A Course on Finite Groups

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Course on Finite Groups H. E. Rose A COURSE ON FINITE GROUPS Web Sections, Web Chapters and Solution Appendix Springer 322 TABLE OF Web Sections The material presented in this Web Site is additional to that given in the main text { A Course on Finite Groups. It consists of extra sections to some of the chapters with in most cases a set of supplementary problems, two extra chapters providing an introduction to group representation theory, and a long Appendix giving solutions, ranging from brief hints to complete answers, to all of the problems listed in the main text. Chapter, section, definition, theorem, problem and equation numbers all follow on from those given in the main text. In fact these Web Sections could be printed, and then slotted into the main text at the appropriate places allowing for the non-consecutive page numbers. Again it is a pleasure to thank Ben Fairbairn for commenting on and improving the text. Web Section 3:6 Representations of A5 .............................325 3.7 Problems 3W . .327 Web Section 4:6 The Transfer . 331 4.7 Group Presentation, Part 2 . 341 4.8 Problems 4W . ??? Web Section 5:4 Transitive and Primitive Permutation Groups, Iwasawa's Lemma ................................................................351 5.5 Problems 5W . .358 Web Section 6:5 Further Applications. Burnside's Normal Complement Theorem, Groups with Cyclic Sylow Subgroups . 361 6.6 Problems 5W . .367 Web Section 7:5 Infinite Abelian Groups. A Brief Introduction . .371 Web Section 9:4 Schur-Zassenhaus Theorem . 381 9.5 Problems 9W . ??? 324 Web Section 12.6 Simple Groups of Order less than 1000000, a second proof of the Simplicity of the Groups Ln(q), and a method for generating Steiner Systems for some Mathieu Groups ................... ..........389 12.7 Problem12W ....................................... .......396 Web Chapter 13 Representation and Character Theory ........401 13.1 Representations and Modules ......................... ....402 13.2 Theorems of Schur and Maschke ....................... ...408 13.3 Characters and Orthogonality Relations . ..412 13.4 Lifts and Normal Subgroups .......................... ....422 13.5 Problems13 ....................................... .......427 Web Chapter 14 Character Tables and Theorems of Burnside and Frobenius ................................................... .........433 14.1 Character Tables .................................. ....... 434 14.2 Burnside’s prqs-theorem ..................................440 14.3 Frobenius Groups .................................. .......444 14.4 Problems14 ....................................... .......455 14.5 Appendix on Algebraic Integers ........................ ...459 Web Solution Appendix Answers and Solutions, Problems 2 ........461 Problems 3 ........................................... .............472 Problems 4 ........................................... .............481 Problems 5 ........................................... .............489 Problems 6 ........................................... .............497 Problems 7 ........................................... .............508 Problems 8 ........................................... .............515 Problems 9 ........................................... .............521 Problems 10 .......................................... .............524 Problems 11 .......................................... .............532 Problems 12 .......................................... .............538 Problems A ........................................... ............544 Problems B ........................................... ............545 Subgroup lattice diagrams for Groups of Order 8, 12 or 16 ....... ..547 3.6 Representations of A5 325 3.6 Representations of A5 At the beginning of this chapter we noted that most groups have several distinct representations; to illustrate this fact we discuss here some repre- sentations of A5. In Section 3.2 we introduced A5 as the group of all even permutations on a five element set. It can also be (indirectly) specified as the only non-Abelian simple group up to isomorphism of order less than 100,1 see Problem 6.15. The group A5 has a number of presentations, three are as follows: 3 5 2 P1 : ha; b j a = b = (ab) = ei, 5 5 2 4 3 P2 : ha; b j a = b = (ab) = (a b) = ei, 3 3 3 2 2 2 P3 : ha; b; c j a = b = c = (ab) = (bc) = (ca) = ei. To show that each of these presentations do in fact define A5 we can argue as follows. Consider P1. We associate permutations in A5 (treating A5 as a per- mutation group) with each generator and then show that the corresponding relations hold. This shows that a copy of A5 is a factor of P1. Secondly, we show that P1 has 60 elements and this will be done in Problem 3.26. Similar arguments are required for P2 and P3. For P1 set a 7! (1; 4; 2) and b 7! (1; 2; 3; 4; 5); then ab = (1; 5)(3; 4): It is immediately clear that the relations of P1 are satisfied. For P2 we set a 7! (2; 1; 3; 4; 5) and b 7! (1; 2; 3; 4; 5); then ab = (1; 4)(3; 5) and a4b = (1; 3; 2); and for P3 we set a 7! (1; 2; 3); b 7! (1; 2; 4) and c 7! (1; 2; 5); note that (1; 2; j)(1; 2; k) = (1; k)(2; j) if j; k > 2 and j 6= k. The group A5 also has a number of matrix representations, we give two here and one more in Problem 3.27, further representation examples can be found in the Atlas (1985). First we show that SL2(4) is one such represen- tation. This group is defined as the set of all 2 × 2 matrices A with det A = 1 defined over the 4-element field F4, see Section 3.3. Let the elements of F4 be 0; 1; c and c + 1; where 1 + c + c2 = 0; and we work `modulo 2', that is 1 + 1 = c + c = 0 and c2 = c + 1; see Section 12.2. Using the presentation P3, we set 1 1 1 c + 1 1 c a 7! ; b 7! and c 7! ; 1 0 c 0 c + 1 0 1 In fact, it is the only non-Abelian simple group of order less than 168, see Chapter 12. 326 3 Group Constructions and Representations then c + 1 c + 1 c + 1 c c + 1 1 ab = ; bc = and ca = : 1 c + 1 c c + 1 c + 1 c + 1 We leave it as an exercise for the reader to show that these matrices satisfy the relations in P3, and that this system contains 60 matrices. Our second matrix representation is L2(5) which is defined as follows. Working over the 5-element field (that is working `modulo 5'), we take SL2(5) and factor out its centre. The process of forming a factor group is defined 1 0 −1 0 Chapter 4. The centre of SL2(5) is f 0 1 , 0 −1 g, see Problem 3.19; hence a b −a −b we work in SL2(5) and treat c d and −c −d as the `same' matrix. Formally, the elements of L2(5) are the cosets of Z(SL2(5)) in the group SL2(5). Note that −1 ≡ 4(mod 5) et cetera. Using the presentation P2 above, we set 1 0 4 1 a 7! and b 7! ; 3 1 1 3 then 4 1 4 1 ab 7! and a4b 7! ; 3 1 4 0 and it is a simple matter to show that the relations of P2 are satisfied. The choice of matrices and permutations above do satisfy the required conditions but are definitely not unique; as an exercise the reader should find some other examples. Another representation of A5 is as the rotational symmetry group of a dodecahedron. A dodecahedron is a regular solid structure with twelve regular equal-sized plane pentagonal faces with edges of equal length. This structure has three types of rotational symmetry: (i) rotation about a line drawn through the centres of opposite faces, this has order 5 as the faces are regular and have five edges; (ii) rotation about opposite vertices, in this structure three pentagonal faces meet at a vertex, and so this symmetry has order 3; and (iii) rotation about the centres of opposite edges, this has order 2. Now using the presentation P1 above, if we associate a symmetry of type (ii) with a and a symmetry of type (i) with b, then a symmetry of type (iii) is associated with ab. To see this the reader should obtain a model of an dodecahedron and try it! It is now easily seen that the relations of P1 are satisfied, and (with some patience) that there are 60 symmetries in all. An excellent film, made by the Open University for their second year course in pure mathematics, illustrates this isomorphism clearly. The group A5 can also be treated as the rotational symmetry group of a icosahedron. An icosahedron I is a regular solid with 20 identical equilateral triangular faces and it can be inscribed in a dodecahedron D by taking the vertices of I as the centres of the faces of D. This process is self-inverse for we can also inscribe a dodecahedron inside an icosahedron using the same method. This latter representation of A5 is the one that has been used by 3.7 Problems 3W 327 some chemists to describe the structure of the carbon molecule Carbon60, see page 24. The Atlas (1985) gives some more representations of A5, for example as unitary groups defined over the fields F16 or F25. Also this group occurs as maximal subgroups of a number of simple groups, for example A6;L2(k) where k = 11; 16; 19; 29 and 31, and the Janko group J2 (sometimes called the Hall-Janko group). Further details are given in Chapter 12, the Atlas (1985), and the `online' Atlas. 3.7 Problems 3W Problem 3.25 (An Example of a Free Group) A linear fractional trans- formation f of the complex plane C to itself is a map of the form az + b f (z) = where ad − bc 6= 0 for a; b; c; d 2 : a;b;c;d cz + d C (i) Show that the mapping a b 7! f c d a;b;c;d is a homomorphism (see Section 4.1) from GL2(C) to the group of all linear fractional transformations. 1 0 1 2 (ii) Show that the matrices A = 2 1 and B = 0 1 generate a free subgroup in the group of all linear fractional transformations.
Recommended publications
  • Discussion on Some Properties of an Infinite Non-Abelian Group
    International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT) – Volume 48 Number 2 August 2017 Discussion on Some Then A.B = Properties of an Infinite Non-abelian = Group Where = Ankur Bala#1, Madhuri Kohli#2 #1 M.Sc. , Department of Mathematics, University of Delhi, Delhi #2 M.Sc., Department of Mathematics, University of Delhi, Delhi ( 1 ) India Abstract: In this Article, we have discussed some of the properties of the infinite non-abelian group of matrices whose entries from integers with non-zero determinant. Such as the number of elements of order 2, number of subgroups of order 2 in this group. Moreover for every finite group , there exists such that has a subgroup isomorphic to the group . ( 2 ) Keywords: Infinite non-abelian group, Now from (1) and (2) one can easily say that is Notations: GL(,) n Z []aij n n : aij Z. & homomorphism. det( ) = 1 Now consider , Theorem 1: can be embedded in Clearly Proof: If we prove this theorem for , Hence is injective homomorphism. then we are done. So, by fundamental theorem of isomorphism one can Let us define a mapping easily conclude that can be embedded in for all m . Such that Theorem 2: is non-abelian infinite group Proof: Consider Consider Let A = and And let H= Clearly H is subset of . And H has infinite elements. B= Hence is infinite group. Now consider two matrices Such that determinant of A and B is , where . And ISSN: 2231-5373 http://www.ijmttjournal.org Page 108 International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology (IJMTT) – Volume 48 Number 2 August 2017 Proof: Let G be any group and A(G) be the group of all permutations of set G.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Theory in Particle Physics
    Group Theory in Particle Physics Joshua Albert Phy 205 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:E8_graph.svg Where Did it Come From? Group Theory has it©s origins in: ● Algebraic Equations ● Number Theory ● Geometry Some major early contributers were Euler, Gauss, Lagrange, Abel, and Galois. What is a group? ● A group is a collection of objects with an associated operation. ● The group can be finite or infinite (based on the number of elements in the group. ● The following four conditions must be satisfied for the set of objects to be a group... 1: Closure ● The group operation must associate any pair of elements T and T© in group G with another element T©© in G. This operation is the group multiplication operation, and so we write: – T T© = T©© – T, T©, T©© all in G. ● Essentially, the product of any two group elements is another group element. 2: Associativity ● For any T, T©, T©© all in G, we must have: – (T T©) T©© = T (T© T©©) ● Note that this does not imply: – T T© = T© T – That is commutativity, which is not a fundamental group property 3: Existence of Identity ● There must exist an identity element I in a group G such that: – T I = I T = T ● For every T in G. 4: Existence of Inverse ● For every element T in G there must exist an inverse element T -1 such that: – T T -1 = T -1 T = I ● These four properties can be satisfied by many types of objects, so let©s go through some examples... Some Finite Group Examples: ● Parity – Representable by {1, -1}, {+,-}, {even, odd} – Clearly an important group in particle physics ● Rotations of an Equilateral Triangle – Representable as ordering of vertices: {ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CAB, CBA} – Can also be broken down into subgroups: proper rotations and improper rotations ● The Identity alone (smallest possible group).
    [Show full text]
  • Group Theory
    Appendix A Group Theory This appendix is a survey of only those topics in group theory that are needed to understand the composition of symmetry transformations and its consequences for fundamental physics. It is intended to be self-contained and covers those topics that are needed to follow the main text. Although in the end this appendix became quite long, a thorough understanding of group theory is possible only by consulting the appropriate literature in addition to this appendix. In order that this book not become too lengthy, proofs of theorems were largely omitted; again I refer to other monographs. From its very title, the book by H. Georgi [211] is the most appropriate if particle physics is the primary focus of interest. The book by G. Costa and G. Fogli [102] is written in the same spirit. Both books also cover the necessary group theory for grand unification ideas. A very comprehensive but also rather dense treatment is given by [428]. Still a classic is [254]; it contains more about the treatment of dynamical symmetries in quantum mechanics. A.1 Basics A.1.1 Definitions: Algebraic Structures From the structureless notion of a set, one can successively generate more and more algebraic structures. Those that play a prominent role in physics are defined in the following. Group A group G is a set with elements gi and an operation ◦ (called group multiplication) with the properties that (i) the operation is closed: gi ◦ g j ∈ G, (ii) a neutral element g0 ∈ G exists such that gi ◦ g0 = g0 ◦ gi = gi , (iii) for every gi exists an −1 ∈ ◦ −1 = = −1 ◦ inverse element gi G such that gi gi g0 gi gi , (iv) the operation is associative: gi ◦ (g j ◦ gk) = (gi ◦ g j ) ◦ gk.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Symmetry Groups
    X-Ray and Neutron Crystallography rational numbers is a group under Crystal Symmetry Groups multiplication, and both it and the integer group already discussed are examples of infinite groups because they each contain an infinite number of elements. ymmetry plays an important role between the integers obey the rules of In the case of a symmetry group, in crystallography. The ways in group theory: an element is the operation needed to which atoms and molecules are ● There must be defined a procedure for produce one object from another. For arrangeds within a unit cell and unit cells example, a mirror operation takes an combining two elements of the group repeat within a crystal are governed by to form a third. For the integers one object in one location and produces symmetry rules. In ordinary life our can choose the addition operation so another of the opposite hand located first perception of symmetry is what that a + b = c is the operation to be such that the mirror doing the operation is known as mirror symmetry. Our performed and u, b, and c are always is equidistant between them (Fig. 1). bodies have, to a good approximation, elements of the group. These manipulations are usually called mirror symmetry in which our right side ● There exists an element of the group, symmetry operations. They are com- is matched by our left as if a mirror called the identity element and de- bined by applying them to an object se- passed along the central axis of our noted f, that combines with any other bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinite Groups with Large Balls of Torsion Elements and Small Entropy
    INFINITE GROUPS WITH LARGE BALLS OF TORSION ELEMENTS AND SMALL ENTROPY LAURENT BARTHOLDI, YVES DE CORNULIER Abstract. We exhibit infinite, solvable, abelian-by-finite groups, with a fixed number of generators, with arbitrarily large balls consisting of torsion elements. We also provide a sequence of 3-generator non-nilpotent-by-finite polycyclic groups of algebraic entropy tending to zero. All these examples are obtained by taking ap- propriate quotients of finitely presented groups mapping onto the first Grigorchuk group. The Burnside Problem asks whether a finitely generated group all of whose ele- ments have finite order must be finite. We are interested in the following related question: fix n sufficiently large; given a group Γ, with a finite symmetric generating subset S such that every element in the n-ball is torsion, is Γ finite? Since the Burn- side problem has a negative answer, a fortiori the answer to our question is negative in general. However, it is natural to ask for it in some classes of finitely generated groups for which the Burnside Problem has a positive answer, such as linear groups or solvable groups. This motivates the following proposition, which in particularly answers a question of Breuillard to the authors. Proposition 1. For every n, there exists a group G, generated by a 3-element subset S consisting of elements of order 2, in which the n-ball consists of torsion elements, and satisfying one of the additional assumptions: (1) G is solvable, virtually abelian, and infinite (more precisely, it has a free abelian normal subgroup of finite 2-power index); in particular it is linear.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Symmetry
    Molecular Symmetry 1 I. WHAT IS SYMMETRY AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT? Some object are ”more symmetrical” than others. A sphere is more symmetrical than a cube because it looks the same after rotation through any angle about the diameter. A cube looks the same only if it is rotated through certain angels about specific axes, such as 90o, 180o, or 270o about an axis passing through the centers of any of its opposite faces, or by 120o or 240o about an axis passing through any of the opposite corners. Here are also examples of different molecules which remain the same after certain symme- try operations: NH3, H2O, C6H6, CBrClF . In general, an action which leaves the object looking the same after a transformation is called a symmetry operation. Typical symme- try operations include rotations, reflections, and inversions. There is a corresponding symmetry element for each symmetry operation, which is the point, line, or plane with respect to which the symmetry operation is performed. For instance, a rotation is carried out around an axis, a reflection is carried out in a plane, while an inversion is carried our in a point. We shall see that we can classify molecules that possess the same set of symmetry ele- ments, and grouping together molecules that possess the same set of symmetry elements. This classification is very important, because it allows to make some general conclusions about molecular properties without calculation. Particularly, we will be able to decide if a molecule has a dipole moment, or not and to know in advance the degeneracy of molecular states.
    [Show full text]
  • Kernels of Linear Representations of Lie Groups, Locally Compact
    Kernels of Linear Representations of Lie Groups, Locally Compact Groups, and Pro-Lie Groups Markus Stroppel Abstract For a topological group G the intersection KOR(G) of all kernels of ordinary rep- resentations is studied. We show that KOR(G) is contained in the center of G if G is a connected pro-Lie group. The class KOR(C) is determined explicitly if C is the class CONNLIE of connected Lie groups or the class ALMCONNLIE of almost con- nected Lie groups: in both cases, it consists of all compactly generated abelian Lie groups. Every compact abelian group and every connected abelian pro-Lie group occurs as KOR(G) for some connected pro-Lie group G. However, the dimension of KOR(G) is bounded by the cardinality of the continuum if G is locally compact and connected. Examples are given to show that KOR(C) becomes complicated if C contains groups with infinitely many connected components. 1 The questions we consider and the answers that we have found In the present paper we study (Hausdorff) topological groups. Ifall else fails, we endow a group with the discrete topology. For any group G one tries, traditionally, to understand the group by means of rep- resentations as groups of matrices. To this end, one studies the continuous homomor- phisms from G to GLnC for suitable positive integers n; so-called ordinary representa- tions. This approach works perfectly for finite groups because any such group has a faithful ordinary representation but we may face difficulties for infinite groups; there do exist groups admitting no ordinary representations apart from the trivial (constant) one.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation Theory
    M392C NOTES: REPRESENTATION THEORY ARUN DEBRAY MAY 14, 2017 These notes were taken in UT Austin's M392C (Representation Theory) class in Spring 2017, taught by Sam Gunningham. I live-TEXed them using vim, so there may be typos; please send questions, comments, complaints, and corrections to [email protected]. Thanks to Kartik Chitturi, Adrian Clough, Tom Gannon, Nathan Guermond, Sam Gunningham, Jay Hathaway, and Surya Raghavendran for correcting a few errors. Contents 1. Lie groups and smooth actions: 1/18/172 2. Representation theory of compact groups: 1/20/174 3. Operations on representations: 1/23/176 4. Complete reducibility: 1/25/178 5. Some examples: 1/27/17 10 6. Matrix coefficients and characters: 1/30/17 12 7. The Peter-Weyl theorem: 2/1/17 13 8. Character tables: 2/3/17 15 9. The character theory of SU(2): 2/6/17 17 10. Representation theory of Lie groups: 2/8/17 19 11. Lie algebras: 2/10/17 20 12. The adjoint representations: 2/13/17 22 13. Representations of Lie algebras: 2/15/17 24 14. The representation theory of sl2(C): 2/17/17 25 15. Solvable and nilpotent Lie algebras: 2/20/17 27 16. Semisimple Lie algebras: 2/22/17 29 17. Invariant bilinear forms on Lie algebras: 2/24/17 31 18. Classical Lie groups and Lie algebras: 2/27/17 32 19. Roots and root spaces: 3/1/17 34 20. Properties of roots: 3/3/17 36 21. Root systems: 3/6/17 37 22. Dynkin diagrams: 3/8/17 39 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Algebra I (1St Exam) Solution 2005
    Abstract Algebra I (1st exam) Solution 2005. 3. 21 1. Mark each of following true or false. Give some arguments which clarify your answer (if your answer is false, you may give a counterexample). a. (5pt) The order of any element of a ¯nite cyclic group G is a divisor of jGj. Solution.True. Let g be a generator of G and n = jGj. Then any element ge of n G has order gcd(e;n) which is a divisor of n = jGj. b. (5pt) Any non-trivial cyclic group has exactly two generators. Solution. False. For example, any nonzero element of Zp (p is a prime) is a generator. c. (5pt) If a group G is such that every proper subgroup is cyclic, then G is cyclic. Solution. False. For example, any proper subgroup of Klein 4-group V = fe; a; b; cg is cyclic, but V is not cyclic. d. (5pt) If G is an in¯nite group, then any non-trivial subgroup of G is also an in¯nite group. Solution. False. For example, hC¤; ¢i is an in¯nite group, but the subgroup n ¤ Un = fz 2 C ¤ jz = 1g is a ¯nite subgroup of C . 2. (10pt) Show that a group that has only a ¯nite number of subgroups must be a ¯nite group. Solution. We show that if any in¯nite group G has in¯nitely many subgroups. (case 1) Suppose that G is an in¯nite cyclic group with a generator g. Then the n subgroups Hn = hg i (n = 1; 2; 3;:::) are all distinct subgroups of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Unitary Group - Wikipedia
    Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Special unitary group In mathematics, the special unitary group of degree n, denoted SU( n), is the Lie group of n×n unitary matrices with determinant 1. (More general unitary matrices may have complex determinants with absolute value 1, rather than real 1 in the special case.) The group operation is matrix multiplication. The special unitary group is a subgroup of the unitary group U( n), consisting of all n×n unitary matrices. As a compact classical group, U( n) is the group that preserves the standard inner product on Cn.[nb 1] It is itself a subgroup of the general linear group, SU( n) ⊂ U( n) ⊂ GL( n, C). The SU( n) groups find wide application in the Standard Model of particle physics, especially SU(2) in the electroweak interaction and SU(3) in quantum chromodynamics.[1] The simplest case, SU(1) , is the trivial group, having only a single element. The group SU(2) is isomorphic to the group of quaternions of norm 1, and is thus diffeomorphic to the 3-sphere. Since unit quaternions can be used to represent rotations in 3-dimensional space (up to sign), there is a surjective homomorphism from SU(2) to the rotation group SO(3) whose kernel is {+ I, − I}. [nb 2] SU(2) is also identical to one of the symmetry groups of spinors, Spin(3), that enables a spinor presentation of rotations. Contents Properties Lie algebra Fundamental representation Adjoint representation The group SU(2) Diffeomorphism with S 3 Isomorphism with unit quaternions Lie Algebra The group SU(3) Topology Representation theory Lie algebra Lie algebra structure Generalized special unitary group Example Important subgroups See also 1 of 10 2/22/2018, 8:54 PM Special unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group Remarks Notes References Properties The special unitary group SU( n) is a real Lie group (though not a complex Lie group).
    [Show full text]
  • Jhep09(2015)035
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: July 17, 2015 Accepted: August 19, 2015 Published: September 7, 2015 Higher S-dualities and Shephard-Todd groups JHEP09(2015)035 Sergio Cecottia and Michele Del Zottob aScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, via Bonomea 265, 34100 Trieste, Italy bJefferson Physical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Seiberg and Witten have shown that in = 2 SQCD with N = 2N = 4 N f c the S-duality group PSL(2, Z) acts on the flavor charges, which are weights of Spin(8), by triality. There are other = 2 SCFTs in which SU(2) SYM is coupled to strongly- N interacting non-Lagrangian matter: their matter charges are weights of E6, E7 and E8 instead of Spin(8). The S-duality group PSL(2, Z) acts on these weights: what replaces Spin(8) triality for the E6,E7,E8 root lattices? In this paper we answer the question. The action on the matter charges of (a finite central extension of) PSL(2, Z) factorizes trough the action of the exceptional Shephard- Todd groups G4 and G8 which should be seen as complex analogs of the usual triality group S Weyl(A ). Our analysis is based on the identification of S-duality for SU(2) gauge 3 ≃ 2 SCFTs with the group of automorphisms of the cluster category of weighted projective lines of tubular type. Keywords: Supersymmetry and Duality, Extended Supersymmetry, Duality in Gauge Field Theories ArXiv ePrint: 1507.01799 Open Access, c The Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Group and Symmetry
    Chapter 1 Group and Symmetry 1.1 Introduction 1. A group (G) is a collection of elements that can ‘multiply’ and ‘di- vide’. The ‘multiplication’ ∗ is a binary operation that is associative but not necessarily commutative. Formally, the defining properties are: (a) if g1, g2 ∈ G, then g1 ∗ g2 ∈ G; (b) there is an identity e ∈ G so that g ∗ e = e ∗ g = g for every g ∈ G. The identity e is sometimes written as 1 or 1; (c) there is a unique inverse g−1 for every g ∈ G so that g ∗ g−1 = g−1 ∗ g = e. The multiplication rules of a group can be listed in a multiplication table, in which every group element occurs once and only once in every row and every column (prove this !) . For example, the following is the multiplication table of a group with four elements named Z4. e g1 g2 g3 e e g1 g2 g3 g1 g1 g2 g3 e g2 g2 g3 e g1 g3 g3 e g1 g2 Table 2.1 Multiplication table of Z4 3 4 CHAPTER 1. GROUP AND SYMMETRY 2. Two groups with identical multiplication tables are usually considered to be the same. We also say that these two groups are isomorphic. Group elements could be familiar mathematical objects, such as numbers, matrices, and differential operators. In that case group multiplication is usually the ordinary multiplication, but it could also be ordinary addition. In the latter case the inverse of g is simply −g, the identity e is simply 0, and the group multiplication is commutative.
    [Show full text]