US EMV Smart Card Migration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

US EMV Smart Card Migration U.S. EMV Smart Card Migration: What Cards Do Merchants Hold in their Hand? Moderator: Claudia Swendseid, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Panelists: Rue Jenkins, Costco Wholesale Corporation Malcolm Nunes, The Home Depot Gavin Waugh, The Wendy’s Company ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. October 30, 2013 Agenda • Introductions • EMV Overview • EMV Global Deployment & Impact on Fraud • EMV Adoption in the U.S. • Business Case for Merchants • Issues Facing Merchants ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 2 Who We Are – Claudia Swendseid • Senior Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Federal Reserve System: Minneapolis • Establishes & executes U.S. • Serves on the Bank’s monetary policy Management Committee & has • Promotes a stable financial system responsibility for FedACH • Supervises & regulates financial operations & application institutions (FIs) development, Information • Provides financial services to FIs & Technology, Customer Contact U.S. Government Center, & the Payments Information & Outreach Office Mission in payments – To foster integrity, efficiency, & accessibility of U.S. payment & settlement systems in support of financial stability & economic growth ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 3 Who We Are – Rue Jenkins • Assistant Treasurer of Costco About Costco: Wholesale Corporation • Costco Wholesale Corporation • Responsible for a wide range of operates an international chain of Treasury & Cash Management membership warehouses that carry activities including treasury quality, brand name merchandise mgmt. & investment/borrowing • Over 600 warehouses worldwide activities, bank relationships & • $99.1 billion in revenue in 2012 foreign exchange activities • Employs over 107,000 people in • Manages global credit facilities the U.S. ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 4 Who We Are – Malcolm Nunes • Senior Manager of the About Home Depot: Financial Services • World’s largest home improvement Department, the group retailer responsible for managing the — 2,200 locations in the US, Canada cost of acceptance & Mexico • Current focus is on alternative • Home Depot corporate has annual & emerging payments revenues of $70 billion • Employs 325,000 people in the U.S. • Home Depot U.S. processes 2 million card transactions per day; accepts Visa, MasterCard, AMEX & Discover credit cards plus signature & PIN debit • First retailer to accept PayPal at the point of sale ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 5 Who We Are – Gavin Waugh • Vice President & Assistant About Wendy’s: Treasurer for The Wendy’s • World’s third-largest quick-service Company, operator & franchisor hamburger company of the Wendy’s® restaurant brand — 6,500 franchise & company restaurants in the U.S. & 26 countries worldwide • Responsible for capital markets, • Wendy’s corporate has revenues of Treasury operations, & tender $2.5 billion & employs 40,000 people type card programs in the U.S. • Serves on several Treasury • Wendy’s U.S. processes 300,000 card advisory committees including transactions a day & accepts Visa, the AFP Treasury Advisory Group MasterCard, AMEX & Discover credit cards & signature debit (but not PIN debit) “Upgrading the Wendy’s U.S. system to PIN pads inside our restaurants & at the drive -thru would cost more than 12 times the annual amount of post-liability shift fraud.” ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 6 EMV Overview What Why Is EMV EMV? ? EMV Choices ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 7 What Is EMV? • EMV (Europay, MasterCard & Visa) is a set of global proprietary specifications for credit & debit payment cards, point-of-sale terminals & card transaction processing networks based on “smart chip” card technology • Chip cards contain embedded microprocessors that provide EMV chip cards use an stronger security against counterfeit fraud in card-present embedded microprocessor transactions – i.e., card for payment transactions authentication ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 8 Why EMV & Why Now? • Helps reduce counterfeit card fraud by using dynamic data to authenticate card rather than static data as with magnetic stripe card • Doesn’t improve protection against lost & stolen & card-not-present fraud • May facilitate interoperability with global card infrastructure as EMV is adopted worldwide • May help prevent fraud shift from countries with EMV to U.S. • May serve as security foundation for other types of payment applications such as near field communication (NFC) ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 9 Chip Choices Card issuers must decide which EMV smart chip functions to implement Card Interface Card Cardholder Transaction Authentication Verification Authorization Contact Online Online PIN Online Contactless authentication Offline PIN authorization Dual Offline Signature Offline interface authentication No CVM authorization ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 10 EMV Global Deployment & Impact on Fraud ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 11 EMV Around the World 80 Countries Use EMV Payments Europe zone 1: 84.4% of cards Europe zone 2: Canada, Latin 94.4% of terminals 14.5% of cards America & the 68.1% of terminals Caribbean: 41.1% of cards 76.7% of terminals Asia Pacific: Africa & the Middle East: 28.2% of cards 20.6% of cards 51.4% of terminals 75.9% of terminals ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 12 Card-not-Present (CNP) Fraud after EMV 400 300 200 100 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (local currency) UK France Canada Australia Sources: Financial Fraud Action UK, The Observatory for Payment Card Security, Canadian Bankers Association, Australian Payments Clearing Association. 2012 France data is not available yet. ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 13 Cross-Border Fraud after EMV 60% 45% 30% 15% 0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (% of total fraud) UK France Australia Sources: Financial Fraud Action UK, The Observatory for Payment Card Security, Australian Payments Clearing Association. 2012 France data is not available yet. ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 14 14 Fraud Rates after EMV Results vary by market 12 9 6 3 0 (basis 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 points) UK France Canada (Interac Only) Australia Sources: Financial Fraud Action UK, The Observatory for Payment Card Security, Interac, Australian Payments Clearing Association ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 15 Global Card Fraud Up 14.6% in 2012 • Acquirers, issuers & Distribution of Card merchants lost $11.27 Fraud Losses billion worldwide due to card fraud in 2012 US accounts for nearly half (47.3%) of world’s total card fraud losses, but only – Issuers averaged fraud 23.5% of total card transactions losses of 6.13 cents per $100 spent – U.S. based counterfeiting crime accounted for over ¼ of global losses Rest of USA, World, 47.3% – U.S. led world in CNP 52.7% fraud losses; as U.S. is largest e-commerce market Source: Nilson Report cited in Business Wire press release, 8/13/2013 ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 16 EMV Adoption in the U.S. ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 17 U.S. Card EMV Smart Chip Migration Roadmap Key Dates October April 2013 October April 2015 October 2015 October October 2017 2012 2013 2016 Visa PCI Acquirers & 3rd party Card-present ATM liability audit processors ATM counterfeit shift relief required to acquirer liability takes Card-present support processors effect counterfeit merchant & sub- excluding liability takes acceptance processors automated effect for of EMV required fuel automated fuel transactions to support dispensers dispensers EMV data (AFD) MasterCard Account ATM Data liability Lost or ADC Compromise shift stolen relief (ADC) relief liability (95% - Lost or (50%) shift for 100%) stolen liability AFD shift Discover PCI audit relief American Express ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 18 EMV Migration Forum • Consortium of stakeholders working together to facilitate the U.S. migration – Card brands, ATM networks, debit networks, issuers, merchants, acquirers, processors, equipment & card manufacturers, consultants, & others; about 220 in total – Members pay fees to Smart Card Alliance – Entire group meets about every 3 months ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 19 EMV Forum Working Committees • Debit • Testing & Certification • ATM • Card-Not-Present • Communication & Education • EMV Deployment Coordination – Orlando, FL chosen as test city ©2013 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Materials are not to be used without consent. 20 Issuers Slow to Issue EMV Debit Cards When Do You Plan to
Recommended publications
  • How Can Private Sector Systems Achieve Public Policy Goals?
    Faster Payments in the United States: How Can Private Sector Systems Achieve Public Policy Goals? Fumiko Hayashi June 2015 RWP 15-03 Faster Payments in the United States: How Can Private Sector Systems Achieve Public Policy Goals?∗ Fumiko Hayashi† June 2015 Abstract Consumers and businesses are increasingly expecting faster payments. While many countries have already developed or are in process of developing faster payments, the availability of these payments is fragmented in the United States. The recently released paper by the Federal Reserve encourages private sector participants to provide faster payment services. However, private- sector faster payments systems will face significant challenges in achieving public policy goals of ubiquity, safety, and efficiency unless system governance represents broad public interests. One way to better align private-sector interests with those of the public is for the Federal Reserve to influence governance of the private-sector systems through its leadership role. JEL Classification: L5; L88; M14 Keywords: Faster payments, System governance, Public interest ∗ The author thanks Kelly Edmiston and Richard J. Sullivan for valuable comments, and Elizabeth Cook for editorial suggestions. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System. † Fumiko Hayashi is a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. E-mail: [email protected]. 1 1. Introduction In the wake of technological innovations such as high-speed data networks and sophisticated mobile computing devices, consumers and businesses have raised their expectations for faster payments. Payment users increasingly expect electronic payment products to be accessible through mobile and online channels at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • Contactless Operating Mode Requirements Clarification Whitepaper
    Contactless Operating Mode Requirements Clarification Whitepaper Version 1.0 Publication Date: February 2020 U.S. Payments Forum ©2020 Page 1 About the U.S. Payments Forum The U.S. Payments Forum, formerly the EMV Migration Forum, is a cross-industry body focused on supporting the introduction and implementation of EMV chip and other new and emerging technologies that protect the security of, and enhance opportunities for payment transactions within the United States. The Forum is the only non-profit organization whose membership includes the entire payments ecosystem, ensuring that all stakeholders have the opportunity to coordinate, cooperate on, and have a voice in the future of the U.S. payments industry. Additional information can be found at http://www.uspaymentsforum.org. EMV ® is a registered trademark in the U.S. and other countries and an unregistered trademark elsewhere. The EMV trademark is owned by EMVCo, LLC. Copyright ©2020 U.S. Payments Forum and Smart Card Alliance. All rights reserved. The U.S. Payments Forum has used best efforts to ensure, but cannot guarantee, that the information described in this document is accurate as of the publication date. The U.S. Payments Forum disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of information in this document. Comments or recommendations for edits or additions to this document should be submitted to: [email protected]. U.S. Payments Forum ©2020 Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Contactless Operating Modes ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Impact of Contactless Operating Mode on Debit Routing Options .............................................. 6 3. Contactless Issuance Requirements ..................................................................................................... 7 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Chip Cards and EMV: Coming Soon
    What are the benefits? Chip cards and Chip cards offer a more secure way to process card transactions. The secure microchip contains security EMV: coming soon data and software – because it is more difficult to fraudulently copy the details of the card, security is increased. Accepting chip cards therefore helps you reduce the risk of processing a counterfeit, lost or stolen card. And better card security means fewer disputed transactions. ADB3492 110908 We’re here to help You can find more information about EMV at www.commbank.com.au/emv If you have any further queries about EMV, you can email [email protected] or call our Merchant Help Desk on 1800 022 966, 24 hours, Important information about 7 days a week. your EFTPOS terminal inside What is EMV? What do you need to do? EMV (Europay MasterCard Visa) is the global All you need to do is leave your terminal switched ON electronic transaction standard named after the three overnight from 08 October, and we’ll do the rest. organisations that established it. The EMV standard enables EFTPOS terminals worldwide to process chip-based debit and credit cards. How do you know when To meet EMV standards, the Commonwealth Bank the upgrade is complete? is planning upgrades to its EFTPOS terminals so they can process chip cards. Once you swipe a card that has a chip, your EFTPOS Please note that after the upgrade, you will still be able terminal will prompt you to ‘insert card’ rather than to process cards using the magnetic strip, including ‘swipe card’.
    [Show full text]
  • EMF Implementing EMV at The
    Implementing EMV®at the ATM: Requirements and Recommendations for the U.S. ATM Community Version 2.0 Date: June 2015 Implementing EMV at the ATM: Requirements and Recommendations for the U.S. ATM Community About the EMV Migration Forum The EMV Migration Forum is a cross-industry body focused on supporting the EMV implementation steps required for global and regional payment networks, issuers, processors, merchants, and consumers to help ensure a successful introduction of more secure EMV chip technology in the United States. The focus of the Forum is to address topics that require some level of industry cooperation and/or coordination to migrate successfully to EMV technology in the United States. For more information on the EMV Migration Forum, please visit http://www.emv- connection.com/emv-migration-forum/. EMV is a trademark owned by EMVCo LLC. Copyright ©2015 EMV Migration Forum and Smart Card Alliance. All rights reserved. The EMV Migration Forum has used best efforts to ensure, but cannot guarantee, that the information described in this document is accurate as of the publication date. The EMV Migration Forum disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of information in this document. Comments or recommendations for edits or additions to this document should be submitted to: ATM- [email protected]. __________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 Implementing EMV at the ATM: Requirements and Recommendations for the U.S. ATM Community TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Smarts Behind EMV Smart Cards Part 2 – Offline Transaction Processing Yash Kapadia CEO, Omnipayments, Inc
    The Smarts Behind EMV Smart Cards Part 2 – Offline Transaction Processing Yash Kapadia CEO, OmniPayments, Inc. For the November/December 2014 Issue of The Connection It seems that every month comes with an announcement of another hack in which the data of millions of payment cards has been stolen. This data is used to clone credit cards and debit cards, which are then sold in the underground Internet. Is there any protection available to us to thwart such attacks? The answer is yes – smart cards. A smart card, also called a chip card or an integrated-circuit card (ICC), includes an embedded computer chip that employs cryptographic and risk-management features. In conjunction with a smart-card POS or ATM terminal, these features are designed to thwart skimming, card-cloning, card-counterfeiting, and other fraudulent attacks. A decade or more ago, a consortium of card issuers comprising Europay, MasterCard, and Visa (EMV) began the specification of smart cards or as they are formally known today, EMV cards. EMV card technology has been adopted by most of the countries on all continents in the world except for the United States. The United States is the laggard. Representing almost half of all payment cards and terminals in the world, the U.S. still runs its payment- card services on outdated magnetic-stripe technology. However, this is about to change. The U.S. payment-card industry has mandated that all merchants be EMV-compatible by October, 2015 (except for gas stations, which have until 2017) or face a “liability shift.” If a merchant does not process at least 75% of its transactions through an EMV-enabled terminal (whether via chip-cards or magnetic-stripe cards) and accepts a disputed or fraudulent card payment, the merchant will be liable for the transaction rather than the issuer.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Contactless ATM Transactions – a Guide for ATM Owners and Operators
    Guidelines for Contactless ATM Transactions – A Guide for ATM Owners and Operators Version 2.0 Publication Date: July 2019 U.S. Payments Forum ©2019 Page 1 About the U.S. Payments Forum The U.S. Payments Forum, formerly the EMV Migration Forum, is a cross-industry body focused on supporting the introduction and implementation of EMV chip and other new and emerging technologies that protect the security of, and enhance opportunities for payment transactions within the United States. The Forum is the only non-profit organization whose membership includes the entire payments ecosystem, ensuring that all stakeholders have the opportunity to coordinate, cooperate on, and have a voice in the future of the U.S. payments industry. Additional information can be found at http://www.uspaymentsforum.org. About the ATM Working Committee The U.S. Payments Forum ATM Working Committee explores the challenges of EMV migration for the U.S. ATM industry, works to identify possible solutions to challenges, and facilitates the sharing of best practices with the various industry constituents, with the goal result being more positive EMV migration experience for consumers. EMV is a trademark owned by EMVCo LLC. Copyright ©2019 U.S. Payments Forum and Secure Technology Alliance. All rights reserved. The U.S. Payments Forum has used best efforts to ensure, but cannot guarantee, that the information described in this document is accurate as of the publication date. The U.S. Payments Forum disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of information in this document. Comments or recommendations for edits or additions to this document should be submitted to: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Launch of Rupay Phase II: Issuance of Rupay Card
    PRESS RELEASE Launch of RuPay Phase II: Issuance of RuPay card 20th November 2020 In continuation to the RuPay Phase I, His Excellency Shri Narendra Modi, the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India and His Excellency Dr. Lotay Tshering, the Hon'ble Prime Minister of Bhutan, jointly e- launched the RuPay card issuance by the Bhutan National Bank Limited (BNBL) on 20th November 2020. The RuPay card scheme, being more affordable than other international card schemes, is a cross- border payment initiative between the two countries and is aimed at promoting the use of low-cost digital payment solutions and advance digital financial inclusion. The launch of RuPay card scheme in Bhutan is made possible by the interconnectivity of the Bhutan Financial Switch (BFS) with India's National Financial Switch (NFS), operated by the National Payment Corporation of India (NPCI). The transaction initiated with the BNBL-RuPay card from the ATM and/or PoS terminals in India will be routed to the NFS of NPCI, which in turn, will be routed to the BFS of RMA. The authenticity of the message will be checked at BFS with message authentication code (MAC) received from the NPCI with the application of a cryptography algorithm. The transaction will be routed to the BNBL financial switch for authentication and authorization. Additionally, the BNBL-RuPay card is EMV chip-based which provides enhanced security and protection against fraudulent transactions. The microprocessor on the EMV chip-card is protected by cryptographic encryption, which prevents the card from cloning. The BNBL’s RuPay debit cards can be accepted at more than 100,000 ATMs and 2 million PoS terminals deployed by the member banks of the National Payments Corporation of India for cash withdrawal, balance inquiry and purchases.
    [Show full text]
  • Rupay Contactless Ideathon (1.2)
    RuPay Contactless Ideathon (1.2) [RuPay Contactless Ideathon] Table of Contents CONTACTLESS PAYMENTS ...................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Objectives of RuPay Contactless ..................................................................................... 4 2.2 Product Description ........................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Benefits Of RuPay Contactless ........................................................................................ 5 PRODUCT COMPONENTS ....................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Issuance ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Service ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1.2 Balance ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 CONTACTLESS ACCEPTANCE ................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Acceptance ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS An American Express contactless transaction is a payment transaction initiated between a contactless card or devices such as mobile phones, fobs and stickers and a contactless-enabled terminal or reader. American Express Card Members can touch or tap their contactless card or device to the contactless reader to pay and go. What is the difference between a contactless card and a contact chip card? Chip card technology was designed to reduce counterfeit, lost/stolen and card-not-received fraud. Chip cards can either be contact or contactless. Contact EMVTM chip cards refer to either “Chip and PIN” or “Chip and Signature” cards. It utilizes microprocessor chips which securely store card data. The card is inserted into a terminal reader designed for smart cards. Depending if the card is “Chip and PIN” or “Chip and Signature” it will require the Card Member to either enter a PIN for authorization at the point of sale or sign for the transaction as with magnetic stripe cards. Contactless transactions are initiated when a contactless-enabled device is touched or tapped in front of a contactless reader at the point of sale. Account and security information is sent using radio frequency, from the contactless device to the reader. Both the device and the reader contain small antennae that allow data communication to take place. How are contactless cards and contactless-enabled terminals identified? The EMV Contactless Symbol and Indicator* marks identifies contactless terminals and payment devices. These icons are now used world-wide to signal contactless payment capability. Are contactless card payments secure? Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to EMV Chip Technology November 2014
    EMVCo, LLC Version 2.0 A Guide to EMV Chip Technology November 2014 A Guide to EMV Chip Technology Version 2.0 November 2014 - 1 - Copyright © 2014 EMVCo, LLC. All rights reserved. EMVCo, LLC Version 2.0 A Guide to EMV Chip Technology November 2014 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 References ..................................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 What are the EMV Chip Specifications? ........................................................................ 5 2.2 Why EMV Chip Technology? ......................................................................................... 6 3 THE HISTORY OF THE EMV CHIP SPECIFICATIONS ................................................... 8 3.1 Timeline .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 The Need
    [Show full text]
  • CONCEPT NOTE for IMPLEMENTATION of Rupay Qsparc BASED NATIONAL COMMON MOBILITY CARD V 2.1
    CONCEPT NOTE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF RuPay qSPARC BASED NATIONAL COMMON MOBILITY CARD v 2.1 Abstract This document talks about the National Common Mobility Card (NCMC) Program and RuPay based on this NCMC Program. This also covers the Standard Operating Procedure for its implementation by Transit Operators (e.g. Bus, Metro), Para-Transit (Toll, Parking etc.), and Smart Cities. Proliferation strategy for Transit, Retail, Smart City, and Para-transit segments has also been discussed in this document. National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) Mumbai Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose of the Document ..................................................................................................................... 5 3 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Existing Payments Mechanisms .................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Challenges and Limitations ........................................................................................................... 6 4 National Common Mobility Card Program ........................................................................................... 7 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maestro Europe Only Anti Fraud Measure by 23 Banks in Belgium Bart Guns Global Head of Payments KBC Group
    Maestro Europe only anti fraud measure by 23 banks in Belgium Bart Guns Global Head of Payments KBC Group COGEPS | 2-3 April 2012 Titel hoofdstuk Agenda 1.Problem 2.Anti skimming not feasible nor opportune 3.European statements 4.Chip only pragmatic issues 5.Europe only approach 6.Impact & Follow-up COGEPS | 2-3 April 2012 2 Fraud problem for debit cards abroad • Domestic debit card scheme BC/MC = zero counterfeit fraud thanks to chip & PIN • Skimming incidents on ATM’s in Belgium > Maestro fraud outside of Europe and primarily in USA • Fraudulent transactions = Magnetic stripe + PIN/signature > no liability shift allowed for USA • PSD: counterfeit fraud = Issuer’s responsibility > reimburse cardholder COGEPS | 2-3 April 2012 3 Anti-skimming not feasible nor opportune • Cost is high per ATM / Terminal and reinvestment every 3 to 5 years as solutions are being overruled • Only waterproof if majority of ATM are equipped • Time to market • Skimming migration to unattended POS (petrol stations, parkings…) and lack of anti-skimming solutions on the market >> Which optimal card approach? COGEPS | 2-3 April 2012 4 European statements (I) ECB 7th SEPA Progress Report: Cards highlights (10.2010) •From 2012 new SEPA cards by default “chip-only”, no mag-stripe payment data •Mag-stripe on request for non SEPA, not EMV regions or bank legacy functions •Liability shift should apply as incentive for EMV migration EPC EMV Fraud prevention Resolutions (2011) # 1 (Issuing) : •Restrict the use of magnetic stripe fall back to exceptional cases •Schemes to
    [Show full text]