Primary Record Number 539 MONUMENT DETAILS Common Name Roman Road 28B, Parlington
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Boundary Committee for England Periodic Electoral Review of Leeds
K ROAD BARWIC School School Def School STANKS R I School N G R O A D PARLINGTON CP C R O PARKLANDS S S G A T E S HAREWOOD WARD KILLINGBECK AND School PENDA'S FIELDS SEACROFT WARD MANSTON CROSS GATES AND WHINMOOR WARD D A O BARWICK IN ELMET AND R Def D R O SCHOLES CP F R E Def B A CROSS GATES ROAD U n S T d A T I O Barnbow Common N R School O A D Seacroft Hospital Def A 6 5 6 2 4 6 A f De R IN G R O A D H A Def L A T U O S N T H O R P E GRAVELEYTHORPE L A N E U f nd e D N EW HO LD NE LA IRK ITK Elmfield WH nd Business U Park Newhold Industrial Estate E Recreation AN AUSTHORPE Y L Ground WB RO BAR School f e School STURTON GRANGE CP D A 6 5 WHITKIRK LANE END AUSTHORPE WEST 6 PARISH WARD AUSTHORPE CP MOOR GARFORTH School EAST GARFORTH The Oval f AUSTHORPE EAST e D PARISH WARD SE School LB Y RO AD f e D Recreation Football Ground Ground Cricket Ground f e D Swillington Common COLTON School CHURCH GARFORTH School Cricket Ground Allotment Gardens LIDGETT f e D School GARFORTH TEMPLE NEWSAM WARD Schools Swillington Common U D A n College O d R m a s a N n w A e e r M n A O le s B t p r R U m o P e p L T S L E C R T H OR D P L E L E A WEST I N E GARFORTH F E L K C I M SE LB Y R O D AD e f A 63 Hollinthorpe Hollinthorpe 6 5 D 6 e A A 63 f A LE ED S School RO A D D i s m a n t le d R a il w a y K ip p a x B e c k Def SWILLINGTON CP Kippax Common Recreation Ground Ledston Newsam GARFORTH AND SWILLINGTON WARD Luck Green Swillington School School Kippax School Allotment Gardens School D A O R E G D I R Allotment Sports Ground Gardens Sports Grounds -
Establishment of a Parish Council for Rawdon
Community Governance Review Establishment of a Parish Council for Rawdon Information pack for Electoral Working Group Tuesday 21 August 2012 Electoral Services Level 2 Town Hall The Headrow Leeds LS1 3AD 0113 3952858 [email protected] www.leeds.gov.uk/elections 1 Contents Item Page Number • Map of the proposed Rawdon Parish Council area 3 • Details of current arrangements relating to community 4 - 5 engagement or representation • Details of developments 6 • Demographic information 7 • Electorate 8 • Potential effects of Boundary Commission’s review 9 • Precept 10 - 13 • Transfer of land and property 14 • Summary of representations 15 • Details of representations 16 - 32 • Electoral arrangements o Proposal from Cllr Collins 33 o Officer recommendations 33 – 35 • Appendix A - Directory of Parish/Town Clerks 2012 36 – 41 • Appendix B - Revised Rawdon Parish Council Boundary Map 42 • Appendix C - Map showing split of Polling District GRG 43 2 Map of the proposed Rawdon Parish Council area 3 Current arrangements relating to community engagement / representation Organisation Purpose Rawdon Billing Action Group Joan Roberts - Treasurer 27 Billing View LS19 6PR 0113 2509843 [email protected] Opposing development and protecting greenbelt status on Rawdon Billing and Diana Al- Saadi - Secretary associated land. 15 Billing View LS19 6PR` 0113 2100154 [email protected] Janet Bennett—Chairman Area Committees aim to improve the delivery and co-ordination of local council services and improve the quality of local decision making. -
Aberford and Parlington Estate 2
ABERFORD, BECCA BANKS and PARLINGTON ESTATE A fairly easy going 3.5 mile walk involving 2 short hills and 2 stiles (can be muddy around Leyfield Farm). Start point: Cock Beck Bridge, Aberford. LS25 3AA A map for this walk can be obtained by using the following link:- http://www.walk4life.info/walk/harrys-walks-aberford-becca-banks-parlington See NOTE 1 for detailed history Walk: From Cock Beck Bridge, walk away from the beck passing the Arabian Horse public house on your right to take the first lane on your left, opposite a public bridleway sign. Continue along the lane passing cottages on your left and then Becca Bank Villas. 200 yards further on, turn left into a wood along a ‘permissive footpath’. Carry along this distinctive path as it winds its way through the wood eventually arriving below Becca Bank Crag on your right. See NOTE 2 Continue following the path, through the wood to eventually emerge on to the lane that you left a while back. At this point, turn left continuing to walk along the road for about ½ a mile where Becca Hall eventually comes into view. See NOTE3. Before you reach the hall, turn left at a post which says ‘no public right of way’ and within 100 yards on reaching a footpath sign by a wood, turn left through a gate to follow the sign to Parlington. Now continue down a wide track through the wood and at the bottom, on reaching a field, bear slight right along the top of a field with a row of trees on your right. -
Mines and Minerals Rights Relating to HG2-124 and BL1-40
Leeds Revised Submission Site Allocation Plan (SAP) Matter 7, Agenda Item 4 – Mines and Minerals Rights relating to HG2-124 and BL1-40 Position Statement between: (1) BDW Homes and Taylor Wimpey ("BDW/TW") (2) Mr Christopher Makin (3) Leeds City Council ("LCC") Introduction 1 At the close of the Examination in Public Hearing (EiP) held on 2 August 2018, the Inspectors' requested the relevant parties (as noted above) to provide a Position Statement, setting out any areas of agreement and disagreement regarding the issue of mines and minerals rights relating to HG2-124 and/or BL1-40 (together the "Site"). 2 This Position Statement has been prepared and submitted in response to the Inspectors' request. It sets out the factual and legal background to the land ownership of the relevant sites (so far as it is relevant to the issue of mines and minerals) and addresses Mr Makin's stated ownership of the mines and minerals. 3 Copies of the relevant title registers and plans as well as the Conveyance dated 30 August 1938 made between (1) Alvary Douglas Frederick Gascoigne and (2) Walter Dawson (the "1938 Conveyance") were provided to the Inspectors at the close of the EiP. Land Ownership of HG2-124 and BL1-40 – Agreed Facts 4 Under Title number WYK586916, Mrs Jean Makin, is registered with an absolute freehold title to the land known as land on the north side of Selby Road, Micklefield (the "Property") and which comprises part of HG2-124 and all of BL1-40. Entry Number 2 of the Property Register confirms that there is an express exception of mines and minerals together with the ancillary powers of working. -
Garforth and Church Fenton
High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | LA16 LA16: Garforth and Church Fenton High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H27 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report LA16: Garforth and Church Fenton H27 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. -
PNW00358 Outer North East MX2-39
Ref: PNW00358 HMCA\Topic: Outer North East Subject: Site in the plan Site: MX2-39 - Parlington Estate, Aberford Agree with proposed use? No Soundness Consider the plan sound? No Test of soundness addressed: Positively prepared Effective Justified Consistent with NPPF Changes required to make sound: The development is much too big for the current environment and not in keeping with the controlled expansion of villages and towns. This is not a village, but a new town! The site should be considered as an area of natural beauty and developed as a country park widening the usuage for the whole city of leeds. Issues Issue: Other - Local Character Local Character of the two small villages of Aberford and Barwick in Elmet with their unique identities and traditions are in danger of being destroyed by being amalgamated into one giant development in the future. Issue: Site boundary The site boundary encompasses most of the Parlington Civil Parish. It is massively too big dwarfing the two local villages or Aberford and Barwick In Elmet. The result of which may lead to one large conurbation in the future. Issue: Highways and transport the highway infrastructure in the area is totally inadequate to accommodate an additional 5,000 or more cars (or even 10,000 cars) and their average daily vehicle movements (25,000). The existing traffic volumes from Barwick, Aberford and the neighbouring villages already swamp the narrow and weight- limited bridges. The low and narrow rail bridge at Barwick Road, Garforth and the inadequate Town End junction in Garforth, where accidents and congestions occur frequently. -
Save Parlington Actiongroup
SAVE PARLINGTON ACTION GROUP RESPONSE TO INSPECTORS MATTERS, ISSUES AND QUESTIONS LEEDS SITE ALLOCATIONS PLAN EXAMINATION MATTER 5 1. MATTER 5 - INFRASTRUCTURE Issue – Whether the necessary infrastructure will be in place to support the planned development. Question 1. Is the process of identifying the infrastructure requirements arising from the proposed allocations set out in the SAP, as identified in the Infrastructure Background Paper (CD1/35) sound? 1.1 SPAG has analysed the Infrastructure Background Paper (CD1/35) with regards to the site MX2-39. We acknowledge that the paper covers issues with a broad brush approach for Leeds City Council (“LCC”) generally, but when assessed for MX2-39 it is apparent that large parts of the CD1/35 are unsound. Below are relevant points from the CD1/35 document with comments. Our conclusion is that the proposed infrastructure for MX2-39 is UNSOUND. CD1-35 heading Comments 1.2 Purpose of the Page 7 The paper commits to working with communities and through Infrastructure point neighbourhood planning. SPAG contends that LCC has not Delivery Plan 1.3 worked with its communities and can provide evidence of this regarding MX2-39 1.3 Developing the SAP Page 8, The paper states that LCC has consulted with organisations such Infrastructure point as Highways England. In March 2017 SPAG met with HE, who requirements 1.5 had no knowledge of the extent of MX2-39. SPAG can provide evidence that this statement is false, and therefore UNSOUND. To date, there is no report from Highways England with regards to MX2-39. 1.4 Developing the IDP Page 8 This was undertaken in April 2013, and LCC’s methodology was point applied to the sites proposed at that time. -
Appendix 2.4. Yorkshire Parliamentary Enclosure Awards
Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 25/09/2021 18:49:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS. APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS (From English (1985) and Local Records Offices) (In alphabetical order of parish). Key: NR = North Riding, ER = East Riding, WR = West Riding, N = Nottinghamshire NY = North Yorkshire, SY = South Yorkshire, WY = West Yorkshire, H = Humberside, Cl = Cleveland, Cu = Cumbria , D = Durham, La = Lancashire, Li = Lincolnshire, Gm = Greater Manchester, Post Parish/Township Riding 1974 Act Award Acres County Abbotside, High NR NY 1814 1851 128 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1824 1837 938 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1880 1881 9701 Acklam ER NY 1769 1776 796 Acklam ER NY 1825 1854 310 Ackton WR WY 1812 1816 60 Ackworth WR WY 1772 1774 652 Acomb & Holgate WR NY 1774 1776 1581 Adingham WR WY 1865 1873 735 Adlingfleet WR H 1843 1847 1051 -
BARWICK in ELMET & SCHOLES PARISH COUNCIL Response To
BARWICK in ELMET & SCHOLES PARISH COUNCIL Response to Leeds City Council’s position statement of 8th September 2017 Clerk to the Parish Council : Mr. K Langley 33 Flats Lane, Barwick in Elmet, Leeds LS15 4LJ phone 0113 393 5861 : email – [email protected] Below are the comments of Barwick In Elmet and Scholes Parish Council (“BIESPC”) on the answers provided by Leeds City Council (“LCC”) – LCC’s position statement on the SAP Examination and Selective Core Strategy Review, dated 8th September 2017 This document follows the structure of LCC’s position statement, and comments under the headings in the statement. LCC’s replies are in black ink. BIESPC’s comments are in blue ink Question a What is the effect of the selective review of the CS on the soundness of the SAP? a.1 The effect of the Core Strategy Review (CSR) on the soundness of the SAP is considered to be minor and broadly contextual, not least because the scope of both Development Plan Documents (DPD) is substantially different; 1. LCC’s reply to this question seems merely rhetorical and lacking in detail and substantiating evidence. This answer is inconsistent with LCC’s adopted Core Strategy. Core Strategy 1.4 states “The CS is the main document setting out the overall vision and strategic level policies… All other LDF documents will be guided by its policies including the Site Allocations Plan …”. Therefore the scope of the documents cannot be ‘substantially different’ and LCC is ignoring its own policies to suit its own ends; 2. To help overcome this weakness in LCC’s response, we would request that the Inspector also asks the following question: “What is the effect of the selective review of the CS, in comparison with the effect of a comprehensive review, on the soundness of the SAP?”; 3. -
2019 UCI Road World Championships
2019 ROAD WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS YORKSHIRE GREAT BRITAIN yorkshire2019.co.uk 21 - 29 SEPTEMBER 2019 @yorkshire2019 #yorkshire2019 CONTENTS Media information . 3 Forewords . 4 Competition and media events schedule . 5 Introducing the UCI . 6 Introducing Yorkshire 2019 . 8 The Yorkshire 2019 Para-Cycling International . 10 Introducing the UCI Road World Championships . 12 Introducing the Rainbow Jersey . 16 A nation of cyclists . 17 Yorkshire: The Rainbow County . 18 UCI Bike Region Label . 19 History makers . 20 Host towns . 22 Harrogate maps . 24 Other host locations . 26 Main Media Centre . 28 Media parking and broadcast media . 30 Photographers . 31 Mixed Zone . 32 Race routes . 34 Race programme . 35 02 DAY 1 Yorkshire 2019 Para-Cycling International . 36 DAY 2 Team Time Trial Mixed Relay . 38 DAY 3 Women Junior Individual Time Trial Men Junior Individual Time Trial . 42 DAY 4 Men Under 23 Individual Time Trial Women Elite Individual Time Trial . 46 DAY 5 Men Elite Individual Time Trial . 48 DAY 6 Men Junior Road Race . 50 DAY 7 Women Junior Road Race . 52 Men Under 23 Road Race . 54 DAY 8 Women Elite Road Race . 56 DAY 9 Men Elite Road Race . 58 Follow the Championships . 60 UCI Commissaires’ Panel . 62 Useful information . 63 MEDIA INFORMATION Union Cycliste Yorkshire 2019 Internationale (Local Organising Committee) Louis Chenaille Charlie Dewhirst UCI Press Officer Head of Communications louis .chenaille@uci .ch Charlie .Dewhirst@Yorkshire2019 .co .uk +41 79 198 7047 Mobile: +44 (0)7775 707 703 Xiuling She Nick Howes EBU Host Broadcaster -
Leeds Site Allocation Plan (Sap) Revised Publication Draft Section 3: Area Proposals: 6
LEEDS SITE ALLOCATION PLAN (SAP) REVISED PUBLICATION DRAFT SECTION 3: AREA PROPOSALS: 6. OUTER NORTH EAST REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF ABERFORD AND DISTRICT PARISH COUNCIL INTRODUCTION Please find set out in this letter our detailed comments in support of the enclosed completed forms relating to the Council’s proposed allocation of land at Parlington Estate, Aberford under reference MX2-39. The comments are being submitted on behalf of Aberford and District Parish Council which is gravely concerned by the nature and scale of the allocation. As a result, the Parish Council wish to object to the allocation of the site. SOUNDNESS AND CONFORMITY OVERVIEW The majority of the objection below is set out on the basis of a wide range of specific considerations, but overall, the allocation of MX2-39 is considered to be unsound on the following grounds:- Unjustified given the level of harm that the proposal would cause; Not based on a robust and credible evidence base that actually justifies the harm to be caused; An unreliable evidence base which includes inaccuracies such as the extent of public rights of way crossing the land and omits key information on archaeology and flood risk; Not the most appropriate strategy when considered against the alternatives, because of the harm that will be caused by development, relative to the alternative sites available that are more sequentially preferable. The strategy will also not support the settlement of Wetherby in accordance with the Core Strategy which places Wetherby at the heart of the Outer North East (ONE) Housing Market Character Area (HMCA); The Site Allocations Plan (SAP) will not be effective because it will not deliver appropriate development; It will also not be deliverable because it has not been demonstrated that mitigation can be delivered; and It is not consistent with the NPPF which aims to protect against harm. -
Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.1.1 Leeds City Council (LCC) Highways and Transportation (hereafter referred to as ‘the Applicant’) is seeking to obtain full planning permission for the construction of a Park & Ride facility at Alwoodley Gates (hereafter referred to as the 'Proposed Scheme’). The location is identified in Figure 1.1: Site Location and Figure 1.2: Aerial View of Site and described further in Chapter 2 – The Existing Site and Surroundings. 1.1.2 The proposed planning application will seek permission for: ‘The construction of a park and ride site providing up to 500 car parking spaces and a single storey bus terminus building. Associated works include reprofiling of site levels, lighting, hard and soft landscaping features, woodland planting and the introduction of sustainable drainage networks. The Park and Ride will be serviced by two separate vehicle access points with traffic management measures proposed at the entrances of these.’ 1.1.3 The planning application boundary for the Proposed Scheme is presented in Figure 1.3: Site Boundary; the area which it encompasses is referred to as ‘the Site’. Further details on the Proposed Scheme are presented in Chapter 3 – Description of the Proposed Scheme. 1.1.4 The Environmental Statement (ES) is the written output of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process which has been undertaken in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (Ref. 1.1) (hereafter referred to as the ‘EIA Regulations’). The ES is one of the supporting documents submitted to the local planning authority, in this case LCC Planning, in support of the planning application.