Glazing Systems Intelligence Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
\203E\203F\203U\203T\203C\203G\203A\203B\203V\203\215\201[\203H\227Pultimate Float Flat Patterned.Xls
FIC リファレンスリスト F フロート 、、、フラット 、、、パターンドガラス (((111///333))) フロートブースト 納入年 納入先 国名 システム プロセス 1992 Ford Motor Co. U.S.A. 4 Zone System : 5250kVA Float- High Iron Plant Shutdown 1993 Pilkington S.I.V. Italy 4 Zone System : 5500kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 2nd Campaign 1993 Ford Motor Co. U.S.A. 3 Zone System : 3000kVA Float- High Iron 1994 Glaverbel Belgium 3 Zone System : 5000kVA Float- High Iron 1996 Ford Motor Co. U.S.A. 3 Zone System : 3000kVA Float- High Iron 2nd Campaign 1996 Sisecam Turkey 2 Zone System : 3500kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 1997 NEG Japan Custom System Special Float Project - PDP * 1997 Kumgang Chemical Korea 3 Zone System : 3500kVA Float- High Iron 2nd Campaign 1998 Ford Motor Co. U.S.A. 3 Zone System : 3000kVA Float- High Iron * 1998 Guardian Ind. U.S.A. 2 Zone System : 4500kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 2nd Campaign 1999 Nippon Sheet Glass Japan Model Study only: 6350kVA Float - Boost Project 3 Zone System 2000 Kumgang Chemical Korea 3 Zone System : 3500kVA Float- High Iron 2001 Jiangsu Farun China 1 Zone System : 1800kVA Float- High Iron * 2001 TGI Kunshan China 1 Zone System : 1800kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 2001 TGI Kunshan China 2 Zone System : 4500kVA Increased Clear 2002 Jiangsu Farun China 2 Zone System : 3000kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 2002 Sisecam Turkey 4 Zone System : 4400kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 2003 Jiangsu Farun China 2 Zone System : 3500kVA Float- High Iron & Incr. Clear 2004 TGI Chengdu China 2 Zone System : 3100kVA Increased Clear 2004 TGI Huanan China 2 Zone System : 3100kVA Increased Clear * 2004 TGI Kunshan China Extra Zone added 2004 Hebei Yingxin China 1 Zone System : 1800kVA Improved Quality & Incr. -
Facility Name NEISIC Code Description 2005 NEI Emissions
2005 NEI 2005 TRI Emissions Emissions Facility Name NEISIC Code Description (TPY) (TPY) Address City County DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO JM Adams STUART STATION Electric Services 0.08576238 0.291 745 U.S. 52 ABERDEEN County DP&L, KILLEN GENERATING Adams STATION Electric Services 0.02182673 0.1375 14869 U.S. Route 52 MANCHESTER County WHEMCO‐OHIO FOUNDRY INC Gray and Ductile Iron Foundries 0.000405 0.000405 1600 MCCLAIN RD LIMA Allen County 1900 FORT AMANDA INEOS USA LLC Nitrogenous Fertilizers 0.0002375 RD LIMA Allen County SUPERIOR FORGE & STEEL CORPORATION Steel Foundries, NEC 6.0526E‐05 1820 MCCLAIN ROAD LIMA Allen County Motor Vehicle Parts and FORD MOTOR CO.‐LIMA Accessories 3.9474E‐06 1155 BIBLE ROAD LIMA Allen County METOKOTE CORPORATION Coating, Engraving, and Allied 1340 NEUBRECHT PLANT 25 Services, NEC 1.9737E‐06 ROAD LIMA Allen County Vitreous China Plumbing Fixtures and China and MANSFIELD PLUMBING Earthenware Fittings and 150 EAST FIRST Ashland PRODUCTS Bathroom Accessories 0.00019309 0.151905 STREET PERRYSVILLE County CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., ASHTABULA Ashtabula PLANT Electric Services 0.021 0.0178 2133 Lake Road ASHTABULA County GENERAL ALUMINUM 1043 CHAMBERLAIN Ashtabula MANUFACTURING CO Aluminum Foundries 0.009 0.009 BLVD CONNEAUT County Ashtabula FOSECO METALLURGICAL INC. Nonclay Refractories 0.002 0.002 1100 MAPLE AVE CONNEAUT County MILLENNIUM INORGANIC Ashtabula CHEMICALS, INC. ‐ PLANT 2 Inorganic Pigments 0.00174211 2426 MIDDLE ROAD ASHTABULA County 2005 NEI 2005 TRI Emissions Emissions Facility Name NEISIC Code Description (TPY) (TPY) Address City County Primary Production of Ashtabula ROCK CREEK ALUMINUM INC Aluminum 0.001 0.001 2639 E. -
Oppose the Proposed Terminatiion of Judgement in U.S. V. Association of Casualty and Surety Companies, Et
SOCIETY OF COLLISION REPAIR SPECIALISTS Toll Free Phone (877) 841-0660 • Toll Free Fax 877-851-0660 Website: www.scrs.com • E-Mail: [email protected] • Mailing: P.O. Box 3037, Mechanicsville, VA 23116 Executive Officers: Brett Bailey (816) 741-6966 Chairman Missouri August 20, 2019 Bruce Halcro (406) 442-8611 U.S. Department of Justice Vice-Chairman Montana 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Amber Alley (415) 994-7913 Secretary California Washington, DC 20530-0001 Tim Ronak (949) 289-3357 Treasurer California RE: Oppose the proposed termination of judgement in U.S. v. Association of Paul Sgro (732) 222-3644 Casualty and Surety Companies, et al Director-at-Large New Jersey Kye Yeung (714) 957-1290 Immediate Past Chairman California Attorney General William Barr and the U.S. Department of Justice, National Directors: Michael Bradshaw (828) 569-1275 We write to you in opposition of the proposed termination of judgement in the U.S. v. North Carolina Association of Casualty and Surety Companies, et al, otherwise referred to as the 1963 Domenic Brusco (724) 931-3063 Pennsylvania Consent Decree. Trace Coccimiglio (801) 576-8585 Utah The Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS) serves as a not-for-profit national Dave Gruskos (732) 747-1770 association representing the hardworking collision repair facilities and specialized New Jersey professionals who work to repair collision-damaged vehicles across the United States. Jeff Kallemeyn (630) 257-2277 Illinois Matthew McDonnell (406) 259-6328 There is nothing more paramount than protecting consumer safety and maintaining a fair Montana and competitive landscape that ensures consumers can count on their insurance contracts Robert Grieve (303) 761-9219 Colorado to fairly indemnify them for loss in the event of an unfortunate accident. -
In the Matter of Owens Corning
0610281 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz William E. Kovacic J. Thomas Rosch ____________________________________ ) ) ) In the Matter of ) ) OWENS CORNING, ) Docket No. C- ) a corporation. ) ) ) ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and of the Clayton Act, and by virtue of the authority vested by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission (the “Commission”), having reason to believe that respondent Owens Corning (“Owens Corning”), a corporation, and Compagnie de Saint Gobain (“Saint Gobain”), a corporation, both subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, have agreed to an acquisition by Owens Corning of certain fiberglass reinforcements and composite fabrics assets of Saint Gobain in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its Complaint, stating its charges as follows: I. RESPONDENT 1. Respondent Owens Corning is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at One Owens Corning Parkway, Toledo, Ohio, 43659. Owens Corning is a global company engaged in a wide variety of businesses, including the development, manufacture, marketing, and sale of glass fiber reinforcements. 1 II. JURISDICTION 2. Owens Corning is, and at all times relevant herein has been, engaged in commerce as “commerce” is defined in Section 1 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. -
Through a Glass Darkly: the Case Against Pilkington Plc. Under the New U.S
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 16 Issue 2 Winter Winter 1996 Through a Glass Darkly: The aC se against Pilkington plc. under the New U.S. Department of Justice International Enforcement Policy Jeffrey N. Neuman Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey N. Neuman, Through a Glass Darkly: The asC e against Pilkington plc. under the New U.S. Department of Justice International Enforcement Policy, 16 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 284 (1995-1996) This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Through a Glass Darkly: The Case Against Pilkington plc. under the New U.S. Department of Justice International Enforcement Policy Jeffrey N. Neuman Trade and commerce, if they were not made of India-rubber,would never manage to bounce over the obstacles which legislatorsare continually put- ting in their way... - Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience I. INTRODUCTION A complaint and consent decree filed on May 25, 1994 by the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice against Pilk- ington plc., a British fiat glass manufacturer, is yet another indication that tough Federal Government antitrust enforcement policy is back in vogue.' The Government's complaint alleged that Pilkington's 1 United States v. Pilkington plc, 6 Trade Reg. -
2020 Form 10K FINAL.Pdf
Index UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___ to ___ Commission file number: 1-3247 CORNING INCORPORATED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) New York 16-0393470 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, New York 14831 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 607-974-9000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock GLW New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. -
ECON 3240 American Factory Workers in Chinese Factory Spring 2020
ECON 3240 American Factory workers in Chinese Factory Spring 2020 American Factory is great documentary for us, mainly because it discusses how some can fall out of the middle class, becoming vulnerable if not poor, but then thanks to government policy (what government) claw the their way back into the middle class, keeping the Dream alive for themselves and their children we hope (IG mobility). It is also the almost universal story but a story of how workers and manageres learng by doing (aka learning by doing). For reasons that become obviout in the film the same factories and workers learn to do better overtime, like AI but not artificial, more of a group dynamic with input from workers and managers. Somehow workers can become much more productive over time, using lesst time to produce the same number of cars (or glass panels..). The makers of this documentatry sense this dynamic: the camera dwells on the machinery and workers converting sand (silicon) many shapes of very transparent glass (our Coa our Chinese owner entreprenuer writes a song about transparency, which could have two meanings, and Fu, see the Terry Gross interview below. We see the last GM S-10 truck role through the assembly line and we are off, new owners, some new workers from China and 2000 American workers, some from the GM plant that clased. To spread the pain/ privelidge we can the divide the 1 hour 50 minute file into three sectiosn. Everyone read the cast of characters below should watch the first 20 minutes (some of the key cast members are listed below, the huge factory building itself is a star…I thought it was in Dayton, Ohio but actually in another town, this happens when land intensive factories spring up near cities). -
Ppg Industries Inc Letter Re
PPG Industries, Inc. One PPG Place Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15272 USA Law Department Telecopy No,: (41:9 434-4^ (412) 434-2465 Writer's Direct l>iat No.: Dec embe r S19 91 Mr. cKStrles S. Dyas, Jr. • Dinsmor^ & Sholh 1900 Cheraed Center 255 EastI Fifth Street Cincin^ati, OH 45202-3172 RE; Skinner Landfill Superfund Site West Chester. OH Dear Mr. Dyas: terno tr No"vember'~22r7-199'l'''~^reg ar dln'g-'the'^ upcoming Skinner Landfill PRP meeting on December 12, 1991. It is PPG's corporate policy with respect to Superfund activities to cooperate voluntarily with environmental agencies and other PRPs to address adverse conditions at a site where PPG is involved. PPG has conducted a diligent search of its records to determine whether any of its facilities sent materials to the Skinner Landfill. As PPG indicated in its 104(e) responses, it does not have any internal documents or other relevant evidence linking it to this site. Upon interviewing employees at PPG's Circleville facility, it was reported that PPG Circleville employed Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. during the relevant time period to transport finished products to various PPG customers. In addition, it is believed that Circleville received raw materials from suppliers via transport fay Chemical Leaman. PPG has no evidence that PPG used Chemical Leaman to transport waste materials and has submitted two 104(e) responses to the United States Environmental Protection Agency stating same. Mr. Charles R. Dyas December 9, 1991 Page 2 Based upon our current information, PPG does not believe that; it is connected to the Skinner Landfill site and, at this time, declines participation in the PRP group. -
DOT Number Database Database of Department of Transportation Numbers on Windshields from Various Sources Dot Number Manufacturer Location DOT‐1 SUPERGLASS S.A
DOT Number Database Database of Department of Transportation Numbers on Windshields From Various Sources Dot Number Manufacturer Location DOT‐1 SUPERGLASS S.A. EL TALAR TIGRE BS.AS. ARGENTINA DOT‐2 J‐DAK, INC. SPRINGFIELD TN UNITED STATES DOT‐3 SACOPLAST S.R.L. OTTIGLIO ALESSANDRIA ITALY DOT‐4 SOMAVER AIN SEBAA CASABNLANCA MOROCCO DOT‐5 JIANGUIN JINGEHENG HIGH‐QUAL. DECORATING GLASS WORKS JIANGUIN JIANGSU PROVINCE CHINA DOT‐6 BASKENT GLASS COMPANY SINCAN ANKARA TURKEY DOT‐7 POLPLASTIC SPA DOLO VENEZIA ITALY DOT‐8 CEE BAILEYS #1 MONTEBELLO CA DOT‐9 VIDURGLASS MANBRESA BARCELONA SPAIN DOT‐10 VITRERIE APRIL, INC. P.A.T. MONREAL QUEBEC CANADA DOT‐11 SPECTRA INC. MILWAUKEE WI DOT‐12 DONG SHIN SAFETY GLASS CO., LTD. BOOKILMEON, JEONNAM KOREA DOT‐13 YAU BONG CAR GLASS CO., LTD. ON LOK CHUEN, NEW TERRITORIES HONG KONG DOT‐15 LIBBEY‐OWENS‐FORD CO TOLEDO, OH, USA DOT‐16 HAYES‐ALBION CORPORATION JACKSON, MS, USA DOT‐17 TRIPLEX SAFETY GLASS COMPANY LIMITED BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND DOT‐18 PPG INDUSTRIES PITTSBURGH, PA, USA DOT‐19 PPG CANADA INC.,DUPLATE DIVISION OSHAWA,ONTARIO, CANADA DOT‐20 ASAHI GLASS CO LTD TOKYO, JAPAN DOT‐21 CHRYSLER CORP DETROIT, MI, USA DOT‐22 GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP AUBURN HILLS, MI, USA DOT‐23 NIPPON SHEET GLASS CO. LTD OSAKA, JAPAN DOT‐24 SPLINTEX BELGE S.A. GILLY, BELGIUM DOT‐25 FLACHGLAS AUTOMOTIVE GmbH WITTEN, GERMANY Page 1 of 27 Dot Number Manufacturer Location DOT‐26 CORNING GLASS WORKS CORNING, NY, USA DOT‐27 SEKURIT SAINT‐GOBAIN DEUTSCHLAND GMBH GERMANY DOT‐32 GLACERIES REUNIES S.A. BELGIUM DOT‐33 LAMINATED GLASS CORPORATION DETROIT, MI, USA DOT‐35 PREMIER AUTOGLASS CORPORATION LANCASTER, OH, USA DOT‐36 SOCIETA ITALIANA VETRO S.P.A. -
Quarterly Journal of the All India Glass Manufacturers' Federation Inside
Vol. 4 | No. 1 | April - June 2016 www.aigmf.com Quarterly Journal of The All India Glass Manufacturers’ Federation Bi-lingual Inside Interview Special Feature Yoshihiko Sano • Sustainability in Glass President of Nipro Corporation • A Note on Closed Glass Companies in the USA • Nipro Injects Innovation into Pre- for Artistic Appreciation filled Syringes and Targets US Expansion • Efficient Workflow: Automation and Digitisation Reduce Production and Handling Costs Upcoming Events (Sept 2, 2016) • FEA Studies of Impact Loads on NNPB Refillable • Enhancing Profitability by Empowering Workforce Bottles • Business Opportunities for Indian Glass Companies at Port of Duqm, • Energy Efficient Renovation Boost for Added- Sultanate of Oman Value Glazing • AIGMF Executive Committee Meeting / AGM Main Story Glass Packaging Supporting Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan (Clean India Campaign) event at Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute (CSIR-CGCRI), Kolkata Page No. 6 Technical Articles Prof. (Dr.) A. K. Bandyopadhyay Prof. (Dr.) A Sustainable 50 for postage postage for 50 ` ASS ASS www.aigmf.com Building and Packaging material - An Publication GlASS Gl Gl 500 (within India) + + India) (within 500 ` ` Overseas: US$ 60 (including postage and bank charges) bank and postage (including 60 US$ Overseas: Order Print Copies: Print Order Price: Price: PORT OF DUQM Duqm, 100% Foreign Ownership the preferred Tax -exemption for 30 years Free Repatriation of Capital Special Economic & profi ts No minimum capital requirement No currency restrictions Zone for your No personal income tax Exemption from import & overseas export duties Usufruct agreements up to 50 years renewable investment One-stop station service For more information, contact: Port of Duqm Company SAOC Tel: (+968) 24342800 | Fax: (+968) 24587343 | [email protected] | www.portduqm.com 2 Kanch | Vol. -
Cullet Supply Issues and Technologies David Rue
Cullet Supply Issues and Technologies David Rue The Glass Manufacturing Industry Council White Paper on Cullet Utilization and Opportunities is funded entirely by GMIC and is provided to all interested parties at no charge Cullet Supply Issues and Technologies October, 2018 The objective of this study is to provide information to assist GMIC members in gaining a better understanding of ways in which more post-consumer cullet can be recycled and to investigate technical changes GMIC could catalyze to make that happen. This White Paper Study was led by David Rue with input from Robert Lipetz (GMIC Executive Director) and input from experts on collection, processing, characterization, procurement, and re-use of cullet. The opinions of experts are often but not always in agreement. Efforts have been made to include input from all parties. To obtain the most open possible input, the names of all respondents have been excluded from this document. No proprietary information is included. Several company names are included, with the understanding that these references are for illustration and informational purposes and not as endorsement of the companies themselves. Introduction Glass is 100% recyclable. Recycled glass competes with raw material batch and must rely on cost to drive utilization. A wide range of factors affect the cost of cullet to the glass companies. Most surveys (EPA, Container Recycling Institute, GPI) agree that roughly 11 million tons of glass is disposed of each year in the US, and 32-34% of that glass is recycled. Approximately 2.7 million tons were recycled to container glass and 1 million tons to fiberglass in 2017 (Resource Recovery magazine, 2018). -
Punt Marks Guide Durobor SA
Reference of glass container manufacturing marks Punt Marks Guide Durobor SA ................................................................................................ 65 Table of Contents Elias Valavanis S.A. Glassworks ............................................................... 66 AGI Glaspac (Div. of HSIL, Formerly Associated Glass Industries, Ltd.) . 5 El Farran Glass Industry ........................................................................... 67 Addis Ababa Bottle & Glass Share Company ........................................... 6 El Nasr Glass & Crystal Co. ....................................................................... 68 Al Tajir Glass Industries LLC ....................................................................... 7 Fábrica de Envases de Vidrio - S.A. de C.V. .............................................. 69 Alembic Limited (Yera Glass) ..................................................................... 8 Fabrica Paraguaya de Vidrio (subsidiary of Ambev S.A.) ....................... 70 Allied Glass Containers Ltd. ....................................................................... 9 Formosan Glass Corporation ................................................................... 71 Amcor ........................................................................................................ 10 Gallo Glass Company ............................................................................... 72 Anadolu Cam Sanayii A.S. - SISECAM ..................................................... 11 Gamin Glass