Historical Archaeology in Arizona a RESEARCH GUIDE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Arizona Historic Preservation Plan 2000
ARIZONAHistoric Preservation Plan UPDATE 2000 ARIZONAHistoric Preservation Plan UPDATE 2000 ARIZONASTATEPARKSBOARD Chair Executive Staff Walter D. Armer, Jr. Kenneth E. Travous Benson Executive Director Members Renée E. Bahl Suzanne Pfister Assistant Director Phoenix Jay Ream Joseph H. Holmwood Assistant Director Mesa Mark Siegwarth John U. Hays Assistant Director Yarnell Jay Ziemann Sheri Graham Assistant Director Sedona Vernon Roudebush Safford Michael E. Anable State Land Commissioner ARIZONA Historic Preservation Plan UPDATE 2000 StateHistoricPreservationOffice PartnershipsDivision ARIZONASTATEPARKS 5 6 StateHistoricPreservationOffice 3 4 PartnershipsDivision 7 ARIZONASTATEPARKS 1300WestWashington 8 Phoenix,Arizona85007 1 Tel/TTY:602-542-4174 2 http://www.pr.state.az.us ThisPlanUpdatewasapprovedbythe 9 11 ArizonaStateParksBoardonMarch15,2001 Photographsthroughoutthis 10 planfeatureviewsofhistoric propertiesfoundwithinArizona 6.HomoloviRuins StateParksincluding: StatePark 1.YumaCrossing 7.TontoNaturalBridge9 StateHistoricPark StatePark 2.YumaTerritorialPrison 8.McFarland StateHistoricPark StateHistoricPark 3.Jerome 9.TubacPresidio StateHistoricPark StateHistoricPark Coverphotographslefttoright: 4.FortVerde 10.SanRafaelRanch StateHistoricPark StatePark FortVerdeStateHistoricPark TubacPresidioStateHistoricPark 5.RiordanMansion 11.TombstoneCourthouse McFarlandStateHistoricPark StateHistoricPark StateHistoricPark YumaTerritorialPrisonStateHistoricPark RiordanMansionStateHistoricPark Tombstone Courthouse Contents Introduction 1 Arizona’s -
Download This
NPS Form 10-900 \ ____^——^"~""^ \ OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking V in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being nominated, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name McNair. Jonas. House other name/site number 2. Location street & number: 5919 W. Myrtle Avenue N/A not for publication city/town: Glendale____________ N/A vicinity state: Arizona code: AZ county: Maricopa code: 013 zip code: 85301 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that thisjfjiornination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Registep-cffHistoric Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property oPRM^ts D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant (D nationally D statewide)^MOcally. -
The Zooarchaeology of Secular and Religious Sites in 17Th-Century New Mexico
University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 8-2019 Eat This in Remembrance: The Zooarchaeology of Secular and Religious Sites in 17th-Century New Mexico Ana C. Opishinski University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, History Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Opishinski, Ana C., "Eat This in Remembrance: The Zooarchaeology of Secular and Religious Sites in 17th- Century New Mexico" (2019). Graduate Masters Theses. 571. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses/571 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EAT THIS IN REMEMBRANCE: THE ZOOARCHAEOLOGY OF SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS SITES IN 17TH-CENTURY NEW MEXICO A Thesis Presented by ANA C. OPISHINSKI Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2019 Historical Archaeology Program © 2019 by Ana C. Opishinski All rights reserved EAT THIS IN REMEMBRANCE: THE ZOOARCHAEOLOGY OF SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS SITES IN 17TH-CENTURY NEW MEXICO A Thesis Presented by ANA C. OPISHINSKI Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________________________ David B. Landon, Associate Director Chairperson of Committee ________________________________________________ Heather Trigg, Research Scientist Member ________________________________________________ Stephen W. -
Working Together to Preserve the Past
CUOURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Trtoian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and %he Privale Sector <yt CRM TotLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 Working Together to Preserve the Past U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE VOLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contents ISSN 1068-4999 To promote and maintain high standards for preserving and managing cultural resources Working Together DIRECTOR to Preserve the Past Roger G. Kennedy ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Katherine H. Stevenson The Historic Contact in the Northeast EDITOR National Historic Landmark Theme Study Ronald M. Greenberg An Overview 3 PRODUCTION MANAGER Robert S. Grumet Karlota M. Koester A National Perspective 4 GUEST EDITOR Carol D. Shull Robert S. Grumet ADVISORS The Most Important Things We Can Do 5 David Andrews Lloyd N. Chapman Editor, NPS Joan Bacharach Museum Registrar, NPS The NHL Archeological Initiative 7 Randall J. Biallas Veletta Canouts Historical Architect, NPS John A. Bums Architect, NPS Harry A. Butowsky Shantok: A Tale of Two Sites 8 Historian, NPS Melissa Jayne Fawcett Pratt Cassity Executive Director, National Alliance of Preservation Commissions Pemaquid National Historic Landmark 11 Muriel Crespi Cultural Anthropologist, NPS Robert L. Bradley Craig W. Davis Archeologist, NPS Mark R. Edwards The Fort Orange and Schuyler Flatts NHL 15 Director, Historic Preservation Division, Paul R. Huey State Historic Preservation Officer, Georgia Bruce W Fry Chief of Research Publications National Historic Sites, Parks Canada The Rescue of Fort Massapeag 20 John Hnedak Ralph S. Solecki Architectural Historian, NPS Roger E. Kelly Archeologist, NPS Historic Contact at Camden NHL 25 Antoinette J. -
Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ........................................................... -
Creating New Avenues for Success
Fall 08 Creating New Avenues for Success The West Valley Workforce and Labor Market Study Sponsored by WESTMARC and Maricopa Workforce Connections Prepared by ERISS Corporation and Advanced Workforce Systems Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. 4 WEST VALLEY LABOR MARKET STUDY INTRODUCTION .......................................... 7 SECTION 1 HEADLINES AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ 9 THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – HEADLINES EXPLAINED .......................................... 10 SECTION 2 THE WEST VALLEY OF PHOENIX ............................................................ 19 CONCLUSION: THE WEST VALLEY – THE BEST IS YET TO COME ........................ 32 SECTION 3 INDIVIDUAL COMMUNITY REPORTS ...................................................... 33 AVONDALE ..................................................................................................................... 34 BUCKEYE ....................................................................................................................... 40 EL MIRAGE ..................................................................................................................... 46 GILA BEND .................................................................................................................... 50 GLENDALE ..................................................................................................................... 55 GOODYEAR .................................................................................................................. -
CULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS CRITICAL STUDIES in the HISTORY of ANTHROPOLOGY Series Editors: Regna Darnell, Stephen O
CULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS CRITICAL STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY Series Editors: Regna Darnell, Stephen O. Murray Cultural Negotiations The Role of Women in the Founding of Americanist Archaeology DAVID L. BROWMAN University of Nebraska Press | Lincoln and London © 2013 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging- in-Publication Data Browman, David L. Cultural negotiations: the role of women in the founding of Americanist archaeology / David L. Browman. pages cm.— (Critical studies in the history of anthropology) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8032-4381-1 (cloth: alk. paper) 1. Women archaeologists—Biography. 2. Archaeology—United States—History. 3. Women archaeologists—History. 4. Archaeologists—Biography. I. Title. CC110.B76 2013 930.1092'2—dc23 2012049313 Set in Lyon by Laura Wellington. Designed by Nathan Putens. Contents Series Editors’ Introduction vii Introduction 1 1. Women of the Period 1865 to 1900 35 2. New Directions in the Period 1900 to 1920 73 3. Women Entering the Field during the “Roaring Twenties” 95 4. Women Entering Archaeology, 1930 to 1940 149 Concluding Remarks 251 References 277 Index 325 Series Editors’ Introduction REGNA DARNELL AND STEPHEN O. MURRAY David Browman has produced an invaluable reference work for prac- titioners of contemporary Americanist archaeology who are interested in documenting the largely unrecognized contribution of generations of women to its development. Meticulous examination of the archaeo- logical literature, especially footnotes and acknowledgments, and the archival records of major universities, museums, field school programs, expeditions, and general anthropological archives reveals a complex story of marginalization and professional invisibility, albeit one that will be surprising neither to feminist scholars nor to female archaeologists. -
AHS-Ephemera Collection
TITLE: Arizona Historical Society – Papago Park Ephemera Collection DATE RANGE: Territorial Arizona – present CALL NUMBER: PP-EPH PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: 135 linear feet (216 document boxes; 8 flat file drawers) PROVENANCE: From 2012-2014 all ephemeral and vertical file materials from multiple donors and locations were evaluated and consolidated to form a unified ephemera collection that could grow into the future. Recognition should be given to the thousands of donors and thousands of volunteer hours who collected and organized these materials. COPYRIGHT: Copyright varies RESTRICTIONS: None CREDIT LINE: Ephemera Collection, PP-EPH, Box/Folder #, Arizona Historical Society – Papago Park PROCESSED BY: Michelle Bickert, 2012-2014; updated 2018 HISTORICAL NOTE: The Ephemera Collection is an active, artificial collection featuring donations from multiple sources. The Ephemera Files donated to AHS by the Arizona Historical Foundation (AHF) comprise the core of this collection. Files from the AHS vertical files and Small Manuscripts collection were integrated during the process of removing duplicates, combining files, and evaluating the physical condition of these materials. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE: The Ephemera Collection is the largest ready reference collection in the AHS-Papago Park archives, containing approximately ten thousand items. Ephemeral materials were created for immediate rather than long-term use such as pamphlets, brochures, advertisements. It represents a wide range of social, economic, cultural and ethnic communities reflecting the spectrum of human activity, past and present, with an emphasis on mid-20th century Phoenix. The folder contents vary widely between one document and several. The files contain both primary and secondary sources, originals and photocopies, including but not limited to: newspaper clippings, programs, reports, fliers, promotional materials, tickets, brochures, advertisements, and articles. -
2013 Historical Archaeology Research Guide
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY IN ARIZONA A Research Guide Compiled by James E. Ayres, Carol Griffith, and Teresita Majewski With Contributions by The Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee, Thomas Jones and Archaeological Consulting Services, Ltd. Sixth Revised Edition, June 2013 State Historic Preservation Office 1300 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Arizona State Parks Board Chair Walter D. Armer, Jr. Alan Everett Vail Sedona R. J. Cardin Mark Brnovich Phoenix Phoenix Larry Landry Vanessa Hickman Phoenix State Land Commissioner Kay Daggett Bryan Martyn Sierra Vista Executive Director This document is available on the Arizona State Parks website – http://AZStateParks.com . This document is available in alternative formats by contacting the ADA Coordinator at (602) 542-7152. This revision has been completed under the Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee, a program of the Governor’s Advisory Archaeology Commission. This document was printed with Historic Preservation Fund grant money allocated to the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504.of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire information, please write: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. i The Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee The Governor’s Archaeology Advisory Commission (GAAC) has recently reestablished the Historical Archaeology Advisory Committee (HAAC), which heretofore functioned as an independent advisory committee under the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). -
Little Colorado River, Winslow, Arizona May 2016
US Army Corps of Engineers® Los Angeles District LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WINSLOW, ARIZONA FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROJECT DRAFT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT May 2016 This page left blank for duplex printing Little Colorado River Winslow, Arizona Flood Risk Management Project Draft Integrated Feasibility Report (Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement) Navajo County, Arizona Lead Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District (Corps). Abstract: This Draft Integrated Feasibility Report (Draft IFR) evaluates alternatives to reduce the risk of damages and to reduce the life, safety, and health risks caused by flooding of the Little Colorado River (LCR) to the City of Winslow, surrounding community, and public and private infrastructure. The Draft IFR documents the plan formulation and environmental impact analysis conducted by the Corps in close cooperation with Navajo County Flood Control District, the non-Federal sponsor for this study. The LCR at Winslow study area is located in the middle of the LCR Watershed, in and near the City of Winslow in western Navajo County, Arizona. The study area includes the floodplain of the LCR from the Clear Creek confluence downstream (northwest) to the northern end of the existing Winslow Levee. The 49-square-mile study area encompasses the City of Winslow, including the Ruby Wash Diversion Levee, and portions of unincorporated Navajo County. Alternatives include various combinations of structural and non-structural measures such as reconstruction of portions of the existing Winslow Levee and Ruby Wash Diversion Levee, levee setbacks, flood warning system and elevation of residential structures, and river channel conveyance improvements. The IFR evaluates the No Action Alternative and ten action alternatives, Alternatives 1.1, 3.1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, in detail. -
Glendale, Arizona 1 Glendale, Arizona
Glendale, Arizona 1 Glendale, Arizona Glendale, Arizona City Downtown Glendale, Arizona as viewed from the intersections of Glendale Ave. and 58th Ave. Seal Location in Maricopa County and the state of Arizona [1] [1] Coordinates: 33°32′19″N 112°11′11″W Coordinates: 33°32′19″N 112°11′11″W Country United States State Arizona County Maricopa Government • Mayor Jerry Weiers (Non-Partisan) Area Glendale, Arizona 2 • Total 55.8 sq mi (144.4 km2) • Land 55.7 sq mi (144.2 km2) • Water 0.1 sq mi (0.2 km2) Elevation 1,152 ft (351 m) Population (2010) • Total 226,721 • Density 4,063.1/sq mi (1,570.1/km2) Time zone MST (no DST) (UTC-7) ZIP code 85301-85318 Area code(s) 623 and 602 FIPS code 04-27820 Website http:/ / www. glendaleaz. com Glendale /ˈɡlɛndeɪl/ is a city in Maricopa County, Arizona, USA, located about 9 miles (14 km)) northwest from Downtown Phoenix. According to 2010 Census Bureau, the population of the city is 226,721. History In the late 1800s what is now known as Glendale, Arizona, was a desert wasteland. William John Murphy, a native of New Hartford, New York who resided in the town of Flagstaff in what was then known as the territory of Arizona, was in charge of building a 40-mile long Arizona Canal from Granite Reef to New River for the Arizona Canal Company. He competed the canal, which would bring water to the desert land, in 1885.[2] Murphy was deep in debt, since he had agreed to be paid in Arizona Canal Company stock and bonds and land instead of cash.[3] In 1887, Murphy formed the Arizona Improvement Company. -
Envision Glendale 2040 General Plan
General Plan September 30, 2016 Volume II – Elements and Plans City of Glendale General Plan Prepared for: City of Glendale Planning Division 5850 West Glendale Ave., Suite 212 Glendale, AZ 85301 September 30, 2016 Adopted by Glendale City Council on April 26, 2016 Ratified by Glendale voters on August 30, 2016 Prepared by: Please see the next page. Please see the next page. The City of Glendale would like to thank and recognize the efforts of those involved in the development of the Envision Glendale 2040 General Plan. City of Glendale Citizens of Glendale The residents of the City who participated in the development of the Envision Glendale 2040 General Plan. City Council . Jerry Weiers, Mayor . Ray Malnar (Sahuaro District) . Ian Hugh, Vice Mayor (Cactus District) . Lauren Tolmachoff (Cholla District) . Jamie Aldama (Ocotillo District) . Bart Turner (Barrel District) . Sammy Chavira (Yucca District) Planning Commission . Steve Johnston, Chairperson . Rick Harper . Al Lenox, Vice Chairperson . Gary Hirsch . Arthur Dobbelaere . David Moreno . Jack Gallegos General Plan Steering . Emmanuel Allen (Cactus District) . Elizabeth Medina (Barrel District) Committee . Mark Burdick (Sahuaro District) . Randy Miller (Barrel District) . Miles Charles (Cholla District) . Martin Nowakowski (Yucca District) . David Coble (Cholla District) . Edwin Nyberg (Cholla District) . Arthur G. Dobbelaere (Cholla District) . Rebecca Ontiveros (Ocotillo District) . Amanda Froes (Sahuaro District) . Thomas Orlikowski (Barrel District) . John Geurs (Ocotillo District) . Brian Pirooz (Cholla District) . Noel Griemsmann . Barbara Plante (Luke AFB) . James Grose (Cholla District) . Sharon Reeves (Barrel District) . Rick Harper (Sahuaro District) . Scott Richmond (Yucca District) . Robert Heidt (Glendale Chamber) . Alicia Rubio (Ocotillo District) . Gary Hirsch (Cactus District) . Tom Schmitt (Yucca District) .