DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 of 6 11/06/2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 of 6 11/06/2018 Page 1 of 6 List Entry Summary (Published) This garden or other land is registered under the Historic Buildings and Ancient Monuments Act 1953 within the Register of Historic Parks and Gardens by English Heritage for its special historic interest. Name: Parlington Estate List Entry Number: 1447854 Location Aberford, Leeds, West Yorkshire The garden or other land may lie within the boundary of more than one authority. County District District Type Parish Leeds Metropolitan Authority Aberford Barwick in Elmet and Leeds Metropolitan Authority Scholes Leeds Metropolitan Authority Parlington National Park: Not applicable to this List entry. Grade: II Date first registered: 21-Sep-2017 Date of most recent amendment: Not applicable to this List entry. Asset Groupings This list entry does not comprise part of an Asset Grouping. Asset Groupings are not part of the official record but are added later for information. List Entry Description Summary of Garden Country estate developed by the Gascoigne family mainly in the C18, with C19 and C20 additions and alterations Reasons for Designation Parlington Estate is registered at Grade II for the following principal reasons: * Historic interest: it is a good example of a designed landscape laid out largely in the late C18 with distinct areas and features that directly reflect the ideas, philosophies and interests of its owner and also that of a notable estate gardener; * Designers: it is largely the work of Sir Thomas Gascoigne, a significant figure in C18 agricultural reform, and his estate gardener John Kennedy, a key figure in the development of horticulture, cultivation and agriculture in the C18 who brought the estate and Gascoigne international recognition through his pioneering planting methods; * Design interest: it is a landscape designed equally for pleasure, agriculture and industry that incorporated fashionable C18 features, but also enabled agrarian and horticultural experimentation, facilitated the exploitation of the estate's mineral resources, and indulged the Gascoigne passion for racehorse breeding; * Survival: despite some later alteration the landscape's late-C18 and early-C19 development, layout and views remain clearly readable and legible in the surviving landscape, which includes notable survivals, such as a hidden former wagonway with associated bridge and tunnel used to transport the family's coal through the estate, and rare impressively-scaled late-C18 stallion pens; * Group value: it has strong group value with listed features on the estate, including the Triumphal Arch (Grade II*), Gardens House and attached walls (Grade II), shelter in the north-east parkland (Grade II), Hookmoor Lodges (Grade II), The Cottage (Grade II), and Park House Farmhouse (Grade II). History The history of the Parlington estate is intertwined with that of the Gascoignes, a family of Catholic landed gentry based in Yorkshire. Land at Parlington, including the medieval village of Parlington and probably also a manorial complex, was bought by John http://swnhpr03 -c1/EH.UDS.Web.UIElements/article_heritageasset.aspx?useAv=1& ... 11/ 06/ 2018 Page 2 of 6 Gascoigne (1520-1602) from Thomas Lord Wentworth in March 1545. The remains of the village are believed to have been removed in the C18 when the landscape was gentrified and mineral extraction was also exploited. Parlington became the seat of the Gascoignes in the early 1720s when they moved from nearby Barnbow Hall (now demolished). Parlington Hall (now - 2017 - largely demolished) is believed to have been remodelled in the 1730s for Sir Edward Gascoigne (1697- 1750), and again in around 1800 for his son Sir Thomas when an east wing was added. Sir Edward's accounts reveal that a deer park was created in the late 1730s, and a deer herd remained at the estate up until the Second World War. Also in the 1730s, stone from the estate quarries was used to build the Assembly Rooms in York and Sir Edward provided stone for restoration work at York Minster gratis. Sir Thomas Gascoigne (1745-1810), who was born and raised in Cambrai, northern France and was the youngest son of Sir Edward and Mary Gascoigne, inherited the Parlington estate in 1762 after his elder brother's sudden death. He settled in England in 1765, interspersing his residence with two Grand Tours where he mixed in court society, including with Marie Antoinette and Charles III, King of Spain. In 1780 Gascoigne abjured his Catholic faith to become an Anglican and a Member of Parliament, becoming a close ally of the Marquis of Rockingham. However, in 1784 Sir Thomas married Lady Mary Turner, a widow with two young children, and he resigned from politics to concentrate on his family and improving the Parlington estate, although he returned to politics several years later following Mary's early death from childbirth complications. Sir Thomas was an advocate of agricultural reform like his father Sir Edward, and a coal mine and quarry owner interested in developing technologies and innovation. He also had a keen interest in horse racing and breeding, developing a stud at Parlington. His horse Tuberose won the Doncaster Cup in 1776, Hollandaise won the St Leger in 1778, followed later by Symmetry who won in 1798, and Theophania won the Epsom Oaks in 1803. The Gascoigne Stakes were also run at Doncaster in the early C19. Gascoigne was elected Honorary Member of the Board of Agriculture in 1796 and his expertise and opinions on agricultural reform were sought by the board and his contemporaries. New parkland was created in the early 1760s (presumably altering the earlier deer park) whilst Sir Thomas was away on his first Grand Tour and was overseen by one of his guardians Stephen Tempest, as recorded in letters between Tempest and Gascoigne. In 1771 Sir Thomas employed the gardener John Kennedy (1719-1790) who had been employed and recommended by Gascoigne's brother-in-law William Salvin of Croxdale Hall, County Durham. Kennedy was from a notable family of C18 gardeners and horticulturalists and in 1776 he published an account of the aboricultural methods he employed at Parlington in a book entitled 'A Treatise Upon Planting, Gardening, and the Management of the Hot-House' where he pioneered new techniques, such as the use of artificial fertilisers. The book sold to subscribers including members of the peerage and earned the estate an international reputation for pioneering techniques in cultivation and agriculture. Some of the methods pioneered by Kennedy were employed by Thomas Blaikie, the gardener to the Comte d'Artois at the Chateau de Bagatelle in the Bois de Boulogne, northern France, and the methods employed at Parlington were discussed in the North American 'The Farmer's Almanac' of 1794. One of Kennedy's specialisms was trees and woodland, and he planted and developed a considerable amount of woodland at Parlington, which was not only a valuable resource, but also a symbol of patriotism for Gascoigne, with some of the wood specifically grown for the Royal Navy. Letters sent by Jarrard Strickland to Sir Thomas reveal that the estate was visited by 'garden seers' (garden tourists) in the late C18 who came to view the landscape. Sir Thomas Gascoigne died in 1810 shortly after his only son and heir, Thomas Charles (1786-1809) had died in a hunting accident. The estate subsequently passed to his step-daughter Mary (c1783-1819) who had married Captain Richard Oliver (1762-1842); her husband taking the name Gascoigne as stipulated by Sir Thomas' will. Richard Oliver Gascoigne maintained the estate's agricultural and horse racing interests developed by Sir Thomas at Parlington: Richard's horse Soothsayer won the St Leger in 1811 and his horse Jerry won in 1824. Gascoigne also built new stables in 1813 to the designs of Watson & Pritchett of York (now demolished). He also further developed mineral assets on the estate, constructing the Dark Arch in 1813 on the coal wagonway of Parlington Lane that cut through the estate just to the south of the hall. Two different designs for a mansion house were produced by W Pilkington for Richard Oliver Gascoigne in 1810, suggesting that Gascoigne was clearly thinking about constructing a new house at this time. However, the plans were not carried out and the existing house was instead altered and extended at some point in the mid-1810s by Watson & Pritchett of York. Watson & Pritchett also produced a number of designs for other buildings on the estate from 1813 to 1815 for Gascoigne, including stables (now demolished), dog kennels (now demolished) and a gamekeeper's house. Richard Oliver's two sons Thomas and Richard pre-deceased him and thus upon his death his two daughters Mary Isabella (1810- 1891) and Elizabeth (1812-1893) inherited. Mary Isabella and her husband lived at Parlington, and Elizabeth and her husband lived at the family's other estate, Castle Oliver in County Limerick, Ireland. The sisters created an ornamental lake (now drained) in the woodland of Parlington Hollins in the mid-C19, and were also involved with philanthropic projects in the local area, constructing almshouses on Bunkers Hill in Aberford (1843-1845, Grade II*). After the death of his parents Parlington passed to Isabella's son Colonel Frederick Richard Thomas Trench-Gascoigne in 1905. Frederick, who had already inherited nearby Lotherton Hall from his aunt Elizabeth and had made that his family residence, focused on a military career, leaving the running of the Parlington estate to employees. Frederick removed many of the contents from the hall, along with a number of architectural features, including the hall's porte cochère, which became a garden feature at Lotherton. Parlington Hall was subsequently abandoned and in 1919 the estate's mines were sold. During the Second World War the Parlington estate was occupied by the Royal Army Ordnance Corps No 3 Vehicle Reserve Depot and a number of temporary buildings were constructed, all of which have since been demolished, but tank inspection ramps survive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aberford and Parlington Estate 2
    ABERFORD, BECCA BANKS and PARLINGTON ESTATE A fairly easy going 3.5 mile walk involving 2 short hills and 2 stiles (can be muddy around Leyfield Farm). Start point: Cock Beck Bridge, Aberford. LS25 3AA A map for this walk can be obtained by using the following link:- http://www.walk4life.info/walk/harrys-walks-aberford-becca-banks-parlington See NOTE 1 for detailed history Walk: From Cock Beck Bridge, walk away from the beck passing the Arabian Horse public house on your right to take the first lane on your left, opposite a public bridleway sign. Continue along the lane passing cottages on your left and then Becca Bank Villas. 200 yards further on, turn left into a wood along a ‘permissive footpath’. Carry along this distinctive path as it winds its way through the wood eventually arriving below Becca Bank Crag on your right. See NOTE 2 Continue following the path, through the wood to eventually emerge on to the lane that you left a while back. At this point, turn left continuing to walk along the road for about ½ a mile where Becca Hall eventually comes into view. See NOTE3. Before you reach the hall, turn left at a post which says ‘no public right of way’ and within 100 yards on reaching a footpath sign by a wood, turn left through a gate to follow the sign to Parlington. Now continue down a wide track through the wood and at the bottom, on reaching a field, bear slight right along the top of a field with a row of trees on your right.
    [Show full text]
  • PNW00358 Outer North East MX2-39
    Ref: PNW00358 HMCA\Topic: Outer North East Subject: Site in the plan Site: MX2-39 - Parlington Estate, Aberford Agree with proposed use? No Soundness Consider the plan sound? No Test of soundness addressed: Positively prepared Effective Justified Consistent with NPPF Changes required to make sound: The development is much too big for the current environment and not in keeping with the controlled expansion of villages and towns. This is not a village, but a new town! The site should be considered as an area of natural beauty and developed as a country park widening the usuage for the whole city of leeds. Issues Issue: Other - Local Character Local Character of the two small villages of Aberford and Barwick in Elmet with their unique identities and traditions are in danger of being destroyed by being amalgamated into one giant development in the future. Issue: Site boundary The site boundary encompasses most of the Parlington Civil Parish. It is massively too big dwarfing the two local villages or Aberford and Barwick In Elmet. The result of which may lead to one large conurbation in the future. Issue: Highways and transport the highway infrastructure in the area is totally inadequate to accommodate an additional 5,000 or more cars (or even 10,000 cars) and their average daily vehicle movements (25,000). The existing traffic volumes from Barwick, Aberford and the neighbouring villages already swamp the narrow and weight- limited bridges. The low and narrow rail bridge at Barwick Road, Garforth and the inadequate Town End junction in Garforth, where accidents and congestions occur frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds Site Allocation Plan (Sap) Revised Publication Draft Section 3: Area Proposals: 6
    LEEDS SITE ALLOCATION PLAN (SAP) REVISED PUBLICATION DRAFT SECTION 3: AREA PROPOSALS: 6. OUTER NORTH EAST REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF ABERFORD AND DISTRICT PARISH COUNCIL INTRODUCTION Please find set out in this letter our detailed comments in support of the enclosed completed forms relating to the Council’s proposed allocation of land at Parlington Estate, Aberford under reference MX2-39. The comments are being submitted on behalf of Aberford and District Parish Council which is gravely concerned by the nature and scale of the allocation. As a result, the Parish Council wish to object to the allocation of the site. SOUNDNESS AND CONFORMITY OVERVIEW The majority of the objection below is set out on the basis of a wide range of specific considerations, but overall, the allocation of MX2-39 is considered to be unsound on the following grounds:- Unjustified given the level of harm that the proposal would cause; Not based on a robust and credible evidence base that actually justifies the harm to be caused; An unreliable evidence base which includes inaccuracies such as the extent of public rights of way crossing the land and omits key information on archaeology and flood risk; Not the most appropriate strategy when considered against the alternatives, because of the harm that will be caused by development, relative to the alternative sites available that are more sequentially preferable. The strategy will also not support the settlement of Wetherby in accordance with the Core Strategy which places Wetherby at the heart of the Outer North East (ONE) Housing Market Character Area (HMCA); The Site Allocations Plan (SAP) will not be effective because it will not deliver appropriate development; It will also not be deliverable because it has not been demonstrated that mitigation can be delivered; and It is not consistent with the NPPF which aims to protect against harm.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER ISSUE 43 Autumn 2018 Snowdrop Walk at Bridge Farm House Saturday 24 February 2018
    YORKSHIRE GARDENS TRUST NEWSLETTER ISSUE 43 Autumn 2018 Snowdrop Walk at Bridge Farm House Saturday 24 February 2018 Snowdrops and companion planting at Bridge Farm House. Image: Jim Godfrey Saturday 24 February was a sunny cold morning at Great Heck. Inside This Issue There was horizon in every direction but happily no wind. We Gardens & Visits Page were between the highways of the past and the present. On one AGM & Rudding Park 5 side the Aire and Calder canal, on another the main North East Book launch & Repton lecture 22 rail line and on the third the M62. Several centuries of transport. Lotherton Hall & Parlington 14 Members parked in a grassy field, firm underfoot, the season Midsummer Picnic 2016 18 begins. Rokeby Park 25 We arrived for snowdrop viewing at Bridge Farm and, having Snowdrops Visit 1 filled the house, we were regaled, as people once said, with tea, coffee and cake. Much enjoyed and just right for a cold day. Our Groups’ News hosts, Barbara and Richard Ferrari, welcomed us and gave us an Conservation & Planning 11 introduction to the garden and the snowdrop collection. In this Research & Recording 20 partnership Barbara is plants and Richard is maintenance, he Schools’ News 17 says. A project of just 15 years but a garden of about 2 acres Small Grants Scheme 10 with an emphasis on a snowdrop collection of about 200. We walked out into the sun and immediately were looking down Other Items a long vista hedged on three sides and with borders on either Bloom! York 27-28 side.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds Site Allocations Plan
    LEEDS SITE ALLOCATIONS PLAN ISSUES AND OPTIONS FOR THE PLAN DRAFT April 2013 VOLUME 2: SITE PROPOSALS FOR EACH HOUSING MARKET CHARACTERISTIC AREA 6. OUTER NORTH EAST 1 Page 401 VOLUME 2: SITE PROPOSALS FOR EACH HOUSING MARKET CHARACTERISTIC AREA: 6. OUTER NORTH EAST CONTENTS: PAGE: 6.1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 6.2.0 RETAIL ISSUES AND OPTIONS: 3 - 5 6.3.0 HOUSING ISSUES AND OPTIONS: 6 - 24 6.4.0 EMPLOYMENT ISSUES AND OPTIONS: 25 - 28 6.5.0 GREENSPACE ISSUES AND OPTIONS: 29 - 33 PLANS: RETAIL: OUTER NORTH EAST PLAN 6.2A Boston Spa Higher Order Local Centre PLAN 6.2B Collingham Lower Order Local Centre PLAN 6.2C Slaid Hill Lower Order Local Centre PLAN 6.2D Wetherby Town Centre PLAN 6.2E Plan showing all centres and ‘call for sites’ submissions HOUSING: OUTER NORTH EAST PLAN 6.3 Housing EMPLOYMENT: OUTER NORTH EAST PLAN 6.4 Employment GREENSPACE: OUTER NORTH EAST PLAN 6.5A UDP Greenspace allocations and open space audit sites PLAN 6.5B Types of Greenspace 2 Page 402 6.1.0 INTRODUCTION 6.1.1 Volume 1 of the Site Allocations Plan Issues and Options sets out the approach and an overview for each topic which will be included in the final Site Allocations Plan. The plan will cover Retail, Housing, Employment and Greenspace allocations. Please see Volume 1 in conjunction with the area proposals for a full understanding of the context and work involved in producing the Issues and Options for the plan. 6.1.2 Plans for initial proposals for retail, housing, employment and greenspace are at the end of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • PNW00352 Outer North East MX2-39
    Ref: PNW00352 HMCA\Topic: Outer North East Subject: Site in the plan Site: MX2-39 - Parlington Estate, Aberford Agree with proposed use? No Soundness Consider the plan sound? No Test of soundness addressed: Positively prepared Effective Justified Consistent with NPPF Changes required to make sound: 1) drastic reduction in the number of houses built. 2) to adhere to the agreed guidelines of not building on green belt land. 3) change of location to one of significantly lower environmental and heritage value and lower flood risk to surronding villages. Issues Issue: Other - Flood Risk I believe that it is important to learn from some of the contributing factors in recent local flooding events including most notably the damaging impact of the floods In winter 2015 upon the town of Hebden Bridge. One of the key components in this disaster was the removal of upstream woodland, leading to a significant reduction in the levels of water being naturally absorbed subsequently causing the water to run straight down into the town. This was in stark contrast to the town of Pickering which having suffered been flooded four times between 1999 and 2007, the last disaster costing £7 million of damage (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-flooding-how-a-yorkshire-flood-blackspot-worked-with-nature-to-stay-dry-a6794286.html). One of the major implementations was the planting of 29 hectares of woodland as part of the natural defences which helped slowed the flow of water and prevented flooding. Since its implementation Pickering has not suffered from flooding. These events are highly suggestive that natural flood defences, including the woodland, arable land and flood plains found in Parlington estate are the most effective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Leeds
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF LEEDS Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the city of Leeds March 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 WETHERBY CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. WALTON CP Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2017. Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background THORP ARCH CP may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. COLLINGHAM CP BO STO N SPA CP WETHERBY OTLEY CP EAST KESWICK CP POOL CP ARTHINGTON CP CLIFFORD CP HAREWOOD CP OTLEY & YEADON BARDSEY CUM RIGTON CP BRAMHOPE CP CARLTON CP WOTHERSOME CP BRAMHAM CUM OGLETHORPE CP ADEL & WHARFEDALE GUISELEY & RAWDON ALWOODLEY CP SCARCROFT CP HAREWOOD ALWOODLEY THORNER CP SHADWELL CP RAWDON CP ABERFORD CP HORSFORTH HORSFORTH CP WEETWOOD MOORTOWN BARWICK IN ELMET AND SCHOLES CP ROUNDHAY CHAPEL ALLERTON LOTHERTON CUM ABERFORD CP KIRKSTALL PARLINGTON CP HEADINGLEY & KILLINGBECK & CROSS GATES HYDE PARK SEACROFT & WHINMOOR CALVERLEY & FARSLEY BRAMLEY & STANNINGLEY GIPTON & HAREHILLS LITTLE LONDON & WOODHOUSE ARMLEY STURTON GRANGE CP AUSTHORPE CP MICKLEFIELD CP PUDSEY TEMPLE NEWSAM BURMANTOFTS & RICHMOND HILL GARFORTH & FARNLEY & WORTLEY SWILLINGTON HUNSLET & BEESTON & RIVERSIDE HOLBECK SWILLINGTON CP KIPPAX CP GREAT AND LITTLE PRESTON CP LEDSTON CP LEDSHAM CP GILDERSOME CP KIPPAX & METHLEY MORLEY NORTH DRIGHLINGTON CP MIDDLETON PARK ALLERTON BYWATER CP ROTHWELL MORLEY CP MORLEY SOUTH ARDSLEY & ROBIN HOOD KEY CITY COUNCIL BOUNDARY 00.75 1.5 3 PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH PARISH BOUNDARY PUDSEY PROPOSED WARD NAME Kilometres PARLINGTON CP PARISH NAME 1 cm = 0.3525 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberford and District Village Design Statement 2013
    ABERFORD AND DISTRICT VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT 2013 1 | P a g e “Our Vision is for Aberford and District to provide opportunity for all to live, work and play in an environment which is safe, healthy and attractive. Our parish can and should provide opportunities for local people to find housing, find employment and access opportunities for education, recreation and community activities, while maintaining the essential rural character of the parish and surrounding countryside.” Aberford & District Parish Council, 2011 2 | P a g e CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCING OUR VDS..................................................5 2. A BRIEF HISTORY OF ABERFORD......................................9 3. CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT.............................14 4. OUR COUNTRYSIDE SETTING.........................................16 5. ROADS AND RIGHTS OF WAY.........................................25 6. BUSINESS AND TOURISM...............................................34 7. CHARACTER AREAS........................................................37 8. MANAGEMENT PLAN.....................................................48 9. DESIGN POLICIES AND GUIDANCE.................................50 Appendix 1 – Relevant Planning Policies...............................56 Appendix 2 – Designated Features....................................... 61 Appendix 3 – Householder Survey........................................65 Appendix 4 – Unitary Development Plan 2006 map............. 67 Appendix 5 – Tree Preservation Orders................................68 Appendix 6 – Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Leeds
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Leeds Report to The Electoral Commission July 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 344 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 15 3 Draft recommendations 19 4 Responses to consultation 21 5 Analysis and final recommendations 25 6 What happens next? 73 Appendices A Final recommendations for Leeds: detailed mapping 75 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 77 C First draft of the electoral change Order for Leeds 79 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • 64 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    64 bus time schedule & line map 64 Leeds - Aberford Old Cafe View In Website Mode The 64 bus line (Leeds - Aberford Old Cafe) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Aberford <-> Leeds: 7:15 PM (2) Aberford <-> Leeds City Centre: 8:37 PM - 10:37 PM (3) Leeds <-> Aberford: 7:51 AM - 10:47 PM (4) Leeds City Centre <-> Aberford: 6:09 AM - 10:42 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 64 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 64 bus arriving. Direction: Aberford <-> Leeds 64 bus Time Schedule 52 stops Aberford <-> Leeds Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 8:42 AM - 10:42 PM Monday 7:15 PM Old Cafe Terminus, Aberford Main Street, Aberford Civil Parish Tuesday 7:15 PM Main St Haverthwaite Drive, Aberford Wednesday 7:15 PM Main Street St Johns Close, Aberford Thursday 7:15 PM Friday 7:15 PM Main St Highƒeld Road, Aberford Saturday Not Operational Cattle Lane Main St, Aberford Cattle Lane Parlington Villas, Aberford Parlington Villas, Aberford Civil Parish 64 bus Info Leyƒeld Farm, Aberford Direction: Aberford <-> Leeds Stops: 52 Cattle Ln Barwick Lodge Plantation, Barwick-In- Trip Duration: 48 min Elmet Line Summary: Old Cafe Terminus, Aberford, Main St Haverthwaite Drive, Aberford, Main Street St Johns Aberford Road Fieldhead Dr, Barwick-In-Elmet Close, Aberford, Main St Highƒeld Road, Aberford, Cattle Lane Main St, Aberford, Cattle Lane Parlington Gascoigne Arms the Cross, Barwick-In-Elmet Villas, Aberford, Leyƒeld Farm, Aberford, Cattle Ln Barwick Lodge Plantation, Barwick-In-Elmet, The Cross,
    [Show full text]
  • Save Parlington Actiongroup
    SAVE PARLINGTON ACTION GROUP RESPONSE TO INSPECTORS MATTERS, ISSUES AND QUESTIONS LEEDS SITE ALLOCATIONS PLAN EXAMINATION MATTER 5A – M5.7.2 Matter 5A – Revised Submission SAP Infrastructure Issue: Whether the necessary infrastructure will be in place to support the planned development 1. Question 1: For sites which have been brought forward in to Phase 1 in the Revised Submission SAP does the evidence demonstrate that the necessary critical infrastructure will be provided in a timely manner to support the planned delivery of development? (See Appendix 1 for relevant sites). 1.1 SPAG has reviewed the critical local and strategic infrastructure needed in order for the Parlington site to be a successful location for residential accommodation. As there is minimal infrastructure currently, and possibly no infrastructure useful to the delivery of the allocation, implementing the requisite infrastructure will be a complex and difficult process. 1.2 There is little evidence that demonstrates that the critical infrastructure will be provided in a timely manner to support the planned delivery of development of the Parlington site MX2-39. 1.3 Indeed, delivery is unlikely to occur in time for the first occupied dwelling; our comments supporting this statement are below. 1.4 Infrastructure delivery – site specific plans - In LCC’s Background Paper (CD1/35), page 10, point 1.10 the document states that the “most appropriate sites for SAP and AVLAAP allocations have been proposed having regard to planning, highways, environmental and other considerations. The site selection process has been informed by the consultee comments of infrastructure providers or technical planning consultees. Some allocations contain site specific requirements relating to infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • (West Yorkshire)………
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF WEST YORKSHIRE THE CITY OF LEEDS Boundaries with:- HARROGATE & SELBY (NORTH YORKSHIRE) HARROGATE BRADFORD SELBY REPORT NO.606 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO 606 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton MEMBERS Mr K F J Ennals Mr G Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr C W Smith Professor K Young THE RT HON MICHAEL HESELTINE MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF WEST YORKSHIRE THE CITY OF LEEDS AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH HARROGATE AND SELBY IN NORTH YORKSHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT INTRODUCTION 1. On 1 September 1987 we wrote to Leeds city Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of Leeds as part of our review of the Metropolitan County of West Yorkshire and its Metropolitan Districts under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to the adjoining Metropolitan District Councils; the County and District Councils bordering the Metropolitan County; Parish Councils in the adjoining districts; the Local Authority Associations; Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities and statutory undertakers which might have an interest, as well as to the English Tourist Board, the local- press, and the local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The Metropolitan District Councils were requested, in co-operation as necessary with the other principal authorities, to assist us in publishing the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers, so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]