Parshat Eikev

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parshat Eikev בס״ד Torah BREAD, BUCKS, AND to this verse as well. Man does wall; perhaps he was milling not live by bread alone. The grain, or pumping water that MAKING A LIVING human spirit is such that we irrigated many fields. In his Weekly Man does not live by bread crave more than bread. mind’s eye he saw the 18 - 24 August, 2019 alone. A famous line (it even Human beings are never plentiful crops and the sacks 17 Av – 23 Av, 5779 figured prominently in an ad satisfied with money or of milled grain feeding Torah: for a burger chain some years materialism alone. Money is thousands of people. After Deuteronomy 7:12 - 1:25 ago), but what does it mean? important, but we cannot live twenty-five years of hard Haftorah: The verse comes from this by money exclusively. What labor, when he was about to Isaiah 49:14 - 51:3 week’s Torah reading, and is about job satisfaction? I know be released, the prisoner PARSHAT EIKEV a number of individuals in our asked to be shown the a reference to the miraculous We have Jewish manna, which fell from community who willingly apparatus behind the prison gave up lucrative positions for wall. There was nothing Calendars. If you heaven daily during the would like one, Jewish people’s sojourn in the less rewarding ones, because there! The wheel was just a please send us a wilderness. The conclusion of they found their work wheel—all his “work” had letter and we will the verse is that “rather, by the unstimulating. They were served no useful purpose. The send you one, or utterance of G‑d’s mouth does making lots of cash, but there man collapsed in a dead faint, Calendars ask the man live.” Thus, it is was no emotional reward. I absolutely devastated. His Rabbi/Chaplain to reminding us about the true also know people who have it life’s work had been in vain. contact us. source of human sustenance. all financially, but who are We have a deep-seated need Contrary to popular belief, it nonetheless unhappy people. to know that our life’s work is Do you have family They are very successful— purposeful, physically and on the outside is neither our earthly toil, nor and very miserable. The spiritually. When we struggling? the sweat of our brow, nor all successes we achieve do not understand that every good Please contact or those conferences, meetings have them contact and sales seminars that ensure guarantee our happiness. deed is attached to a complex our office to learn our success. The reality is that After we’ve bought the house spiritual apparatus, that our more about our it is G‑d who sustains us and of our dreams, and our fantasy every action meshes with a family programs. looks after us, in the very sports car, and the latest cell systematic structure of cosmic You and they are same way as our ancestors phones, laptops and DVDs, significance, then our lives we tire of them all. For become endowed with a Family Programs not alone, we are trekking through the desert here to help. were totally dependent on satisfaction to be lasting, it deeper sense of meaning and Him for their daily bread. must be more than material; it purpose. We desperately need We offer free Grape Wealth is a G‑dly gift. At the must be spiritual. We need to know that, in some way, Juice and Matzoh end of the day, it is not our more than bread and money; our work is helping others— for you to be able to business acumen alone that we need stimulation and a that we are making a make the blessings provides our daily bread, but sense of meaningful contribution to society every Shabbos. the blessings from Above achievement. We need to beyond our own selfish needs. Please have your which endow our efforts with know that our lives have Then, we live. Then we are chaplain / Rabbi success. Ask anyone in sales purpose, and that somehow happy. Man does not live by contact us to enroll how often their best-laid plans we have made a difference. bread alone. We simply (available to all and pitches have come to We want to be assured that cannot. GrapeJuice &Matzah prisons). naught, and then, out of the our work is productive and by Rabbi Yossy Goldman blue, a big order comes in will have lasting value. They Hyman & Martha Rogal Center tell the story of a prisoner in a REWARD?! 5804 Beacon Street with little or no effort. Of Pittsburgh, PA 15217 course, it’s not the rule, and Russian labor camp whose One of the primary 412-421-0111 we must be prepared to put in job it was to turn a heavy distinctions between the first Fax: 412-521-5948 effort if we are to succeed. wheel attached to a wall. For paragraph of the Shema www.alephne.org twenty-five years the prisoner (recorded in last week's Torah [email protected] But when it does happen, it reminds us that there are worked at his backbreaking reading) and the second higher forces, beyond our labor. He assumed that this paragraph (in this week's) is control, at work. wheel must be attached to a the latter's reference to reward mill on the other side of the for observance. What is the But there’s another meaning IN JEWISH HISTORY role of reward in Jewish life? It seems to be a mixed August 19, 2019 -18 Av, 5779 bag. On one hand, the belief that G‑d rewards Western Lamp Extinguished (c. 578 BCE). Every evening, the righteous behavior and punishes transgression is one priest would kindle the seven lights of the menorah in the Holy of the 13 fundamental tenets of our faith. On the Temple. Miraculously, although six of the seven candles would other hand, we are implored to be "like a servant who burn out, the western lamp would remain lit until the following serves his master not for the sake of reward" (Ethics evening. During the reign of the idolatrous King Ahaz (father of the of the Fathers 1:3). There are numerous verses pious King Hezekiah), this miracle discontinued. The first time the promising benefit for obedience, counterbalanced by western lamp was found to have extinguished was on 18 Menachem an abundance of ethical writings (particularly Av (or, according to other versions, 17 Menachem Av). (Shulchan emphasized in Chassidic teaching) disparaging Aruch, Orach Chaim 580:2) reward as shallow and superficial. August 20, 2019 - 19 Av, 5779 So if G‑d wants us to "perform the true service Passing of Rabbi Yaakov Culi (1732). Born in Jerusalem in 1689 simply because it is true" (as Maimonides puts it), (5449?), Yaakov Culi moved to Constantinople, Turkey, where he why does He distract us with promises of found adequate facilities and financial backing to publish the scholarly output of his learned grandfather, Rabbi Moses ibn Habib, recompense? Is it a proper to give someone an including classics such as Get Pashut and Ezrat Nashim. The incentive if it's essentially not in his or her best brilliant young scholar quickly came to the attention of the chief interest? rabbi of Constantinople, Yehuda Rosanes, the undisputed leader of But perhaps we have it backwards. We tend to Sephardic Jewry at the time, and he was appointed to the beth din perceive reward as a motivation to serve or an (rabbinical court). Upon the passing of Rosanes, Rabbi Yaakov affirmation of achievement, but perhaps its primary edited and published his late teacher’s writings with his own purpose is not our benefit at all; perhaps rewarding additional glosses: Mishneh Lamelech on Maimonides’s Mishneh us is gratifying to G‑d. Torah and Perishat Derachim. Chassidic teaching emphasizes that all of creation, Toward the end of his own short life, Rabbi Culi began work on the including our divine service, is designed for G‑d's Mea’am Loez, a compendium of rabbinic lore and commentary on interests. That includes reward. Rewarding us serves all books of Scriptures. He wrote in Ladino, then the common language of the Sephardic diaspora. Unfortunately, he never G‑d; it is what He wants. A parent longs to give to completed his project and passed away on 19th Av, 5492 (1732), his child. A husband's desire to shower his wife with having only completed the book Genesis and most of Exodus. presents is even stronger than her enthusiasm for the However, subsequent scholars used his extensive notes to finish the gifts, for a material object certainly cannot capture work. Popular to this day, the Mea’am Loez has been translated into the intensity of their relationship. It is an expression many languages, including Hebrew, English, and even Arabic. of his appreciation, and she delights him far more by August 21, 2019 - 20 Av, 5779 receiving and enjoying it than she benefits from its Zohar Published (1558). First printing of the Zohar, the practical use. fundamental work of the Kabbalah (Jewish esoteric and mystical It can be hard to accept gifts, sometimes even earned teachings), authored by the Talmudic sage, Rabbi Shimon Bar rewards. It's awkward. Yet refusal can be insulting. Yochai. How odd: one suggests that another retain his property, and the donor is hurt, even offended. By Passing of R. Levi Yitzchak Schneerson (1944). Av 20 is the accepting the present, one enables the benefactor to yahrtzeit (anniversary of the passing) of the Lubavitcher Rebbe's express himself, to actualize his needs.
Recommended publications
  • Pointing to the Torah and Other Hagbaha Customs
    289 Pointing to the Torah and other Hagbaha Customs By: ZVI RON The idea of displaying the text of the Torah to the listening congre- gation is already found in Tanakh. Before Ezra read to the assem- bled Jews from the Torah scroll, we are told that “Ezra opened the scroll before the eyes of the people … and when he opened it, all the people stood silent. Ezra blessed the Lord God, and all the people answered, ‘Amen! Amen!’ with their hands upraised, then they bowed and prostrated themselves before the Lord, faces to the ground” (Neh. 8:5-6). It is not clear if the showing of the Torah and the reaction of bowing was meant to be a onetime practice or some- thing that would accompany every public Torah reading. Still, this source forms the basis of the idea of displaying the Torah scroll as codified in Masekhet Soferim 14:13.1 Just as reported in Nehemiah, Masekhet Soferim instructs that the Torah is to be shown before the reading, at which time the congregation should bow: “It is a mitz- vah for all the men and women to see the writing, bow and say, ‘This is the Torah that Moses placed before the Children of Israel’ (Deut. 4:44). ‘The Torah of the Lord is perfect, restoring the soul’ (Ps. 19:8).” This source is quoted by Ramban in his discussion of 1 See Morekhai Zer-Kavod, Da‘at Mikra: Ezra v–Nehemia (Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1994), p. 105, note 6. See there also an alternate in- terpretation that the word vayiftah in this verse means “began reading” ra- ther than “opened.” According to that interpretation there was not neces- sarily a public display of the Torah at this event, and the people reacted to hearing the words of the Torah, rather than to seeing the scroll.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Rabbi Yosef Kapach to His Edition of Moses Maimonides
    Introduction of Rabbi Yosef Kapach to his edition of Moses Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah (translated by Michael J. Bohnen) Rabbi Kapach was the foremost editor of the works of Maimonides. Born in Yemen in 1917, he used ancient manuscripts to restore the text of the Mishneh Torah. Several fascinating articles about Rabbi Kapach can be found at www.chayas.com/rabbi.htm The following is a summary and translation of his 20 page Introduction to his edition of the Mishneh Torah. Translator’s Summary My Work. When in my youth I studied the Mishneh Torah with my grandfather of blessed memory, most people used printed books, each with his own edition, but my grandfather and several of the others had manuscripts which were several hundred years old, each scroll of a different age. The errors and deficiencies of the printed texts were well known. The changes that Maimonides made over time in the Commentary on the Mishnah, after completing the Mishneh Torah, he then inserted in the Mishnah Torah. These are all found in our manuscripts, but some are not found in the printed texts. The Jews of Yemen are a conservative group. They would never have presumed to "correct" or "amend" a text that came into their hands, and certainly not the works of Maimonides. However, the Mishneh Torah was subjected to severe editing by the printers and various editors who made emendations of style, language, the structure of sentences and the division of halachot, to the extent that there is hardly any halacha that has not been emended. In this edition of ours, we are publishing, with God’s help, the words of Maimonides in full as we received them from his blessed hand.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Jewish Interpretations of Genesis 38
    "What a breach you have made for yourselfl" The History of Jewish Interpretations of Genesis 38 Maayan Lustigrnan Department of Jewish Studies McGill University, Montreal June 2007 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts. © Maayan Lustigrnan, 2007 Libraryand Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-38458-9 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-38458-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beruriah Incident : Tradition of Exclusion As a Presence of Ethical
    The Beruriah Incident: Tradition of Exclusion as a Presence of Ethical Principles by Itamar Drori * Zusammenfassung Die Geschichte, die als Beruria-Geschehnis bekannt ist und sich in Rashi’s Kommentar zu bAvodah Zarah 18b (dem ATU Typus 920A* und 823A* ähnlich) findet, beschreibt das Scheitern und tragische Ende von R. Meir und seiner Ehefrau Beruria – beide gelten als tannaitische Identifikationsfiguren. In diesem Artikel wird die Authentizität dieser Geschichte untersucht. Dabei wird die Spur ihrer Verbreitung innerhalb der traditionellen jüdischen Gesellschaft vor der Moderne verfolgt. Weiterhin werden ein- zelne Bestandteile der Geschichte mit rabbinischer und internationaler volkstümlicher Literatur verglichen. Abstract The story known as the Beruriah Incident, which appears in Rashi’s commentary on bAvodah Zarah 18b (related to ATU types 920A* and 823A*), describes the failure and tragic end of R. Meir and his wife Beruriah, two tannaic role-models. This article exam- ines the authenticity of the story by tracking the method of distribution in traditional Jewish society before the modern era, and comparing the story’s components with rabbinic literature and international folklore. * Formal aspects of the genealogy of this story reviewed by: Itamar Drori, ‘The Beruriah Incident,’ Encyclopedia of the Jewish Story: Sippur Okev Sippur (Eds. Y. Elstein and A. Lipsker), vol. III (Ramat-Gan, 2013), pp. 115–154 (forthcoming). 100 IItama DItam Introduction R. Meir arose, fled, and came to Babylonia; there are those who say due to this incident, and others who say due to the incident of Beruriah. bAvodah Zarah 18b One time she [Beruriah] mocked that which the sages said: Women are light minded.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Law and the Private Facts Tort
    “THOU SHALT NOT GO ABOUT AS A TALEBEARER AMONG 1 THY PEOPLE” : JEWISH LAW AND THE PRIVATE FACTS TORT INTRODUCTION...................................................................811 I. THE PRIVATE FACTS TORT IN THE UNITED STATES..............813 A. The Creation of the Private Facts Tort ............................813 B. Justifications for the Private Facts Tort ...........................814 C. Questioning the Premise of the Public Facts Tort..............816 D. Free Speech and the Right to Privacy...............................818 II. FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMERICAN AND JEWISH LAW ........................................................................820 A. Law and Morality .........................................................820 B. Judaism and Human Rights..........................................824 C. Judaism and the Right to Free Speech..............................825 III. EVIL SPEECH IN JEWISH LAW ...............................................828 A. Lashon Hara—Introduction ........................................828 B. Lashon Hara—Justifications for the Prohibition............829 C. The Parameters of Lashon Hara (Evil Speech)...............831 D. Modesty vs. Privacy: Jewish Law and Non-Defamatory Disclosures of Private Fact .............834 IV. DAMAGES AND THE PRIVATE FACTS TORT .............................838 A. Jewish Law and Damages for Verbal Harms....................838 CONCLUSION........................................................................841 INTRODUCTION As we begin the twenty-first century,
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval English Rabbis: Image and Self-Image Pinchas Roth
    Medieval English Rabbis: Image and Self-Image Pinchas Roth Early Middle English, Volume 1, Number 1, 2019, pp. 17-33 (Article) Published by Arc Humanities Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/731651 [ Access provided at 2 Oct 2021 13:24 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] MEDIEVAL ENGLISH RABBIS: IMAGE AND SELF-IMAGE PINCHAS ROTH “The neglect of the British situation is explicable largely on the grounds that, compared with other northern, Ashkenazic communities, the Anglo-Jewish community was not perceived to have produced the scholarly superstars so evident in France and Germany.”1 tantalizing about the Jews of medieval England. So much about them is unknown, perhaps unknowable, and even those facts that are well known There is someThing and ostensibly unquestionable have drawn attempts2 There to were bend, no crack, Jewish or communitiesotherwise move in Anglo-Saxonthem. The chronologically England.3 first fact known about this Jewish community is that itHistory came intoof the being Jews onlyin England after the Norman Conquest. 4 The end of the But, medieval as Cecil Anglo-Jewish Roth commented experience on the is first also pageclear—the of his Edict of Expulsion of 1290 did, not“Fantasy allow hasfor any… attempted continued to Jewish carry presencethe story inback England. to a remote5 That hasantiquity.” not stopped various people from believing that Jews continued to live in England for * Boyarin and Shamma Boyarin for their kind invitation and extraordinary hospitality at the University I am deeply of Victoria. grateful to Menachem Butler for his unflagging help, and to Adrienne Williams 1 Patricia Skinner, “Introduction: Jews in Medieval Britain and Europe,” in The Jews in Medieval Britain: Historical, Literary, and Archaeological Perspectives, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • צב | עב January Tevet | Sh’Vat Capricorn Saturn | Aquarius Saturn
    צב | עב January Tevet | Sh’vat Capricorn Saturn | Aquarius Saturn Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 | 17th of Tevet* 2 | 18th of Tevet* New Year’s Day Parashat Vayechi Abraham Moshe Hillel Rabbi Tzvi Elimelech of Dinov Rabbi Salman Mutzfi Rabbi Huna bar Mar Zutra & Rabbi Rabbi Yaakov Krantz Mesharshya bar Pakod Rabbi Moshe Kalfon Ha-Cohen of Jerba 3 | 19th of Tevet * 4* | 20th of Tevet 5 | 21st of Tevet * 6 | 22nd of Tevet* 7 | 23rd of Tevet* 8 | 24th of Tevet* 9 | 25th of Tevet* Parashat Shemot Rabbi Menchachem Mendel Yosef Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon Rabbi Leib Mochiach of Polnoi Rabbi Hillel ben Naphtali Zevi Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi Rabbi Yaakov Abuchatzeira Rabbi Yisrael Dov of Vilednik Rabbi Schulem Moshkovitz Rabbi Naphtali Cohen Miriam Mizrachi Rabbi Shmuel Bornsztain Rabbi Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler 10 | 26th of Tevet* 11 | 27th of Tevet* 12 | 28th of Tevet* 13* | 29th of Tevet 14* | 1st of Sh’vat 15* | 2nd of Sh’vat 16 | 3rd of Sh’vat* Rosh Chodesh Sh’vat Parashat Vaera Rabbeinu Avraham bar Dovid mi Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch HaRav Yitzhak Kaduri Rabbi Meshulam Zusha of Anipoli Posquires Rabbi Yehoshua Yehuda Leib Diskin Rabbi Menahem Mendel ben Rabbi Shlomo Leib Brevda Rabbi Eliyahu Moshe Panigel Abraham Krochmal Rabbi Aryeh Leib Malin 17* | 4th of Sh’vat 18 | 5th of Sh’vat* 19 | 6th of Sh’vat* 20 | 7th of Sh’vat* 21 | 8th of Sh’vat* 22 | 9th of Sh’vat* 23* | 10th of Sh’vat* Parashat Bo Rabbi Yisrael Abuchatzeirah Rabbi Yehudah Aryeh Leib Alter Rabbi Chaim Tzvi Teitelbaum Rabbi Nathan David Rabinowitz
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Repository.Upenn.Edu/Cgi/Vicwcl1ll Reformation Auf Die Rechtsstellung Der Frau Im Protestantismus
    ASCHKENAS Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Kultur der Juden 17. Jg., Heft 2, 2007 Sonderdruck ISBN 978-3-484-98615-2 Max Niemeyer Verlag Tübingen 2010 ASCHKENAS - Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Kultur der Juden 17/2007, H. 2 323 Inhalt 17/2 MARTHAKEIL Aguna (s-dieVerankerte«): Strategien gegen die Themenschwerpunkt: Benachteiligung der jüdischen Frau im Eherecht Strategien gegen Ungleichheiten in Ehe, Recht und Beruf: (1400-1700) Jüdische Frauen im vormodernen Aschkenas (Hg. von ROBERTJÜTTE) In einem seiner Rechtsgutachten schrieb der Rabbiner Menachem Mendel Kroch• mal von Nikolsburg (1600-1661): ROBERTJÜTTE,Strategien gegen Ungleichheiten in Ehe, Recht und Beruf: Jüdische Frauen im vormodernen Aschkenas 315 Der Schrei eines Mädchens drang zu mir, die mit einem jungen Mann verheiratet war, und nach der Hochzeit ging er mit den Soldaten in den Krieg in ferne Länder, um diese MARTHAKEIL, Aguna (vdie Verankerte-s): Strategien gegen die Benachteili- mit Nahrung und Proviant auszustatten. Und er blieb dort lange Zeit, über fünf Jahre, gung der jüdischen Frau im Eherecht (1400-1700) 323 bis sie sich entschloss, ihm nachzufahren, in ein fremdes Land. Und bei ihrem U mher• BIRGIT E. KLEIN, Ungleichheiten als Chance? Jüdinnen und das jüdische wandern fand sie ihn schließlich in einer Stadt in diesem Land [Mähren, M. K.] und sie Ehegüterrecht in Norm und Praxis . .. .. ... .. .. .. 345 bat ihn, bei ihr zu bleiben und nicht mehr in den Krieg zu ziehen oder sie mit einem Scheidebrief zu befreien, denn sie fürchtete, dass ihr Ehemann im Krieg getötet werden BARBARASTAUDINGER,Ungleichheiten als Chance? Hof jüdinnen als Kauf- könnte oder an einem Ort sterben würde, wo man seinen Tod nicht würde bezeugen frauen 385 können, und sie für immer eine Aguna bliebe.
    [Show full text]
  • Terumah Vol.27 No.19:Layout 1
    ,runv vacug s; Volume 27 No. 19 TERUMAH Daf Hashavua 21 February 2015 • 2 Adar 5775 Shabbat ends in London at 6.13 pm Artscroll p.444 • Hertz p.325 • Soncino p.500 Journeys with The Book of Judges (Shofetim) Chapter 15 the Prophets: by Rabbi Dr Moshe Freedman, Northwood United Synagogue Part 19 Summary: Shimshon (Samson) returned to his it in order to curse Israel, he had only been father-in-law’s house to take back his able to offer blessings (Bemidbar 23-24). This Philistine wife, only to be told that she had is why Shimshon now came across its jawbone been given away to another man. Out of to kill the Philistines. vengeance, he caught 300 foxes, attached Rabbi Moshe Dovid Valle (d. 1777) explains torches to their tails and let them loose in the the deeper significance of why the jawbone of fields of the Philistines to the donkey was specifi- burn down their crops. cally used. Shimshon’s This caused a chain strength was not natural; reaction of events. it came on account of his A Deeper Look: Shim- relationship with G-d and shon’s marriage to the could not be subdued by woman from Timnah and mere ropes or chains. her subsequent infidel- We reinforce our con- ity created the perfect nection to G-d through excuse to take revenge learning Torah, using our against the Philistines. own jaws by articulating The Philistines blamed Shimshon’s wayward the words with speech. Similarly, Rashi wife and her father for Shimshon’s anger (d.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BA'alei TOSAFOS of GERMANY 12Th
    THE BA’ALEI TOSAFOS OF GERMANY 12th - 13th CENTURIES The history of Jewry in Germany is closely bound with that of France. The cultural ties between the French and German Jewish communities existed for centuries. Travel seems not to have been hampered between the academies of the two countries, even during the Crusades. The development of the French Tosafists academies, with their unique approach to Talmudic studies, was paralleled in Germany, although the work of the German scholars has come down to us in a different form from that of the French school. Where the thoughts of the French scholars exist for us largely in the collection of Tosafos, the German scholars’ words have come down to us in a more individualized form - in halachic works of individual authors. These works differ from the French Tosafists not only in individualization, but in content and purpose as well. The goal of Tosafos is the elucidation of the Talmudic texts per se, without attempting to apply the implications of their studies to practical halacha. However, the main thrust of the works of the German school is halachic application. To the German scholars, the Tosafist method was a vehicle to arrive at halachic conclusions relating to practical questions of law. The father of the German Tosafists was R. Yitzchak ben Asher I (d.1133), known as the Riva. The Riva studied in Mainz, and later became a pupil of Rashi. After ​ spending a few years as a merchant, which sometimes involved business trips that took him as far as Russia, he repaired to Speyer where he gathered many disciples who later became the leaders of German Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • Shabbat Shalom
    " SHABBAT SHALOM. Today is 2 Adar 5775. then soldered together. The other utensils such as the Menorah and Shulchan could be duplicated, and in fact were so in the construction of the Holy Temple, but not the TORAH DIALOGUE cherubim. Only one set was permitted to be made and (p. 326 Hz) (p. 500 S) (p. 306 Hi) (p. 444 AS) attached to the Ark. There was one cherub on each side of TERUMAH the Ark cover and they would have wings spread upward, above their heads. This made a very long and large Exodus 25:1 [Compiled by Rabbi Edward Davis (RED) wingspan. The upward reach of the wings would indicate Young Israel of Hollywood-Ft. Lauderdale] the striving toward Heaven that human beings would make. Even though it has tremendous meaning and significance for the Jewish people, the Jewish people never saw these 1. This sidrah begins with a lengthy description of the cherubim because they were in the Holy of Holies which Mishkan/Tabernacle and the utensils. The last five sidrahs was not in public view. Even the High Priest, the Kohen of this Chumash are primarily dedicated to the Gadol, never entered these premises except for on Yom commandment of the construction of the Mishkan, and the Kippur. But the knowledge of their existence is supposed to Kohen’s vestments. However we understand the opinions be in our minds all the time even when we eat and drink of the Rabbis regarding whether the commandment to build and occupy ourselves in business. We should be forever the Mishkan precedes the sin of the Golden Calf or not, it is striving to look upon the Almighty for guidance and clear that there is a connection between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitniyot on Pesah – Are They Really Forbidden?
    Rice, beans and kitniyot on Pesah – are they really forbidden? By Rabbi David Golinkin The following responsum was approved by the CJLS on December, 24 2015 by a vote of fifteen in favor, three opposed, and four abstaining (15-3-4). Voting for: Rabbis Kassel Abelson, Pamela Barmash, David Booth, Elliot Dorff, Susan Grossman, Reuven Hammer, Joshua Heller, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Adam Kligfeld, Gail Labovitz, Jonathan Lubliner, Daniel Nevins, Paul Plotkin, Elie Spitz, and Jay Stein. Voting against: Rabbis Amy Levin, Micah Peltz, and Avram Reisner. Abstaining: Rabbis Aaron Alexander, Miriam Berkowitz, Baruch Frydman-Kohl, and Noah Bickart This responsum was originally written in Hebrew for the Va'ad Halakhah of the Rabbinical Assembly of Israel in 1989 and published in the Responsa of the Va'ad Halakhah 3 (5748- 5749), pp. 35-55 (which can be accessed at www.responsafortoday.com/vol3/4.pdf). It was aimed at Israel where hundreds of products are labeled "Kosher for Pesah for those who eat Kitniyot" and where many Ashkenazim marry Sephardim. This revised translation is addressed to all Jews. In this version, we have added some new sources and references, but we have also abbreviated some sections by referring to the Hebrew original. Since this responsum is quite lengthy, I have included a brief summary at the beginning. DG * * * * * Question: Why do Ashkanazic Jews refrain from eating rice, beans and kitniyot on Pesah? Is there any way of doing away with this custom which causes much hardship and also divides Jewish communities and even members of the same family? A Brief Summary of the Responsum: 1) In our opinion it is permitted (and perhaps even obligatory) to eliminate this custom.
    [Show full text]