Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona Mineral Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1737-F Chapter F Mineral Resources of the Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona By FLOYD GRAY, ROBERT C. JACHENS, ROBERT J. MILLER, ROBERT L. TURNER, DANIEL H. KNEPPER, JR., JAMES A. PITKIN, WILLIAM J. KEITH, JOHN MARIANO, and STEPHANIE L.JONES U.S. Geological Survey STANLEY L. KORZEB U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1737 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS: BLACK MOUNTAINS REGION, ARIZONA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1990 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Warm Springs wilderness study area, Mohave County, Arizona / by Floyd Gray...[et al.]. p. cm. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas Black Mountains region,; ch. F) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 1737) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1737-F 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Warm Springs Wilderness. 2. Warm Springs Wilderness (Ariz.) I. Gray, Floyd. I. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 1737. QE75.B9 no. 1737-F 557.3 s dc 20 90-14079 [TN24.A6] [553'.09791'59] CIP STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21,1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of part of the Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area (AZ-020-028/029), Mohave County, Arizona. CONTENTS Summary Fl Abstract Fl Character and setting Fl Identified resources F2 Mineral resource potential F3 Introduction F3 Area description F5 Previous and present investigations F5 Acknowledgments F6 Appraisal of identified resources F6 Mining history F6 Appraisal of sites examined F7 Gold- and silver-bearing veins F7 Oatman district veins F7 Cook mine and vicinity F8 Veins south of Warm Springs F8 Pegmatite F8 Zeolite F8 Perlite F9 Kaolin F9 Conclusions F9 Assessment of mineral resource potential F10 Geology F10 Geochemical studies Fll Methods Fll Results Fll Interpretation F12 Geophysical studies F12 Aeromagnetic data F13 Gravity data F13 Gamma-ray spectrometry F15 Landsatdata F16 Mineral and energy resource potential FIT References cited F19 Appendixes F21 Definition of levels of mineral resource potential and certainty of assessment F22 Resource/reserve classification F23 Geologic time chart F24 PLATE [In pocket] 1. Mineral resource potential and generalized geology of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona Contents FIGURES 1. Index map showing location of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona F2 2. Map showing mineral resource potential and generah'zed geology of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area F4 3. Residual total-field magnetic map of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area and vicinity F14 4. Isostatic residual gravity map of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area and vicinity F16 5. Map showing areas of potentially hydrothermally altered rocks in Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area FIT TABLES 1. Expansibility test results and description of samples from perlite prospects in the southeastern part of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona F10 2. Types of hydrothermal alteration, vein types, and host rock in Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona F18 VI Contents Mineral Resources of the Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona By Floyd Gray, Robert C. Jachens, Robert J. Miller, Robert L. Turner, Daniel H. Knepper, Jr., James A. Pitkin, William J. Keith, John Mariano, and Stephanie L. Jones U.S. Geological Survey Stanley L. Korzeb U.S. Bureau of Mines SUMMARY mineral resource potential for zeolite is high for the area surrounding the McHeffy Butte prospect and for one area in Abstract the southern part of the study area. Two areas inside the south and southeast boundaries of the study area have high At the request of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, mineral resource potential for perlite. The potential for ka- approximately 113,500 acres of the Warm Springs Wilderness olinite resources is moderate in two areas in the southern part Study Area (AZ-020-028/029) were evaluated for mineral re­ of the study area. The southern part of the study area has low sources and mineral resource potential. In this report, the resource potential for perlite and zeolite. Geothermal energy area studied is referred to as the "wilderness study area" or resource potential of the study area is low. The study area "study area"; any reference to the Warm Springs Wilderness has no resource potential for oil and gas. Study Area refers only to that part of the wilderness study area for which a mineral survey was requested. This study area is located in west-central Arizona. The U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines conducted geological, geo- Character and Setting chemical, and geophysical surveys to appraise the identified mineral resources (known) and assess the mineral resource The Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area (AZ-020- potential (undiscovered) of the study area. Fieldwork for this 028/029) is located 15 mi southwest of Kingman, 2 mi report was carried out largely in 1986-1989. There is a 1 - southeast of Oatman, and 1 mi west of Yucca, Ariz. (fig. 1). million short ton indicated subeconomic resource of clinoptilolite-mordenite zeolite and an additional inferred re­ The study area has total relief of about 3300 ft expressed source of 2 million short tons near McHeffy Butte, approxi­ by such topographic features as broad alluvial plains, long mately 2 miles west of the study area. A perlite deposit in the dissected mesas, and wide steep-walled canyons, the largest southeast corner of the study area contains an inferred of which is Warm Springs Canyon. subeconomic resource totaling 13 million short tons. An The study area is underlain mainly by Miocene and inferred subeconomic resource of gold in 225 short tons of (or) Oligocene (see "Appendixes" for geologic time chart) quartz having a grade of 0.018 troy ounces per short ton is volcanic rocks (fig. 2). These rocks unconformably overlie present at the Cook mine, 0.5 miles west of the study area. plutonic and metasedimentary rocks of Proterozoic age, The northwestern part of the Warm Springs Wilderness Study which are exposed in fault blocks in the southern and north­ Area has high mineral resource potential for gold and silver. eastern parts of the study area. Several ages and types of The south-central part of the study area has one area of mod­ erate and one area north of this south-central part has low faults are present in the study area, including Cenozoic high- mineral resource potential for gold and silver in and near angle and low-angle normal faults. An inferred caldera Warm Springs Canyon; the mineral resource potential for gold centered on Oatman, Ariz., could lie partly within the study is also moderate in three small areas in the southern part and area. Gold and silver deposits of the Oatman district are one area in the northeastern part of the study area. The about 1 mi northwest of the north boundary of the Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area. Disseminated gold depos­ its hosted by volcanic rocks are present several miles to the Manuscript approved for publication, August 27, 1990. north in the Black Mountains. Mineral Resource* of the Warm Spring* Wildemett Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona F1 Identified Resources important source for this material in the future. Quartz veins with past gold production in the Oatman district project Identified resources of perlite are present in the wil­ into the wilderness study area, where ore shoots may be derness study area. An inferred subeconomic resource of 13 present 2,000 ft or more below the surface of the study area. million short tons (st) of perlite is present in the southeast An inferred subeconomic resource of 225 st of quartz having corner of the study area. Perlite from this deposit may be of an estimated grade of 0.018 troy ounces gold per short ton sufficient grade to qualify as a filter aid and may become an (oz/st) is present at the Cook mine, 0.5 mi west of the study 35° 114° 30' 114° 15' 15' United Eastern mine/^S-^Sitereaves Pass 35° 00' Lazy Boy mine Black Range mine 34° 45' APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF WARM SPRINGS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (AZ-020-028/029) 5 MILES AREA OF AAAP Figure 1. Index map showing location of Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area, Mohave County, Arizona. Unlabeled dashed lines denote jeep trails. F2 Mineral Resources of Wilderness Study Areas: Black Mountains Region, Arizona area. A zeolite deposit approximately 2 mi west of the tential. The kaolinite was formed by selective alteration of study area near McHeffy Butte is a subeconomic resource nonwelded silicic tuffs present in the volcanic section. containing an indicated 1 million st and an inferred 2 mil­ Zeolites, formed by hydrothermal alteration of silicic lion st of clinoptilolite-mordenite. Further testing of tuffs, are present near McHeffy Butte, west of the study unweathered material is needed to characterize this deposit area, and near the kaolin quarry in the southern part of the and to determine the specific uses for the zeolite minerals it study area.
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages: Mount Perkins-Warm Springs Linkage Design
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES Mount Perkins - Warm S prings Linkage Design Paul Beier, Emily Garding, Daniel Majka 2008 MOUNT PERKINS-WARM SPRINGS LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, Shaula Hedwall, and Martin Lawrence helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., E. Garding, D. Majka. 2008. Arizona Missing Linkages: Mount Perkins-Warm Springs Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES ...............................................................................................................................II
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H: LHFO RMP Decisions
    Appendix H: LHFO RMP Decisions Conformance with Land Use Plan: The proposed action would conform to the decisions of the Lake Havasu Field Office RMP (2007) as identified with the decisions and excerpts shown below. WF-6. Within WHAs, the route designation process will determine route closures and/or limitation to meet habitat objectives. Page 112: The BLM will designate a Travel Management Network (TMN) for the planning area within 5 years of adoption of this Approved RMP through the TMP. The TMP will evaluate and designate all individual routes/trails for use within the planning area unless specified elsewhere in this Approved RMP. The BLM will follow the process as listed in Appendix B, Administrative Actions and Standard Operating Procedures, of this Approved RMP, when creating the TMN, including evaluating routes using the criteria listed in the Route Evaluation Tree in Appendix L (in the RMP). TM-1. Designations will be made and management implemented for a balance of opportunities for the entire range of motorized and non-motorized access needs, while in balance with other resource values found on public lands. TM-2. Reasonable, safe, and environmentally sound access will be provided to visitors, local residents, licensed or permitted activities, and property owners. Lake Havasu Field Office will be linked with other state, regional, and land management agencies or interest groups to better facilitate travel management. TM-3. Travel between communities within the planning area will be made safer. TM-4. Public access easements will be acquired across private or state lands where public access to federal lands and waterways is not available.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 905 Xxii. Appendix
    APPENDIX 905 XXII. APPENDIX 1. Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 PUBLIC LAW 101–628—NOV. 28, 1990 104 STAT. 4469 Public Law 101–628 101st Congress An Act To provide for the designation of certain public lands as wilderness in the State of Nov. 28, 1990 Arizona. [H.R. 2570] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.—Titles I through III of this Act may be Arizona Desert cited as the “Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990”. Wilderness Act of 1990. TITLE I—DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS TO BE 16 USC 460ddd ADMINISTERED BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT note. National Wilderness SEC. 101. DESIGNATION AND MANAGEMENT. Preservation System. (a) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of the 16 USC 1132 Wilderness Act, the following public lands are hereby designated as note. wilderness and therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 23,600 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled “Mount Wilson Wilderness” and dated February 1990, and which shall be known as the Mount Wilson Wilderness; (2) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 31,070 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled “Mount Tipton Wilderness” and dated February 1990, and which shall be known as the Mount Tipton Wilderness; (3) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 27,530 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled
    [Show full text]
  • MINERAL RESOURCES of the WARM SPRINGS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (AZ-O20-O28/O2g), MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA
    MLA ++++ Mineral Land Assessment I Open File Report/1988 I Mineral Resources of the Warm Springs Wilderness I Study Area (AZ-020-028/029), I Mohave County, Arizona I I I i I I I I I I I /~_~~ '~ BUREAU OF MINES I .'~,::i~lll~'"_.~J UNITEDSTATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ! m MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE WARM SPRINGS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (AZ-O20-O28/O2g), MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA I by I Stanley L. Korzeb I MLA 4B-8B 1988 I ,| |, Intermountain Field Operations Center Denver, Colorado I I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I Denver, Colorado BUREAU OF MINES I T S Ary Director I I ii, ~': i~,¸ PREFACE I The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-579) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct I mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted I to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a I mineral survey of the Warm Springs Wilderness Study Area (AZ-020-028/029), Mohave County, Arizona. I I I ill= .... ;i~il~: , i~!¸¸ j ~ !!i!~!~ ~!~ii~~ This open-file report summarizes the results of a Bureau of Mines wilderness study. The report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with the Bureau of Mines editorial I standards. This study was conducted by personnel from the Resource Evaluation Branch, Intermountain Field Operations Center, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaibab National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Potential Wilderness Area Region September 2013 Evaluation Report The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Kanab Creek Wilderness Kaibab National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Council Oa Where to Go Camping Guide
    GRAND CANYON COUNCIL OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, BSA OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE Table of Contents Introduction to The Order of the Arrow ....................................................................... 1 Wipala Wiki, The Man .................................................................................................. 1 General Information ...................................................................................................... 3 Desert Survival Safety Tips ........................................................................................... 4 Further Information ....................................................................................................... 4 Contact Agencies and Organizations ............................................................................. 5 National Forests ............................................................................................................. 5 U. S. Department Of The Interior - Bureau Of Land Management ................................ 7 Maricopa County Parks And Recreation System: .......................................................... 8 Arizona State Parks: .................................................................................................... 10 National Parks & National Monuments: ...................................................................... 11 Tribal Jurisdictions: ..................................................................................................... 13 On the Road: National
    [Show full text]
  • Special Uses in Wilderness Areas: Management Survey
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Uses in Wilderness Areas: Management Survey University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Uses in Wilderness Areas: Management Survey (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USES IN WILDERNESS AREAS: MANAGEMENT SURVEY (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USES IN WILDERNESS AREAS: MANAGEMENT SURVEY Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 March 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USES IN WILDERNESS AREAS: MANAGEMENT SURVEY................................................ 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Survey Results........................................................................................................................ 2 A. General Management ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CALIFORNIA DESERT WHO MANAGES the DESERT El Centro Field Office Havasu National Wildlife Refuge 1661 S
    BLM SPECIAL EDITION 1999 EXAMPLES OF AGENCY SIGNS SURFACE MANAGEMENT STATUS DESERT ACCESS GUIDE C aiiforma. c*cJ#der£ ocJidiricl ^^ v- Davis Dam BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ^ USDA FOREST SERVICE 1:100,000-Scale topographic map showing: Highways, roads and other manmade structures • Water features • Contours and elevations in meters • Recreation sites Partial coverage of former desert access guide #13 Needles NATIONAL PARK SERVICE •IITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR /READ OF LAND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Edited and published by the Bureau of Land Management National Applied Resource Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management California State Office. Planimetry partially revised by BLM from various source material. Revised information not field ( li.'c (.cd Base map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey. Compiled from USGS 1:24,000 and l:62,500-scale topographic maps dated 1956-1980, and from advance materials. Partially revised from aerial photographs taken 1980 and other source data. Revised information not CALIFORNIA STATE field checked. Map edited 1982. VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA Projection and 10,000-meter grid, zone 11: Universal Help protect your public lands by observing posted Transverse Mercator. 25,000-foot grid ticks based on Arizona OHV designations. Watch for OHV signs and read coordinate system, west zone, Nevada coordinate system, east them carefully. zone and California coordinate system, zone 5. 1927 North American Datum. For more information contact the BLM, USDA Forest Service, National Park Service, California State Park, Land lines are omitted in areas of extensive tract surveys. or California State Motorized Vechicle Recreation Area Office (see back panel for address and phone There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of numbers).
    [Show full text]