DOCSLIB.ORG

Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute Event Report Global (dis)order: Towards dialogue-based worldviews Rhodes Forum 2019 Copyright © 2019 by Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute The right of Vladimir Yakunin, Jean-Christophe Bas, Berthold Kuhn, Cristina Stanca-Mustea, Heather Brown, Vladimir Popov, Maya Janik, Ekaterina Jarkov, Nikita Konopaltsev, Carl Drexler, Klemens Witte, Behrooz Gharleghi, Richard Higgott, Maxim Mikheev, and Jürgen Grote to be identified as the authors of this publication is hereby asserted. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views and opinions of the Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute, its co-founders, or its staff members. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, please write to the publisher: Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute gGmbH Französische Straße 23 10117 Berlin Germany +49 30 209677900 [email protected] 1 Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute Global (dis)order: Towards dialogue-based worldviews Rhodes Forum 2019 Table of contents Foreword……………………………………………………………………………….2 Executive summary…………………………………………………………………...5 Opening panel discussion – ‘30 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall: In search of a roadmap and a compass’…………………………………………..12 Special session with President Mahamadou Issoufou of Niger…………………16 Civilisation state: Multilaterism and globalisation…………………………………20 Creating shared economic views……………………………………………………23 The future of knowledge, education, and learning………………………………..26 Sustainable finance for culture……………………………………………………...29 Twiplomacy: Diplomacy and governance in the age of social media…………..34 Civil society and the state…………………………………………………………...39 Civil society and protest in the digital age…………………………………………44 Chasing the tiger: Economic models of the global south………………………..48 The role of philanthropy in the new world order…………………………………..51 Examining geopolitical worldviews: Towards a battle of giants?.......................55 Religion as a political factor and ideology..........................................................59 Towards a new partnership for Africa……………………………………………...62 Our smartphone lives: Of humans and robots…………………………………....66 World (dis)order and civilisations in dialogue: European (in)security in an age of civilisational states…………………………………..…………………...70 World order seen from a business perspective…………………………………..75 Culture and the return to civility…………………………………………………….79 Tunis Process: ‘Overcoming differences, sharing paths: Building concrete initiatives and policies’………………………………………………………….……84 Thank to our partners………………………………………………………………102 2 Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute Forward Ever since the first meeting in 2003, discussions at the annual Rhodes Forum have reflected the most important items dominating the global affairs agenda of the day. Debates at the Forum have produced ideas capable of shaping the future development of the world. The concepts, strategies, and solutions that have been debated always share the same human- centric aspiration – that cultural diversity and the common good of all people should be cherished and nurtured. The life of every individual is not only the top priority – it is essential for the progress and wellbeing of all of humanity. The theme of this year’s Rhodes Forum ventured into dialogue-based worldviews. The basis of dialogue should be ethical and constructive. Aristotle, in an ethical work addressed to his pupil Eudemus (who himself came from the island of Rhodes), wrote: “it is impossible to be truly virtuous without reason, nor reasonable without moral virtue” (translated from Russian, Eudemian Ethics, 1144a line 30). Rhodes Forum co-founder, Professor Fred Dallmayr, called the Dialogue of Civilizations initiative an ethical and moral commitment, and one that requires us to stand up and speak out if brute force threatens to undermine social justice and peace. Aristotle wrote his work more than two thousand years ago; Professor Dallmayr’s statement was made at the Rhodes Forum a little less than a decade ago. We can see that virtue, wisdom, and ethical norms are always central to humanity. And the Rhodes Forum remains a platform to find common solutions and answers to the most important issues affecting humanity. The Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute, which organises the Rhodes Forum, has emerged as a think tank that brings together ideas from different parts of the world. These ideas address multiple challenges related to the peaceful coexistence of diverse cultures and communities in a globalised world. 3 Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute Given the fact that a growing number of political leaders have disengaged from multilateral cooperation, and that nationalism and right-wing populism are on the rise across the world, many people are doubtful that their governments are able to address the problems that humanity faces today. Many societies are torn between those who embrace diversity and multilateral cooperation, and those who see them as a potential threat to cultural identity and the nation-state. The gap between these two groups is growing. How can it be reconciled? Keeping the peace among nations depends on the efficiency and precision of mechanisms that establish mutual understanding, as well as promote an atmosphere of trust among the parties involved – be they governments, NGOs, multinational corporations or individuals. The Rhodes Forum provides just this sort of mechanism – a specifically designed and historically proven space for dialogue where all voices can be heard and all peaceful aspirations can be met. The Rhodes Forum has consistently brought attention to the demand for a new world order, but also the threat of certain processes in the reconfiguration of the world order that could plunge all of us into a state of chaos. Over the past 18 years, experts from the Dialogue of Civilizations network have consistently testified to the fact that a world order based on technocracy and material consumerism is inherently unstable. Such a world could emerge due to the economic failure of existing models of global financial management, as well as the political flaws of global governance systems. Humanity is already facing the consequences of environmental degradation – a problem that will only intensify in future. The 17th Rhodes Forum facilitated a better understanding of the deep changes our societies are currently undergoing. It shed light on initiatives that contribute substantially to sustainable economic development; proposed concepts for new international governance models in the context of shifting power within the global economy; and examined the restoration of civility and the promotion of ethical standards in the digital age. 4 Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute In 2019, the Forum raised the tough question of how to stimulate a new narrative based on the shared values of people from different worldviews, religions, and cultures. Forum participants examined the most pressing global challenges and potential solutions. Our partners joined us in promoting the Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute’s principles of openness, reciprocity, and mutual trust. Most importantly, the Forum offered new and workable ideas and policy recommendations, the essence of which are presented in the following chapters. Vladimir Yakunin 5 Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute Executive summary The 2019 Rhodes Forum ventured into great debates on diverse challenges that the world faces today. Forum participants from more than 60 countries were driven by their passion for dialogue across cultures. The Forum achieved its objective in demonstrating that the methodology of dialogue of civilisations matters and that it is able to make a difference by producing convincing proposals on issues that trouble policymakers, experts, and the public. In his opening address, Dr. Vladimir Yakunin, Chairman of DOC Research Institute, stressed that the quest for a new multilateral world order should be based on equality, openness, trust, dialogue, and inclusion. He pointed out that experts from the Dialogue of Civilizations, over the past 18 years, have consistently testified to the fact that a world order based on the principles of technocracy and material consumerism would be inherently unstable. The agenda of the 17th session of the Rhodes Forum was based on a civilisational approach aimed at resolving issues of economic sustainability, the progress of civilisational states, digitalisation, interreligious dialogue, and cross-cultural interactions. This year, it had a particular focus on Africa. The Forum was proud to welcome His Excellency, the President of Niger Mahamadou Issoufou. In his opening remarks, Dr. Yakunin specifically referred to the opportunities and challenges of digitalisation. He quoted Israeli historian Yuval Harari, who recently told Mark Zuckerberg “connectivity doesn't necessarily mean harmony”. Harari asked quite a substantial question: “How to make sense of this world, which is more connected than ever, but at the same time is building more walls than ever before”? We need
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council
    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Intelligence
    N°70 - January 31 2008 Published every two weeks / International Edition CONTENTS SPOTLIGHT P. 1-3 Politics & Government c Medvedev’s Last Battle Before Kremlin Debut SPOTLIGHT c Medvedev’s Last Battle The arrest of Semyon Mogilevich in Moscow on Jan. 23 is a considerable development on Russia’s cur- Before Kremlin Debut rent political landscape. His profile is altogether singular: linked to a crime gang known as “solntsevo” and PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS sought in the United States for money-laundering and fraud, Mogilevich lived an apparently peaceful exis- c Final Stretch for tence in Moscow in the renowned Rublyovka road residential neighborhood in which government figures « Operation Succession » and businessmen rub shoulders. In truth, however, he was involved in at least two types of business. One c Kirillov, Shestakov, was the sale of perfume and cosmetic goods through the firm Arbat Prestige, whose manager and leading Potekhin: the New St. “official” shareholder is Vladimir Nekrasov who was arrested at the same time as Mogilevich as the two left Petersburg Crew in Moscow a restaurant at which they had lunched. The charge that led to their incarceration was evading taxes worth DIPLOMACY around 1.5 million euros and involving companies linked to Arbat Prestige. c Balkans : Putin’s Gets His Revenge The other business to which Mogilevich’s name has been linked since at least 2003 concerns trading in P. 4-7 Business & Networks gas. As Russia Intelligence regularly reported in previous issues, Mogilevich was reportedly the driving force behind the creation of two commercial entities that played a leading role in gas relations between Russia, BEHIND THE SCENE Turkmenistan and Ukraine: EuralTransGaz first and then RosUkrEnergo later.
    [Show full text]
  • Treisman Silovarchs 9 10 06
    Putin’s Silovarchs Daniel Treisman October 2006, Forthcoming in Orbis, Winter 2007 In the late 1990s, many Russians believed their government had been captured by a small group of business magnates known as “the oligarchs”. The most flamboyant, Boris Berezovsky, claimed in 1996 that seven bankers controlled fifty percent of the Russian economy. Having acquired massive oil and metals enterprises in rigged privatizations, these tycoons exploited Yeltsin’s ill-health to meddle in politics and lobby their interests. Two served briefly in government. Another, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, summed up the conventional wisdom of the time in a 1997 interview: “Politics is the most lucrative field of business in Russia. And it will be that way forever.”1 A decade later, most of the original oligarchs have been tripping over each other in their haste to leave the political stage, jettisoning properties as they go. From exile in London, Berezovsky announced in February he was liquidating his last Russian assets. A 1 Quoted in Andrei Piontkovsky, “Modern-Day Rasputin,” The Moscow Times, 12 November, 1997. fellow media magnate, Vladimir Gusinsky, long ago surrendered his television station to the state-controlled gas company Gazprom and now divides his time between Israel and the US. Khodorkovsky is in a Siberian jail, serving an eight-year sentence for fraud and tax evasion. Roman Abramovich, Berezovsky’s former partner, spends much of his time in London, where he bought the Chelsea soccer club in 2003. Rather than exile him to Siberia, the Kremlin merely insists he serve as governor of the depressed Arctic outpost of Chukotka—a sign Russia’s leaders have a sense of humor, albeit of a dark kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Updated 07.04.2011 LIST of PARTICIPANTS WORLD FORUM
    Last updated 07.04.2011 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS WORLD FORUM ON INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 7-9 APRIL, 2011 Name, Surname Country, Organization Contacts 1. Mr. Hans D’ORVILLE UNESCO, Assistant of Director General for Strategic Planning 2. Mrs. Katerina STENOU UNESCO, Director of the [email protected] Division for culture and intercultural dialogue 3. Ms. Liubava MOREVA UNESCO Moscow Office, [email protected] Programme Specialist for Culture 4. Dr. Abdulaziz Othman İSESCO, Director General [email protected] ALTWAIJRI 5. Mr. Mohamed RIFFI İSESCO, Officer in [email protected], Charge of Protocol and [email protected] Public Relations Division 6. Mr. Halit EREN IRCICA, Director General [email protected], [email protected] 7. Mr. Dussen KASSEINOV TURKSOY, Secretary [email protected] General m 8. Mr. Eflatun NEIMTEZADE TURKSOY, Professor of Gazi University 9. Mr.Askar TURGANBAYEV TURKSOY, Representative of Kazakhstan in TURKSOY 10. Mr. Evgeny NOVOZHILOV Commonwealth of [email protected] Independent States, Deputy Chairman of Executive Committee 11. Mr. Mevlüt ÇAVUŞOĞLU Council of Europe, [email protected] President Parliamentary Assembly 12. Mr. Erdogan DENIZ Council of Europe, Assistant to Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu 13. Mr. Artemy KARPENKO Council of Europe, Assistant to Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu 14. Mr. Robert PALMER Council of Europe, [email protected] Director of Culture, Cultural and Natural Heritage 15. Ms. Janis SYMONS Council of Europe, [email protected] Assistant of Robert Palmer 16. Mrs. Irena GUIDIKOVA Council of Europe, [email protected] Coordinator for Intercultural cities programme 17. Mr. Guiseppe ZAFFUTO Council of Europe, [email protected] Director of Communication, Media Officers/Spokepersons’ Service 18.
    [Show full text]
  • S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report
    Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 115–21 PUTIN’S ASYMMETRIC ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY A MINORITY STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 10, 2018 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–110 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN. 9 REPORT FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER seneagle Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, Tennessee, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware CORY GARDNER, Colorado TOM UDALL, New Mexico TODD YOUNG, Indiana CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon RAND PAUL, Kentucky CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN.
    [Show full text]
  • H-Diplo Roundtables, Vol. XIV, No. 28
    2013 Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane H-Diplo Labrosse Roundtable Web/Production Editor: George Fujii H-Diplo Roundtable Review Commissioned for H-Diplo by Thomas Maddux www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables Volume XIV, No. 28 (2013) Introduction by Donal O’Sullivan, California State 22 April 2013 University Northridge Geoffrey Roberts. Molotov: Stalin’s Cold Warrior. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2011. ISBN: 978-1-57488-945-1 (cloth, $29.95). Stable URL: http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables/PDF/Roundtable-XIV-28.pdf Contents Introduction by Donal O’Sullivan, California State University Northridge ............................... 2 Review by Alexei Filitov, Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences ................ 5 Review by Jonathan Haslam, Cambridge University ................................................................ 8 Review by Jochen Laufer, Potsdamer Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung ...................... 13 Review by Wilfried Loth, University of Duisburg-Essen .......................................................... 18 Author’s Response by Geoffrey Roberts, University College Cork Ireland ............................. 21 Copyright © 2013 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for non-profit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author(s), web location, date of publication, H-Diplo, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses, contact the H-Diplo editorial staff at [email protected]. H-Diplo Roundtable Reviews, Vol. XIV, No. 28 (2013) Introduction by Donal O’Sullivan, California State University Northridge emarkably, until recently Joseph Stalin’s closest aide, Vyacheslav Molotov, has rarely been the subject of serious scholarly interest. Geoffrey Roberts was one of the first R to see Molotov’s files.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treacherous Path He Was a KGB Agent at the Height of the Cold War, the CEO of Russia’S Biggest Ever Company, and a Confidante of Vladimir Putin
    The treacherous path He was a KGB agent at the height of the Cold War, the CEO of Russia’s biggest ever company, and a confidante of Vladimir Putin. On the eve of Russia’s general election, Vladimir Yakunin shines a spotlight on the inner workings of Russian power and the shadowy history of a nation misunderstood. Words: Joseph Bullmore Photography: Jonathan Mortimer Vladimir Yakunin is photographed at Mark’s Club, Mayfair, as his two advisors (with two phones apiece) wait in the wings. GENTLEMAN’S JOURNAL FEATURES 71 minorities; the state of the Russian econ- omy; the mysterious deaths of opponents in the West such as Boris Berezovsky and Alexander Litvinenko; the creeping influ- “In the dark ence of jettisoned oligarchs in Fleet Street, Mayfair and Westminster. All these, Yakunin believes, could be illuminated, even fleeting- ly, by a clearer discourse and his own candid reflections. The businessman has even set up years in which a think tank in Berlin called the Dialogue of Civilizations that hopes to bridge the chasm between Western and Russian beliefs. But, within just a few pages of the memoir and a few minutes of our meeting, I detect another their country reason for this sudden openness — a kind of personal therapy. “For many years I carried a double or may- be triple burden, because I had to fulfil many was demolished... jobs at the same time,” says Yakunin, describ- The two Vladimirs: Yakunin and Putin meet at Moscow's Rizhsky rail terminal ing his life in New York as an intelligence agent with the KGB.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Covid-19 on Orthodox Groups and Believers in Russia
    The Impact of Covid-19 on Orthodox Groups and Believers in Russia Anastasia V. Mitrofanova Abstract This chapter intends to discover how Orthodox groups and believers of different ideological orientations in Russia reacted to the 2020 world health crisis. Its fo- cus lies on the groups and individual believers from the field of Russian Ortho- doxy who could be labelled as ‘fundamentalists’. Therefore, an analysis of the offi- cial ecclesiastical reaction to the pandemic will be provided, that underlines how some contradictory messages from above caused significant numbers of believers to sympathize with the so called “corona-dissidents” within the Church. Under the topic ‘dissidents’, various other groups apart from the fundamentalists such as the moderate traditionalists, liberals, or individuals who usually follow the mainstream ecclesiastical opinion, can be subsumed. Furthermore, it could be observed that fundamentalists mostly discuss themes that might be common for all “dissidents”, although they are more open towards their criticism in view of the mainstream reactions. They stick to the assumption that both mundane and ecclesiastical leaders have discredited themselves and need to be replaced. Keywords: Orthodox Christianity, Covid-19, Ecclesiastical Lockdown, Corona- Dissidents, Fundamentalist Networks, Traditionalism, Russian Orthodox Church 1. Introduction This chapter intends to discover how Orthodox groups and believers of different ideological orientations in Russia reacted to the 2020 world health crisis. It focusses on groups and individuals who are labelled as “fundamentalists”, because they be- lieve for instance that the entire socio-political life should be changed in terms of 48 AnastasiaV.Mitrofanova collective religious salvation.1 Apart from the official position of the Moscow Pa- triarchate («the patriarchal platform»), Irina Papkova distinguishes three informal political ideologies within the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC): liberal (associated with intra-church movements initiated by late Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dartmouth Conf Program
    The Dartmouth Conference: The First 50 Years 1960—2010 Reminiscing on the Dartmouth Conference by Yevgeny Primakov T THE PEAK OF THE COLD WAR, and facilitating conditions conducive to A the Dartmouth Conference was one of economic interaction. the few diversions from the spirit of hostility The significance of the Dartmouth Confer- available to Soviet and American intellectuals, ence relates to the fact that throughout the who were keen, and able, to explore peace- cold war, no formal Soviet-American contact making initiatives. In fact, the Dartmouth had been consistently maintained, and that participants reported to huge gap was bridged by Moscow and Washington these meetings. on the progress of their The composition of discussion and, from participants was a pri- time to time, were even mary factor in the success instructed to “test the of those meetings, and it water” regarding ideas took some time before the put forward by their gov- negotiating teams were ernments. The Dartmouth shaped the right way. At meetings were also used first, in the early 1970s, to unfetter actions under- the teams had been led taken by the two countries by professionally quali- from a propagandist connotation and present fied citizens. From the Soviet Union, political them in a more genuine perspective. But the experts and researchers working for the Insti- crucial mission for these meetings was to tute of World Economy and International establish areas of concurring interests and to Relations and the Institute of U.S. and Cana- attempt to outline mutually acceptable solutions dian Studies, organizations closely linked to to the most acute problems: nuclear weapons Soviet policymaking circles, played key roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Research Reports Who Is Behind Russian Ideological
    Russia in Europe: the reactionary values agenda Summary of the Research Reports 1. Who is behind Russian ideological onslaught in Europe? (investigative report done by a free-lance Russian journalist) [pages 1-5] 2. Russian Influence in Europe: the reactionary values agenda (Marina Davidashvili – The European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development) [pages 5-8] 3. Russia's influence on promoting reactionary or socially regressive values in Central Europe (Political Capital Institute) [pages 8-10] 4. Traditional and Family Values in the Orthodox Commonwealth (Florin Buhuceanu – The European Forum of LGBT Christian Groups) [pages 11-12] 5. The Russian Influence in Italy and Spain: The agenda of reactionary values (Francisco Malavassi, desk researcher) [pages 12-15] 6. Russia in Europe: Reactionary Values Agenda – The case of Lithuania (The Open Society Fund Lithuania and the Human Rights Monitoring Institute) [pages 15-17] 7. "Traditional Values" in the Russian Public Diplomacy toward Latvia (Andis Kudors - The Centre for East European Policy Studies) [pages 17-20] 8. Russian Subversion and Regressive Agenda in France (Marie Mendras & Alain Guillemoles – Observatoire de la Russie, Sciences Po, Paris) [pages 20-24] Who is behind Russian ideological onslaught in Europe? Investigative report done by a free-lance Russian journalist The study looks at individuals and organizations that have played important roles in advancing Russian faux conservative, anti-European and anti-American agenda in four European countries: Ukraine (because it provides an example of how the ideological onslaught can transform into direct military aggression), Greece and Hungary (both among Russia’s staunches allies in the European Union, whose support is crucial as the Kremlin struggles to get the EU to lift the sanctions imposed in retaliation for invading Ukraine), and France (because of the growing Russian influence).
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th WORLD FORUM on INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE Baku, Azerbaijan: 2-3 May, 2019
    5th WORLD FORUM ON INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE Baku, Azerbaijan: 2-3 May, 2019 Building dialogue into action against discrimination, inequality and violent conflict LIST OF PARTICIPANTS № Organization Name Position 1. Mr Nabil El Sharif Executive Director Anna Lindh Foundation Head of Intercultural Research 2. Ms Eleonora Insalaco and Programming Asian Development Bank 3. Mr Nariman Mannapbekov Country Director 4. Mr Nail Valiyev Senior Economics Officer Black Sea Economic Ambassador, First Deputy Cooperation (BSEC) 5. Mr Izzet Selim Yenel Secretary General Caribbean Community Programme Manager, Culture and (CARICOM) 6. Ms Hilary Brown Community Development Deputy of Head of Executive Commonwealth of Committee of the Commonwealth Independent States (CIS) 7. Mr Agybay Smagulov of Independent States Cooperation Council of Turkic Speaking States (Turkic 8. Council) Mr Ali Civiler Project Director 9. Mr Bagdat Amreyev Secretary General 10. Mr Zoltan Hernyes Head of Office Ms Narmin Akhundova 11. Jumshudlu Assistant Mr Manuel Montobbio De Chair of the North-South Center 12. Balanzo Executive Committee Council of Europe Ms Gabriella Battaini 13. Dragoni Deputy Secretary General 14. Mr Alexandre Guessel Director of Political Affairs 15. Mr José Caroço Executive Director Global Education Programme 16. Mr Miguel Silva Manager Economic Cooperation 17. Organization Mr Hadi Soleimanpour Secretary General 18. Mr Muhammad Farooq Assistant Director European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Head of Resident Office in 19. Ms Ivana Fernandes Duarte Azerbaijan European Commission Deputy Head of Delegation, Head of Political, Economic, 20. Mr Dionysios Daniilidis Press&Information section European Union 21. Mr Kestutis Jankauskas Ambassador Media Adviser to the Secretary Gulf Cooperation Council 22. Mr Hamad Almannaei General Director General of Protocol of 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanov News Новости Романовых
    Romanov News Новости Романовых By Ludmila & Paul Kulikovsky №116 November 2017 Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna - "Akhtyrskaya Mother of God" The centenary of the October Revolution - Plenty of exhibitions, not much else November 7th arrived, the day of the centenary of the October Revolution, and expectations or even fear for some people were high, what would happen? Some even talked in advance about the possibility of a new revolution, but in fact not much happened. Also the official silence on the Revolution speaks volumes. Though a few public exhibitions were on display, the official narrative ignored the centenary of the Revolution in all spheres of the political system. It seems that it was more anticipated, talked about, and commemorated outside Russia and one can wonder why, now when the West is so Russophobic? Maybe many Westerners, who benefited from freedoms denied to Soviet citizens, naively romanticize the revolution, seeing it as being about kicking the rich and helping the poor. Do they really see Lenin as a "Robin Hood"? The truth is much more complicated. Ultimately, the October Revolution was a tremendous catastrophe that resulted in the split of a nation, a bloody civil war, mass murder, millions people forced into exile, the destruction of much of Russia’s creative and scientific establishment and the export of this brutal regime to other countries - where it all was repeated. Maybe the West were hoping for a new revolution in Russia, and they hoped this way they would kindle the revolutionary spirit of Russians today? If so, they failed! The fact is that the Russian elite are far more consolidated around President Putin than they were once around Emperor Nicholas II.
    [Show full text]