CRSC ETCS-2 System Overview Key Benefits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CRSC ETCS-2 System Overview Key Benefits Incorporated in Delaware in 2016, CRSC (USA) Inc has opened its doors to the North America market to provide train control, rolling stock, and communication integrated solutions. CRSC (USA) Inc. specializes in system engineering services which includes systems design, systems integration, implementation, verification and validation. CRSC (USA) Inc will bring our parent company manufacturing capabilities to US soil for all those projects where Buy America is a requirement. Our parent company, CRSC LTD, initiated their services in 1953 as a Systems Integrator and has been become a global leader in transit control systems and rolling stock industry with their own OEM Products and Systems Solutions. CRSC ETCS-2 System Overview The ETCS-2 provided by China Railway Signals and Communications (CRSC) USA Inc. is a high-speed signaling system based on the already proven and safe European Train Control System Level 2 (ETCS-2) and meets all of its requirements. The ETCS-2 is a cost-effective, compact train control solution applicable to high speed rail, intercity rail, and commuter rail. The ETCS-2 implements the highest levels of safety while meeting peak customer demands for flexibility and performance. The ETCS-2 system is designed adhering to the principles of fail-safe operations with a max operating speed of 350 Km/h (217 MPH) and improved headway of 3 minutes. All subsystems within the ETCS-2 system comply with CENELEC standards and have passed the required safety assessments thus, acquiring a safety integrity level of SIL4. Safety Certifications for the ETCS-2 have been recognized and awarded by internationally recognized third party certification bodies known as TUV, Lloyds of England, and Atkins. The ETCS-2 is characterized by maintainability, reliability, and availability comprising of a multi-redundancy structure that utilizes reliable standard components for all the major equipment within the system. Using standard equipment reduces equipment types, increases the amount of available spare parts, and improves repair times. To meet various customer requirements, the ETCS-2 is a scalable and flexible system of modular design allowing ease in modification, extension, and customization of the hardware and software system. The ETCS-2 system offers the ability to interface with existing railway systems allowing phasing of migration minimizing technical and operational complications. During the life cycle of the system, these factors combined help mitigate maintenance costs and minimize system faults. Key Benefits Fail Safe: delivering the highest level of safety. The RBC, TSRS, ATP, and Balise meet SIL4 requirements. Excellent Reliability and Availability: designed with a 2oo2 redundant architecture for the RBC, TSRS, ATP. High Maintainability and Lower Maintenance Costs: due to reduced equipment types, spare parts, and repair times. Flexible System Architecture: with a modular design that is customizable to the customer’s needs. Suitable for Different Kinds of Interlocking Systems High-Speed Operating: maximum train operating speed of 350 Km/h (217 MPH) with an improved headway of 3 minutes which increases line capacity, train service frequency, and reduces delays. Short System Delivery Times: minimal disruption to ongoing operations. Onboard Equipment with 5 Driving Modes: Full supervision mode, Shunt mode, and On-sight mode, Staff Responsible mode, and Isolation mode; ensuring safety and reliability for all scenarios. CRSC (USA) Inc. 4168 Southpoint Pkwy Suite 202 Jacksonville FL, 32216 www.crsc-us.net System Equipment Configuration The ETCS-2 train control system is a fully redundant system distributed into 4 locations: Control Center Equipment Switch Machines Control Center System Axle Counter Sensors Radio Block Center (RBC) Fixed Balises (Transponders) Maintenance Management System (MMS) Crossing Controllers Key Management Control (KMC) Onboard Equipment Work Zone Management System Automatic Train Protection (ATP) System Station Equipment Automatic Train Operation (ATO) System CTC Station Server Driver-Machine Interface (DMI) DS6-60 Computer Based Interlocking (CBI) Balise Transmission Module (BTM) Maintenance Management System (MMS) Speed Sensor Equipment Radar Indoor Axle Counting Host Wireless Communication Receiver Module Mainline Wayside Equipment Signals Radio Speed 车载安全计算机 IO/MVB Interface with Wireless (备and) I/O Onboard ATO ATP Module Ranging Module Vehicle Module Equipment CAN RS485 DMI DMI P MVB BTM Radar PGG P rofibus Speed Senor Recorder CAU Wayside BTS BTS BTS BTS BTS Equipment OTE OTE OTE OTE OTE OBCU CAU PUC Balise Station Equipment Crossing Station Equipment Room Room Station Axle CTCCTC Station Station Crossing Mobile Terminal Axle CTCCTC Station Station Equipment Counter ServerServer Controller Counter ServerServer MMS Station MMS Station Server CBICBI Server CBICBI Maintenance Network Safety Network CTC Network Work Zone MMS TSRS RBC Management Control Center CTC Equipment Wireless Communication KMC RBC Offline Control Center Equipment Room CRSC (USA) Inc. 4168 Southpoint Pkwy Suite 202 Jacksonville FL, 32216 www.crsc-us.net CRSC ETCS-2 Functions The ETCS-2 is comprised of subsystems that reside within 4 locations (see figure 1 below): On-board equipment, Wayside Equipment, Station Equipment, and Control Equipment. Functions of the Centralized Train Control (CTC) system Observes and records train operation Adjusts train operation schedule Monitors train operation / displays at workstations Train operations control (automatic & manual) Speed limit governing System maintenance functions System clock management Functions of station subsystems and wayside equipment Radio Block Center (RBC) controls and manages trains in continuous communication level governing movement authority, verifying train locations within RBC boundaries, transferring track and speed information, train registration, and emergency messages. Temporary Speed Restriction Server (TSRS) is responsible for management of temporary speed limits. Key Management Center (KMC) generates and maintains train to ground wireless communication keys. DS6-60 Computer Based Interlocking (CBI) automatically or manually arranges routes according to CTC commands based on information statuses received from wayside equipment (signals, axle counters, track circuits, switch machines). Maintenance Management System (MMS) performs online monitoring of the control center, each station, the depot, status of each subsystem equipment, and fault alarms providing real- time and historical conditions. Also, the MMS manages work zone boundaries. Functions of On-board systems Onboard Automatic Train Protection (ATP) is responsible for reporting train position, supervising speed, supervising movement authority, and displaying actual speed, permitted speed, track data, and diagnostic data to the driver through the Driver-Machine Interface (DMI) Onboard Automatic Train Operation (ATO) is responsible for calculating target speeds, automatic driving mode, automatic train operation, automatic control of train doors, and stopping at the platform Onboard driving modes include Full Supervision mode (FS), Shunt mode (SH), On-sight mode (OS), Staff Responsible mode (SR) and Isolation mode (IS) CRSC (USA) Inc. 4168 Southpoint Pkwy Suite 202 Jacksonville FL, 32216 www.crsc-us.net ETCS-2 System Network Structure The Data communication Network (DCS) is responsible for communicating all information and is comprised of both a wired network and a wireless network. Both networks are accessed through the switching equipment within the DCS subsystem, except for the maintenance network. All wired and wireless networks adopt an A/B dual network redundancy configuration ensuring network availability in case of a network device or path failure. Wired network The wired network supplies a transmission path for independent networks, a redundant safety network, a redundant CTC network, and a maintenance network. The safety network achieves communications between CBI, RBC, and TSRS The CTC network transmits data between units The Maintenance network transmits data related to maintenance monitoring Wireless Network The wireless network supplies a transmission path for trackside RBC and Onboard equipment The RBC network transmits data for controlling and managing trains running in continuous communication level The Train-to-Ground wireless communication supports 220Mhz radio and GSM - R ETCS-2 Technical Specifications and Safety Compliance RAMS indicator reference Equipment System Reliability System Availability System Maintainability CTC MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour RBC MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour TSRS MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour ATP MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour CBI MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour Crossing Controller MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour Balise MTBF >1×105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour Axle Counter MTBF ≥ 1.75 × 105 hours ≥99.999% MTTR < 1 hour Compliance with Safety Requirements: ETRMS Systems Requirements Specifications 3.6.0 EN50125 EN50126, EN50128, & EN50129 (SIL4) EN50159 ISO 9001 & ISO 19011 CRSC (USA) Inc. 4168 Southpoint Pkwy Suite 202 Jacksonville FL, 32216 www.crsc-us.net .
Recommended publications
  • Approved Signalling Items for the ARTC Network ESA-00-01
    Division / Business Unit: Corporate Services & Safety Function: Signalling Document Type: Catalogue Approved Signalling Items for the ARTC Network ESA-00-01 Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement Internal / External Primary Source Existing ARTC Type Approvals Document Status Version # Date Reviewed Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved 1.3 03 May 2021 Standards Stakeholders Manager General Manager Signalling Technical Standards Standards 03/05/2021 Amendment Record Amendment Date Reviewed Clause Description of Amendment Version # 1.0 23 Mar 20 First issue of catalogue that lists signalling items and communication items related to signalling systems approved for use on the ARTC network. 1.1 26 Jun 20 New approved items added based on type approval and compliance to ARTC specification 1.2 24 Nov 20 New approved items added based on type approval and compliance to ARTC specification © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • AS 7651 Axle Counters
    AS 7651:2020 Axle Counters Train Control Systems Standard Please note this is a RISSB Australian Standard® draft Document content exists for RISSB product development purposes only and should not be relied upon or considered as final published content. Any questions in relation to this document or RISSB’s accredited development process should be referred to RISSB. AS 7651:2020 RISSB Office Phone: AxleEmail: Counters Web: (07) 3724 0000 [email protected] www.rissb.com.au Overseas: +61 7 3724 0000 AS 7651 Assigned Standard Development Manager Name: Cris Fitzhardinge Phone: 0419 916 693 Email: [email protected] Draft for Public Comment AS 7651:2020 Axle Counters This Australian Standard® AS 7651 Axle Counters was prepared by a Rail Industry Safety and Standards Board (RISSB) Development Group consisting of representatives from the following organisations: Sydney Trains United Goninian Limited Queensland Rail Aldridge Transport for NSW Metro Trains Melbourne ARC Infrastructure Mott MacDonald Frauscher Australia Thales PTV Siemens PTA WA NJT Rail Services The Standard was approved by the Development Group and the Enter Standing Committee Standing Committee in Select SC approval date. On Select Board approval date the RISSB Board approved the Standard for release. Choose the type of review Development of the Standard was undertaken in accordance with RISSB’s accredited process. As part of the approval process, the Standing Committee verified that proper process was followed in developing the Standard RISSB wishes to acknowledge the positive contribution of subject matter experts in the development of this Standard. Their efforts ranged from membership of the Development Group through to individuals providing comment on a draft of the Standard during the open review.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTINGWORLD the Customer Magazine for Axle Counter Systems 09.2018
    COUNTINGWORLD The Customer Magazine for Axle Counter Systems 09.2018 www.thalesgroup.com/germany CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO LITECE™ PAVING THE WAY FOR SMART SENSING TECHNOLOGIES A RAILWAY ACROSS THE DESERT MOBILITY SOLUTIONS FOR THE TOUGHEST ENVIRONMENT ON THE PLANET THE “WARRIORS” CHOOSE THALES THALES FLAGSHIP AXLE COUNTER SYSTEM DEBUTS IN SAN FRANCISCO maintenance multiply? Is an increase in train In addition, finite element calculations and density justifiable when the operational cost simulation of environmental conditions are rises, but the number of passengers does not? suitable methodical instruments to get the basic It is, after all, the minimum level of safety required design right from the beginning. and affordable costs, i.e. the expected life cycle costs or investment costs, that determine Nothing replaces real life a supplier’s selection of signalling system or experience to confirm resilience product. and reliability Availability and punctuality become With the new Lite4ce™ smart sensor, Thales measurable decision criteria is introducing an entirely new concept of wheel sensing for Axle Counting Systems: an Neglected in contract award decisions in the unprecedented challenge for a track-based past due to a lack of success criteria, both signalling system – innovative and fascinating punctuality and availability are slowly becoming – but with limited ability to rely on decades of the evaluation pillars for performance-based operational experience. contracts. Fully redundant “2 out of 3” signalling system concepts have been on the signalling Lite4ce™ – at the forefront of Dear Readers, market for many years and have drastically sensor technology reduced if not mitigated the effects of single points RELIABILITY BY DESIGN of failures.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive Summary 9 1
    November 2010 West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 9 1. Background 11 2. Dimensions 20 3. Current capacity, demand, and delivery 59 4. Planned changes to infrastructure and services 72 5. Planning context and future demand 90 6. Gaps and options 149 7. Emerging strategy and longer-term vision 156 8. Stakeholder consultation 157 Appendix A 172 Appendix B 178 Glossary Foreword Regional economies rely on investment in transport infrastructure to sustain economic growth. With the nation’s finances severely constrained, between Birmingham and London Marylebone, as any future investment in transport infrastructure well as new journey opportunities between Oxford will have to demonstrate that it can deliver real and London. benefits for the economy, people’s quality of life, This RUS predicts that overall passenger demand in and the environment. the region will increase by 32 per cent over the next 10 This draft Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) sets years. While Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for Control out the priorities for rail investment in the West Period 4 will accommodate much of this demand up Midlands area and the Chiltern route between to 2019, this RUS does identify gaps and recommends Birmingham and London Marylebone for the next measures to address these. 30 years. We believe that the options recommended Where the RUS has identified requirements for can meet the increased demand forecast by this interventions to be made, it seeks to do so by making RUS for both passenger and freight markets and the most efficient use of capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Route Strategic Plan Version 8.0: Delivery Plan Submission March 2019
    Western Route Strategic Plan Version 8.0: Delivery Plan submission March 2019 Western Route Strategic Plan Contents Foreword and summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Route objectives ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Safety ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Train performance .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Locally driven measures ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Sustainability & asset management capability ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Financial performance ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central West System Information Pack
    Queensland Rail does not warrant the fitness for purpose or accuracy of this information Central West System Information Pack Central West System Information Pack Version Information Version 3.0: 05/10/2016 • Removed Winton to Hughenden sections • Removed Clermont to Blair Athol Junction sections • Removed Nogoa to Springsure sections • Updated References Queensland Rail Network to Queensland Rail • Updated References Queensland Transport to DTMR • Removed reference 2005 Access Undertaking • EPA changed to Department • Updated Standards references • Updated Line Diagrams • Updated Climate Information • Updated Rail System Electrification • Updated Track Grade • Updated Network Control Regions & Singalling Centres • Updated Safeworking Systems • Update Noise Management System Issue 3.0 – October 2016 Page 1 of 85 Queensland Rail does not warrant the fitness for purpose or accuracy of this information Central West System Information Pack Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 General Information ......................................................................................................................................... 5 General Climate - Queensland Wide ............................................................................................................... 6 Cyclones ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Signalling Circuit Design Standards SDS 25
    Discipline Engineering Standard –NSW Category Signalling Title Signalling Circuit Design Standards Reference Number SDS 25 –(RIC Standard: SC 00 14 00 00 SP) Document Control Status Date Prepared Reviewed Endorsed Approved GM Standards and Standards Infrastructure Safety Systems Engineer Strategy & Committee Issue 1 Mar 05 Performance Revision 2 Refer to Refer to minutes Reference H Olsen M Owens of meeting Number 12/08/04 Engineering Standard –NSW Signalling SDS 25 Signalling Circuit Design Standards DISCLAIMER Australian Rail Track Corporation has used its best endeavors to ensure that the content, layout and text of this document is accurate, complete and suitable for its stated purpose. It makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be sufficient to ensure safe systems of work or operation. Australian Rail Track Corporation will not be liable to pay compensation in respect of the content or subsequent use of this document for any other purpose than its stated purpose or for any purpose other than that for which it was prepared except where it can be shown to have acted in bad faith or there has been willful default. DOCUMENT APPROVAL The technical content of this document has been approved by the relevant ARTC engineering authority and has also been endorsed by the ARTC Safety Committee. DOCUMENT SUPPLY and CONTROL The Primary Version of this document is the electronic version that is available and accessible on the Australian Rail Track Corporation Internet and Intranet website. It is the document user’s sole responsibility to ensure that copies are checked for currency against the Primary Version prior to its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Singnalling for Track Engineers
    November 2018 Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering Pune - 411001 FIRST EDITION : NOVEMBER 2018 70/- November 2018 Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering Pune - 411001 FOREWORD Indian Railway is one of the largest railway system in the world and spread in wide area. Safety and Punctuality demands up gradation of technology, modernization and adequate knowledge of field officials. It is felt since long to give professional response in track work connected to & dependent on signalling works. Engineering and signalling works when executed especially in yards require presence of each other. Therefore, Engineering officials need adequate technical knowledge about signalling appliances like track circuit, Axle counters and point machines. Instructions regarding track work in proximity of signals are scattered in form of Manuals, various policy instructions/ guidelines issued by Railway Board, RDSO from time to time. A necessity was therefore felt for compiling these instructions on this subject for quite some time. Shri Surendra Kumar Bansal, then Dean/IRICEN, Shri Niraj Kumar Mishra, Associate Professor/Track-1 & Shri Narendra Kumar Meher, Sr. Instructor/S&T-1 have made sincere efforts to fulfil this demand by bringing out this in book form. However, this book need review at frequent interval to keep it updated for authenticity. I hope that Civil Engineers of Railway will find it extremely informative and useful. Pune Ajay Goyal November 2018 Director / IRICEN / Pune PREFACE Safety is the first & foremost criteria in Indian railway followed by punctuality. It is impossible to deal safe running of trains without signaling arrangement. Signals give advance information regarding correct setting of routes and impart pre-warning to Loco pilots.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-The-Art Wheel Detection and Axle Counting Systems
    State-of-the-Art Wheel Detection and Axle Counting Systems Gerhard Grundnig © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 2012 © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 Agenda 1. Innovative Wheel Detection and Axle Counting Systems 2. Company overview 3. Case Studies | References 4. Conclusion © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 Wheel Detection Field of applications – axle counting systems – level crossings RSR 123 – switching tasks – measuring systems – diameter & speed measurement RSR 122 – customer-specific applications © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 RSR 180 Axle Counting Systems Axle counting system ACS2000 (relay interface) for – Main lines – Metro / trams – Regional lines – Industrial lines © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 Axle Counting Systems Axle counting system FAdC (serial interface) for – Main lines – Metro / trams – Regional lines – Industrial lines © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 Axle Counting Systems • Permanent innovation leads to different axle counting systems – ACS2000: fail-safe relay interface – FAdC: fail-safe serial interface (or fail safe relay interface as an option) – FAdCi: fail-safe serial interface • Every axle counting platform consists of variable components • Based on proven FWD systems (Frauscher Wheel Detection) • Safe determination of clear/occupied (track vacancy) • Exhaustive diagnostic information © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 Axle Counting Systems • Easy replacement of existing track circuit • Reliable counting of axles and fail-safe generation of Clear/Occupied message • Customized reset-function • Simple integration into any type of interlocking system • Serial interface affords compact interlocking systems with customer-specific and economic track vacancy detection (FAdC) • Modular and scalable design • Additional functionalities configurable (e.g. counting head control, driving direction, etc.) • Central and distributed architecture © Frauscher Sensortechnik GmbH | 28 March 2012 Axle Counting vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Railwaysignalling.Eu Walk the Rail Talk
    railwaysignalling.eu walk the rail talk How Track Circuits detect and protect trains Jodi Scalise November 2014 railwaysignalling.eu, Italy [email protected] ABSTRACT the track circuits is used to command a speed reduction or a Track circuit is the fundamental method of train detection. trip of the train A, avoiding a possible collision. The first track circuit, based on a DC technology, has been The occupancy information of a block is used to control the invented at the and of nineteenth. Over the years, the operation of all trains nearby the occupied area. continuous technological development has enabled to realize When a train is detected on a block, it cause a stop command track circuits in an increasingly performing way by using AC for the block immediately behind the train. Depending upon technology and modulations, but the basic principle for train the block lengths, the line speeds involved, and the number of detection is still the same. available speed commands, the second block behind the train An alternative approach is the Axle Counter system, which may have a command speed between zero and full line speed. uses a “check-in/check-out” logic. By comparing the result for The third block behind the train may have a commanded the axles counted in a block section with the result for those speed greater than or equal to the second block, and so on. In counted out, it is possible to know the status of the track all cases, the blocks behind a train are signaled so that a train section (free or occupied).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Route Strategic Plan V7
    Route Strategic Plan Western Route Version 7.0: Strategic Business Plan submission 2nd February 2018 Western Route Strategic Plan Contents Section Title Description Page 1 Foreword and summary Summary of our plan giving proposed high level outputs and challenges in CP6 3 2 Stakeholder priorities Overview of customer and stakeholder priorities 14 3 Route objectives Summary of our objectives for CP6 using our scorecard 26 4 Activity prioritisation on a page Overview of the opportunities, constraints and risks associated with each objective area, the 32 controls for managing these and the resulting output across CP5 and CP6 5 Activities & expenditure High level summary of the cost and activity associated with our plan based on the prioritisation in 41 section 4 6 Customer focus & capacity strategy Summary of customer and capacity themed strategies that will be employed to deliver our plan 66 7 Cost competitiveness & delivery strategy Summary of delivery strategies that will be employed, and of headwinds and efficiency plans 69 accounted developed to date 8 Culture strategy Summary of the culture themed strategies that will be deployed to deliver our plan 80 9 Strategy for commercial focus Summary of our strategy and plans to source alternative investment 86 10 CP6 regulatory framework Information relating to our revenue requirement and access charging income 88 11 Sign-off Senior level commitment from relevant functions 91 Appendix A Joint performance activity prioritisation by Overview of the opportunities, constraints and risks associated
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Alternative Detection Technologies for Trains and Highway Vehicles at Highway Rail Intersections 6
    U.S. Department Evaluation of Alternative Detection of Transportation Federal Railroad Technologies for Trains and Highway Administration Vehicles at Highway Rail Intersections Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 Safety of Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings DOT/FRA/ORD-03/04 February 2003 This document is available to the Final Report public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 and FRA web site at www.fra.dot.gov RAIL ROAD always e pect a train CROSSING Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT/FRA/ORD-03/04 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date February 2003 Evaluation of Alternative Detection Technologies for Trains and Highway Vehicles at Highway Rail Intersections 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Richard P. Reiff and Scott E. Gage, TTCI Anya A. Carroll and Jeffrey E. Gordon, Volpe Center DOT-VNTSC-FRA-03-02 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Transportation Technology Center, Inc. John A. Volpe National P.O. Box 11130 Transportation Systems Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Pueblo, CO 81001 55 Broadway DTFR53-93-C-00001 Task Order 123 Cambridge, MA 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.
    [Show full text]