DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1305.5974V1 [Math-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1305.5974V1 [Math-Ph] INTRODUCTION TO SPORADIC GROUPS for physicists Luis J. Boya∗ Departamento de F´ısica Te´orica Universidad de Zaragoza E-50009 Zaragoza, SPAIN MSC: 20D08, 20D05, 11F22 PACS numbers: 02.20.a, 02.20.Bb, 11.24.Yb Key words: Finite simple groups, sporadic groups, the Monster group. Juan SANCHO GUIMERA´ In Memoriam Abstract We describe the collection of finite simple groups, with a view on physical applications. We recall first the prime cyclic groups Zp, and the alternating groups Altn>4. After a quick revision of finite fields Fq, q = pf , with p prime, we consider the 16 families of finite simple groups of Lie type. There are also 26 extra “sporadic” groups, which gather in three interconnected “generations” (with 5+7+8 groups) plus the Pariah groups (6). We point out a couple of physical applications, in- cluding constructing the biggest sporadic group, the “Monster” group, with close to 1054 elements from arguments of physics, and also the relation of some Mathieu groups with compactification in string and M-theory. ∗[email protected] arXiv:1305.5974v1 [math-ph] 25 May 2013 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Generaldescriptionofthework . 3 1.2 Initialmathematics............................ 7 2 Generalities about groups 14 2.1 Elementarynotions............................ 14 2.2 Theframeworkorbox .......................... 16 2.3 Subgroups................................. 18 2.4 Morphisms ................................ 22 2.5 Extensions................................. 23 2.6 Familiesoffinitegroups ......................... 24 2.7 Abeliangroups .............................. 27 2.8 Symmetricgroup ............................. 28 3 More advanced group theory 30 3.1 Groupsoperationginspaces. 30 3.2 Representations.............................. 32 3.3 Characters.Fourierseries . 35 3.4 Homological algebra and extension theory . 37 3.5 Groupsuptoorder16........................... 40 3.6 Characterizationofgroups. 42 4 Finite simple groups 45 4.1 The search for finite simple groups: historical survey . 45 4.2 Finitefields ................................ 46 4.3 Generalseries(PSL) ........................... 48 4.4 Otherregularseries(O,Sp,U) . 51 4.5 Exceptionalseries. ............................ 55 4.6 Division algebras and octonions. 58 5 Sporadic groups 61 5.1 Introductiontosporadicgroups. 61 5.2 Thefirstgeneration: Mathieugroups. 62 5.3 Secondfamilyofsporadicgroups.. 65 5.4 TheMonstergroup. ........................... 66 5.5 OthergroupsintheMonsterfamily. 68 5.6 The“Pariah”groups. .......................... 68 5.7 Tableofsporadicgroupsbysize. 70 6 Physical applications 71 6.1 Rotationsandpermutations. 71 6.2 MonstrousMoonshine. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 73 6.3 StringTheory. .............................. 75 6.4 K3 and M24 ................................ 76 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 76 8 LITERATURE 78 2 1 Introduction 1.1 General description of the work 1.1.1 Motivation. The algebraic structures called groups first appeared dis- tinctly in mathematics in the first third of the 19th century, after the work of Gauss (on congruences), and Lagrange, Ruffini, Abel and above all Galois, in re- lation to the solvability of polynomial equations by radicals: the groups appearing did permute the roots of the equation. In physics also finite groups were tacitly used, e.g. by Bravais, to classify some crystal lattices around 1850, and better and more directly by Fedorov, at the turn of that century. Lie groups, i.e. infinite continuous groups with some differentiability proper- ties, were first considered by Lie around 1870 in relation to solutions of differential equations, trying to imitate what Galois had done with algebraic equations. Cayley had provided in 1854 the first formal definition of a group, the same we use today. Klein (since 1872) identified many continuous groups acting by transformations on the diverse geometries, and even characterized these Geometries (euclidean, metric, affine, projective, conformal, etc.) by the group of allowed transformations, in the so-called “Erlangen-Program” [1]. By the turn of the 19th/20th centuries, groups were taking a prominent role in mathematics (Poincar´e, Hilbert, etc.), consolidated around 1920 as an indispensable part of Modern Algebra, indeed the core of it. With the advent of Quantum Mechanics (QM) in Physics in 1925, as evolu- tion of the Old Quantum Theory (of Planck, Einstein and Bohr, 1900-1925), some Lie groups and their representations were to be used in physics, starting with the three dimensional rotation group SO(3). Besides some original books in group the- ory at the very beginning [2-4], the three standard books for physics at the time were by Weyl, van der Waerden and Wigner ([5, 6], and ([7]). The Pauli exclusion principle led also to some properties of the representations of the symmetric group Sym S , with n! elements (Heisenberg, and Dirac, independently, in 1926). n ≡ n Soon the interest in atomic and nuclear physics and also in particle physics shifted wholly to general, continuous, Lie groups: isospin group: Heisenberg (1932); Poincar´egroup, Wigner (1939); Gell-Mann’s SU(3) flavor group (1962), etc, i.e. finite-dimensional manifolds which support a compatible group structure; as sym- metry operations enter QM through linear (and projective) representations, this formalism, including decomposition of products, traces, covering groups, etc., was more and more used in that period, as evidence the books mentioned above. Some people even talked about the Gruppenpest, [8]; so it was not before around 1962 that quantum physicists realized Group Theory was an unavoidable part of their mathematical toolkit. While continuous (simple Lie) groups were classified already by Killing and Car- tan around 1887/95, similar work on finite groups was very much delayed. After the foundational period with Jordan, Mathieu, Klein, etc, simple groups of Lie type (over finite fields) were studied by Dickson and Miller. Since around 1920 group theory took a preeminent role in mathematics, as said. By 1960, mathematicians were busy completing the list of families of finite simple groups (FSG), continuing the work started by Dickson (as mentioned) at the turn of the 20th century, and 3 the later one by Chevalley, Borel etc. about 1950 on some finite groups of Lie type. These FSG groups occur in several families (2+16, as we shall see), plus some iso- lated, sporadic groups (26 of them), initially discovered (the first five) by Mathieu in 1860: these first sporadic groups are still called Mathieu groups today. After a full century with no new sporadic groups found, the list was completed by the biggest of all, the Monster group M, conceived around 1973 by Fischer and Griess and definitively established in 1980 by Griess; see e.g. his [14]; it was given an al- ternative built-up form, inspired by string theory, a physical construct, by Frenkel et al. in 1984 [9], completed by Borcherds ([10], see [11, 12]). This was important also for physics, and indeed soon after other “sporadic” finite groups (e.g. M24, the largest Mathieu group) were used, in relation with the compactifying space K3 [13]. It is the purpose of this review to introduce the theory of FSG, in particular the sporadic groups, to a physics audience. We feel the time is ripe for that, as in one hand theoretical physics is in a standstill in microphysics, with no real progress made since around 1976, when the so-called Standard Model was completely estab- lished, so any new avenue is worth exploring, and on the other hand many physical clues point to concrete, finite symmetries, mostly realized as finite groups (examples will be discussed later). We recognize there was the construction of the Monster group via the Vertex Operators appearing in superstring theory [9], which triggered the interest of physicists in this somewhat exotic branch of pure mathematics. At the same time, we realized that while the practice of Lie groups today makes use of the tools known to the average theoretical physicist (e.g. differential geom- etry, representation theory), this is not the same for the finite groups; we want to supply a decent mathematical basis for individuals to engage in actual research in physics dealing with finite groups. So we have aimed to expose the theory from the beginning, although the very first definitions and concepts are glossed over rather quickly; it is our idea this re- view will serve as reference, so we shall start by recalling even the simplest notions of modern mathematics, e.g. sets and maps. In that spirit, we have strived to present things in a modern mathematical language. Although intended mainly for physicists, we have aimed at presenting the ma- terial from a modern point of view, also from the mathematical side: for us, mathe- matics is not only an instrument to describe the physical world, say helping to solve equations, but it also represents a conceptual frame, a building, in which physical events take place and develop. So we hope some mathematicians looking at this review can benefit, too. 1.1.2 What we cover. As we want to present the pure mathematical doctrine in actual terms, and often the mathematical instruction of physicists does not use several of these modern concepts, we have tried to show a modern unified treatment of algebra in general and group theory in particular starting from scratch, although naturally many results, theorems etc. are given only a cursory treatment. Our idea is that all concepts, definitions and results will be clearly if briefly stated, while many results are taken for granted and several others presented with proofs,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A General Theory of Localizations
    GENERAL THEORY OF LOCALIZATION DAVID WHITE • Localization in Algebra • Localization in Category Theory • Bousfield localization Thank them for the invitation. Last section contains some of my PhD research, under Mark Hovey at Wesleyan University. For more, please see my website: dwhite03.web.wesleyan.edu 1. The right way to think about localization in algebra Localization is a systematic way of adding multiplicative inverses to a ring, i.e. given a commutative ring R with unity and a multiplicative subset S ⊂ R (i.e. contains 1, closed under product), localization constructs a ring S−1R and a ring homomorphism j : R ! S−1R that takes elements in S to units in S−1R. We want to do this in the best way possible, and we formalize that via a universal property, i.e. for any f : R ! T taking S to units we have a unique g: j R / S−1R f g T | Recall that S−1R is just R × S= ∼ where (r; s) is really r=s and r=s ∼ r0=s0 iff t(rs0 − sr0) = 0 for some t (i.e. fractions are reduced to lowest terms). The ring structure can be verified just as −1 for Q. The map j takes r 7! r=1, and given f you can set g(r=s) = f(r)f(s) . Demonstrate commutativity of the triangle here. The universal property is saying that S−1R is the closest ring to R with the property that all s 2 S are units. A category theorist uses the universal property to define the object, then uses R × S= ∼ as a construction to prove it exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Objects in Categories
    Complete objects in categories James Richard Andrew Gray February 22, 2021 Abstract We introduce the notions of proto-complete, complete, complete˚ and strong-complete objects in pointed categories. We show under mild condi- tions on a pointed exact protomodular category that every proto-complete (respectively complete) object is the product of an abelian proto-complete (respectively complete) object and a strong-complete object. This to- gether with the observation that the trivial group is the only abelian complete group recovers a theorem of Baer classifying complete groups. In addition we generalize several theorems about groups (subgroups) with trivial center (respectively, centralizer), and provide a categorical explana- tion behind why the derivation algebra of a perfect Lie algebra with trivial center and the automorphism group of a non-abelian (characteristically) simple group are strong-complete. 1 Introduction Recall that Carmichael [19] called a group G complete if it has trivial cen- ter and each automorphism is inner. For each group G there is a canonical homomorphism cG from G to AutpGq, the automorphism group of G. This ho- momorphism assigns to each g in G the inner automorphism which sends each x in G to gxg´1. It can be readily seen that a group G is complete if and only if cG is an isomorphism. Baer [1] showed that a group G is complete if and only if every normal monomorphism with domain G is a split monomorphism. We call an object in a pointed category complete if it satisfies this latter condi- arXiv:2102.09834v1 [math.CT] 19 Feb 2021 tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Category of G-Groups and Its Spectral Category
    Communications in Algebra ISSN: 0092-7872 (Print) 1532-4125 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lagb20 Category of G-Groups and its Spectral Category María José Arroyo Paniagua & Alberto Facchini To cite this article: María José Arroyo Paniagua & Alberto Facchini (2017) Category of G-Groups and its Spectral Category, Communications in Algebra, 45:4, 1696-1710, DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2016.1222409 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2016.1222409 Accepted author version posted online: 07 Oct 2016. Published online: 07 Oct 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 12 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=lagb20 Download by: [UNAM Ciudad Universitaria] Date: 29 November 2016, At: 17:29 COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA® 2017, VOL. 45, NO. 4, 1696–1710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2016.1222409 Category of G-Groups and its Spectral Category María José Arroyo Paniaguaa and Alberto Facchinib aDepartamento de Matemáticas, División de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, Mexico, D. F., México; bDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Let G be a group. We analyse some aspects of the category G-Grp of G-groups. Received 15 April 2016 In particular, we show that a construction similar to the construction of the Revised 22 July 2016 spectral category, due to Gabriel and Oberst, and its dual, due to the second Communicated by T. Albu. author, is possible for the category G-Grp.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Introductory Remarks on Supersymmetry. 1.2
    1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Introductory remarks on supersymmetry. 1.2. Classical mechanics, the electromagnetic, and gravitational fields. 1.3. Principles of quantum mechanics. 1.4. Symmetries and projective unitary representations. 1.5. Poincar´esymmetry and particle classification. 1.6. Vector bundles and wave equations. The Maxwell, Dirac, and Weyl - equations. 1.7. Bosons and fermions. 1.8. Supersymmetry as the symmetry of Z2{graded geometry. 1.1. Introductory remarks on supersymmetry. The subject of supersymme- try (SUSY) is a part of the theory of elementary particles and their interactions and the still unfinished quest of obtaining a unified view of all the elementary forces in a manner compatible with quantum theory and general relativity. Supersymme- try was discovered in the early 1970's, and in the intervening years has become a major component of theoretical physics. Its novel mathematical features have led to a deeper understanding of the geometrical structure of spacetime, a theme to which great thinkers like Riemann, Poincar´e,Einstein, Weyl, and many others have contributed. Symmetry has always played a fundamental role in quantum theory: rotational symmetry in the theory of spin, Poincar´esymmetry in the classification of elemen- tary particles, and permutation symmetry in the treatment of systems of identical particles. Supersymmetry is a new kind of symmetry which was discovered by the physicists in the early 1970's. However, it is different from all other discoveries in physics in the sense that there has been no experimental evidence supporting it so far. Nevertheless an enormous effort has been expended by many physicists in developing it because of its many unique features and also because of its beauty and coherence1.
    [Show full text]
  • Projective Unitary Representations of Infinite Dimensional Lie Groups
    Projective unitary representations of infinite dimensional Lie groups Bas Janssens and Karl-Hermann Neeb January 5, 2015 Abstract For an infinite dimensional Lie group G modelled on a locally convex Lie algebra g, we prove that every smooth projective unitary represen- tation of G corresponds to a smooth linear unitary representation of a Lie group extension G] of G. (The main point is the smooth structure on G].) For infinite dimensional Lie groups G which are 1-connected, regular, and modelled on a barrelled Lie algebra g, we characterize the unitary g-representations which integrate to G. Combining these results, we give a precise formulation of the correspondence between smooth pro- jective unitary representations of G, smooth linear unitary representations of G], and the appropriate unitary representations of its Lie algebra g]. Contents 1 Representations of locally convex Lie groups 5 1.1 Smooth functions . 5 1.2 Locally convex Lie groups . 6 2 Projective unitary representations 7 2.1 Unitary representations . 7 2.2 Projective unitary representations . 7 3 Integration of Lie algebra representations 8 3.1 Derived representations . 9 3.2 Globalisation of Lie algebra representations . 10 3.2.1 Weak and strong topology on V . 11 3.2.2 Regular Lie algebra representations . 15 4 Projective unitary representations and central extensions 20 5 Smoothness of projective representations 25 5.1 Smoothness criteria . 25 5.2 Structure of the set of smooth rays . 26 1 6 Lie algebra extensions and cohomology 28 7 The main theorem 31 8 Covariant representations 33 9 Admissible derivations 36 9.1 Admissible derivations .
    [Show full text]
  • Unitary Group - Wikipedia
    Unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_group Unitary group In mathematics, the unitary group of degree n, denoted U( n), is the group of n × n unitary matrices, with the group operation of matrix multiplication. The unitary group is a subgroup of the general linear group GL( n, C). Hyperorthogonal group is an archaic name for the unitary group, especially over finite fields. For the group of unitary matrices with determinant 1, see Special unitary group. In the simple case n = 1, the group U(1) corresponds to the circle group, consisting of all complex numbers with absolute value 1 under multiplication. All the unitary groups contain copies of this group. The unitary group U( n) is a real Lie group of dimension n2. The Lie algebra of U( n) consists of n × n skew-Hermitian matrices, with the Lie bracket given by the commutator. The general unitary group (also called the group of unitary similitudes ) consists of all matrices A such that A∗A is a nonzero multiple of the identity matrix, and is just the product of the unitary group with the group of all positive multiples of the identity matrix. Contents Properties Topology Related groups 2-out-of-3 property Special unitary and projective unitary groups G-structure: almost Hermitian Generalizations Indefinite forms Finite fields Degree-2 separable algebras Algebraic groups Unitary group of a quadratic module Polynomial invariants Classifying space See also Notes References Properties Since the determinant of a unitary matrix is a complex number with norm 1, the determinant gives a group 1 of 7 2/23/2018, 10:13 AM Unitary group - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitary_group homomorphism The kernel of this homomorphism is the set of unitary matrices with determinant 1.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Generation Methods of Finite Simple Groups
    Introduction Preliminaries Special Kind of Generation of Finite Simple Groups The Bibliography On Some Generation Methods of Finite Simple Groups Ayoub B. M. Basheer Department of Mathematical Sciences, North-West University (Mafikeng), P Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa Groups St Andrews 2017 in Birmingham, School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom 11th of August 2017 Ayoub Basheer, North-West University, South Africa Groups St Andrews 2017 Talk in Birmingham Introduction Preliminaries Special Kind of Generation of Finite Simple Groups The Bibliography Abstract In this talk we consider some methods of generating finite simple groups with the focus on ranks of classes, (p; q; r)-generation and spread (exact) of finite simple groups. We show some examples of results that were established by the author and his supervisor, Professor J. Moori on generations of some finite simple groups. Ayoub Basheer, North-West University, South Africa Groups St Andrews 2017 Talk in Birmingham Introduction Preliminaries Special Kind of Generation of Finite Simple Groups The Bibliography Introduction Generation of finite groups by suitable subsets is of great interest and has many applications to groups and their representations. For example, Di Martino and et al. [39] established a useful connection between generation of groups by conjugate elements and the existence of elements representable by almost cyclic matrices. Their motivation was to study irreducible projective representations of the sporadic simple groups. In view of applications, it is often important to exhibit generating pairs of some special kind, such as generators carrying a geometric meaning, generators of some prescribed order, generators that offer an economical presentation of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • On Absolute Points of Correlations in PG $(2, Q^ N) $
    On absolute points of correlations in PG(2,qn) Jozefien D’haeseleer ∗ Department of Mathematics: Analysis, Logic and Discrete Mathematics Ghent University Gent, Flanders, Belgium [email protected] Nicola Durante Dipartimento di Matematica e Applicazioni ”Caccioppoli” Universit`adi Napoli ”Federico II”, Complesso di Monte S. Angelo Napoli, Italy [email protected] Submitted: Aug 1, 2019; Accepted: May 8, 2020; Published: TBD c The authors. Released under the CC BY-ND license (International 4.0). Abstract Let V bea(d+1)-dimensional vector space over a field F. Sesquilinear forms over V have been largely studied when they are reflexive and hence give rise to a (possibly degenerate) polarity of the d-dimensional projective space PG(V ). Everything is known in this case for both degenerate and non-degenerate reflexive forms if F is either R, C or a finite field Fq. In this paper we consider degenerate, non- F3 reflexive sesquilinear forms of V = qn . We will see that these forms give rise to degenerate correlations of PG(2,qn) whose set of absolute points are, besides cones, m the (possibly degenerate) CF -sets studied in [8]. In the final section we collect some results from the huge work of B.C. Kestenband regarding what is known for the set of the absolute points of correlations in PG(2,qn) induced by a non-degenerate, F3 non-reflexive sesquilinear form of V = qn . Mathematics Subject Classifications: 51E21,05B25 arXiv:2005.05698v1 [math.CO] 12 May 2020 1 Introduction and definitions Let V and W be two vector spaces over the same field F.
    [Show full text]
  • Janko's Sporadic Simple Groups
    Janko’s Sporadic Simple Groups: a bit of history Algebra, Geometry and Computation CARMA, Workshop on Mathematics and Computation Terry Gagen and Don Taylor The University of Sydney 20 June 2015 Fifty years ago: the discovery In January 1965, a surprising announcement was communicated to the international mathematical community. Zvonimir Janko, working as a Research Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Study within the Australian National University had constructed a new sporadic simple group. Before 1965 only five sporadic simple groups were known. They had been discovered almost exactly one hundred years prior (1861 and 1873) by Émile Mathieu but the proof of their simplicity was only obtained in 1900 by G. A. Miller. Finite simple groups: earliest examples É The cyclic groups Zp of prime order and the alternating groups Alt(n) of even permutations of n 5 items were the earliest simple groups to be studied (Gauss,≥ Euler, Abel, etc.) É Evariste Galois knew about PSL(2,p) and wrote about them in his letter to Chevalier in 1832 on the night before the duel. É Camille Jordan (Traité des substitutions et des équations algébriques,1870) wrote about linear groups defined over finite fields of prime order and determined their composition factors. The ‘groupes abéliens’ of Jordan are now called symplectic groups and his ‘groupes hypoabéliens’ are orthogonal groups in characteristic 2. É Émile Mathieu introduced the five groups M11, M12, M22, M23 and M24 in 1861 and 1873. The classical groups, G2 and E6 É In his PhD thesis Leonard Eugene Dickson extended Jordan’s work to linear groups over all finite fields and included the unitary groups.
    [Show full text]
  • [Math.GR] 9 Jul 2003 Buildings and Classical Groups
    Buildings and Classical Groups Linus Kramer∗ Mathematisches Institut, Universit¨at W¨urzburg Am Hubland, D–97074 W¨urzburg, Germany email: [email protected] In these notes we describe the classical groups, that is, the linear groups and the orthogonal, symplectic, and unitary groups, acting on finite dimen- sional vector spaces over skew fields, as well as their pseudo-quadratic gen- eralizations. Each such group corresponds in a natural way to a point-line geometry, and to a spherical building. The geometries in question are pro- jective spaces and polar spaces. We emphasize in particular the rˆole played by root elations and the groups generated by these elations. The root ela- tions reflect — via their commutator relations — algebraic properties of the underlying vector space. We also discuss some related algebraic topics: the classical groups as per- mutation groups and the associated simple groups. I have included some remarks on K-theory, which might be interesting for applications. The first K-group measures the difference between the classical group and its subgroup generated by the root elations. The second K-group is a kind of fundamental group of the group generated by the root elations and is related to central extensions. I also included some material on Moufang sets, since this is an in- arXiv:math/0307117v1 [math.GR] 9 Jul 2003 teresting topic. In this context, the projective line over a skew field is treated in some detail, and possibly with some new results. The theory of unitary groups is developed along the lines of Hahn & O’Meara [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Symmetry Groups
    X-Ray and Neutron Crystallography rational numbers is a group under Crystal Symmetry Groups multiplication, and both it and the integer group already discussed are examples of infinite groups because they each contain an infinite number of elements. ymmetry plays an important role between the integers obey the rules of In the case of a symmetry group, in crystallography. The ways in group theory: an element is the operation needed to which atoms and molecules are ● There must be defined a procedure for produce one object from another. For arrangeds within a unit cell and unit cells example, a mirror operation takes an combining two elements of the group repeat within a crystal are governed by to form a third. For the integers one object in one location and produces symmetry rules. In ordinary life our can choose the addition operation so another of the opposite hand located first perception of symmetry is what that a + b = c is the operation to be such that the mirror doing the operation is known as mirror symmetry. Our performed and u, b, and c are always is equidistant between them (Fig. 1). bodies have, to a good approximation, elements of the group. These manipulations are usually called mirror symmetry in which our right side ● There exists an element of the group, symmetry operations. They are com- is matched by our left as if a mirror called the identity element and de- bined by applying them to an object se- passed along the central axis of our noted f, that combines with any other bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Categorical Semantics of Constructive Set Theory
    Categorical semantics of constructive set theory Beim Fachbereich Mathematik der Technischen Universit¨atDarmstadt eingereichte Habilitationsschrift von Benno van den Berg, PhD aus Emmen, die Niederlande 2 Contents 1 Introduction to the thesis 7 1.1 Logic and metamathematics . 7 1.2 Historical intermezzo . 8 1.3 Constructivity . 9 1.4 Constructive set theory . 11 1.5 Algebraic set theory . 15 1.6 Contents . 17 1.7 Warning concerning terminology . 18 1.8 Acknowledgements . 19 2 A unified approach to algebraic set theory 21 2.1 Introduction . 21 2.2 Constructive set theories . 24 2.3 Categories with small maps . 25 2.3.1 Axioms . 25 2.3.2 Consequences . 29 2.3.3 Strengthenings . 31 2.3.4 Relation to other settings . 32 2.4 Models of set theory . 33 2.5 Examples . 35 2.6 Predicative sheaf theory . 36 2.7 Predicative realizability . 37 3 Exact completion 41 3.1 Introduction . 41 3 4 CONTENTS 3.2 Categories with small maps . 45 3.2.1 Classes of small maps . 46 3.2.2 Classes of display maps . 51 3.3 Axioms for classes of small maps . 55 3.3.1 Representability . 55 3.3.2 Separation . 55 3.3.3 Power types . 55 3.3.4 Function types . 57 3.3.5 Inductive types . 58 3.3.6 Infinity . 60 3.3.7 Fullness . 61 3.4 Exactness and its applications . 63 3.5 Exact completion . 66 3.6 Stability properties of axioms for small maps . 73 3.6.1 Representability . 74 3.6.2 Separation . 74 3.6.3 Power types .
    [Show full text]