DOCSLIB.ORG

MSU Billings Government Documents Weeding List I 19.3 Numbers 1700’S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MSU Billings Government Documents Weeding List I 19.3 Numbers 1700’S MSU Billings Government Documents Weeding List I 19.3 Numbers 1700’s I 19.3: 1701-A 1987 Mineral resources of the big horn mountain wilderness study area, Maricopa county, Arizona I 19.3: 1701-B 1987 Mineral resources of the lower burro creek wilderness study area, Mohave and Yavapai counties I 19.3: 1701-C 1988 Mineral resources of the harquahala mountains wilderness study area I 19.3: 1701-E 1989 Mineral resources of the arrastra mountain/peoples canyon wilderness study area I 19.3: 1701-G 1990 Mineral resources of the rawhide mountains wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-A 1988 Mineral resources of the table top mountain wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-B 1989 Mineral resources of the new water mountains wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-C 1989 Mineral resources of the signal mountain wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-D 1989 Mineral resources of the muggings mountains wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-E 1989 Mineral resources of the baboquivari peak and coyote mountains wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-F 1989 Mineral resources of the Woolsey peak wilderness study area I 19.3: 1702-G 1989 Mineral resources of the eagletail mountains wilderness study area (WSA) I 19.3: 1702-H 1989 Mineral resources of the ragged top WSA I 19.3: 1702-I 1989 Mineral resources of the Sierra Estralla WSA I 19.3: 1702-J 1989 Mineral resources of the trigo mountains WSA I 19.3: 1702-K 1990 Mineral resources of the kofa unit 4 north wilderness study area I 19.3: 1703-A 1987 Mineral resources of the fishhooks WSA I 19.3: 1703-B 1987 Mineral resources of the needles eye WSA C:\Kathy\Government Documents Files\Gov Doc Weeding\Gov Doc Weeding Done\Missoula Is Done\I's\I 19.3\I 19.3 Numbers 1700's Gov Docs.docx6/3/2014 12:19 PM 1 | Page I 19.3: 1703-D 1986 Mineral resources of the dos cabezas mountains WSA I 19.3: 1705-A 1986 Mineral resources of the owens peak WSA I 19.3: 1705-C 1987 Mineral resources of pinnacles wilderness contiguous WSA I 19.3: 1705-D 1988 Mineral resources of the sacatar meadows WSA I 19.3: 1705-E 1989 Mineral resources of the rockhouse WSA I 19.3: 1706-A 1988 Mineral resources of the twin peaks WSA I 19.3: 1706-B 1988 Mineral resources of the tunnison mountain WSA I 19.3: 1706-E 1986 Mineral resources of the pit river canyon WSA I 19.3: 1706-F 1989 Mineral resources of the south warner contiguous WSA I 19.3: 1707-A 1987 Mineral resources of the high rock lake WSA I 19.3: 1707-B 1987 Mineral resources of the east fork high rock canyon WSA I 19.3: 1707-C 1987 Mineral resources of the little high rock canyon WSA I 19.3: 1707-E 1988 Mineral resources of the massacre rim WSA I 19.3: 1708-A 1985 Mineral resources of the inyo mountains WSA I 19.3: 1708-B 1985 Mineral resources of the owens peak and little lake canyon WSA I 19.3: 1708-C 1985 Mineral resources of the el paso mountains WSA I 19.3: 1709-A 187 Mineral resources of the funeral mountains WSA I 19.3: 1709-A/errata 1987 Errata for U.S. geological survey bulletin 1709-A I 19.3: 1709-B 1987 Mineral resources for the green water valley WSA C:\Kathy\Government Documents Files\Gov Doc Weeding\Gov Doc Weeding Done\Missoula Is Done\I's\I 19.3\I 19.3 Numbers 1700's Gov Docs.docx6/3/2014 12:19 PM 2 | Page I 19.3: 1709-C 1987 Mineral resources of the nopah range WSA I 19.3: 1709-D 1987 Mineral resources of the Kingston range WSA I 19.3: 1710-A 1985 Mineral resources of the palen-mccoy WSA I 19.3: 1710-B 1987 Mineral resources of the Morongo WSA I 19.3: 1710-C 1988 Mineral resources of the mecca hills WSA I 19.3: 1710-E 1988 Mineral resources of the orocopia mountains WSA I 19.3: 1711-A 1987 Mineral resources of the indian pass and picacho peak WSA I 19.3: 1711-B 1987 Mineral resources of the sawtooth mountains and Carrizo gorge/eastern mccain valley WSA I 19.3: 1711-C 1987 Mineral resources of the fish creek mountains WSA I 19.3: 1711-D 1987 Mineral resources of the jacumba (in-ko-pah) WSA I 19.3: 1711- E 1988 Mineral resources of the southern otay mountain and western otay mountain WSA I 19.3: 1712-A 1987 Mineral resources of the newberry mountains and rodman mountains WSA I 19.3: 1712-B 1987 Mineral resources of the cinder cones WSA I 19.3: 1712-C 1987 Mineral resources of the Bristol/granite mountains WSA I 19.3: 1712-D 1988 Mineral resources of the providence mountains WSA I 19.3: 1712-D/plate 1 1988 Bulletin 1712-D plate 1 I 19.3: 1713-A 1986 Mineral resources of the castle peaks WSA I 19.3: 1713-B 1988 Mineral resources of the turtle mountains WSA I 19.3: 1713-C 1987 Mineral resources of the fort piute WSA C:\Kathy\Government Documents Files\Gov Doc Weeding\Gov Doc Weeding Done\Missoula Is Done\I's\I 19.3\I 19.3 Numbers 1700's Gov Docs.docx6/3/2014 12:19 PM 3 | Page I 19.3: 1714-B 1988 Mineral resources of the diamond breaks WSA I 19.3: 1715-A 1987 Mineral resources of the American flats WSA I 19.3: 1715-B 1987 Mineral resources of the redcloud peak and handies peak WSA I 19.3: 1715-C 1988 Mineral resources of the Dolores river canyon WSA I 19.3: 1715-D 1989 Mineral resources of the Gunnison gorge WSA I 19.3: 1715-E 1990 Mineral resources of the tabeguache creek WSA 19.3: 1716-A 1985 Mineral resources of the black canyon and south piney creek WSA I 19.3: 1716-B 1986 Mineral Resources of the Beaver Creek Wilderness Study Area, Fremont, El Paso, and Teller Counties, Colorado I 19.3: 1716-C 1986 Mineral Resources of the Browns Canyon Wilderness Study Area, Chaffee County, Colorado I 19.3: 1716-D 1986 Mineral Resources of the Papa Keal and Zapata Creek Wilderness Study Ares, Alamosa County, Colorado I 19.3: 1717-A 1985 Mineral Resources of the Hack Lake Wilderness Study Area, Garfield County, Colorado I 19.3: 1717-B 1986 Mineral Resources of the Eagle Mountain Wilderness Study Area, Pitkin County, Colorado I 19.3: 1717-C 1986 Mineral Resources of the Bull Gulch Wilderness Study Area, Eagle County, Colorado I 19.3: 1717-D 1990 Mineral Resources of the Willow Creek and Skull Creek Wilderness Study Areas, Moffat County, Colorado I 19.3: 1719-E 1987 Mineral Resources of the Owyhee Canyon Wilderness Study Area, Malheur County, Oregon I 19.3: 1719-H 1988 Mineral Resources of the Upper West Little Owyhee Wilderness Study Area, Malheur County, Oregon I 19.3: 1725-A 1987 Mineral Resources of the Bad Lands Wilderness Study Area, Elko County, Nevada I 19.3: 1725-B 1987 Mineral Resources of the South Pequop Wilderness Study Area, Elko County, Nevada I 19.3: 1725-C 1987 Mineral Resources of the Bluebell and Goshute Peak Wilderness Study Area, Elko County, Nevada C:\Kathy\Government Documents Files\Gov Doc Weeding\Gov Doc Weeding Done\Missoula Is Done\I's\I 19.3\I 19.3 Numbers 1700's Gov Docs.docx6/3/2014 12:19 PM 4 | Page I 19.3: 1725-D 1987 Mineral Resources of the Rough Hills Wilderness Study Area, Elko County, Nevada I 19.3: 1725-E 1988 Mineral Resources of the Goshute Canyon Wilderness Study Area, Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada I 19.3: 1726-A 1986 Mineral Resources of the Mount Limbo Wilderness Study Area, Pershing County, Nevada I 19.3: 1726-B 1987 Mineral Resources of the South Jackson Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Humboldt County, Nevada I 19.3: 1726-C 1987 Mineral Resources of the Pahute Peak Wilderness Study Area, Humboldt County, Nevada I 19.3:1726-D 1987 Mineral Resources of the Blue Lakes Wilderness Study Area, Humboldt County, Nevada I 19.3: 1726-E 1987 Mineral Resources of the Black Rock Desert Wilderness Study Area, Humboldt County, Nevada I 19.3: 1727-A 1987 Mineral Resources of the Desatoya Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Churchill and Lander Counties, Nevada I 19.3:1727-B 1988 Mineral Resources of the Clan Alpine Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Churchill County, Nevada I 19.3: 1728-A 1986 Mineral Resources, Geology, and Geophysics of the Worthington Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada I 19.3: 1728-B 1986 Mineral Resources of the White Rock Range Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada and Beaver and Iron Counties, Utah I 19.3: 1728-C 1987 Mineral Resources of the Far South Egans Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada I 19.3: 1728-D 1987 Mineral Resources of the Parsnip Peak Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada I 19.3: 1728-E 1987 Mineral Resources of the Weepah Spring Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada I 19.3: 1728-F 1987 Mineral Resources of the Mount Grafton Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln and White Pine Counties, Nevada I 19.3: 1728-G 1990 Mineral Resources of the Marble Canyon Wilderness Study Area, White Pine County, Nevada, and Millard County, Utah I 19.3: 1729-A 1988 Mineral Resources of the South Pahroc Range Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada I 19.3: 1729-B 1988 Mineral Resources of the Mormon Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada I 19.3: 1729-C 1988 Mineral Resources of the Meadow Valley Range Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln and Clark Counties, Nevada C:\Kathy\Government Documents Files\Gov Doc Weeding\Gov Doc Weeding Done\Missoula Is Done\I's\I 19.3\I 19.3 Numbers 1700's Gov Docs.docx6/3/2014 12:19 PM 5 | Page I 19.3: 1729-D 1988 Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada I 19.3: 1730-A 1986 Mineral Resources of the La Madre Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Clark County, Nevada I 19.3: 1730-B 1987 Mineral Resources of the Mt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas
    Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1253 Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Mid-Cretaceous Rocks in Minnesota and Contiguous Areas By WILLIAM A. COBBAN and E. A. MEREWETHER Molluscan Fossil Record from the Northeastern Part of the Upper Cretaceous Seaway, Western Interior By WILLIAM A. COBBAN Lower Upper Cretaceous Strata in Minnesota and Adjacent Areas-Time-Stratigraphic Correlations. and Structural Attitudes By E. A. M EREWETHER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1 2 53 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Cobban, William Aubrey, 1916 Stratigraphy and paleontology of mid-Cretaceous rocks in Minnesota and contiguous areas. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1253) Bibliography: 52 p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16 A. Molluscan fossil record from the northeastern part of the Upper Cretaceous seaway, Western Interior by William A. Cobban. B. Lower Upper Cretaceous strata in Minnesota and adjacent areas-time-stratigraphic correlations and structural attitudes by E. A. Merewether. I. Mollusks, Fossil-Middle West. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic-Cretaceous. 3. Geology-Middle West. 4. Paleontology-Cretaceous. 5. Paleontology-Middle West. I. Merewether, E. A. (Edward Allen), 1930. II. Title. III. Series. QE687.C6 551.7'7'09776 81--607803 AACR2 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona
    2.SOB nH in ntoiOGIGM. JAN 3 1 1989 Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona By ED DE WITT, S.M. RICHARD, J.R. HASSEMER, and W.F. HANNA U.S. Geological Survey J.R. THOMPSON U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA AND PART OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data Mineral resources of the Harquahala Mountains wilderness study area, La Paz and Maricopa counties, Arizona. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Arizona and part of San Bernardino County, California ; ch. C) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1701-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Harquahala Mountains Wilderness. 2. Harquahala Mountains (Ariz.) I. DeWitt, Ed. II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701. QE75.B9 no. 1701-C 557.3 s [553'.09791'72] 88-600012 [TN24.A6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The BLM NEVADA NATIONAL LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION SYSTEM Strategy
    BLM The BLM NEVADA NATIONAL LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION SYSTEM Strategy i On March 30, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the Omnibus Public Land Management Act, which states: “In order to conserve, protect, and restore nationally signifi cant landscapes that have outstanding cultural, ecological, and scientifi c values for the benefi t of current and future generations, there is established in the Bureau of Land Management the National Landscape Conservation System.” [Sec. 2002 (a)] “The Secretary shall manage the system in accordance with any applicable law (including regulations) relating to any component of the system…and in a manner that protects the values for which the components of the system were designated.” [Sec. 2002 (c)] High Rock, Black Rock National Conservation Area Photo by Brian Beffort Dear Friends of the BLM Nevada, I am pleased to share this new plan, our strategy for managing Nevada’s National Landscape Conservation System lands. These lands represent some of the most scenic, culturally rich, and scientifi cally important of all public lands in the State. BLM Nevada manages three national conservation areas: Black Rock Desert-High Rock Canyon, Red Rock Canyon and Sloan Canyon; 45 wilderness areas; 63 wilderness study areas and three national historic trails. We are committed to responsibly managing these lands and this strategy document is an important step towards achieving BLM Nevada’s goal of conserving these areas. We would like to thank all of the partners and BLM employees who help us manage these special conservation lands and have contributed to this document. We are also grateful to the many photographers who assisted us with artwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Missing Linkages: Mount Perkins-Warm Springs Linkage Design
    ARIZONA MISSING LINKAGES Mount Perkins - Warm S prings Linkage Design Paul Beier, Emily Garding, Daniel Majka 2008 MOUNT PERKINS-WARM SPRINGS LINKAGE DESIGN Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. We thank Dr. Phil Rosen, Matt Good, Chasa O’Brien, Dr. Jason Marshal, Ted McKinney, and Taylor Edwards for parameterizing models for focal species and suggesting focal species. Catherine Wightman, Fenner Yarborough, Janet Lynn, Mylea Bayless, Andi Rogers, Mikele Painter, Valerie Horncastle, Matthew Johnson, Jeff Gagnon, Erica Nowak, Lee Luedeker, Allen Haden, Shaula Hedwall, and Martin Lawrence helped identify focal species and species experts. Robert Shantz provided photos for many of the species accounts. Shawn Newell, Jeff Jenness, Megan Friggens, and Matt Clark provided helpful advice on analyses and reviewed portions of the results. Funding This project was funded by a grant from Arizona Game and Fish Department to Northern Arizona University. Recommended Citation Beier, P., E. Garding, D. Majka. 2008. Arizona Missing Linkages: Mount Perkins-Warm Springs Linkage Design. Report to Arizona Game and Fish Department. School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES ...............................................................................................................................II
    [Show full text]
  • The Wunstorf Drilling Project
    Progress Reports The Wunstorf Drilling Project: Coring a Global Stratigraphic Reference Section of the Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 by Jochen Erbacher, Jörg Mutterlose, Markus Wilmsen, Thomas Wonik, and the Wunstorf Drilling Scientific Party doi:10.0/iodp.sd..0.007 section. Disciplines involved include micropaleontology Introduction and Goals (calcareous nannofossils, planktonic foraminifera), macro- paleontology (ammonites, inoceramids), stable isotopes and The mid-Cretaceous greenhouse world (Albian–Turonian) cyclostratigraphy mainly based on borehole logging, multi was characterized by high atmospheric carbon dioxide sensor core logging���������������������������������������,�������������������������������������� and x-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning levels, much higher global temperatures than at present�����,���� and data. The combination of geochemical, paleontological�����,���� and a lack of permanent ice caps at the poles (Bice et al., 2006; logging data will allow high resolution chemo- and biostra- Huber et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 2002). A characteristic tigraphy for the CTB�������������������������������������I������������������������������������ which may in ����������������������the future������������������ serve as an feature of this greenhouse world was the deposition of black international standard. shales during the Cenomanian / Turonian boundary interval (CTBI; Schlanger and Jenkyns, 1976; Arthur et al., 1990). The Wunstorf Core These carbon�����������������������������������������������-����������������������������������������������rich
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • CR 21-14 Big Game Quotas for the 2021-2022 Season.Pdf
    State of Nevada Department of Wildlife Game Division 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Ste 120 ● Reno, NV 89511 (775) 688-1500 Fax (775) 688-1987 ____________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM April 20, 2021 To: Nevada Board of Wildlife Commissioners, County Advisory Boards to Manage Wildlife, and Interested Publics From: Mike Scott, Administrator, Game Division Title: Commission Regulation 21-14, 2021 Big Game Quotas for the 2021-2022 Season – For Possible Action Description: The Commission will establish regulations for the numbers of tags to be issued to mule deer, pronghorn antelope, elk, bighorn sheep, and mountain goats for the 2021-22 season Presenter: Wildlife Staff Specialists Cody Schroeder, Cody McKee, and Mike Cox Summary: Generally, the Game Division is recommending lower quotas than in 2020. Nevada is experiencing continued drought conditions which affect big game populations in predominantly negative ways. The Game Division follows the Guidelines for Harvest Management in Nevada to provide the proposed big game tag quotas for each species and Area, Unit, or Unit Group. Game biologists survey big game populations, analyze data, model populations, write status and trend reports for each species and provide quota recommendations for Interested Publics, County Advisory Board members, and Wildlife Commissioners to consider. The recommended quotas are intended to sustain a balance between male-to- female ratios in big game populations while providing recreational opportunity for the hunting public. Employing a team approach in generating quota recommendations, Game Division staff scrutinize survey data, harvest data, population models, and resulting quota recommendations ensuring post-season ratios or other metrics will be met within the harvest guidelines. Should ratios end up above or below the male-to- female ratio objective, adjustments to the quotas are made to address that discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, and DE- VELOPMENT Subtitle A—Land Disp
    G:\COMP\109\WHITE PINE COUNTY CONSERVATION, RECREATION, A....XML White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 [Title III of division C of Public Law 109–432] [As Amended Through P.L. 116–9, Enacted March 12, 2019] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Public Law 109–432. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, * * * * * * * DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS * * * * * * * TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, AND DE- VELOPMENT SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec- essary to carry out this title. SEC. 302. ø16 U.S.C. 1241 note¿ SHORT TITLE This title may be cited as the ‘‘White Pine County Conserva- tion, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006’’.
    [Show full text]