Ediz, İ. (2019). A Neoclassical Realist Explanation of the Balfour Declaration and andate alestineain, oliy the Th ritishnstitution and in uildin othshildoo, istoryof the aily leeland, hosy, rownin, einin, aar, and alestine, ra srael The and T eer, ardai, ,teiner, Tohen, and ar ast iddle the and oliy nitedtates orein l arhan, l BIBLIOGRAPHY latt, This ay in istory aoleon in inaoleon istory ay This latt, Awaisi, K. and Yiğit, E. Early (2020). Foreign Penetration in rian, rian, n, , n, dwan ashinton nstitute ofsrael nitiatie enforation ulishin ire n cience olitical ournal iertarian tudies o ffie and httswwwostohristian nuiries a heoretical in al or The alestine ress niersity eriodttoan oleof ritain The inof alestine oliy the ritish orein essed on ofalestinian a tatehttwwwiftahoroeialtudiesritaindf, httswwwinestoediaoudateshistory outledeor srael o tate the o the irth etemer essed on httswestan essed on

orein oliy astin the iddle orein eace ducatin o ulture a oard he eish tate eish he

, oeer ,

and nershi in alestine in nershi and his and is and is and his he laim or econition o srael as a eish tate eish a as srael o econition or laim he , – , , The rieroet eae hared istory fordedurouseriaesalestine

arch arch he riins o the inal olution he olution o ai eisholic o olution he olution the inal o riins he

istory of the odern iddle ast n n iddleof ast the odern istory eish roert laims laims eish roert ritish roects or the estoration o the es o or the estoration roects ritish

ara and arrat isarya andistorial isutes ersetie arrat and in ara

nteriewuthor y , ,

inoln niersity inoln of ress erasa

, , erl ionism and ew or oerew uliations or , leeland, and unton, ds, ds, unton, and leeland, , ion of a oeland ow alestine eae srael alestine eae ow ion ofoeland a ewsThis ew or yths and ats yths ats and or ew ournal o slamicerusalem tudies ournalslamicerusalem o srael ital sset o ital srael o sset

aainst

arih İncelemeleri Dergisi arih İncelemeleri ew or The alestine ra efuee efuee ra alestine The or ew

day , ra, ed, , ra, erusale ha erusaleress ha

rothshild

in ersonal interiew, stanul interiew, ersonal ra ountries ra history urial ultural ritiueultural sraelrierdf the aoleon he alestine andate and he alestine and andate faily,essed on

oly and oly and

, he est he ew oluia or eeds etty

, the

adrid riends in reenwih reenwih sraeli onflit

en ournal o o ournal en durin uildin nder uildin nder

ashinton , utun utun , , the oly and oly and the

oly ew ew

the ate ate the

wartin

riins riins

ons he he

Köse, İ. (2018). The Lloyd George Government of of Government George Lloyd The (2018). İ. Köse, nesset nesset aonald, The srael oy ase tudy in ewish in ewish tudy ase oy srael The aonald, ealisffensie trutural ealisoell, efensie n and leinan, T T leinan, ha ast, ast, raer, ho ho raer, erialis ayyali,riinsThe ionis istorial and halidi, earshei ayaey,ritial ionisount athew, the alestineelaration and The andate, alfour nterde at, ynhold, ynhold, osen, iroidhan Oren, M. B. (2008). Israel is Now America’s Closest Ally. Ally. Closest America’s Now and Their ell alestinians id aleh, is Israel (2008). B. M. Oren,

ewish irary irtual oots of the aosy, aosy, ohnson, ohnson, irale srael The httsisraelseenoaul der, der, oe for ews ational to httswwwnessetoilleionenwoenht, on essed arara anta and orein oliy and orein essed on ondon ale niersityondon niersity, ittsurh Program Nuclear ’s and Spring, Arab essed on httwwwshuelatortilesnterdeendenensraelelationsdf, httsosaiaaineoessayisraelioniswho ress eaon arelona httwwwewishaoairoidhaniro inter h Eou o Plsie rm “e Hsoin Perspective. Historian” “New A from Palestine of Exodus the erialist erat httswwwalaytounanetw onferene,nternational tudies nnual ew ssoiation rleans httswwwwsoartiles on essed rooonentsoetrawathetrawathhoriinfrontendtasaaati esearhaulty eries orin ennedy aer oernent hool of israelthe httwwwewishirtualliraryorroots er, alt,er, , , irale, essed on essedirale, on

The orld ionist raniation ionist The orld raniation ies ies

The lost oiet ewish utonoousThe eion lostoietewish ontentluinsetrawath

elleten, endene in in endene , ,

nulished Thesis, onor arneie ellon of

the the aed srael in ford fordniersity ress , ,

The eeloent Theof srael and u alfour elaration the roise alfour

Was Israel a Western Project in Palestine? s israel idhanht, on essed nd eae t the ews ews the t eae nd relationshi essed relationshi on

nfluene saed srael elationshi sraeli elations , , aride ohn ew and aen

israel

The srael oy srael oy The ritish ritish in

oston ohnson

, ,

205 Beytülmakdis Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020, 20 (2) 206 Journal of Islamicjerusalem Studies, 2020, 20 (2) anotti, anotti, u ews eliion Tie olffsohn, Windolf,(2009). der JüdischenP. Das Netzwerk Wirtschaftselite: (1914Deutschland ations nited Terry, in alestineritain

Schölch, A. (1992).1838 Schölch, Palestine, Britain in auel, aylor adey istory of ionis adey aylor istory Ibrahim KARATAŞ or niersityor ress httontenttieotieaaineartile,,,htl, essed on nternational aw iesaden n httswwwunorunisaldouentauto o Palesineo Sudies ohsenalehls ondownloadentraathordressnfileenlishadeirtiles Archives,Oxford. St. College, Anthony’s ontentuloadsistory httsresouressaylororwwwresouresarhiedsi Inlusion und lusion, und Inlusion

Israel acground and S elaions S acground and Israel e uure o Palesine, o emorandum a riis abine uure o e erla eole ernal uilerman o orears ernal niersi o ologna aniersi eie o , , uisition of and in alestine in and uisition of

and

of df, esseddf, on

indolf, a ionisdf essed on The oots of the alfour oliy oots The of

uation, the uation, alestine andate,and insert ashinton ashinton nd nd tihweh, ds, , essed on ,essed on , , tew eis Israeli elaions Israeli

auel ournal ournal ew ew